Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 169048

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : SD10 - SD12 Full Version

A Rare Case Report of Neonatal Pneumoperitoneum Leading to Pneumoscrotum


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/78441.24296
Sai Bhavani Manchineni, Sagar Karotkar, Mahaveer Lakhra, Ravi Reddy, Chaitanya Kumar Javvaji

1. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Postgraduate Student, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sagar Karotkar,
Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha-442107, Maharashtra, India.
Email: dr.sagarkarotkar@gmail.com

Abstract

The collection of air in the scrotal area is known as a pneumoscrotum. It is uncommon for pneumoperitoneum and pneumoscrotum to coexist, which presents challenges for diagnosis and treatment. Air in the scrotum as a concurrent sign is rare and patient typically exhibits symptoms of intraperitoneal sepsis. An unusual and serious ailment is in which a newborn has acute swelling of the scrotum that usually includes testicular torsion, trauma, inguinal hernia, hydrocele and, rarely, intestinal perforation or adrenal haemorrhage. Acute scrotum in an emergency needs attention. Neonates undergoing rigorous resuscitation or mechanical ventilation, as well as those with significant respiratory distress, may also exhibit this condition. The simultaneous occurrence of pneumoperitoneum and pneumoscrotum in a newborn is even more uncommon. Hereby, the authors present a case of one-day-old male neonate born by normal vaginal delivery who cried immediately after birth. The baby initially presented with respiratory distress and mild scrotal swelling. The antenatal scan had shown enlarged genitals with echogenic debris and calcifications. Evaluation for increasing scrotal swelling and progressive abdominal distension revealed gas under diaphragm and pneumoscrotum. Surgical exploration showed a wide perforation in transverse colon. The postoperative course was uneventful. A properly done radiological examination can help detect and identify the pathology and determine the source of an acute scrotum. The purpose of the present study is to present and assess the authors approach to treating pneumoperitoneum and provide insight into its presence in newborns and infants.

Keywords

Computed tomography, Necrotising enterocolitis, Spontaneous intestinal perforation, X-ray

Case Report

A 2.5 kg one-day-old male neonate, born to a G2A1 mother at 37 weeks gestational age via normal vaginal delivery, was admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with respiratory distress and mild scrotal enlargement. The neonate cried immediately after birth. An antenatal scan at 36.5 weeks gestation {by Last Menstrual Period (LMP)} showed enlarged genitals with echogenic debris and calcifications, along with severe oligohydramnios (liquor index 4.8). He passed meconium within few hours of birth and enteral feeds were started, which were well-tolerated.

The neonate developed generalised abdominal distension of the abdomen that was tense and gradually increasing in size. The distension was associated with gradually enlarging scrotal swelling. Reddish-green gastric aspirates were noted via the orogastric tube, hence, the child was kept Nil By Mouth (NBM). There were no maternal co-morbidities, and the mother was not on any antenatal medications.

On examination, the baby was irritable and tachypnoeic with mild intercostal retractions. Heart rate was 156 beats/min, respiratory rate 68/min. Downe’s score was 4, hence child was placed on nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for four hours after birth. Abdomen was distended and tense, with audible bowel sounds. A large, irreducible, soft swelling that extended proximally to the inguinal area was present at the scrotum. The skin over the scrotum appeared glossy and discoloured (Table/Fig 1). It was not possible to palpate both testes. Transillumination test was positive (Table/Fig 2).

Laboratory parameters showed Haemoglobin (Hb): 22.2 g/dL, Total Leucocyte Count (TLC): 10,100/mm³, C-reactive Protein (CRP): negative and the initial septic screen was negative.

A chest X-ray was done in view of respiratory distress, showed right upper lobe consolidation suggestive of congenital pneumonia. Antibiotics were started: injection Ampicillin 50 mg/kg/dose 6-hourly,

injection Gentamicin 5 mg/kg/day and later injection Metronidazole 7.5 mg/kg/dose 8-hourly was added in view of increasing abdominal distension (Table/Fig 3).

Ultrasound of the abdomen suggested bilateral hydrocele with suspicion of periorchitis. Due to the increasing size of scrotum and progressive abdominal distension, a repeat X-ray and Computed Tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis was done which was suggestive of gross pneumoperitoneum with scrotal collection of air-fluid levels, suggestive of pneumoscrotum (Table/Fig 4), (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6).

With the suspicion of gut perforation, the neonate was referred to a paediatric surgeon and a laparotomy was performed. A wide perforation measuring around 2-3 cm at the level of transverse colon. As it was difficult in approximating the structures due to wide perforation, transverse loop colostomy was done. The fluid showed growth of Staphylococcus aureus. Rest of the peritoneal cavity appeared clean and the remaining gut was healthy. Baby was allowed orally on 6th postoperative day. Currently, the baby is on full feeds with no postoperative complications. The patient was successfully discharged and followed up after one week and baby is doing well haemodynamically. The patient was discharged from the hospital and referred to a paediatric surgeon for surgical management.

Discussion

An air build-up in the scrotal area is known as a pneumoscrotum. Although neonatal pneumoscrotum is recognised as a rare clinical entity and exact incidence and prevalence data are lacking due to its infrequent occurrence and reliance on case reports. A 2010 report described a neonate with pneumoscrotum secondary to gastric perforation (1). Another case involved a neonate developing pneumoscrotum following resuscitation, leading to pneumothorax, pneumoperitoneum and subcutaneous emphysema (2).

Its source may be localised, such as testicular torsion, trauma, or adrenal haemorrhage, or it may be extra- or intraperitoneal (3). Neonates undergoing rigorous resuscitation or mechanical ventilation, as well as those with significant respiratory distress, may also exhibit it.

Bowel perforation: This is the most common cause in neonates, often resulting from conditions like Necrotising Enterocolitis (NEC) or other intestinal problems.

Intra-abdominal or thoracic conditions: Air can track from the abdomen or chest cavity into the scrotum.

Infections: Gas-producing infections, like Fournier’s gangrene, can also cause pneumoscrotum.

Trauma: Direct trauma to the scrotum may introduce air.

Iatrogenic causes: Air can be introduced during surgical procedures or diagnostic interventions.

Bronchopleural fistula: A rare cause is a fistula (abnormal connection) between the lung and chest wall allows air to leak into the scrotum (4),(5),(6),(7).

Pneumoperitoneum typically indicates perforation of an intra-abdominal organ and usually necessitates emergency laparotomy. While it is primarily of perforating origin, it can also be idiopathic or bacterial. Seldom occurring and posing serious diagnosis and treatment issues is the combination of pneumoperitoneum and pneumoscrotum is rare in neonates and poses serious diagnostic and treatment challenges, particularly of bacterial aetiology (6). In some cases, scrotal exploration is needed to diagnose and treat neonates with idiopathic causes (8).

Air leak syndromes, characterised by air escaping into tissues where it is not normally present, can result from alveolar rupture, gastrointestinal perforation, open cranial wounds, or iatrogenic causes. These syndromes may occur in babies with vigorous respiration at birth or due to high mechanical ventilator pressures during the treatment for conditions like respiratory distress syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, birth asphyxia, vigorous cardiopulmonary resuscitation by untrained staff or due to gastrointestinal ischaemia, or congenital/acquired obstruction (1),(2).

Pneumoperitoneum in babies can present in various ways, ranging from a sick infant with evident abdominal signs to a stable newborn with minimal or no abdominal symptoms. It is most commonly a symptom of gastrointestinal perforation, though, rarely, it may result from extra-abdominal causes. Benign pneumoperitoneum, with no surgical or medical cause, is very infrequent (1). The co-existence of pneumoscrotum and pneumoperitoneum is particularly rare in neonates.

Khan YA and Akhtar J reported a similar case of day 4, term neonate brought with fever and scrotal swelling. When the peritoneal cavity was explored, two small perforations along the greater curvature of the posterior stomach were identified (1).

Another case of a three day-old male infant with basithoracic subcutaneous emphysema and left inguino-scrotal oedema, along with a skin ulceration was reported by Bonny R et al., following surgery, an examination revealed a large air bubble in the left inguino-scrotal area, a substantial scrotal haematoma and Klebsiella pneumonia growth. They concluded that it was bacterial in origin (6).

Kouame YGS et al., reported a case of a 4-day-old neonate presenting with inguinal ecchymosis and an acute scrotum, which was found to be associated with an adrenal gland haematoma (3). Adding to the similarity to the present case, it was noted that in this case the perforation likely happened antenatally as seen in the antenatal ultrasound.

Pneumoscrotum can originate from three sources: extra-peritoneal, intra-peritoneal, or local. In cases of thoracic trauma, pneumothorax, or pneumomediastinum, extra-peritoneal air may spread from the thorax. Intra-peritoneal air is often due to perforation of a hollow organ, while local origins include direct trauma to the scrotum or gas production by bacteria, leading to diffusion through subcutaneous tissues (6).

Diagnosis of pneumoscrotum involves palpation of the scrotum, with X-rays used to detect and locate the air. Ultrasound can reveal infections such as epididymitis or abscesses, while Doppler tests assess the vascularisation of the spermatic cord (2),(9).

Prematurity, infection and severe birth asphyxia are the primary risk factors linked to ischemic stomach perforations in neonates (10). Management is surgical if the pneumoscrotum is due to bowel perforation or other severe conditions, surgery is often required to repair the damage and address the underlying cause (5). If infection is suspected, antibiotics may be administered. Depending on the underlying cause, additional supportive measures, such as ventilation or fluid resuscitation, may be necessary. Pneumoscrotum is often the primary and discernible sign of bowel perforation in preterm neonates and serves as a crucial radiographic sign for timely diagnosis (11).

At presentation, the patient had scrotal swelling with palpable crepitus and associated abdominal signs suggestive of peritonitis. Given the presence of pneumoscrotum, a rare but important clinical finding, the provisional diagnosis considered was a hollow viscus perforation leading to pneumoperitoneum with air tracking into the scrotum. Differential diagnoses included thoracic sources such as pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax causing subcutaneous emphysema extending to the scrotum, especially in ventilated or trauma patients. Local causes, such as gas-forming infections (e.g., Fournier’s gangrene), scrotal trauma, or post-procedural air introduction, were also considered. However, the absence of chest symptoms, local signs of infection, or recent instrumentation made these less likely. Imaging confirmed free intraperitoneal air with evidence of air tracking through the inguinal canal, supporting a gastrointestinal perforation as the primary pathology, which was intraoperatively confirmed to be a perforation in the transverse colon.

Conclusion

It is very uncommon for a neonate to have both pneumoscrotum and pneumoperitoneum. Neonates are more likely than older infants to present with pneumoperitoneum. Prenatal bowel perforations should be suspected based on the presentation at delivery. The coexistence of pneumoperitoneum and pneumoscrotum of bacterial aetiology is rare and may be difficult to diagnose because it can mimic other conditions. Acute scrotal swelling or pain in neonates should always be investigated with an abdomen and scrotal ultrasonography to ensure timely and accurate diagnosis.

References

1.
Khan YA, Akhtar J. Pneumoscrotum: A rare presentation of gastric perforation in a neonate. APSP J Case Rep. 2010;1:15.
2.
Soni JP, Choudhary S, Makwana M. Air leak syndromes: A rare case of pneumoscrotum in a neonate. Int J Clin Pediatr [Internet]. 2015;4(2-3):166-67. [cited 2024 Nov 30]. Available from: https://www.theijcp.org/index.php/ijcp/ article/view/224. [crossref]
3.
Kouame YGS, Moulot MO, Enache T, Konan JM, Agbara K, Ehua M, et al. Adrenal gland hematoma presenting as an acute scrotum in a neonate. Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports [Internet]. 2022;76:102133. [cited 2024 Nov 30]. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213576621003547. [crossref]
4.
Angurana SK, Kanojia RP, Peruri G, Sundaram V. Pneumoscrotum as a presentation of necrotising enterocolitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:bcr2018227300, bcr-2018- 227300. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Dagur G, Lee MY, Warren K, Imhof R, Khan SA. Critical manifestations of pneumoscrotum. Curr Urol [Internet]. 2016;9(2):62-66. [cited 2025 Apr 17]. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/01330296-201609020-00002. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Bonny R, Moh EN, Aké YL, Kouassi AS, Midékor K, Kouao JP, et al. Extensive pneumoscrotum and pneumoperitoneum simulating a compound inguino scrotal hernia in a neonate. Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports. 2017;18:16-18. [cited 2024 Nov 30]. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S2213576616302135. [crossref]
7.
Noujeim JP, Ibrahim S, Noujeim A, Haddad Y. Pneumoscrotum caused by a bronchopleural fistula. Cureus. 2021;13:e17270. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Okamoto T, Kajiwara S, Sekito S, Shibahara T, Onishi T. Neonatal adrenal hemorrhage presenting as an acute scrotum: A case report on the rare presentation of right adrenal hemorrhage and contralateral left scrotal hematoma. IJU Case Reports. 2022;5:427-30. [cited 2024 Nov 30]. Available from: https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iju5.12495. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Ibrahim AI, Ahmed EA. Tapping for pneumoperitoneum in neonates and infants. Annals of Pediatric Surgery. 2013;9:47-53. [cited 2024 Nov 30]. Available from: https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01287829-201304000-00001. [crossref]
10.
Akcora B, Eris O. A newborn with duodenal atresia and a gastric perforation. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010;7:33. [cited 2024 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www. afrjpaedsurg.org/text.asp?2010/7/1/33/59359. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Su PC, Chang YT. Spontaneous intestinal perforation manifested as pneumoscrotum in a preterm neonate. Pediatr Neonatol. 2024;65(5):517-18. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187595722 4000871. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/78441.24296

Date of Submission: Feb 03, 2025
Date of Peer Review: Mar 12, 2025
Date of Acceptance: Jun 19, 2025
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 04, 2025
• Manual Googling: Jun 15, 2025
• iThenticate Software: Jun 17, 2025 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com