Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 29228

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : November | Volume : 16 | Issue : 11 | Page : ZF06 - ZF11 Full Version

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Dental Practice: A Questionnaire Survey


Published: November 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56871.17107
Shivani Kondhalkar, Daisy Happy

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Periodontology, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Periodontology, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India; PhD Fellow, D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shivani Kondhalkar,
Shri Samartha Krupa Bunglow, Godavari Nagar, T.C College Road, Baramati,
Pune-413102, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: shivanikondhalkar9996@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had unprecedented health and economic consequences. Dentists encounter maximum aerosol production due to frequent use of ultrasonic and polishing devices or other surgical interventions, thus increasing the risk of nosocomial infections. The situation had caused drastic change in the clinical routines including modifications in infection control strategies, managing of minimally invasive procedures, reducing the patient visits and updating themselves to use telecommunication to cater to the need of patients.

Aim: To evaluate the consequences and impact of COVID-19 pandemic by conducting an online survey using questionnaire amongst dentists as healthcare providers in the country of India.

Materials and Methods: This was a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey conducted using online platform in India with a sample size of 225 participants, who were practicing dentists, either graduates or postgraduates, and agreed to give an informed consent. The questionnaire consisted of six segments: participants demographics, changes in clinical routine of the respective dentist, upgrading facilities in clinic, infection control measures, telecommunication and impact on financial aspect of the practitioner. Open-ended questions were also included giving an opportunity to the participant to share his or her perspective. Chi-square test of proportion was performed to assess the difference in proportion of the responses. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The present study has shown that the pandemic has impacted negatively on financial status, patient flow and daily practice. Total 221 (98.2%) clinicians agree to the fact that, COVID-19 has affected their clinical routine, 203 (90.2%) clinician were aware of the aerosol generating procedures and 95 (42.2%) practitioners have installed devices for air purification. A 209 (92.8%) emphasise on the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) kits and majority 84 (37.3%) were delaying elective procedures. About 184 (81.7%) have experienced decrease in number of patient flow and 104 (46.2%) practitioners agreed that their emotional and psychological well-being is affected due to drastic changes made in their practicing protocols due to COVID-19.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the social, economic, physical as well as mental well-being of practioners all around the world. More or less the practice is hampered causing frustration and instability. Focusing the light on practicing dentists, they have seen to make significant changes in their zone of practice and have updated to the new normal version of practice.

Keywords

Aerosols, Coronavirus disease 2019, Dental health professionals

The latest threat to global health was the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) (1). According to World Health Organisation (WHO), coronaviruses are known as a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) (2). The COVID-19, has strangulated the world by spreading its tentacles in all spheres of life, initiated as a pneumonia outbreak in Wuhan, China. Various studies have reported that human coronaviruses can remain viable on various inanimate surfaces from two hours to upto nine days (3).

The spread of COVID-19 posed significant challenges for all healthcare professionals in the affected countries. Like-wise it has also affected the healthcare providers and dental practitioners. dental professionals are at the front line of healthcare, working in the oral cavity, with a potentially increased viral exposure (3). As per Occupational Safety and Health Administration agency (United States of America), all dental healthcare professionals are categorised to be most vulnerable to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure. This is primarily due to face-to-face contact, nature of treatment causing high-risk of contamination and infection as well (4).

Dentists also encounter maximum aerosol production due to frequent use of ultrasonic and polishing devices or other surgical interventions, simultaneously increasing the risk of nosocomial infections (5). The situation has caused drastic change in the clinical routines including modifications in infection control strategies, managing of minimally invasive procedures, controlling of aerosol generation, reducing the patient visits and updating themselves to consult patients via telecommunication devices, managing financial aspects (4),(6).

The present questionnaire study attempts to evaluate the overall impact caused on the clinical routine of dentists. Although, there are a few studies done previously to understand the dental practitioners’ mindset and awareness regarding the pandemic but very few studies attempted to understand the overall impact caused by COVID-19 pandemic on practitioners in developing countries like India (4),(5). There was an imparity in terms of effect of pandemic between different countries. This is a fact that developed, developing and under developed countries have reacted dissimilarly to the pandemic situation (5). Hence, the present survey was designed to evaluate and understand the impact on clinical practice, financial aspects and alterations clinicians had to make, to cope up with the situation in India.

The study thus, aims to evaluate the consequences and impact of COVID-19 pandemic by conducting an online survey using questionnaire amongst dentists as healthcare providers.

Material and Methods

This was a questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey conducted using online platform in India for the duration of three months from October 2021 to December 2021. It was approved by the scientific ethical committee. The questionnaire had an informed consent and the link to its access was circulated through different social media platforms (WhatsApp, Instagram, Telegram). A convenience sampling technique was used considering all the questionnaire answered within three months by clinicians who met the inclusion criteria of the study.

Inclusion criteria: All practicing dentists (graduates or postgraduates) who agreed to participate in the questionnaire survey by checking the box related to informed consent were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Dentists who ceased their professional activities more than one year ago, who did not complete the survey or did not agree to provide their informed consent were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: A total sample size of 225 participants were included in the study. Sample size was calculated using OpenEpi software. At 5% confidence limit (95% confidence interval) with 82.7% hypothesis percentage frequency of outcome factor in the population from previous literature (7), the sample size estimated was 220. The formula used for sample size estimation was:

n=[DEFF*Np(1-p)]/[(d2/Z21-α/2*(N-1)+p*(1-p)]

Where, DEFF (Design Effect=1),
p (proportion)=0.827) and
d (confidence limit=5%)

Questionnaire

The questionnaire for the survey was framed by authors and was validated before use. The questionnaire was divided into six domains.

First domain: Demographics of participants.
Second domain: Changes in clinical routine of the respective dentist.
Third domain: Upgrading facilities in clinic.
Fourth domain: Infection control measures.
Fifth domain: Questions regarding telecommunication.
Sixth domain: Financial aspect of the practitioner.

The survey was a structured

• Multiple-choice questionnaire with seven questions having multiple select and 13 questions having single select.
• Apart from this, six open-ended questions were also included giving an opportunity to the participant to share their perspective.

Likert scale was used to evaluate the psychological well-being of the practicing dentists. It was a self-designed questionnaire administered in English language. Google forms platform was used to generate the layout of the questions.

The face validation of the questionnaire instrument was determined using Cohen’s kappa index on collected data. The kappa index value was 0.7 for inter-rater agreement in the questionnaire. Internal consistency refers to the extent to which all of the items in a scale measure the different aspects of the same attribute. Cronbach’s alpha was determined to assess the internal consistency and the alpha value for the overall questionnaire was 0.90. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated for test-retest reliability on the scores of the participants, who completed the questionnaire twice. The overall reliability was high (r-value=0.80, p-value <0.001).

Statistical Analysis

The data was arranged in an Excel sheet. For all the multiple-choice questions, the frequency of each response for every question was calculated. For open-ended questions, different responses were tabulated and qualitatively analysed. The demographic data of participants was also analysed. Chi-square test of proportion was performed to assess the difference in proportion of the responses. The significance level was set at 95% and p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Data from 225 practicing dentists was collected and analysed. (Table/Fig 1) summarises the participant demographics.

The second domain included changes made by practitioners in their clinical routine. Practitioners have written responses about modifications made in their working environment. Some of them have placed glass shields, applied barriers to maintain social distancing, placed charts and posters to educate patients regarding sneezing, coughing and sanitisation protocols. (Table/Fig 2) shows the details regarding changes made in clinic routine. Total 152 (67.5%) practitioners, made all of the mentioned changes in their clinical routine (p-value <0.001).

(Table/Fig 3) shows further questions included in the questionnaire regarding the upgrading of facilities in the clinic to subside the production and spread of COVID-19 infection. Amongst all the respondents, 95 (42.2%) dentists have installed devices in the clinic and different practitioners have opted for equipment according to their convenience (p-value=0.253). None of the participant suggested any equipment for air purification in open-ended question.

(Table/Fig 4) shows all the detailed responses regarding the infection control. Practitioners have stated in the open-ended question that they have instructed their receptionists to tell patients to sanitise their hands before entering the clinic. And also, the most preferred device was the hand sanitiser dispenser opted by 203 (90.2%) participants (p-value <0.001). Practitioners have made modification in their working environment like placing glass shields, application of barriers to maintain social distancing, placing of charts and posters to educate patients regarding sneezing, coughing and sanitisation protocols as answered in the open-ended slot.

The next questions in the questionnaire were about telecommunication. The most preferred telecommunication opted by many practitioners is telephone call 173 (76.8%) (p-value <0.001). None of the participant mentioned procedural changes in your practice in open-ended slot. (Table/Fig 5) shows the modes of communication opted by practitioners and the type of services provided by them to the patients.

The services provided by dentists via telecommunication included scheduling appointments to their patients along with palliative care. Symptomatic treatment is provided by about 152 (67.5%) practitioners so as to relieve pain or discomfort in their patients. Around 37 (16.4%) respondents opt discussing treatment plan with their patients via telecommunication (p-value=0.015). None of the participant mentioned procedural changes in your practice in open-ended slot.

The next and last domain in the questionnaire was regarding financial aspect of the practitioners. It has affected the income source in various manners presented in following (Table/Fig 6). There was no other reason stated in the open-ended section regarding any other causes affecting the economy of the individual. Out of total, 49 (21.7%) were not in favour of increasing the cost (p-value <0.001), reason as stated in the open-ended slot being that common people were already in stress and facing various challenges in their day-to-day living. Majority of practitioners agree to the fact that the ongoing pandemic has affected their psychological well-being negatively (p-value=0.042).

An open-ended question regarding impact of pandemic on the physical, mental and emotional well-being of the clinicians was asked in the questionnaire. Dentists have put up their various opinions in this section. Amongst the respondents the new and young generation with fresh knowledge mention that there is lack of exposure to the clinical practice which is a noteworthy point. They also mention lack of confidence, finding less opportunities and were emotionally drained. Practicing dentists also mention increase in stress levels, non productivity, decreased peace of mind, depression and facing work related anxiety. The increased stress levels have also caused an effect on sleep cycles, increased frustration and confusion. Life seems to be monotonous and dull than before for many practitioners.

Apart from the negative responses from the dentists some of the practitioners also had a positive perspective about the pandemic. Participants gave an opinion that they were getting time to focus on themselves. Some mention practicing exercise, yoga and meditation keeping themselves more physically and mentally fit. Practitioners had got a chance to enhance themselves in other leisure activities and have got a chance to segregate between their priorities and materialistic things. The other possible positive impact of COVID-19 pandemic is the rise in international and national interactions. Virtual backgrounds of the conferences have increased the chances of sharing knowledge and newer techniques by conducting online programs for the new practitioners.

Discussion

This study has shown that the pandemic has impacted negatively on financial status, patient flow and daily practice. The questionnaire study has accomplished the goal of understanding the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the dental practice. The dentists who participated in the survey have given their respective opinions about the changes caused in their clinical routine. About 221 (98.2%) clinicians agreed to the fact that COVID-19 has affected their clinical routine. Dentists emphasise on following various disinfectant measures and have increased the use of PPE simultaneously. Out of total, 36 (16%) of them vote in favour of reducing the number of patient visits and have switched to updating themselves to using telecommunication devices to communicate with patients. About 152 (67.5%) practicing dentists have made all the mentioned changes in their clinical routine. Various guidelines were issued which were supposed to be followed by all the practicing dentists so as to avoid the further spread of infection and about 222 (98.6%) participants have claimed to follow the guidelines issued by Dental Council of India (DCI) and Indian Dental Association (IDA), which shows the high percentage of awareness amongst the practitioners.

Infection control is another important aspect in the maintenance of sanitisation. Total 90.2% practitioners have placed hand sanitiser dispensers outside the clinic, so that patients and visitors can apply the sanitiser before entering the clinic. In the present study, 90.2% of the clinicians were aware of aerosol production during various dental procedures. Aerosol production proves to be an important aspect as it can be the potential cause of infection in the clinic. A trial conducted by Mohan M and Jagannathan N in 2016 showed that Colony Forming Units (CFUs) decreased in patents, who had a pre-rinse with chlorhexidine mouthwash when compared to patients with saline mouth rinse (6). A recent German study had stated that longer the COVID-19 crisis continues, the more will be the financial distress in dental practice (7).

Various changes made in the clinic like incorporation of devices necessary to maintain sanitisation and avoid risk of infection are mentioned. Four categories of transmission routes have been proposed: (a) symptomatic transmission; (b) pre-symptomatic transmission; (c) asymptomatic transmission; (d) environmental transmission. There is current evidence that most transmission occurs from symptomatic people to others not wearing PPE and in close contact (8). But this in return has also caused significant rise in the treatment costs. According to a survey conducted by the Irish Dental Association about the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on dental practices, it was found that around 20% of dental care providers have closed their practices for a limited time or permanently (9). Meng L et al., reported nine cases of COVID-19 among 169 dental practitioners, thus emphasising the high-risk of professional contagiousness (10).

Apart from all these aspects the practitioners have acclimatised themselves to using telecommunication devices to avoid unnecessary gathering and exposure increasing the risk of infection. In an article “COVID-19: Changing Trends and Its Impact on Future of Dentistry” by Bhanushali P et al., more attention is given to changing trends like for example teledentistry (11). Teleconsultation provides the practitioners with contact-less consultation. It not only eliminates any chance of exposure to the virus but also decreases the service cost and helps in patient education (12). Telescreening and teledentistry could be promoted (13). But even if this fact is true, teledentistry does have limitations when it comes to dental practice. Emergency treatments cannot be done without physical presence of the dentist unlike other medical professionals.

Dentists being healthcare providers should keep themselves updated for the further challenges similar to the ongoing pandemic. This will avoid the sudden necessity of changes to be made in the future practice. Ultimately it will only ensure improvement in self-care measures and avoid spread of infection (14). Dentists should first prioritise their health rather than financial aspect. The results of the present study are compared and discussed with related studies in (Table/Fig 7) (7),(8),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21).

Limitation(s)

Despite the relevance of findings in the study, some limitations need to be highlighted. As this was an observational study, based on a questionnaire, conclusions drawn were dependent on responses of the participants and there was no way to assess the authenticity of the responses. Other limitation of the study was the participants interest in responding to the questionnaire. Response rate for open-ended questions were comparatively low. In future, study targeting specific areas (like urban or rural) or specific population (like Institution or private practice) with more sample size can be conducted as there can be disparity between the effect of COVID- 19 on different group of clinicians. Thus, a multicentric study with a multiphase sampling can be designed in future.

Conclusion

The survey has shown that the pandemic has impacted negatively on financial status, patient flow and daily practice. Focusing the light on practicing dentists, they had to make significant changes in their zone of practice and had updated to the new normal version of practice like paying additional attention on sanitisation, selfcare measures and modifying clinical setups with purification devices. Teledentistry is an upcoming concept which all should acclimatise to. It enables the interaction with patients and providing healthcare advices but to a minimal extent. Every outbreak provides an opportunity to gain knowledge and also, access to new window of opportunities. Thus, the emerging concept of new normal shall be accepted.

Acknowledgement

The authors received no financial support and declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of the present article. The authors, thank Dr. Vineet Vinay for contributing to the formulation, design of study and data acquisition and Mr. Saurabh Galinde for providing technical support in the development of the study. All authors gave their final approval and have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

References

1.
Fong SJ, Dey N, Chaki J. Artificial Intelligence for Coronavirus Outbreak. Singapore: Springer Publication; 2020.1-22. Chapter 1, An introduction to COVID-19. [crossref]
2.
World Health Organisation. 2019, Available at: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/ health-topics/detail/coronavirus. Accessed on 16 July, 2022.
3.
Kochhar AS, Bhasin R, Kochhar GK, Dadlani H. COVID-19 pandemic and dental practice. Int J Dent. 2020;2020:8894794. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Campus G, Betancourt MD, Cagetti MG, Giacaman RA, Manton DJ, Douglas GV, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and its global effects on dental practice. J Dent. 2021;114:103749. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Sarate S, Pawar BR, Salavadi SS, Sarate K, Dubey YK, Wankhede TD, et al. Awareness and attitude of dental professionals towards pandemic outbreak of covid-19 in central India-A questionnaire study. IP Int J Periodontol Implantol. 2020;5(3):124-28. [crossref]
6.
Mohan M, Jagannathan N. The efficacy of pre-procedural mouth rinse on bacterial count in dental aerosol following oral prophylaxis. Dent Med Probl. 2016;53(1):78-82. [crossref]
7.
Rocha-Gomes G, Flecha OD, Miranda TS, Duarte PM, Shaddox LM, Galvão EL, et al. Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on periodontal practice: A questionnaire survey. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2021;48(4):541-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Nibali L, Ide M, Ng D, Buontempo Z, Clayton Y, Asimakopoulou K, et al. The perceived impact of Covid-19 on periodontal practice in the United Kingdom: A questionnaire study. J Dent. 2020;102:103481. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Ali S, Farooq I, Abdelsalam M, AlHumaid J. Current clinical dental practice guidelines and the financial impact of COVID-19 on dental care providers. Eur J Dent. 2020.14(S 01):S140-S145. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. J Dent Res. 2020;99(5):481-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Bhanushali P, Katge F, Deshpande S, Chimata VK, Shetty S, Pradhan D, et al. COVID-19: Changing trends and its impact on future of dentistry. Int J Dent. 2020;2020:8817424. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Izzetti R, Nisi M, Gabriele M, Graziani F. COVID-19 transmission in dental practice: Brief review of preventive measures in Italy. J Dent Res. 2020;99(9):1030-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Prasad KR, Mounika G, Bodduru R, Veldurthi D, Madhuri A, Balu MS, et al. Assessment of knowledge and practice of infection control among Periodontists during COVID-19 pandemic–a questionnaire study. J Adv Res Rev. 2020;3(6):01-10. [crossref]
14.
Alzahrani SB, Alrusayes AA, Aldossary MS. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on dental education, research, and students. Int J Health Sci Res. 2020;10:207-12.
15.
Faccini M, Ferruzzi F, Mori AA, Santin GC, Oliveira RC, de Oliveira RC, et al. Dental care during COVID-19 outbreak: A web-based survey. Eur J Dent. 2020;1:14-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Becker K, Brunello G, Gurzawska-Comis K, Becker J, Sivolella S, Schwarz F, et al. Dental care during COVID-19 pandemic: Survey of experts’ opinion. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;12:1253-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Schlenz MA, Schmidt A, Wöstmann B, May A, Howaldt HP, Albert D, et al. Perspectives from dentists, dental assistants, students, and patients on dental care adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):3940. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Ahmadi H, Ebrahimi A, Ghorbani F. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on dental practice in Iran: A questionnaire-based report. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):01-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Cagetti MG, Cairoli JL, Senna A, Campus G. COVID-19 outbreak in North Italy: An overview on dentistry. A questionnaire survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3835. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Humagain M, Humagain R, Rokaya D. Dental practice during COVID-19 in Nepal: A descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association. 2020; 58(230):764. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Duruk G, Gümüs¸bog?a ZS¸ , Çolak C. Investigation of Turkish dentists’ clinical attitudes and behaviors towards the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study. Braz Oral Res. 2020;29:34.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56871.17107

Date of Submission: Apr 30, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 06, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Sep 16, 2022
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 02, 2022
• Manual Googling: Sep 12, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Sep 15, 2022 (21%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com