Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 52044

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2021 | Month : August | Volume : 15 | Issue : 8 | Page : VC05 - VC09 Full Version

A Cross-sectional Study to Determine the Factors Affecting the Quality of Life in Patients with Grand Mal Epilepsy


Published: August 1, 2021 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/49723.15219
Jagriti Yadav, Priti Singh, Surekha Dabla, Rajiv Gupta

1. Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 2. Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 3. Senior Professor, Medicine, Department of Neurology, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 4. Senior Professor and Head, Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jagriti Yadav,
Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
E-mail: jagritipsyc07@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Epilepsy is a chronic neurological condition that affects various domains of life apart from causing physical dysfunction. It is associated with various cognitive and psycho-social complications that can adversely affect the Quality of Life (QoL).

Aim: To study the socio-demographic and clinical factors affecting QoL in Patients With Epilepsy (PWE).

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in northern India on patients with Grand Mal Epilepsy. Total 60 PWE were assessed for psychiatric co-morbidity using Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview version 6.0 and were divided into two groups, Group I and Group II, based on absence and presence of psychiatric co-morbidity, respectively. Self-administered QoL in Epilepsy-31 Scale was then used in both the groups to assess QoL in the study subjects and statistical analysis was done. Normally, distributed quantitative data was analysed using independent t-test for two groups and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test for three or more groups.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 27.68±9.51 years. A 55% of the study population were males and 45% of total study population were females. The mean total duration of epilepsy was 7.42±6.98 years. There was significant main effect due to socio-economic status for domains of emotional well-being (F=7.513, p=0.010), energy/fatigue (F=5.625, p=0.021), cognitive functions (F=7.708, p=0.007) and overall score (F=6.876, p=0.011) on QOLIE-31 scale. There was a significant main effect due to total duration of seizure disorder for domains of energy/fatigue (F=2.724, p=0.03) and cognitive functions (F=2.852, p=0.03). The mean scores of PWE with psychiatric co-morbidity were lower than PWE without psychiatric co-morbidity in all the domains of QoL in epilepsy scale and the differences in two groups were statistically significant (p=0.01).

Conclusion: The present study showed that QoL in PWE is associated with various socio-demographic and clinical factors beyond seizure control.

Keywords

Biopsychosocial model, Neuropsychiatric interface, Psychiatric disorders

Epilepsy is a multifaceted disorder with neurological dysfunction and psychosocial complications. India has a prevalence rate of around 5.59 per 1000 population (1). A study in collaboration with World Health Organisation (WHO) was conducted to assess treatment gap in PWE in India and it was found that only 20 out of 318 PWE consulted a qualified medical practitioner and 283 consulted faith healer (2).

In low and middle income countries mental health disorders are second leading cause of disease burden in terms of years lived with disability (3). Apprehensiveness, fear, unequal job opportunities, social dissatisfaction, marital issues etc., contribute to psychosocial distress in PWE thus predisposing them to risk of developing psychiatric co-morbidity. The prevalence of life time depression in PWE is around 20% (4). In a meta-analysis of 35 studies the point prevalence of major depressive disorder was 21.9% in PWE with higher prevalence in females (26.4%) than in males (16.7%) (5). The prevalence of anxiety in PWE was around 15-20% while psychosis has an estimated prevalence of 5.6% (6). Suicide is a leading cause of premature mortality in PWE and is five times more as compared to general population (7). There is bidirectional relationship between suicide attempts and development of epilepsy which can be explained by some common underlying pathology (8).

Among five common neurological conditions (epilepsy, migraine, stroke, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease) depression and anxiety has maximum impact on mental health component scores in epilepsy when assessed for Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) (9). Stigma also remains strongly associated with epilepsy and is negatively correlated with QoL (10). Various studies have been done to assess psychiatric co-morbidity in PWE with most of them taking into account only the mood disorders. Studies with more detailed evaluation of psychiatric co-morbidity and its correlation with QoL in PWE are still sparse (11),(12) especially from middle income countries. There is also scarcity of literature assessing independent effect of psychiatric co-morbidity on QoL in PWE. In best of our knowledge, no previous study has been conducted on Indian population minimising the epilepsy related confounding factors namely type and control of epilepsy. In this study, the epilepsy related confounding factors (type and control of epilepsy) have been minimised Thus, the study aimed to assess QoL in PWE and to compare QoL in PWE with and without psychiatric co-morbidity, in order ascertain the importance of comprehensive management of epilepsy.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Psychiatry and Neurology Department at Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India, over a period of one year from February 2019 till January 2020. The ethical clearance was sought from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak (vide letter no. IEC/18/psy04).

Inclusion criteria: The study enrolled patients who were diagnosed with epilepsy and already registered with the institute at least from last one year and purposive sampling was done. All the participants were more than 18 years of age, were on stable doses of anti-epileptic drugs and seizure free for last one month.

Exclusion criteria: The patients with presence of any chronic medical illness, mental and behavioural disorders due to substance, mental retardation, and speech or hearing disability were excluded from the study.

Sixty patients (purposive sampling) with grand mal epilepsy who consented for the study were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 30 PWE without psychiatric co-morbidity and group II was consisted of 30 PWE with psychiatric co-morbidity.

Study Procedure

The diagnosis of grand mal epilepsy was confirmed by the Neurology consultant (author SD) based on clinical presentation. A written informed consent was obtained from the study participants. The PWE were assessed for psychiatric co-morbidity using Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Version 6.0 and were divided into the two groups based on absence or presence of psychiatric co-morbidity (13). The patients in two groups were comparable in the type of epilepsy and adherence to the treatment from last one month. Self-administered QoL in Epilepsy-31 scale was then used in both the groups to assess QoL in the study subjects (14). It is shorter version of QOLIE-89 inventory and its hindi translated version was used for the ease of study subjects (15). An overall score was obtained using weighted average of multi item scale scores.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. The quantitative data was represented as mean and Standard Deviation (SD). Normally distributed quantitative data was analysed using independent t-test for two groups and ANOVA test for three or more groups. Point of statistical significance was taken when p-value <0.05.

Results

The socio-demographic, socio-economic status (according to Kuppuswamy scale) and clinical profile of the study groups are summarised in (Table/Fig 1) (16). The majority of the study population resided in rural area (70%) and belonged to joint family (65%). The mean age of the study population was 27.68±9.51 years. The mean age of onset of seizures in the study population was 20.73±8.71 years. Mean total duration of epilepsy was 7.42±6.98 years. Among all the patients 63.33% were on monotherapy and 36.67% were on polytherapy. Among the patients with psychiatric co-morbidity, majority had major depressive disorder (n=13) followed by generalised anxiety disorder (n=6), panic disorder (n=4) and social phobia (n=3).

F-ratio could not attain the level of significance for age (p>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the any domain score among different age groups (Table/Fig 2).

Score on all the domains varied due to socio-economic status. ANOVA showed a significant main effect of socio-economic status for emotional well-being (F=7.513, p=0.010), energy/fatigue (F=5.625, p=0.021), cognitive functions (F=7.708, p=0.007) and overall score (F=6.876, p=0.011) (Table/Fig 3).

There was no statistically significant difference in any domain score among different age of onset categories (p>0.05) (Table/Fig 4). Score on all the domains varied due to total duration of epilepsy. ANOVA showed a significant main effect of total duration of illness for energy/fatigue (F=2.724, p=0.03) and cognitive functions (F=2.852, p=0.03) (Table/Fig 5).

The score on each domain was lower in PWE with psychiatric co-morbidity and the differences in two groups were statistically significant (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 6). F ratio revealed the significant main effect of psychiatric co-morbidity for overall QoL domain (F=61.80 p<0.01) on QOLIE scale. However, the interaction between psychiatric co-morbidity, gender and marital status remained non-significant (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

Epilepsy is a chronic condition that has various psychological implications. Despite understanding of psychiatric co-morbidity in PWE, especially depression and anxiety, the symptoms are often under reported and under recognised (17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23). In the present study also, the most common psychiatric co-morbidity was major depressive disorder. However, in the study conducted by Osman A et al., non epileptic attack disorder was the most common co-morbidity followed by affective disorders (21). This difference from present study findings can be attributed to the tool used for evaluation of psychiatric disorder {Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Version 6.0)}, which does not include module for the diagnosis of dissociative convulsions/non epileptic attack disorder.

In this study, scores of various domains of QOLIE-31 scale did not differ due to age of the study participants. The study finding align with previous research by Norsa’adah B et al., and Sajatovic M et al., which reported no significant difference in mean QOL scores due to socio-demographic factors (24),(25). This was however in contrast with the findings by Ashwin M et al., and Melikyan E et al., where scores of various domains decreased with increasing age (26),(27). This could possibly result from the diagnosis of epilepsy for the first time in later life. It can be a poor prognostic factor for older people as it is a chronic health condition adding to the burden of old age in terms of loss of independence. However, in the present study there were no extreme of age patients who were diagnosed for the first time. Moreover, less stigma and employment insecurities are perceived in old age as compared to young age. Therefore, PWE at different age groups perceive different psychosocial stressors and they need to be addressed timely (28).

The study results yield a significant main effect of socio-economic status for emotional well being, energy/fatigue, cognitive functions and overall score. It was consistent with previous studies which have found significant correlation of economic variables like household income with QOL independent of depression and seizure control (25),(29),(30). Chronic health conditions like epilepsy add to the occupational dysfunction and are independent risk factors for various psychiatric co-morbidity. In addition, there is financial burden for disease management itself. Therefore, vocational counselling services, welfare schemes and occupational rehabilitation can aid in improving QOL in PWE.

The scores of various domains of QOLIE-31 scale did not differ by age of the patient at the onset of epilepsy. This is consistent with studies done in the past (31),(32). This can be explained by various factors such as employment status, side effect profile of Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs) and co-existing co-morbidity at any age. However, it has been emphasised that there is impairment in QOL in PWE who have been first diagnosed in later life attributing it to poor adjustment to a chronic health condition in old age, psychosocial impairment and poor tolerance to AEDs (33). Therefore, holistic management at any age of onset is required to improve the QoL in PWE.

In this study, a significant effect of total duration of epilepsy was found on the domains of energy/fatigue and cognitive functions on QOLIE-31 scale. The findings was consistent with previous reports (17),(27). Subjective fatigue and lack of energy are commonly reported in PWE. It can be attributed to AEDs which have sedative property or underlying depressive disorder (34). Furthermore, the neuronal dysfunction, structural lesions and long term use of AEDs can lead to impaired cognition (35),(36). Thus, early control of seizures with rational use of AEDs and addressing psychiatric co-morbidity is likely to have better outcome on the domains of QoL.

The results also suggest that the PWE with psychiatric co-morbidity have poorer QoL as assessed by QOLIE-31 scale in all the domains. The findings validate the already existing studies despite which psychiatric co-morbidity are overlooked especially in middle income countries (18),(22),(25). Furthermore, in the present study the interaction effect of psychiatric co-morbidity, gender and marital status among the study population has been also evaluated. There was no significant interactive effect observed, thereby suggesting that psychiatric co-morbidity independent of gender and marital status affect the overall score on QOLIE-31 scale.

Limitation(s)

The study was limited by its cross-sectional design and small sample size. For a better understanding intervention regarding psychiatric co-morbidity and outcome study would have been better. Further, the use of self-reporting QOLIE-31 scale could have led to self deception and falsification of answers.

Conclusion

The present study shows that QoL in PWE is associated with various psychosocial and clinical factors beyond seizure control. Thus, QoL in PWE can be improved with interventions targeting these factors. A significant difference in all the domains of QoL is observed in PWE without psychiatric co-morbidity and with psychiatric co-morbidity which clearly highlights need for screening for psychiatric co-morbidity and appropriate referral services in PWE.

The present study can also be considered as a template for studies with larger sample size and longitudinal design which can be conducted in future in middle income countries. This will help in better understanding of factors which can be generalised and targeted to improve the QoL in PWE. Professionals should acknowledge the uniqueness of each case, assess the individual’s symptoms and psychosocial factors in a comprehensive manner, always consider the possibility of psychiatric co-morbidity and need for appropriate referral.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the patients’ co-operation and consent to participate in the study. The authors also acknowledge the co-operation of QOLIE Development Group for granting the permission for using the translated version of the scale.

References

1.
Sridharan R, Murthy BN. Prevalence and pattern of epilepsy in India. Epilepsia. 1999;40(5):631-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Nizamie SH, Akhtar S, Banerjee I, Goyal N. Health care delivery model in epilepsy to reduce treatment gap: World Health Organisation study from a rural tribal population if India. Epilepsy Res. 2009;84(2-3):146-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation GBD compare data visualisation. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/.
4.
Fiest KM, Dykeman J, Patten SB, Wiebe S, Kaplan GG, Maxwell CJ, et al. Depression in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2013;80(6):590-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Kim M, Kim Y, Kim D, Yang T, Kwon O. Major depressive disorder in epilepsy clinics: A meta-analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;84:56-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Clancy MJ, Clarke MC, Connor DJ, Cannon M, Cotter DR. The prevalence of psychosis in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:75. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Thurman DJ, Logroscino G, Beghi E, Hauser WA, Hesdorffer DC, Newton CR, et al; Epidemiology Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy. The burden of premature mortality of epilepsy in high-income countries: A systematic review from the Mortality Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2017;58(1):17-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Hesdorffer DC, Ishihara L, Webb DJ. Occurrence and reccurence of attempted suicide among people with epilepsy.JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;12:106-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Prisnie JC, Sajobi TT, Wang M, Patten SB, Fiest KM, Bulloch AGM, et al. Effects of depression and anxiety on quality of life in five common neurological disorders. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018;52:58-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Kumari P, Ram D, Nizamie SH, Goyal N. Stigma and quality of life in individuals with epilepsy: A preliminary report. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;15(3):358-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Shetty P, Naik R, Saroja A, Punith K. Quality of life in patients with epilepsy in India. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011;2(1):33-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Nagarathnam M, Vengamma B, Shalini B, Latheef S. Stigma and polytherapy: Predictors of quality of life in patients with epilepsy from South India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2017;20(3):233-41.
13.
Sheehan D, Janavs J, Harnett-Sheehan K, Sheehan M, Gray C, Lecrubier Y, et al. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, version 6.0. Tampa, USA: University of South Florida College of Medicine, Paris, France: Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne. 2009.
14.
Cramer JA, Perrine K, Devinsky O, Bryant-Comstock L, Meador K, Hermann BP. Development and cross-cultural translation of a 31-item quality of Iife questionnaire (QOLIE-31) Epilepsia. 1998;39:81-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Mehndiratta MM, Alam A, Pandey S, Singh E. Assessment of quality of life in Indian adults with epilepsy and their caregivers. Int J Epilepsy. 2015;2:11-18. [crossref]
16.
Bairwa M, Rajput M, Sachdeva S. Modified kuppuswamy’s socioeconomic scale: Social researcher should include updated income criteria, 2012. Indian J Community Med. 2013;38:185-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Amruth G, Praveen-kumar S, Nataraju B, Kasturi P. Study of psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy by using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;33:94-100. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Hamid H, Blackmon K, Cong X, Dziura J, Atlas LY, Vickrey BG, et al. Mood, anxiety, and incomplete seizure control affect quality of life after epilepsy surgery. Neurology. 2014;82(10):887-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Jacoby A, Snape D, Lane S, Baker GA. Self-reported anxiety and sleep problems in people with epilepsy and their association with quality of life. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;43:149-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Mula M, Cavalheiro E, Guekht A, Kanner AM, Lee HW, Thomson A, et al. Educational needs of epileptologists regarding psychiatric comorbidities of the epilepsies: A descriptive quantitative survey. Epileptic Disord. 2017;19(2):178-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Osman A, Seri S, Cavanna AE. Clinical characteristics of patients with epilepsy in a specialist neuropsychiatry service. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;58:44-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Zhao T, Sun MY, Yu PM, Zhu GX, Tang XH, Shi YB, et al. Evaluation of clinical aspects and quality of life as risk factors for depression in patients with epilepsy. Seizure. 2012;21(5):367-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Clary Munger HM, Snively BM, Hamberger MJ. Anxiety is common and independently associated with clinical features of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;85:64-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Norsa’adah B, Zainab J, Knight A. The quality of life of people with epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre in Malaysia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2013;11:143. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Sajatovic M, Tatsuoka C, Welter E, Perzynski AT, Colon-zimmermann K, Doren JR Van, et al. Targeted self-management of epilepsy and mental illness for individuals with epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidity. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;64:152-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Ashwin M, Rakesh PS, Pricilla RA, Manjunath K, Jacob KS, Prasad J. Determinants of quality of life among people with epilepsy attending a secondary care rural hospital in south India. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2013;4:62-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Melikyan E, Guekht A, Milchakova L, Lebedeva A, Bondareva I, Gusev E. Health-related quality of life in Russian adults with epilepsy: The effect of socio-demographic and clinical factors. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;25(4):670-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Martin M, Grünendahl M, Martin P. Age differences in stress, social resources, and well-being in middle and older age. The Journals of Gerontology. 2001;56(4):214-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Lee S, Kim J, Seo J, Won Y, Lee J, Moon H, et al. Predictors of quality of life and their interrelations in Korean people with epilepsy: A MEPSY study. Seizure Eur J Epilepsy. 2014;23(9):762-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Ranjana G, Dwajani S, Kulkarni C, Sarma GRK. The sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacotherapy characteristics influencing quality of life in patients with epilepsy: A cross sectional study. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2014;5:S07-12.
31.
Auriel E, Landov H, Blatt I, Theitler J, Gandelman-marton R, Chistik V, et al. Quality of life in seizure-free patients with epilepsy on monotherapy. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;14(1):130-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Muche EA, Ayalew MB, Abdela OA. Assessment of quality of life of epileptic patients in Ethiopia. International Journal of Chronic Diseases. 2020;01-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Baker Gus A, Jacoby ANN, Buck D, Brooks J, Potts P, David W. The quality of life of older people with epilepsy: Findings from a UK community study. Seizure. 2001;10:92-99. [crossref]
34.
Devinsky O. Therapy for neurobehavioral disorders in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2004;45:34-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Aarts JHP, Bimmin CD, Smit AD, Wilkins AJ. Selective cognitive impairement during focal and generalised epileptiform EEG activity. Brain. 1984;107:293-308. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Drane DL, Meador KJ. Epilepsy, anticovulsant drugs and cognition. Baillieres Clin Neurol. 1996;5:877-85.

DOI and Others

10.7860/JCDR/2021/49723.15219

Date of Submission: Apr 01, 2021
Date of Peer Review: May 04, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jun 26, 2021
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2021

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 04, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jun 16, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jul 27, 2021 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com