Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 101262

AbstractConclusionDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2026 | Month : October | Volume : 20 | Issue : 10 | Page : UE01 - UE07 Full Version

Anaesthetic Management of Tracheoesophageal Fistula: A Narrative Review of Principles, Challenges and Evolving Strategies


Published: October 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/86179.24423
Repalli Leela Rajeswari, Sanjot Ninave, Bhagyesh Sapkale

1. Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Undergraduate Student, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Repalli Leela Rajeswari,
Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha-442107, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: leelarepalli@gmail.com

Abstract

Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF), which is usually associated with Oesophageal Atresia (EA), is known to be a common congenital anomaly requiring urgent surgical intervention in the neonatal period. Anaesthetic management of TEF repair is very challenging because of the pathological communication between the airway and gastrointestinal tract, immature neonatal physiology, as well as frequent association with congenital anomalies, especially cardiac defects. Key aspects include the embryological basis, anatomical classification and pathophysiological implications influencing protection ventilation and airway, along with risk stratification using established prognostic systems such as the Spitz classification. Preoperative evaluation which is focused upon stabilisation strategies for minimising aspiration as well as respiratory compromise, detailed assessment for associated anomalies and optimisation of metabolic and respiratory status. Intraoperative management emphasises strategies into airway control inclusive of distal endotracheal tube placement, fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided localisation of the fistula, lung-protective ventilation for reduction of gastric insufflation and barotrauma. Postoperative anaesthetic and critical care management including decisions regarding elective ventilation, analgesia, monitoring and the prevention of complications such as anastomotic leak and recurrent fistula are also reviewed. Advancements such as opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia, minimally invasive surgery techniques as well as protocol-based multidisciplinary care pathways have contributed further in improved perioperative outcomes. Despite such developments there are significant gaps also remains into high-quality evidence further guiding optimal ventilation strategies, extubation criteria, long-term outcomes. This narrative review article highlights current practices, recent advances, future directions into research for evidence-based anaesthetic management of TEF repair.

Keywords

Airway management, Bronchoscopy, Neonatal anaesthesia, Oesophageal atresia, Ventilation strategies

The TEF is known to be a congenital anomaly which is characterised by an abnormal connection between trachea and the oesophagus, frequently occurring in association with EA (1),(2). The failure of the embryonic foregut to separate properly into distinct tracheal-oesophageal tubes during early gestation highlight its development, resulting in significant clinical challenges including aspiration, respiratory distress, as well as feeding intolerance in the neonatal period (3). Approximately one in 2,500 to 4,500 live births are affected, thereby making TEF along with EA one of the most common congenital defects that require emergency type of surgical care in infancy (4).

The earliest documented description of EA which is usually accompanied by TEF, dates back to 1670 when William Durston first reported a “monstrous birth” in Plymouth along with Thomas Gibson later providing clearer clinical and necropsy insights into proximal EA with distal fistula in the late 17th century (5). TEF was explained throughout 19th century as clinicians in Europe, North America reported cases, which further helped setting stage for attempts at surgical correction toward the end of that century (6). However, it was not until early-mid of 20th century that significant surgical progress was made (6). By the period of 1930s-1940s, pioneering surgeons like Ladd, Leven and Cameron Haight, Michigan, further introduced surgical approaches for primary surgical repair as well as end-to-end anastomosis (7).

Clinically, infants having TEF usually present shortly after birth with excessive salivation, coughing, choking, or cyanosis with feedings due to the fistulous communication which further permits aspiration of oral contents into the airway (8). Early diagnosis and appropriate surgical correction remain very essential for minimising morbidity, preventing life-threatening complications including recurrent pneumonia, malnutrition (8). Although majority of TEFs are discovered in neonatal age, isolated variants such as H-type fistula without associated EA includes only few cases and it can be more challenging to diagnose without targeted imaging approach, endoscopic evaluation (9). Over subsequent decades development into thoracoscopic approaches further reflects evolution into treatment of TEF from being fatal condition to one having high rates of survival, ongoing improvements in outcomes (7). The present narrative review article aims to synthesise current evidence regarding anaesthetic management of TEF, highlighting key principles, clinical features, recent advances along with future research directions to optimise outcomes in patients.

Embryological Basis and Anatomical Classification of Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF)

During early stages of embryonic development, trachea and oesophagus originate from a common foregut tube (10). Around fourth to sixth week of gestation, longitudinal Tracheoesophageal folds form and fuse for creating a Tracheoesophageal septum, which separates the foregut into a ventral respiratory (laryngotracheal) tube and a dorsal oesophageal tube (10),(11). Disruption of this separation process because of genetic, molecular, or environmental factors further influence dorsal-ventral patterning and morphogenesis resulting in Tracheoesophageal defects, including TEF and EA (10),(11). Research studies of animal models have also highlighted roles for key signalling pathways (such as WNT, BMP and SHH) in normal morphogenesis of foregut (11),(12). Additionally, other molecular pathways including Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) signalling, Retinoic Acid (RA) signalling and Notch signalling, as well as transcription factors such as SRY-box transcription factor 2 (SOX2) and NK2 homeobox 1 (NKX2-1).1, have been implicated in regulating dorsal-ventral patterning and epithelial differentiation during tracheoesophageal development (11),(12). Perturbations in all of these mechanisms can cause persistent communication between trachea and oesophagus or incomplete oesophageal development (11),(12).

Clinically, congenital TEFs are categorised which was based upon anatomic relationship between oesophagus and trachea (13). The classification inclusive of five main types such as, Type A (isolated EA without TEF), Type B (EA with proximal TEF), Type C (EA with distal TEF which is known to be the most common form, that accounts usually for ~85% of cases), Type D (EA with both proximal and distal TEFs) and Type E (H-type) (a fistula without associated EA) (13). This classification helps in diagnosis-surgical planning, along with its Type C is known as the prototypical presentation of proximal blind oesophageal pouch as well as distal tracheoesophageal communication (13). Congenital TEFs further contrast with acquired TEFs, which also arise postnatally because of trauma, malignancy, chronic inflammation (13). Anatomical Classification of Congenital TEF is described in (Table/Fig 1). Anatomical Classification of congenital TEF is depicted through (Table/Fig 2).

Pathophysiological Considerations of Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF) Relevant to Anaesthesia

The TEF is defined as an abnormal communication between trachea and oesophagus resulting in disruption of normal anatomical separation between airway as well as gastrointestinal tract (3),(14). TEF can occur in both congenital, acquired forms (14). Congenital TEF usually occurs along with EA due to abnormal embryologic separation of foregut during early development whereas acquired type TEF can arise secondary to malignancy, trauma, prolonged endotracheal intubation, radiotherapy (13),(14). The presence of this 2pathological communication predisposes patients to aspiration of gastric or oral contents into airway thereby leading to complications such as aspiration pneumonia, recurrent respiratory infections and feeding difficulties (13).

From an anaesthetic perspective, presence of a TEF creates a pathological communication between airway as well as gastrointestinal tract, which further affects ventilation, airway protection (15). During spontaneous or assisted ventilation, usually along with positive pressure, gas preferentially escapes through fistula into the stomach, resulting in gastric insufflation (15). Progressive gastric distension causes elevation of diaphragm, reduces compliance of lung, worsens ventilation-perfusion mismatch and can also precipitate severe hypoventilation and hypoxaemia (15). Gastric overdistension further increases intragastric pressure, thereby elevating risk of regurgitation as well as pulmonary aspiration, is a major cause of perioperative morbidity in neonates with TEF (15). All of these mechanisms highlight anaesthetic principle of avoiding mask ventilation using positive pressure, as well as maintaining spontaneous respiration until definitive airway control is achieved (16),(17).

Positive pressure ventilation in TEF is complicated by having difficulty in achieving effective lung ventilation, usually in distal fistulas, where a significant portion of delivered tidal volume is lost to the gastrointestinal tract (16). High airway pressures not only worsen gastric insufflation but it can also cause preferential ventilation of one lung, pneumonitis, or barotrauma (16). Many neonates also have varying degrees of pulmonary hypoplasia, especially in long-gap EA or those having associated antenatal polyhydramnios and prematurity (16). Hypoplastic lungs exhibit reduced compliance, impaired exchange of gas, making them highly sensitive to even brief periods of hypoxia, hypercapnia during induction as well as intubation (16),(17).

These challenges are further increased due to neonatal physiological limitations, including reduced Functional Residual Capacity (FRC), high oxygen consumption, minimal oxygen reserve, which all together result into rapid desaturation during apnoea (18). Furthermore, up to half of infants having TEF also have related congenital anomalies, which is most commonly in spectrum Vertebral, Anorectal, Cardiac, Tracheoesophageal, Renal and Limb anomalies (VACTERL) (18). Of these, congenital heart disease is particularly relevant to anaesthesia, as it can significantly cause alteration of haemodynamic responses to hypoxia, anaesthetic agents, as well as positive pressure ventilation (18),(19). Consequently, pathophysiology of TEF further requires meticulous preoperative assessment, gentle airway management strategies, controlled ventilation techniques, close coordination between anaesthesia-surgical teams for reducing complications which are related to respiration and aspiration (18).

Preoperative Evaluation and Optimisation in Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF)

Preoperative anaesthetic assessment, optimisation for neonates having TEF is a very critical multidisciplinary process aimed at minimising aspiration, respiratory compromise and perioperative morbidity and mortality (20). Initial stabilisation strategies including maintaining neonate in a semi-upright (head-up) position to use gravity for reducing reflux, pooling of secretions, continuous suctioning of upper oesophageal pouch and oropharynx for prevention of regurgitation and strict avoidance of positive-pressure mask ventilation before securing the airway, as mask ventilation can insufflate the gastrointestinal tract through fistula as well as worsen ventilation by diaphragmatic elevation (20),(21). In addition, neonates are usually nursed in prone or lateral positions with a suction catheter placed in the blind proximal oesophageal pouch for allowing continuous drainage of secretions and further reduce risk of pulmonary aspiration (20),(22).

Intravenous fluids must be instituted promptly for correcting dehydration along with maintaining normoglycaemia and prophylactic antibiotics are considered if aspiration or pneumonia is suspected (23). Routine investigations in preoperative period that include plain chest radiographs, which usually demonstrate a coiled feeding tube in blind upper pouch which confirms diagnosis, as well as arterial blood gas analysis, serum electrolytes for assessment of respiratory function, metabolic status (24). Failure to advance an orogastric tube beyond approximately 8-13 cm from mouth can raise early suspicion of EA with TEF which is often used as an initial bedside diagnostic indicator in neonates (22),(24). Importantly, echocardiography is recommended for identification of congenital cardiac anomalies which present in substantial proportion of cases which significantly influence perioperative management and can also reveal vascular anomalies such as a right-sided aortic arch that alter the surgical approach (25). As cardiac anomalies highly influence anaesthetic risk as well as surgical planning so detailed echocardiographic assessment is considered an essential component of preoperative evaluation (24),(25). Antenatal diagnosis which is done through ultrasound can raise suspicion through findings such as polyhydramnios, a small or absent fetal stomach, thus prompting early neonatal planning as well as team coordination (25).

Risk stratification forms an essential part of preoperative assessment, which further helps to guide clinical decision-making and perioperative counselling (26). Spitz classification is used most widely which stratifies infants depending upon birth weight (>1500 g vs <1500 g) as well as presence of major congenital cardiac anomalies (26). Neonates without having any major cardiac disease, along with a birth weight ≥1500 g shows highest survival, whereas those with both low birth weight as well as significant cardiac disease have markedly poorer outcomes (26). External validation studies which have consistently shown about predictive value of Spitz classification for mortality and morbidity in EA/TEF populations (26),(27). Moreover, prematurity and low birth weight independently worsen anaesthetic risk because of immature respiratory physiology along with higher susceptibility to perioperative stress thus it makes the meticulous optimisation of respiratory status and thermal regulation imperative (26),(27). Preoperative management is also inclusive of optimisation of respiratory function, administration of humidified oxygen when required, maintenance of normothermia, correction of electrolyte imbalances and preparation of blood products if significant surgical blood loss is anticipated (22),(27). Early identification and management of sepsis, pneumonia prior to definitive repair are also important as pulmonary infections significantly increase perioperative risk in various patients (27). Risk stratification in neonates with TEF is depicted in (Table/Fig 3).

Intraoperative Anaesthetic Management and Airway Strategies

Intraoperative anaesthetic management for neonates who are undergoing repair of TEF usually centers upon secure airway control and effective ventilation while minimising ventilation through fistula for reduction of gastric distension and aspiration risks (28). General anaesthesia is usually administered for definitive repair procedure with careful planning of airway management strategies which are tailored to location, size of the fistula (28). After induction, careful positioning of tracheal tube distal to fistula is paramount; placing the endotracheal tube below fistula site further helps to ensure effective ventilation of lung as well as reduces air passage into gastrointestinal tract thus limiting gastric insufflation and diaphragmatic compromise (28),(29). A commonly described technique which involves advancing endotracheal tube deliberately into right main bronchus followed by gradual withdrawal until bilateral breath sounds are detected thereby positioning tube tip just above the carina but distal to the fistula (22),(29). Intraoperative bronchoscopy has been utilised further for properly localising fistula as well as guiding tracheal tube placement, given that most type C TEFs are located near carina and may not lend themselves to blind deep intubation without precise localisation (28). Both rigid and flexible bronchoscopy can also help evaluate associated airway anomalies such as laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, laryngeal cleft, subglottic stenosis, vocal cord paresis which can further influence airway management along with ventilation strategies (22).

Fogarty, balloon-tipped catheters can also be used in few selected cases for temporarily occluding larger fistulas when available and when guided by fibreoptic equipment, facilitating more stable type of ventilation (28),(30). In staged repair procedures, a Fogarty catheter can also be introduced retrogradely through a gastrostomy and advanced under bronchoscopic guidance for occlusion of distal fistula thereby preventing air leak into the gastrointestinal tract during ventilation (22),(28),(30). Controlled ventilation with carefully titrated low tidal volumes, minimal positive pressure is recommended to avoid forcing air through fistula into the stomach which can aggravate gastric distension, impair diaphragmatic movement, as well as precipitate aspiration (29). Peak inspiratory pressures must be kept as low as possible particularly during positive-pressure ventilation as excessive pressures preferentially direct airflow through fistula resulting in gastric distension as well as compromised lung ventilation (22),(29).

Maintaining adequate oxygenation, haemodynamic stability throughout surgical repair is another type of core perioperative objective (14). Neonates having TEF usually have compromised pulmonary mechanics because of recurrent aspiration, pre-existing pneumonia, respiratory distress thereby it makes vigilant intraoperative monitoring essential (31). Pulse oximetry, capnography, invasive blood pressure monitoring, as well as frequent arterial blood gases further assist into guiding ventilation, oxygen delivery while anaesthetic depth must be sufficient to blunt surgical stimulation without inducing excessive respiratory depression (31). Standard intraoperative monitoring must be inclusive of electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure measurement, pulse oximetry along with consideration of preductal and postductal oxygen saturation monitoring also where feasible, arterial line placement for continuous blood pressure monitoring and arterial blood gas analysis (31),(32). Strategies inclusive of assisted-controlled ventilation following spontaneous breathing until ligation of the fistula are described which allow smoother transition, avoid high positive pressures early in the procedure (31). Where facilities permit, maintaining spontaneous ventilation during induction as well as initial airway management can help further to reduce the risk of gastric distension before performing definitive airway control (32). Short periods of gentle bag-mask ventilation can occasionally be required during airway instrumentation however it should be performed cautiously due to the risk of gastric insufflation (32).

Finally, collaborative communication along with surgical team throughout intraoperative period enhances safety of patient, usually during critical moments such as fistula ligation and mobilisation (33). Surgeons, anaesthesiologists must coordinate timing for adjustments into strategy of ventilation, suctioning to clear secretions, as well as response to changes in thoracic dynamics during surgical manipulation (33). Ventilatory parameters can need frequent adjustment during lung retraction or mediastinal manipulation as well as brief coordinated pauses in ventilation may sometimes be required to facilitate surgical exposure (22),(33). The anaesthetic plan must resolve potential complications like inadvertent endotracheal tube displacement, sudden changes into airway pressures, desaturation events along with contingency measures that are ready to ensure rapid correction (32),(33).

Postoperative Anaesthetic and Critical Care Management

Postoperative anaesthetic, critical care management plays an important role into determination of outcomes following surgical repair TEF, as this period is associated having a high risk of respiratory, cardiovascular, surgical complications. The decision between early extubation versus elective postoperative ventilation must be individualised (34). As many neonates usually remain intubated for a period after surgery, planning for postoperative care in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) must ideally be done prior to operation for ensuring availability of appropriate monitoring and ventilatory support (34),(35). Many neonates further need elective postoperative mechanical ventilation, usually those with prematurity, low birth weight, significant preoperative pulmonary disease, associated major cardiac anomalies, intraoperative instability, or prolonged and technically difficult repairs (34),(35). Controlled ventilation thereby allows proper oxygenation which also reduces work of breathing and minimises tension on anastomosis through avoiding excessive spontaneous respiratory effort, crying, which can predispose to anastomotic disruption (35). However, prolonged endotracheal intubation can further expose anastomotic site to sustained pressure from the endotracheal tube; therefore, the duration of postoperative ventilation should be minimised whenever clinically feasible (22),(35). Lung-protective ventilation strategies having low tidal volumes, careful titration of positive end-expiratory pressure as well as avoidance of hyperinflation are recommended due to underlying pulmonary vulnerability from aspiration or pneumonia (36),(37). Adequate sedation, analgesia are very essential to ensure comfort, synchrony with the ventilator and haemodynamic stability, while avoiding excessive respiratory depression (36),(38).

Close monitoring in neonatal intensive care unit is mandatory for detecting early postoperative complications as well as for identifying risk factors for extubation failure and reintubation, which include prematurity, low birth weight, persistent pulmonary infection, tracheomalacia, cardiac disease and inadequate pain control (39). Reintubation can be required because of excessive airway secretions or tracheobronchomalacia; however, repeated airway instrumentation must be avoided whenever possible as hyperextension of neck during reintubation can place tension on the oesophageal anastomosis (22). Continuous pulse oximetry, capnography in ventilated patients, invasive blood pressure monitoring when it is indicated along with serial arterial blood gas analyses further helps guiding ventilatory-metabolic management (40). Additional postoperative laboratory monitoring inclusive of complete blood count with particular attention to haematocrit levels may assist in evaluating haemodynamic stability and oxygen-carrying capacity (22),(40).

Postoperative pain management which is commonly achieved through continuous opioid infusions, supplemented with paracetamol as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy for reducing opioid requirements (38). Regional techniques like thoracic epidural analgesia have been described in selected centres; however their usage remains controversial in neonates because of the technical challenges, concerns regarding haemodynamic as well as neurological safety, should be reserved for experienced hands (41),(42). Furthermore, epidural analgesia can be avoided in neonates having significant cardiac anomalies due to the potential reduction in systemic vascular resistance and alternative techniques such as wound infiltration with local anaesthetic may be considered (41),(42). Fluid, electrolyte balance must be meticulously managed for avoiding fluid overload which can further worsen pulmonary function while also maintaining adequate perfusion (43). Postoperative fluid management must be guided by haemodynamic parameters as well as laboratory tests including serum sodium, creatinine and urea levels (43). Thermal regulation is usually important in premature and low-birth-weight neonates, as hypothermia increases consumption of oxygen and metabolic stress (43).

Respiratory complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia, air leaks, ventilator-associated complications, as well as tracheomalacia-related airway collapse are known to be common and it necessitate prolonged respiratory support (44). Other potential postoperative complications inclusive of pneumothorax, tracheal leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury which may contribute into respiratory compromise thereby requires prompt recognition (22),(44). Early signs of anastomotic leak like unexplained desaturation, increased ventilatory requirements, sepsis can be identified promptly, while recurrent fistula formation must be suspected in cases of persistent-recurrent respiratory symptoms after initial recovery of patient (44). Feeding is usually not done until anastomotic integrity is confirmed, as well as total parenteral nutrition can be needed in the interim (45). Multidisciplinary coordination between anaesthesiologists, neonatologists, surgeons, nursing staff remains very important for optimising recovery, reducing morbidity and improving survival in this vulnerable population inclusive of neonatal and paediatric cases (36). Postoperative anaesthetic and critical care considerations in TEF are described in (Table/Fig 4) (34),(35),(36),(37),(38),(39),(40),(41),(42),(43),(44),(45).

Contemporary Advances in Anaesthesia for Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF)

Recent advances into anaesthesia for TEF repair have further emphasised individualised, physiology-guided perioperative management which aimed at improving safety as well as helps accelerating recovery. Contemporary evidence supports that increasing usage of multimodal, opioid-sparing techniques in anaesthesia, combining non-opioid analgesics along with selective regional blocks, to minimise opioid-induced respiratory depression while also maintaining effective analgesia thereby facilitating earlier extubation (38). Airway management has evolved having routine incorporation of fibreoptic bronchoscopy for accurately localising fistula also optimising endotracheal tube positioning distal to the fistula, thereby reducing gastric insufflation and improving ventilation (28),(46).

Advances in the minimally invasive, endoscopic surgical approaches have influenced practice related to anaesthesia thereby necessitating refined ventilation strategies, enhanced monitoring, close intraoperative coordination with surgical team (47). Additionally, the adoption of multidisciplinary, protocol-based perioperative care pathways, supported by advanced neonatal intensive care as well as vigilant postoperative monitoring has contributed into improvement of respiratory stability, reduced perioperative morbidity in this high-risk neonatal population (47).

Future Directions, Research Gaps in Anaesthetic Management of Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF)

Future directions in anaesthesia for TEF repair highlight several important research gaps despite having recent advances in perioperative care (47). Current evidence underscores need for large, multicentre prospective studies for validating emerging strategies including opioid-sparing or opioid-free anaesthesia, optimal ventilation protocols and fibreoptic-guided airway algorithms; presently supported mainly by small or single-centre studies (38),(48). There is very limited high-quality informative data properly defining ideal criteria for extubation, ventilation strategies, as well as analgesic regimens across varying anatomical types and risk profiles related to TEF (29),(49). Furthermore, impact of different anaesthetic techniques on long-term respiratory, neurodevelopmental outcomes remains studied poorly regarding TEF patient care (50). Standardised outcome reporting, collaborative research frameworks are therefore very essential for developing evidence-based, precision-guided anaesthetic protocols which can help to improve short and long-term outcomes in neonates undergoing TEF repair (47),(50).















Conclusion

Anaesthetic management of TEF repair is very complex that further demands a thorough understanding of neonatal physiology, fistula-related pathophysiology and associated congenital anomalies. Optimal outcomes which are based upon meticulous preoperative stabilisation, precise airway and ventilation strategies, vigilant intraoperative monitoring as well as structured postoperative critical care. Contemporary advances inclusive of fibreoptic-guided airway management, lung-protective ventilation, opioid-sparing analgesia have helped to improve perioperative safety. However, significant evidence gaps also persist thus underscoring the need for multicentre, standardised research for refining anaesthetic protocols as well as improve both short and long-term neonatal outcomes.

Authors’ contribution: RLR: Contributed to the conceptualisation, literature review, data collection and drafting of the manuscript; SN: Provided supervision, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version; BS: Contributed to literature review, data interpretation, manuscript drafting and formatting of tables and figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/86179.24423

Date of Submission: Dec 31, 2025
Date of Peer Review: Mar 07, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jun 17, 2026
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:

• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 02, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jun 13, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jun 15, 2026 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com