Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 176654

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : TD13 - TD16 Full Version

Giant Non-traumatic Splenic Pseudocyst Mimicking a Pancreatic Pseudocyst: A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/91298.24371
Priya Dharshini Rajaram, Ramidi Yeshwanth Reddy, Jasvant Ram Ananthasayanam, Paarthipan Natarajan

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Priya Dharshini Rajaram,
Postgraduate Student, Department of Radiology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai-600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: pdmdrd@gmail.com

Abstract

Splenic pseudocysts are rare non-parasitic cystic lesions of the spleen characterised by the absence of an epithelial lining. Most occur following trauma, whereas non-traumatic splenic pseudocysts are uncommon. A 45-year-old woman presented with a one-year history of chronic postprandial vomiting, early satiety, abdominal fullness, weight loss (6-7 kg), and recent-onset breathlessness. Initial ultrasonography suggested a pancreatic pseudocyst because of the apparent proximity of the lesion to the pancreatic tail and poor visualisation of the spleen. However, normal serum amylase and lipase levels together with unexplained cytopenias prompted further evaluation. Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) revealed a large splenic cystic lesion with peripheral calcifications and internal septations, establishing its splenic origin and prompting revision of the initial diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocyst. The patient subsequently underwent open splenectomy. Histopathological examination confirmed a splenic pseudocyst. This case highlights that a presumed pancreatic pseudocyst in the absence of pancreatitis and with normal serum amylase and lipase levels should prompt consideration of alternative diagnoses, including splenic pseudocyst.

Keywords

Computed tomography, Cystic splenic lesion, Histopathology, Hypersplenism, Splenectomy

Case Report

A 45-year-old woman presented with a one-year history of recurrent postprandial vomiting, early satiety, reduced appetite, progressive upper abdominal fullness, and an unintentional weight loss of 6-7 kg. The vomiting was non-bilious, non-projectile, consisted of recently ingested food, and was not associated with haematemesis. She also reported progressive exertional dyspnoea {New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II} for the preceding 10 days, without chest pain, cough, fever, or orthopnoea. No history of abdominal pain, no alcohol intake, no fever, no jaundice, no gastrointestinal bleeding, no abdominal trauma, no history of tuberculosis, and no previous abdominal surgery. The patient had been a known case of type 2 diabetes mellitus for one year and was on oral hypoglycaemic agents, including glimepiride 1 mg twice daily and pioglitazone 15 mg once daily. She had been diagnosed with hypothyroidism one month before admission and was on levothyroxine (Thyronorm) 25 μg once daily. She was also diagnosed with systemic hypertension two weeks prior to presentation and was receiving nifedipine 10 mg three times daily and enalapril 5 mg once daily. The patient reported regular compliance with her prescribed medications.

On examination, she was haemodynamically stable. Abdominal examination revealed a smooth, non-tender swelling in the left hypochondrium, measuring approximately 10 x 10 cm. The overlying skin was normal (Table/Fig 1). The remainder of the systemic examination was unremarkable.

Ultrasound of the abdomen demonstrated a large, well-defined unilocular cystic lesion measuring about 13×12×13 cm. There was internal echogenic debris with Brownian motion likely representing proteinaceous material, cholesterol debris, haemosiderin-laden macrophages, and cellular debris. A few smooth thick septations were seen within. The lesion seemed to be in close relation to the pancreatic tail and greater curvature of stomach. No definite solid component was observed (Table/Fig 2). Based on the sonographic appearance, a provisional diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocyst arising from the tail of the pancreas was considered. Doppler assessment was not performed because the lesion demonstrated unequivocally cystic morphology on grayscale ultrasonography.

Haemoglobin was 9 g/dL (normal: 12-15 g/dL), platelet count was 0.91 lacs/mm3 (normal: 1.5-4.5 lac/mm³), and total leucocyte count was 3,870 cells/mm³ (normal: 4,000-11,000 cells/mm³). The combination of anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and leucopenia was unusual in a pancreatic pseudocyst and suggested an underlying splenic pathology with hypersplenism. Coagulation parameters were within normal limits. Peripheral blood smear revealed normocytic normochromic anaemia with normal leucocyte morphology and no haemoparasites. Liver function tests were unremarkable, making hepatic dysfunction or coagulopathy unlikely contributors to the observed cytopenias. Furthermore, the patient had no documented history suggestive of pancreatitis. Serum amylase and lipase levels were 54 U/L (normal: 30-110 U/L) and 77 U/L (normal: 0-160 U/L), respectively, both within normal limits. These findings did not support the diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocyst.

In view of the discrepancy between the ultrasonographic impression and the clinical-biochemical findings, CECT of the abdomen was performed. CECT demonstrated a well-defined non-enhancing cystic lesion measuring approximately 13×11.5×14 cm arising from the lower pole of the spleen. A few peripheral calcific specks and a few thin incomplete septations without nodularity were noted. Mild enhancement was confined to the septations on post-contrast images. No mural nodules, irregular wall thickening, or enhancing solid components were identified. These findings favoured a benign non-neoplastic cystic lesion. The lesion exerted significant mass effect on the stomach, explaining the patient’s longstanding symptoms of early satiety and postprandial vomiting. Splenomegaly was also evident on CT (Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4), (Table/Fig 5).

The lesion measured 13×12×13 cm on ultrasonography and 13×11.5×14 cm on CECT, demonstrating good radiologic concordance. At this stage, the diagnosis was revised from pancreatic pseudocyst to a primary splenic cystic lesion. Hydatid cyst remained a consideration because of the large size and peripheral calcific foci. There were no daughter cysts, detached membranes, or other radiological features characteristic of hydatid disease. A foregut duplication cyst was less likely because the lesion was clearly intraparenchymal within the spleen. A true splenic cyst could not be excluded radiologically. Due to the large size of the lesion and the persistence of symptoms and haematological abnormalities suggestive of hypersplenism, surgical management was planned. Open splenectomy was planned because of the large size of the lesion.

On intraoperative findings, a giant cyst involving much of the spleen was identified. Greenish-yellow fluid was aspirated, and a cytology specimen was submitted (Table/Fig 6). Gram stain demonstrated a few pus cells with occasional Gram-positive cocci in pairs, while culture showed no growth. Ziehl-Neelsen staining for acid-fast bacilli was negative, and GeneXpert (CBNAAT) did not detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cytology identified scattered neutrophils, lymphocytes, and cyst macrophages within an inflammatory background. No atypical or malignant cells were seen. The greenish-yellow appearance of the fluid was considered most likely secondary to chronic degeneration of blood products, cholesterol-rich debris, and inflammatory cellular contents within the longstanding cyst.

On gross examination, a splenectomy specimen measuring 16×15×8 cm was identified. On cut examination, a multiloculated cyst measuring 11×10×8 cm was detected (Table/Fig 7). The slightly smaller pathological dimensions likely reflect postexcision collapse of the cyst cavity following drainage of its contents and specimen fixation.

Histopathological examination demonstrated marked congestion of the splenic parenchyma with dilated sinusoids and veins and prominent haemosiderin deposition. The cyst wall was markedly thickened and fibrotic, containing foamy histiocytes, siderophages, focal calcification, and cholesterol clefts. Despite extensive sampling, no epithelial lining was identified, confirming the diagnosis of a splenic pseudocyst (Table/Fig 8).

The postoperative course was largely uneventful. The patient was managed with adequate analgesia, incentive spirometry, breathing exercises, and chest physiotherapy beginning on postoperative day 3. Blood pressure monitoring was performed regularly in view of pre-existing hypertension. On postoperative day 4, she developed elevated blood pressure readings up to 170/90 mmHg and was evaluated by the cardiology team. Antihypertensive therapy was optimised with continuation of nifedipine and enalapril, along with intravenous labetalol as required. Blood pressure subsequently stabilised.

The patient was discharged on postoperative day 8 in stable condition. The patient had received preoperative vaccination with Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine (PPV23), meningococcal vaccine, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine. At approximately four weeks of follow-up, the patient reported symptomatic improvement. Repeat haematological evaluation demonstrated improvement in haemoglobin levels (10.1 g/dL), normalisation of total leucocyte count (9200 cells/mm³), and resolution of thrombocytopenia with a platelet count of 4.75 lacs/mm³, supporting hypersplenism as the cause of the preoperative cytopenias.

Discussion

Splenic pseudocysts are uncommon and constitute a small proportion of non-parasitic splenic cysts. They are mostly said to develop after trauma, resulting in the liquefaction and organisation of intrasplenic haematoma. Non-traumatic pseudocysts are relatively rare and less understood (1). Clinical presentation would depend on the size of the cyst. Small cysts are asymptomatic, whereas large cysts can cause abdominal fullness, early satiety, vomiting, respiratory symptoms, or a palpable abdominal mass due to compression of other organs (2),(3).

The exact pathogenesis of non-traumatic splenic pseudocysts remains incompletely understood. Unlike traumatic pseudocysts, which develop following organisation and liquefaction of intrasplenic haematomas, non-traumatic pseudocysts have been associated with spontaneous intracystic haemorrhage, infarction, infection, and degeneration of pre-existing splenic lesions (1),(4). In the present case, the absence of trauma together with the histopathological findings of a thick fibrotic wall, siderophages, cholesterol clefts, and focal calcification suggests chronic organisation of a previous intracystic haemorrhagic event as the most likely mechanism (4). Epithelial lining was absent, ruling out a true splenic cyst and a foregut duplication cyst. No hydatid membranes or parasitic elements were seen, and hydatid disease was ruled out. The cytology was negative for malignancy, but no evidence of neoplastic involvement was found in the biopsy. Based on these findings, a final diagnosis of non-traumatic splenic pseudocyst was established.

Management depends on cyst size, symptoms, and complications. Small asymptomatic cysts may be managed conservatively with periodic imaging follow-up. Surgical intervention is generally recommended for symptomatic cysts, lesions larger than 5 cm, rapidly enlarging cysts, or those complicated by haemorrhage, rupture, infection, or compression of adjacent organs (1),(4). Although spleen-preserving procedures such as cyst fenestration, marsupialisation, partial splenectomy, and cystectomy have been described, total splenectomy remains appropriate for giant cysts that occupy a substantial portion of the splenic parenchyma or for cases associated with hypersplenism (4).

Abu Sabha MR et al., reported a giant non-traumatic splenic pseudocyst successfully treated with cyst aspiration and partial cystectomy (4). Similar to the index patient, the lesion was large and symptomatic; however, hypersplenism-related pancytopenia and initial diagnostic confusion with a pancreatic pseudocyst were not prominent features. A recently reported giant splenic pseudocyst on Radiopaedia also demonstrated a large cystic splenic lesion with internal debris and peripheral calcification (5). Foregut duplication cyst was not considered because lesions are bounded by gastrointestinal epithelium (6), which is absent from our specimen. A thorough histologic examination did not reveal an epithelial lining, ruling out a true splenic cyst.

Another important finding was the presence of anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and leucopenia. Normal coagulation parameters and liver function tests excluded alternative causes of cytopenias, while histopathological evidence of marked splenic congestion provided a plausible explanation and supported the diagnosis of hypersplenism. The marked improvement in haemoglobin, leucocyte count, and platelet count at four-week follow-up following splenectomy further supported hypersplenism as the cause of the preoperative cytopenias.

Conclusion

Non-traumatic splenic pseudocysts are uncommon and can present challenges with diagnosis due to their resemblance to pancreatic pseudocysts. In cases of presumed pancreatic pseudocysts, normal serum amylase and lipase levels should warrant a consideration of alternate diagnoses. For cystic lesions in the left upper quadrant, CECT can identify the organ of origin and guide management. However, the definitive diagnosis can only be made with histopathological examination.

References

1.
Soria-Céspedes D, Leuchter-Ibarra J, Ventura-Molina V. Nontraumatic splenic pseudocyst. Case report. Cir Cir. 2011;79(6):553-56. English, Spanish. PMID: 22169374.
2.
Walczyk J, Walas MK. Standards of the polish ultrasound Society - update. Spleen examination. J Ultrason. 2013;13(52):50-64. Doi: 10.15557/JoU.2013.0004. Epub 2013 Mar 30. PMID: 26672802; PMCID: PMC4613573.
3.
Lee HJ, Kim JW, Hong JH, Kim GS, Shin SS, Heo SH, et al. Cross-sectional imaging of splenic lesions. Radiographics. 2018;38(2):435-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Abu Sabha MR, Thalji M, Abu Laila K, Alhashlamoun M, Abu Rumaila A, Bannoura S. A giant non-traumatic splenic pseudocyst successfully treated with cyst aspiration and partial cystectomy: A case report and review of literature. Cureus. 2024;16(5):e61110. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.61110. PMID: 38919238; PMCID: PMC11197975. [crossref]
5.
Ranchod A. Giant splenic pseudocyst. Case study. Radiopaedia.org (Accessed on 15 Jul 2026). https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-167587. [crossref]
6.
Theodosopoulos T, Marinis A, Karapanos K, Vassilikostas G, Dafnios N, Samanides L, et al. Foregut duplication cysts of the stomach with respiratory epithelium. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(8):1279-81. Doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13. i8.1279. PMID: 17451215; PMCID: PMC4147009[crossref]. [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/91298.24371

Date of Submission: Jun 16, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Jul 11, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 28, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 22, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 23, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 25, 2026 (1%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com