Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 68358

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : April | Volume : 16 | Issue : 4 | Page : ZC07 - ZC12 Full Version

Prevalence of Oral Lesions among HIV Positive Patients Attending Antiretroviral Therapy Centre in Rural Area of Western Maharashtra


Published: April 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/48575.16201
Anita D Munde, Sunil S Mishra, Ravindra R Karle, Anuja A Deshpande, Ruchira V Sawade, Hemant Pawar

1. Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Rural Dental College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences (DU), Loni, Rahata, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Rural Medical College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences (DU), Loni, Rahata, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India. 4. Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Rural Dental College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences (DU), Loni, Rahata, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India. 5. Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Rural Dental College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences (DU), Loni, Rahata, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India. 6. Associate Professor, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Rural Medical College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences (

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anita D Munde,
Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Rural Dental College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences (DU), Loni, Rahata, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: anitakarle7@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The Oral Manifestations (OM) of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is indication of compromised immune status and disease progression. These Oral Lesions (OL) cause morbidity and affect quality of life of the patients.

Aim: To evaluate the association between OM in patients with HIV infection and their level of Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) count.

Materials and Methods: The study was designed as a descriptive, cross-sectional study for a duration of two years which included a total of 565 known HIV-positive individuals visiting the regional Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) centre for counseling and/or on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) were selected irrespective of age and sex. The OL were diagnosed using the presumptive criteria given by by the European Committee (EC) Clearinghouse, 1993. Oral and systemic manifestations were recorded and associated with CD4 counts. The data collected was subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) 8.0 software and p-value was considered significant at a level of 0.05.

Results: The male-to-female ratio was almost equal and 95.04% of the patients had reported heterosexual contact as the transmission route. The peak age of occurrence of HIV infection was during 31-40 years with the mean age of males and females 39.26 years and 34.46 years, respectively. Pulmonary tuberculosis (16.11%) and herpes zoster (16.81%) were the most common systemic manifestations. The prevalence of OM reported was 86.01% and was higher in females than in males. Intraoral melanotic pigmentation (50.08%) was the most common finding, followed by periodontitis (36.46%), linear gingival erythema (14.51%), Necrotising Ulcerative Gingivitis (NUG) (4.42%), candidiasis (8.67%), oral ulcers, herpes zoster (5.13%), herpes simplex virus infection (1.17%) and salivary gland disease (SGD) (0.7%). There was a significant association (p=0.0110) between OL and reduced CD4 count.

Conclusion: The OL occur commonly in HIV infection. The decrease in CD4 count is associated with a wide range of OM. The result from this study can be used as predictive marker for oral manifestations in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) based on the level of immune suppression and help in improving their quality of life.

Keywords

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus, Immunosuppression, Oral manifestations

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) emerged as a pandemic in the last three decades. It is an infection caused by the HIV and is characterised by profound immunosuppression that leads to opportunistic infections, secondary neoplasm and neurologic manifestations (1). United Nations (UN) AIDS (2018) data suggested that, in 2017, global prevalence of HIV among adults (aged 15-49 years) were an estimated 0.2% which equates to 2.1 million people living with HIV in India, because of its huge population. Despite the active awareness campaigns HIV, marked increase in the new infections and AIDS related deaths are seen which makes HIV infection a major health concern in India (2). In 2019, approximately 38 million people were living globally with HIV infection and out of this, 7.1 million people were unaware of their HIV positive status and with this rate a major AIDS pandemic threat by 2030 has been predicted by researchers (3),(4).

The OL are among the early signs of HIV infection and may suggest a possible HIV infection in undiagnosed cases as well as predict the progression to AIDS in patient who have not received any therapy (5). For patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) the presence of certain OM may also serve as surrogate markers for the efficacy of ART (6). Even though the prevalence of specific OL like candidiasis, hairy leukoplakia and Kaposi’s Sarcoma (KS) has been proven to be lower among patients on HAART, other conditions such as oral warts and salivary gland disease (SGD), as a result of immune reconstitution from the therapy initiation, has been found to be more prevalent in these patients (7),(8),(9). Laboratory parameters such as CD4 Count, T-lymphocyte count and viral load play an important role in evaluating the progression of disease as well as efficacy of antiretroviral therapy. In developed countries, specific OL and systemic manifestations have been documented to be related to immune suppression as indicated by CD4 counts that has been widely studied and reported (5),(8).

However, documentation of CD4 count and its association with systemic and OM in India particularly have been sparse. Moreover, considerable regional variations should be expected in the OM of HIV infection, depending on the population studied and clinical heterogeneity. Hence, the present study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of OM and systemic manifestations in HIV-positive patients and to associate with the CD4 count among the HIV population in rural Western Maharashtra of India.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional descriptive study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (PMT/PIMS/RC/2015/139 dated 30/10/2015) and was conducted for a period of two years between January 2016 to December 2017 among the HIV-positive patients visiting the regional ART centre of a Rural Medical College in Ahmednagar district. A total of 565 patients were included in the study and informed written consent was obtained from all the subjects.

Inclusion criteria: HIV-positive individuals visiting the regional ART centre for counseling and/or HAART treatment irrespective of their age and sex. Patients on ART as well as those not on ART were included within the study period.

Exclusion criteria: Those patients not willing to give the consent for the study were excluded.

Study Procedure

A detailed history was recorded from each patient on a case history proforma which included details such as demographic information, mode of transmission of disease, presence of systemic infections and stage of the disease. Although all patients were advised CD4 count, out of 565 patients, CD4 count of 541 patients could be retrieved. Three categories were considered with respect to CD4 count,above 500 was category A, CD4 count between 200 and 499 was category B and below 200 was category C. Personal Protective Equipment as per the standard norms for attending a HIV infected patients were donned. Detailed oral examination was carried out in natural light using disposable gloves, face masks, wooden spatula and sterile pieces of cotton and gauze. Brightly illuminating torch was used wherever necessary. The OL associated with HIV infection were diagnosed based on presumptive criteria given by the EC Clearing house on oral problems related to HIV infection and the World Health Organisation (WHO) collaborating centre on OM of the HIV (10).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 8.0 software. Means, standard deviations and percentages of various variables were calculated. A Chi-square test of association was utilised to find out the association between variables with p-value of <0.05 considered as statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were assessed for individual OL and OL in general when used as markers of immune suppression.

Results

The study group consisted of 565 HIV seropositive patients, out of which 282 (49.91%) were males, and 283 (50.09%) females. The mean age was 36.85±14.74 (range 8-76 years) (Table/Fig 1). The maximum numbers of cases were in the age group 31 to 40 years, (43.01%), followed by age group of 21 to 30 years (22.65%). Statistically, significant differences were found in the educational status between the sexes. Overall maximum patients (58.05%) had completed primary school education. Females showed dominance in primary school education status with 71.3%, but secondary school and college education was significantly less as compared to males. Majority of women (52.65%) were housewives/homemakers while males (44.68%) were farmers. Of the 565 patients, 479 were on ART. Heterosexual contact (95.04%) was the predominant mode of transmission of HIV infection; followed by vertical transmission i.e. mother to child (4.96%) (Table/Fig 2).

The mean CD4 count in males was 325.69±240.62, whereas it was 414.23±308.97 in females, statistically the difference was not significant. Out of 541 patients in whom CD4 count was available, 27.73% patients had CD4 count below 200 (Category C), 55.82% patients had CD4 count between 200 and 499 (Category B), and 20.15% had CD4 count above 500 (Category A) (Table/Fig 3) (11).

Most common systemic co-infection in HIV-positive male patients was tuberculosis while in female patients it was herpes zoster. The prevalence of systemic co-conditions between males and females was statistically significant (p=0.0180) (Table/Fig 4).

Out of total 150 patients in the category C, 74 (13.09%) had systemic manifestations. In the category B, out of 282 patients 117 patients (20.71%) had systemic manifestations, whereas 47 (8.31%) patients out of 109 patients of category A, had systemic manifestations. Statistically, no significant correlation (p-value=0.6229) between the systemic manifestations and CD4 count categories were found (Table/Fig 5).

The prevalence of OL in the present study was found to be 86.01% (n=486, where ‘n’ is number of HIV patients having OL). More females (91.13%) than males (80.91%) had OL and this was statistically not significant (p=0.54. Periodontitis was present in 206 patients (36.46%) (102 males and 104 females). Linear Gingival Erythema was present in 82 (14.51%) patients while gingivitis was present in 25(4.42%) patients. A total of 283 patients (50.08%) (140 males, 143 females) had brown to black oral pigmentation. There were more females (9.89%) than males (6.64%) with OC. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 6).

In the category of CD4 count below 200 (Category C) out of 150 patients, 126 (23.29%) had one or more oral manifestations. Two hundred forty four patients (45.10%) of Category B (CD4 count- 200-499) had OM while 101 (18.67%) patients of Category A (CD4 >500) showed presence of OM. Statistically, there was significant association between CD4 count and OM in the cases of HIV (p=0.0427) (Table/Fig 7).

When the correlation of individual OL with CD4 count was examined using Chi-square test, OC, LGE, Periodontitis, Gingivitis and melanotic oral pigmentation showed statistically significant correlation with lower CD4 cell count (p=0.0110) (Table/Fig 8).

The specificity of OL in general was found to be very high (87.46%) as compared to sensitivity (64.40%). The PPV of OL in general was 47.69% and NPV was 49.86%. In the present study, periodontitis (76.10%) and oral candidiasis (74.47%) were found to have the highest sensitivity, and thus in general are more reliable markers of immune suppression than any other OL in HIV positive patients. Amongst various OM, oral ulcers had the highest specificity (97.53%) followed by Herpes Zoster Virus (HZV) infection (96.47%) and thus individually (specifically) are more reliable markers of immune suppression than any other OL. The HZV infection also had a higher PPV (65.52%) followed by ulcerative gingivitis (52%) when compared individually.

Discussion

The OM seen in HIV patients are well established markers of disease progression, and their presence is an indication of a immunocompromised status. Although, there has been a significant decrease in the prevalence of the OM of HIV documented in Europe and USA in response to ART, in resource-limited countries where accessibility to health care and ART is limited, OM in HIV positive patients continues to place a considerable burden on these country’s health systems (12),(13).

The mean age of males and females in the present study was 39.26 years and 34.46 years respectively with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). The peak age of occurrence of HIV infection was during 31-40 years. This finding corresponds with the fact that sexually active age group is more prone to acquire HIV infection. Male-to-female ratio was almost 1:1. Male predominance was reported in various studies from India and other parts of the world (14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20). whereas a female predominance was reported in a study from the African region (21). In the present study, the most common transmission mode of the disease was the heterosexual route (95.04%) for both genders and almost 80% of the females had acquired the HIV infection from their spouses. These findings are similar to the findings of other studies from India (14),(15),(16),(16). This may be the reason explaining a higher number of female HIV patients in the present study population compared to developed countries where homosexuality and intravenous drug use were the common routes of HIV transmission. Statistically, there was no significant difference in the mean CD4 counts between males and females (325.69±240 and 414.23±308, respectively; p=0.1431) which is in accordance with the study by Vohra P et al., but is not in accordance with the study by Rangnathan K et al., (15),(22).

There is synergistic interaction between HIV and tuberculosis and they accentuate the progression of each other. In India, out of the 5.1 million HIV-infected patients, about half of them are co-infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and approximately 2 lacs of these co-infected individuals develop active TB each year in association with HIV infection (14),(23),(24). Overall prevalence of TB was 16.11% which was significantly less than the prevalence reported in previous studies, but was more than the prevalence reported in study by Rangnathan K et al., in 2004 (14),(15),(16),(22). Pulmonary TB (21.63%) was the most common systemic disease found in males which was less than the prevalence reported in the study by Vohra P et al., (22). The present study demonstrated no significant association between CD4 count and systemic diseases in the cases of HIV (p=0.6229), unlike the finding reported by Vohra P et al., (22).

In the present study, 486 (86.01%) patients exhibited OL associated with HIV infection. Prevalence reported in the present study was comparable with findings in other studies from India, South East Asia and rest of the world, while less prevalence was reported by Mwangosi IE and Majenge JM and Akaji EA et al., (14),(15),(17),(22),(23),(25),(26),(27),(28). However, most of these studies were hospital-based, and hence do not reflect the prevalence of oral lesions found in the general HIV-infected population because they are mostly hospital-based studies. Unlike the previous studies by Rangnathan K et al., and Campisi G et al., no significant difference was found in prevalence of OL in both genders in the present study (15),(29). Campisi G et al., found higher prevalence of OL in females which is in accordance with our study, whereas Rangnathan K et al., found higher prevalence of OL in males (15),(29).

An interesting observation in the present study was the occurrence of intraoral melanotic pigmentation (50.08%), which was the most common finding, as in the study by Denny CE et al., (42.6%) and Dongade S et al., (44.5%) (30),(31). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of intraoral pigmentation between males and females. Common sites of pigmentation were the palate and buccal mucosa. The pigmented areas were dark brown to brownish-black in colour and presented as diffuse or irregular patches. Palate and buccal mucosa were most common sites of pigmentation. Melanotic hyperpigmentation has been reported to be the second common lesion associated with HIV infection (19.54%) by Bodhade AS et al., and the third most common lesion (26.3%) by Ranganathan K et al., (15),(16). Increased melanin pigmentation in skin and oral mucosa have also been reported by various investigators in other countries (32),(33). Some of the reasons that have been put forward to explain the intraoral pigmentation are increased release of Melanocyte-Stimulating Hormone (MSH) due to deregulated release of cytokines in HIV disease; use of melanocyte stimulating drugs such as antiretrovirals, antifungals; and Addison’s disease. It has significantly higher rate of detection in developing countries (14%) compared with developed countries (4%) with higher prevalence reported in Asia (21%) compared with other continents (Africa 9%, America 8% and Europe 4%) (34). Various previous studies on the prevelance of OLs in HIV patients have been mentioned in (Table/Fig 9) (14),(15),(16),(17),(20),(22),(25),(26),(27),(28),(29),(30),(31),(33),(35),(36),(37).

The EC Clearing house classification criteria identified LGE, periodontitis and NUG as periodontal conditions that are strongly associated with HIV (10). In the present study, periodontitis was present in 206 patients (36.46%) (102 males, 104 females), LGE was present in 82 (14.51%) patients while gingivitis was present in 25 (4.42%) patients. Periodontal diseases may be the first clinical sign of HIV infection since the immunosuppression and subsequent susceptibility may alter the responses of the oral tissues as well as the microflora which explains the higher prevalence of periodontal disease. In addition to this, factors such as tobacco abuse, oral health negligence, side-effects of ART drugs contribute to worsen the periodontal health of these patients. Periodontal disease was about 25% more likely to be encountered in groups on ART compared with those who were not on treatment. It has been also suggested that this condition is associated with aging rather than HIV (15),(33). In the present study, prevalence of periodontal disease was reported to be 36.46% which is similar to studies conducted by Rangnathan K (33.2%) (15). Bodhade AS et al., and Vohra P et al., reported lower prevalence (5.26%, 16.6%, respectively) while it was higher in studies by Vishnu V et al., Denny CE et al., Sandeep K et al., 71.2%, 48%, 50%, respectively (Table/Fig 9) (14),(15),(16),(17),(20),(22),(25),(26),(27),(28),(29),(30),(31),(33),(35),(36),(37). In the present study, 14.51% of patients had LGE and 4.42% had gingivitis, whereas Bodhade AS et al., reported 10.27% and 8.52%, respectively, in their study (16). Akaji EA et al., reported higher prevalence of LGE (23.4%) (28), while Denny CE et al., reported lower prevalence (2.7%) (30). Gingival and periodontal diseases have been reported to be the predominant OLs in HIV-positive individuals from southern part of India (14),(15). Factors such as the stage of the disease, the risk group to which the patient belongs and criteria used for periodontal diagnosis also attributed to the varying rate of prevalence of periodontal diseases in HIV-infected patients in the literature.

Since the beginning of the endemic, until the present day. Oral Candidiasis (OC) is the most commonly reported OM of HIV in studies from around the world with highest reported prevalence in Africa (51%) and Asia (39%) (34). The overall prevalence of OC in the present study was 8.67% which is very less in comparison with various studies (15),(16),(22),(25),(28),(30). Reported prevalence of OC in HIV-positive patients ranges from 12% to 84.2% (7),(14),(36). The prevalence of OC was 9.89% in women and 6.64% in men, which is not in consistent with the report of Rangnathan K et al., which showed a higher predilection for men (15). In the present study, the pseudomembranous type was the most frequently encountered variant of oral candidiasis, this is consistent with the findings reported by Rangnathan K et al., Vohra P et al., and Akaji EA et al., while is not in consistent with the reports by Bodhade AS et al., and Moniaci D et al., where the cases of erythematous candidiasis outnumbered those of PC (15),(16),(20),(22),(28).

In the present study, ulcers not otherwise specified (UNOS) were reported in 5.13% of OL associated with HIV-infected patients. This frequency is less than the frequency reported by Bodhade AS et al., Tsang PCS and Samaranayake LP (11.8%, 12.3% respectively) (16),(37). Genetic and environmental factors such as poor oral health and malnutrition play a role in precipitating oral ulcers but very few studies were concerned with confounding causative factors when reporting the oral ulcers as an OM of HIV (34).

The prevalence of HSV infection, reported as either herpes labialis, herpetic ulceration or herpes simplex infection in most studies on OM of HIV published since 1980s, increased with time and Asia having the highest occurrence. The present study reported 1.17% of HSV infection which is comparable with the findings in some Indian studies (16),(22).

The HIV-infected persons are at risk of recurrences, which may be more severe with increasing immunosuppression (38). Reactivated herpes zoster infection may be the first clinical sign/evidence of HIV infection occurring at any stage of disease. The HZV infection comprised 5.13% of OL associated with HIV in the present study while 0.3% and 2.3% of herpes zoster was noted by Bodhade AS et al., and Vohra P et al., respectively (16),(22).

In previous studies in India, the prevalence of OHL was reported less frequently. Not a single case of OHL was reported in the present study. In two different studies by Ranganathan K et al., the reported prevalence of OHL was 0.33% and 2.7% respectively (14),(15). In contrast, Bodhade et al., found a higher prevalence (11.52%) of OHL in their study (16). Previous studies have suggested a strong association for a higher prevalence of OHL with homosexual men in the developed countries; this explains the lower prevalence of OHL in the Indian subcontinent. The prevalence may also be affected with the differences in diagnostic capabilities of the investigators, the exact reason, however, is not known. It has been noted that the reported prevalence of OHL has decreased from 26% in the 1980s to about 18% in the 1990s and subsequently to 12% in 21st century (12). The overall prevalence of OHL decreased considerably in groups on ART (10%) when compared with groups who were treatment naive (18%) (34).

Another similar finding from the present study consistent with other studies from Southeast Asia and Chinese population was the absence of Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS). Homosexuality as a possible risk factor for KS has been reported in previous literature (20),(34),(39),(40). In Asia, where heterosexual practice is the main risk behaviour of HIV transmission, the low prevalence of Kaposi’s Sarcoma (KS) is justifiable. The absence of KS in Chinese patients has also been reported (38).

Occurrence of HIV-associated Salivary Gland Disease (HIV-SGD) has been on a decline since 2000 in both developed and developing countries (12). Previous studies have associated SGD with AIDS and advanced HIV or as a side-effect of ART (34). Only four cases (0.70%) were found of SGD in the present study, while Bodhade AS et al., reported 0.3% and Akaji EA et al., reported 4.6% of SGD (16),(28).

When the presence of OL was correlated with CD4 count, a statistically non significant association was found between occurrence of OL in HIV-positive patients and reduction in CD4 count (p=0.3479). When the correlation of frequently occurring individual OL in the present study with CD4 count was examined using chi-square test, there was a significant association between OL and CD4 count (p=0.0110). This is in accordance with the previous studies (16),(22),(28).

The sensitivity and PPV of OL in general were (64.40%) and (47.69%) respectively, while specificity (87.46%) was very high in the present study. Patton LL reported a lower sensitivity (58.2%) compared to specificity (70.8%) and a PPV of 60.5%, for OL in general in their study (36). The sensitivity (81.30%) and PPV (61.70%) of OL in general were very high, while specificity (30.32%) was very low in the study by Bodhade AS et al., (16). The present study demonstrated the highest sensitivity (76.10%) for periodontitis and for OC (74.47%) than any other oral lesion. Amongst various OL’s, oral ulcers had the highest specificity (97.53%) followed by HZV infection (96.47%). The HZV infection had a higher PPV (65.52%) followed by ulcerative gingivitis (52%) when compared individually. These findings are not in accordance with the studies by Bodhade AS et al., and Patton LL as they reported highest specificity and PPV for candidiasis (16),(36).

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the study include small sample size, absence of control group and comparisons of OM in patients on HAART and those without it and hence future studies are recommended to study any gender differences and also to study the differences in oral manifestations in adult and paediatric age group.

Conclusion

Oral lesions occur commonly in HIV infection. In the present study there was a significant association between frequently occurring individual OL and CD4 count. The decrease in CD4 count is associated with a wide range of OM which can be used as prognostic marker for immune suppression in AIDS patients. Hence a comprehensive oral examination is important in HIV-infected individuals not only for diagnosis but also for monitoring of the disease progression. Hence, oral and dental care should be an integral part of HIV care programs to ensure regular screening for OL and their appropriate early management which will decrease the morbidity and increase the quality of life of HIV seropositive patients.

References

1.
Abbas AK. Diseases of immunity. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, editors. Robbins and Cotran’s Pathologic basis of diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. Pp.193-267.
2.
UNAIDS. Miles to go- Global AIDS Update 2018 [Internet]. Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2018. Available from: http://www.unaids.org. Accessed on: 7 September 2020.
3.
NAIDS. Global HIV & AIDS statistics- 2020 fact sheet [Internet]. Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2020. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet. Accessed on 7 September 2020.
4.
Piot P, Quinn TC. The AIDS pandemic-A global health paradigm. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2210-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Nokta M. Oral manifestations associated with HIV infection. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2008;5(1):05-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Ramírez-Amador V, Ponce-de-León S, Anaya-Saavedra G, Crabtree Ramírez B, Sierra-Madero J. Oral lesions as clinical markers of highly active antiretroviral therapy failure: A nested case-control study in Mexico City. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:925-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Ramírez-Amador V, Esquivel-Pedraza L, Sierra-Madero J, Anaya-Saavedra G, González-Ramírez I, Ponce-de-León S. The changing clinical spectrum of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-related oral lesions in 1,000 consecutive patients: A 12-year study in a referral center in Mexico. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003;82:39-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Hodgson TA, Greenspan D, Greenspan JS. Oral lesions of HIV disease and HAART in industrialized countries. Adv Dent Res. 2006;19:57-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Greenspan D, Canchola AJ, MacPhail LA, Cheikh B, Greenspan JS. Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on frequency of oral warts. Lancet. 2001;357:1411-12. [crossref]
10.
EC-Clearing house on Oral Problems Related to HIV Infection and WHO Collaborating Centre on Oral Manifestations of the Immunodeficiency Virus. Classification and diagnostic criteria for oral lesions in HIV infection. J Oral Pathol Med. 1993;22(7):289-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Patton LL, McKaig RG, EronJr JJ, Lawrence HP, Strauss RP. Oral hairy leukoplakia and oral candidiasis as predictors of HIV viral load. AIDS. 1999;13:2174-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Nicolatou-Galitis O, Velegraki A, Paikos S, Economopoulou P, Stefaniotis T, Papanikolaou IS, et al. Effect of PI-HAART on the prevalence of oral lesions in HIV-1 infected patients- A Greek study. Oral Diseases. 2004;10:145-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Challacombe SJ. Global inequalities in HIV infection. Oral Diseases. 2020;26(Suppl. 1):16-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Ranganathan K, Reddy BV, Kumarasamy N, Solomon S, Viswanathan R, Johnson NW. Oral lesions and conditions associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection in 300 South Indian patients. Oral Dis. 2002;6:152-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Ranganathan K, Umadevi M, Saraswathi TR, Kumaraswamy N, Solomon S, Johnson N. Oral lesions and conditions associated with human immunodeficiency infection in 1000 seropositive south Indian patients. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(Suppl):37-42.
16.
Bodhade AS, Ganvir SM, Hazarey VK. Oral manifestations of HIV infection and their correlation with CD4 count. Journal of Oral Science. 2011;53(2):203-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Bravo IM, Correnti M, Escalona L, Perrone M, Brito A, Tovar V, et al. Prevalence of oral lesions in HIV patients related to CD4 cell count and viral load in a Venezuelan population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11(1):e33-39.
18.
Ramírez V, González A, de la Rosa E, González M, Rivera I, Hernández C, et al. Oral lesions in Mexican HIV-infected patients. J Oral Pathol Med. 1990;19:482-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Anil S, Challacombe SJ. Oral lesions of HIV and AIDS in Asia: an overview. Oral Dis. 1997;3(Suppl 1):S36-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Moniaci D, Greco D, Flecchia G, Raiteri R, Sinicco A. Epidemiology, clinical features and prognostic value of HIV-1 related oral lesions. J Oral Pathol Med. 1990;19:477-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Tukutuku K, Muyembe-Tamfum L, Kayembe K, Odio W, Kandi K, Ntumba M. Oral manifestations of AIDS in a heterosexual population in a Zaire hospital. J Oral Pathol Med. 1990;19(5):232-34. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Vohra P, Jamatia K, Subhada B, Tiwari RV, Althaf MS, Jain C. Correlation of CD4 counts with oral and systemic manifestations in HIV patients. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:3247-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Sharma SK, Mohan A, Kadhiravan T. HIV-TB co-infection: Epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Indian J Med Res. 2005;121:550-67.
24.
Nittayananta W, Chanowanna N, Winn T, Silpapojakul K, Rodklai A, Jaruratanasirikul S et al. Co-existence between oral lesions and opportunistic systemic diseases among HIV-infected subjects in Thailand. J Oral Pathol Med. 2002;31:163-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Sharma G, Pai MK, Nagpal A. Prevalence of oral manifestations and their association with CD4/CD8 ratio and HIV viral load in South India. International Journal of Dentistry. 2011;2011:964278. 8 pages 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/964278. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Vishnu V, Saxena V, Verma H, Sharva V, Jain N, Sathpathy M. Oral health status & treatment needs of patient attending anti retro-viral therapy among HIV patient in Government Medical College, Bhopal- A cross-sectional study. Dent Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019;5:01-05. [crossref]
27.
Mwangosi IE, Majenge JM. Prevalence and awareness of oral manifestations among people living with HIV/AIDS attending counselling and treatment centres in Iringa Municipality, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research. 2011;13(3):01-08. [crossref]
28.
Akaji EA, Nwankwo OF, Nwadije JC. HIV-related oral lesions in patients on HAART: A preliminary study in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. Int J Med Health Dev. 2020;25:70-76. [crossref]
29.
Campisi G, Pizzo G, Mancuso S, Margiotta V. Gender differences in HIV-related oral lesions: An Italian study [Published erratum in Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:478]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91:546-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Denny CE, Ramapuram J, Bastian TS, Ongole R, Binnal A, Natarajan S, et al. Oral lesions in HIV/AIDS patients on a highly active antiretroviral therapy. World J Dent. 2016;7(2):95-99. [crossref]
31.
Dongade S, Wajid Sermadi ZM, Manjunath R, Priyadarshini C, Jayapala MS. Prevalence of oral manifestations among HIV-positive patients undergoing antiretroviral treatment visiting Chamarajanagar district hospital: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2017;29:288-91. [crossref]
32.
Langford A, Pohle HD, Zhang X, Reichart PA. Oral hyperpigmentation in HIV infected patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989;67:301-07. [crossref]
33.
Ceballos-Salobrena A, Gaitan-Cepeda LA, Ceballos-Garcia L, Lezama Del Valle D. Oral lesions in HIV/AIDS patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral treatment including protease inhibitors: A new face or oral AIDS? AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2000;14:627-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Tappuni AR. The global changing pattern of the oral manifestations of HIV. Oral Dis. 2020;26(Suppl.1):22-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13469. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Sandeep K, Mishra P, Warhekar S. Oral health status and oro-mucosal lesions in patients living with HIV/AIDS in India: A comparative study. AIDS Research and Treatment. 2014;2:01-04. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Patton LL. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of oral opportunistic infections in adults with HIV/AIDS as markers of immune supression and viral burden. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:182-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Arotiba JT, Adebola RA, Iliyasu Z, Babashani M, Shokunbi WA, Ladipo MMA, et al. Oral manifestations of HIV/Aids infection in Nigerian patients seen in Kano. Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research. 2005;7:176-81. [crossref]
38.
Tsang PCS, Samaranayake LP. Oral manifestations of HIV infection in a group of predominantly ethnic Chinese. J Oral Pathol Med. 1998;28:122-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Glesby MJ, Moore RD, Chaisson RE and The Zidovudine Epidemiology Study Group. Herpes zoster in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection treated with zidovudine. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:1264-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Barone R, Ficarra G, Gaglioti D, Orsi A, Mazzotta F. Prevalence of oral lesions among HIV infected intravenous drug abusers and other risk groups. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69:169-73. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/48575.16201

Date of Submission: Jan 18, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Apr 24, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jul 07, 2021
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 19, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jul 06, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Feb 27, 2022 (24%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com