Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 179936

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : MC01 - MC05 Full Version

Pattern of Thyroid Disorders: A Cross-sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Coastal Odisha, India


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/90352.24369
Ikhita Misra, Lalit Mohan Sika, Itishree Prusty, Ishani Rath

1. Assistant Professor, Department of ENT, SJMCH, Puri, Odisha, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, PRMMCH, Baripada, Odisha, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, SCBMCH, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Biochemistry, VIMSAR, Burla, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ikhita Misra,
Assistant Professor, Department of ENT, SJMCH, Puri-752004, Odisha, India.
E-mail: ikhimisra@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Thyroid disorders have been reported to be highly prevalent in India, particularly in coastal regions where iodine excess may contribute to structural and functional abnormalities. Data from Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) outpatient settings in eastern India remain limited.

Aim: To evaluate the demographic profile, clinical spectrum, and biochemical patterns of thyroid dysfunction among patients presenting to the Otorhinolaryngology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in coastal Odisha, India.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Sri Jagannatha Medical College and Hospital (SJMCH), Puri, Odisha, India. The study enrolled 213 consecutive patients with clinical or biochemical evidence of thyroid dysfunction over one year. Detailed history, examination, serum Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), free Triiodothyronine (T3), Tetraiodothyronine (T4) {Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA)}, Ultrasonography (USG), and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) (where indicated) were performed. Patients were classified as euthyroid, overt/subclinical hypo- or hyperthyroid using standard reference ranges. Statistical analysis used Python 3.12 (Python Software Foundation) with the SciPy (version 1.11).

Results: The cohort was 88.7% female (mean age 35.14±13.54 years). Euthyroid status predominated (n=139, 65.3%), followed by hypothyroidism (n=50, 23.5%) and hyperthyroidism (n=24, 11.3%). Goitre was present in 158 (74.2%) patients including diffuse goitre (n=44, 20.7%), colloid cyst (n=38, 17.8%), and solitary thyroid nodule (n=30, 14.1%). Hormone levels differed significantly across groups (p-value <0.0001). A significant difference in age group was observed across the three thyroid function groups (p-value=0.0415); no significant differences were found by gender (p-value= 0.630).

Conclusion: Euthyroid structural thyroid disorders constituted the majority of ENT referrals in coastal Odisha. Female predominance and high goitre rates highlight the need for integrated ENT-endocrine evaluation and region-specific screening strategies.

Keywords

Euthyroid, Goitre, Hypothyroidism

The thyroid gland serves as the central regulator of the body’s metabolic rate, growth, and development, influencing nearly every organ system from the cardiovascular to the central nervous system. Thyroid disorders can range from functional abnormalities like hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism to structural issues like goitres and nodules, representing a significant global health challenge (1),(2).

In India, these disorders have emerged as one of the most common endocrine problems, second only to diabetes mellitus, necessitating localised research to understand their evolving patterns (3),(4). Current estimates suggest that approximately 42 million people in India suffer from thyroid dysfunction (5). While iodine deficiency was historically the primary driver, the post-Universal Salt Iodisation (USI) era has seen a rise in autoimmune thyroiditis (such as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis) and subclinical disorders (6),(7). Geographical and environmental factors play a pivotal role in the manifestation of thyroid diseases. Despite the proximity to the sea and a diet naturally rich in seafood (high in iodine), coastal populations often exhibit a high prevalence of thyroid disorders. This is sometimes attributed to the excessive intake of iodine, which can trigger thyroid autoimmunity or thyroid nodules (8).

While national data provides a broad overview of thyroid dysfunction in India, it overlooks regional variations driven by distinct geographical and dietary factors. Coastal Odisha presents a unique ecological matrix; despite a diet naturally rich in marine iodine, the region exhibits a high volume of thyroid disorders. The interaction between this high baseline iodine intake and post- USI mandates remains poorly understood in this demographic, with a stark scarcity of prospective data mapping local autoimmune and structural patterns. This study addresses this literature gap, offering essential regional data to differentiate local aetiologies and optimise clinical management in a coastal tertiary care. Clarifying the local aetiology, whether autoimmune or iodine-related, may facilitate more precise therapeutic interventions and reduce the risks of over-treatment or under-diagnosis.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional, hospital-based study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Sri Jagannatha Medical College and Hospital (SJMCH), Puri, a tertiary care teaching hospital in coastal Odisha, India over one year (February 2025 - January 2026). Approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained prior to the commencement of the study (IEC ref no. 86/IEC SJMCH/15.02.25).

Inclusion criteria: All adult patients presenting with clinical signs/symptoms of thyroid dysfunction or abnormal thyroid profiles were enrolled after informed consent.

Exclusion criteria: Patients on prior thyroid medications, pregnant/lactating women, critically ill patients, and those with non-thyroid neck swellings were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size for this cross-sectional study was calculated using the standard single-proportion formula: n={Z2 p (1-p)}/d2 where, ‘n’ represents the required sample size, and ‘Z’ is the standard normal deviate set at 1.96 to achieve a 95% confidence interval. The anticipated regional prevalence of thyroid dysfunction (p) was conservatively estimated at 15% (p=0.15), based on multicentre epidemiological data in India indicating an overall hypothyroidism prevalence of 10.95% (with an additional 8.02% subclinical cases) and female prevalence of 15.86% (9),(10), with an allowable absolute precision (d) set at 5% (d=0.05). A formal power calculation was not performed, as the single-proportion formula does not incorporate Type II error; the anticipated precision (d=5%) provides adequate estimation accuracy. Substituting these values into the formula yielded a baseline requirement of approximately 196 patients. Accounting for a potential 10% attrition rate due to incomplete laboratory data or loss to follow-up, the final target sample size was rounded out. Ultimately, a final of 213 patients meeting all predefined inclusion criteria was enrolled and evaluated.

Study Procedure

A detailed history and physical examination of the thyroid gland were performed. Biochemical evaluation included serum TSH, fT3, and fT4 measured by CLIA. Patient thyroid status was categorised according to the established operational reference intervals of our institution: TSH 0.30-5.50 mIU/mL, fT3 3.0-7.0 pmol/l, fT4 10.0-22.0 pmol/l. Patients were classified as euthyroid, overt hypothyroidism (high TSH, low fT4/fT3), subclinical hypothyroidism (high TSH, normal fT4/fT3), overt hyperthyroidism (low TSH, high fT4/fT3), or subclinical hyperthyroidism (low TSH, normal fT4/fT3) (11).

The USG neck was utilised to classify structural lesions according to American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) system (2017) (12). FNAC was performed under USG guidance using a 23-gauge needle with 2-3 passes per targeted lesion. Cytological reporting followed Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (2017) (13).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Analyses were performed using Python 3.12 (Python Software Foundation) with the SciPy (version 1.11) and NumPy libraries. Data visualisation was carried out using Matplotlib (version 3.10.0). Prior to analysis, data were screened for missing values, outliers, and entry errors. Continuous variables, such as patient age, were summarised using descriptive statistics, including mean, Standard Deviation (SD), median, and range. The normality of continuous data distributions was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test; all the variables were non-normally distributed. Categorical variables, including gender, thyroid function status (euthyroid, overt hypothyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism, overt hyperthyroidism, and subclinical hyperthyroidism), and morphological types of thyroid swellings, were expressed as frequencies (n) and percentages (%). The Chi-square (χ²) test of independence was used to evaluate the association between gender (female vs male) and abnormal thyroid function status, with abnormal status defined as the presence of any hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. When expected cell frequencies were less than five, Fisher’s exact test was applied as an alternative. Although five functional categories were defined, the age distribution was compared across three clinically meaningful groups {euthyroid versus hypothyroid (overt + subclinical) versus hyperthyroid (overt + subclinical)} using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, as this grouping is standard and clinically relevant while preserving statistical power. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 213 patients were included in the final analysis. The baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics are presented in (Table/Fig 1). The study population was predominantly female (n=189, 88.7%) with a mean age of 35.14±13.54 years (median 35 years; Interquartile Range (IQR) 25-44 years). The largest proportion of patients was in the 31-40 year age group 64 (30.0%). Euthyroid status was the most common finding (n=139,65.3%). Hypothyroidism was present in 50 patients (23.5%; overt 14.6%, subclinical 8.9%), while hyperthyroidism was seen in 24 patients (11.3%; overt 6.6%, subclinical 4.7%). Goitre was clinically or radiologically evident in 158 (74.2%) patients. The most frequent primary diagnoses were diffuse goitre 44 (20.7%), colloid cyst 38 (17.8%), solitary thyroid nodule 30 (14.1%), and multinodular goitre 20 (9.4%). No statistically significant differences were observed in the distribution of colloid cyst, diffuse goitre, or solitary thyroid nodule between females and males (all p-value >0.05).

The association between gender and the pattern of thyroid status is displayed in (Table/Fig 2). Among the female study participants, 125 (66.1%) were euthyroid, 44 (23.3%) were diagnosed with hypothyroidism, and 20 (10.6%) presented with hyperthyroidism. Similarly, among the male cohort, the majority were euthyroid (n=14, 58.3%), while 6 (25.0%) were hypothyroid and 4 (16.7%) were hyperthyroid. The analysis revealed that the distribution of euthyroid, hypothyroid, and hyperthyroid states did not differ significantly between male and female patients.

The distribution of age across the three thyroid function groups was evaluated and stratified by gender. (Table/Fig 3) shows that the overall median age across all the three cohorts of thyroid disorders remained consistently between third and fourth decades of life. Across all three functional status groups, male patients consistently exhibited a slightly higher median age than their female counterparts, though the male sub-populations were notably smaller. The analysis demonstrated significant difference in age distribution among the euthyroid, hypothyroid, and hyperthyroid groups (p-value= 0.0415).

Laboratory parameters stratified by thyroid function status group are detailed in (Table/Fig 4). Median TSH, T3, and T4 levels differed significantly across euthyroid, hypothyroid, and hyperthyroid groups (Kruskal-Wallis p-value <0.0001 for all three parameters), validating the biochemical classification criteria used in the study.

The findings indicate that structural thyroid abnormalities are highly prevalent in this coastal population cohort, whereas functional derangements follow expected biochemical patterns without significant demographic variation within this selected cohort.

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (ρ) among age, serum T3, T4, and TSH (Table/Fig 5) depicts strong positive correlation was observed between T3 and T4, while both T3 and T4 showed significant negative correlations with TSH, consistent with normal physiological feedback regulation. A weak negative correlation was noted between age and TSH (ρ=-0.16, p-value=0.019).

Discussion

This cross-sectional study from a tertiary care ENT department in coastal Odisha provides important region-specific data on the pattern of thyroid disorders. The overwhelming female predominance (88.7%) aligns with global and Indian epidemiological evidence, where women are disproportionately affected due to autoimmune susceptibility and oestrogen-mediated immune modulation (13),(14).

A notable finding was the high proportion of euthyroid patients (65.3%), which contrasts with reports from endocrine or general medicine clinics where functional disorders are more common (9). In the ENT setting, patients predominantly present with structural complaints such as goitre, nodules, cysts, or compressive symptoms, leading to referral even when euthyroid. This referral bias accounts for the discordance with community-based studies that report higher rates of overt and subclinical dysfunction (9),(15),(16),(17). The 74.2% prevalence of goitre further underscores the structural burden in this coastal population. Hypothyroidism (23.5%) outnumbered hyperthyroidism (11.3%), consistent with the post-USI epidemiological shift in India toward hypothyroidism and autoimmune thyroiditis. The absence of significant gender differences in functional status distribution (p-value= 0.630) may reflect the selected nature of the cohort; in broader populations, females and older adults typically show higher hypothyroidism rates (16),(17),(18).

The coastal location is noteworthy. Despite national salt iodisation, excessive dietary iodine from seafood and local salt sources has been implicated in increased nodular goitre and autoimmune thyroid disease in coastal India (8). The present study findings of high rates of diffuse goitre, colloid cysts, and multinodular goitre support this hypothesis and mirror observations from other coastal states such as Kerala and West Bengal (9),(19). Laboratory parameters showed the expected robust differences across groups (p-value <0.0001), confirming the validity of CLIA-based classification. The weak negative correlation between age and TSH observed in exploratory analysis (ρËœ-0.16) is consistent with known physiological trends but did not reach significance for group-wise age differences. Comparison with other Indian studies reveal both similarities and contrasts. Hospital-based studies from Uttarakhand and central India report thyroid dysfunction rates ranging from 30 to 40% among tested individuals (20),(21),(22). The present study observed abnormal TFT rate of 34.7% falls squarely within this regional range, reflecting a broadly similar burden of thyroid dysfunction across tertiary care settings in these regions. Community- and hospital-based studies from Odisha have reported undetected or subclinical hypothyroidism prevalence around 16 to 17%, highlighting a significant burden of unrecognised thyroid dysfunction that may progress if untreated (23),(24).

Comparison of thyroid disorder patterns with selected hospital-based studies from different regions of India reveals both striking similarities and important regional contrasts (Table/Fig 6) (20),(25),(26),(27). Across almost all hospital-based series, a marked female predominance (typically 80-90%) was observed, consistent with the well-documented 5-8-fold higher susceptibility of women to autoimmune thyroid disease and the oestrogen-related modulation of thyroid autoimmunity. In ENT and surgical outpatient settings (present study, Western Odisha series, Eastern India ENT series, and many coastal South Indian hospital cohorts), euthyroid structural lesions predominate (often 65-90% euthyroid). This reflects referral bias: patients present primarily with goitre, nodules, cysts or compressive symptoms rather than pure functional complaints that dominate endocrine or general medicine clinics. The present coastal Odisha ENT cohort (65.3% euthyroid, 74.2% goitre) aligns closely with this ENT-specific pattern.

Goitre and structural lesion rates are substantially higher in coastal populations (present study 74.2%; Kerala and coastal South India series frequently 40-70% among those with neck swellings) compared with many inland or hilly series (e.g., Uttarakhand lab-based cohort where functional abnormalities dominate and goitre is not the primary focus) (20),(26). This supports the hypothesis that residual high dietary iodine exposure from seafood and local salt sources in coastal Odisha, Kerala and other coastal belts may promote nodular goitre, colloid cysts and multinodular disease even in the post-USI era. Functional abnormalities (especially subclinical hypothyroidism) appear more frequent in non-ENT, multispecialty or community-enriched samples (Uttarakhand 40.6% dysfunction; Kerala coastal community ~19.6%). Thus, present study observed abnormal TFT rate of 34.7% sits between pure ENT structural series (25) and broader epidemiological and clinic-based series (9),(10), reflecting the mixed structural-functional presentation typical of tertiary ENT practice in coastal eastern India.

These findings reinforce the need for region-specific routine thyroid function testing in all patients presenting with goitre or neck swellings to ENT clinics, regardless of apparent euthyroid status on history. Early identification of subclinical dysfunction enables timely intervention and may prevent progression to overt disease or complications during surgical management of goitres and nodules.

Limitation(s)

This study transparently addresses single-centre design. Further, lack of autoantibody and urinary iodine data, incomplete prospective TI-RADS/Bethesda granularity, and limited power for gender-stratified analyses, highlights the need for future research. Because the primary scope of the present study investigation was strictly focused on the biochemical and epidemiological patterns of thyroid functional status rather than nodule stratification, these radiological and cytological metrics were not systematically tracked. Consequently, while clinical outcomes like papillary carcinoma were recorded as baseline characteristics, the preceding structural assessment pathway could not be characterised, which limits the morphological depth of the reported thyroid pathologies.

Future research should incorporate autoantibody profiling and community sampling to better delineate the true prevalence and aetiology in coastal Odisha, India.

Conclusion

In this cross-sectional study from coastal Odisha, euthyroid structural thyroid disorders predominated, with a clear female preponderance and peak incidence in the fourth decade. Hypothyroidism was twice as common as hyperthyroidism, and goitre affected nearly three-quarters of patients. The lack of demographic variation in functional status and the high burden of nodular and diffuse goitre likely reflect regional dietary and environmental influences. These data support the integration of biochemical screening into routine ENT evaluation of neck swellings and advocate for region-specific public health strategies to address iodine-related thyroid pathology in coastal India.

Acknowledgement

The authors sincerely acknowledge the invaluable guidance and support of Dr. Bandana Rath, Dr. Lorika Sahu, and Dr. Ashish Dash in the successful completion of this article.

Generative AI declaration: The author/s declare that they have used Quillbot AI tool for paraphrasing and improving the fluency of the writing. The author/s confirm that they have reviewed the manuscript and take/s full responsibility of the contents in the article.

References

1.
Hossen MS, Islam MM, Das A, Ripon MAR, Tohidul Amin M, Basher MA RM. Thyroid dysfunction prevalence and risk factors in the southeastern part of Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. Heal Sci Reports. 2025;8(1):e70329. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Nagendra L, Mondal S. Thyroid disorders in the tropics. Endotext [Internet]. 2024; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK605491/.
3.
Kumar KVSH, Patnaik SK. Incidence of endocrine disorders in Indian adult male population. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017;21(6):809-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Rana NS, Vishvakarma NK, Ghasidas G. Diabetes: A comprehensive review of the Indian landscape in contrast with global trends. World J Diabetes. 2026;17(2):1-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Abirami RS, Subiksha E, Mubasheer KFM, Swetha M, Padmaja S. Knowledge and awareness regarding thyroid disorder among paramedical students. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2024;11(11):4280-84. [crossref]
6.
Vargas-uricoechea H, Castellanos-pinedo A, Meza-cabrera IA, Pinzón-fernández MV, Urrego-noguera K, Vargas-sierra H. Iodine intake from universal salt iodization programs and hashimoto’s thyroiditis: A systematic review. Diseases. 2025;13(6):1-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Atapattu N, Jayatissa R, Silva H De, Adlan MA, Obuobie EK, Premawardhana LD. Thyroid autoimmunity during universal salt iodisation — possible short-term modulation with longer-term stability. Nutrients. 2024;16(24):4299. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Smyth PPA. Iodine, seaweed, and the thyroid. Eur Thyroid J. 2021;10(2):101-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Unnikrishnan AG, Kalra S, Sahay RK, Bantwal G. Prevalence of hypothyroidism in adults : An epidemiological study in eight cities of India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17(4):647-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Velayutham K, Selvan SSA, Unnikrishnan AG. Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among young females in a South Indian population. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(5):781-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Thakur SK, Agrawal M, Ghimire N, Bedajit RK, Roy P. Pattern of thyroid disorders in ENT OPD of Nobel Medical College in Eastern Nepal. J Diabetes Endocrinol Assoc Nepal. 2019;3(1):26-31. [crossref]
12.
Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5):587-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology. J Am Soc Cytopathol [Internet]. 2017;6(6):217-22. Doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2017.09.002.[crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Calabrò A, Accardi G, Aiello A, Zarcone R, Candore G. Autoimmune diseases are more common in women: Insights into sex and gender differences in autoimmunity. Explor Immunol. 2026;6:1003241. [crossref]
15.
Desai MK, Brinton RD. Autoimmune disease in women: Endocrine transition and risk across the lifespan. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10(4):265. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Singh SK, Singh R, Singh SK, Pandey AK, Jaiswal S, Rai PK. Thyroid dysfunction in India: What is different. Int J Adv Med. 2024;11(3):286-90. [crossref]
17.
Garg R, Thakre A, Prakash P. Clinical profile and comorbidity patterns in subclinical thyroid disorders. J Health Sci Res. 2025;10(2):66-71. [crossref]
18.
Jessy AS, Sandhya G, Monisha S, Sundarakumar JS, Stezin A. Prevalence of hypothyroidism in older adults and its association with cognition: A cross-sectional study from a South Indian ageing urban cohort. Brain Commun [Internet]. 2024;6(6):01-10. Doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae391. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Menon VU, Chellan G, Sundaram KR, Murthy S, Kumar H. Iodine status and its correlations with age , blood pressure , and thyroid volume in South Indian women above 35 years of age ( Amrita Thyroid Survey ). Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2011;15(4):309-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Gairola K, Lahon K, Mingwal BS, Rawat P. Estimation of prevalence and patterns of thyroid dysfunction in a tertiary care centre in Uttarakhand, India: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2023;17(7):16-21. [crossref]
21.
Bansal C, Singh A, Pandey P. Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction and antithyroid antibodies in north India. Sudan J Med Sci. 2024;19(4):449-59. [crossref]
22.
Bose A, Sharma N, Hemvani N, Chitnis DS. A hospital based prevalence study on thyroid disorders in Malwa region of central India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci [Internet]. 2015;4(6):604-11. Available from: http://www.ijcmas.com.
23.
Jena S, Pattnaik M, Sahu NC, Naik M. Undetected hypothyroidism prevalence and associated risk factors: A hospital- based study in Odisha, India. Eur J Cardiovasc Med. 2023;13(4):1231-35.
24.
Hussain T, Barik B, Nayak A, Das S, Khadanga U, Yadav V, et al. Prevalence and predictors of thyroid dysfunction among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending a tertiary care hospital in an urban area of Bhubaneswar, Odisha. Thyroid Res Pract. 2019;16(1):26. [crossref]
25.
Swain RR, Sahoo KB, Mohapatra A. An overview of thyroid swelling in Western Odisha –A hospital based retrospective clinico-pathological study. J Cardiovasc Dis Res [Internet]. 2023;14(10):113-18.
26.
Abraham R, Srinivasa Murugan V, Pukazhvanthen P, Sen SK. Thyroid disorders in women of Puducherry. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2009;24(1):52-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Sengupta A, Pal R, Kar S, Zaman FA, Basu M, Pal S. Clinico-pathological correlates of incidentally revealed thyroid swelling in Bihar, India. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012;4(1):51-55[crossref]. [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/90352.24369

Date of Submission: May 07, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Jun 22, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Aug 10, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 05, 2026
• Manual Googling: Aug 06, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Aug 08, 2026 (1%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com