Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 180541

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : EC26 - EC31 Full Version

Clinicopathological Features of Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Renal Biopsies: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study from Tertiary Care Centre in Kerala, India


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/91069.24398
Geethu G Nair, P Umasankar, Hijaz Poyyeri Thuvvakkod, Bindu C Sivasankaran, MK Thanooja

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Nephrology, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 5. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Geethu G Nair,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode-673008, Kerala, India.
E-mail: drggnair573@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) is a clinicopathological syndrome characterised by endothelial injury, microvascular thrombosis, and organ dysfunction. Renal involvement is common and may result from diverse primary and secondary aetiologies. The aetiological spectrum and histopathological manifestations of renal TMA vary considerably among different populations and clinical settings. Renal biopsy not only confirms the diagnosis but also provides valuable information regarding the pattern and chronicity of vascular and glomerular injury, which may have prognostic significance. Studies evaluating the spectrum of biopsy-proven renal TMA are limited, particularly from the Indian population, making such analyses important for improving diagnostic accuracy and patient management.

Aim: To evaluate the clinicopathological features and aetiological spectrum of TMA in renal biopsies.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India and included all native and graft renal biopsies diagnosed with TMA between January 2020 and December 2024. Cases of Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis and biopsies lacking definitive histological features of TMA were excluded. Clinical parameters (age, sex, blood pressure, proteinuria, haematuria, renal function), laboratory parameters (haemoglobin, platelet count, serum creatinine, serum albumin, complement levels), and histopathological features were evaluated. Acute and chronic TMA lesions were assessed, and cases were categorised according to underlying aetiology. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed using descriptive statistics. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±standard deviation, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages.

Results: Among 2,302 renal biopsies examined during the study period, 55 (2.39%) showed histological evidence of TMA. Forty-seven cases involved native kidneys and eight involved renal allografts. The mean age at presentation was 41.6±13.3 years, and 32.7% of patients were female. Hypertension-associated TMA was the most common aetiology, accounting for 30 (54.55%) of cases, followed by transplant-associated TMA 8 (14.55%), IgA Nephropathy 7 (12.73%) autoimmune diseases 5 (9.09%), infection-related TMA 3 (5.45%), atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome 1 (1.82%) and snake bite 1 (1.82%). All infection-related cases were associated with Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Proteinuria (89%) and microscopic haematuria (61.8%) were common clinical findings. Histologically, vascular lesions predominated, with fibrointimal hyperplasia and arteriolar thrombi being the most frequent abnormalities. Chronic vascular changes were more common than acute thrombotic lesions. Only two (3.64%) patients had thrombocytopenia, including the single case of complement-mediated atypical Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome (aHUS).

Conclusion: Secondary causes predominate in renal TMA, with hypertension-associated TMA being the leading aetiology. Chronic vascular lesions are common and may reflect delayed presentation and sustained endothelial injury. Renal biopsy remains essential for diagnosis, aetiological classification, and identification of uncommon causes of TMA.

Keywords

Hypertension, Renal Biopsy, Thrombotic Microangiopathy

TMA is a pathological process, where endothelial damage, microvascular thrombi, and organ dysfunction are hallmarks with the kidneys as major organs affected (1). TMA is caused by various pathological processes such as HUS, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, infection, autoimmunity, malignant hypertension, and drugs (1),(2). The pathogenesis of TMA involves the dysregulation in complement system, coagulation abnormalities, and damage to vascular endothelium causing substantial morbidity and mortality (3),(4),(5). As TMA is a heterogeneous disease with high chances of irreversible kidney damage, prompt identification and intervention of TMA is crucial.

TMA can be classified into primary and secondary causes. aHUS in which there is dysregulation of the complement pathway due to mutations in genes that control the alternative pathway of complement system, is a primary form of TMA. Another primary cause is TTP, which results from severe deficiency of ADAMTS13, a von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease, leading to widespread platelet aggregation and thrombosis (4). Recognition of these genetic forms of TMA is necessary since there is a chance that they will recur in transplants. Secondary TMA is caused by underlying processes such as infection, autoimmune conditions, malignancy, and medications.

Infection-related TMA is frequently seen in instances of HUS caused by Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) (4). Autoimmune diseases, particularly Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), can lead to secondary TMA by inducing endothelial injury and hypercoagulability (2). Malignancy-associated TMA is often linked to disseminated intravascular coagulation or direct vascular invasion by tumour cells (2),(4). Drug-induced TMA is another significant secondary factor, with medications like Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI), certain chemotherapeutic drugs, and certain antiplatelet drugs being identified as culprits (2),(4). With the increasing number of kidney transplants, it is important to recognise post-transplant TMA, which is predominantly de novo and most commonly associated with antibody-mediated rejection and CNI toxicity, although ischaemia-reperfusion injury and infections are also recognised causes (6).

While numerous research studies have explored the clinical and histological characteristics of TMA on a worldwide scale, limited data exist on its epidemiology and outcomes in Kerala (1),(5),(7),(8),(9). The region has a high prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and a substantial renal transplant population, making it important to understand the local aetiological spectrum and pathological patterns of TMA. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the aetiological spectrum and histopathological patterns of TMA in native and transplant kidneys and to correlate the histopathological findings with the clinical characteristics of the affected patients.

Material and Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study included all primary and secondary cases of TMA diagnosed on renal biopsies received in the Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India between 1st January 2020 and 31st December 2024. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the study (IEC No: GMCKKD/RP 2025/IEC/104) and since it was retrospective, consent waiver was obtained from the committee.

Inclusion criteria: All renal biopsies demonstrating histopathological features consistent with TMA were identified from the departmental records. Universal sampling (total enumeration) was adopted and all eligible biopsy-proven TMA cases identified during the study period were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Cases of ANCA-associated vasculitis and biopsies with clinical suspicion of TMA but lacking definitive histopathological evidence were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Renal biopsy specimens were routinely processed for light microscopy and stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E), Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS), Jones Methenamine Silver (JMS), and Masson’s trichrome stains. Histopathological evaluation was performed using light microscopy (Leica LX 500). The biopsy specimens were systematically assessed for glomerular, vascular, tubular and interstitial alterations. Histopathological evaluation included assessment of glomerular lesions (glomerular thrombi, endothelial swelling, mesangiolysis, glomerular ischaemic collapse, duplication/double contours of the glomerular basement membrane), vascular lesions (arteriolar and arterial thrombi, endothelial swelling or denudation, mucoid intimal oedema, fibrinoid necrosis, fibrous intimal thickening with onion-skin lamination, recanalised thrombi, hyalinosis), and tubulointerstitial changes (acute tubular injury, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and interstitial inflammation). Immunofluorescence was performed on frozen sections using FITC-labelled antibodies against IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q, kappa, and lambda. Immunofluorescence staining intensity was interpreted semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3+ with Olympus BX43F fluorescent microscope.

Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, relevant laboratory investigations, and aetiological diagnosis were retrieved from patient’s medical records and pathology request forms. Laboratory variables included haemoglobin, platelet count, serum creatinine, serum albumin, urine protein and serum C3 levels. Acute TMA was defined by the presence of fibrin thrombi within glomerular capillaries or arterioles, endothelial swelling or denudation, mesangiolysis in glomeruli, intramural fibrin deposition, and mucoid intimal oedema. Chronic TMA was defined by duplication (double contours) of glomerular capillary walls, glomerular ischaemic collapse, fibrous or mucoid intimal thickening with onion-skin lamination of arteries, recanalised thrombi, and arteriolar hyalinosis (1),(3). Based on the underlying aetiology, cases were categorised as hypertension-associated, infection-related, transplant-associated, autoimmune-associated, aHUS, or other causes.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed descriptively. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables were summarised using mean±standard deviation or median with range, wherever appropriate.

Results

Over a period of five years, a total of 2,302 biopsies were examined, with 55 (2.39% of all biopsies) showing histological signs of TMA. Among these, 47 were from native kidneys and eight were from transplants. The mean±SD age of patients was 41.6±13.3 years with females making up 32.7 % of the participants. Various causes of TMA have been summarised in (Table/Fig 1). The leading cause of TMA was hypertension (30 cases, 54.55%). At the time of clinical diagnosis, there was one pregnant patient and one post-partum patient. The pregnant patient was categorised as hypertension-associated TMA due to gestational hypertension, whereas the postpartum patient was classified under infection-associated TMA because of COVID-19 infection rather than as pregnancy-associated TMA. Notably, all infection-associated TMA cases were related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. All eight (14.55%) transplant recipients were receiving CNIs at the time of TMA diagnosis and were classified as having transplant-associated TMA. Among the transplant biopsies, rejection was the primary cause of TMA in five cases (63%), followed by CNI-induced toxicity in two cases (25%). The remaining transplant recipient developed TMA in the setting of an infection, with no evidence of rejection or CNI toxicity on biopsy. However, the precise aetiology could not be established, as the patient died before further investigations could be completed. Among the patients, 7 (12.73%) had IgA Nephropathy, 5 (9.09%) had autoimmune conditions, with Lupus Nephritis affecting four patients and scleroderma affecting remaining one. Single (1.82%) case of aHUS identified which was an eight-year-old girl presented as Microangiopathic Haemolytic Anaemia (MAHA) and thrombocytopenia. Genetic analysis showed deletion of CFHR3/CFHR1 gene, which results in abnormal complement activation and TMA. One (1.82%) case was associated with bite of Hump nosed pit viper. Clinical and laboratory features and histopathological findings are summarised in (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3), respectively. Only 2 (3.64%) patients had thrombocytopenia, one with atypical HUS and other postpartum COVID-19 patient.

Histopathological examination revealed that TMA lesions frequently exhibited a combination of acute and chronic changes within the same biopsy. Acute changes were seen in 31/55 (56.36%) cases, while chronic changes were present in 44/55 (80.0%) cases, with considerable overlap between the two groups. As both acute and chronic lesions could coexist in the same biopsy, these categories were not mutually exclusive. Acute TMA changes were identified in the single case of hump-nosed pit viper envenomation, one of the three COVID-19-associated cases, all four cases of lupus nephritis, six of the eight renal allograft biopsies, and 19 of the 30 hypertension-associated cases. Chronic TMA changes were observed in the case of aHUS, all three COVID-19-associated cases, the case of scleroderma, three of the four lupus nephritis cases, all seven cases of IgA nephropathy, two of the eight renal allograft biopsies, and 27 of the 30 hypertension-associated cases. Overall, chronic TMA changes predominated in the study cohort, while acute lesions were frequently superimposed on chronic vascular injury, particularly in hypertension-associated TMA, lupus nephritis, and COVID-19-associated TMA. Representative histopathological features of acute and chronic TMA are illustrated in (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7).

Only one patient with aHUS fulfilled the criteria for systemic TMA, presenting with both MAHA and thrombocytopenia. Another patient, a postpartum woman with COVID-19 infection, also had thrombocytopenia; however, the absence of peripheral blood smear findings and other laboratory investigations precluded confirmation of systemic TMA. The remaining cases could not be reliably classified as isolated renal TMA or systemic TMA because other investigations required to assess systemic microangiopathic haemolysis were unavailable.

Discussion

The TMA represents a clinicopathological syndrome characterised by endothelial injury, microvascular thrombosis, and variable degrees of ischaemic damage affecting many organs. Renal involvement is common and often requiring kidney biopsy for diagnosis and assessment of disease severity. Recent studies have emphasised the heterogeneity of renal TMA and the importance of clinicopathological correlation in identifying underlying aetiologies and predicting outcomes (1),(2),(3),(4),(5). In this study, different causes of renal biopsy confirmed TMA, considering clinical, laboratory, and pathological correlations were studied. A comparative analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics of the present study and other major published studies is presented in (Table/Fig 8) (7),(8),(9). A total of 55 cases of biopsy-proven renal TMA were identified over a five-year period, constituting about 2.39% of all renal biopsies. This frequency was slightly higher than that reported by Yu XJ et al., (1.4%) and substantially higher than that observed in some Indian series (9),(10) reflecting differences in biopsy practices, and underlying disease prevalence. The mean age of presentation in the present cohort was 41.6 years, indicating that TMA predominantly affects young and middle-aged adults, consistent with previous studies (8),(9),(10).

A notable finding of the present study was the predominance of secondary causes of TMA in our region, emphasising the importance of identifying underlying aetiologies rather than considering TMA as a primary disorder alone. Hypertension-associated TMA constituted the largest subgroup, accounting for more than half of all cases. Similar observations have been reported by Yu XJ et al., and Manickam N et al., where malignant hypertension emerged as the leading cause of biopsy-proven renal TMA (7),(8). In contrast, Johny J et al., identified autoimmune conditions as the main cause, indicating variations in disease distribution based on location and institution (9). Unlike earlier studies that largely emphasised malignant hypertension, only eight of the 30 hypertensive patients in the present cohort fulfilled the criteria for accelerated hypertension, while the remaining patients had a prior diagnosis of hypertension and were on treatment. This observation might indicate a lack of awareness of previous instances of accelerated hypertension prior to diagnosis, as blood pressure might have been somewhat managed by the time of assessment. Another interpretation was that TMA could arise in specific hypertensive individuals even without typical accelerated or malignant hypertension, suggesting a more complex pathogenesis than previously recognised.

Histologically, these cases demonstrated prominent vascular changes, including fibrointimal hyperplasia, mucoid intimal oedema, arteriolar thrombosis, and ischaemic glomerular alterations similar to previous literature (8). Severe hypertension causes endothelial injury through mechanical stress, resulting in platelet activation and microvascular thrombosis (1). In the present cohort, vascular lesions were considerably more frequent than glomerular thrombi, supporting the concept that arterial and arteriolar injury represent the dominant pathological process in hypertension-related TMA. The high burden of hypertension in our population may reflect delayed diagnosis, suboptimal blood pressure control, and late presentation to tertiary care centre.

Nevertheless, emerging evidence suggests that hypertension-associated TMA might not always be solely a secondary disorder. Timmermans SAMEG et al., demonstrated that in some cases of severe hypertension with TMA confirmed by renal biopsy, patients may have underlying complement abnormalities, categorising them as part of complement-mediated TMA and leading to a worse renal outcome (10). Importantly, these patients may not exhibit the classical features of complement-mediated TMA, such as overt MAHA or thrombocytopenia. Therefore, identifying TMA through renal biopsy in hypertensive patients should trigger consideration of assessing the complement pathway, regardless of the blood-related symptoms, as early detection of a complement-mediated process could have significant implications for treatment, prognosis, and prevention.

Transplant-associated TMA was the second most common cause identified in the present study. Among the eight graft biopsies, five cases were associated with rejection and two were attributed to CNI toxicity. One additional patient developed TMA following infection without evidence of rejection or drug toxicity. Post-transplant TMA is increasingly recognised as a severe complication associated with poor graft outcomes (11),(12). The pathogenesis is multifactorial and includes ischaemia-reperfusion injury, antibody-mediated rejection, CNI toxicity, mTOR inhibitors, infections, complement activation, and recurrent complement-mediated disease (5),(11),(12). Recent evidence suggests that endothelial injury serves as the final common pathway irrespective of the initiating trigger (11). The predominance of rejection-associated TMA in the present study was consistent with observations reported by Harshan N et al., from Kerala, who similarly identified rejection as the most frequent cause of transplant-associated TMA (5). Early recognition of these lesions is critical because prompt treatment of rejection or modification of immunosuppressive therapy may prevent irreversible graft damage.

Seven patients in the present study demonstrated TMA in association with IgA nephropathy. Notably, all patients had concomitant hypertension. El Karoui K et al., reported that TMA lesions are more common in IgA nephropathy than previously recognised and are strongly associated with severe hypertension, advanced renal dysfunction, and poor renal prognosis (13). The coexistence of TMA and IgA nephropathy may reflect endothelial injury induced by uncontrolled hypertension, although complement activation and inflammatory mediators may also contribute (13). The predominance of vascular lesions observed in the present study patients supports the important role of hypertension in the pathogenesis of TMA in this setting.

Autoimmune disorders accounted for a minor proportion of cases in the present cohort, with lupus nephritis being the most common. Histologically, these biopsies demonstrated involvement of glomerular capillaries predominantly. Previous studies have reported a prevalence of renal TMA in lupus nephritis ranging from 0.5% to 24.3%, depending on patient selection and diagnostic criteria (1),(14). The pathogenesis of TMA in lupus nephritis is multifactorial and may involve immune complex-mediated endothelial injury, complement activation, antiphospholipid antibodies, severe hypertension, and thrombotic events (1),(14). Song D et al., demonstrated that the presence of TMA in lupus nephritis is associated with more severe renal disease and poorer outcomes (14). The present study results indicate the importance of a thorough assessment for TMA abnormalities in lupus nephritis biopsies, as their identification could impact both prognosis and treatment. One patient in the present series had scleroderma renal crisis. Renal biopsy showed chronic TMA with prominent vascular involvement, a finding characteristic of systemic sclerosis-associated vasculopathy. Similar observations have been reported by Tonsawan P et al., who described obliterative vascular lesions as the hallmark pathological feature of scleroderma renal crisis (15). It is suggested that immune complexes containing scleroderma-specific autoantibodies might be responsible for endothelial activation in these instances (1).

All infection-related cases in the present study were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection which constituted a distinct subgroup not reported in earlier pre-pandemic series. Histological examination predominantly revealed chronic glomerulopathy. The imbalance in complement and coagulation system, along with a widespread cytokine storm, leads to damage to endothelium in such patients (1). Akilesh S et al., demonstrated that TMA-like lesions can be a cause of acute kidney injury and proteinuria in COVID-19 patients (16). Although the number of cases in the present study was limited, these findings further support the association between COVID-19 and renal microvascular injury.

In the present study, only one case of primary TMA was identified. This child patient was diagnosed with atypical HUS caused by complement issues, identified through the presence of a CFHR3/CFHR1 deletion. Detecting such genetic irregularities is crucial because individuals with complement-related aHUS might respond well to specific treatment using eculizumab (1),(2). Noteworthy points from our research include that thrombocytopenia was observed in only two patients: one with atypical HUS and the other with TMA associated with postpartum COVID-19. The low prevalence of thrombocytopenia highlights the predominance of renal-limited TMA in the present cohort and may explain why many cases required kidney biopsy for diagnosis. Primary TMAs are typically diagnosed based on thrombocytopenia, MAHA, and specific lab results, often making renal biopsy unnecessary. Therefore, studies relying on biopsies may show secondary TMAs more prominently while downplaying the real frequency of primary TMA.

A single case of TMA associated with hump-nosed pit viper envenomation was identified in the present study. Snakebite-associated TMA is an increasingly recognised cause of acute kidney injury in tropical countries. A systematic review by Noutsos T et al., demonstrated that hump-nosed vipers (Hypnale species) were among the most frequently reported snake species associated with TMA worldwide (17). This particular case was unique in displaying necrosis of the glomerular tuft on kidney biopsy, likely indicating severe damage to the endothelial cells and small blood vessels caused by the venom’s toxin.

The prognosis of renal TMA varies according to the underlying aetiology and the severity of renal injury. Complement-mediated TMA and transplant-associated TMA generally have poorer renal outcomes, while infection- drug- and snakebite-associated TMA may show recovery following treatment of the precipitating cause. Although hypertension-associated TMA is often considered a secondary form, research indicates that some patients have complement irregularities and experience adverse renal outcomes (10). Furthermore, chronic histological changes such as vascular intimal fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis are linked to a poorer prognosis regardless of the cause (7). Therefore, accurate aetiological classification and assessment of chronic renal damage are essential for prognostication and management.

Limitation(s)

This study had several limitations. First, its retrospective design resulted in incomplete clinical and laboratory information in some cases limiting comprehensive clinicopathological correlation. Second, being a single-centre study, the findings may not be fully generalisable to other populations. Third, advanced complement studies and genetic evaluation were not available in all cases, preventing comprehensive aetiological classification. Finally clinical follow-up data were unavailable for all patients, limiting assessment of long-term renal outcomes.

Conclusion

Renal TMA is an uncommon but important cause of renal dysfunction with a diverse aetiological spectrum. Hypertension-associated TMA was the predominant form in the present cohort, followed by transplant-associated disease. Chronic vascular lesions were more frequent than acute thrombotic changes, suggesting delayed presentation and sustained endothelial injury in many patients. Renal biopsy remains indispensable for confirming the diagnosis, identifying the underlying aetiology, and assessing the extent of acute and chronic vascular injury, particularly in patients with atypical clinical presentations. Greater awareness of common and emerging causes of TMA may facilitate earlier diagnosis and improve renal outcomes.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the use of ChatGPT (OpenAI) for assistance with language editing, grammar correction, and improvement of manuscript readability. The authors reviewed, edited, and take full responsibility for the final content of the manuscript.

References

1.
Genest DS, Patriquin CJ, Licht C, John R, Reich HN. Renal thrombotic microangiopathy: A review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2023;81(5):591-605.[crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Kim YJ. A new pathological perspective on thrombotic microangiopathy. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2022;41(5):524-32.[crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Abou-Ismail MY, Kapoor S, Citla Sridhar D, Nayak L, Ahuja S. Thrombotic microangiopathies: An illustrated review. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6(3):e12708.[crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Kovala M, Seppälä M, Kaartinen K, Meri S, Honkanen E, Räisänen-Sokolowski A. Vascular occlusion in kidney biopsy is characteristic of clinically manifesting thrombotic microangiopathy. J Clin Med. 2022;11(11):3124.[crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Harshan N, Simon S, Kumar J, Abraham A, Paul R, Ganesh K. Thrombotic microangiopathies postrenal transplantation. Indian Journal of Transplantation. 2020;14(3):213-18. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijot.ijot_29_19.[crossref]
6.
Mubarak M, Raza A, Rashid R, Sapna F, Shakeel S. Thrombotic microangiopathy after kidney transplantation: Expanding etiologic and pathogenetic spectra. World J Transplant. 2024;14(1):90277.[crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Yu XJ, Yu F, Song D, Wang SX, Song Y, Liu G, et al. Clinical and renal biopsy findings predicting outcome in renal thrombotic microangiopathy: A large cohort study from a single institute in China. Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:680502.[crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Manickam N, Agrawal V, Prasad P, Jain M, Prasad N. Clinico-histological features of thrombotic microangiopathy in renal biopsies: A retrospective study. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2022;38(1):01-08.[crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Johny J, Alam R, Mani SSR, Jose N, Lalwani M, John EE, et al. Clinical profile and outcomes of thrombotic microangiopathy: A kidney biopsy registry cohort. Indian J Nephrol. 2026;36:209-15. Doi: 10.25259/IJN_272_2024.[crossref]
10.
Timmermans SAMEG, Abdul-Hamid MA, Vanderlocht J, Damoiseaux JGMC, Reutelingsperger CP, van Paassen P, et al. Patients with hypertension-associated thrombotic microangiopathy may present with complement abnormalities. Kidney Int. 2017;91(6):1420-25.[crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Young JA, Pallas CR, Knovich MA. Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: Theoretical considerations and a practical approach to an unrefined diagnosis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021;56(8):1805-17.[crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Ãvila A, Gavela E, Sancho A. Thrombotic microangiopathy after kidney transplantation: An underdiagnosed and potentially reversible entity. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:642864.[crossref] [PubMed]
13.
El Karoui K, Hill GS, Karras A, Jacquot C, Moulonguet L, Kourilsky O, et al. A clinicopathologic study of thrombotic microangiopathy in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(1):137-48.[crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Song D, Wu LH, Wang FM, Yang XW, Zhu D, Chen M, et al. The spectrum of renal thrombotic microangiopathy in lupus nephritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R12.[crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Tonsawan P, Talabthong K, Puapairoj A, Foocharoen C. Renal pathology and clinical associations in systemic sclerosis: A historical cohort study. Int J Gen Med. 2019;12:323-31.[crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Akilesh S, Nast CC, Yamashita M, Henriksen K, Charu V, Troxell ML, et al. Multicenter clinicopathologic correlation of kidney biopsies performed in COVID- 19 patients presenting with acute kidney injury or proteinuria. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;77(1):82-93.[crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Noutsos T, Currie BJ, Lek RA, Isbister GK. Snakebite-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: A systematic review of clinical features, outcomes, and evidence for interventions including plasmapheresis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(12):e0008936.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/91069.24398

Date of Submission: Jun 10, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Jul 09, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 28, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No (Waiver)
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 02, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 23, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 25, 2026 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com