Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 129719

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : April | Volume : 16 | Issue : 4 | Page : QC19 - QC23 Full Version

Maternal and Foetal Outcomes in Early and Late Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy and their Association with Maternal Serum Bile Acid Levels: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: April 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52069.16272
Sangeeta Gupta, Shreya Bhattarai, Taru Gupta, Sarika Arora

1. Consultant and Associate Professor, Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, ESI PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India. 2. Postgraduate, Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, ESI PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India. 3. Head, Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, ESI PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India. 4. Head, Department of Biochemistry, ESI PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shreya Bhattarai,
B1/A9, 1st Floor, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, India.
E-mail: shreyabh7@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy (IHCP) also known as recurrent jaundice of pregnancy is a pregnancy specific benign liver disease presenting in the second and third trimester of pregnancy and is associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Aim: To study and compare the maternal and foetal outcomes in early and late IHCP and to evaluate the Serum Bile Acid (SBA) levels and its association with adverse maternal and foetal outcomes at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi.

Materials and Methods: This was an observational, prospective cohort study, conducted during September 2018 to March 2020 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ESI PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India. A total of 196 antenatal women with clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of IHCP with deranged liver function tests were grouped on the basis of period of gestation as early IHCP ( diagnosed ≤32 weeks) comprising of 40 women, and late IHCP (diagnosed >32 weeks), comprising of 156 women. They were further divided into four groups A, B, C, D on the basis of the maternal Serum Bile Acid (SBA) levels between 10-19 mmol/L, 20-29 mmol/L, 30-39 mmol/L and ≥40 mmol/L, respectively. Maternal outcomes such as caesarean rates, instrumental delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, hospital stay and foetal outcomes such as preterm birth, birth weight, Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration (APGAR) score, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission, intrauterine foetal demise and neonatal death were noted and association was found by Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s-exact test.

Results: A total of 196 women (mean age 25.64±3.8 years, 40 in Early IHCP and 156 in late IHCP) were analysed for foetomaternal outcomes and were further divided into group A (n=138), group B (n=27), group C (n=13), and group D (n=18) on basis of maternal SBA. Adverse maternal outcomes such as high caesarean rates, instrumental delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, prolonged hospital stay and adverse foetal outcomes such as preterm birth, low birth weight, low APGAR score, NICU admission, intrauterine foetal demise and neonatal death was more common in early IHCP in comparison to late IHCP (p<0.05). It was also observed that risk of adverse foetomaternal outcomes increased with increasing maternal SBA levels with maximum adverse outcomes seen in women with SBA ≥30 mmol/L i.e., Group C and D (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Women diagnosed with IHCP at an earlier gestation ≤32 weeks have more propensity towards adverse foetomaternal outcomes and significantly higher rate of adverse outcome was observed in patients with SBA level ≥30 mmol/L.

Keywords

Foetomaternal outcomes, Liver function tests, Meconium staining of liquor, Ursodeoxycholic acid

The IHCP also known as recurrent jaundice of pregnancy, cholestatic hepatosis, and icterus gravidarum is a pregnancy specific benign liver disease presenting in the second and third trimester of pregnancy, typically characterised by pruritis with a predilection for palms and soles without any evidence of skin lesions along with biochemical tests demonstrating elevated serum aminotransferases and/or elevated SBA levels, without any underlying liver pathology such as Haemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes, and Low Platelets (HELLP) syndrome, hepatitis, obstructive jaundice. There is a spontaneous relief of symptoms and laboratory abnormalities promptly after delivery or within one month postpartum (1). IHCP though relatively non threatening to women, has been reported to have important foetal implications.

Affected pregnancies have been associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. It has been found to be associated with increased risk of preterm delivery, meconium staining of amniotic fluid, foetal bradycardia, foetal distress and foetal demise (2). The incidence of IHCP has been found to be variable, affecting 0.1-1.5% of the population of Central and Western Europe and North America, and 1.5-4% in Chile and Bolivia (1). There has been a rising trend of IHCP in India, with reported incidence rate rising from 0.79% (3) to 2.73% (4) over the decade. Although specific predictors for poor foetal outcome have not been consistently identified, higher bile acid levels >40 mmol/L were found to be associated with higher rates of foetal complications. Patients with IHCP are induced after 37 weeks of period of gestation (5). Thus, this group of patients also deals with a higher frequency of complications such as instrumental delivery and higher caesarean rates as compared to spontaneous labour. Studies conducted on IHCP shows adverse foetal outcomes in 30-70% of affected pregnancies (6),(7). According to literature,70% pregnancies with IHCP present in the third trimester (mean 31 weeks) (8).

With increasing prevalence of IHCP in India and its well-known foetomaternal implications, the authors here aimed to compare the foetomaternal outcomes between early (≤32 weeks) and late IHCP (>32 weeks), focusing on determining whether the timing of onset of IHCP affects the foetomaternal outcomes.

Material and Methods

This was a prospective, cohort, observational study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ESI PGIMSR, New Delhi, India from September 2018 to March 2020. An ethical clearance has also been taken from the Institutional Ethical Committee. (Reg no ESIPGMSR-IEC/2018009). Informed consent was obtained from all the patients for being included in this study.

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women in second and third trimester with pruritis predominant on the palm and soles along with deranged liver function tests and raised SBA levels (Aspartate transaminase >35 IU/L, Alanine transaminase >45 IU/L, SBA >10 mmol/L) which could not be defined by any other dermatologic, liver, gall bladder pathology were included in the study.

Excluding criteria: Women with underlying skin disorders, allergies, pre-eclampsia, HELLP, acute fatty liver of pregnancy, chronic liver diseases (symptomatic cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, primary biliary cirrhosis) or any ongoing infections affecting the liver were excluded from the study

Sample size calculation: Assuming (p)=50% as the expected foetal outcome [6,7] with 10% margin of error, the minimum required sample size at 5% level of significance was196 patients.

A total of one ninety six (196) antenatal women with clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of IHCP with deranged liver function tests in second or third trimester were included. In this study, 80% of patients presented after 32 weeks of pregnancy therefore patients were grouped as early IHCP (diagnosed ≤32 weeks) and late IHCP (diagnosed > 32 weeks). Forty (40) women were diagnosed before 32 weeks of period of gestation and one fifty six (156) women were diagnosed after 32 weeks. They were further divided into four groups A, B, C, D on the basis of maternal SBA levels ranging between 10-19 mmol/L, 20-29 mmol/L, 30-39 mmol/L and ≥40 mmol/L, respectively. Foetomaternal outcomes (mode of delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, prolonged hospital stay, foetal birth weight, APGAR scores, meconium stained liquor, preterm, perinatal death, NICU admission) among each group were compared.

The SBA was estimated on automatic biochemistry analyser (Beckman Coulter) using the commercial kit from DIALAB. Patients were followed during their course of pregnancy till their delivery through regular antenatal checkups in the Outpatient Department (OPD) and additional visits if necessary. Topical emmolients and Ursodeoxycholic acid (UCDA 10-15 mg/kg/day upto maximum 300 mg 8 hourly per oral) was advised to all patients depending on the severity of disease, aiming to achieve completion of 37 weeks of gestation according to Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) Green top guidelines 2011 (5).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were analysed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 software. Continuous variables were presented as mean±SD. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s-exact test was used to determine the relationship between two categorical variables. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant and p-value <0.001 was considered highly significant.

Results

Total of 196 pregnant patients , aged 18-40 years, were analysed in the study, with mean and median age of 25.64±3.8 years and 25 years respectively. Majority of patients 79.59% were diagnosed after 32 weeks of period of gestation (range 26.43-40.43) (Table/Fig 1). The median gestational age at diagnosis was 36 weeks (range 34-37.57) (Table/Fig 1).

In majority of patients (70.41%) SBA values ranged from 10-19 mmol/L (Table/Fig 1).

Maternal outcomes: In present study, 58.16% patients had normal vaginal delivery and 5.61% had instrumental vaginal delivery section(p<0.001). The most common indication for caesarean section was foetal distress (29.57%) (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3).

A highly significant difference in maternal outcomes between the early and late IHCP group was noted (p<0.05) with a higher rate of caesarean section, instrumental vaginal delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, prolonged hospital stay and blood transfusion in early IHCP group (Table/Fig 4). It was observed that the rates of adverse maternal outcomes increased with increasing maternal SBA levels (p<0.001) (Table/Fig 5).

Foetal outcomes: Early IHCP was associated with statistically significant higher chances of low birth weight, low APGAR, Meconium Stained Liqor (MSL), preterm delivery, neonatal death, NICU admission and Intrauterine Deaths (IUDs) as compared to late IHCP (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 6).

The rate of adverse foetal outcomes was observed to be increasing with increasing maternal SBA levels with maximum complications noted in group D (p <0.05) (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

The main finding was that IHCP diagnosed before 32 weeks of period of gestation is associated with a higher rate of adverse foetal and maternal complications. Over the years foetal outcome in IHCP has been closely studied. However, there is minimal data on adverse maternal outcomes of IHCP as it is thought to be relatively non threatening to women (9),(10).

In present study, a significantly higher rate of adverse maternal outcomes such as caesarean section, instrumental vaginal delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, prolonged hospital stay, blood transfusion was noted in group C and D and those diagnosed before 32 weeks. Kenyon AP et al., has reported the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage in women with IHCP to be 17% (11). On the contrary, DeLeon A et al., found postpartum haemorrhage in only 2.6% patients after normal vaginal delivery and 6.3% in caesarean delivery in women with IHCP (12). Similarly, Furrer R et al., evaluated 348 women with IHCP and came to the conclusion that women with IHCP do not show increased postpartum blood loss when actively managed with ursodeoxycholic acid (13). In this study 9.18% women had postpartum haemorrhage, out of which 61.11 % women had SBA greater than 40 mmol/L and postpartum haemorrhage was observed in patients who did not receive ursodeoxycholic acid for a substantial amount of time owing to non compliance and late presentation to OPD.

In present study, a higher rate of adverse foetal outcomes such as low birth weight, low APGAR, meconium staining of liquor, preterm birth, NICU admission, intrauterine death, neonatal death was noted in early IHCP group and women with SBA ≥30 mmol/L. Similar conclusions have been made by Labbe C et al., in a retrospective study conducted to compare the risk for adverse pregnancy and foetal outcomes in early (<33 weeks) or late IHCP (≥33 weeks) particularly threatened preterm birth and prematurity (1). Jin J et al., in his retrospective study, divided IHCP patients into early onset (≥28 weeks) and late onset group (<28 weeks), they further divided the women into two groups on the basis of SBA level, these groups were A: mild IHCP (SBA <40 mmol/L) and B: severe IHCP (SBA ≥40 mmol/L) and found significantly elevated SBA levels and higher incidence of meconium staining, foetal distress, neonatal asphyxia, premature delivery and caesarean section in early onset group when compared to late onset IHCP. Also, the proportion of women with adverse foetomaternal outcomes was higher in group B than in group A (14). Higher SBA levels (≥40 mmol/L) have been found to be associated with higher rate of foetal complications (1),(15). Herrera CA et al., examined the perinatal outcomes associated with cholestasis of pregnancy according to bile acid level in 487 women with IHCP and also came to a conclusion that severe cholestasis (SBA ≥100 mmol/L) is associated with neonatal morbidity that antenatal testing may not predict (16), similar to this study where antenatal testing could not predict the neonatal outcomes.

In present study, although adverse foetomaternal outcomes were highest in group D, the rate of adverse outcomes were comparable between the two groups, C and D. These adverse foetomaternal maternal outcomes could be owing to detrimental effect of high bile acid levels on cardiomyocytes causing arrhythmias which explains the incidence of stillbirth and sudden intrauterine foetal demise in IHCP. The vasoconstrictive effect of bile acid on placental chorionic veins also possibly explains the occurrence of foetal distress, asphyxia and death (17). Although treatment with UDCA has been seen to bring about improvement in liver function tests and SBA levels, clear evidence of improvement in neonatal outcomes is sparse (18). Genetic defect in canalicular transporters have been found to be associated with IHCP, such as mutations associated with ABCB4 (MDR3) which is a transporter responsible for bile salt dependent bile flow, ABCB2 which is responsible for transport of bilirubin and bile acid across canalicular membrane and variations in NR1H4, a bile acid sensor that protects liver from bile acid toxicity by regulation of transcription genes involved in bile acid homeostasis (15).

Thick meconium was observed in all 6 cases of IUD (3.06%), belonging to group C and D. Some research in animals suggest that bile acids stimulate foetal colonic motility signifying the presence of meconium in amniotic fluid in IHCP to be a physiological reaction rather than assign of distress (1), which may be the reason behind the unpredictability of antenatal tests in foreseeing the adverse foetal outcomes. Delivery of IHCP patients has been recommended at 37-38 weeks (5). Various studies have come to a conclusion that a more aggressive approach of elective delivery at <37 weeks of Period of Gestation (POG) in women with SBA ≥100 mmol/L and that if SBA is ≤40 mmol/L, expectant management can be considered (17). The strengths of this study were that a large number of patients were included in this study (196) with both deranged liver function test as well as raised SBA level along with clinical signs and symptoms being taken into consideration for diagnosis of IHCP. No other study has been conducted focusing on the impact of earlier onset of disease on the foetomaternal outcomes.

Limitation(s)

Only a single highest value of SBA was taken into consideration, the possible improvement in SBA levels following treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid has not been taken into consideration due to lack of resources.

Conclusion

Antenatal women who were diagnosed with IHCP before 32 weeks of gestation have a greater risk of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes as compared to women who present with IHCP after 32 weeks. Adverse foetomaternal outcome also associates with increasing maternal SBA level and significantly, higher rate of adverse outcome was observed in patients with SBA level ≥30 mmol/L. An earlier onset of symptoms and gestational age at diagnosis should also be considered in predicting the disease course and probable outcome in IHCP.

References

1.
Labbe C, Delesalle C, Creveuil C, Dreyfus M. Early and later intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP): Study of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46(4):388-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Alakananda, Bhattacharya A, Kavita. Fetomaternal outcome in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences. 2016;4(10D):3837-41.
3.
Dang A, Agarwal N, Bathla S, Sharma N, Balani S. Prevalance of liver disease in pregnancy and its outcome with emphasis on obstetric cholestasis: An Indian scenario. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India. 2010;60(5):413-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Pegu B, Mehrotra M, Yadav A, Sahoo PSK. Cholestasis of pregnancy: A prospective analysis from a South Andaman teaching hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(5):1895-98. [crossref]
5.
Obstetric Cholestasis. RCOG Green-top guideline No. 43, 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg43/.
6.
Kondrackiene J, Beuers U, Zalinkevicius R, Taushel HD, Gintautas V, Kucsinkas C. Predictors of premature delivery in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2007;13(46):6226-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Rook M, Vargas J, Caughey A, Bacchetti P, Rosenthal P, Bull L. Fetal outcomes in pregnancy complicated by Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in a Northern California Cohort. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e28243. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Ghosh S, Chaudhuri S. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A comprehensive review. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58(4):327. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Fisk NM, Storey GNB. Fetal outcome in obstetrics cholestasis. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1998;95(11):1137-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Rioseco AJ, Ivankovic MB, Manzur A, Hamed F, Kato SR, Parer JT, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A retrospective case-control study of perinatal outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1994;170(3):890-95. [crossref]
11.
Kenyon AP, Piercy CN, Girling J, Williamson C, Tribe RM, Shennan AH. Obstetric cholestasis, outcome with active management: a series of 70 cases. BJOG. 2002;109(3):282-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
DeLeon A, De Oliveira GS, Kalayil M, Narang S, McCarthy RJ, Wong CA. The incidence of coagulopathy in pregnant patients with IHCP: Should we delay or avoid neuraxial analgesia? J Clin Anesth. 2014;26:623-27. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.04.013. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Furrer R, Katarina W, Schaffer L. Postpartum blood loss in women treated for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2016;128(5):1048-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Jin J, Pan SL, Huang LP, Yu YH, Zhong M, Zhang GW. Risk factors for adverse fetal outcomes among women with early- versus late– onset intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2015;128(3):236-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Floreani A, Gervasi TM. New insights on intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Cin Liver Dis. 2016;(20):177-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Herrera CA, Manuck TA, Stoddard GJ, Varner MW, Esplin S, Clark EAS, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2018;31(14):1913-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Brouwers L, Koster MP, Page-Christiaens GC, Kemperman H, Boon J, Evers IM, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Maternal and fetal outcomes associated with elevated bile acid levels. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015;212(1):100.e1-7. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Ovadia C, Sajous J, Seed PT, Patel K, Williamson NJ, Attilakos G. Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2021;6(7):547-58. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52069.16272

Date of Submission: Aug 29, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 11, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Feb 12, 2022
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 31, 2021
• Manual Googling: Feb 10, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Feb 22, 2022 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com