Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 14517

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : April | Volume : 16 | Issue : 4 | Page : PC16 - PC20 Full Version

Predictors of Mortality in Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage: A Prospective Interventional Study from a Tertiary Care Centre, Kerala, India


Published: April 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/53246.16275
Shameej Koloth Vayalipath, Rajeev Mandakaparambil, Prakasan Kannoth, Jaleel Padinhareyiel, Shinihas Vattaparambil, Binu Areekal

1. Senior Resident, Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 5. Consultant Neurosurgeon, Department of Neurosurgery, Kims Al-Shifa Super Speciality Hospital, Perunthalmanna, Malappuram, Kerala, India. 6. Additional Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Prakasan Kannoth,
Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College,
Thrissur, Kerala, India.
E-mail: drprakasank2002@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage (SICH) is a potentially life-threatening condition associated with a high mortality and morbidity. Early assessment of outcome is important to optimise the therapeutic efforts. This study helps in the prediction of outcomes in SICH based on clinical and radiological predictors, so as to effectively utilise the treatment resources.

Aim: To assess clinical and radiological predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with SICH at a Tertiary Care Centre, Kerala, India.

Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional study included 100 patients admitted with SICH at Government Medical college, Kozhikode, Kerala, India, from 1st May 2019 to 30th January 2020. The assessed variables include age, sex, mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission, Intracerebral Haemorrhage (ICH) volume, ICH site, ICH score and treatment provided (conservative/surgery). The dependent variable was 30 day mortality. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the association between the mortality and independent variables. A binary logistic regression was also performed. Statistical analysis performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0. The p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Among the total of 100 SICH patients, males were 52% and females were 48%; the mean age was 67±11 years. The medical history of SICH patients predominantly showed hypertension (90%), diabetes (45%) and alcohol abuse (33%). Out of total, 70% cases were managed conservatively, and 30% cases were managed surgically. The short-term outcome of 30 day mortality was 40% and the survival rate was 60%. Univariate analysis inferred that the location of bleed (p-value=0.0002), volume of ICH (p-value <0.001), ICH score (p-value 0.003) and type of management (p-value <0.001) were statistically significant predictors for 30 day mortality in SICH patients.

Conclusion: The location of bleed, volume of ICH, ICH score and type of management were statistically significant predictors for 30 day mortality in SICH patients.

Keywords

Clinical, Determinants, Intracerebral haemorrhage score, Prognosis, Radiological

The Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage (SICH) occurs within brain parenchyma without any history of recent trauma or surgery. Common causes are hypertension, coagulopathy, amyloid angiopathy, tumors and vascular anomalies. Of these major risk factors identified are advancing age and hypertension (1).

Approximately, 4-14% of all strokes comprises SICH, with a higher incidence in Asian countries compared to the West (2),(3). Intracerebral Haemorrhage (ICH) is more common as well as more likely to result in death (30 day mortality of 44%) or major disability compared to cerebral infarction or Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH) (4).

The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines for management of spontaneous intracerebral bleed recommended to use widely accepted severity assessing scores like Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and ICH scores for clear communication among medical professionals and objective assessment (5). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is the most extensively used deficit rating scale for stroke (6). Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is used for measurement of neurologic disability affecting daily activities of patients suffering from stroke or any other neurological disease (7).

Various studies have been conducted determine the relationship between clinical and radiological factors and poor outcome in ICH (8),(9),(10). Some biochemical and haematological parameters like increased white blood cell count elevated renal function and liver function tests at the time of admission in ICH patients have been associated with poor outcome in patients (11).

Most of the literature on morbidity and mortality predictors is available from the West and some East Asian countries. Computerised Tomography (CT) scanning is the initial diagnostic modality of choice in SICH, as it clearly differentiates haemorrhagic from ischemic stroke. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and angiography may be considered wherever appropriate (12),(13). The radiological predictors of poor outcome in ICH patients include- haematoma location, haematoma volume, haematoma expansion, perihaematomal edema, intraventricular haemorrhage, hydrocephalus, spot sign and swirl sign (14).

This prospective interventional study was designed to primarily assess the clinical and radiological predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with SICH at a tertiary care institution in Kerala.

Material and Methods

This hosital-based, prospective, interventional study was conducted in Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India, between 1st May 2019 to 30th January 2020. The ethical approval was obtained (IEC no. GMCKKD/RP2019/IEC/176).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Patients attending the casualty with SICH during the study period were included in the study. Patients with subdural and epidural haematoma, patients with anticoagulant or coagulopathy related haemorrhage, patients who denied informed consent and patients aged <15 years and >70 years were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: According to a prospective study done by Rahmani F et al., 10 patients with ICH were included and it was found that the 30 day mortality rate was 57% (6). Taking this study as a reference, we have considered the values for calculating sample size.

Required minimum sample size (nr) based on proportion is given by the formula:

nr=4pq / d2

Here, p=% mortality (57%)
q=100-p (43%)
d=precision (10%)

Therefore, nr=4×57×43/102

nr=98.04˜98

Data collection: Presenting complaints of patients at the time of admission like headache, vomiting, seizure altered consciousness, fever and focal neurological deficits were recorded. Clinical examination findings like vitals, systemic examination findings, GCS sore and ICH score at the time of admission were also noted (15),(16).

Study Procedure

All patients took plain CT at the time of admission, after 24 hours and later at the time of discharge or if there was deterioration of score. Details on CT scan like site of bleed, volume of haematoma (using ABC/2 formula), presence or absence of intraventricular extension or hydrocephalus and extent of midline shift in millimeters were recorded.

• Haematoma volume was estimated by ABC/2 method (17),
where

- A is the greatest diameter on slice with the largest haemorrhage,
- B is the diameter which is perpendicular to A, and
- C is the number of axial slices with bleeding multiplied by slice thickness .
• The location/site of haematoma was broadly divided into
- supratentorial (lobar and basal ganglia)
- infratentorial (cerebellum and brainstem).
• The depth of bleeding from the cortical surface (<10 mm or >10 mm) was recorded.
• Details of neurosurgical intervention whether surgical or
conservative, time of surgical intervention was also recorded.

The treatment provided was either medical conservative therapy or early surgical evacuation, which is done within 72 hours of diagnosis of ICH. Primary outcome was either death or survival within the hospital. Follow-up was done up to 30 days of occurrence. The observations were made to assess the short-term outcome and short-term mortality.

Statistical Analysis

The assessed variables include age, sex, ICH volume, ICH site and treatment provided (conservative/surgery). The dependent variable was 30 day mortality. Univariate analysis was done using chi-square test for qualitative variables and t-test for quantitative variables. A binary logistic regression was also performed. Statistical analysis performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0. The p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 100 patients with SICH, were studied whose details fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 67±11 years with males 52% and females 48%.

(Table/Fig 1) shows the distribution of symptoms in SICH patients. These included headaches in 44 patients (44%), vomiting in 56 (56%), seizures in 6 (6%), fever in 33 (33%), altered consciousness in 60 (60%), and focal neurological deficits in 36 (36%).

(Table/Fig 2) shows medical history of patients with SICH. These include: hypertension (90%), diabetes (45%), alcohol abuse (33%), haematological malignancy (2%), known vascular abnormality (10%), intracranial tumors (3%), previous stroke (8%), anaemia/thrombocytopenia (6%), and hypothyroidism (1%). On examination, the average pulse rate was 56/minute, blood pressure was more than 160/90 mmHg (in 90% of cases) and temperature was 102°F (in 30% of cases). Forty patients (40%) of cases had an initial GCS in the range of 9 to 12. The mean GCS score was 9±3.

(Table/Fig 3) shows the distribution of ICH score among the patients with SICH. Most of the patients (36%) had an ICH score of 3.

(Table/Fig 4) shows the location of ICH as per the CT scan findings. The most common location was basal ganglia (45%), followed by lobular (43%), cerebellum (6%), and brainstem (6%). It can be inferred that ICH haemorrhage more commonly involves supratentorial region than infratentorial region. There were 12 patients (12%) with infratentorial bleed and 88 (88%) patients with supratentorial bleed.

The CT scan showed intraventricular extension in 43% of cases; subarachnoid haemorrhage in 11% of cases; and hydrocephalus in 6% of cases. The mean ICH volume was 44±16 mL. The mean midline shift was 6.6±4.4 mm. The depth of haematoma was <10 mm in 30%, and >10 mm in 70%.

Conservative treatment was given to 70% patients, while surgery was performed in 30% patients. Radiographic Images of various sites of ICH, pre and postoperative images are given below in (Table/Fig 5).

Intraoperative image of lobar ICH is presented in (Table/Fig 6). It was seen that 40% patients died during the follow-up period of 30 days, i.e., 30 day mortality was 40%. The survival rate for the 30 day follow-up period was found to be 60%. Details of study are given in (Table/Fig 7).

Short-term outcome (30 days): 40 patients died within the 30 day follow-up period; among which 22 died during the first 48 hours of diagnosis. Hence, the 30 day mortality for our study was 40%; and the survival rate was 60%. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the variables in the two groups, i.e., survived group and died group. The characteristics of both the study groups referring to the 30 day mortality are as shown below in (Table/Fig 8). The factors that were found to be significant in univariate analysis were also tested using binary logistic regression. The R2 value which shows the percentage of variation that could be explained with the model was 0.606. The factors which were found to be significantly associated with 30 days mortality in patients in ICH were ICH volume, location of bleed, ICH score and type of management. A critical bleeding volume of 33 mL (supratentorial) and 22 mL (infratentorial) were found to be associated with poor short-term outcome.

The ICH volume had a p-value of 0.001 and an odds ratio of 1.64, ICH score had a p-value of 0.044 and odds ratio of 1.728, Mode of management had p-value of 0.034 and odds ratio of 0.23 on logistic regression. A higher ICH volume and a higher ICH score were found to be risk factors for morality whereas conservative management was found to be protective with less mortality. The location of bleed even though was found to be significantly associated with mortality in univariate analysis was not found to be significant in binary logistic regression. Details are given in (Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

The SICH is a medical emergency with potentially life-threatening consequences for the patients. Hence, its optimum management is of utmost importance, so that appropriate treatment option is provided by virtue of the prediction of 30 day mortality (18).

This study was designed to evaluate the short-term outcome and the predictors of 30 day mortality. Our study showed a 30 day mortality rate of 40%. In a study by Bhatia Ret al., 30 day mortality was 32.7% (70 out of 214 patients) (19). Consistent with the previous study (20), the age, gender, co-morbidities like hypertension, diabetes, and alcohol abuse were not the significant outcome predictors in the present study. The present study confirmed that the ICH volume was one of the strongest predictors of outcome in patients with SICH. In study by Hegde A et al., volume more than 30 mL with intraventricular extension and hydrocephalus was indicator of poor outcome (21).

It was shown that initial GCS and ICH volume can be considered to determine the suitable treatment for the patient. In general, conservative treatment is advised if GCS is atleast 13, or if ICH volume is <30 mL irrespective of GCS score. Surgical treatment is advised if GCS is less than 12 and ICH volume is atleast 30 mL. GCS score less than 8 was associated with poor outcome (21). Endoscopic surgery is less invasive and effective in removal of ICH at GCS of >9 (22).

The current study showed that an and a critical bleeding volume of 33 mL (supratentorial) and 22 mL (infratentorial) are associated with poor short-term outcome. This is consistent with the study done by Safatli DA et al., where supratentorial bleeding volume more than 32 mL and infratentorial bleeding volume more than 21 mL correlate with poor outcome (23). However, the cut-off values for ICH volume significantly differ with various studies (23). The present study observation that infratentorial location of ICH has a higher 30 day mortality, is also consistent with the aforementioned study (23).

There is a vague insignificant observation showing that early surgical intervention is associated with a higher survival rate. Similar results were obtained in a study conducted by Luostarinen T et al., early surgery is associated with lower mortality (24). This could possibly emphasise the importance of “timely” surgical intervention in reviving the patient. The present study also showed the importance of validated outcome grading scores like ICH score and ICH-GS in the accurate prediction of 30-day mortality in SICH patients.

The current study showed that 30 day mortality increased in accordance with increasing ICH score values. Most of the surviving patients was disabled at discharge. Surgery had no significant improvement in mortality. Similar were the results of study by Prasad K et al., which considered further randomised controlled studies were needed to determine who might benefit from surgery (25).

Limitation(s)

This was a short-term outcome study and there is a definite need for more studies evaluating the long-term outcomes in patients with SICH. The decision for surgical or conservative management varies between various physicians/neurosurgeons, based on their subjective knowledge and risk prediction.

Conclusion

The 30 day mortality in patients with SICH was 40%. The outcome grading scores like ICH score predict the 30 day mortality accurately. The imaging findings of baseline ICH volume and its location were found to be the most important radiological predictors of 30 day mortality in patients with spontaneous primary ICH.

References

1.
Broderick J, Gorelick PB, Alter M. Handbook of Neuroepidemiology. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1994:141-167.
2.
Chuang YC, Chen YM, Peng SK, Peng SY. Risk stratification for predicting 30-day mortality of intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;6:441-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Schwarz S, Hafner K, Aschoff A, Schwab S. Incidence and prognostic significance of fever following intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2000;54:354-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Broderick J, Brott T, Tomsick T, Miller R ,Huster G. Intracerebral hemorrhage is more than twice as common as subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1993;78:188-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, Becker K. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46:2032-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Rahmani F, Rikhtegar R, Ala A, Farkhad-Rasooli A, Ebrahimi Bakhtavar H. Predicting 30-day mortality in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage: Evaluation of the value of intracerebral hemorrhage and modified new intracerebral hemorrhage scores. Iran J Neurol. 2018;17 (1):47-52.
7.
Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH score: A simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32:891-97. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Castellanos M, Leira R, Tejada J, Gil-Peralta A, Dávalos A, Castillo J; Stroke Project, Cerebrovascular Diseases Group of the Spanish Neurological Society. Predictors of good outcome in medium to large spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:691-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Fieschi C, Carolei A, Fiorelli M, Argentino C. Changing prognosis of primary intracerebral hemorrhage: Results of a clinical and computed tomographic follow-up study of 104 patients. Stroke. 1988;19:192-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Lisk DR, Pasteur MD, Rhoades H, Putnam RD, Grotta JC. Early presentation of hemispheric intracerebral hemorrhage: Prediction of outcome and guidelines for treatment allocation. Neurology. 1994;44:133-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Bhatia RS, Garg RK, Gaur SP, Kar AM, Shukla R, Agarwal A, et al. Predictive value of routine hematological and biochemical parameters on 30-day fatality in in acute stroke. Neurol India. 2004;52:220-23.
12.
Dul K, Drayer B. CT and MR imaging of intracerebral hemorrhage. In: Kase CS, Caplan LR, eds. Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Boston, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1994;5:73-93. [crossref]
13.
Al-Mufti F, Thabet AM, Singh T, El-Ghanem M, Amuluru K, Gandhi CD. Clinical and radiographic predictors of intracerebral hemorrhage outcome. Intervent Neurol. 2018;7:118-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Ruiz-Sandoval JL, Chiquete E, Romero-Vargas S, Padilla-Martinez JJ, González-Cornejo S. Grading scale for prediction of outcome in primary intracerebral hemorrhages. Stroke. 2007;38:1641-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Fakiri MO, Uyttenboogaart M, Houben R, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Staals J, Luijckx GJ. Reliability of the intracerebral hemorrhage score for predicting outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage using oral anticoagulants. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27 (10):2006-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Cho DY, Chen CC, Lee HC, Lee WY, Lin HL. Glasgow Coma Scale and hematoma volume as criteria for treatment of putaminal and thalamic intracerebral hemorrhage. Surg Neurol. 2008;70 (6):628-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Kleinman JT, Hillis AE, Jordan LC. ABC/2: Estimating intracerebral haemorrhage volume and total brain volume, and predicting outcome in children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53 (3):281-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Sahni R, Weinberger J. Management of intracerebral hemorrhage. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3 (5):701-09.
19.
Bhatia R, Singh H, Singh S, Padma MV, Prasad K, Tripathi M, et al. A prospective study of in-hospital mortality and discharge outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurol India. 2013;61(3):244-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Togha M, Bakhtavar K. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality following intracerebral hemorrhage: A three-year study in Tehran, Iran. BMC Neurol. 2004;4:9. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Hegde A, Menon G, Kumar V, Lakshmi Prasad G, Kongwad LI, Nair R, et al. Clinical profile and predictors of outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage from a tertiary care centre in South India. Stroke Res Treat. 2020;2020:2192709. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Vitt JR, Sun CH, Le Roux PD, Hemphill JC 3rd. Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020;26(2):129-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Safatli DA, Günther A, Schlattmann P, Schwarz F, Kalff R, Ewald C. Predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with spontaneous primary intracerebral hemorrhage. Surgical Neurology International. 2016;7(Suppl 18):S510-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Luostarinen T, Satopaa J, Skrifvars MB, Reinikainen M, Bendel S, Curtze S, et al. Early surgery for superficial supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a Finnish Intensive Care Consortium study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162 (12):3153-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Prasad K, Mendelow AD, Gregson B. Surgery for primary supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):CD000200. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53246.16275

Date of Submission: Nov 10, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Dec 08, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Mar 23, 2022
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: No
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 13, 2021
• Manual Googling: Feb 24, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Mar 21, 2021 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com