Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 25239

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Readers' Comments (0) Article in PDF Audio Visual Citation Manager Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Archana Dambal

"Journal of clinical and diagnostic research is a welcome change in publishing practices. It aims to reach out to the grass-root level researchers who do not lack in experience, clinical material and ideas, but lack in their knowledge in English language and statistics. The journal achieves it's aim by supporting in these exact domains.
It also gives due credit to all research designs like descriptive and qualitative studies while many journals ignore these important study designs. The rigorous review process does not allow any compromise in quality
It is indexed in many indexing agencies and the articles are available under creative commons licence free of cost
The frequency of publication supports many aspiring authors from India and other countries.
It's wide scope welcomes articles across various specialities in medicine. In an era when there is an unscientific insistence on speciality specific research by regulatory bodies in medical education, JCDR supports collaborative research across specialities. I wish the publisher all the best in his future endeavors."



Dr. Archana Dambal
Department of General Medicine,
Belgaum Institute of Medical Sciences,Belgaum, Karnataka,INDIA,
On 30 Nov 2018




Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : April | Volume : 5 | Issue : 2 | Page : 187 - 190

Prevalence of Upper Extremity Musculo skeletal Disorders among workers in an industrial town in Tamilnadu

WMS JOHNSON,BERTHA A PRISCILLA JOHNSON

Sree Balaji Medical College, Chennai, India

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Bertha A, Department of Anatomy,
Christian Medical College,
Vellore 632 002, India
Phone number:(Res): 0416- 2284026; (Off): 2284245
Telefax No.0091-0416-2262268
Email: bertha@cmcvellore.ac.in; bertharathinam@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Musculo Skeletal Disorders (MSD) contribute 37% of the disease burden which is attributable to occupational risk factors globally, resulting in substantial disability. Despite mechanization and automation, there is an ever increasing incidence of MSD, which has an adverse impact on the individual and the society. Little information on the prevalence of MSD is available in South India. Aim: The present study was aimed primarily to evaluate the prevalence of MSD in industrial workers and also secondarily to identify the location specific MSD, to generate guidelines to optimize the work, to minimize the risk of injury development and to maximize the output quality. Material and Methods: This cross sectional pilot study included 219 subjects of age groups ranging from 18 to 55 years, from three different industries. Questionnaires were administered to assess the work exposure and health. The range of movementof the joints was calculated by using a Goniometer. The postural workload was assessed by using a RULA work sheet. A clinical examination was done to diagnose MSD. Results: 32.6% of the subjects suffered from MSD. The highest prevalence of MSD was seen among pyrotechnics (44.4 %), followed by match makers (32.7%) and litho offset printers (19.2%). An increased prevalence of symptom severity was observed in women (36.1%) and in individuals who performed moderately strenuous tasks (52.8%). Conclusion: The present study has estimated the baseline prevalence of MSD in industrial workers, which can be effectively applied for the optimisation of the work system to minimise the risk of injury and to maximise productivity. Key message: The knowledge of musculoskeletal disorders and its prevalence among industrial workers can be effectively applied for the optimisation of the work system to minimise the risk of injury and to maximise productivity.

Keywords

Industrial workers, work – posture, work load, musculoskeletal disorders

How to cite this article :

WMS JOHNSON,BERTHA A PRISCILLA JOHNSON . PREVALENCE OF UPPER EXTREMITY MUSCULO SKELETAL DISORDERS AMONG WORKERS IN AN INDUSTRIAL TOWN IN TAMILNADU . Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [serial online] 2011 April [cited: 2019 Apr 19 ]; 5:187-190. Available from
http://www.jcdr.net/back_issues.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2011&month=April&volume=5&issue=2&page=187-190&id=1245

Introduction The Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has defined musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) as injuries and disorders to the muscles, nerves, tendons, ligaments, joints, cartilages and the spinal discs (1) (vide their classification 0 Traumatic injuries and Disorders;(1) Systemic Diseases or Disorders;(2) Infectious and Parasitic Diseases;(3) Neoplasms, Tumours and Cancer; (4) Symptoms, Signs and Ill-defined Conditions; (5)(6)(7) Other Conditions or Disorders; (8) Multiple Diseases,Conditions or Disorders; (9) Nonclassifiable) . MSDs are a significant public health problem today, due to their high impact on disability, personal suffering, absence from work and the direct and indirect costs to the health care system. According to the statistics of the Global Burden of Diseases which has been developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), MSD contributes 37% of the disease burden which is attributable to occupational risk factors, in addition to 16% of hearing loss, 13% of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPDs), 11% of asthma, 8% of injuries, 9% of lung cancer and 2% of leukaemia.2, 3, 4. Owing primarily to the lack of data in developing countries like India, such a comprehensive figure has not yet been documented.

The occupational health in India gained momentum only after the tragic Bhopal gas incident in 1984, though the National Safety Council of India was set up by the Ministry of Labour, Government of India in 1966 and the pioneering effort of ICMR was established in 1911 for the formulation, coordination and the promotion of research. The global prevalence of MSD ranges from 14 to 42 % 3. Though India has seen tremendous developments in itseconomy and industrialization, there is a high incidence of musculoskeletal disorders. The prevalence in Northern India has been reported to be as high as 59.4%5. Although several possible methods have been employed to determine the prevalence of MSD, the estimates based on health care resource utilization may underestimate its true prevalence and may probably be biased towards the more severe and symptomatic cases. Moreover, the estimates of the prevalence of MSD can also be hindered by theunavailability of the health-care data, inaccuracies in coding, as well as inconsistent physician recognition of the early disease. The limited existing information in the industrial sectors in Southern India stresses the need for estimating the prevalence of MSD in vulnerable sections of the population. Sivakasi, which is called as “A town of three industries”, which is home to Printing / Offset Printing Presses and industries of Pyrotechnics (Fireworks) and Crackers and Safety Matches and Color Matches, was chosen for the study. The 2001 census recorded a population of 72,170 (50% males and 50% females)(6).

The purpose of this study was to present an overview of epidemiological evidence on the relationship between MSDs and workplace factors, specifically in manual workers of process industries as the man-machine interaction is high comparatively in those industries. With a more defined relationship between the two, work design practitioners will be able to more easily justify the ergonomic fixes through positive impacts on multiple key measures. Industries can use the data which is collected in this study to optimize the work systems to minimize the risk of injury development and to maximize the output quality. The expansion of these initial findings will provide the data to generate practical guidelines that can be used for the design and evaluation of the work system.

Material and Methods

This cross sectional studywas designed to evaluate the prevalence of upper extremity related musculoskeletal disorders in different occupational sectors in an industrial town in Tamilnadu. A sample size of 250 was arrived at, based on the previous prevalence rates of MSD globally and in North India. The study proposal was submitted to the Institutional Ethics Committee and due clearance was obtained from the same (IEC no.002/2006). Two hundred and nineteen individuals who reported to the industrial health care providers were included by a systematic sampling method, over a period of three months. The inclusion criteria were manual labourers with a minimum of a year’s work experience and ages ranging from 18 – 55 years, of both sexes, who reported to the Employment State Insurance (ESI) Hospital. Individuals with any acute ailments or systemic diseases, other staff who were not involved in manual labour, pregnant women and nursing mothers were excluded. Informed written consent was obtained from each of the participants.

A standardized questionnaire was administered and data regarding the job title, previous employment, job description, the duration and frequency of work, rest periods, description of injury or illness and information on other known nonoccupational risk factors was collected. The workload of the individual was assessed by using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) score. A detailed clinical examination was then done. Goniometry measurements were taken to assess the range of motion in all the upper extremity joints. MSD was diagnosed by following the diagnostic criteria for upper limb disorders which was proposed by the HSE Workshop, which was adapted from Harrington et al, 1998 (Table/Fig 1)(7). The acquired data was analyzed by using the SPSS statistical software 15 . The prevalence of MSD in the study population was calculated as percentages and odds ratios were arrived at to denote the comparative prevalence.

Results

The study group consisted of 74 (33.8%) men and 145 (66.2%) women. Ninety three (42.5%) of them were under 40 years of age. Only 71 were educated above class seven. A majority of them were illiterate (67.6%). The socioeconomic status of more than 80% of the study group was at less than an annual income of INR 25,000/=. All the women of the study population were non smokers. 95% of those who were included in the study, worked for more than eight hours/day and of these, 8.2% were heavy, 85.8% were moderate and 5.9% were light workers. 85.3% were permitted less than two hours of rest. Thirty five of the 219 participants agreed to be exposed to high levels of noise, almost all (90.4%) agreed to be exposed to chemicals and 30% agreed to be exposed to vibrations. 16.9% were found to have periods of absenteeism of more than 48 hours and 58.3% were found to be involved in strenuous work. The descriptive characteristics of the study population in three different industrial sectors arerepresented in (Table/Fig 2). The study revealed an overall prevalence of 32.6% of MSD. More women had severe symptoms (36.1%) than men (25.7%) It was noted that there was an increased prevalence of symptom severity among the women (36.1%) as compared to the men (25.7%). The highest prevalence of MSD (52.8%) was observed to be associated with moderately strenuous tasks and only 4.4% was associated with non strenuous tasks. 32.7% of the prevalence was observed among workers in the match industry, 19.2% was observed among the workers in the litho-offset printing industry and 44.4% was observed among the workers in the fireworks industry. The prevalence of MSD among the several subcategories is depicted in (Table/Fig 3)

Discussion

The prevalence of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders among the workers in an industrial town in Tamilnadu was found to be 32.6%.It is comparativeto the global prevalence of 37%, but it is much less than the 59.4% prevalence which was observed by Joshi et.al in their study among the workers in North India 5.Ninety seven pyrotechnic workers (44.4%)71 (32.7%) match factory workers and 42 (19.2%) litho-offset printing workers were found to be affected with MSD. The discrepancies in the prevalence rates in different sectors of the industry are due to the differences in the work place factors and variations in the shop floor maneouver.“Working in the same position for long periods” was the job factor which was identified as the most problematic for all these sectors. The tendons which provide a link between the muscle and the bone may be inflamed due to repeated loading, especially when working in awkward postures. There can be degeneration on the surface of the tendon. Alternatively, there can be endoneural oedema (swelling around the covering of the nerves) with increased intrafascicular pressure and the displacement of myelin in a dose response manner (8). Hagberg et al considered that therewas a possible relationship between the local mechanical pressure and the onset of the musculoskeletal problems. Direct mechanical pressure on the tissues may be due to poorly designed tools and handles 9. Upper limb complaints in the workers with repetitive work manifests as myalgia, which could probably be due to the ischaemia resulting from occlusion or from the impedance of the circulation. The present study did not attempt to establish this causal effect of repetitive injuries, considering the ethical reasons which were involved in taking the muscle biopsies from human subjects(9).

Faitgue that occurs due to repetitive tasks, as seen in printing and firework industrial workers, can be characterized as subjectiveor objective (10).Subjective fatigue is characterizedby a decline of alertness, mental concentration, motivation and other psychological factors, whereas objective fatigue is characterized by a decline in the work output. A majority of the study subjects showed signs of fatigue, as they were in stations that involved repetitive cycles. A prolonged exposure to the hand-arm vibration can lead to a condition which is known as the Raynaud’s phenomenon of Occupational Origin, Vibration induced White Finger (VWF), or the Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) (11), (12), (13). But the present study did not establish any such case, probably because of the nature of the work that did not involve much vibration.

Although the prevalence of occupational skin disease was not substantial enough, skin lesions such as contact dermatitis were seenon the hands of personnel who workedin the fireworks and match industry for a long term without using personal protective equipments. Contact dermatitis was generally confined to the areas which were actually touched. It was by far the most common of all the occupational skin diseases, accounting for one-half to two-thirds of all the cases.The clinical signs in the affected human subjects included one or more of erythema (reddening), scaling and thickening and wereaccompanied by an itch or a burning sensation.

A higher prevalence rate of MSD in women (36.1%)was seen in this study. The prevalence rates of MSD in subjects aged 18- 40 years was estimated to be 32.6%. It is observed that young workerswere not sparedfrom MSD. Adequate pre-employment orientation and on the house training can go a long way inpreventing MSD, for which there is no treatment, once affected. This study also highlights a higher prevalence of MSD among the pyrotechnic industry workers. These employees should be targeted by the occupational health professionals during the preplacement medical examination to create awareness about the risk factors, especially awkward postures during work. Prevention strategies should be taught in the induction training program to reduce the potential disability which is associated with workrelated MSD by the shop floor managers.

The musculoskeletal symptoms were not significant to the length of the service, unlike the case in most other studies.This can be partly attributed to the fact that child labour abolition was not active until a few years ago and that many of these individuals hadbeen working in these industries for more than 15 years, as most of themwere employed part time from the age of eight. An increased duration of work for more than 12 hours, no rest period, no weekly off, double wages on holidays and 100% attendancewere some factors which fetchedincentives for the individuals with no recuperation period.

Conclusion

The overall prevalence of MSD was 32.6%. It is also interesting to note that therewas a gender specific prevalence and an increased prevalence of symptom severity among women (36.1%)as comparedto the men (25.7%). Severity specific prevalence: the highest prevalence (52.8%) was observed for strenuous tasks and only 4.4% prevalence was observed for non strenuous tasks. Sector specific prevalence: 44.4% of the prevalence was observed in the firework industry, 32.7%was observed among the workers in the match industry and 19.2% was observed in the litho-offset printing industry. As workers have a tendency to seek medical help only when the symptoms are severe, the milder forms may be more prevalent and underreported. Therefore, the role of the factory medical officers and paramedical workers is very crucial in educating the workers to properly take care of their health as wellto practice proper work postures. Nevertheless, this study has uneartheda widely prevalent disorder that warrants preventive measures.

Limitations This is a hospital based survey and therefore is not a true indicator of community prevalence of MSD. This study had the limitationswhich are associated with cross - sectional studies, unlikethat of case control studies. Cluster sampling from many industries would have been a better representation of the study group rather than the random sampling from a limited number of industries.

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the study subjects from the Sivakasi Municipality, TamilNadu, for their participation and their active co-operation which was lent to the field staff during the data collection.

Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

1.
. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, The Editor’s Desk. 2008, Dec 2- Available at http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2008/ dec/wk1/art02.htm
2.
. M Concha-Barrientos, DI Nelson and T Driscoll et al., Selected occupational risk factors. In: M Ezzati, AD Lopez, A Rodgers and CJL Murray, Editors, Comparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors, World Health Organization, Geneva (2004), pp. 1728-1757
3.
. WHO – Global burden of diseases – http://www.who.int/topics/global_ burden_of_disease/en/
4.
. Nelson. The Global Burden of Selected Occupational Diseases and Injury risks: Methodology and Summary. Amer J Ind Med 2005; 48(6):400-18.
5.
. Joshi TK, Menon KK, Kishore J. Musculoskeletal disorders in industrial workers of Delhi. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2001 Jul-Sep; 7(3):217-21.
6.
. “Census of India 2001: Data from the 2001 Census, including cities, villages and towns (Provisional)”. Census Commission of India. Archived from the original on 2004-06-16. http://web.archive.org/ web/20040616075334/
7.
. Harrington JM, Carter JT, Birrell L, Gompertz D. Surveillance case definitions for work related upperlimb pain syndromes. Occup. Environ. Med. 1998; 55: 264-271.
8.
. Rempel D, Dahlin L, Lundborg G. Biological response of peripheral nerves to loading ; pathophysiology of nerve compression syndromes and vibration induced neuropathy. Work related musculoskeletal disorder; report, workshop summary, and workshop papers. National Research Council, Washington DC; National Academy Press, 1999; 98 – 115.
9.
. Hagberg M, Silverstein BA, Wells RV, et al. Work related musculoskeletal disorders; A reference for prevention; Kuorinka I and Forcier L (eds) London; Taylor and Francis 1995;556.
10.
. Bills, A. G. The psychology of efficiency. A discussion of the hygiene of mental work. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1943;776-887.
11.
. Taylor W. The Vibration Syndrome. London; Academic Press; 1974;887
12.
. Pelmear P L, Taylor W and Wasserman D E. Hand-Arm Vibration – A Comprehensive Guide for Occupational Health Professionals. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1992;453.
13.
. Taylor W, Pelmear P L (eds). Vibration White Finger in Industry. London: Academic Press; 1975 p xxi.

DOI and Others

JCDR/2011/1245

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com