Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 426379

AbstractDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : QE01 - QE05 Full Version

From Placentation to Prediction: Modern Perspective on Emerging Biomarkers in Preeclampsia Prediction


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/87577.24358
R Saroash Zulfishaan, R Anusha, Preet Agarwal, Leena Chand

1. PhD Scholar, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, Panimalar Medical College and Research Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Leena Chand,
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai-600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: leena@sriramachandra.edu.in

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE), a multisystem hypertensive disorder complicating 3-8% of pregnancies worldwide, drives substantial maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, necessitating early predictive strategies to enable timely interventions. This narrative review synthesises evidence on galectin-7, galectin-3, galectin-13 (PP13), galectin-1, galectin-9, Carbonic Anhydrase IX (CAIX), and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1)/Placental Growth Factor (PlGF) ratio. Gal-7 and Gal-13 modulate trophoblast invasion, immune tolerance, and spiral artery remodelling at the maternal foetal interface; CAIX, regulates pH under conditions of placental ischaemia; sFlt-1 antagonises proangiogenic Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)/PIGF, precipitating endothelial dysfunction - a PE hallmark; and Gal 3 promotes inflammation and trophoblast migration while linking to fibrosis. Prospective cohorts demonstrated presymptomatic alterations highlighting diagnostic accuracy over traditional. By elucidating these biomarkers' mechanistic roles in defective placentation, angiogenic imbalance, and hypoxic stress, this analysis underscores their potential in multi-marker panels for precision risk stratification facilitating aspirin prophylaxis and surveillance to avert preterm delivery and organ injury.

Keywords

Angiogenic factors, Placental dysfunction, Reproductive Health (SDG 3)

The PE is characterised by an initial rise in blood pressure that usually occurs after 20 weeks of gestation during pregnancy, along with other symptoms such as proteinuria, neurological symptoms, liver dysfunction, signs of acute kidney injury, haemolysis or thrombocytopenia, and/or Foetal Growth Restriction (FGR) (1). It affects 3-8% of pregnancies. Foetal morbidity and mortality are brought on by iatrogenic preterm delivery, placental abruption and FGR, in addition to the increase in maternal morbidity. PE causes 76,000 maternal and 500,000 child fatalities worldwide each year with patients in low-income versus high-income nations experiencing noticeably greater rates of morbidity and mortality. Between 2014 and 2017, maternal hypertension disease during pregnancy was associated with 6.6% of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States (1). PE is a complex and multifactorial pregnancy disorder often described as a condition with diverse and overlapping pathogenic mechanisms. This is one of the well-recognised “great obstetrical syndromes” in which several pathological processes often overlapping converge on to a common pathway that ultimately leads to their clinical diagnosis (2). PE shares certain pathophysiological features with preterm labour, including inflammatory activation, decidual dysfunction, and abnormal uteroplacental remodelling membrane and decidual activation.

The PE is diagnosed as hypertension following the twentieth week and meeting one of the following criteria as mentioned in (Table/Fig 1). The PE and overlapping conditions occur in pregnant women with persistent hypertension. Pregnant women who exhibit persistent Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) of 160 mm Hg or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) of 110 mm Hg, or who meet any of the criteria in (Table/Fig 1), are considered to have severe PE (3).

The placenta is a vital organ in pregnancy that performs multiple essential functions, including supporting foetal growth and development through nutrient and gas exchange, waste removal, and endocrine activity (1).

LITERATURE SEARCH

This narrative review was conducted using a structured literature search strategy across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Articles published in English between 2010 and 2025 were reviewed. Keywords and Mesh terms included ‘preeclampsia”, “biomarkers”, “placental growth factor”, “sFlt-1”, “galectins”, “PAPP-A”, “NGAL”, “CAIX”, “placental hypoxia” and “prediction of preeclampsia”.

Inclusion criteria: Original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical studies evaluating serum biomarkers associated with PE prediction or pathophysiology were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Studies with insufficient methodological clarity, duplicate data, or unrelated outcomes were excluded from the study. The purpose of this review was to provide a comprehensive narrative synthesis of emerging biomarkers and their potential clinical relevance in predicting PE.

Angiogenic Biomarkers

One proangiogenic factor produced by the placenta is the PlGF which contributes to angiogenesis. It enhances the function of VEGF-A, which is necessary for maintaining vascular homeostasis. Maternal blood can be tested for PlGF as early as the eighth week of pregnancy; after the second trimester of pregnancy, the level gradually decreases until delivery. However, due to the elevated levels of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), PlGF remains persistently low in PE. An anti-angiogenic factor called sFlt-1 is elevated in the mother’s circulation during a typical pregnancy, but it is elevated even further in PE (4). By attaching to the receptor-binding domains of endothelial cell surface receptors, this protein inhibits the interaction of VEGF and PlGF, resulting in endothelial dysfunction. Because sFlt-1 binds to endothelial receptors, this will result in a decrease in the concentrations of free VEGF and PlGF in circulation. The amount of maternal sFlt-1 in circulation will rise about five weeks prior to the onset of symptoms. Hence, it was discovered that sFlt-1, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, and maternal PlGF performed well in screening, predicting development, diagnosing, and short-term monitoring of established PE. Ultimately, it is better to measure the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio rather than the PlGF level alone because we cannot rely on the level of PlGF in PE with severe features or early in the course of the disease, whereas the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio provides a more accurate and clinically useful assessment of angiogenic imbalance and disease severity (5).

Placental Growth Factor (PlGF): PlGF serves as a pivotal biomarker in PE prediction, with low maternal serum levels reliably identifying high-risk pregnancies across numerous studies (6). Meta-analysis demonstrates the strong predictive performance, yielding a pooled odds ratio of 9 (95% CI: 6-13) in 92,687 asymptomatic pregnant women participants, alongside high sensitivity 0.78 and specificity 0.88 for levels below 80-120 pg/mL, particularly after 14 weeks of gestation and for early-onset cases (OR: 18) (6). Combining PlGF with sFlt-1 enhances accuracy, as evidenced by a meta-analysis of 15 studies showing 80% sensitivity and 92% specificity for the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (>38), outperforming traditional markers and predicting onset within 7-28 days in symptomatic women (7). First-trimester screening further supports its integration into routine protocols, reducing diagnostic delays and severe maternal events when used adjunctively, though randomised trials are warranted. PlGF is a placenta-derived angiogenic factor whose circulating levels are significantly reduced in women who subsequently develop PE, often weeks before the onset of clinical symptoms (8). Low maternal serum PlGF, particularly in the first and early second trimester, has been shown to improve the prediction of both early and late onset PE when incorporated into multi-marker models. These findings underscore PlGF’s value in personalised antenatal surveillance for PE- prone pregnancies (9). Ng KW et al., (2024) reviewed biomarkers and point of care screening for PE management, highlighting sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >99% negative predictive value to rule out imminent disease, rapid POC assays (<15 min), and multi-marker panels with clinical factors achieving >90% preterm detection (10). The imbalance between antiangiogenic factors like sFlt-1 and proangiogenic factors such as PlGF and VEGF correlates with PE onset and severity.

Galectins

Galectins are a family of soluble glycan-binding proteins that play a key role in pregnancy, particularly in healthy placental development (11). Currently, 15 galectins have been identified and are being studied to determine how they may contribute to various pathogenic pathways. At the foetal-maternal interface, the galectin family members Galectin-1 (Gal-1), Galectin-3 (Gal-3), and Galectin-9 (Gal-9) are highly expressed (12). More precisely, several investigations and published studies have shown that dysregulated expression of Gal-3 and Gal-7 is associated with impaired placental vascularisation and perfusion, placental insufficiency, and has been implicated in the development of PE (13).

Gal 3: For successful implantation and placental development, trophoblast tissue invasion and migration are critical processes in which galectin-3 is involved. Galectin-3 is essential for controlling the behaviour of trophoblast cells, as evidenced by a recent study 2
(14). Galectin-3 was discovered to improve trophoblast cells’ migratory and invasive properties by modifying several signalling pathways and cytoskeletal dynamics. These processes are severely hampered by the lack of galectin-3 or its downregulation, which results in insufficient placentation (15). Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is present in many organs, such as immune cells, endothelium, and epithelial cells, as well as sensory neurons. Moreover, galectin-3 expression is downregulated throughout life. Nearly all immunocompetent cells, such as mast cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, monocytes, and macrophages, express galectin-3, which is essential for a number of immune functions. Galectin-3’s proinflammatory characteristics have been shown in several investigations. These qualities include its ability to attract neutrophils and macrophages, facilitate phagocytosis, and improve granulocyte adherence to endothelium (14). Comprehending the intricate processes that explain PE is essential for creating efficient diagnostic tools and therapies aimed at averting and controlling this illness. Consequently, to look into and shed light on any potential links between galectin-3 and pregnancy-related illnesses, such as PE and gestational hypertension.

Gal 7: Galectin-7 has been implicated in several processes essential for placentation, including regulation of cell adhesion, trophoblast migration, and immune modulation. Experimental studies have shown that LGALS7- deficient mice remain viable and fertile, suggesting possible compensatory biological mechanisms galectin-7 may function through both extracellular paracrine signalling and intracellular interactions involving proteins such as Ras and Bcl-2 to influence gene transcription and cellular responses (16). Serum levels of Galectin-7 are abnormally increased in first-trimester patients who go on to develop PE (16). Immune cells of the first-trimester placental villi and decidua, as well as STB and endothelial cells of the term placenta have all been demonstrated to have galectin-7. Decidua and endothelial cells of the term placenta express galectin-7 in addition to trophoblast. Galectin-7 represents novel, prospective serum biomarkers for PE (16). Jovanovic´ Krivokuc´a M et al., (2021) reported that galectin-7 plays an important role in trophoblast migration, apoptosis, and immune regulation during placental development. Dysregulated galectin-7 expression has been associated with abnormal placentation and PE, suggesting its potential utility as an early biomarker of placental dysfunction and adverse pregnancy outcomes (17). Menkhorst E et al., 2014 showed that, in contrast to pregnancies that were healthy, women who got PE had higher blood concentrations of galectin-7 in the 10-12th and 17-20th weeks of gestation (18). Despite the fact that a bigger sample size is required to establish galectin-7 as a predictive PE biomarker, it would be significant to combine serum levels of Galectin-7 with other proteins changed in PE, as there are currently no predictive biomarker(s) available for this pregnancy-related disease. The placenta would express galectin-7, which would be found in serum. Galectin-7 was localised in syncytiotrophoblasts, extravillous trophoblasts, and glandular epithelium during the first trimester, while term placentas demonstrated expression primarily in syncytiotrophoblasts and endothelial cell. Notably, endothelial staining was absent in placentas from pregnancies complicated by PE (18). When compared to women in healthy pregnancies, the blood concentration of galectin-7 was considerably higher in women (who later had PE) (18).

Gal 13: Placental Protein-13 (PP13), also known as galectin-13, is a placental galectin involved in trophoblast implantation, spiral artery remodelling, and regulation of inflammatory processes at the maternal-foetal interface. In pregnancies subsequently afflicted by ischaemic placental disease, its levels are lower during the first PE trimester and gradually increase during the second and third trimesters (19). PP-13, a protein linked to cell differentiation and inflammatory processes in the placenta, seems to be an effective biomarker for PE screening. Maternal blood tests performed between nine and 12 weeks of gestation revealed substantially lower serum levels of PP13 in women who had PE more than 15 to 25 weeks later in this prospective nested case-control research (20). When compared to normal pregnancies, the PP13 serum levels were significantly lower in women whose pregnancies were complicated by IUGR and preterm birth; nevertheless, these levels were still much greater than in the women who ultimately developed PE (20). On the reproductive system, especially on a set of six galectins that first became apparent in anthropoid apes along with the development of lengthy gestations and very invasive placentation. Among these six, PP 13 (also known as Gal 13) interacts with glycolipids and glycoproteins to facilitate a fruitful pregnancy (21).

Gal 1: The molecular pathogenesis is increasingly defined by the dysregulation of the galectin family, specifically the contrasting roles of Gal 1 and Gal 9 in mediating placental health. Gal 1, a 14.5 kDa homodimer protein, has been proposed as a primary angiogenic marker at the maternal-foetal interface (22). Galectin-1 is a glycan-binding protein highly expressed at the maternal-foetal interface that supports placental development and vascular remodelling by promoting endothelial cell activation and angiogenesis (23). Mechanistically, Gal 1 binds to the glycan structure of Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), which serves as a combination co-receptor that stabilises the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGFR2) endothelial cells (22). This interaction mimics the protein angiogenic signalling of VEGF, promoting robust trophoblast invasion and the expansion of the placental vascular network. Furthermore, Gal 1 is essential for establishing maternal-foetal immune tolerance by inducing the apoptosis of alloreactive maternal T cells and promoting an angiogenesis-protective T regulatory (Treg) cell environment (24).

Gal 9: Gal 9 contributes as a promising inflammatory switch that contributes to the vascular failure characteristics of the disease. While historically recognised for its role in the Tim-3 immune checkpoint pathway, recent high impact evidence has identified more deleterious mechanisms; and trophoblast derived Gal 9 binds to the CD44 receptor on decidual macrophages (25). Li ZH et al., (2019), showed that Galectin-9 reduced blood pressure, proteinuria and placental injury in an LPS-induced preeclampsia-like rat model. It promoted decidual macrophage polarisation the proinflammatory M1 phenotype toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Galectin-9 also improved trophoblast invasion and spiral artery remodeling, suggesting a protective role in placental development (26). Complementing these findings, Miko E et al., (2013) found that Galectin 9/TIM 3 signalling axis appears to play a pivotal role in maintaining immune tolerance during pregnancy, and dysregulated expression of galectin 9 and TIM 3 has been associated with heightened systemic inflammation, including Th1 lymphocyte activation, in PE (27). One of the main causes of placental insufficiency is placental hypoxia. The placental vascular network, which is essential for facilitating gas and nutrition exchange between the mother and foetus, is established during placentation when the trophoblast cells develop and enter the maternal tissues. Any interference with this mechanism may result in insufficient oxygen delivery to the placenta, which in turn may cause placental insufficiency and associated problems with pregnancy (28). Therefore, in order to comprehend a portion of the pathophysiology of placental insufficiency, evaluating placental oxygenation or hypoxia is crucial (29).

LIPOCALIN-2/NGAL: Lipocalin-2 (LCN2), also known as Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) is a 25 kDa glycoprotein released by neutrophils and renal tubular epithelial cells and is recognised as a biomarker of inflammation and renal injury. Sisti G et al., (2023) (30) evaluated the association between NGAL levels and PE and found that maternal serum/plasma NGAL concentrations were significantly higher in women with PE compared with normotensive pregnant controls. Elevated NGAL levels were observed before the clinical onset of the disease, suggesting its potential role as an early predictive biomarker. The authors concluded that NGAL reflects the inflammatory and endothelial dysfunction associated with PE and may aid in risk assessment, although further large-scale studies are required to establish its clinical utility and standardised cut-off values (30).

Carbonic Anhydrase IX (CAIX): A zinc metalloenzyme, CAIX is a member of the α carbonic anhydrase family, which catalyses the reversible conversion of carbon dioxide into bicarbonate ions and protons. For almost all biological activities requiring an acid-base balance in subcellular compartments and across the plasma membrane, this straightforward reaction is necessary (31).

Ozgen G and Dincgez B (2025) investigated the predictive value of maternal serum CAIX levels for FGR in women with early-onset PE. The study found significantly higher CAIX concentrations in preeclamptic pregnancies complicated by FGR compared with those without FGR. The authors proposed that elevated CAIX reflects increased placental hypoxia and insufficiency, which contribute to impaired foetal growth. Their findings suggest that CAIX may be a promising biomarker for identifying severe placental dysfunction and predicting adverse foetal outcomes in early-onset PE (32). (Table/Fig 2) shows biomarkers performance based on galectins with angiogenic/hypoxic markers (7),(8),(14),(18),(20),(22),(26),(30),(32).

However, current evidence regarding CAIX remains limited by small cohort sizes and insufficient longitudinal validation studies. Further multicentre prospective studies are required to establish standardised cut-off values and determine its predictive accuracy in diverse populations before routine clinical implementation.

Discussion

The PE is a multifactorial hypertensive disorder characterised by abnormal placentation, endothelial dysfunction, angiogenic imbalance, inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune dysregulation. Increasing evidence suggests that placental dysfunction precedes the onset of maternal clinical manifestations, highlighting the importance of early predictive biomarkers for timely intervention and improved maternal-foetal outcomes (33),(34).

Among currently available biomarkers, the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio demonstrates the strongest clinical utility for the prediction and diagnosis of PE. Elevated circulating sFIt-1 antagonises VEGF and PlGF signalling, resulting in endothelial dysfunction and impaired angiogenesis. Meta-analyses have shown that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio provides high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early-onset and severe PE, making it useful for short-term prediction and clinical monitoring (6),(8). However, the predictive accuracy of isolated PlGF measurements may vary depending on gestational age, disease severity, and population characteristics supporting the use of combined biomarker strategies rather than reliance on a single marker (7).

Emerging evidence also supports the involvement of galectins in placental development and immune regulation. Galectin-1 appears to contribute to trophoblast invasion, angiogenesis, and maternal-foetal immune tolerance, whereas galectin-3 has been associated with inflammatory signalling and trophoblast migration (13),(14),(22). Similarly, altered maternal serum levels of galectin-7 and galectin-13 (PP13) have been reported in pregnancies that later develop PE, suggesting their possible role in early placental maladaptation (18),(19),(20). Nevertheless, findings related to galectins remain heterogeneous, and several studies are limited by small sample sizes, variable gestational sampling periods, and differences in laboratory methodologies. In addition, most evidence regarding galectin-7 and galectin-9 is derived from experimental or observational studies indicating that their predictive utility still requires validation through large prospective multicenter trials CAIX, a hypoxia-associated biomarker, has shown potential in identifying placental ischaemia and endothelial dysfunction in PE. Elevated maternal serum CAIX levels have been associated with early-onset PE and FGR, suggesting its possible role in predicting severe placental insufficiency. However, current evidence is limited and requires further large-scale validation studies (32). Likewise, PAPP-A and NGAL/Lipocalin-2 reflect abnormal placentation and renal injury, respectively, and may complement angiogenic biomarkers in multi-marker prediction models (29),(30). However, the predictive performance of these biomarkers varies across studies, and standardised cut-off values have not yet been universally established.

Conclusion

The PE remains a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity, highlighting the need for effective early prediction. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio currently has the strongest clinical value for predicting and monitoring the disease. Emerging biomarkers, including galectin-1, galectin-7, galectin-13 (PP13), PAPP-A, NGAL and CAIX, offer additional information on placental dysfunction, inflammation, immune imbalance, and hypoxia. Evidence suggests that combining multiple biomarkers with clinical and biophysical parameters improves early risk assessment. However, variability among studies and the absence of standardised cut-off values limit routine clinical application. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to validate these biomarkers for precision obstetric care.

References

1.
Overton E, Tobes D, Lee A. Preeclampsia diagnosis and management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2022;36(1):107-21 Doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.02.003. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Jung E, Romero R, Yeo L, Gomez-Lopez N, Chaemsaithong P, Jaovisidha A, et al. The etiology of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2):S844-S866 Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1356. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Ramos JGL, Sass N, Costa SHM. Preeclampsia. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017;39(9):496-512. Doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604471. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Alghifari RM, Alhusayni NI, Alyamani ZF, Sabban A, Almoghrabi Y, Bakheit KH. The role of biochemical markers in the prediction of preeclampsia. Int J Biochem Res Rev. 2023;32(8):39-47. Doi: 10.9734/ijbcrr/2023/v32i8833. [crossref]
5.
Stepan H, Galindo A, Hund M, Schlembach D, Sillman J, Surbek D, et al. Clinical utility of sFlt-1 and PlGF in screening, prediction, diagnosis and monitoring of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61(2):168-80. Doi: 10.1002/uog.26032. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Agrawal S, Shinar S, Cerdeira AS, Redman C, Vatish M. Predictive performance of PlGF (placental growth factor) for screening preeclampsia in asymptomatic women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2019;74(5):1124-35. Doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13360. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Agrawal S, Cerdeira AS, Redman C, Vatish M. Meta-analysis and systematic review to assess the role of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placental growth factor ratio in prediction of preeclampsia: The SaPPPhirE study. Hypertension. 2018;71(2):306-16. Doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10182. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Creswell L, O’Gorman N, Palmer KR, da Silva Costa F, Rolnik DL. Perspectives on the use of placental growth factor (PlGF) in the prediction and diagnosis of pre-eclampsia: Recent insights and future steps. Int J Womens Health. 2023;15:255-71. Doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S368454. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Mathur P, Maru L, Dave A. A prospective study of placental growth factor assay as a novel biomarker in predicting early-onset preeclampsia in high-risk patients. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(Suppl 1):98-103 Doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0793-7. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Ng KW, Chaturvedi N, Coté GL, Fisher SA, Mabbott S. Biomarkers and point of care screening approaches for the management of preeclampsia. Commun Med. 2024;4(1):208. Doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00642-4. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Oladipo AF, Jayade M. Review of labouratory testing and biomarker screening for preeclampsia. BioMed. 2024;4(2):122-35. Doi: 10.3390/biomed4020010. [crossref]
12.
Ali M, Ahmed M, Memon M, Chandio F, Shaikh Q, Parveen A, et al. Preeclampsia: A comprehensive review. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2024;2024:119922 Doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119922. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Potiris A, Fotiou A, Drakaki E, Potetsianaki A, Zikopoulos A, Moustakli E, et al. Bridging the gap between Galectin-3 expression and hypertensive pregnancy disorders: A narrative review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(16):4636 Doi: 10.3390/jcm13164636. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Pugliese G, Iacobini C, Ricci C, Fantauzzi CB, Menini S. Galectin-3 in diabetic patients. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52(10):1413-23. Doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0187. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Bojic´ -Trbojevic´ Ž, Jovanovic´ Krivokuc´ a M, Vilotic´ A, Kolundžic´ N, Stefanoska I, Zetterberg F, et al. Human trophoblast requires Galectin-3 for cell migration and invasion. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2136. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38374-w. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Menkhorst E, Zhou W, Santos LL, Delforce S, So T, Rainczuk K, et al. Galectin-7 impairs placentation and causes preeclampsia features in mice. Hypertension. 2020;76(4):1185-94. Doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000198. [crossref]
17.
a M, Vilotic´ A, Nacka-Aleksic´ M, Pirkovic´ A, C ´ ujic´ D, Legner J, et al. Galectins in early pregnancy and pregnancy-associated pathologies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;23(1):69 Doi: 10.3390/ijms23010069. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Menkhorst E, Koga K, Van Sinderen M, Dimitriadis E. Galectin-7 serum levels are altered prior to the onset of pre-eclampsia. Placenta. 2014;35(4):281-85. Doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.01.009. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Vasilache IA, Carauleanu A, Socolov D, Matasariu R, Pavaleanu I, Nemescu D. Predictive performance of first trimester serum galectin 13/PP 13 in preeclampsia screening: A systematic review and meta analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2022;23(6):1-2. Doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11297. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Chafetz I, Kuhnreich I, Sammar M, Tal Y, Gibor Y, Meiri H, et al. First-trimester placental protein 13 screening for preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(1):35-e1 Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.025. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Sammar M, Drobnjak T, Mandala M, Gizurarson S, Huppertz B, Meiri H. Galectin 13 (PP13) facilitates remodelling and structural stabilization of maternal vessels during pregnancy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3192. Doi: 10.3390/ijms20133192. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Freitag N, Tirado-González I, Barrientos G, Herse F, Thijssen VL, Weedon-Fekjær SM, et al. Interfering with Gal-1–mediated angiogenesis contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(28):11451- 56. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303707110. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Xie Y, Zhao F, Freitag N, Borowski S, Wang Y, Harms C, et al. Maternal-derived galectin-1 shapes the placenta niche through Sda terminal glycosylation: Implication for preeclampsia. PNAS nexus. 2023;2(8):pgad247 Doi: 10.1093/ pnasnexus/pgad247. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Ramhorst RE, Giribaldi L, Fraccaroli L, Toscano MA, Stupirski JC, Romero MD, et al. Galectin-1 confers immune privilege to human trophoblast: Implications in recurrent fetal loss. Glycobiology. 2012;22(10):1374-86 Doi: 10.1093/glycob/cws104. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Li Y, Sang Y, Chang Y, Xu C, Lin Y, Zhang Y et al. A Galectin-9-driven CD11chigh decidual macrophage subset suppresses uterine vascular remodeling in preeclampsia. Circulation. 2024;149(21):1670-78. Doi: 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064391. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Li ZH, Wang LL, Liu H, Muyayalo KP, Huang XB, Mor G, et al. Galectin-9 alleviates LPS-induced preeclampsia-like impairment in rats via switching decidual macrophage polarization to M2 subtype. Front Immunol. 2019;9:3142. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Miko E, Meggyes M, Bogar B, Schmitz N, Barakonyi A, Varnagy A, et al. Involvement of Galectin-9/TIM-3 pathway in the systemic inflammatory response in early-onset preeclampsia. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71811. Doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0071811. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Al Darwish FM, Meijerink L, Coolen BF, Strijkers GJ, Bekker M, Lely T, et al. From molecules to imaging: Assessment of placental hypoxia biomarkers in placental insufficiency syndromes. Cells. 2023;12(16):2080. Doi: 10.3390/cells12162080. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Mazer Zumaeta A, Wright A, Syngelaki A, Maritsa VA, Da Silva AB, Nicolaides KH. Screening for pre-eclampsia at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: Use of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, placental growth factor or both. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(3):400-07. Doi: 10.1002/uog.22093. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Sisti G, Rubin G, Zhou C, Orth T, Schiattarella A. Neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin as a predictor of pre-eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;163(1):63-74. Doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14777. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Pastorekova S, Gillies RJ. The role of carbonic anhydrase IX in cancer development: Links to hypoxia, acidosis, and beyond. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019;38(1):65-77. Doi: 10.1007/s10555-019-09799-0. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Ozgen G, Dincgez B. Could carbonic anhydrase IX predict fetal growth restriction in early onset preeclampsia? Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2025;71(11):e20250838. Doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20250838. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
MacDonald TM, Walker SP, Hannan NJ, Tong S, Kaitu’u-Lino TU. Clinical tools and biomarkers to predict preeclampsia. EBioMedicine. 2022;75. Doi: 10.1016/j. ebiom.2021.103780. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Anderson UD, Olsson MG, Kristensen KH, Åkerström B, Hansson SR. Biochemical markers to predict preeclampsia. Placenta. 2012;33:S42-S47. Doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.11.021 [crossref]. [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/87577.24358

Date of Submission: Jan 20, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Mar 13, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jun 15, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 31, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jun 11, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jun 13, 2026 (1%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com