Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 157595

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : UC01 - UC04 Full Version

Effect of Saline Irrigation for Transurethral Resection of Prostate on Acid Base and Electrolyte Status- A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51582.15809
Nilam Dharma Virkar, Aparna Ashay Nerurkar, Geeta Anant Patkar

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 2. Additional Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Aparna Ashay Nerurkar,
Additional Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, 4th Floor, College Building, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400022, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: draparnanerurkar@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP), using bipolar resectoscope, is performed using 0.9% Normal Saline (NS) as irrigating fluid. The NS is absorbed at about 10-30 mL per minute of resection time. The TURP averages 45 to 90 minutes of resection time. Thus, 450-2700 mL of NS is expected to be absorbed in this short time. Rapid administration of higher quantities of NS can cause hyperchloraemic acidosis, hyperkalaemia and negative protein balance.

Aim: To detect changes in pH, serum electrolytes (serum bicarbonate, serum chloride, serum sodium, and serum potassium) and to record complications, if any, in patients undergoing bipolar TURP with 0.9% NS irrigation.

Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, from May 2017 to May 2018. Thirty patients undergoing saline bipolar TURP under subarachnoid block were studied. Preoperative and postoperative venous blood pH and serum electrolyte samples were collected. The quantity of NS used, duration of resection, and occurrence of complications were recorded and statistically analysed.

Results: The mean age, mean gland size, resection time and volume of irrigation fluid used were 65.17±7.2 years, 64.9±30.85 cc, 60.67±14.17 minutes and 23.73±4.78 Litres, respectively. The mean preoperative pH of 7.33±0.047 fell by 0.03 postresection (p-value=0.02) and mean serum sodium increased from 139±3.65 meq/L to 142.2±3.60 meq/L, which was statistically significant (p-value=0.01). Serum bicarbonate, serum potassium, and serum chloride did not show any significant change. On relating the various intraoperative parameters with biochemical changes, a statistically significant but clinically insignificant association was found between the amount of irrigation fluid used and changes in serum sodium levels.

Conclusion: The use of approximately 23.73 L NS in 60.67 mins of resection time and gland sizes up to 64.91 cc appear to produce no clinically significant changes in pH, serum electrolytes or complications with Bipolar TURP. However, further studies are needed to determine the acid base changes and safety with higher gland sizes requiring prolonged resection times and subsequently higher NS absorption.

Keywords

Bicarbonate, Bipolar, Chloride, pH, Serum sodium

The Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) is routinely used to treat symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy. The ideal irrigant for such endoscopic resection would be a user-friendly, non conducting medium that does not interfere with diathermy, has a high degree of translucency, has similar osmolarity to the serum and causes only minimal side-effects when absorbed (1). The NS is near ideal irrigation fluid for TURP; however, its electrical conducting properties prohibit its use with conventional monopolar TURP system (2). The TURP with bipolar resectoscope using NS as irrigating fluid is being increasingly performed. Irrigating fluid is absorbed at the rate of about 10-30 mL/minute of resection time (3). Though the usual duration of conventional TURP is limited to 45-90 minutes, resection time during bipolar TURP can be extended due to the relatively safer profile of NS irrigation. An average quantity of 450-2700 mL saline can thus be absorbed in this short time. Li H et al., reviewed the use of NS and concluded that despite its implied normalcy and physiological property, large volume (>2 L) saline infusion is associated with metabolic acidosis, hyperkalaemia, negative protein balance, increased occurrence of kidney dysfunction with possible reduced survival (4).

Multiple other studies in literature also state that administration of approximately 1-2 Liter intravenous NS in 60-90 minutes is associated with hyperchloraemic acidosis, an increased incidence of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) and need for renal replacement therapy, as well as higher postoperative in-hospital mortality (5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(13),(14),(15). This can be explained on the basis of the changes of Strong Ion Difference (SID) and the reduction in weak non volatile acids resulting in hyperchloraemic acidosis. In normal serum, the predominant cation is sodium (140 mmol/L) and predominant anion is chloride (100 mmol/L). The SID is approximately 40 mmol/L when pH is 7.4. 0.9% saline infusion causes elevations in both sodium and chloride levels, but the increase in chloride levels is much larger, resulting in a net SID reduction and acidosis.

A higher chloride level in the renal tubules is speculated to trigger tubule-glomerular feedback, causing afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction, leading to a fall in the glomerular filtration rate (5). Micro-perfusion experiments and real-time imaging studies reported a reduction in renal perfusion and an expansion in kidney volume; which in turn leads to reduced oxygen delivery to the renal parenchyma following saline infusion (4). Clinically, NS administration after abdominal and cardiovascular surgery is associated with increased requirement of blood products, bicarbonate therapy, reduced gastric blood flow, delayed recovery of gut function, and impaired cardiac contractility in response to ionotropes, prolonged hospital stay, and possibly increased mortality (4). The AKI occurs more frequently with use of saline infusion as compared to balanced fluid infusions in critically ill patients (4).

It was postulated that the absorption of NS at 15-20 mL per minute in an average TURP is equivalent to administration of intravenous NS 1 to 1.8 Litres in 60-90 minutes. Therefore, similar changes of hyperchloraemic acidosis may be seen with saline TURP. Hence, the study aimed to prospectively detect changes in pH, serum bicarbonate, serum chloride, serum sodium, serum potassium and record complications, if any, in patients undergoing bipolar TURP with 0.9% NS irrigation.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted at Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, from May 2017 to May 2018. The approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC/40/17).

Sample size calculation: Based on the pilot study of 10 cases, a sample size of 18 was required to detect 0.03 fall in pH. A sample size of 24 was required to detect 6 meq/L rise in chlorides based on a previous study (16). Considering a dropout rate of 10%, 30 patients were recruited.

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing TURP with bipolar cautery using NS as irrigation fluid under regional anaesthesia were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Non consenting patients, patients with pre-existing acidosis or alkalosis (pH <7.3 or >7.5), patients with pre-existing hyperchloremia (S.chlorides >107 meq/L), patients on sodium bicarbonate treatment, patients on diuretic treatment and patients with gastrointestinal diversions, diarrhoea were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A written informed consent was obtained and patient was taken on table. Standard monitoring in the form of pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, and non invasive blood pressure monitoring was initiated. Intravenous access was secured, preoperative venous blood pH and serum electrolytes sample was collected and 0.9% NS was started at 2 mL/kg/hr. Procedure was conducted under standard central neuraxial blockade. Subarachnoid block was given using 1.5 to 2 cc of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine injected in the sitting position at L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous space and T10 level obtained. Postoperative venous blood pH and serum electrolytes sample was collected at end of procedure. Quantity of irrigating fluid, duration of resection, preoperative and postoperative venous blood pH and serum electrolyte values and complications, if any were recorded in the proforma.

Atatistical Analysis

The data thus obtained was statistically analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21. The changes in pH and serum electrolytes were compared using paired student’s t-test. Association between pH, serum electrolyte levels with various intraoperative factors was done by applying one-way ANOVA test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant while a p-value <0.001 was considered very highly significant.

Results

The age of the patients ranged from 49 to 82 years, with mean of 65.17 (±7.2) years (Table/Fig 1). Mean gland size, resection time and volume of irrigation fluid used were 64.91 (±30.853) cc, 60.67 (±14.167) minutes, 23.73 (±4.770) L, respectively (Table/Fig 2). Most of the patients had gland sizes between 31 to 50 cc (Table/Fig 3).

A postresection fall in mean preoperative pH of 7.33±0.047 by 0.03 (p-value=0.02), and the increase in serum sodium from 139±3.65 meq/L to 142.2±3.60 meq/L (p-value=0.01) were seen. Serum bicarbonate, serum potassium, and serum chloride levels did not show significant change (Table/Fig 4). Though a statistically significant association between amount of irrigation fluid used and changes in serum sodium levels was found (p-value=0.047), no association between changes in chloride, potassium, and pH levels with gland size, resection time or irrigation fluid was found (Table/Fig 5). None of the study patients had complications like capsular perforation, bladder perforation and excessive bleeding.

Discussion

Bipolar TURP with NS has many advantages, such as decreased incidence of TURP syndrome, increased time available for resection, improved haemostasis, decreased bleeding, better surgeon comfort, better surgical exposure with less collateral and penetrative tissue damage, shorter catheter indwelling times, earlier hospital discharge and better patient satisfaction (17). Infusion of 0.9% saline solution, however, temporarily causes dilution hyperchloraemic acidosis in a dose-dependent manner (6),(7). Previous studies have examined changes in serum electrolytes during TURP; however, acid base balance has been neglected.

Hence, this prospective study was carried out in cohort of 30 patients undergoing bipolar TURP using saline as an irrigation fluid under regional anaesthesia, to detect changes in pH and serum electrolytes. A mean fall in pH by 0.03 (p-value=0.02), an increase in serum sodium from 139±3.65 meq/L to 142.2±3.60 meq/L (p-value=0.01), an association between amount of irrigation fluid used and changes in serum sodium levels (p-value=0.047) was found.

Scheingraber S et al., correlated the acid base changes to the amount of absorbed irrigation fluid in 20 TURP patients who received 2% ethanol, 0.54% mannitol or 2.7% sorbitol solution as irrigating fluid (18). The pH and bicarbonate dropped from 7.41 to 7.37 and 24.3 to 21.9 mmol/L, respectively and lactates increased from 1.2 to 2.3 mmol/L in the group with major fluid absorption. The pH fell from 7.44 to 7.42 with minimal decrease in bicarbonate, and lactates increased from 1.1 to 1.6 mmol/L in the minor or no absorption group. Strong ion difference showed a significant decrease in both groups; however, this was larger in the major absorption group. They concluded that larger irrigant absorption might lead to a clinically relevant metabolic acidosis and acid base balance monitoring was recommended. Hermanns T et al., in a study of 55 patients undergoing bipolar prostate vaporisation with green-light laser technique found significant decrease in pH by 0.09 in the nine patients with systemic fluid absorption (138-2166 mL). There were no significant changes in serum chloride, potassium, haemoglobin and haematocrit in their patients (19). Hafez MHES et al., studied 50 cases to compare the haemodynamic and biochemical changes between monopolar and bipolar TURP. They found no significant change in pH post procedure in both the groups but found significant decrease in serum sodium level by 9.53±2.26 in the monopolar group and by 3.53±2.50 in the bipolar group (20).

Saline has zero SID i.e., equal concentrations of sodium and chloride and zero total concentration of non volatile weak acid. The existing circulating albumin and phosphate is diluted with intravenous infusion of saline, thus reducing total concentration of non volatile weak acid causing metabolic alkalosis while simultaneously reducing SID leading to metabolic acidosis. The effect of SID reduction, however, overpowers that of non volatile weak acid reduction. This causes a net metabolic acidosis, in absence of a pre-existing acid-base disturbance. Thus, saline infusion causes hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis.

Thus, the statistically significant fall in pH in the study could be attributed to the use of normal saline as irrigating fluid. However, authors found no association between pH with the amount of fluid used, gland size or resection time. Authors expected the fall in pH to be accompanied by corresponding changes in serum chlorides and bicarbonates. However, the serum chloride and bicarbonate levels showed a marginal, insignificant increase from 101.6 to 101.8 meq/L and from 24.53 to 24.64 meq/L, respectively.

Changes in serum electrolytes have been extensively studied with use of various irrigation fluids for TURP. Yousef AA et al., in their randomized control trial on 360 patients undergoing TURP with 5% glucose, 1.5% Glycine or 0.9% saline as irrigation fluid found an insignificant increase in serum sodium (142.6±12.6 mmol/L) and reduction in serum potassium in the saline group as compared to the other groups (2). TURP syndrome was seen in 17 patients in the glycine group but none in either glucose or saline groups.

However, most of the other studies have found a milder decrease in serum sodium levels with the use of NS as irrigating fluid as compared to other irrigants. Chen Q et al., found that the decline in serum sodium postoperatively was smaller in the saline group (6.9±0.7 vs 14.8±1.8 mM, p-value=0.001) compared with monopolar in resection of large volume prostate (21). Ho HSS et al., also found that declines in the mean postoperative serum sodium for TURIS and monopolar TURP groups were 3.2 and 10.7 mmol/L, respectively (p-value<0.01) (22). Many other studies like Michielsen DP et al., (1.3 mmol/L), Singh H et al., (1.2 meq/L), Mamoulakis C et al., (0.8 mmol/L), Huang X et al., (2.02±0.53 mmol/L), Singhania P et al., (1.25 meq/L) showed similar drop in sodium levels (23),(24),(25),(26),(27). Watanabe Y et al., also found an increase in the serum chloride concentration from 99.4±2.8 meq/L to 104.2 ±5.1 meq/L in the preoperative and postoperative period respectively (16). Yousef AA et al., Scheingraber S et al., Hermanns T et al., Singhania P et al., did not find any changes in serum potassium values in any of their study groups (2),(18),(19),(27).

Dilutional hyponatremia secondary to fluid absorption is expected with use of all irrigating solutions. The variations in changes of serum sodium levels seen in the above studies may be due to many factors. These include choice and quantity of preoperative and intraoperative fluid, amount and nature of irrigating fluid used and administration of drugs like furosemide which alter sodium levels. Hyperchloremia and hyperkalaemia may occur with use of normal saline. Potassium and chloride concentrations may remain unaltered with the use of other irrigating fluids.

Complications like capsular perforation, bladder perforation and excessive bleeding can increase fluid absorption and/or resection time and affect the postoperative acid base and electrolyte status. None of the study patients had these complications. Hermanns T et al., in their study of 55 patients, recorded capsular perforation, injury to larger sinuses and deep bladder neck incision in three, one and 11 patients, respectively (19).

Limitation(s)

A limitation of the study was that it was an observational study. Better results may be obtained with prospective randomised clinical trials where, variables such as choice and quantity of preoperative and intraoperative fluid used, amount and nature of irrigating fluid used, administration of drugs altering sodium levels, duration of surgery, etc., can be controlled.

Conclusion

The use of normal saline of around 23.73 L, resection time of around 60.67 mins and gland sizes up to 64.91 cc appears to produce no clinically significant changes in pH, serum electrolytes or complications with Bipolar TURP. Hence, this technique can be safely used within the given parameters. However, further studies need to be performed to determine the acid base changes and safety with higher gland sizes requiring prolonged resection times and subsequently higher NS absorption. It may be found that changes in pH can be a determinant of fluid absorption in these cases. Accurate estimation of absorbed fluid can also be done using techniques like ethanol tagging.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Dr Ajit Sawant and the Department of Urology for their help in conducting the study.

References

1.
Collins JW, Macdermott S, Bradbrook RA, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. A comparison of the effect of 1.5% glycine and 5% glucose irrigants on plasma serum physiology and the incidence of transurethral resection syndrome during prostate resection. Br J Urol. 2005;96:368-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Yousef AA, Suliman GA, Elashry OM, Elsharaby MD, Elgamasy AEK. A randomized comparison between three types of irrigating fluids during transurethral resection in benign prostatic hyperplasia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2010;10(7):01-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Malhotra V, Malhotra A, Pamnani A, Gainsburg D. Anesthesia and the Renal and Genitourinary Systems. In: Gropper MA, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wieiner-Kronish JP, Cohen NH, Leslie K. Eds. Miller's anaesthesia. th ed. Philadelphia, PA; Elsevier; 2020:1929-59.
4.
Li H, Sun SR, Yap JQ, Chen JH, Qian Q. 0.9% saline is neither normal nor physiological. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2016;17(3):181-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Chowdhury AH, Cox EF, Francis ST, Lobo DN. A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusions of 0.9% saline and plasma-lyte® 148 on renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):18-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Dombre V, De Seigneux S, Schiffer E. Sodium chloride 0.9%: Nephrotoxic crystalloid? Rev Med Suisse. 2016;12(504):270-72, 274.
7.
Bakerr ME. A 0.9% saline induced hyperchloremic acidosis. J Trauma Nurs. 2015;22(2):111-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Disma N, Mameli L, Pistorio A, Davidson A, Barabino P, Locatelli BG, et al. A novel balanced isotonic sodium solution vs normal saline during major surgery in children up to 36 months: A multicenter RCT. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(9):980-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
O'Malley CM, Frumento RJ, Hardy MA, Benvenisty AI, Brentjens TE, Mercer JS, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of lactated Ringer's solution and 0.9% NaCl during renal transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(5):1518-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Lira A, Pinsky MR. Choices in fluid type and volume during resuscitation: Impact on patient outcomes. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:38. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
McDermid RC, Raghunathan K, Romanovsky A, Shaw AD, Bagshaw SM. Controversies in fluid therapy: Type, dose and toxicity. World J Crit Care Med. 2014;3(1):24-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Williams EL, Hildebrand KL, McCormick SA, Bedel MJ. The effect of intravenous lactated ringer's solution versus 0.9% sodium chloride solution on serum osmolality in human volunteers. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(5):999-1003. [crossref]
13.
Park CM, Chun HK, Jeon K, Suh GY, Choi DW, Kim S. Factors related to postoperative metabolic acidosis following major abdominal surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(7-8):574-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Tellan G, Antonucci A, Marandola M, Naclerio M, Fiengo L, Molinari S, et al. Postoperative metabolic acidosis: Use of three different fluid therapy models. Chir Ital. 2008;60(1):33-40.
15.
Cortés DO, Bonor AR, Vincent JL. Isotonic crystalloid solutions: A structured review of the literature. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(6):968-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Watanabe Y, Shido A, Saito Y. Detectors of fluid absorption during transurethral resection of prostate using saline as irrigant solution. Masui. 2012;61(2):164-69.
17.
Tang Y, Li J, Pu C, Bai Y, Yuan H, Wei Q, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2014;28(9):1107-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Scheingraber S, Heitmann L, Weber W, Finsterer U. Are there acid base changes during Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)? Anesth Analg 2000;90:946-50. [crossref]
19.
Hermanns T, Fankhauser CD, Hefermehl LJ. Prospective evaluation of irrigation fluid absorption during pure transurethral bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate using expired-breath ethanol measurements. BJU International. 2013;112:647-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Hafez MHES, Hamid MHEDA, Raouf SAE, Soaida SM. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral prostate resection: Comparison of hemodynamic and biochemical changes. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;30(1):47-52. [crossref]
21.
Chen Q, Zhang L, Fan QL, Zhou J, Peng YB, Wang Z. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: Results of a randomized trial with a 2-year follow-up. BJU Int. 2010;106:1339-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Ho HSS, Yip SKH, Lim KB, Fook S, Foo KT, Cheng CWS. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur Urol. 2007;52(2):517-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Michielsen DP, Coomans D, Peeters I, Braeckman JG. Conventional monopolar resection or bipolar resection in saline for the management of large (>60 g) benign prostatic hyperplasia: An evaluation of morbidity. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(4):207-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, Vani K. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: Randomized controlled study. J Endourol. 2005;19(3):333-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Mamoulakis C, Skolarikos A, Schulze M, Scoffone CM, Rassweiler JJ, Alivizatos G, et al. Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vsmonopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU International. 2012;109:240-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Huang X, Wang L, Wang XH, Shi HB, Zhang XJ, Yu ZY. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes deeper coagulation depth and less bleeding than monopolar transurethral prostatectomy. Urology. 2012;80(5):1116-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Singhania P, Dave N, Fernandes S, Pathak H, Iyer H. Transurethral resection of prostate: A comparison of standard monopolar versus bipolar saline resection. International Braz J Urol. 2010;36(2):183-89. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51582.15809

Date of Submission: Aug 19, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 03, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 30, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 20, 2021
• Manual Googling: Nov 26, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Nov 29, 2021 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com