Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 179677

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : RD01 - RD04 Full Version

Tubercular Cold Abscess Mimicking Baker’s Cyst: A Rare Case of Posterior Knee Swelling


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/89268.24348
VS Ambrish, J Lionel John, Arivoli

1. Third Year Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. VS Ambrish,
J-309, 3rd Floor, The Royal Castle Apartment, Thirumudivakkam, Chennai-600044, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: ambrishbalakarthik2107@gmail.com

Abstract

Musculoskeletal tuberculosis is usually not a common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis which often presents with an atypical clinical features, resulting in delayed or missed diagnosis. Tubercular cold abscesses typically lack classical signs of inflammation and may clinically mimic benign cystic conditions. Posterior knee swelling is most commonly attributed to Baker’s cyst; however, in tuberculosis-endemic regions, infective aetiologies should be considered when the presentation is atypical or fails to respond to conventional treatment. Hereby, the authors report a case of a 67-year-old female who presented with a chief complaints of swelling over the posterior aspect of the knee since two years which was gradually progressive, associated with pain and restriction of knee normal range of movements. She was initially managed as a Baker’s cyst with repeated aspirations and intra-articular steroid injections, which provided only temporary relief. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) report showing a well-defined cystic lesion suggestive of a Baker’s cyst. Due to persistent symptoms and progressive enlargement, surgical excision was performed. Histopathological examination demonstrated granulomatous inflammation, and microbiological examination such as GeneXpert confirmed Mycobacterium tuberculosis with rifampicin resistance. The patient was initiated on appropriate antitubercular therapy and showed significant clinical improvement with no recurrence in six-month follow-up. The present case highlights the importance of considering tuberculosis in the differential diagnosis of persistent or atypical posterior knee swellings. Imaging alone will not be enough in arriving clinical diagnosis, may be misleading, and definitive diagnosis requires histopathological and microbiological confirmation. Early surgical intervention combined with appropriate therapy ensures favourable outcomes and prevents complications.

Keywords

Antitubercular agent, Extrapulmonary tuberculosis, Granulomatous inflammation, Knee joint, Magnetic resonance imaging

Case Report

A 67-year-old female came with chief complaints of swelling over the posterior aspect of left knee since two years. Initially, the swelling was small and painless, but it progressively increased in size over the last one year, with more rapid progression in the preceding six months. The swelling was associated with pain during walking, squatting, and prolonged standing, leading in functional limitation. She was a known hypertensive since 10 years, on regular medication. Her body weight was 58 kg, and she appeared moderately built with no clinical evidence of malnutrition. She belonged to a lower socioeconomic background. There was no history of diabetes mellitus, bronchial asthma, prior tuberculosis, seizures, or previous surgery. She was not immunocompromised, had no history of long-term systemic steroid use, and no known contact with tuberculosis in the past.

The patient had been diagnosed with bilateral knee osteoarthritis three years ago and was managed conservatively with physiotherapy and three intra-articular corticosteroid injections were administered over four months (approximately 8-12 months before presentation), which provided only temporary relief. Despite this, the swelling persisted and gradually enlarged over a period of time. Approximately six months prior to presentation, two aspirations were performed at a government hospital; however, no definitive diagnosis was concluded, and the patient was lost to follow-up thereafter. She also reported intermittent low-grade fever for 10 days prior to presentation, with no history of weight loss or night sweats.

On examination, a diffuse swelling measuring approximately about 20×20 cm was noted over the posterior aspect of the left knee, extending from the popliteal fossa to the upper calf region (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3). The swelling was tense, cystic in consistency, and non mobile. The overlying skin appeared stretched and shiny, with no local rise of temperature, sinus formation, or discharge. The swelling was non reducible and did not vary with knee flexion or extension. Transillumination test was negative, and there was no evidence of joint effusion, patellar tap test-negative. Knee movements were restricted, with flexion limited to 90° and a fixed flexion deformity of approximately 20°.

Laboratory investigations revealed elevated C-reactive protein (4.6 mg/dL) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (58 mm/hour). Complete blood count showed mild anaemia (Hb: 10.2 g/dL) with relative lymphocytosis. Serum albumin was 3.2 g/dL, suggestive of borderline nutritional status. Mantoux test was positive (15 mm induration at 48-72 hours). Sputum examination for acid-fast bacilli was negative, and HIV serology-non reactive. Chest radiograph showed no evidence of pulmonary tuberculosis. Baseline liver and renal function tests were under normal limits.

The MRI of the knee demonstrated degenerative changes consistent with osteoarthritis, with preserved joint space and no significant bony erosions. There were associated bone marrow oedema and meniscal and ligamentous injuries. A large, well-defined cystic lesion was noted extending along the gastrocnemius muscle, appearing hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images, consistent with fluid content. No internal septations, debris, or solid components were identified. Post-contrast imaging showed peripheral rim enhancement without significant internal enhancement. These imaging features were suggestive of a Baker’s cyst, with no definitive radiological features to indicate infective aetiology such as tuberculosis.

Based on the clinical presentation of a chronic cystic swelling in the popliteal region and corresponding imaging findings, differential diagnoses included Baker’s cyst, which is the most common cause of posterior knee swelling and was strongly suggested on MRI. Other considerations were chronic bursitis involving the gastrocnemius-semimembranosus bursa, synovial or ganglion cyst, and soft-tissue tumours such as lipoma or synovial sarcoma in view of the large size and progressive nature of the swelling. Vascular causes such as popliteal artery aneurysm and conditions like deep vein thrombosis were also considered and clinically excluded. In view of the chronicity and endemic setting, infective aetiologies, particularly a tubercular cold abscess, were included as a differential diagnosis, although not initially favoured based on imaging findings.

Surgery was performed under spinal anaesthesia with tourniquet control. A thick-walled cyst was identified in the popliteal fossa following surgical exposure (Table/Fig 4). Careful dissection was performed to separate the lesion from surrounding soft-tissues using retractors (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5). On incision of the cyst, thick caseous material mixed with turbid fluid was encountered, suggestive of a chronic infective pathology (Table/Fig 6). The cyst wall was completely excised along with its pedunculated attachment. Thorough wound lavage was performed, and the cavity was inspected for any residual tissue. No intraoperative complications were encountered. The wound closed in layers, and a suction drain was placed. Histopathological examination revealed areas of caseous necrosis with granulomatous inflammation and multinucleated giant cells, consistent with tuberculosis. Intraoperative specimens, including cyst contents, were sent for microbiological analysis. Smear examination was positive for acid-fast bacilli (Table/Fig 7)a-c. GeneXpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis / Rifampin (Rifampicin) (MTB/RIF) detected mycobacterium tuberculosis with rifampicin resistance. Mycobacterial culture using the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system subsequently confirmed the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Drug susceptibility testing demonstrated resistance to rifampicin, while susceptibility to isoniazid, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, and tested second-line drugs was preserved.

Following microbiological confirmation, the patient underwent evaluation for concomitant pulmonary tuberculosis. Clinical respiratory assessment revealed no respiratory symptoms, chest radiography showed no evidence of active pulmonary tuberculosis, and sputum examination for acid-fast bacilli was negative. The findings were therefore consistent with isolated extrapulmonary musculoskeletal tuberculosis. In view of the ongoing global burden of tuberculosis and the increasing recognition of drug-resistant forms of the disease, the patient was classified as having Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis (RR-TB) and managed according to current WHO recommendations (1),(2).

The patient was initiated on a World Health Organisation (WHO)-recommended longer all-oral regimen for RR-TB, comprising Bedaquiline, Levofloxacin, Linezolid, Clofazimine, and Cycloserine, along with Pyridoxine supplementation. The planned duration of therapy was 18-20 months, with close monitoring of treatment response, drug tolerance, and adverse effects in accordance with current WHO recommendations for the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis (2).

The postoperative period was uneventful. Serial postoperative wound assessments demonstrated satisfactory healing with progressive improvement in the appearance of the surgical scar on postoperative day 2 (Table/Fig 8)a, postoperative day 5 (Table/Fig 8)b, postoperative day 9 (Table/Fig 8)c, and postoperative day 12 (Table/Fig 8)d. At six-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic with no evidence of recurrence. Functional outcome assessment showed significant improvement, with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score improving from 7/10 preoperatively to 1/10 postoperatively. Knee range of motion improved to 0-120°, with no residual fixed flexion deformity. The patient continues on antitubercular therapy with planned long-term follow-up for treatment completion and surveillance for recurrence.

Discussion

Musculoskeletal tuberculosis continues to pose a significant diagnostic challenge because of its indolent clinical course and ability to mimic a variety of benign and malignant musculoskeletal conditions. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, delayed diagnosis remains common, particularly in cases presenting without constitutional symptoms or classical radiological findings (1),(2).

Lidder S et al., reported a patient with knee tuberculosis who presented with chronic pain, swelling, and progressive restriction of joint movements, initially leading to diagnostic uncertainty because of the non-specific presentation (3). Similar to their findings, this patient had a prolonged history of swelling for two years with progressive pain and restriction of knee movements. However, unlike the case reported by Lidder S et al., this patient presented predominantly as a large posterior cystic swelling clinically and radiologically suggestive of a Baker’s cyst rather than classical tuberculous arthritis. In both cases, definitive diagnosis was ultimately established through histopathological and microbiological evaluation rather than imaging alone (3). Mahajan NP et al., described an aggressive form of knee tuberculosis characterised by extensive synovial involvement, persistent symptoms, and progressive functional impairment requiring open subtotal synovectomy followed by antitubercular therapy (4). Their patient demonstrated substantial symptomatic improvement after surgical intervention. Similarly, this patient had persistent symptoms despite repeated aspirations and intra-articular corticosteroid injections and eventually required complete surgical excision of the lesion. In both cases, surgery served not only a therapeutic role but also provided tissue for definitive diagnosis. Unlike the synovial disease described by Mahajan NP et al., this patient had a large cold abscess occupying the popliteal region with no obvious preoperative evidence of extensive articular destruction (4).

Kotikalapudi S et al., reported latent reactivation of osteoarticular tuberculosis of the knee in a patient presenting with chronic monoarthritis without evidence of active pulmonary tuberculosis (5). The authors emphasised the ability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to remain dormant for prolonged periods before reactivation. Similar findings were observed in our patient, who had no evidence of pulmonary tuberculosis on chest radiography and sputum examination. Furthermore, repeated intra-articular corticosteroid injections may have contributed to local immunosuppression and disease progression, a mechanism that has also been implicated in reactivation of latent tuberculous infection (5).

The radiological findings in the present case were particularly deceptive. Abid W et al., highlighted that musculoskeletal tuberculosis may demonstrate highly variable MRI appearances and frequently mimics inflammatory, degenerative, or cystic conditions (6). In the patient of present case, MRI demonstrated a well-defined cystic lesion extending along the gastrocnemius muscle with imaging characteristics strongly suggestive of a Baker’s cyst. The absence of classical features such as extensive synovial thickening, bone erosions, or marked joint destruction contributed significantly to the initial misdiagnosis. This observation is consistent with the findings of Abid W et al., who emphasised that imaging findings should always be interpreted in conjunction with clinical and microbiological data (6). A systematic review by Marais LC et al., demonstrated that tuberculous arthritis of native joints frequently presents with nonspecific symptoms and imaging findings, resulting in substantial delays in diagnosis and treatment (7). The review further highlighted that chronic monoarthritis, pain, swelling, and progressive limitation of movement are the most common presentations. The patient of present case shared several of these characteristics; however, the unusual manifestation as a giant posterior knee swelling mimicking a Baker’s cyst makes the present case particularly uncommon (7).

Pinto I et al., reported a case of tuberculosis presenting as chronic monoarthritis in which extensive investigations were required before the diagnosis was established (8). Similar diagnostic difficulties were encountered in the patient of current case, who underwent repeated aspirations and conservative treatment before tuberculosis was considered. These observations reinforce the need to maintain a high index of suspicion for tuberculosis in patients with chronic, unexplained musculoskeletal lesions, especially in endemic regions (8). In a retrospective study evaluating patients with musculoskeletal tuberculosis, Ozdemir M et al., found that delayed diagnosis was associated with prolonged symptoms, increased tissue destruction, and poorer functional outcomes (9). Fortunately, despite a delay in diagnosis, our patient achieved an excellent postoperative outcome following complete surgical excision and institution of appropriate antitubercular therapy. At six-month follow-up, pain improved markedly from a VAS score of 7/10 to 1/10, knee range of motion improved to 0-120°, and no recurrence was observed.

Although osteoarticular tuberculosis is well described in adults, Herdea A et al., emphasised that delayed recognition remains a major challenge even in contemporary clinical practice and may adversely affect treatment outcomes (10). Their observations further support the importance of early diagnosis, microbiological confirmation, and prompt initiation of appropriate therapy. In the present case, GeneXpert and MGIT culture not only confirmed the diagnosis but also identified rifampicin resistance, allowing timely initiation of a WHO-recommended drug-resistant tuberculosis regimen. The identification of RR-TB adds further clinical significance to the present report. While most published cases of knee tuberculosis involve drug-sensitive disease, our patient required prolonged treatment with a WHO-recommended all-oral regimen because of confirmed rifampicin resistance (2). The combination of complete surgical excision, microbiological diagnosis, and appropriate drug-resistant tuberculosis therapy resulted in a favourable outcome without recurrence during follow-up.

Overall, the present case expands the spectrum of musculoskeletal tuberculosis by demonstrating an unusual presentation as a large tubercular cold abscess masquerading as a Baker’s cyst. Comparison with previously published reports highlights both the diagnostic challenges and the importance of maintaining clinical suspicion in atypical posterior knee swellings, particularly in tuberculosis-endemic regions.

Conclusion

Tubercular cold abscess around the knee can closely mimic a Baker’s cyst, particularly in elderly patients and in patient at tuberculosis-endemic regions, leading to potential diagnostic delay. Atypical or persistent posterior knee swellings that do not respond to conventional management should raise suspicion for infective aetiologies, including tuberculosis. Imaging findings may be misleading; hence, definitive diagnosis requires histopathological and microbiological confirmation. Early surgical excision combined with appropriate antitubercular therapy, especially in drug-resistant cases, ensures favourable outcomes and prevents recurrence and long-term complications. The present case shows the importance of a high index of clinical suspicion and comprehensive evaluation in managing unusual presentations of musculoskeletal tuberculosis.

References

1.
World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025.
2.
World Health Organization. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis: Module 4 - treatment and care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025.
3.
Lidder S, Lang KJ, Haroon M, Shahidi M, El-Guindi M. Tuberculosis of the knee. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2009;1(2):e24. Doi: 10.4081/or.2009.e24. [crossref]
4.
Mahajan NP, Pande KP, Dadhaniya RR, Talukder P, Bagimani PK. Surgical management of aggressive knee tuberculosis with open subtotal synovectomy: A case report and review of literature. J Orthop Case Rep. 2022;12(3):48-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Kotikalapudi S, Upadhyaya GK, Vemulapalli K. Latent reactivation of osteoarticular tuberculosis of the knee. Cureus. 2025;17(12):e98873. [crossref]
6.
Abid W, Ladeb MF, Chidambaranathan N, Peh WCG, Vanhoenacker FM. Imaging of musculoskeletal tuberculosis. Skeletal Radiol. 2024;53(10):2081-97. Doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04556-5. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Marais LC, Nieuwoudt L, Nansook A, Menon A, Benito N. Tuberculous arthritis of native joints - a systematic review and European Bone and Joint Infection Society workgroup report. J Bone Jt Infect. 2023;8(4):189-207. Doi: 10.5194/jbji-8-189- 2023. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Pinto I, Marques V, Dias L. Tuberculosis Presenting as Chronic Monoarthritis: A Case Study. Cureus. 2023 May 24;15(5):e39430. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.39430. [crossref]
9.
Ozdemir M, Ozdemir HG. Evaluation of patients admitted with musculoskeletal tuberculosis: Sixteen years’ experience from a single center in Turkey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):542. Doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04426-y. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Herdea A, Marie H, Negrila IA, Abdel Hamid Ahmed AD, Ulici A. Reevaluating pediatric osteomyelitis with osteoarticular tuberculosis: Addressing diagnostic delays and improving treatment outcomes. Children (Basel). 2024;11(11):1279. Doi: 10.3390/children11111279. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/89268.24348

Date of Submission: Mar 27, 2026
Date of Peer Review: May 05, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 28, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

Author declaration :
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 25, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 23, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 25, 2026 (1%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com