Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 178100

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : OD24 - OD27 Full Version

Young-onset Ischaemic Stroke Secondary to Antiphospholipid Syndrome Associated with Mitral Valvular Lesion: A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/90725.24317
Sadhurnaa Venkatesan, Vignessh Raveekumaran

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Puducherry, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University, Puducherry, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Vignessh Raveekumaran,
Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Puducherry-607402, India.
E-mail: vignesshravee@gmail.com

Abstract

Young-onset ischaemic stroke warrants evaluation for uncommon aetiologies, particularly autoimmune and hypercoagulable disorders. Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is an important cause of ischaemic stroke in young adults and is frequently associated with recurrent pregnancy loss and cardiac valvular lesions. A 32-year-old hypertensive female presented with weakness of the left lower limb for three days. Neurological examination revealed monoparesis with exaggerated reflexes and bilateral extensor plantar responses. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain demonstrated multiple acute non haemorrhagic infarcts in the right frontoparietal region, along with evidence of previous infarction. Echocardiography revealed a highly mobile echogenic mass attached to the posterior mitral leaflet associated with mitral regurgitation, suggestive of a cardioembolic source. Laboratory investigations demonstrated prolonged activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), positive lupus anticoagulant, elevated anticardiolipin Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, and positive Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) titre. A history of recurrent pregnancy loss further supported the diagnosis of secondary APS with probable cardioembolic stroke. Young stroke associated with adverse obstetric history should raise suspicion for APS. Cardiac valvular lesions in APS may act as embolic sources and contribute to recurrent ischaemic events. Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management are essential to prevent recurrent thrombotic complications and improve long-term neurological outcomes.

Keywords

Cardioembolic stroke, Libman-Sacks endocarditis, Recurrent pregnancy loss

Case Report

A 32-year-old female, a known case of systemic hypertension, presented with weakness of the left lower limb for three days. The weakness was insidious in onset and non progressive. She had been apparently asymptomatic three days prior to presentation, following which she developed difficulty in walking and inability to hold her slippers properly while ambulating.

There was no history suggestive of raised intracranial pressure or cortical involvement, including headache, vomiting, seizures, loss of consciousness, sensory disturbances, slurring of speech, or visual disturbances. She denied bowel or bladder disturbances. Initial evaluation at a peripheral hospital included Computed Tomography (CT) of the brain, which demonstrated a chronic right frontal lobe infarct without evidence of acute intracranial haemorrhage. She was subsequently referred for further evaluation (Table/Fig 1).

Past History and Family History

The medical history of the patient was significant for pregnancy-induced hypertension during her previous pregnancies, approximately 4-5 years prior to the present admission. She had been treated with labetalol during pregnancy and became normotensive after delivery. At the time of the present admission, she was not on regular antihypertensive medication. Her obstetric history revealed a live preterm birth during the first pregnancy at seven months of gestation. The second and third pregnancies were complicated by pre-eclampsia at approximately six months of gestation, followed by pregnancy loss/abortion. There was no history of substance use, known autoimmune disorder, premature cerebrovascular disease in the family, or consanguineous marriage.

Clinical Examination

On examination, the patient was conscious, oriented, and haemodynamically stable. Her blood pressure was 150/90 mmHg, pulse rate was 88 beats/minute, respiratory rate was 21 cycles/minute, and oxygen saturation was 98% on room air.

Cardiovascular examination revealed a loud pulmonary component of the second heart sound along with systolic murmurs in the pulmonary and mitral areas. Respiratory system examination demonstrated normal vesicular breath sounds bilaterally without added sounds. Abdominal examination was unremarkable.

Neurological examination revealed a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15/15 (E4V5M6), intact higher mental functions, and preserved cranial nerve function. Motor examination demonstrated reduced muscle power (3/5) in the left lower limb with exaggerated knee reflexes and bilateral extensor plantar responses. Sensory examination was normal, and cerebellar signs were absent (Table/Fig 2). Gait assessment demonstrated circumduction gait.

Laboratory Investigations

Routine laboratory investigations were within normal limits except for a markedly prolonged aPTT of 73.3 seconds, prompting evaluation for an underlying coagulation abnormality (Table/Fig 3).

Neurological Event and MRI Findings

The MRI of the brain demonstrated multiple acute non haemorrhagic infarcts involving the right frontoparietal region and right cingulate gyrus with diffusion restriction. In addition, chronic infarcts with encephalomalacic changes in the frontal lobes were noted, indicating previous silent or inadequately recognised cerebrovascular events (Table/Fig 4).

Cardiac Event and Echocardiographic Findings

Cardiac evaluation added another important dimension to the case. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a highly mobile echogenic mass measuring approximately 10×13 mm attached to the posterior mitral leaflet, associated with mild mitral regurgitation. Subsequent Transoesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) confirmed a globular mobile lesion attached to the posterior mitral leaflet, with differential considerations including healed vegetation, thrombus, or myxomatous degeneration. Although infective endocarditis was initially considered and empirical intravenous ceftriaxone was started after obtaining blood cultures, inflammatory markers including CRP and procalcitonin were negative (within reference range), and repeated blood cultures failed to demonstrate evidence of active infection (Table/Fig 5).

Rheumatology Evaluation and Findings

Further autoimmune investigations showed positive lupus anticoagulants, elevated anticardiolipin IgG antibodies, and positive ANA titre (1:320), strongly suggesting systemic lupus erythematosus with secondary APS (Table/Fig 3). Taken together, the recurrent pregnancy morbidity, prolonged aPTT, recurrent Ischaemic infarcts, and valvular lesion pointed toward an autoimmune thrombotic aetiology rather than isolated infective pathology.

The patient was managed with dual antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation with heparin, statins, antihypertensive medications, and supportive care. Multidisciplinary consultation involving neurology, cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, and rheumatology teams was obtained for further evaluation and long-term management planning. Follow-up details were not available, as the patient was referred to a higher centre of the family’s choice for further evaluation, including cardiac MRI and rheumatology consultation. The need for continued anticoagulation, repeat echocardiographic assessment, autoimmune work-up confirmation, and regular neurology, cardiology, and rheumatology follow-up was explained to the patient and her attendants at the time of referral.

Discussion

Stroke in young adults requires consideration beyond traditional vascular risk factors when the clinical presentation suggests recurrent, embolic, autoimmune or hypercoagulable pathology. APS is an acquired autoimmune thrombophilic disorder characterised by arterial and/or venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (1). Ischaemic stroke is a common arterial manifestation of APS, especially in young women, and may be the first clinical presentation (2). In the present case, the young age at presentation, recurrent pregnancy loss, prolonged aPTT, lupus anticoagulant positivity, increased anticardiolipin IgG antibody, positive ANA titre and evidence of acute and chronic cerebral infarcts was strongly supportive of an autoimmune thrombotic mechanism rather than isolated hypertensive or atherosclerotic stroke.

The present case is clinically relevant as the patient had neurological as well as cardiac manifestations of APS. Brain MRI demonstrated acute non haemorrhagic infarcts in the right frontoparietal region and right cingulate gyrus and chronic encephalomalacia changes compatible with previous silent or under-recognised ischaemic events. Similar recurrent or multiple cerebral infarctions have been described in APS-associated stroke, in which thrombosis may be caused by endothelial dysfunction, platelet activation, complement-mediated injury and interference with natural anticoagulant pathways (2),(3). The history of adverse pregnancy outcome was also supportive of this diagnosis as recurrent foetal loss and pregnancy morbidity are the classic clinical manifestations of APS (1),(4). Pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia in previous pregnancies could have masked the underlying autoimmune thrombophilia propensity in the present patient and postponed the diagnosis of APS until the development of the cerebrovascular symptoms.

A remarkable finding in the present case was a mobile echogenic mass attached to the posterior mitral leaflet with mitral regurgitation. This raised the possibility of Libman-Sacks Endocarditis (LSE) a sterile non bacterial thrombotic endocarditis associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and APS (5),(6) in the setting of APS and positive autoimmune markers. LSE frequently involves the mitral and aortic valves and may manifest as valve thickening, regurgitation or sterile vegetations (6),(7). In the present case, initial consideration was given to infective endocarditis, due to the combination of ischaemic stroke and a mobile mitral valve lesion. However, the lack of fever, negative inflammatory markers, negative repeat blood cultures and positive autoimmune serology favored a non infective thrombotic valvular lesion.

Similar observations are found in the literature. Liang H et al., reported a 26-year-old female with primary APS who developed multiple cerebral infarctions and mitral valve vegetations with mitral regurgitation (8). The patient was similar to the current case in being young, having had APS-related cerebral ischaemia and mitral valve involvement. However, progression of mitral regurgitation on follow-up was reported by Liang H et al., necessitating mechanical mitral valve replacement, unlike the present patient (8). This comparison emphasises the importance of serial echocardiographic monitoring in APS-related valvular lesions, as initially moderate lesions may progress despite medical treatment.

Takeuchi K et al., reported a case of persistent primary APS with recurrent stroke from enlarged LSE who underwent mitral valve replacement (9). The case is similar to the present case in terms of recurrent ischaemic cerebral events and mitral valve vegetation as a probable source of emboli. However, the present patient was treated medically during index admission and referred for further evaluation while the patient reported by Takeuchi K et al. required surgical intervention on account of recurrent stroke and enlargement of valvular lesion (9). This difference highlights that treatment decisions in APS-related LSE depend on size of vegetations, mobility, recurrent embolic events, severity of regurgitation and response to anticoagulation.

Yazidi MA et al., described a case of ischaemic stroke with LSE in a patient with mitral vegetations and severe mitral regurgitation (10). The diagnosis was difficult, as in the present case, because infective endocarditis had to be excluded against sterile autoimmune valvular disease. However, their patient presented with fever and severe valvular dysfunction, while the present patient was afebrile and had negative inflammatory markers, which suggest a higher likelihood of non bacterial thrombotic endocarditis. This contrast supports the need to interpret echocardiographic findings in conjunction with clinical, microbiological, inflammatory and autoimmune parameters before arriving at the final diagnosis.

Gorantla A et al., also reported embolic phenomena in LSE associated with APS, supporting the fact that sterile valvular vegetations may be a source of emboli and may cause systemic or cerebral thromboembolic events (11). This mechanism is supported by the present case in which the patient had a mobile lesion of the posterior mitral leaflet and multiple cerebral infarcts in different stages. The presence of old and new infarcts is compatible with recurrent thrombotic activity due to APS, cardioembolism from the mitral valve lesion, or both mechanisms. Thus, in the present case, after exclusion of active infective endocarditis, the case can be regarded as probable APS-associated cardioembolic stroke with suspected LSE.

The TEE is important in the assessment of APS-related valvular disease, since it is more sensitive than transthoracic echocardiography in the detection of vegetations, leaflet thickening and intracardiac thrombi (6),(7). Here, a transthoracic echocardiogram initially demonstrated a mobile echogenic mass, which was further defined by TEE as a globular mobile mass attached to the posterior mitral leaflet. This supports the recommendation that young stroke patients with APS features and a suspected cardioembolic source should be subject to detailed cardiac imaging, preferably including TEE.

Management of APS-related stroke with valvular involvement remains challenging. In general, long-term anticoagulation is recommended for APS patients with arterial thrombosis, especially if there is recurrent thrombosis or valvular lesions (1),(4),(5). The patient in the present case was managed with antiplatelets, heparin anticoagulation, statin, antihypertensive therapy, empirical antibiotics initially and multidisciplinary evaluation including neurology, cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery and rheumatology. As reported by Roldan CA et al., combined anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic therapy may improve Libman-Sacks vegetations and associated cerebrovascular disease in selected patients (12). However, surgical management may be necessary in patients with severe valve dysfunction, large vegetations or recurrent embolic events despite adequate anticoagulation as described by Liang H et al., and Takeuchi K et al., (8),(9). The present case highlights the necessity of an individualised approach depending on neurological recurrences, vegetation features, severity of mitral regurgitation, APS activity and imaging follow-up.

The present case also teaches us another important lesson in respect to the diagnostic value of a prolonged aPTT. Although APS is a prothrombotic disorder, lupus anticoagulant can paradoxically prolong phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays such as aPTT (13). The markedly prolonged aPTT in the present patient prompted further investigations and contributed to the diagnosis. This finding should not be interpreted as a bleeding diathesis alone but rather should raise suspicion for APS in a young stroke patient with pregnancy morbidity.

This case is another addition to the literature regarding the coexistence of young-onset ischaemic stroke, previous silent cerebral infarction, negative obstetric history, positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies, and a mobile mitral valvular lesion. The clinical presentation in this patient was similar to the typical APS presentation in young females with pregnancy morbidity when compared to previously reported cases where some presented later in life or needed surgical valve replacement. Hence, the present case highlights the importance of early APS screening in young women with stroke, differential diagnosis between infective and non infective valvular vegetations, use of TEE to evaluate cardiac source and multidisciplinary follow-up to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events.

Conclusion

Recurrent pregnancy loss and unexplained prolongation of aPTT in the setting of young-onset ischaemic stroke should raise suspicion for APS and prompt appropriate evaluation. Mitral valvular lesions in APS, particularly suspected LSE, can serve as a cardioembolic source and contribute to recurrent infarction. Similar cases in the literature suggest that APS-associated LSE may be managed medically with anticoagulation and anti-inflammatory therapy or surgically with valve intervention if recurrent embolism or severe valvular dysfunction occurs. The present case supports early autoimmune work-up, detailed echocardiographic assessment, exclusion of infective endocarditis and multidisciplinary management in young stroke patients with suspected APS.

References

1.
Knight JS, Branch DW, Ortel TL. Antiphospholipid syndrome: Advances in diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management. BMJ. 2023;380:e069717. Doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069717. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Mittal P, Quattrocchi G, Tohidi-Esfahani I, Sayar Z, Chandratheva A, Cohen H. Antiphospholipid syndrome, antiphospholipid antibodies, and stroke. Int J Stroke. 2023;18(4):383-91. Doi: 10.1177/17474930221150349. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
El Hasbani G, Uthman I. Lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome, and stroke: An attempt to crossmatch. Lupus. 2023;32(5):593-602. Doi: 10.1177/09612033231165151. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Ambati A, Knight JS, Zuo Y. Antiphospholipid syndrome management: A 2023 update and practical algorithm-based approach. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2023;35(3):149-60. Doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000932. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Sammaritano LR. Antiphospholipid syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020;34(1):101463. Doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.101463. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Tonutti A, Scarfò I, Canna G, Selmi C, Santis M. Diagnostic work-up in patients with nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(18):5819. Doi: 10.3390/jcm12185819. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Wu BL, Hu Y, Luo XJ, Lei XL, Gan YQ, Zhu ZG. Multiple organ dysfunction after mitral valve replacement in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus complicated by Libman-Sacks endocarditis: A case report and literature review. J Int Med Res. 2023;51(9):3000605231198731. Doi: 10.1177/03000605231198731. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Liang H, Ma C, Chen X. Case report: Mitral valve replacement for Libman-Sacks endocarditis and cerebral embolism of primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:985111. Doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.985111. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Takeuchi K, Izumi T, Nanaura H, Yamada N, Hayata Y, Obayashi C, et al. Mitral valve replacement for enlarged libman-sacks endocarditis in a patient with persistent primary antiphospholipid syndrome and recurrent stroke: A case report. Am J Case Rep. 2023;24:e938930. Doi: 10.12659/AJCR.938930. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Yazidi MA, Merzouk FZ, Rabii H, Benyoussef H, Bensahi I, Habbal R. Ischemic stroke revealing libman-sacks endocarditis: A case report. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2023;35(4):335-38. Doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1360. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Gorantla A, Schaible M, Sivakumar SS, Kishore A, Andrew-Palmer W, Unal S. Embolic phenomena of Libman-sacks endocarditis and antiphospholipid syndrome. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e46957. [crossref]
12.
Roldan CA, Sibbitt WL Jr, Greene ER, Qualls CR, Jung RE. Libman-Sacks endocarditis and associated cerebrovascular disease: The role of medical therapy. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):0247052. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247052. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Grygiel-Górniak B, Mazurkiewicz L. Positive antiphospholipid antibodies: Observation or treatment? J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023;56(2):301-14. Doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02834-6. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/90725.24317

Date of Submission: May 21, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Jun 23, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 05, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 27, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 01, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 03, 2026 (2%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com