Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 20859

AbstractReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Dentistry
Year : 2012 | Month : August | Volume : 6 | Issue : 6 | Page : 1120 - 1123 Full Version

Improving the Palliative and the Supportive Care in Cancer Patients


Published: August 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2348
Sunit Kr. Jurel, Ramashanker, Raghuwar D. Singh, Durga Shanker Gupta

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, C.S.M. Medical University UP, Lucknow, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, C.S.M. Medical University UP, Lucknow, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, C.S.M. Medical University UP, Lucknow, India. 4. Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sunit kr. Jurel, M.D.S., Assistant Professor
c/o Er. R.B. Singh 18/373 Indira Nagar, Lucknow (UP), India.
E-mail: dentistmj1110@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

The quality of life (QL) in oral cancer patients has become one of the most important parameters worth considering, in the diagnosis and the post-treatment follow-up. The purpose of this article was to review the papers which were published on the studies which were done on the QL in oral cancer patients, the clinical results which were obtained, and the systematic revisions which were available in the indexed literature for the last 10 years. The term QL has appeared as a keyword in an increasing number of articles throughout the past 10 years; however, only few studies had focused on oral cancer. Most of them had assessed all the head and neck cancers, which conformed to a heterogeneous group with several different features, depending on the location of the cancer (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx, nasopharynx and the salivary glands). Most of the studies evaluate the QL in short periods of time, normally within the first year after the diagnosis. The data which are related to the QL are mostly related to the patient (age, sex, co-morbidity, etc), the tumour (location and size), and the treatment (surgical treatment, radiotherapy association, reconstruction, cervical dissection, and/or feeding tube). Nowadays, the assessment of the QL is considered as an essential component of an oral cancer patient, as well as of the survival, morbidity and the years which are free of disease. Although many aspects which are related to the QL in oral cancer patients have been published throughout the past 10 years, more systematic research is needed to be able to apply it on a daily basis.

Keywords

Quality of Life, Oral Cancer, Oral Cavity

Introduction
The surgical treatment for cancer of the oral cavity has an important effect on the quality of life, which has been defined as the perceived discrepancy between the actual status and the ideal standard of the patient (1). From the time of the diagnosis, the quality of life for every cancer patient and survivor is affected in some way or the other. The American Cancer Society has identified 4 quality of life factors that affect cancer patients and their families. These factors are social, psychological, physical and spiritual. Aesthetics and functional sequelae which are caused by surgical incisions and cancer resections, which are often associated with pre or post operative radiotherapy, always modify the patient’s self perception and their ability to interact with others in the daily social life. While the body scars and alterations are usually hidden during the social activities, and dramatic situations such as a permanent colostomy or a vascular shunt for dialysis can be easily managed in public, the head and neck cancer patients cannot hide the post treatment functional changes and they must therefore, deal with the subsequent negative impact on their self-esteem and confidence in all the realms (2).

This study aimed at evaluating the changes in the quality of life from the pre-operative levels during the 12 month post-operative period by using specific questionnaires of well known acceptability, responsiveness, and validity, with a social emphasis and domains such as chewing, swallowing, speech, and disfigurement. Moreover, the impact on the quality of life of different factors such as gender, mandibular and tongue resection, pre and post-operative radiotherapy and the type of reconstruction was statistically evaluated.

ROLE OF THE PRETREATMENT ORAL CARE
A thorough oral evaluation by a knowledgeable dentist before the cancer treatment begins is important for the success of the regimen. The pretreatment oral care achieves the following: • It reduces the risk and the severity of the oral complications. • It allows a prompt identification and treatment of the existing infections or other problems. • It improves the likelihood for the patient to successfully complete the planned cancer treatment. • It prevents, eliminates, or reduces the oral pain. • It minimizes the oral infections that could lead to potentially serious systemic infections. • It prevents or minimizes the complications that compromise the nutrition. • It prevents or reduces the later incidence of bone necrosis. • It preserves or improves the oral health. • It provides an opportunity for the patient’s education about oral hygiene during the cancer therapy. • It improves the quality of life. • It decreases the cost of care.

With a pre-treatment oral evaluation, the dental team can identify and treat problems such as infections, fractured teeth or restorations, or periodontal disease that could contribute to oral complications when the cancer therapy begins (3). The evaluation also establishes the baseline data for comparing the patient’s status in the subsequent examinations.

Before starting the treatment, one will need to obtain the patient’s cancer diagnosis and treatment plan and their medical history, and dental history. An open communication with the patient’soncologists is essential to ensure that each provider has the information which is necessary to deliver the best possible care.

Evaluation
Ideally, a comprehensive oral evaluation should take place a month before the cancer treatment starts, to allow adequate time for recovery from any required invasive dental procedures. The pretreatment evaluation includes a thorough examination of the hard and soft tissues, as well as appropriate radiographs to detect the possible sources of infection and the pathology (4). Also, the following steps have to be taken before the cancer treatment begins: • Identify and treat the existing infections, carious and other compromised teeth, and tissue injury or trauma. • Stabilize or eliminate the potential sites of infection. • Extract the teeth in the radiation field that are non-restorable or that may pose a future problem, to prevent extraction-induced osteonecrosis later. • Conduct a prosthodontic evaluation if it is indicated. If a removable prosthesis is worn, make sure that it is clean and well adapted to the tissue. Instruct the patient not to wear the prosthesis during the treatment, if possible; or in the least, not to wear it at night. • Perform an oral prophylaxis if it is indicated. • Delay the oral surgical procedures to allow at least 2 weeks for healing before the radiation therapy begins. For the patients who receive the radiation treatment, this is the best time to consider surgical procedures. Oral surgery should be performed at least 7 to 10 days before the patient receives myelosuppressive chemotherapy. A medical consultation is indicated before starting with invasive procedures. • Remove the orthodontic bands and brackets if highly a stomatotoxic chemotherapy is planned or if the appliances will be in the radiation field. • Consider extracting the highly mobile primary teeth in children, and the teeth that are expected to exfoliate during the treatment. • Prescribe an individualized oral hygiene regimen to minimize the oral complications. The patients who undergo head and neck radiation therapy should be instructed on the use of supplemental fluoride.

Education
Patient education is an integral part of the pre-treatment evaluation and it should include a discussion of the potential oral complications. It is very important that the dental team lay an emphasis on the patient that optimal oral hygiene during the treatment, adequate nutrition, and the avoidance of tobacco and alcohol can prevent or minimize the oral complications. To ensure that the patient fully understands what is required, detailed instructions have to be provided on the specific oral care practices, such as how and when to brush and floss, how to recognize the signs of the complications, and other instructions which are appropriate for the individual. The patients should understand that a good oral care during the cancer treatment contributes to its success. Advice the patients to:- • Brush the teeth, gums, and the tongue gently with an extra-soft toothbrush and a fluoride toothpaste after every meal and before bedtime. If the brushing hurts, the bristles have to be softened in warm water.• Floss the teeth gently every day. If the gums are sore or bleeding, those areas should be avoided but the other teeth should be kept flossed. • Follow the instructions for using fluoride gel. • Avoid mouthwashes which contain alcohol. • Rinse the mouth with a baking soda and a salt solution, followed by a plain water rinse several times a day (use 1/4th teaspoon each of baking soda and salt in 1 quarter of warm water). Avoid salt during mucositis. • Exercise the jaw muscles three times a day to prevent and treat jaw stiffness which is caused by radiation. Open and close the mouth as far as possible without causing pain; repeat 20 times. • Avoid candy, gum, and soda unless they are sugar-free. • Avoid spicy or acidic foods, toothpicks, tobacco products, and alcohol. • Keep the appointment schedule which is recommended by the dentist.

Supplemental Fluoride
Fluoride rinses are not adequate to prevent tooth demineralization. Instead, a high-potency fluoride gel, which is delivered via custom gel-applicator trays, is recommended. Several days before the radiation therapy begins, the patients should start a daily 10-minute application of a 1.1% neutral pH sodium fluoride gel or a 0.4% stannous fluoride (unflavoured) gel (5). Patients with porcelain crowns or resin or glass ionomer restorations should use a neutral pH fluoride. It should be made sure that the trays cover all the tooth structures without irritating the gingival or the mucosal tissues. For the patients who are reluctant to use a tray, a high-potency fluoride gel should be brushed on the teeth following the daily brushing and flossing. Either 1.1% neutral pH sodium or 0.4% stannous fluoride gel is recommended, based on the patient’s type of dental restorations. The patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction must continue lifelong daily fluoride applications.

Instructions for the Patients for Using Supplemental Fluoride: If a tray is being used
• Place a thin ribbon of the fluoride gel in each tray. • Place the trays on the teeth and leave in place for 10 minutes. If the gel oozes out of the tray, you are using too much. • After 10 minutes, remove the trays and spit out any excess gel. Do not rinse. • Rinse the applicator trays with water. • Do not eat or drink for 30 minutes.
If brush-on method is being used
• After brushing with a toothpaste, rinse as usual.

ORAL CARE DURING THE CANCER TREATMENT Careful monitoring of the oral health is especially important during the cancer therapy, to prevent, detect, and to treat the complications as soon as possible. When a treatment is necessary, the oncologistshould be consulted before any dental procedure, which includes the dental prophylaxis. • Examine the soft tissues for inflammation or infection and evaluate them for plaque levels and dental caries. • Review the oral hygiene and the oral care protocols; prescribe an antimicrobial therapy as indicated. • Provide recommendations for treating dry mouth and other complications:  Sip water frequently.  Suck ice chips or sugar-free candy.  Chew sugar-free gum.  Use a saliva substitute spray or gel or a prescribed saliva stimulant if it is appropriate.  Avoid glycerin swabs. • Take precautions to protect against trauma. • Provide topical anaesthetics or analgesics for oral pain.

Other factors to remember
Schedule the dental work carefully: If oral surgery is required, allow at least 7 to 10 days of healing before the patient receives myelosuppressive chemotherapy. An elective oral surgery should not be performed for the duration of the radiation treatment (6). Determine the haematologic status: If the patient is receiving chemotherapy, have the oncology team conduct the blood sample collection 24 hours before the dental treatment to determine whether the patient’s platelet count, clotting factors, and absolute neutrophil count are sufficient to recommend an oral treatment.

Postpone the oral surgery or the other oral invasive procedures if:
• The platelet count is less than 75,000/mm3 or if abnormal clotting factors are present. • The absolute neutrophil count is less than 1,000/mm3 (or consider prophylactic antibiotics).

Consider the oral causes of fever:
Fever of unknown origin may be related to an oral infection. It should be remembered that the oral signs of infection or other complications may be altered by immunosuppression which is related to the chemotherapy.

Evaluate the need for an antibiotic prophylaxis:
If the patient has a central venous catheter, the oncologist should be consulted, to determine whether any antibiotics are needed before any dental treatment, to prevent endocarditis. • Place a thin ribbon of gel on the toothbrush. • Brush for 2 to 3 minutes. • Spit out any excess gel. Do not rinse. • Do not eat or drink for 30 minutes.

THE FOLLOW-UP ORAL CARE
Chemotherapy Once all the complications of the chemotherapy have resolved, the patients may be able to resume their normal dental care schedule. However, if the immune function continues to be compromised, the patient’s hematologic status should be determined before any dental treatment or surgery is initiated (7). This is particularly important to remember, for the patients who have undergone stem cell transplantation. The patient should be asked whether he/she had received an intravenous bisphosphonate therapy.

Radiation therapy
Once the patient has completed the head and neck radiation therapy and after the acute oral complications have abated, the patient should be evaluated regularly (every 4 to 8 weeks, for example) for the first 6 months. There after, one can determine a schedule which is based on the patient’s needs. However, it shouldbe kept in mind that the oral complications can continue or emerge long after the radiation therapy has ended (8).

Points to Remember
• A high-dose radiation treatment carries a lifelong risk of xerostomia, dental caries, and osteonecrosis. • Because of the risk of osteonecrosis, principally in the mandible, the patients should avoid invasive surgical procedures, which include extractions that involve the irradiated bone. If an invasive procedure is required, the use of antibiotics and hyperbaric oxygen therapy before and after the surgery should be considered. • Lifelong daily fluoride application, good nutrition, and the maintenance of oral hygiene are especially important for the patients with salivary gland dysfunction. • The dentures would be needed need to be reconstructed if the treatment had altered the oral tissues. Some people can never wear dentures again because of friable tissues and xerostomia. • The dentists should closely monitor the children who have received radiation to the craniofacial and the dental structures, for abnormal growth and development. • The dentists should be mindful about the recurrence of malignancies in patients with oral and head and neck cancers, and they should thoroughly examine all the oral mucosal tissues at the recall appointments.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS
The intensive conditioning regimens of the transplantation can result in pronounced immunosuppression, greatly increasing a patient’s risk of mucositis, ulceration, haemorrhage, infection, and xerostomia (9). The complications begin to resolve when the haematologic status improves. Although the complete blood count and the differential count may be normal, the immunosuppression may last for up to a year after the transplant, along with the risk of infections. Also, the oral cavity and the salivary glands are commonly involved in graft-versus-host disease in the allograft recipients. This can result in mucosal inflammation, ulceration, and xerostomia and so a continued monitoring is necessary (10). Careful attention to the oral care in the immediate and long-term post-transplant period is important for the patient’s overall health.

References

1.
Jellema AP, Slotman BJ, Doornaert P, et al. Impact of radiation-induced xerostomia on the quality of life after primary radiotherapy among patients with head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 69(3): 751-60.
2.
Schubert MM, Appelbaum FR, Peterson DE, Lloid ME. Oral complications. In: Blume KG, Forman SJ, eds.: Thomas’ Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. 3rd ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Science In., 2004; 911-28.
3.
Stoykova M, Mateva NG, Novakova TN. Evaluation of the quality of life in patients with oral cavity cancer in three counties of south Bulgaria. Folia Med.2003;45(2),23-26.
4.
Villaret AB, Cappiello J, Piazza C, Pedruzzi B, Nicolai P. The quality of life in patients who were treated for cancer of the oral cavity, who required a reconstruction: A prospective study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28(3),120-25.
5.
Stoikova MS, Maslinkova JG. A review of the scales for the assessment of the quality of life (QOL) in patients with oral cavity cancer. Folia Med.2001;43(1-2),160-63.
6.
Stoikova M. Assessment of the quality of life in patients with oral cavity and jaw cancer in three regions of Bulgaria. J BUON.2007; Jul-Sept;12(3),395-98.
7.
De Graeff A, De Leeuw JR, Ros WJ, Hordijk GJ, Blijham GH, Winnubst JA. A prospective study on the quality of life of the patients with cancer of the oral cavity or the oropharynx, which was treated with surgery with or without radiotherapy. Oral Oncol. 1999;35(1),27-32.
8.
Shiboski CH, Hodgson TA, Ship JA, Schiødt M. Management of salivary hypofunction during and after radiotherapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod .2007; 103(suppl 1):S66.e1- S66.e19.
9.
Torres-Carranza E, Infante-Cossio P, Hernandez-Guisado JM, Hens- Aumente E, Gutierrez-Perez JL. Assessment of the quality of life in oral cancer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.2008;Nov 1,13(11),E735-41.
10.
Sonis ST, Elting LS, Keefe D, et al. Perspectives on cancer therapyinduced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for the patients. Cancer .2004; 100(9 Suppl): 1995-2025.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/3868:2348

Date of Submission: Jan 04, 2012
Date of Peer Review: Apr 15, 2012
Date of Acceptance: May 10, 2012
Date of Publishing: Aug 10, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com