Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 28645

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : April | Volume : 16 | Issue : 4 | Page : LC27 - LC34 Full Version

Double Jeopardy in Malaria Infected Children with Common Haemoglobinopathies: A Cross-sectional Study in Malaria Mesoendemic Districts of Ghana


Published: April 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52416.16218
Raymond Charles Ehiem, Bernard Walter L Lawson, John Asiedu Larbi

1. Medical Laboratory Scientist, St. Patrick’s Hospital, National Catholic Health Service, Offinso, Ashanti, Ghana; Graduate Student, Department of Theoretical and Applied Biology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Theoretical and Applied Biology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Theoretical and Applied Biology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

Correspondence Address :
Raymond Charles Ehiem,
Graduate Student, Department of Theoretical and Applied Biology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
E-mail: nanaehiem@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Malaria and conditions associated with common haemoglobinopathies constitute a health threat to young children in sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria is known to exert some influence on common haemoglobin variants while haemoglobinopathies also exacerbate malarial infection especially in children as a result of anaemia and other conditions.

Aim: To assess the views of parents/guardians on malaria and haemoglobinopathies and to determine the extent to which common haemoglobin variants influence malaria parasitaemia among children in the acute stage of the infection.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in seven districts in the forest zone of Ghana between June 2018 to July 2018 and involved 342 malaria-parasitaemic subjects aged 5 years and below. Questionnaires were administered to elicit responses on malaria prevention and sickle cell knowledge from the parents/guardians/caretakers accompanying the children to seek healthcare. Follow-up responses on medication and treatment outcome were collected during and after treatment. Venous blood samples were collected for malaria test, sickle cell investigations and identification of common haemoglobinopathies. After treatment, malaria tests were conducted using microscopy. The Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data between groups, and the Independent t-test used to compare means between groups.

Results: Out of total 342 subjects, 220 respondents (64.3%) identified fever as the most classical symptom of malaria, whilst 167 (48.8%) consistently used Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs). More so, 146 respondents (42.7%) strongly agreed that Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is a curse, and 182 respondents (53.2%) strongly agreed that SCD is inherited with 225 (65.8%) strongly agreeing that SCD children die before their teen ages. Common haemoglobin variants identified were Haemoglobin A and C bands (HbAC) 17 (5%), Normal Foetal Haemoglobin (HbAF) 7 (2%), Haemoglobin A and S bands (HbAS) 86 (25.1%), Haemoglobin S and C bands (HbSC) 4 (1.2%) and Haemoglobin S (homozygous) band (HbSS) 9 (2.6%). One month post-treatment, 10 (58.8%) of HbAC subjects, all 9 (100%) of HbSS and all 4 (100%) of HbSC subjects were still parasitaemic but with significantly low mean parasite density (495±1744).

Conclusion: Knowledge on malaria among the parents/guardians/caretakers was satisfactory, but usage of bed nets was poor, warranting the need for targeted health education of the rural folk. Though parasite densities had significant reductions, all subjects with HbSC and HbSS phenotypes remained parasitaemic after 4 weeks of treatment, suggesting a double jeopardy for individuals with SCD. Routine newborn screening in all healthcare facilities in Ghana could be a proactive step in malaria case management.

Keywords

Anaemia, New born screening, Parasite density, Plasmodium, Sickle cell disease

In 2018, 228 million people across the globe were diagnosed with malaria, with Africa getting a 93% allocation at a time malaria’s global mortality stood at 4,05,000 (1). Children, especially those 5 years of age and below, bear the greatest burden of the disease (2). Malaria poses a serious threat to the health of young children and so does Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) and other haemoglobinopathies due to their prevalence in Africa (3); and because of their notoriety for increased mortalities, the prevalence had been placed somewhere between 50% and 90% (4).

In sickle cell haemoglobinopathy, there is a point mutation in the β-globin chain. This leads to the substitution of glutamic acid with valine at the sixth position of the peptide chain (5). Altogether, the haemoglobin variants, Hemoglobin S (HbS) (β6Glu?Val) and Hemoglobin C (HbC) (β6Glu?Lys) have carrier prevalence of up to 30% in some African countries south of the Sahara (6). Up to 3% of all children born annually on the African continent have SCD (3), while other haemoglobinopathies have global prevalence of 25-30% (7). Common abnormal structural globin variants in Ghana and West Africa are Haemoglobin A and C bands (HbAC), Haemoglobin A and S bands (HbAS), Haemoglobin S (homozygous) band (HbSS), Haemoglobin S and C bands (HbSC) (8).

In Ghana, malaria is hyperendemic in most regions, although there are areas that are mesoendemic and hypoendemic and malaria prevalence among infants is approximately 28% (6) and a 2% prevalence of sickle cell birth annually (9). Because in-depth sickle cell screening, to detect common haemoglobinopathies, is not a routine procedure in many healthcare facilities in Ghana, most children with the condition are not detected and as a result may probably die young (9). The implication is that the combination of malaria infection and sickle cell crisis could best be described as double jeopardy for young children. The present study, therefore, aimed to determine the extent to which common haemoglobin variants influence malaria parasitaemia in children in the acute stage of the infection. Also to measure haemoglobin and white cell levels, identify common structural haemoglobin variants and the malaria parasite species present and to determine the malaria parasite densities in study subjects. It also sought the views of parents/guardians on malaria preventive practices and perceptions surrounding malaria and sickle cell infections.

Material and Methods

The cross-sectional study was carried out in seven districts in the forest zone of Ghana between June 2018 and July 2018. The study sites were: Eastern Region (Holy Family Hospital, Nkawkaw in the Kwahu West Municipality, and Presbyterian Hospital, Donkorkrom in Kwahu Afram Plains North District); Central Region (St. Francis Xavier Hospital, Assin Fosu in Assin North Municipal); Ashanti Region (St. Patrick’s Hospital, Offinso in the Offinso Municipality, and Mankranso Government Hospital in Ahafo Ano South District); Bono East Region (Holy Family Hospital, Techiman in Techiman Municipal) and Volta Region (St. Anthony’s Hospital, Dzodze in Ketu North District). The study sites are shown in (Table/Fig 1) with more details in (Table/Fig 2).

Study area and zone: The study areas (Table/Fig 1) lie within the malaria mesoendemic zone of the tropical rainforest (10).

Ethical approval and consent: Approval (CHRPE/KNUST/KATH/AP/433/17) was obtained from the Committee on Human Research Publications and Ethics of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi and Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana, before the commencement of the study. Written permission to carry out the study was also obtained from the Administrators/Medical Directors of the respective health facilities. A team was also setup at each site mandated to explain the nature of the study to key hospital figures and staff followed by oral presentations at the Outpatient Departments (OPD) where the study aims, objectives as well as risks and benefits were explained (in the Akan and Eυe languages). Informed consent was obtained from the parent/guardian of each subject before commencement of the study. The data collected from subjects were coded and placed in a secured cabinet for confidentiality.

This study analysed human venous blood specimens, for malaria parasitaemia, common haemoglobinopathies and selected haematological parameters. Cluster probability sampling technique was used to enroll children who regularly reside in the districts of the study.

Sample size calculation: The total population of individuals in the study areas was 978,483 while the percentage of children aged 5 years and below was 13.8% (11). From a total population of 978,483 for the seven districts, 13.8% translated to 135,030. This was the total site population of the group targeted. By calculation using Slovin’s formula (12), the appropriate sample size was approximately 399.

According to Slovin’s formula,
n=N/(1+N×e2)
{where, n is the sample size; N is the population size; e is the significance level (0.05 for 95% confidence interval)}
N=135030 (i.e., 13.8% of 978483)
n=135030/1+135030×0.05×0.05
n=398.8
n˜399

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Subjects aged 5 years and below, subjects tests positive for malaria and willing to take health facility approved malaria regimen were included in the study. Malnourished children, healthy children, older children and those whose guardians refused to consent were excluded from the study.

Malaria prescreening test was conducted on 849 participants. After preliminary tests, 342 (40.3%) subjects were enrolled as they tested positive for malaria. Malaria post-treatment testing was also conducted.

Sample collection: Preinclusion venous blood samples were collected by trained phlebotomists in June 2018. After treatment of subjects, venous blood samples were again collected in July 2018. Data on the preinclusion collection is shown in (Table/Fig 3).

Unique codes generated on the questionnaire for each participant were used to label the malaria RDT kits and microscope slides. Study staff was taken through Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) before commencement of study at the respective sites. Venous blood samples were collected from 849 children who showed interest in the study out of which 342 met all the inclusion criteria at the seven selected malaria-endemic districts and municipalities. Pretreatment venous blood samples were taken from the participants before malaria chemotherapy. The facilities used the national treatment guideline for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria {Artesunate-Amodiaquine (AA)/Artemether-lumefantrine (AL)/Dhydroartemisinin-Piperaquine (DHAP) as the active ingredients}. Because cure was expected between 14 to 28 days following drug administration (13), second blood samples were collected from the 342 subjects on day 28. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for venipuncture developed by BD® Diagnostics (REF: CLSI H3-A6) were adhered to by trained phlebotomists. Venous blood sample from each subject was collected into a 4 mL tube prelaced with Ethylenediaminetetracetic Acid (EDTA) and transported to St. Patrick’s Hospital, Offinso for laboratory processing and analysis. Blood spots meant for molecular work (parasite identification) were analysed at the Parasitology Department of Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Legon, Accra.

Test Procedure

Rapid diagnostic testing: CareStartTM HRP-2/pan pLDH test kit was used to qualitatively detect parasites of Plasmodium species from the blood of subjects. This screening test, based on immunochromatographic technique, has both Histidine Rich Protein-2 (HRP-2) and parasite Lactate Dehydrogenase (pLDH) as antigens embedded in the cassette (14). The testing was carried out on the field and interpreted, as positive or negative, according to manufacturer’s instructions. Known malaria positive and negative blood samples, from previously validated and authenticated malaria positive and negative cases, were run alongside each test kit batch to serve as controls.

Malaria microscopy: Thick and thin blood smears were prepared on the same glass slide for each subject using the method described by Norgan AP et al., (15). Known malaria positive and negative blood samples were included with each stained batch to serve as controls. To further enhance testing quality, experienced microscopists confirmed all slides, both positive and negative.

Haematology analysis: The Complete Blood Count (CBC) analysis was performed with Mindray Auto Haematology Analyser, BC 5300 (Shenzhen Mindray Biomedical Electronics, PR China). The parameters of interest with regards to the study (haemoglobin levels and white blood cell counts) were culled out and filed for malaria parasite density estimation and statistical analysis.

Parasite density estimation: For each subject, white blood cell counts obtained from the complete blood cell count and the number of asexual forms of the parasite counted against 200 leucocytes were utilised. Parasite densities (parasite/μL of whole blood) were then calculated as follows: Parasite Density (PD)= (Number of parasites counted/WBC) × WBC count/ μL (16).

Sickle cell test: The sodium metabisulphite technique as described by Old J et al., was used to determine haemoglobin S in whole blood specimen (17). Positive samples were identified under the microscope as sickle-shaped red blood cells. Negative samples did not have the sickle shape but had the biconcave red blood cell shape intact.

Hb electrophoresis: The guideline suggested by Kotila TR (18) was used with modification. Migrations exhibited by the control samples were used to classify the samples into appropriate phenotypes as suggested by Adu P et al., (19).

Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) extraction: Filter papers (Whatman 903®, GE Healthcare Ltd., Cardiff, UK) were used to collect whole blood samples for DNA extraction. Venous blood samples of study subjects were blotted on the labelled filter papers, air-dried, placed singly in polyethylene envelopes and labelled again. The filter paper cards were stored with silica gels in a cool, dry, secured cabinet. DNA extraction was done on the dried filter paper blots collected from subjects. For each sample, 3 punches of 3 mm diameter each were used. The extractions were done using QIAmp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following manufacturer’s instruction.

PCR analysis: Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was done to determine the Plasmodium species as described by Fuehrer HP and Noedl H (20). The cycling conditions Nest 1 were 94°C for 3 minutes; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 1:40 minutes and 72°C for 1 minute; 72°C for 5 minutes. The cycling conditions Nest 2 were 94°C for 3 minutes; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 58°C for 1 minute and 72°C for 1 minute; 72°C for 5minutes. For the nest II, four separate reactions were prepared using the respective species-specific primers. These took care of the four most common species of malaria parasites involved in clinical malaria, namely, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium vivax.

Analysis of PCR product: The Nest II PCR products were run on a 2% agarose gel stained with Sybr safe dye, at 120 v for 45 minutes. The PCR products were then visualised under ultraviolet light transillumination. The results were photographed using a paranoid camera. Based on the bands shown, the species presence was determined.

Questionnaire Administration

Details of each participant such as age, gender and place of abode were collected on questionnaires which were administered after written voluntary consent for participation had been obtained. As a cross-section of the parents/caretakers was either illiterates or semi-illiterates, the local Akan/Eυe translations of the contents of the questionnaires were utilised for communication. The questions were made clear to each interviewee while the interviewer recorded the responses on the questionnaire. Those who could read and write completed the questionnaires themselves. The questionnaires were administered to determine the possibility of exposure to the malaria vector as well as the possibility of administration of any chemotherapeutic agents. Socio-demographics as well as the opinions of the parents/guardians were also collected and documented. Multiple choice and open-ended responses were sought and where relevant, Likert scale format (strongly agree, agree, not sure, disagree, strongly disagree) was adopted in questionnaire construction to measure attitudes and opinions about malaria and sickle cell. Telephone contacts of respondents were written down on each questionnaire for follow-up purposes as it also enabled respondents to provide well thought-through responses which would not have been possible in completely anonymous questionnaire (21).

Statistical Analysis

Data generated were stored in MS Excel and analysed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. Categorical data were expressed in numbers and percentages while continuous variables were expressed in means±SD. The Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data between groups while the Independent t-test was used to compare means between groups. For all comparisons, p-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

A total of 342 children took part in the study. Subjects’ age ranged from 0 to 60 months, with 193 males and 149 females.

(Table/Fig 4) shows that there was no statistically significant difference between the male and female subjects, making the two groups demographically similar. However, absolute figures consistently indicates that, in randomised sampling, more males than females had malaria across the study sites.

The data presented in (Table/Fig 5) shows that there were statistically significant demographic differences (p-value <0.001) between the male and female parents/guardians/caretakers in all parameters except occupation and marital status.

(Table/Fig 6) indicates that there was statistically significant difference (p<0.003) in the mean scores of knowledge on sickle cell deaths between the groups. On the contrary, both groups had similar knowledge levels in classical symptoms of malaria, cause of malaria, sickle cell inheritance and whether on not SCD was a curse.

(Table/Fig 7) displays the summary of diagnostic tests conducted on the subjects. A total of 342 subjects were parasitaemic by microscopy, whilst only 336 tested positive by Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT). Discordant microscopy-RDT results/speciation were subsequently confirmed and resolved by PCR.

Data presented in (Table/Fig 8) indicates that sickle cell had a prevalence of 28.9% across the study groups. Among the subjects with haemoglobinopathy, the sickle cell trait (HbAS) had the highest prevalence (25.1%) among the subjects and across the study areas.

(Table/Fig 9) shows that sickle cell positivity was most prevalent (26.3%) in the Offinso study area and least prevalence in the Dzodze study area (8.1%).

The data in (Table/Fig 10) depicts that there was a statistically significant difference (p-value=0.019) between the groups with Plasmodium falciparum monoinfection and those with mixed infection with regard to sickling status. Phenotypically, however, the groups were similar.

The data presented in (Table/Fig 11) shows that across the study sites, all subjects with the sickle cell trait (HbAS) were completely cured of malaria. On the other end of the spectrum, all subject with HbSS (9/9) and HbSS (4/4) were parasitaemic before and after treatment. Subjects with normal haemoglobin (HbAA) and those with HbAC were varied in treatment.

(Table/Fig 12) indicates that there were varying degrees of parasitaemia across the study districts with Offinso having the least absolute subject figure reduction (9/83). Nkawkaw had the most absolute subject figure reduction (1/44).

(Table/Fig 13) depicts that there was significant positive effect of chemotherapy on parasite clearance. The mean post-treatment leucocyte level (7.12±2.37) and parasite density (495±1744) were significantly lower than pretreatment levels in the group (p-value <0.001), whereas the mean haemoglobin level significantly (p-value <0.001) increased from 9.32±2.06 to 11.72±1.54.

Discussion

Malaria has devastating effects on health and development, with everyone in Ghana being at risk of the infection (22). The study areas fall within the endemic malarious zone (Table/Fig 1). Worst still, it had been opined that children with the co-morbidity of malaria and SCD in a malarious zone have poorer prognosis and clinical outcomes (23). The aims of the study were to assess the views of parents/guardians/caretakers on malaria and haemoglobinopathies and to determine the extent to which common haemoglobin variants influence malaria parasitaemia among children in the acute stage of the infection. With a parasitaemia prevalence of 40.3%, the turnout of 849 febrile children and their parents/guardians/caretakers was encouraging enough to achieve the overall aim of the study (Table/Fig 3). The responses were satisfactory for malaria knowledge as they cumulatively averaged 68.4% (Table/Fig 6). There were misconceptions, though, with regards to haemoglobinopathy-related questions. Subjects with SCD fared poorly in relation to malaria prognosis.

In the present study, among the infected children, there was male gender dominance (Table/Fig 4). The percentage of male subjects was 56.4 (n=193) relative to the female 43.6% (n=149). Other similar studies conducted among young children have, likewise, found male dominance among the study subjects (24),(25),(26). This could be due to the observation that the male gender is a significant predictor of malarial infection (27),(28).

It was observed that most of the respondents (parents/guardians/caretakers) were female (Table/Fig 6). Few male parents/guardians/caretakers accompanied their febrile infants to seek healthcare. Malik EM et al., and Dumbaugh M et al., have reported similar observations. This may be due to gender-linked, culturally-defined roles common in many settings (29),(30). A greater proportion (64.3%) of the guardians responded that fever was a classical symptom of malaria (Table/Fig 6). Headache was the second highest symptom known (17.3%) with joint pains being the least (0.6%). Infact fever is interchangeable with malaria among rural folks in Ghana (31). The present study corroborated findings in other studies on the frequency of fever and other subjective clinical symptoms in malariology (32), although fever was not a specific marker for malaria (33). Most of the males (85%) and females (58.1%) guardians strongly agreed that malaria was caused by a blood parasite (Table/Fig 6). However, 7.6% and 16.4% of the guardians respectively disagreed and strongly disagreed, that malaria was caused by a germ in the blood. However, this was lower than the 92.2% of respondents who knew that malaria was caused by mosquito in a study conducted by Owusu EDA et al., at the Kwahu Government Hospital, Eastern Ghana (34).

There are a lot of genetic polymorphisms that influence the structure and, by extension, the production of β- and α-chains of haemoglobin which are linked with protection from Plasmodium falciparum infection. The protection offered depends on the haemoglobinopathy in question, although it is greatest with respect to severe malaria and to some extent uncomplicated malaria (35). The prevalence of the sickle cell status in the present study was 28.9% (Table/Fig 8). This finding was in agreement with Aboagye S et al., who documented a prevalence range in between 10% and 40% for sub-Saharan Africa (36). Majority of the subjects in the present study had HbAA, 5% had HbAC, 2% had HbAF, 25.1% had HbAS, 1.2% had HbSC and 2.6% had HbSS phenotypes (Table/Fig 8). Authors reported phenotypes and not genotypes because of the shortcomings of alkaline cellulose acetate paper electrophoresis (19). The percentage haemoglobin phenotype findings from the present study agreed with another similar study (37). Altogether, subjects with SCD were 13 out of 342 (3.8%). Other sickle cell-positive subjects without SCD were 86 out of 342 (25.1%) (Table/Fig 11). Of the infected children, 243 out of 342 (71.1%) did not have the S haemoglobin. The low percentage of infection in subjects with SCD relative to those without SCD (25.1%) was tantamount to the observation by Okuonghae HO et al., which found that Plasmodium falciparum parasites were detected in 9% of subjects with SCD compared with those without SCD (29%) (38). Likewise, Aluoch JR in Kenya and Awotua-Efebo O et al., in Nigeria observed a lower prevalence among infants with SCD relative to those without SCD [39,40]. The conclusion is thus plausible that, from a mechanistic level, children with SCD may have a significant level of protection from malaria. It has also been noted that children who have the sickle cell trait are protected against malaria, probably because P. falciparum parasites fail to thrive in erythrocytes with HbS (41). It could be that P. falciparum parasite-infected red blood cells get removed, by default, during an immune response (42). It is therefore logical that when intracellular concentrations of HbS are raised, as pertains in the homozygous form, greater protection is envisaged. Such deduction is in line with studies that investigated the mechanism surrounding HbS in malaria protection (43).

The high concentration of foetal haemoglobin in the red cells of SCD infants is also opined to further confer malaria protection (43). This is further buttressed by the finding of about 30% of the subjects who had P. falciparum infection alone being sickling positive, and 5.3% of those with P. falciparum and P. ovale mixed-infection being sickling positive (Table/Fig 10). P. falciparum and P. ovale mixed-infection were confirmed by conventional PCR (Table/Fig 7). Approximately 26.6% with P. falciparum infection were AS, with 3.7% of subjects having SCD (1.2% SC and 2.5% SS) after HB electrophoresis. However, none of the subjects with P. falciparum and P. ovale mixed-infection in this study were AS or SC, with 5.3% being SS. This could suggest that abnormal haemoglobin variant heterozygosity may not favour mixed malaria species infection. Species-wise, it is not uncommon to encounter P. falciparum and P. ovale as the only species among the Ghanaian populace in the forest zone (44).

The present study also found that after treatment, 10/226 (4.4%) of the HbAA subjects and 10/17 (58.8%) HbAC subjects were still parasitaemic (Table/Fig 11) agreeing with a study of 1070 children from Afigya Sekyere District of Ashanti Region, Ghana, which found that subjects with HbAA and HbAC do not differ in their protection against malaria (45), although other studies observed that the AC genotype fared better than do the AA genotypes with regards to malaria infectivity (8). All the HbSS (9/9) and all the HbSC (4/4) subjects in the study remained positive after treatment, suggesting a double jeopardy for HbSC and HbSS haemoglobin variants (Table/Fig 11), even though parasite densities were very significantly reduced (495±1744, p-value <0.001). They may have to be re-treated. Cure for malaria was expected between day 14 and day 28 following chemotherapy with nationally approved regimens (13).

However, the continued microscopy-confirmed parasitaemia 28 days post-treatment (Table/Fig 12) may be a pointer to dosage non adherence, incomplete treatment, treatment failure, re-infection, relapse or recrudescence. Authors also suggested that, per our study, it could be due to HbSS/HbSC haemoglobinopathies. To the best of our knowledge, there is no similar local longitudinal study to affirm or discount the HbSS/HbSC findings per post-treatment. Of the 86 HbAS subjects, none was positive after treatment (Table/Fig 11), agreeing with another similar study which showed that individuals with this haemoglobin variant fared better than the others (46). Moreover, the finding of a significantly (p-value <0.001) reduced parasite density after treatment with 309 (90.4%) of subjects having no malaria parasites in peripheral blood (Table/Fig 13) indicated that the treatment given was effective in clearing the parasites.

The higher prevalence of HbSS than HbSC (Table/Fig 8) was comparable to the findings by Asare E et al., who reported a 55.7% HbSS relative to 39.6% HbSC among SCD patients presenting at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana (47). Ohene-Frempong K et al., also found that 55% of children born with SCD in Ghana were homozygous (HbSS) (48). Among the subjects positive for sickling, most (26.3%) were from Offinso followed by Donkorkrom, Nkawkaw, Techiman, Assin Fosu, Mankranso and Dzodze in descending order (Table/Fig 9). The reasons for the high sickling prevalence for Offinso may be varied; it could be due to the district’s large contribution of study participants. It could also be due to other reasons yet to be determined. A call, therefore, for a paradigm shift and a policy geared towards universal newborn sickle cell screening in all healthcare points would be effective in curtailing the drastic effects of this and other haemoglobinopathies (49).

Approximately, 43% and 4% of the guardians, respectively, strongly agreed and agreed that SCD was a curse (Table/Fig 6). Contrastingly, only 4.3% of respondents responded that SCD was a curse in the study by Owusu EDA et al., (34). Majority (57.3%) however knew that SCD was inherited while 37.1% disagreed that it was inherited. Also, 65.8% strongly agreed that children with SCD died before they got to their teen ages, an observation that agreed with another similar study (50). Evidence abounds now, however, that there is reduced mortality, improved survival rate and longevity for SCD patients (51).

From the present study, there was a demonstration of anaemia (Hb <12 g/dL) in 89.5% of the infants before treatment (Table/Fig 13).

This was consistent with the study by Sakzabre D et al., and Bawah AT et al., who had similar findings which they attributed to malaria parasitaemia resulting from factors such as destruction of infected erythrocytes and the increased clearance of both parasitised and non parasitised erythrocytes, an observation further supported by the finding of a significantly elevated mean haemoglobin level (p-value <0.001, 11.72±1.54) after treatment of the infection (51),(52).

Limitation(s)

The study has limitation in the analytical method used for identification of common haemoglobinopathies. In the absence of High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and genetic testing techniques, some variant haemoglobins and thalassaemias could not be identified. However, alkaline cellulose acetate electrophoresis was able to identify most of the main haemoglobinopathies common to individuals in the West African sub-region, strengthening the findings and deductions here in.

Conclusion

It was observed that most of the parasitised subjects had normal haemoglobin, and that about a third were sickling positive, suggesting some malaria protection for subjects with sickle cell haemoglobinopathy. None of the subjects with P. falciparum and P. ovale mixed-infection were HbAS and HbSC, with the assumption that abnormal structural globin variant heterozygosity may not favour mixed malaria species infection. After treatment, it was found that subjects with normal haemoglobin phenotypes as well as those with the sickle cell trait were cured of malaria. The study determined that subjects with HbSC and HbSS phenotypes remained parasitaemic after 4 weeks of treatment, suggesting a double jeopardy for individuals with SCD. It was also found that misconceptions about SCD still existed among the rural folk, necessitating regular health education.

Although the knowledge of parents/guardians/caretakers on malaria was satisfactory, there is the need for further targeted health education in order to ensure timely reporting of cases to health facilities and to erase deep-seated perceptions on malaria and haemoglobinopathies. Authors also recommend that it is time routine newborn screening was made mandatory in all healthcare facilities in Ghana.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the administrators of the selected hospitals and extend their heartfelt appreciation to the staff as well as all participants for their cooperation and willingness to see to the success of the study. The contributions of the staff of the Medical Laboratory Departments of the selected health facilities are much appreciated. Authors also express their profound gratitude to all research assistants and to Ms. Emelia Kyei Mensah, the nurse who visited all the seven sites collecting data from participants and following up on the prognosis of the sick children. The authors also appreciate the efforts of Ms. Millicent Opoku, Dr. Jewelna EB Akorli, Dr. Charles Quaye and the staff of the Parasitology Department, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Legon, Accra, for their supportive role during the molecular aspect of the study. Authors are obliged to the contributions of Mr. Hope Agbodzakey for the data analysis, suggestions and support.

References

1.
World Health Organisation. Malaria: About the WHO global malaria programme. World Health Organisation, Geneva, 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/malaria/about _us/en/, Accessed 25 September, 2019.
2.
World Health Organisation. Malaria in children under five. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2018a. Available at: http://www.who.int/malaria/areas/high_risk_groups/children/en/. Accessed 22 December, 2018.
3.
Grosse SD, Odame I, Atrash H, Amendah D, Piel F, Williams T. Sickle cell disease in Africa: A neglected cause of early child mortality. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2011;41(6 Suppl 4):S398-405. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Williams T, Obaro S. Sickle cell disease and malaria morbidity: A tale with two tails. Trends Parasitol. 2011;27(7):315-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Steinberg M. Genetic etiologies for phenotypic diversity in sickle cell anemia. Sci World Journal. 2009;9:46-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Flint J, Harding RM, Boyce AJ, Clegg JB. The population genetics of the haemoglobinopathies. Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1998;11(1):01-51. [crossref]
7.
Bernadette M, Matthew D. Global epidemiology of haemoglobin disorders and derived service indicators. Bulletin of World Health Organisation. 2008;6:480-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Bougouma EC, Tiono AB, Ouedraogo A, Soulama I, Diarra A, Yaro JB, et al. Haemoglobin variants and Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children under five years of age living in a high and seasonal malaria transmission area of Burkina Faso. Malaria Journal. 2012;11:154. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Ohene-Frempong K. Sickle Cell Disease Services in Ghana; Presentation to the Joint WHO and TIF Meeting on Haemoglobin Disorders, Hilton Park Hotel, Nicosia, Cyprus, 16-18 November 2007.
10.
Williams O, Meek S, Abeku T, Baba E, Brownlow K, Chilundo B, et al. Malaria: Country Profiles. Version1.1, 2011. Department for International Development (DFID), London, U.K.
11.
Ghana Statistical Service, GSS. 2010 Population and Housing Census. Final Results, 2012. Ghana Statistical Service, Accra, Ghana, 7-8.
12.
Ryan TP. Sample Size Determination and Power. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2013. [crossref]
13.
Greenwood B. Treating malaria in Africa. BMJ. 2004;328(7439):534-35. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.534. PMID: 15001479; PMCID: PMC381032. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
McNeil P. Diagnostic performance of CareStart malaria HRP2/PLDH. Clinical Microb Rev. 2008;21:97-110.
15.
Norgan AP, Arguello HE, Sloan LM, Fernholz EC, Pritt BS. A method for reducing the sloughing of thick blood films for malaria diagnosis. Malaria Journal. 2013;12(1):231. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-231. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
World Health Organisation. Routine examination of blood films for malaria parasites. In: Basic Malaria Microscopy, Learner’s guide. WHO, Switzerland, Geneva. 2010; Pp. 69-76.
17.
Old J, Harteveld CL, Traeger-Synodinos J, Petrou M, Angastiniotis M, Galanello R. Prevention of thalassaemias and other haemoglobin disorders. Vol. 2: Laboratory Protocols. 2nd Ed. Thalassaemia International Federation, Nicosia, 2012.
18.
Kotila TR. Guidelines for the diagnosis of haemoglobinopathies in Nigeria. Annals of Ibadan Postgraduate Medicine. 2010;8(1):25-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Adu P, Simpong NL, Kontor K, Ephraim RKD. Misleading presentation of haemoglobin electrophoresis data. Ghana Med J. 2017;51(1):36-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Fuehrer HP, Noedl H. Recent advances in detection of Plasmodium ovale: Implications of separation into the two species Plasmodium ovale wallikeri and Plasmodium ovale curtisi. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(2):387-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Paulhus DL. Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1984;46(3):598. [crossref]
22.
World Health Organisation. World malaria Report. World Health Organisation, Geneva; 2018.
23.
Weatherall MW, Higgs DR, Weiss H, Weatherall DJ, Serjeant GR. Phenotype/genotype relationships in sickle cell disease: A pilot twin study. Clin Lab Haematol. 2005;27(6):384-90. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Nyarko SH, Cobblah A. Socio-demographic determinants of malaria among underfive children in Ghana. Malaria Research and Treatment. 2014;2014:304361. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/304361. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Scarcella P, Moramarco S, Buonomo E, Nielsen-Saines K, Jere H, Guidotti G, et al. The Impact of malaria on child growth: anthropometric outcomes in a pediatric HIV-exposed cohort in Malawi. Biomedicine & Prevention. 2016;1(53):28-33.
26.
Yankson R, Anto EA, Chipeta MG. Geostatistical analysis and mapping of malaria risk in children under 5 using point.referenced prevalence data in Ghana. Malaria Journal. 2019;18:67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2709-y. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Afoakwah C, Deng X, Onur I. Malaria infection among children under five: The use of large-scale interventions in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:536. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Ronald L, Kenny S, Klinkenberg E, Akoto A, Boakye I, Barnish G, et al. Malaria and anaemia among children in two communities of Kumasi, Ghana: A crosssectional survey. Malaria Journal. 2006;5(1):105. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Malik EM, Hanafi K, Ali SH, Ahmed ES, Mohamed KA. Treatment-seeking behaviour for malaria in children under five years of age: implication for home management in rural areas with high seasonal transmission in Sudan. Malaria Journal. 2006;5:60. Doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Dumbaugh M, Tawiah-Agyemang C, Manu A, ten Asbroek GHA, Kirkwood B, Hill Z. Perceptions of, attitudes towards and barriers to male involvement in newborn care in rural Ghana, West Africa: A qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14:269. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-269. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Ahorlu CK, Dunyo SK, Afari EA, Koram KA, Nkrumah FK. Malaria-related beliefs and behaviour in southern Ghana: Implications for treatment, prevention and control. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 1997;2(5):488-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Nonvignon J, Aikins MK, Chinbuah MA, Abbey M, Gyapong M, Garshong BN. Treatment choices for fevers in children under five years in a rural Ghanaian district. Malaria Journal. 2010;9:188. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Afrane Y, Zhou G, Githeko A, Yan G. Clinical malaria case definition and malaria attributable fraction in the highlands of western Kenya. Malaria Journal. 2014;13:405. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Owusu EDA, Nana S, Nai E, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Brown CA, Mens P, et al. Malaria, sickle cell disease, HIV and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis: An observational study. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2018;69:29-34. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Taylor SM, Parobek CM, Fairhurst RM. Impact of haemoglobinopathies on the clinical epidemiology of malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(6):457-68. [crossref]
36.
Aboagye S, Torto M, Asah-Opoku K, Nuamah MA, Oppong SA, Samba A. Sickle cell education: A survey of antenatal healthcare givers. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;101(3):684-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Awaitey DK, Akorsu EE, Allotey EA, Kwasie DA, Kwadzokpui PK, Tawiah PA, et al. Assessment of haemoglobin variants in patients receiving healthcare at the Ho Teaching Hospital: A three-year retrospective study. Advances in Haematology. 2020;2020:7369731. 6 pages. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Okuonghae HO, Nwankwo MU, Offor E. Malarial parasitaemia in febrile children with sickle cell anaemia. J Trop Pediatr. 1992;38:83-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Aluoch JR. Higher resistance to Plasmodium falciparum infection in patients with homozygous sickle cell disease in western Kenya. Trop Med Int Health. 1997;2:568-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Awotua-Efebo O, Alikor EA, Nkanginieme KE. Malaria parasite density and splenic status by ultrasonography in stable sickle-cell anaemia (HbSS) children. Niger J Med. 2004;13:40-43.
41.
Aidoo M, Terlouw DJ, Kolczak MS. Protective effects of the sickle cell gene against malaria morbidity and mortality. Lancet. 2002;359:1311-12. [crossref]
42.
Williams TN, Mwangi TW, Wambua S. Sickle cell trait and the risk of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and other childhood diseases. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:178-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Cholera R, Brittain NJ, Gillie MR. Impaired cytoadherence of Plasmodium falciparum infected erythrocytes containing sickle hemoglobin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:991-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
44.
Browne E, Frimpong E, Sievertsen J, Hagen J. Malariometric update for the rainforest and savanna of Ashanti Region, Ghana. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2000;94:15-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
45.
Kreuels B, Kreuzberg C, Kobbe R, Ayim-Akonor M, Apiah-Thompson P, Thompson B, et al. Differing effects of HbS and HbC traits on uncomplicated falciparum malaria, anemia, and child growth. Blood. 2010;115(22):4551-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
46.
Mockenhaupt FP, Ehrhardt S, Cramer JP, Otchwemah RN, Anemana SD, Goltz K, et al. Haemoglobin C and resistance to severe malaria in Ghanaian children. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:1006-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
47.
Asare E, Wilson I, Benneh-Akwasi A, Dei-Adomakoh Y, Sey F, Olayemi E. Burden of sickle cell disease in Ghana: The korle-bu experience. Advances in Hematology. 2018;2018:6161270. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6161270. [crossref] [PubMed]
48.
Ohene-Frempong K, Oduro J, Tetteh H, Nkrumah F. Screening newborns for sickle cell disease in Ghana. Pediatrics. 2008;121:S120-21. [crossref]
49.
Galadanci N, Wudil B, Balogun T. Current sickle cell disease management practices in Nigeria. International Health. 2014;6(1):23-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
50.
Wastnedge E, Patel S, Goh M, Rudan I. The global burden of sickle cell disease in children under five years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2018;8:021103. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Sakzabre D, Asiamah EA, Akorsu EE, Abaka-Yawson A, Dika ND, Kwasie DA, et al. Haematological profile of adults with malaria parasitaemia visiting the volta regional hospital, Ghana. Advances in Hematology. 2020;2020:9369758. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Bawah AT, Nyakpo KT, Ussher FA, Alidu HW, Dzogbo JJ, Agbemenya S, et al. Hematological profile of children under five years with malaria at the Ho municipality of Ghana. Edorium Journal of Pediatrics. 2018;2:100004P05AB2018.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52416.16218

Date of Submission: Sep 15, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 19, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 21, 2022
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 16, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 14, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jan 27, 2022 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com