Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 654553

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : OD19 - OD23 Full Version

A Rare Association of Atrial Septal Defect with Retinitis Pigmentosa in an Adult: Coincidence or Syndromic Link


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/90650.24316
Sumedh Krishna, Vignessh Raveekumaran

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Puducherry, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Vignessh Raveekumaran,
Assistant Professor, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute,Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Puducherry-607402, India.
E-mail: vignesshravee@gmail.com

Abstract

Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) and Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) are individually well-recognised clinical entities, but their co-occurrence in an adult patient without a defined syndromic diagnosis is exceptionally uncommon. A 52-year-old female with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) who presented with acute gastroenteritis complicated by septic and hypovolemic shock. During evaluation, she was incidentally found to have an ostium secundum ASD measuring 1.07 cm with left-to-right shunt, dilated right-sided cardiac chambers, dilated main pulmonary artery and Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure (PASP) of 43 mmHg. Ophthalmological assessment revealed bilateral advanced RP, with Visual Acuity (VA) limited to light perception in both eyes and fundus findings of peripheral bone-spicule pigmentation, attenuated retinal vessels and optic disc pallor. The family history was strongly suggestive of inherited retinal disease, with multiple siblings affected by progressive visual loss and a background of consanguinity. During admission, the patient developed a transient episode of left upper limb weakness, clinically consistent with Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA); neuroimaging showed no acute infarct. Usher syndrome was excluded by audiometry (normal bilateral hearing) and that Bardet-Biedl syndrome and Refsum disease were excluded on separate clinical grounds. The present case is reported because the non syndromic co-existence of ASD and RP may represent a coincidental association or an unrecognised shared genetic/developmental pathway. The case emphasises the need for multidisciplinary evaluation, genetic counselling and consideration of whole-exome sequencing in adults with congenital cardiac anomalies and familial retinal dystrophy.

Keywords

Consanguinity, Genetic association studies, Genetic counselling, Heart septal defects

Case Report

A 52-year-old female, known case of T2DM {Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.3%} for a year on Glycomet SR 500 mg once daily, presented to the Emergency Department with a three-day history of vomiting (4-6 episodes per day, aggravated by food intake) and loose stools (4-6 watery, non bloody episodes per day), accompanied by a single episode of low-grade fever. She also reported two days of self-spinning giddiness without specific aggravating or relieving factors, decreased appetite and reduced urine output. There was no history of chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, limb weakness, or slurring of speech at presentation.


The patient had been diagnosed with T2DM one year prior to this admission. She also carried a history of uterine fibroids. Of particular relevance, she had experienced progressive loss of vision in both eyes over the preceding year, with VA at presentation limited to light perception bilaterally. No prior cardiac evaluation had been undertaken.

Family history was strongly positive for progressive visual loss. The patient reported that one elder sister, two younger sisters and one younger brother had similar progressive deterioration of vision. The parents had a consanguineous marriage, as the patient’s mother was married to her maternal uncle. No family history of Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) was reported. The pedigree pattern, with multiple affected siblings of both sexes born to consanguineous parents, was suggestive of a possible autosomal recessive inheritance pattern for the retinal disorder (Table/Fig 1).


Clinical Examination

On examination, the patient was conscious and oriented. General examination revealed pallor and severe dehydration; no icterus, cyanosis, clubbing, lymphadenopathy, or pedal oedema were present. Vital signs on admission showed a Blood Pressure (BP) of 140/80 mmHg, Pulse Rate (PR) of 78/minute, Respiratory Rate (RR) of 24/minute and SpO2 of 100% on room air; Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) was 114 mg/dL. Cardiovascular examination revealed normal heart sounds without any audible murmur. Respiratory and abdominal examinations were unremarkable. Neurological examination showed a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15/15 with normal tone and power (5/5 in all four limbs) and flexor plantar responses bilaterally. VA was limited to light perception in both eyes.


Laboratory Investigations

Serial laboratory findings across the admission are summarised in (Table/Fig 2). Initial investigations revealed leukocytosis with neutrophilia {White Blood Cell (WBC) 9800cells/mm3, neutrophils 85.5%}, normocytic anaemia (Hb 11.3 g/dL), significant dyselectrolytaemia (sodium 126 mEq/L, potassium 3.2 mEq/L), elevated hepatic transaminases (SGOT 105 U/L, SGPT 62 U/L) and a markedly elevated CRP (>300 mg/L). Serum creatinine was 1.18 mg/dL. Urinalysis demonstrated haematuria (blood 3+) with 6-8 pus cells/high-power field (hpf). Blood and urine cultures yielded no growth. Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis (Day 6) showed pH 7.44, pCO2 41 mmHg, pO2 32 mmHg and HCO3 27.8 mEq/L. Biochemical parameters improved progressively with treatment.

Echocardiographic Findings

Two-Dimensional Echocardiography (2D-ECHO) (Table/Fig 3) demonstrated ostium secundum ASD with a defect measuring 1.07 cm showing left-to-right shunt on colour Doppler interrogation. Additional findings included dilated right atrium, right ventricle and main pulmonary artery, with a PASP of 43 mmHg indicating mild-to-moderate pulmonary arterial hypertension. Left Ventricular Systolic Function (LVSF) was preserved {Ejection Fraction (EF) 55%}; diastolic dysfunction was also noted. The ECHO findings are summarised in (Table/Fig 4).

Neurological Event and MRI Brain Findings

During the hospital course, the patient experienced a single episode of left upper limb weakness that was resolved spontaneously within minutes, consistent with a TIA. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) brain with Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and Magnetic Resonance Venography (MRV) revealed age-related neuroparenchymal changes with dilated ventricles and prominent sulcal spaces, but no evidence of acute infarct, haemorrhage, or space-occupying lesion. MRA demonstrated a hypoplastic right vertebral artery; all other cerebral vessels were normal. MRV showed no venous thrombosis. Neuromedicine opinion was obtained and dual antiplatelet therapy (Aspirin 75 mg + Clopidogrel 75 mg) along with Atorvastatin 40 mg were initiated.

Ophthalmological Findings - Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP)

Fundus examination of both eyes (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6) revealed the classical triad of RP: peripheral bone-spicule pigmentary deposits distributed throughout the peripheral retina, attenuated retinal vasculature bilaterally and waxy pallor of the optic disc with early disc pallor more advanced on the left. Relative macular preservation was noted on the right eye; more advanced changes were evident on the left. VA was limited to light perception bilaterally. No superimposed diabetic retinopathy or papilloedema was identified.

Audiological and Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Evaluation

Otorhinolaryngological consultation was sought to systematically exclude Usher syndrome (the most common syndrome of RP with sensorineural hearing loss) and to evaluate the complaint of giddiness. Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA) was performed on the same day of ophthalmic assessment. The complete ENT findings are documented in (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8).

The audiological evaluation conclusively demonstrated bilateral hearing sensitivity within normal limits, with PTA thresholds of 15 dBHL (decibel hearing level) bilaterally, positive Rinne test bilaterally and no Weber positive test. This effectively excluded Usher syndrome as a unifying diagnosis.

Syndromic Evaluation

The complete clinical profile was systematically evaluated against established syndromic associations of RP with cardiac disease. The findings are summarised in (Table/Fig 9).

Hospital Course and Treatment

The patient received intravenous fluid resuscitation with boluses for septic and hypovolemic shock and inotropic support was initiated for persistent hypotension; this was subsequently tapered and discontinued as haemodynamic stability was restored. Antibiotics comprised Injection Meropenem 1 g intravenous thrice daily for six days and Capsule Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for five days. Antiemetic (Injection Ondansetron 4 mg), proton pump inhibitor (Injection Pantoprazole 40 mg), electrolyte correction, calcium supplementation (Tab Shelcal 500 mg) and nutritional support were provided. Following the TIA event, dual antiplatelet therapy (Tab Aspirin 75 mg + Tab Clopidogrel 75 mg) and Tab Atorvastatin 40 mg nightly were commenced on neurological advice.

At discharge, the patient was haemodynamically stable (BP 100/60 mmHg, PR 84/min, SpO2 98% on room air, GCS 15/15). Discharge medications included Tab Faropenam 200 mg twice daily for four days, continuation of dual antiplatelets and statin, Midodrine 1 mg (tapered), Pantoprazole 40 mg, calcium supplementation and Tab Metformin 250 mg once daily. The patient was advised to follow-up in the General Medicine Outpatient Department (OPD), Cardiology OPD for ASD management planning and Ophthalmology OPD for RP monitoring.

Discussion

The ASD is one of the common congenital cardiac lesions detected in adults and the ostium secundum type accounts for the majority of adult cases. Many patients remain asymptomatic for years and are diagnosed incidentally when complications such as right heart dilatation, pulmonary arterial hypertension, arrhythmia, or embolic events occur (1),(2). In the present case, the patient had no previous cardiac evaluation and no history suggestive of CHD. However, 2D-ECHO revealed an ostium secundum ASD measuring 1.07 cm with left-to-right shunt, dilated right atrium, dilated right ventricle, dilated main pulmonary artery, preserved LVSF and PASP of 43 mmHg. These findings suggest a haemodynamically significant interatrial communication with chronic right-sided volume overload and mild-to-moderate pulmonary arterial hypertension (1),(2),(3).

The RP is a genetically heterogeneous inherited retinal dystrophy characterised by progressive photoreceptor degeneration (4),(5). The classical fundus findings include peripheral bone-spicule pigmentation, arteriolar attenuation and waxy optic disc pallor (5). In this patient, ophthalmological evaluation showed bilateral advanced RP with VA limited to light perception in both eyes. Fundus examination demonstrated diffuse peripheral bone-spicule pigmentary deposits, attenuated retinal vessels and optic disc pallor, with more advanced changes in the left eye. Importantly, there was no evidence of superimposed diabetic retinopathy, papilloedema, or other retinal pathology despite the patient having T2DM. This helped establish RP as the primary cause of visual impairment.

The family history in the present case is clinically important. The patient reported progressive visual loss in one elder sister, two younger sisters and one younger brother. In addition, there was a history of consanguinity, as the patient’s mother was married to her maternal uncle. The involvement of multiple siblings of both sexes in a consanguineous family background strongly suggests a possible autosomal recessive inheritance pattern for the retinal disorder (6),(7). Although genetic testing was not performed during admission, this pedigree pattern supports the need for genetic counselling and whole-exome sequencing of the proband and, if feasible, affected family members.

When RP co-exists with systemic disease, recognised syndromic associations must be considered and excluded. Usher syndrome is characterised by RP with sensorineural hearing loss, with or without vestibular dysfunction (4),(8). In the present patient, PTA showed hearing thresholds of 15 dB HL bilaterally, with positive Rinne test on both sides and no Weber laterisation, effectively excluding clinically significant sensorineural hearing loss. Kearns-Sayre syndrome, a mitochondrial cytopathy was unlikely because there was no progressive external ophthalmoplegia or cardiac conduction defect (9). Bardet-Biedl syndrome was excluded because obesity, polydactyly, renal anomaly and hypogonadism were absent (10). Refsum disease was also unlikely because there was no cerebellar ataxia, peripheral neuropathy, or arrhythmia (6),(7). Therefore, the clinical profile did not fulfil criteria for any established multisystem syndrome linking RP and cardiac disease.

Similar and atypical associations of RP have been described in various literature. Lobo S et al., in a case series, reported unusual associations such as posterior pole revascularisation, central serous chorioretinopathy and proliferative diabetic retinopathy in patients with RP (11). These findings are atypical because central visual loss in RP is more commonly attributed to posterior subcapsular cataract, cystoid macular oedema, epiretinal membrane, or macular hole formation (11). Another case series presented by Shivani M et al., reported RP with ocular and systemic associations, further supporting the need for complete ocular and systemic screening in patients with inherited retinal dystrophy (12). These reports highlight that RP should not be viewed only as an isolated retinal disorder, especially when there are severe visual impairment, consanguinity, or additional systemic findings.

The present case differs from these previously described atypical associations. The present patient did not have diabetic retinopathy, cystoid macular oedema, cataract-related visual loss, keratoconus, glaucoma, hearing loss, polydactyly, obesity, renal abnormality, neuropathy, ataxia, or ophthalmoplegia. Instead, the additional major findings were an ostium secundum ASD with right-sided chamber dilatation and pulmonary arterial hypertension. This makes the present case clinically distinct, as the co-existence of RP with a congenital interatrial ASD, in the absence of a recognised syndrome, appears to be rare. The association may be coincidental; however, the strong consanguineous background and familial clustering of RP raise the possibility of an unidentified shared genetic or developmental pathway.

A possible biological link between congenital cardiac septation defects and retinal dystrophy may involve genes with pleiotropic developmental roles. Mutations affecting cardiac transcription factors such as NKX2-5, GATA4 and TBX5 are known to be associated with CHD, including septal defects (13). Inherited retinal dystrophies, including RP, are also genetically heterogeneous and may involve genes related to photoreceptor structure, ciliary function and retinal maintenance (5),(14). Although no single established syndrome was identified in the present case, the coexistence of familial RP and ASD supports the need for molecular evaluation. Whole-exome sequencing would help clarify whether this represents a coincidental association or a previously unrecognised genetic link.

The transient neurological event in the present patient is also clinically relevant. During admission, she developed a transient episode of left upper limb weakness that resolved spontaneously within minutes, consistent with a TIA. MRI of the brain did not show acute infarct or haemorrhage, while MRA showed a hypoplastic right vertebral artery. In patients with an interatrial communication, paradoxical embolism is a recognised mechanism for TIA events, particularly when transient right-to-left flow occurs during pressure changes (3),(15),(16). Although the ECHO in this case demonstrated a left-to-right shunt, the presence of an unrepaired ASD makes cardiology follow-up important for assessment of closure suitability and prevention of future complications.

From a management perspective, this case emphasises the importance of multidisciplinary evaluation. The cardiac lesion requires formal cardiology assessment for device closure or surgical repair, considering the defect size, right-sided chamber dilatation, pulmonary artery dilatation and PASP (1),(3). The retinal disease requires ophthalmology follow-up, low-vision rehabilitation, surveillance for treatable complications such as cataract and cystoid macular oedema and counselling regarding the progressive nature of the disease (5). Normal audiological findings helped exclude Usher syndrome, while neurological evaluation-guided treatment of the TIA event. Therefore, the novelty of the present case lies not merely in reporting two rare coexisting diagnoses but demonstrating the value of systematic multispecialty evaluation in an adult with CHD, familial retinal dystrophy, consanguinity and TIA.

Conclusion

The authors report a rare adult case of ostium secundum ASD co-existing with bilateral RP in a 52-year-old female with a consanguineous family history of progressive visual loss, T2DM and a complicating TIA, without meeting criteria for any established multisystem syndrome. Systematic multidisciplinary evaluation and comprehensive audiological testing (PTA 15 dBHL bilaterally) effectively excluded all known syndromic associations. The co-occurrence of ASD and RP in this non syndromic context may reflect shared but as-yet-uncharacterised genetic pathways governing both cardiac septation and retinal photoreceptor development. Whole-exome sequencing is recommended. Clinicians should maintain a low threshold for ophthalmological and audiological assessment in adults diagnosed with CHD, particularly when a positive family history of visual loss or consanguinity is identified.

Authors’ contribution: SK: Case identification, data collection, laboratory data compilation, literature review, manuscript preparation and drafting. VR: Clinical supervision, Echocardiography interpretation support, clinical inputs, conceptualisation, critical revision of the manuscript and final approval. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical statement: This case report was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the present case report and the accompanying clinical images. Patient identity has been de-identified in accordance with institutional policy. Ethical clearance for case report publication was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Hospital, Pondicherry (Reference: IEC/MGMCRI/CR/2025). No experimental procedures were performed; all investigations and treatments were carried out as part of routine clinical care.

Acknowledgement

The authors sincerely thank the patient and her family for their trust, cooperation and written informed consent for publication of this case. The authors gratefully acknowledge the specialist contributions of the Department of Cardiology (echocardiographic evaluation and management advice), Department of Ophthalmology (fundoscopic evaluation and RP diagnosis), Department of Otorhinolaryngology for the audiological evaluation and ENT opinion and the Department of Neurology and Neuromedicine (TIA evaluation and management). The assistance of the Medical Records Department and the dedicated nursing staff of General Medicine Unit 5, MGMCRI, is gratefully acknowledged.

References

1.
Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV, Budts W, Chessa M, Diller GP, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(6):563-645. Doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Geva T, Martins JD, Wald RM. Atrial septal defects. Lancet. 2014;383 (9932):1921-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, Bozkurt B, Broberg CS, Colman JM. AHA/ ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(12):e81-e192. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Bhatt LK, Prabhavalkar KS. Retinitis pigmentosa – An overview of the current scenario and a glimpse of the future. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(4):411-15.
5.
Hartong DT, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1795-809. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Kannabiran C, Parameswarappa D, Jalali S. Genetics of inherited retinal diseases in understudied populations. Front Genet. 2022;13:858556. Doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.858556. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Ferrari S, Iorio E, Barbaro V, Ponzin D, Sorrentino F, Parmeggiani F. Retinitis pigmentosa: Genes and disease mechanisms. Current Genomics. 2011;12:238- 49. Doi: 10.2174/138920211795860107. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Pennings RJE, Huygen PLM, Orten DJ, Wagenaar M, Aarem A, Kimberling WJ. Hearing impairment in two large pedigrees with Usher syndrome type IIA associated with novel mutations in the USH2A gene. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(2):165-72.
9.
Mittal S, Jeji PS, Gupta S, Garg A. A holistic approach to a rare case of Kearns–Sayre Syndrome. Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;40(6):288. Doi: 10.4103/ jmedsci.jmedsci_84_20. [crossref]
10.
Rustad CF, Bragadottir R, Tveten K, Nordgarden H, Miller JU, Åsten PM, et al. Clinical and genetic aspects of Bardet-Biedl syndrome in adults in Norway. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025;20(1):127. Doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03641-3. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Lobo S, Govindraj I, Rajendran A. Atypical associations of retinitis pigmentosa: A case series. Indian J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2023;3(3):739-42. [crossref]
12.
Shivani M, Anganeyulu K, Geetha A, Babu R, Sreedevi KVN. A case series of retinitis pigmentosa with ocular and systemic associations. In: Presented at: 2nd Mid Term Conference of All India Ophthalmological Society; 2023 Oct 13-14. Visakhapatnam, India.
13.
Schott JJ, Benson DW, Basson CT, Pease W, Silberbach GM, Moak JP. Congenital heart disease caused by mutations in the transcription factor NKX2-5. Science. 1998;281(5373):108-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Reiter JF, Leroux MR. Genes and molecular pathways underpinning ciliopathies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(9):533-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Mojadidi MK, Bogush N, Caceres JD, Msaouel P, Tobis JM. Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiogram for the detection of patent foramen ovale: A meta-analysis. Echocardiography. 2014;31(6):752-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Meissner I, Whisnant JP, Khandheria BK, Spittell PC, O’Fallon WM, Pascoe RD. Prevalence of potential risk factors for stroke assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography: The SPARC study. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74(9):862-69. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/90650.24316

Date of Submission: May 19, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Jun 19, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 13, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 04, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 09, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 11, 2026 (1%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com