Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 660379

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : SC01 - SC04 Full Version

Post-COVID-19 Three-year Trends of Clinical Profile and Outcome of Infants (1-12 months) Hospitalised at the Paediatric Department of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of Gujarat, Western India: A Retrospective Study


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/89943.24300
Prapti R Chaudhari, Nirali M Sheth, Dipkala Jayswal, Rahul Tandon, Saumya K Shah, Krutika Rahul Tandon

1. 3rd Year Postgraduate Student, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. 3. Ex-Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. 5. 2nd Year Postgraduate Student, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. 6. Professor and Former Head, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Krutika Rahul Tandon,
E-702, Sahjanand Status Co-operative Society, Opp. J V Patel ITI College, Anand-Sojitra Road, Karamsad-388325, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: krutikatandon2023@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The post-neonatal period (1-12 months) also represents a critical vulnerability window in child health. Despite substantial global progress in reducing under-five mortality, infant hospitalisations beyond the neonatal period continue to pose considerable challenges, particularly in developing countries where 10-15% of hospitalised infants succumb to preventable conditions. Understanding the clinical profile, temporal trends, and outcomes of hospitalised infants is essential for both, clinicians as well as administrators or policymakers.

Aim: To study the 3-year trends of clinical profile and outcome of infants (beyond Neonatal Period) hospitalised at tertiary care teaching hospital after the end of the “Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic”.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Paediatrics, Shree Krishna Hospital, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India over three years (July 2022 to June 2025). All consecutive indoor infants aged 1-12 months during the study period were included. The demographic details and clinical details including outcome were retrieved from medical records and pertinent information collected using a predesigned, structured proforma. Data were analysed using appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical methods.

Results: A total of 177 infants were enrolled (Year-wise n=78, 76 and 23, respectively). The overall study cohort showed male predominance of 114 (64.4%). Respiratory infections emerged as the leading diagnosis in 60 (33.9%), followed by cardiovascular disorders 30 (16.9%). About 64 (36.2%) required Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission with critical illnesses. Successful discharge in 151 (85.3%) and mean±SD length of stay was 6.7±8.7 days. Significant relationship was found in trends for increasing prematurity (1.3% to 17.4%, p-value=0.002), declining immunisation completion (65.4% to 26.1%, p-value <0.001). Socio-economic status showed highly significant associations with both outcomes (p-value=0.003) and PICU admission (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: Post-COVID-19 epidemic, 3-year trends showed the temporal trends of rising prematurity rates, declining immunisation rates, and persistent high Discharge Against Medical Advice (DAMA) rates. This study provides essential baseline data for designing evidence-based interventions at tertiary care settings that serve vulnerable populations.

Keywords

Low birth weight, Malnutrition, Prematurity, Post-COVID Era, Socio-economic determinants

Apart from neonates, infants between 1-12 months are also vulnerable as far as mortality and morbidity are concerned as this phase is characterised by unique physiological, immunological, and developmental transitions which has significant influence on them (1). Though there is trend in reduction of under-five mortality globally over the past three decades, hospitalisations beyond the neonatal period during infancy continue to pose considerable challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, with respiratory infections, gastroenteritis, and sepsis remaining the leading causes of admission across diverse geographic as well as socio-economic contexts (2).

Gujarat, despite being one of India’s more economically developed states, continues to experience infant mortality rates above the national average, with rural areas showing particularly concerning trends in hospitalisation patterns and outcomes for infants beyond the neonatal period (3). Understanding the clinical profile and outcomes of hospitalised infants beyond the neonatal period is essential for multiple stakeholders in the healthcare system. For clinicians, detailed knowledge of admission patterns, common diagnoses, and risk factors for adverse outcomes enables better triage, resource allocation, and clinical decision-making. Recent global events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, have highlighted the vulnerability of health systems and the disproportionate impact on infant health services (4),(5). The role of social determinants is of utmost importance to understand hospitalisation patterns in infants. The risk factors may include status of maternal education, household income, residence, access to clean water/sanitation and exposure to air pollution (6). In the Indian context, additional factors such as caste, gender discrimination, and cultural practices significantly influence healthcare-seeking behaviour and outcomes for hospitalised infants.

The current study aimed to generate the comprehensive data on the clinical profile and outcome of infants beyond the neonatal period admitted to the only tertiary care teaching hospital of Anand district of Gujarat in subsequent three years once the COVID-19 epidemic declared over. By analysing three years of admission data, this research can contribute to understanding temporal trends, identifying high-risk groups, and informing evidence-based strategies for improving infant health outcomes in similar settings.

Material and Methods

This retrospective study conducted at the Department of Paediatrics, Shree Krishna Hospital, a tertiary care teaching hospital affiliated with Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India from July 2022 to December 2025. The data was retrieved from medical records after obtaining approval from ethics committee with waiver of consent (IEC/BU/165/Faculty/12/221/2025 dated 5th July 2025). The study included data from three years: July 2022 to June 2025. Year-wise (Year 1: July 2022-June 2023, Year 2: July 2023-June 2024 and Year 3: July 2024-June 2025) and overall, the data was analysed in December 2025.

All infants aged 1-12 months hospitalised either in the PICU or the paediatric ward during study period were included. None were excluded from the study.

Sample size: No formal calculated sample size but whatever numbers hospitalised in the paediatric department year-wise during study period was considered as study sample.

Study Procedure

The data was collected using a predesigned, structured proforma which included the following variables: Demographic details (age, sex, socio-economic status), clinical profile including weight, date of admission, place of admission (PICU/ward), duration of hospital stay, laboratory investigations, outcome {discharge, DAMA, referral or death}.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data was analysed using STATA 18. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data. Continuous variables were expressed as Mean±Standard Deviation (SD) or Median (Interquartile Range) as appropriate, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Year-wise trends in demographics, clinical profile, and outcomes were depicted using line charts and box plots as appropriate. For studying the association between risk factors and outcomes, the Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 177 infants were hospitalised during studied period of July 2022 to June 2025. Year-wise they were 78, 76 and 23 in first, second and third years, respectively. The overall mean±SD age was 5.22±3.11 months. The overall study cohort showed male predominance of 114 (64.4%) as well as 114 (64.4%) contributed from lower/lower-middle class. Year-wise further demographic and pertinent clinical details are as per (Table/Fig 1). Year one showed the highest percentage of younger infants (1-3 months), overall male predominance, largest portion of hospitalised cohort belonged to the lower middle class/lower class, the mean±SD birth weight of infants, requirement of PICU admission, mean length of stay or outcome, if compared year-wise, there was no statistically significant difference. However, mean±SD gestational age at birth was statistically significant across the 3-years (p-value=0.039) with prematurity on rise in year-3. Also, immunisation completion rates showed a marked decline in Year 3 (p-value <0.001).

Reasons for hospitalisation or underlying diagnosis are as per (Table/Fig 2). A highly significant trend was observed across periods (p-value <0.001) where respiratory conditions proportionately declined and haematological conditions increased. As in (Table/Fig 3), haemoglobin was measured in 159 infants (89.8% of total) with a mean of 9.51±1.75 g/dL but there was no statistically significant difference observed across the years. Other common laboratory parameters are shown in (Table/Fig 3) which was also statistically not significant.

The disease severity, age, vaccination and socio-economic status appeared to be more important determinants when risk analysis done. A clear inverse relationship was observed between age and PICU admission as the youngest infants (1-3 months) had the highest PICU admission rate 67 (37.9%). A significant association was observed between PICU admission and outcome (Fisher's exact test, p-value=0.001). Risk analysis revealed that PICU admission was a highly significant risk factor for poor outcome with an OR of 5.14 (95% CI: 2.08-12.66, p-value <0.001). (Table/Fig 4) shows incomplete vaccination was markedly higher in cardiovascular admissions 7.3% vs 32.4% whereas respiratory system involvement had highly good numbers of complete vaccination status as per their age as compared to incomplete status (41.3% vs 20.6%). Lower middle/Lower SE class infants had the highest PICU admissions (63.2%, n=72/114). History of NICU admissions was also an important risk factor of PICU admission as statistically significant difference found between the groups (p=0.044).

Discussion

The present study exclusively enrolled infants aged 1-12 months, with a mean±SD age of 5.22±3.11 months. This age distribution reflects the vulnerability window for severe paediatric illness. The concentration of cases in the 2-6 month age range reflects probably the immunological transition period when maternal antibodies wane and infant immunity remain immature, as demonstrated by Zimmermann P and Curtis N (7). Even Killien EY et al., conducted epidemiological studies from the United States examining paediatric intensive care admissions from 2001-2019 and found that infants under 12 months consistently comprised the highest proportion of critical care admissions, representing approximately 40-45% of all paediatric ICU cases (8).

During COVID-19 epidemic, there was significant decrease in social gatherings. However, once the restriction was lifted back and epidemic declared over there was normalisation of all routine activities gradually. However, it was the author’s experience that there was sudden increase in admissions of infants in the department as compared to previous years. The 3rd year of studied period showed significant decrease in admissions, probably due to decrease in births of newborns in the region or less numbers of newborns now requiring NICU admissions or less numbers are referred to this tertiary care hospital as cost of treatment in PICU was not covered under any scheme.

In the present study, the male predominance (1.8:1) was noted which represented a striking gender disparity that warrants careful consideration. This finding exceeds the typical male: female admission ratios reported in most paediatric studies, which generally range from 1.2:1 to 1.5:1, as documented by Kannan C and Iyengar K (9). Multiple hypotheses may explain this observation but further discussion is beyond the scope. Approximately, 35-40% of study cohort had birth weights below 2.5 kg, qualifying as LBW. This finding carries enormous implications for subsequent growth and development. Low birth weight represents one of the most powerful predictors of infant morbidity and mortality globally. Christian P et al., established through multiple longitudinal studies that LBW infants face elevated risks of failure to thrive, developmental delays, impaired immune function, and chronic diseases, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease in adulthood (10). The socio-economic profile of the present cohort reveals profound disadvantage as 64.4% of families belonged to lower or lower-middle socio-economic classes. These socio-economic characteristics are inextricably linked to the health outcomes observed in current study and literature also says that socio-economic status as one of the most powerful determinants of child health outcomes. Crear-Perry J et al., quantified that infants born to mothers in the lowest socio-economic quintile face 2.5-3.0 times higher mortality risk compared to highest quintile, even within the same geographic region (11). This striking disparity suggests that lower socio-economic groups present with more severe illness, likely due to delayed healthcare seeking, inadequate preventive care, and poorer baseline nutrition. One-third of current study cohort (64 patients, 36.2%) required PICU admission during hospitalisation, indicating high illness severity and substantial critical care resource utilisation. This PICU admission rate substantially exceeds most reported paediatric hospital-based studies. Killien EY et al., documented that ICU admissions comprised approximately 8-12% of all paediatric hospitalisations (8). Amare AT et al., conducted a 2023 cross-sectional study from a resource-limited setting examining paediatric ICU outcomes and documented 41.7% mortality among 396 PICU patients, substantially higher than high-income country benchmarks of 4-8% (12). While the present study did not explicitly report ICU-specific mortality, the overall DAMA rate of 14.7% (26 patients) among ICU patients suggests concerning outcomes. Hwang SW et al., showed that DAMA in critically-ill patients typically portends very poor outcomes, with mortality rates exceeding 50-70% in most series (13). The specific indications for PICU admission in present cohort encompassed respiratory conditions, septic shock, Multi-Organ Dysfunction (MODS), postoperative cardiac monitoring and status epilepticus. This diagnostic distribution aligns with international paediatric ICU literature. Typpo KV et al., also identified respiratory failure as the most common indication for paediatric ICU admission, followed by shock, postoperative care, and neurological emergencies (14). Respiratory conditions/infections emerged as the dominant diagnosis category in the present study cohort, accounting for 60 of 177 cases (33.9%) especially with increased preterm in later year, establishing them as the leading cause of infant hospitalisation in spite of complete vaccination status in earlier years underscores the severity and resource intensity of managing these conditions. The striking feature of incomplete immunisation seen in Congenital Heart Disease (CHD), which was the second most common diagnosis affecting 30 (16.95%) patients. The probable reason for such higher number of CHDs in this study was that the study setting had well developed paediatric cardiac centre. In the present study, anaemia burden was also quite high and it was 89.3% (n=142/159) of varying severity among tested patients with moderate to severe anaemia in 60.4% (n=96/159). Bharati P et al., and Kapil U et al., documented anaemia prevalence ranging from 65-85% among hospitalised infants in India, with mean haemoglobin values of 9.0-10.5 g/dL (15),(16). The most concerning findings in this study was the DAMA rate of 14.7% (26 patients), with an increasing trend 14.1% ? 14.5% ? 17.3% which reflected probably growing financial pressures on families, increasing healthcare costs, or deteriorating provider-family communication after COVID-19 epidemic but the DAMA rate of 14.7% was higher than the previous published study from Riyadh (17). Albalawi M et al., conducted a 2024 comprehensive 10-year retrospective analysis examining paediatric DAMA in a tertiary care centre and documented a DAMA rate of 0.4%, with significant predictors including age, presence of a chronic illness or severe baseline condition and history of previous DAMA (17). In the present study, the mean±SD length of stay was 6.7±8.7 days with a range of 0-63 days. This distribution demonstrates typical right-skewing, with most infants requiring brief admissions but a subset experiencing prolonged hospitalisations. In current study cohort, review of the longest-stay cases revealed complex CHD awaiting surgery, severe PEM requiring nutritional rehabilitation, CNS infections with complications, and chronic conditions, including subdural empyema status-post neurosurgery. The correlation between increasing DAMA rate and changing length of stay suggests possible causal relationships; longer required hospitalisations may trigger more DAMAs due to accumulating costs and family pressures.

Limitation(s)

The main limitation of this study was retrospective and record-based study and its result cannot be generalised as it is single centre. Also, causes of DAMA not evaluated extensively.

Conclusion

This study provides first regional data of infants hospitalised beyond neonatal period subsequent to the end of COVID-19 pandemic at the tertiary care teaching hospital of the Anand District which is the only medical college of this district. The present study documents a paediatric population facing enormous health challenges, with respiratory infections, malnutrition, anaemia, CHD, and socio-economic disadvantage combining to create significant infant morbidity. The high-quality data captured in this study provide evidences for regional intervention or policy advocacy to improve outcomes for the most vulnerable infants. This alarming decline in complete immunisation in period of three years represents a critical public health concern requiring immediate attention and intervention strategies.

References

1.
Perin J, Mulick A, Yeung D, Villavicencio F, Lopez G, Strong KL, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–19: An updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6(2):106-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Molokhia M, Wang Y, GBD 2019 Under-5 Mortality Collaborators. Global, regional, and national progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 for neonatal and child health: All-cause and cause-specific mortality findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021;398(10303):870-905. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Troeger C, Blacker BF, Khalil IA, Rao PC, Cao S, Zimsen SR, et al. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(11):1211-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Roberton T, Carter ED, Chou VB, Stegmuller AR, Jackson BD, Tam Y, et al. Early estimates of the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries: A modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(7):e901-e908. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Williams TC, MacRae C, Swann OV, Haseeb H, Cunningham S, Davies P, et al. Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric healthcare use and severe disease: A retrospective national cohort study. Arch Dis Child. 2021;106(9):911-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Spencer N, Raman S, O’Hare B, Tamburlini G. Addressing inequities in child health and development: Towards social justice. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019;3(1):e000503. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Factors that influence the immune response to vaccination. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(2):e00084-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Killien EY, Keller MR, Watson RS, Hartman ME. Epidemiology of intensive care admissions for children in the US from 2001 to 2019. JAMA Paediatr. 2023;177(5):506-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Kannan C, Iyengar K. Gender disparity in paediatric hospital admissions: A systematic review. Indian Paediatr. 2022;59(8):634-42.
10.
Christian P, Lee SE, Donahue AM, Adair LS, Arifeen SE, Ashorn P, et al. Risk of childhood undernutrition related to small-for-gestational age and preterm birth in low-and middle-income countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(5):1340-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Crear-Perry J, Correa-de-Araujo R, Lewis Johnson T, McLemore MR, Neilson E, Wallace M. Social and structural determinants of health inequities in maternal health. J Womens Health. 2021;30(2):230-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Amare AT, Wubie WT, Aynalem YA. Factors associated with the outcome of paedi atric patients admitted to intensive care unit. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:793-802.
13.
Hwang SW, Li J, Gupta R, Chien V, Martin RE. What happens to patients who leave hospital against medical advice? Can Med Assoc J. 2003;168(4):417-20.
14.
Typpo KV, Petersen NJ, Hallman DM, Markovitz BP, Mariscalco MM. Day 1 multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is associated with poor functional outcome and mortality in the paediatric intensive care unit. Paediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10(5):562-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Bharati P, Shome S, Chakrabarty S, Bharati S, Pal M. Burden of anemia and its socioeconomic determinants among adolescent girls in India. Food Nutr Bull. 2022;43(1):48-60.
16.
Kapil U, Kapil R, Gupta A. National Iron Plus Initiative: Current status and future strategy. Indian J Med Res. 2019;150(3):239-47. [crossref]
17.
Albalawi M, Sadler K, Abudari G, Alhuthil RT, Alyami HH, Alharbi AH, et al. Discharge against medical advice in paediatrics: A 10-year retrospective analysis in a tertiary care center. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2024;44(6):377-85 [crossref]. [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/89943.24300

Date of Submission: Apr 22, 2026
Date of Peer Review: May 25, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 15, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep, 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No (waiver)
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 11, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 11, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 13, 2026 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com