Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 111149

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2021 | Month : July | Volume : 15 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC21 - EC25 Full Version

Expression of Carbonic Anhydrase-IX and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Renal Cell Carcinoma and their Prognostic Significance


Published: July 1, 2021 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/48197.15130
Moumita Maiti, Ranu Sarkar, Aritra Bhattacharya, Prasenjit Sen Ray

1. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Demonstrator, Department of Community Medicine, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Demonstrator, Department of Pathology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Prasenjit Sen Ray,
Demonstrator, Department of Pathology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: psenray@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is the most common adult renal malignancy. Histopathologically, clear cell RCC accounts for 65-70% of all RCCs. Carbonic Anhydrase-IX (CA-IX) is a transmembrane protein and takes a role in cancer development and progression. A 75-100% clear cell RCCs show CA-IX expression. But this varies with grade and stage of tumour. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is responsible for tumour angiogenesis and expressed variedly in RCCs. Both VEGF and CA-IX expression is mediated by Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α (HIF-1α).

Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the expression of CA-IX and VEGF in respect to different grades and stages of RCC and assessing their prognostic significance.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational study done on 45 histopathogically diagnosed cases of RCC. It was performed in the Department of Pathology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Banglore, India over a period of two years (February 2018 to January 2020). Expression of VEGF and CA-IX were studied by immunohistochemistry. Results were analysed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 16.0) using Pearson Chi-square test. A p-value of <0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results: Out of 45 cases of RCC, 34 tumours (32 clear cell carcinoma and two multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential) were evaluated for CA-IX immuno expression. About 25 cases showed CA-IX positivity which inversely associated with grade and stage of RCC (p-value <0.05). The CA-IX had a diagnostic value in detecting clear cell RCC with sensitivity 73.53%, specificity 100% and accuracy 80%. With 28 (62.2%) cases of RCC showed VEGF positivity among which nine were VEGF 1+ and 19 cases VEGF 2+. The VEGF expression showed a positive association with the grade and Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage of tumour (p-value <0.05). Finally, authors found a statistically significant inverse association between CA-IX and VEGF expression in RCCs with clear cell morphology including clear cell RCC and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (p-value=0.001).

Conclusion: High grade RCCs show low expression of CA-IX and strong positivity with VEGF. Both these markers have a prognostic significance. From the therapeutic point of view, VEGF positive tumours, especially inoperable and metastatic cases, may be benefited by anti-VEGF therapy whereas CA-IX positive tumours respond well by treatment with Interleukin-2.

Keywords

Angiogenesis, Cancer, Immunohistochemistry, Kidney, Targeted therapy

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) data (2012), kidney cancer was the 9th most common cancer in men and 14th most common in women with a male:female ratio of 2:1; it was the 16th most common cause of death from cancer worldwide (1). Approximately, one-third of all patients present with metastasis and 50% develop recurrence even after complete surgical excision (2). Due to resistance of RCC to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormonal therapy, it carries a poor prognosis among all urologic malignancies. Common histopathological subtypes of RCC in adults are clear cell RCC, papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma, multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, etc.

Clear cell RCC accounts for 65-70% of all renal cancers (3). They are associated with inactivation of the Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumour suppressor gene and upregulation of HIF-1α. This induces expression of hypoxia inducible genes like CA-IX and VEGF (3),(4). The CA-IX is a transmembrane protein having a role in carbon dioxide transport and intracellular pH regulation. This was first identified in the cervical carcinoma cell line HeLa in 1992 (5). It is expressed in diffuse membranous pattern in 75-100% of clear cell RCCs and has a critical role in cancer development and progression (3),(6). The CA-IX expression has been identified as possible immunohistochemical predictor of RCC patient outcome although reduced expression is seen in high grade cases and basolateral positivity in clear cell papillary RCC (7),(8).

The VEGF is a dimeric glycoprotein and plays an important role in tumour angiogenesis. Increased expression of VEGF is associated with high nuclear grade and stage of tumour (3),(9). Additionally, over expression of VEGF is associated with HIF-1α. In this background, this study was undertaken with the objectives of assessing expression of CA-IX and VEGF in RCC, and thereafter finding their association with prognostic parameters, viz., tumour grade, Lymphovascular Space Invasion (LVSI) and tumour stage.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional, observational study done in the Department of Pathology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata over a period of two years from February 2018 to January 2020, in collaboration with Department of Urology. Necessary approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained for this purpose (NO/NMC/1521).

Inclusion criteria: Total 45 cases of partial or radical nephrectomy specimens received from Department of Urology with confirmed histopathological diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Histopathological diagnosis of malignancies other than RCC, benign renal tumours and non neoplastic lesions were excluded from the study.

Histopathology and Immunohistochemical Interpretation

Gross examination of the specimens and histopathological reporting was done as per the College of American Pathology protocol 2017 (CAP protocol 2017) (10). After diagnosis of RCC on Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained sections, histological type, nuclear grade, presence of LVSI, regional lymph node status and pathological stage were assessed. The nuclear grading was done as per World Health Organisation/International Society of Urologic Pathologists (WHO/ISUP) criteria of 2013 (10).

Immunohistochemistry was performed on all cases of RCC using sections from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of tumours. For VEGF, monoclonal rabbit antibody (RTU clone: RBT-VEGF Bio-SB) was used and sections of lobular capillary haemangioma were taken as positive control. The VEGF expression was interpreted in the form of three-tiered scoring as described by Yildiz E et al. (11) in which,

Score 0 = No staining of tumour cells.

Score 1+ = Membranous stain with no cytoplasmic stain or light cytoplasmic stain in some tumour cells (< 50%).

Score 2+ = Diffuse and strong membranous and cytoplasmic stain in most of the tumour cells (>50%).

While assessing CA-IX immunostaining, monoclonal rabbit antibody (CA-IX: EP 151 clone) was utilised. Normal kidney tissue adjacent to the tumour was taken as internal control while sections of cervical squamous cell carcinoma were used as positive control. The interpretation was done on the basis of degree of cell membrane positivity as described by Genega EM et al., where intensity of staining was scored on the scale of 0 to 3 (12). But high score was regarded as >85% positivity (2+) and low score as <85% positivity (1+) irrespective of intensity of stain.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software (version 16.0). At first frequency distribution tables were prepared. Pearson Chi-square test was done to assess the association between different variables of this study. A p-value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

In this study, total 45 cases of RCC were studied among which 32 cases (71.1%) were clear cell carcinoma, nine cases (20%) papillary carcinoma, two cases each (4.4%) of collecting duct carcinoma and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (Table/Fig 1) a,b, (Table/Fig 2) a,b, (Table/Fig 3) a,b]. The study population had male:female ratio of 2:1. A 55.6% cases were left-sided and 68.9% cases showed presence of LVSI.

The most common WHO/ISUP grade amongst all cases were grade 2 (40% cases) and pT-stage was pT3 (48.9% cases). A 26.7% cases showed lymph node metastasis (pN1 stage) while 15.6% cases had distant metastasis (M1 stage).

The VEGF immunostaining was done on all 45 cases of RCC. Majority of the tumours were VEGF 2+ positive (19 cases, 42.2%). A statistically significant positive association was observed between VEGF expression (staining intensity) and WHO/ISUP grade (p-value <0.05) as well as pT stage (p-value=0.002). There was also a statistically significant association with presence of LVSI (p-value <0.001), lymph node metastasis (pN stage) (p-value=0.002) and distant metastasis (M stage) (p-value=0.003) (Table/Fig 4)a-c, (Table/Fig 5).

The CA-IX immunostaining was done in all 45 cases of RCC. All nine cases of papillary RCC and two cases of collecting duct carcinoma were CA-IX negative irrespective of grade and stage. Among remaining 34 cases, including clear cell RCC (32 cases) and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (two cases) which showed clear cell morphology, 25 cases were CA-IX positive. So, during statistical evaluation between grade, pathological Tumour -Node-Metastasis (pTNM) stage, LVSI and CA-IX expression in tumour cells 11 cases (with histological diagnosis of papillary RCC and collecting duct carcinoma) were excluded. Instead of the evaluation of prognostic parameters was restricted to 34 cases of RCC with CA-IX expression.

Out of 34 cases of RCC, seven cases had nuclear grade 4 of which six tumours showed CA-IX negativity and one was CA-IX 1+. Whereas among 14 grade 2 RCC, 11 (78.6%) showed CA-IX 2+, two (14.3%) with CA-IX 1+ and one (7.1%) case CA-IX negative negative (Table/Fig 6)a-d. A significant inverse association was seen between CA-IX expression and grade of RCC (p-value <0.001) (Table/Fig 7). LVSI was seen in 25 out of 34 cases; among these nine cases were CA-IX negative, nine cases CA-IX 1+ and only seven cases CA-IX 2+. Out of nine cases of RCC without LVSI, eight cases expressed CA-IX 2+. So, the authors observed loss of CA-IX expression with presence of LVSI and it was statistically significant (p-value=0.006).

Upon associating pTNM stage of 34 RCC cases with CA-IX expression, all seven cases in pT1 stage showed CA-IX 2+ positivity. On the other hand, among nine cases of pT4 stage, five were CA-IX negative, three CA-IX 1+ and 1 case CA-IX 2+. One case out of seven cases of pT2 stage and three cases out of 11 cases with pT3 stage did not show CA-IX expression. Here, the authors deduced that pT-stage and CA-IX positivity had an inverse association which was statistically significant (p-value=0.038). Among these 34 RCC cases, six cases had lymph node metastasis (pN1 stage). Of these six N1 stage cases, five did not express CA-IX; whereas among 28 cases of pN0 stage, only four cases were CA-IX negative and rest were CA-IX positive. Here also, statistically significant inverse association between pN-stage and CA-IX expression (p-value=0.002) was found. Among six cases with distant metastasis (M1 stage), five cases (83.3%) were CA-IX negative. But only four (14.3%) out of 28 cases of M0 stage showed CA-IX negativity. Again, distant metastatic potential of RCC and CA-IX expression demonstrated inverse association which was statistically significant (p-value=0.002) (Table/Fig 7).

Overall, CA-IX has a sensitivity 73.53%, specificity 100% and accuracy 80% in immunohistochemical diagnosis of clear cell RCC.

Finally, the authors noted that with gradual increase in degree of expression of VEGF there was a simultaneous gradual decrease in degree of CA-IX expression (Table/Fig 8). This inverse association between VEGF and CA-IX had a strong statistical significance (p-value=0.001).

Discussion

The RCC is notorious for showing unpredictable biological behaviour and clinical outcome (1),(13). Computed-tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging are good diagnostic modalities in suspected adult renal masses. However, core needle biopsy in expert hands has been shown to provide adequate diagnostic material in 80% of cases additionally providing material for immunohistochemistry (14),(15). In low stage tumours some centres opt for partial nephrectomy without biopsy for preserving the rest of the kidney (16).

Recent identification of some molecular markers in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of RCC are expected to play an important role both in surgically resectable and non resectable cases. In this study immunohistochemistry for VEGF was done in all RCC cases to assess association between its expression and different prognostic parameters in an attempt to propose anti-VEGF therapy to VEGF positive cases. The CA-IX is characteristically expressed in diffuse cytoplasmic membranous distribution in 75-100% of clear cell RCCs, although high grade tumours have less expression (3). It may be noted that this study has assessed the expression of CA-IX only in RCC with clear cell morphology and associated it with grade, stage and other prognostic parameters.

The present study found CA-IX positivity in 73.6% of all clear cell RCC cases among which 44.2% showed high expression and 29.4% showed low expression. 26.4% of clear cell RCCs were CA-IX negative and most of these had high WHO/ISUP grade. No case of RCC other than clear cell carcinoma and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential were CA-IX positive. Genega EM et al., and Liao SY et al., have also stated similar findings (12),(17). Leibovich BC et al., and Ebru T et al., have detected high CA-IX expression in >70% of clear cell RCC cases (18),(19). This study also observed a negative association between CA-IX expression and WHO/ISUP grade of clear cell RCC, i.e., expression of CA-IX is decreased in high grade tumours (p-value <0.001). These results are consistent with those of Genega EM et al., and Leibovich BC et al., (12),(18). Regarding the CA-IX expression and pTNM stage of the clear cell RCC, a statistically significant negative association was found separately with pT-stage (p-value=0.038), pN-stage (p-value=0.002) and M-stage (p-value=0.002). Although the studies of Genega EM et al., and Leibovich BC et al., did not show any significant association in these two parameters, Bui MH et al., showed a statistically significant association between CA-IX expression and stage of tumour (12), (18), (20). In this study, out of 34 cases of clear cell RCC, 25 had LVSI and only seven cases among those showed high expression of CA-IX. Simultaneously, an inverse association between presence of LVSI and CA-IX expression (p-value=0.006) was also noted. To the authors’ knowledge, similar finding has not been appreciated in any study. So, it may be derived that CA-IX is not only a highly specific immunohistochemical marker for clear cell RCC, but also its low or negative expression is a predictor of worse outcome.

In the present study, VEGF positivity was seen in 62.2% cases of RCC while 37.8% were VEGF negative; 42.2 % RCC showed strong VEGF expression (2+). These findings are corroborating with those of Ebru T et al., and Yang S et al., (19), (21). The authors noted a statistically significant positive association between WHO/ISUP grade of RCC and VEGF expression (p-value <0.001). Expression of VEGF was seen to increase significantly with increasing TNM stage of tumours, separately with pT-stage (p-value=0.002), pN-stage (p-value=0.002) and M stage (p-value=0.003). These observations were concordant with those of Ebru T et al., (19). So, it can be predicted that high VEGF expression is associated with poor prognosis. This study also revealed CA-IX expression to be inversely associated with VEGF expression, a finding that is statistically significant (p-value=0.001). Phuoc NB et al., had published similar observations (22).

As RCC is seldom responsive to radiotherapy or chemotherapy, targeted molecular therapy has a great role to play especially in surgically non resectable tumours and metastatic diseases. Anti-VEGF antibody may be useful in VEGF expressive RCC, viz., Bevacizumab, Sorafenib and Sunitinib. Another mode of molecular therapy is with high dose Interleukin-2 (IL-2). Unfortunately, long lasting responses are low and high dose IL-2 has significant side effects. So, selection of patients for this therapy is very important (23). Bui MH et al., stated that response rate of IL-2 therapy was higher (27%) in patients with CA-IX high expressing tumours than in CA-IX low expressing tumours (14%) (20).

Limitation(s)

The authors acknowledge the inherent limitations of this study owing to small sample size and limited duration of observation, cases confined to one geographic region and that too at single institute. Therefore, they propose further multi-institutional studies with larger number of cases over longer duration with scope of follow-up to provide better information about the subject matter.

Conclusion

The CA-IX is a specific immunohistochemical marker for diagnosing clear cell RCC particularly in small biopsies. Its expression is inversely associated with grade and stage of tumours. On the other hand VEGF expression is positively associated with grade and stage of all RCCs. So, we can say that CA-IX negative and VEGF strongly positive tumours definitely carry poor prognosis. Both the markers have therapeutic importance also. All VEGF positive RCCs which are surgically non resectable or presented with metastasis may be benefited by anti-VEGF therapy. Such cases of clear cell RCC which are VEGF negative but CA-IX positive can be treated with IL-2 to prolong the survival.

References

1.
Moch H, Amin MB, Argani P, Cheville J, Delahunt B, et al. Renal cell tumors Introduction. In: Moch H, Humphrey P, Ulbright TE, Reuter VE, eds. WHO classification of Tumours of Urinary System and Male Genital Organs; 4th edition, Lyon: IARC Press, 2016:14-17.
2.
Lam JS, Leppert JT, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Survillence following radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Curr Urol Rep. 2005;6(1):07-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Moch H, Bosnib SM, Delahunt B, Eble J, Egevad L, Grignon DJ, et al. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma. In: Moch H, Humphrey P, Ulbright TE, Reuter VE, eds. WHO classification of Tumours of Urinary System and Male Genital Organs; 4th edition, Lyon: IARC Press, 2016:18-21.
4.
Rini BI, Small EJ: Biology and clinical development of vascular endothelial growth factor- Targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(5):1028-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Pastorekova S, Zavadova Z, Kostal M, Babusikova O, Zavada J. A novel quasi-viral agent, Ma Tu, is a two component system. Virology. 1992;187(2):620-26. [crossref]
6.
Thiry A, Donge JM, Masereel B, Supuran CT. Targeting tumour associated carbonic anhydrase IX in cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006;27(11):566-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Signoretti S, Regan M, Atkin M. Cabonic anhydrase IX as a predictive biomarker of response to kidney cancer therapy. BJU Int. 2008;101(Suppl4):31-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Gupta AK, Balzer B, Picken M, Osunkoya AO, Shet T, Alsabeh R, et al. Diagnostic implication of transcription factor PAX 2protein and transmembrane enzyme complex carbonic anhydrase-IX immunoreactivity in adult renal epithelial neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(2):241-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Wiesener MS, Munchenhagen PM, Berger I. Constitutive activation of hypoxia inducible genes related to overexpression of hypoxia inducible factor-1α in clear cell carcinomas. Cancer Research. 2003;61(13):5215-22.
10.
Shrigley JR, Zhou M, Allan R, Amin MB, Campbell SC, Chang A, et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with invasive carcinoma of renal tubular origin. College of American Pathologists. 2017;4.0.1.0:1-15.
11.
Yildiz E, Gorkce G, Kilicarslan H, Ayan S, Goze OF, Gultekin AY. Prognostic value of the expression of Ki67, CD44 and vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel invasion in renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2004;93(7):1087-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Genega EM, Ghebremichael M, Najarian R, Fu Y, Wang Y, Agrani P, et al. Carbonic Anhydrase-IX expression in Renal Neoplasms; Correlation with tumor type and grade. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134(6):873-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. (8th edition). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017. [crossref]
14.
Gettman MT, Blute ML, Spotts B, Byrant SC, Zincke H. Pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma: Significance of tumor classification with the 1997 TNM staging system. Cancer. 2001;91(2):354-61. 3.0.CO;2-9>[crossref]
15.
Hartge P, Struewing JP, Wacholder S, Brody LC, Tucker MA. The prevalence of common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation among Ashkenazi Jews. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64(4):963-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, Baker SM, Berlin M, McAdams M, et al. The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi jews. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(20):1401-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Liao SY, Aurelio ON, Jan K, Zavada J, Stanbridge EJ. Identification of the MN/CA-IX protein as a reliable diagnostic biomarker of clear cell carcinoma of kidney. Cancer Res. 1997;57(14):2827-31.
18.
Leibovich BC, Sheinin Y, Lohse CM, Thompson RH, Cheville JC, Zavada J, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX is not an independent predictor of outcome for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(30):4757-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Ebru T, Fulya OP, Hakan A, Vuslat YC, Necdet S, Nuray C, et al. Analysis of various potential and prognostic markers and survival data in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Intl Braz J Urol. 2017;43(3): 440-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Bui MH, Seligson D, Han KR, Pantuck AJ, Dorey FJ, Huang Y, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX is an independent predictor of survival in advanced renal clear cell carcinoma: Implication for prognosis and therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(2):802-11.
21.
Yang S, Gao Q, Jiang W. Relationship between tumour angiogenesis and expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A in human renal cell carcinoma. J Int Med Res. 2015;43(1):110-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Phuoc NB, Ehara H, Gotoh T, Nakano M, Kamei S, Deguchi T, et al. Prognostic value of the co-expression of carbonic anhydrase IX and VEGF in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2008;20(3):525-30.
23.
Atkins M, Regan M, Mcdermott D, Mier J, Stanbridge E, Youmans A, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX expression predicts outcome of IL-2 therapy for renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(10):3714-21. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

10.7860/JCDR/2021/48197.15130

Date of Submission: Dec 22, 2020
Date of Peer Review: Jan 29, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Apr 28, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2021

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 23, 2020
• Manual Googling: Apr 27, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jun 04, 2021 (00%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com