Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 250627

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2021 | Month : July | Volume : 15 | Issue : 7 | Page : ZC01 - ZC06 Full Version

A Retrospective Study of Roots and Root Canal Morphology in Mandibular Premolars using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Delhi-NCR


Published: July 1, 2021 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/48413.15106
Sneh Mishra, Sonali Taneja, Vidhi Kiran Bhalla, Akshay Rathore

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Its Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Its Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Its Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Reader, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, ITS Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sneh Mishra,
Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics,
Its Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Ghaziabad-201009, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: euplectellasneh@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The anatomical heterogeneity of mandibular premolars has always been considered an enigma and it makes them potentially prone to high rates of endodontic failure. Only few studies have discussed the potential role of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in the assessment of root morphology, canal configuration and their complex variations.

Aim: To investigate the number of roots and root canals along with the canal configuration in mandibular premolars in the Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR) population using CBCT imaging.

Materials and Methods: The retrospective observational study was conducted where 432 CBCT images of 108 patients were acquired from different CBCT centres in Delhi-NCR region to determine the anatomy and morphology of mandibular premolars. The number of roots, root canals and their configuration and its association with symmetry and gender was evaluated. Pearson Chi-square test and Fisher’s-exact test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The mandibular first and second premolars reported with single root in 94.9% and 98.1% cases, respectively. Majority of 1st premolars displayed 2 canals (59.7%) whereas 2nd premolars exhibited single canal (58.3%) more frequently. Type I configuration was most prevalent in both 1st premolar (39.8%) and 2nd premolars (60.2%). Type V configuration was significantly reported on the left in both mandibular 1st and 2nd premolars (13.9% and 4.6%), respectively. There was no significant gender predilection observed for the morphology of roots, root canal and canal configuration.

Conclusion: In Delhi-NCR, there was a high prevalence of multiple canals and variable configurations in 1st premolars whereas single root canal and Type I canal configuration were more frequent in 2nd premolars with a significant bilateral distribution. However, in both mandibular premolars there was a slight inclination reported for multiple canals and variable configurations towards left with no gender predilection.

Keywords

Anatomic variations, Bilateral symmetry, National capital region, Number of canals, Number of roots, Root canal configuration, Vertucci’s classification

Success of endodontic therapy depends on a thorough understanding of root canal morphology and internal canal complexities. Lack of knowledge on canal space anatomy is considered as the second most important reason that leads to failure of endodontic therapy (1). The anatomical heterogeneity of mandibular premolars is one of the most enigmatic that also makes them potentially prone to high rates of endodontic failure (2),(3). Numerous factors like ethnicity, age, gender and position have contributed to the variation in morphology and configuration of mandibular premolars (4),(5). In endodontic literature, numerous studies have reported presence of multiple roots and variable canal morphology in mandibular premolars (6),(7),(8).

Various methods like canal staining, tooth clearing, root sectioning, microscopic examination, examination of conventional radiographs, etc. have been used in many studies to identify canal configuration (9),(10),(11),(12),(13). There has been a recent shift towards the use of CBCT and micro-CT techniques for the purpose of identification of anatomical complexities over these methods which are more precise and relatively non invasive. Conventional radiographs provide 2-D information and are unable to tell the root canal complexities. The techniques to study 3-Dimensional (3D) morphology of the pulpal anatomy are in vitro methods like sectioning and clearing. However, the morphology of the exterior of tooth is destroyed in these methods. In contrast, CBCT provides non invasive 3D information of root canal morphology that helps in best management of such clinical challenge (14),(15).

To the best of our knowledge, there was no previous study fron Delhi-NCR using CBCT to assess the root canal morphology and configuration of mandibular premolars and its association with symmetry and gender. Thus, this study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the root canal morphology and canal configuration of mandibular premolars using CBCT and determine its association with symmetry and gender in the Indian sub-population (Delhi-NCR region).

Material and Methods

The retrospective observational study was conducted after obtaining clearance from ethical committee of the local Institutional Review Board under the protocol number ITSCDSR/IIEC/RP/2018/019. The CBCT data was collected from five CBCT centres selected across the region of Delhi-NCR where the study was conducted in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics in conjunction with the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology at ITS Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Muradnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Inclusion criteria:

• Scan showing entire mandible including root apices of the premolars.
• Balanced distribution of right versus left premolars.
• Intact roots without fractures or cracks.
• Premolars without posts or previous root canal treatment.

Exclusion criteria:

• Apicoectomy or periapical surgery.
• Odontogenic or non odontogenic pathology.
• Developmental anomalies.
• External or internal root resorption.
• Calcifications.
• Previous endodontic treatment.
• Extensive coronal restorations or posts.
• Root caries reaching trifurcation.
• Poor quality images or artifacts.

Out of total 130 CBCT scans, 108 scans were selected and 22 scans were excluded as the images did not satisfy the inclusion criteria.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was estimated on the basis of a pilot study which was conducted in same department where 20 CBCT images (4 CBCT images were selected from each centre by simple random sampling) of the patients were evaluated which revealed that the prevalence for single root in majority of mandibular premolars was found to be 92.4% in this region. Thus, for expected prevalence of 92.4%, using the following formula for evaluation of sample size, authors found it to be 108 patients (16).

N= z2×p (1-p) / d2

Where, N=Sample size

z=z statistic for level of confidence=1.96
p=Expected prevalence or proportion=92.4%=0.924 (From the pilot study)
d=Precision=5%=0.05

On the basis of availability, a total of 130 patients in the age group between 15-60 years, referred to CBCT imaging centres for complete mandibular CBCT scans between January 2016 to May 2019 (inclusive of the 20 CBCT scans taken for the pilot study) for their dental diagnosis and comprehensive treatment planning were taken up for the study and their records were evaluated in two weeks duration in June 2019. The patients were informed and consent was obtained. The CBCT machine used for data acquisition was NewTom Giano (NewTom, Verona, Italy). All the CBCT scans included were acquired at a resolution in the range of 150-200 microns, 8×5 cm FOV, 90 KVp, 10 mA and 3.6 seconds exposure time in reference to previous study (17).
Patients fulfilling the following eligibility criteria were selected for the study. The final sample was then analysed in the Multi-Planar (MPR) mode of the interactive CBCT software, NNT viewer (version 7.0) in axial, coronal and sagittal planes to assess the root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. The tooth of interest and plane were triangulated in the axial, coronal and sagittal planes. The axial plane was evaluated from coronal aspect of the tooth to the root apex to evaluate the following parameters-

a) The number of roots

1. A single-rooted
2. A multiple-rooted

b) The number of canals
1. Single canal
2. Two/multiple canal

c) Canal configuration

The canal configuration was analysed according to criteria of Vertucci (1984) (18) into eight categories:

Type I (1) Single canal extending from pulp chamber to the apex.

Type II (2-1) Two separate canals extending from the pulp chamber to merge short of the apex to form one canal.

Type III (1-2-1) One canal extending from the pulp chamber, divides into two within the root, and then merge to exit as one canal.

Type IV (2) Two separate canals extending from the pulp chamber to the apex.

Type V (1-2) Single canal extending from the pulp chamber that divides short of the apex into two separate canals with separate apical foramina.

Type VI (2-1-2) Two separate canals extending from the pulp chamber that merge within the body of the root, and re-divide short of the apex to exit as two separate canals.

Type VII (1-2-1-2) Single canal extending from the pulp chamber that divides and then merge within the body of the root, and finally re- divides into two separate canals short of the apex.

Type VIII (3) Three separate canals extending from the pulp chamber to the apex.

Author analysed the predilection of above parameters with respect to gender and symmetry.

Statistical Analysis

All the images were evaluated by an endodontist well versed in working with CBCT and confirmed by a certified maxillofacial radiologist experienced in CBCT imaging using manufacturer’s software (NNT viewer, Newtom). Data was analysed with the Chi-square test and Fisher’s-exact test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 16.0, and the significance was set at a 95% confidence level p-value.

Results

A total of 432 CBCT images (mandibular 1st and 2nd premolar; n=216 each) from final 108 patients (63 males and 45 females) with mean age group of 29.14±10.05 years were eligible for the study.

1. Number of roots and its association with gender and symmetry

Majority of the first premolars reported the presence of one root (205, 94.9%) followed by two roots (11, 5.1%) with no significant gender predilection (p-value=1) (Table/Fig 1). In mandibular 2nd premolars, the prevalence was more for single root was (212, 98.1%) and rare (4, 1.9%) for 2-rooted cases with no significant gender preference ((p-value=0.113)) (Table/Fig 2). High level of bilateral symmetry was observed in both the 1st and 2nd premolars in association with the number of roots (Table/Fig 3)a,b and no specific gender or side predilection was observed (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2). Prevalence for 3 roots was not found in either of the premolars (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2).

2. Number of canals and its association with gender and symmetry

Majority of 1st premolars displayed two canals (129, 59.7%) (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 3)a,b followed by single canal (86, 39.8%) with a propensity for left side with no significant gender predilection (p-value=0.171)) (Table/Fig 1). There was a single case of 3 canals (1, 0.5%) reported in 1st premolar in males (Table/Fig 1). Single canal was most frequent (126, 58.3%) in second premolars (Table/Fig 2). followed by two canals (90, 41.7%) with no significant gender predilection (p-value=0.220) (Table/Fig 2), (Table/Fig 3)a,b.

3. Canal configuration and its association with gender and symmetry

Majority of the first premolars reported with Type I configuration (86, 39.8%) followed by Type II (58, 26.9%) with a significant bilaterally symmetrical distribution but no significant gender preference (p-value=0.063) (Table/Fig 1). In 1st premolars, Type III canal configuration was seen to be significantly more prevalent on right (12.1%) (p-value <0.005), with no significant gender predilection (p-value=0.063) (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 4)a-d. In 1st premolars, type V canal configuration was seen to be more prevalent (13.9%) on left (p-value <0.005) with no significant gender predilection (p-value=0.063) (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 5)a-d. Majority of the second premolars reported with higher percentage of Type I configuration (130, 60.2%) than that of 1st premolars, followed by Type II configuration (67, 31.0%) with a significant bilateral distribution but no significant gender predilection (p-value=0.330) (Table/Fig 2). In 2nd premolars, Type V canal configuration was reported only on left side (4.6%) with no significant gender preference (p-value=0.330) (Table/Fig 2).

Discussion

The propensity of mandibular premolars for anomalous variations in the radicular anatomy has been found to be implicated as a major reason for the failure (18),(19),(20),(21). Therefore, a thorough understanding of this complex system is necessary. The present study utilised the CBCT archives for evaluation of the canal morphology of mandibular premolars due to a high level of reproducibility of 3D information as shown in previous studies (22),(23),(24). There was a high prevalence of single root with two canals in 1st premolars which was bilaterally symmetrical and in accordance with studies in German and Western Chinese population (25),(26). However, presence of multiple roots has been reported in Saudi, Iranian and Kuwaiti population (27),(28),(29). The number of root canals in 1st premolars was found to be higher on the left. There was no significant gender predilection for both root and number of root canals. However, in different population, the association between morphology with gender and symmetry has been expressed variably which could be attributed to the sample size, ethnicity and methodology employed (29),(30).

In the present study, a variety of canal geometries were observed in 1st premolars. Type I followed by Type II configuration was most prevalent which was consistently observed in previous studies (30),(31),(32). Type III and Type V canal configuration were also reported, but with a lower percentage which was inconsistent with the results of Kottoor J et al., and Shetty A et al., (30),(33),(34). A bilateral symmetrical distribution was observed in all the canal configurations but Type V configuration was expressed significantly higher on left and Type III configuration on the right. However, there was no gender predilection reported in association with variable configuration. In contrast, a review of literature by Kottoor J et al., concluded variability in configuration to be significantly present for the male population (30).

In case of 2nd premolar, most of the cases presented with single root and single canal which was similar with the results of Bulut DG et al., and Burklein S et al., (17),(25); but the prevalence rate of single canal was lower than that reported by Bulut DG et al., and Kottoor J et al., (17),(30). In contrast with present study, the Jordanian and Taiwanese-Chinese population reported with a higher predilection for multiple canals in 2nd premolars (35),(36). These contradictory findings could be the result of variations in methodology as well as the ethnic and geographic differences (27),(30).

Type I and Type II canal configurations were reported to be most common in 2nd premolars, which was inconsistent with South Indian population that reported significantly higher percentage of Type IV (34). Overall, mandibular second premolars had a lower rate of variations in the canal systems which were in accordance with Western Chinese population (26). Bilaterally, a highly symmetrical distribution was reported for number of roots, root canals and canal configurations with no significant difference in gender predilection. This result was in accordance with Alfawaz H et al., and Corbella S et al., who also support its relevance in clinical cases (27),(32). However, Type V canal configuration was observed only on the left side in present study which could be because of the sample size distribution.

In context with the previous Indian studies, most of the population has reported the prevalence for single root in both 1st and 2nd premolars (9),(10),(11),(13),(34),(37),(38). On the contrary, in terms of canal morphology, the present study showed a higher prevalence for 2 canals in 1st premolars (9),(10),(11),(37),(38),(39). In terms of canal configuration, higher propensity for Type IV configuration has been reported after Type I and Type II (10),(37),(38). In contrast, present study reported with a higher prevalence for Type III and Type V configuration in Delhi-NCR population which corroborated with the finding of Shetty A et al., and Natanasabapathy V et al., (34),(40). In terms of gender preference, Iyer VH et al., reported that females presented with a higher variation in canal morphology and configuration than males in South Indian population (9), whereas Kamath A et al., reported a higher preference for males for the same (39). This finding did not corroborate with the present study population where almost no significant gender preference was observed (Table/Fig 6) (7),(8),(9),(13),(17),(25),(26),(27),(31),(32),(33),(34),(35),(36),(37),(38),(39),(40). These variable findings in different subpopulation may again be a consequence of difference in the sample size distribution.

The present study not only reported with a high prevalence for multiple canals and variable configuration, but a tendency for splitting/bifurcation of the canals at the level of the middle and apical half of the root was observed. A single case of Vertucci Class VIII and an atypical canal configuration (that could not be classified according to the Vertucci’s classification and was kept in miscellaneous group) were reported in 1st premolars. The propensity and prevalence for such complex anatomy necessitates caution for better clinical management (41),(42). Such cases may be easily disguised in routine radiographs in clinical situations and hence should be overall highly suspected (43),(44).

Root canal system presents with a variable course from orifice till the apex and may include single and multiple bifurcations as well as union (45). Thus, it is paramount to be thorough with the variations in canal configurations that have been commonly reported in mandibular premolars for predictable success in endodontic management of such cases.

It is imperative to note that this study revealed some highly interesting findings in terms of morphology of mandibular premolars. This study also emphasised on diagnostic value of CBCT in complex cases which may be of crucial importance for dental personnel, who treat large numbers of Delhi-NCR group of population, both in decision making and during treatment. Considering the variations reported in previous studies, more retrospective studies with a larger sample size may help understand and add to the knowledge of mandibular premolars. The data of present study can be compared to those of other populations and will facilitate diagnosis and treatment planning in this region of Indian population.

Limitation(s)

The present study showed few limitations. The parameters like root and canal curvature, foramen location/shape, tooth length, position of the bifurcation of the canal, invagination of the root, root thickness, lateral canals as well as presence of C-shaped canals were not evaluated. A recent CBCT study in the population of Chennai demonstrated parameters like Root Canal Isthmus (RCI) and Inter-Orifice Distance (IOD) in mandibular premolars and their correlation which was not taken up in the present study (40). Also, other than Vertucci’s classification, no other classification system was considered which would have enabled a more comprehensive understanding. Use of CBCT was preferred over radiographs which require more exposure to radiation. Also, scattering and beam hardening artefacts due to presence of high density structures like enamel, restorations, metal post, implant, etc., in vicinity to the area of interest may have affected the image quality. Also, the sample selected may not have been a precise representation of the Delhi-NCR population which has the highest share of inter-state migrant urban agglomeration in the total population (46).

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first CBCT based investigation in the region of Delhi-NCR that served as a guide to the root canals of the premolar teeth for this ethnic group. A high prevalence was reported for single root with two canals and Vertucci Type I configuration in 1st premolars and single root with single canal and Type I configuration in 2nd premolars. A higher variability in canal configuration was reported in mandibular 1st premolars with no significant gender predilection. Most cases presented with middle and apical splitting of canal that accounts for percentage of failures and require a detailed preoperative radiographic examination along with adjuncts like CBCT, whenever necessary.

References

1.
Green D. Morphology of the pulp cavity of the permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1955;8(7):743-59. [crossref]
2.
Slowey RR. Root canal anatomy. Road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1979;23(4):555-73.
3.
Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology of mandibular premolar. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978;97(1):47-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Zillich R, Dawson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;36:738-44. [crossref]
5.
Cleghorn M, Christie WH, Cecilia CS. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular second premolar-a literature review. J Endod.1987;33(9):1031-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Aminsobhani M, Sadegh M, Meraji N, Razmi H, Kharazifard MJ. Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in an Iranian population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Dent. 2013;10(4):358-66.
7.
Awawdeh LA and Al-Qudah AA. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2008;41(3):240-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Khedmat S, Assadian H, Saravani AA. Root canal morphology of the mandibular first premolars in an Iranian population using cross-sections and radiography. J Endod. 2010;36(2):214-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Iyer VH, Indira R, Ramachandran S, Srinivasan MR. Anatomical variations of mandibular premolars in Chennai population. Indian J Dent Res. 2006;17:07-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Velmurugan N, Sandhya R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in an Indian population: A laboratory study. Int Endod J. 2009;42:54 58. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Sandhya R, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Assessment of root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in the Indian population using spiral computed tomography: An invitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21:169-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Parekh V, Shah N, Joshi H. Root canal morphology and variations of mandibular premolars by clearing technique: An invitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011;12(4):318-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Jain A, Bahuguna R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a Gujarati population- an invitro study. Dent Res J. 2011;8(3):118-22.
14.
Yajima A, Otonari-Yamamoto M, Sano T, Hayakawa Y, Otonari T, Tanabe T, et al. Cone-beam CT (CB Throne) applied to dentomaxillofacial region. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2006;47(3):133-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75-80.
16.
Daniel WW. Biostatistics-A Foundation for Analysis in The Health Sciences, 7th Edition, New York: John Wily & Son. (1999).
17.
Bulut DG, Kose E, Ozcan G, Sekerci AE, Canger EM, Sisman Y. Evaluation of root morphology and root canal configuration of premolars in the Turkish individuals using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(4):551-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth; Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58(5):589-99. [crossref]
19.
Kishen A, Peters OA, Zehnder M, Diogenes AR, Nair MK. Advances in endodontics: Potential applications in clinical practice. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(3):199-206. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2001;34(5):359-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Baroudi K, Kazkaz M, Sakka S, Tarakji B. Morphology of root canals in lower human premolars. Niger Med J. 2012;53(4):206-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, Azevedo B, Azevedo JR. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2008;34(3):273-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Patel S, Dawood A, Ford T, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J. 2007;40(10):818-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford T. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J. 2009;42(6):447-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Burklein S, Heck R, Schafer E. Evaluation of the root canal anatomy of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a selected German population using cone-beam computed tomographic data. J Endod. 2017;43(9):1448-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ, Zhang R, Tian YY, Wang H, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population. BMC Med Imaging. 2012;20(12):18. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Al-Dahman YH, Al-Jebaly AS, Alnassar FA, Alsubait S et al. Evaluation of root canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Saudi population using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(1):137-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Rahimi S, Shahi S, Yavari HR, Manafi H, Eskandarzadeh N. Root canal configuration of mandibular first and second premolars in an Iranian population. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007;1(2):59-64.
29.
Zaatar EI, Al-Kandari AM, Alhomaidah S, Al-Yasin IM. Frequency of endodontic treatment in Kuwait: Radiographic evaluation of 846 endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1997;23(7):453-56. [crossref]
30.
Kottoor J, Albuquerque D, Velmurugan N, Kuruvilla J. Root anatomy and root canal configuration of human permanent mandibular premolars: A systematic review. Anat Res Int. 2013;2013:254250. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Llena C, Fernandez J, Ortolani PS, Forner L. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Spanish population. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(3):221-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Corbella S, Baruffaldi M, Perondi I, Taschieri S. Cone-beam computed tomography investigation of the anatomy of permanent mandibular premolars in a cohort of Caucasians. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10(1):e12373. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Arayasantiparb R, Banomyong D. Prevalence and morphology of multiple roots, root canals and C-shaped canals in mandibular premolars from cone-beam computed tomography images in a Thai population. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(1):201-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Shetty A, Hegde MN, Tahiliani D, Shetty H, Bhat GT, Shetty S. A three-dimensional study of variations in root canal morphology using cone-beam computed tomography of mandibular premolars in a South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(8):22-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod. 1986;12(8):343-45. [crossref]
36.
Chen YC, Tsai CL, Chen YC, Chen G, Yang SF. A cone-beam computed tomography study of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second premolars in a Taiwan Chinese subpopulation. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117(12):1086-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Singh S, Pawar M. Root canal morphology of South asian Indian mandibular premolar teeth. J Endod. 2014;40(9):1338-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Felsypremila G, Vinothkumar TS, Kandaswamy D. Anatomic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of posterior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(4):500-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Kamath A, Sugumaran S, Harimaran S. Occurence of number of canals in mandibular second premolars in south Indian population- a retrospective study. Eur J Mol. 2020;7(1):2515-8260.
40.
Natanasabapathy V, Rajesh PS, Ashritha MCV, Mishra A, Namasivayam A, Kandaswamy D, et al. Root canal isthmi and interorifice distance in human permanent teeth of an Indian subpopulation using cone.beam computed tomography: A retrospective cross-sectional study. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23:563-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Morphometric observation on root canals of human premolars. J Endod.1977;3(2):74-79. [crossref]
42.
Hatem AA. Canal configuration of mandibular first premolars in an Egyptian population. J Adv Res. 2013;4(2):123-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972;33(1):101-10. [crossref]
44.
Khedmat S, Assadian H, Saravani AA. Root canal morphology of the mandibular first premolars in an Iranian population using cross-sections and radiography. J Endod. 2010;36:214-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
45.
Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod J. 2002;28(4):324-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
46.
Ahmed HMA, Versiani MA, De Deus G, Dummer PMHA. New system for classifying root and root canal morphology. Int Endod J. 2016;50(8):761-70. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

10.7860/JCDR/2021/48413.15106

Date of Submission: Jan 07, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Mar 16, 2021
Date of Acceptance: May 15, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2021

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 08, 2021
• Manual Googling: May 14, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jun 01, 2021 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com