Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 50295

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2022 | Month : April | Volume : 16 | Issue : 4 | Page : RE01 - RE03 Full Version

Therapeutic Drug Review on Romosozumab: The First Sclerostin Inhibitor


Published: April 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/50084.16256
Vijay Kumar Jain, Karthikeyan P Iyengar, Arvind Nune, Gaurav Kumar Upadhyaya

1. Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Delhi, India. 2. Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Southport and Ormskirk NHS Trust, Southport, Lancashire, United Kingdom. 3. Consultant, Department of Rheumatology, Southport and Ormskirk NHS Trust, Southport, Lancashire, United Kingdom. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Gaurav Kumar Upadhyaya,
Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli-229405, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: drgkupadhyaya@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a progressive skeletal disorder which is characterised by low bone mass, normal mineralisation and abnormal bone microarchitecture. This disruption of bone microarchitecture causes subsequent increase in bone fragility and raises risk of fractures. Osteoporosis is a growing public health problem and affects approximately over 200 million people worldwide. In the United Kingdom, it is estimated that around 3 million people have osteoporosis. Since the evolution of drug therapy for osteoporosis in the 1940’s with oestrogen therapy several approaches to developing novel therapeutics for osteoporosis in animal studies and clinical observations (e.g., oestrogen, calcitonin, and teriparatide) or opportunistic repurposing of existing compounds (e.g., bisphosphonates) to one driven by advances in fundamental bone biology (e.g., denosumab). The advent of biologic agents has provided a more specific and targeted approach to the treatment of osteoporosis. Sclerostin is a glycoprotein secreted by osteocytes and regulates bone metabolism by inhibiting activation of osteoblast function and bone formation. By inhibiting sclerostin, targeted therapeutic pharmacological agents are being developed to address severe osteoporosis and patients who do not respond well to primary line of medical management of osteoporosis. Romosozumab is humanised as a monoclonal antibody designed to target sclerostin. This review assesses the mechanism and current role of romosozumab in osteoporosis treatment.

Keywords

Antibodies, Bone density, Bone density conservation agents, Monoclonal, Osteocytes, Osteoporosis, Therapy

Osteoporosis is defined as having a Bone Mineral Density (BMD) that is 2.5 standard deviations or more below the average value for young healthy adults (usually referred to as a ‘T-score’ of -2.5 or lower) (1). Pharmacological drugs available for the treatment of osteoporosis can be divided into two categories: antiresorptive (or anticatabolic) and anabolic (bone forming) agents. Medical management of osteoporosis usually follows the recommended guidelines (2). Bone-forming agents are used for shorter durations of treatment, often in patients at extremely high risk of fracture, whereas antiresorptive agents are used as long-term treatments and sometimes after bone-forming agents (3). Typical medications are initiated depending on intervention thresholds defined using age, T-score and several risk factors.

Clinical prediction tools such as Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), osteoporosis self-assessment tool and the Khon Kaen osteoporosis study score for assessing people at risk for osteoporosis are used in planning management [3-5]. The challenge appears when patients do not respond to traditional line of management or have severe osteoporosis at risk of fragility fractures and unable to tolerate conventional agents. The advent of biologic agents has provided a more specific and targeted approach to the treatment of osteoporosis.

ROMOSOZUMAB

Mechanism of Action

Sclerostin is a glycoprotein secreted by osteocytes has been acknowledged found to play a critical role in bone metabolism by inhibiting activation of osteoblast function and bone formation. It inhibits Wnt signalling in osteoblast lineage cells, leading to decreased bone formation by osteoblasts and increased bone resorption by osteoclasts (6).

The Wnt signalling pathways are a group of signal transduction pathways which begin with proteins that pass signals into a cell through cell surface receptors and affect cell function. Wnt binds to LDL (Low Density Lipoprotein)-Receptor-related Protein (LRP) LRP5 and LRP6 co-receptors and Frizzled family receptor leading to activation of the Wnt signalling pathway in osteoblasts and bone formation. By inhibiting sclerostin, Romosozumab stimulates osteoblastic activity and increases bone formation (7).

Romosozumab is a bone-forming agent and a sclerostin antibody that exerts a dual effect on bone, increasing bone formation by osteoblastic activity and decreasing bone resorption resulting in insignificant improvement in BMD as compared to other available therapies. This dual action of the treatment with romosozumab leads to more pronounced increases in BMD than other treatment modalities and reduces the risk of vertebral and clinical fractures by 73% and 36% compared to placebo after 12 months and the sequential treatment regime (8). Romosozumab increases bone formation by promoting osteoblast differentiation and activity through conversion of bone lining cells to osteoblasts, osteoblastic differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells, and increased bone matrix production by mature osteoblasts (9). Romosozumab also decreases bone resorption by altering expression of osteoclast regulators including decreasing osteoclast activators RANK (Receptor Activator of Nuclear factor Kappa-B Ligand) and Colony Stimulating Factor-1 (CSF-1) and increasing osteoclast inhibitors OPG (Osteoprotegerin) and WISP (Wnt-1-Induced Secreted Protein-1) (10). Romosozumab thus is involved in increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption.

Romosozumab has been granted marketing authorization by major regulatory authorities in the world including Japan, approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the USA, Korea, Canada, Australia, and the European Union (11). It has recently been approved by the National Institute for Care and Health Excellence (United Kingdom) in patients with severe osteoporosis postmenopausal women at increased risk of fractures (12).

In India, recently the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation, Expert Committee have recommended for grant of permission for import and marketing of romosozumab in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who are at a high risk for fracture. This is defined as a patient with a history of osteoporotic fracture, or having multiple risk factors for fracture; or patients who have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy (13).

Dosages

Romosozumab injection is available in solution form for subcutaneous injection supplied in a single use prefilled syringe which delivers 1.17 mL of a solution containing 105 mg of romosozumab. For an adult, 210 mg once a month for 12 months, supplement with calcium and vitamin D, it is to be administered as two consecutive 105 mg injections at different injection sites into the thigh, abdomen or upper arm (14). This is to ensure adequate levels of calcium and vitamin D whilst undergoing treatment with romosozumab. It is advisable to correct hypocalcaemia before therapy is initiated. Monitoring for signs and symptoms of hypocalcaemia during therapy is essential (14).

Handling and Storage

It is advised to store romosozumab in a refrigerator between 2-8°C and protect it from light (12).

Therapeutic Uses

Romosozumab is predominantly recommended in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis and at increased risk of fractures (12). Recent guidelines from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology have given a route map of when romosozumab can be used (15). Romosozumab, which has anabolic effect with monoclonal antibody properties has a significant role in high-risk patients with osteoporosis (16). Romosozumab has found to be superior to alendronic acid and placebo combination in reducing the incidence of vertebral fractures (17). The beneficial effect of Romosozumab declines after 12 monthly doses, so its duration of use should be limited to 12 months. For further treatment, antiresorptive agents should be considered. A zoledronate follow-on regimen can maintain robust BMD gains achieved with romosozumab treatment (18). Romosozumab for 12 months followed by alendronate reduced the risk of vertebral, non vertebral, and hip fractures by 48%, 20% and 38%, respectively compared to alendronate after 2-3 years (8). Romosozumab also has a crucial role in patients with severe, refractory osteoporosis who have already tried Teriparatide for 18 months. This drug has an advantage over Teriparatide in that Romosozumab can be used in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients who had previous radiation exposure (19).

Side-effects (14)

Common or quite common: Arthralgia; headache; hypersensitivity; increased risk of infection; muscle spasms; neck pain; skin reactions.
• Uncommon: Cataract; hypocalcaemia; myocardial infarction; stroke.
Rare or exceedingly rare: Angioedema.
Frequency not known: Atypical femur fracture; cardiovascular event; osteonecrosis of jaw.

Precautions

1. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE): Romosozumab use was associated with an increased risk of MACE, a composite of total mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure-related hospitalisation, when compared to alendronate treatment (20). When compared to alendronate medication, rosozumab use was associated with an elevated risk of MACE, an aggregate of mortality risk, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure-related hospitalisation (20). Those who suffered a heart attack or cerebrovascular event 12 months before should not be started on romosozumab. 2If a patient has a heart attack or a cerebrovascular disease while on romosozumab, the medication should be stopped. In a patient with history of myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke, romosozumab should be used judiciously. The cause of the cardiovascular effect is due to its role in arterial calcification due to increased Sclerostin expression in smooth muscle tissue in areas of vascular calcification (21).

2. Osteonecrosis of the jaw: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) has been reported in patients receiving romosozumab (12). A routine oral and dental examination is required prior to the initiation of romosozumab treatment.

3. Atypical Femoral Fractures (AFF): Atypical femoral fractures were described in patients receiving romosozumab just like they have in those taking other bisphosphonates (22). It is important to rule out the possibility of an incomplete fracture due to an atypical fracture in any patient who complains of pain in their thighs. When a patient develops an atypical femoral fracture, they must be screened for signs and symptoms of femoral fracture in the contralateral leg. Patients should report new or unusual discomfort in the groin, hip, and thigh during treatment (23). Consideration should be given to stopping romosozumab treatment depending on benefit-risk analysis (24).

Contraindications to Romosozumab Use

Hypocalcaemia: Romosozumab is contraindicated in patients with hypocalcaemia. It should be corrected prior to initiating treatment with romosozumab. Patients should be monitored for signs and symptoms of hypocalcaemia. Patients should be adequately supplemented with calcium and vitamin D while on romosozumab (25).
History of myocardial infarction or stroke: It is advisable to discontinue romosozumab if myocardial infarction or stroke occurs during treatment (26).
Systemic hypersensitivity: Any patient who has had an adverse reaction to romosuzumab in the past, whether it was to romosozumab or any of its formulation, should not be treated with it. If the patient experiences an anaphylactic or allergic reaction while taking romosuzumab, the patient should stop taking the drug immediately (27).

Monitoring of Patient Parameters (25)

1. It is advisable to monitor serum calcium concentration in patients with severe renal impairment, or in those receiving dialysis- increased risk of hypocalcaemia.
2. It is advisable to correct hypocalcaemia before therapy is initiated. It is also prudent to monitor for signs and symptoms of hypocalcaemia during therapy.

Conclusion

Romosozumab with its unique mechanism of action provides a significant alternative for the treatment of severe osteoporosis. Romosozumab reduces the risk of vertebral and clinical fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, with a favourable balance of benefits and risks. Romosozumab is a promising emerging anabolic agent based on favourable results from several phase III trials in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and a single trial in men with osteoporosis. Romosozumab may thus expand the options for treating osteoporotic patients at high risk of fracture.

References

1.
Sözen T, Özişik L, Başaran N. An overview and management of osteoporosis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2017;4(1):46-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
National Institute for Care and Excellence. Osteoporosis: Assessing the risk of fragility fracture National Institute for Care and Excellence. 2017. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg146.
3.
World Health Organisation. WHO SCIENTIFIC GROUP ON THE ASSESSMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS AT PRIMARY HEALTH CARE LEVEL. World Health Organisation. 2004. [Available from: https://www.who.int/chp/topics/Osteoporosis.pdf.
4.
Skedros JG, Sybrowsky CL, Stoddard GJ. The osteoporosis self-assessment screening tool: A useful tool for the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):765-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Pongchaiyakul C, Wanothayaroj E. Performance of the Khon Kaen Osteoporosis Study (KKOS) score for identifying osteoporosis in men. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(8):1518-23.
6.
Karner CM, Long F. Wnt signaling and cellular metabolism in osteoblasts. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74(9):1649-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Hamaya E. Pharmacological characteristics and clinical study results of romosozumab (EVENITY(®); genetical recombination), a drug with novel mechanism of action to treat osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2020;155(4):258-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Langdahl B. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with bone-forming and antiresorptive treatments: Combined and sequential approaches. Bone. 2020;139:115516. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Sølling ASK, Harsløf T, Langdahl B. The clinical potential of romosozumab for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2018;10(5-6):105-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Glantschnig H, Fisher JE, Wesolowski G, Rodan GA, Reszka AA. M-CSF, TNFalpha and RANK ligand promote osteoclast survival by signaling through mTOR/S6 kinase. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10(10):1165-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
European Commission Approves EVENITY® (romosozumab) For The Treatment of Severe Osteoporosis In Postmenopausal Women At High Risk of Fracture. 2019.
12.
National institute for Care and Excellence. Romosozumab [Available from: https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drug/romosozumab.html.
13.
CDSC Organisation. Romosozumab 2020 [Available from: https://cdsco.gov.in/opencms/opencms/system/modules/CDSCO.WEB/elements/com.
14.
Food and Drug Administration. Romosozumab Medication Guide 2019 [Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/761062s000lbl.pdf.
15.
Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Diab DL, Eldeiry LS, Farooki A, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis-2020 update. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(Suppl 1):01-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Liu Y, Cao Y, Zhang S, Zhang W, Zhang B, Tang Q, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Climacteric. 2018;21(2):189-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Fukumoto S, Matsumoto T. Recent advances in the management of osteoporosis. F1000Res. 2017;6:625. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
McClung MR, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Reginster JY, Langdahl BL, Maddox J, et al. A single dose of zoledronate preserves bone mineral density for up to 2 years after a second course of romosozumab. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(11):2231-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Genant HK, Engelke K, Bolognese MA, Mautalen C, Brown JP, Recknor C, et al. Effects of Romosozumab Compared With Teriparatide on Bone Density and Mass at the Spine and Hip in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(1):181-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Choi BG, Rha SW, Yoon SG, Choi CU, Lee MW, Kim SW. Association of major adverse cardiac events up to 5 years in patients with chest pain without significant coronary artery disease in the Korean population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(12):e010541. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, Karaplis AC, Lorentzon M, Thomas T, et al. Romosozumab or Alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(15):1417-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, et al. Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1532-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Donnelly E, Saleh A, Unnanuntana A, Lane JM. Atypical femoral fractures: Epidemiology, etiology, and patient management. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2012;6(3):348-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Van de Laarschot DM, McKenna MJ, Abrahamsen B, Langdahl B, Cohen-Solal M, Guañabens N, et al. Medical Management of Patients After Atypical Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Recommendations From the European Calcified Tissue Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(5):1682-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Haas AV, LeBoff MS. Osteoanabolic agents for osteoporosis. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2018;2(8):922-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
National Institute for Care and Health Excellence (NICE). Romosozumab. Available from: https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drug/romosozumab.html.
27.
Blakely KK, Johnson C. New osteoporosis treatment means new bone formation. Nurs Womens Health. 2020;24(1):52-57. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/50084.16256

Date of Submission: Apr 26, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Aug 10, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 30, 2021
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 29, 2021
• Manual Googling: Aug 09, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Feb 05, 2022 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com