Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 309262

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : August | Volume : 6 | Issue : 6 | Page : 938 - 942 Full Version

A Study on Effects of Meditation on Sympathetic Nervous System Functional Status in Meditators


Published: August 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2297
Desh Deepak, Anant Narayan Sinha, Vimal Singh Gusain, Ashish Goel

1. Associate Professor, Deptment of Physiology, VCSG Govt Medical Sciences and Research Institute, Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Deptment of Physiology, VCSG Govt Medical Sciences and Research Institute, Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India. 3 Assistant Professor, Deptment of Physiology, VCSG Govt Medical Sciences and Research Institute, Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India. 4 Assistant Professor, Deptment of Physiology, SRMS Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, UP, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Desh Deepak
Associate Professor,Deptment of Physiology,
VCSG Govt Medical Sciences and Research,
Institute, Srinagar,Pin 246176 Uttarakhand, India.
Phone: 9410932909
E-mail: Deshdeepak_s@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Objective: Meditation has long been known to affect human physiology through autonomic nervous system. This study was designed to assess sympathetic autonomic functional status of meditators of various age groups.

Material and Methods: Three clinical tests, Isometric handgrip test,Cold pressor test and Valsalva Meneuver were studied in 25 meditators of age ranging from 25 to 75 years. The results were compared with those observed in 25 non-meditators of matching age and socio economic status.

Observation and Results: The basal cardiac parameters viz heart rate and blood pressure were uniformly lower in meditators than non meditators in all age groups, more so in senior meditators. On performing isometric handgrip test, non-meditators developed significant increase in blood pressure and heart rate during gripping than that seen in meditators. In cold pressor test, as compared to non-meditators, mediators showed blunted increase in blood pressure along with returning of blood pressure to basal level earlier, which indicated presence of controlled sympathetic drive in meditators. In Valsalva maneuver the overshoot of BP was lower in meditators than in non meditators.

Conclusion: It can be concluded that the regular practice of meditation initially blunted the sympathetic drive and later on developed control over sympathetic function of meditators.

Keywords

Meditation Cold Pressor test, Isometric Handgrip Dynamometry, Valsalva maneuver Meditators

INTRODUCTION
A common essential feature of various spiritual traditions is the intuitive knowledge of close connection between mind and the body, which may possibly be achieved by the techniques like Meditation, Yoga etc. Meditation is basically a family of many techniques, each of which is involved in the conscious and voluntary efforts, to focus the attention of the meditator. It is an activity that keeps the attention pleasantly anchored in the present moment. Meditation has always been a subject of intense exploration amongst scientists. The physiology of meditation differs from that of ordinary rest with eyes closed and from that of most hypnotic states. Further, during meditation, deep physiological relaxation, somewhat similar to that occurring in the “deepest” Non-Rapid-Eye-Movement (NREM) sleep phase occurs in a context of wakefulness (1),(2).

A vast complexity of biological organization indicates that the physiological responses to meditation probably occurs on a multidimensional, interactive basis. Further, meditation produces specific neural activation patterns involving decreased limbic arousal in the brain, which in turn results in reduced stress and increased autonomic stability (3),(4).Different clinical reflexes are practiced to assess autonomic functions in clinical conditions like borderline hypertension and diabetes mellitus (5),(6). Some scientists have demonstrated the effects of meditation on parameters like Galvanic Skin Resistance (GSR) and EDR only (2) but attempt to assess functioning of autonomic nervous system in meditators by using different clinical reflexes are still lacking. So the present study was aimed to assess the autonomic functional status in mediators by using such techniques.

Material and Methods

Present study was carried out in the department of Physiology,SectionHimalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Ram Nagar, Dehra Dun, Uttaranchal, India. Out of fifty male subjects, 25-75 years of age, who volunteered, twenty five were asymptomatic meditators (from Yogoda Satsanga Dhyana Mandali Dehradun) and rest twenty five were non–meditators of similar age, and physical activity. From each meditator a detailed history of meditation practices was recorded with special reference to duration, numbers of meditation sessions per day, and the age at which the meditation practice was started.

Following clinical reflexes were performed to assess autonomic functional status: 1. Isometric hand grip Dynamometry (5): On a sustained hand grip at 30% of maximum voluntary capacity for 15 sec, parameters i.e. Heart Rate (HR) and Blood Pressure (BP), were recorded just before the release of hand grip, after 1 minand 5 minutes of grip release. 2. Cold Pressor test (7): It was performed in sitting posture, while left hand (upto first crease at wrist) was immersed in cold water at 8 degree Celsius for 2 min. Parameters were recorded during immersion and after 1and 5 minutes of removing hand from cold water. 3. Valsalva maneuver (7): With nostrils closed and after forceful blow into the tube of aneroid manometer, subject held it at 40 mmHg for 15 sec. RR intervals were observed to determine Valsalva Ratio. (Valsalva Ratio being the ratio of longest RR interval during 1 minute after the strain and shortest RR interval during the strain.) • Each test was performed after a resting period of 10 minutes, in supine or sitting position. • The heart rate (HR) was measured from the R-R interval of ECG using Lead II of Electrocardiograph machine (BPL Cardiart 108). Blood Pressure was recorded byusing an electronic BP apparatus (National, Japan). Handgrip strength was measured by using a handgrip Dynamometer. • The data obtained were subjected to appropriate statistical analysis using Microsoft Excel software. The one tail student ‘t’ test was applied for the analysis.

Results

All the subjects of both groups were divided into 3 groups of (25-40 years), (41-55 years) and (56 years onwards). Accordingly the non meditators were groped as A,B,C and meditators as group D,E,F. The duration of meditation in years as well as in the hours per day was in direct proportion to the increasing age of meditators. Basal Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: (Table/Fig 1).

In non-meditators basal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) were lowest in group A and higher in older subjects (group B and group C). While in meditators SBP was similar in all the three groups (group D, E, F), while DBP was higher in group E and group F than in group D. Heart rate (HR) increased gradually in non meditators with age, while in meditators it was lower in group E and group F.Inter group comparison showed that basal SBP, DBP and HR were statistically significantly (p=.025) lower in meditators than in non- meditators of corresponding age groups especially in group F than in group C. However this difference was statistically more signifiTheduration of meditation in years as well as in the hours per day was in direct proportion to the increasing age of meditators. Basal Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: (Table/Fig 1).

In non-meditators basal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) were lowest in group A and higher in older subjects (group B and group C). While in meditators SBP was similar in all the three groups (group D, E, F), while DBP was higher in group E and group F than in group D. Heart rate (HR) increased gradually in non meditators with age, while in meditators it was lower in group E and group F.Inter group comparison showed that basal SBP, DBP and HR were statistically significantly (p=.025) lower in meditators than in non- meditators of corresponding age groups especially in group F than in group C. However this difference was statistically more significant (p=.001) in senior meditators. Study of basal parameters was followed by different test mentioned above (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

Bodily responses following meditation may vary, depending upon the age, sex and duration of meditation (8). In initial phase of meditation, a regular practice of the relaxation response is believed to establish a hypometabolic state of parasympathetic dominance in meditators, which continually resets the level of metabolic functioning to a lower rate. It has been seen that people who have been meditating for years/decades, show marked differences in both their physiological response and their ability to control their own physiology compared with meditators who have only been practicing meditation for a short time. Hence it has been stressed that physiological effects of meditation are mediated through autonomic nervous system (9),(10).In present study, both SBP and DBP increased with advancing of age in non-meditators. Such changes are attributed to the effect of ageing as reported earlier on non-hypertensive patients (11),(12).

On the other hand in meditators SBP, DBP and HR showed almost similar values in all the three groups, and statistically significant (p=.001) lower BP and HR was observed in Group F than in corresponding age group C of non-meditators. The probable cause of lowest HR in Group F may be improved vagal tone, as a result of meditative practices of a longer duration.The present study points out significant lower basal SBP and DBP and HR in meditators than non-meditators. However the rise in SBP and DBP and HR on sustained handgrip was highly significantly higher (p=.005) in all groups of non-meditators which may be due to greater sympathetic drive in non-meditators as reported by Mark et al (13) in normal subjects.

Variations in DBP is a more sensitive and specific to diagnose autonomic disorders (14). The rise of DBP was found to be statistically significantly lower (p.064) during the period of sustained grip in meditators than in non-meditators with more significant in senior meditators of group F (Table/Fig 5). In addition, the rise of SBP and Heart Rate also showed a more statistically significant (p.001) lower values in all groups of meditators and their levels were observed even lower that pretest valus after release of handgrip (Table/Fig 1).The comparatively smaller rise of SBP, DBP and HR on sustained grip in meditators indicates the presence of lower sympathetic drive in them supporting the hypothesis of enhanced control on sympathetic drive by meditative techniques.

The cold pressor test is a measure of sympathetic activity.In resting state both SBP and DBP were statistically significantly lower (p=.001) in meditators than non-meditators . In addition heart rate was also found to be statistically significant lower (p.05), especially in meditators in group F. However, in non-meditators the rise in SBP and DBP was increased statistically significant following cold pressor test in all groups and returned to normal in 5 minutes. In meditators, there was statistically significant increase in DBP in group D only; indicating pronounced sympathetic response similar to that seen in non-meditators. On the other hand, in group F meditators, there was no significant increase in DBP and HR, depicting reduced sympathetic response in senior meditators (Table/Fig 2).

These findings along with other findings of this study with different autonomic tests, indicate a decline in sympathetic drive in the senior meditators . Further it was seen that in meditators the SBP, DBP and HR returned to normal earlier than that seen in non-meditators suggesting less sympathetic drive in meditators more so with increase in meditating duration as seen in senior meditators. On straining during valsalva maneuver, the overshoot of SBP was significantly (p) lower in meditators in comparison to non-meditators. This was still lower in senior meditators of subjects in group F. All parameters returned to near normal within 5 minutes in all groups but in group F, it reached to a lower value than the pretest levels (Table/Fig 3). It suggests that the sympathetic activity waslower in meditators than non-meditators and especially so with long duration practitioners.

It can be concluded that meditative techniques may affect the autonomic activity significantly creating a balance in favour of parasympathetic nervous system but the effects requires a long term continuation of the technique. Changes in autonomic activity might help in reducing psychosomatic disorders and general well being of an individual.

References

1.
Brown SW, Blodgett J. EEG Kappa rhythms during Transcendental meditation and possible perceptual threshold changes. In: D Kanellakos editor. The Psychobiology of Transcendental meditation: A Literature Review. Menlo Park (California): WA. Benjamin 1974.
2.
Wallace RK, Benson H, Wilson AF. A wakeful hypometabolic physiologic state. Am J Physiol 1971; 221: 795-99.
3.
Jooyoung JS. The physiology of meditation http:// www.dctkd.org/. 1997.
4.
Schwartz G. Biofeedback, self regulation and the patterning of physiological processes. American Scientist 1975; 63: 314-24.
5.
Mahajan SK, Mahajan KK, Gupta JP. Autonomic reflexes in borderline hypertensives. JAPI 1990; 38:784 – 86.
6.
Clarke BF, Ewing DJ, Campbell IW. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetologia 1979; 17: 195.
7.
King MS, Carr T, DCruz C. Transcendental meditation, hypertension and heart disease. Aust Fam Physician 2002; 31:164-68.
8.
Shapiro DH. Meditation: Clinical and health related applications. The Western J of Medicine1981; 134: 45.
9.
Jevning R, Wallace RK, Beidebach M. A wakeful hypometabolic integrated response. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1992; 16: 415–24.
10.
Patel C, Marmot MG, Terry DJ, Carruthers M, Hunt B, Patel M. Trial of relaxation in reducing coronary risk: four year follow up. BMJ 1985; 290: 1103-06.
11.
Sarnoff SJ, Hardenbergh E, Whittenberger JL. Mechanism of arterial pressure response to the Valsalva test. Am J Physiol 1948; 154: 316.
12.
Wasir HS, Reybrouck T, Linjen P, Engard R, Conway J, Amery A. The effect of ageing on systolic arterial pressure and related variables in apparently normal subjects. In: Nathobhai and Padam Singhvi editors. Proceeding of the International Congress on Hypertension Bombay: Hoecht 1977; 259.
13.
Mark AL, Victor RG, Nerhed C, Wallin BG. Microneurographic studies of the mechanism of the sympathetic nerve responses to static exercise in humans. Circ Res 1985; 57: 461-69.
14.
Khurana RK, Setty A. The value of the isometric handgrip test – studies in various autonomic disorders. Clin Auton Res.1996; 6: 211-18.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4293:2297

Date of Submission: Mar 17, 2012
Date of Peer Review: Apr 01, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Apr 18, 2012
Date of Publishing: Aug 10, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com