Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 318741

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionKey MessageReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2010 | Month : August | Volume : 4 | Issue : 4 | Page : 2837 - 2841 Full Version

The occurrence of clinically evident ischaemic heart disease in patients of type 2 diabetes with resting tachycardia


Published: August 1, 2010 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2010/.858
PRACHETH R, ADHIKARI P M*, SABITHA P**, KAMATH A

*Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India-575 001.** Royal College of Medicine Perak, UniKL, Ipoh, Malaysia.

Correspondence Address :
authenticity)
Dr. Prabha Adhikari M
Ballal Bagh, Mangalore, Karnataka State, India -575 003., Telephone No.: 09880991290 (Mobile) 91-824-2445858 (O), Fax No: 91 824 2443203 (O), Email: adhikari_pmr@yahoo.com
sabita_rao1@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological studies have reported the association between resting tachycardia (RT) and cardiovascular mortality, both in cardiac and non cardiac subjects.
Aims: To investigate the association between RT and clinically evident ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in diabetic patients.
Settings and Design: Retrospective analysis of the hospital data.
Data collection period - 2008-2009.
Material and Methods: Electro cardiogram recordings of diabetic patients (n=100) were used for the calculation of the resting heart rate (RHR). RHR > 90 beats/ minute (bpm) was considered as RT. Presence/ absence of IHD were noted from the patient case records. The association between RHR and the prevalence of IHD was analyzed by applying the x2 test by using the SPSS software 12 version. P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant
Results: Fifteen percent of the patients had RT and 28 % had clinical evidence suggestive of IHD. More than 50 % of those with RHR >90/bpm had IHD as compared to 23.5% in the group having RHR ≤90/bpm and the comparison between the two showed statistical significance (p=0.028).
Conclusions: This retrospective analysis reports a positive association between RT and the pre-existing IHD in diabetic patients. RHR could be considered as a clinical marker for clinically evident IHD. A careful search for coronary artery disease, including the administration of an angiogram need to be considered in all diabetic patients presenting with RT.

Keywords

Cardiac autonomic neuropathy, Diabetes mellitus, Ischaemic heart disease, resting heart rate, resting tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION
Patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are reported to have an increase in all-cause mortality and elevated resting heart rate (RHR) is associated with an increased risk of death due to cardiovascular, cardiac and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) among patients of T2DM (1). Resting tachycardia (RT) was considered as a mere indicator of cardiovascular risk until several epidemiological studies unveiled an independent association of RT with cardiovascular and all cause mortality in the population with or without the evidence of pre-existing coronary artery disease (CAD) and now, RT is regarded as one of the independent cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVDRF) (2). HR reduction has proven to be beneficial in myocardial infarction (MI), chronic heart failure (CHF) and in stable angina pectoris (2). However, HR lowering is not considered for the treatment of the general population without CVD. Although, there exists a large number of studies that relate mortality with RT, published data associating RT with the occurrence of IHD is limited. This hospital-based retrospective analysis was aimed at investigating the association between RT and the presence of clinically evident IHD in patients of T2DM.

Material and Methods

We used the secondary data of T2DM patients (n=100) who had participated in an institutional ethics committee approved research project and all these subjects were the registered members of the hospital diabetic clinic. The study participants had their 12 lead electrocardiograms (ECG) recorded in the morning, following ten minutes of rest, one hour after breakfast. The necessary medications were taken by the patients, half an hour before breakfast. The participants were asked to refrain from smoking and from having hot beverages half an hour before the ECG recording. Those with poor glycaemic control, acute diabetic complications, infection, or acute coronary syndrome within last six months, were excluded. The blood pressure was stabilized before entry into the study in hypertensive patients. RHR was obtained automatically from the ECG recording. RHR >90beats per minute (bpm) was defined as RT. The criteria followed to define the presence of clinically evident IHD are - a medical history of angina with or without ECG or stress test findings of ischaemia; unstable angina or a documented history of myocardial infarction with supportive findings in ECG, stress test, echocardiography and cardiac enzymes. Asymptomatic CAD cases were also considered for analysis. Stable angina and asymptomatic CAD were grouped as category 1, whereas category 2 included cases of unstable angina and MI. The demographic data, body-mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, co-morbid conditions, complications of DM and the list of medications, all as on the day of ECG recording, were documented. The variables were presented either as percentage values or as mean±SD, as in case of continuous variables. The association of RHR with IHD and with other variables like gender, BMI, co-morbidities and with the use of different drugs were analyzed by applying the x2 test by using the SPSS software 12 version. P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

(Table/Fig 1) depicts the patient characteristics. The association between the frequency of IHD and RHR is presented in (Table/Fig 2). Fifteen percent of patients had RT and 28 % had clinical evidence suggestive of IHD. Five among the latter had MI, none having undergone coronary intervention. More than 50 % of those with RHR >90/bpm had IHD, as compared to 23.5% in the group having RHR ≤90/bpm and this association is of statistical importance (p=0.028). HR was not significantly related with (data not shown) gender, BMI (<25 & ≥25kg/m2), presence / absence of co-morbidities (hypertension, and dyslipidaemia) and peripheral neuropathy (as diagnosed by history, clinical examination and biothesiometry for vibration threshold) and with the use of different drugs (insulin, oral anti diabetic drugs, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers and drugs modulating rennin - angiotensin system).

Discussion

Discussion and Conclusions
In this retrospective analysis, a strong positive association between RT and the pre-existing IHD was demonstrated in diabetic patients. The RT group had a two fold higher frequency of IHD than the group with RHR ≤90bpm. Several epidemiological studies have reported a strong association between RT and an all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the population, with various CVDs (2),(3),(4). Interestingly, elevated RHR was also considered as an independent predictor of an all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in epidemiological follow-up studies that included healthy individuals (5). In postmenopausal women without baseline CAD, RHR was found to be a predictor of coronary events (6). In another study, elevated RHR was found to be an independent risk factor for fatal IHD events, but particularly for sudden cardiac death and this effect was marked in men who were free of pre-existing IHD at initial examination (7). The role of RHR in myocardial ischaemia as seen in patients with stable angina is well known. Increased HR contributes to an imbalance between myocardial oxygen demand and supply, by causing both an increase in myocardial oxygen demand and a decrease in coronary blood supply, the latter resulting from a reduction of collateral perfusion pressure and collateral flow (5). Although the present analysis did not demonstrate a positive relation of RT with pre-existing hypertension or dyslipidaemia, research has revealed a significant association of RT with hypertension and an atherogenic lipoprotein profile, the two well known CVDRFs (8). Experimental studies in monkeys suggest that high HR can also exert a direct atherogenic action on the arterial wall due to haemodynamic stress on the vascular wall and reduction in the HR retarded the development of coronary atherosclerosis. Haemodynamic stress related to high HR can also encourage the disruption of the atherosclerotic plaque and precipitate an acute coronary event (8). Clinical trial data report that the currently existing HR lowering drugs significantly reduced the cardiovascular events in subjects with acute MI and CHF and that HR reduction itself was partly attributed for the favourable outcomes (2). HR reduction is the cornerstone of the treatment of chronic stable angina (2), although the beneficial effects of HR reduction in hypertension is debated (9). Despite the epidemiological evidence on the predictive role of RHR in the mortality in the CVD and the non CVD population, RHR has not been given importance in CVD risk assessment (2). HR lowering is approved for the therapy of clinically evident IHD as a secondary prevention strategy and not for the primary prevention of IHD in the non-cardiac general population presenting with RT. This is probably because there is no substantial evidence on the predictive role of RT in the incidence of IHD and on the beneficial effects of HR lowering drugs in decreasing the incidence of IHD in subjects with RT.
A large follow-up study confirmed that in patients of T2DM, elevated RHR is associated with an increased risk of death due to cardiovascular, cardiac and IHD (1). Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN), one of the common complications of T2DM, is found to be linked with RT, painless myocardial ischaemia or infarction and sudden cardiac deaths (10),(11),(12). The mortality rate is higher for diabetics with CAN than for those without CAN and silent ischaemia is significantly more frequent in patients with, than in those without CAN, which possibly delays appropriate therapy. The sympathetic nervous system is stimulated in the early stages of DM and extended exposure of the adrenergic receptors to increased catecholamine levels, together with hyperglycaemia and insulin deficiency, is believed to cause diabetic CAN (11). In the present study, the lack of clinical assessment data on CAN does not facilitate us to link CAN and RT. Even in the absence of CAN, sympatho adrenal discharge consequent to hypoglycaemia alone, can add to the risk of ventricular tachycardia and death (13). However, the mean FBG (145.44±38.04mg/dl) measured prior to recording ECG in our study ruled out the possibility of incident hypoglycaemia as the causal factor for RT. Epidemiological studies have discovered an association between insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) and an increase in the sympathetic activity, which was also supported by experimental evidence (8). Insulin resistance is one of the key factors which is responsible for hyperglycaemia in T2DM and can result in a cluster of CVDRFs that constitute IRS and the risk of cardiac events is increased in the presence of IRS, even without overt DM (14).
Overall, evidence shows that RT plays an important role, either as a marker of excess sympathetic activity or as an independent risk factor in DM associated CVD risk. With this background highlighting the relevance of RT in DM, the findings of the present study that RT doubles the risk of developing IHD in diabetic patients, tempt us to opine that RHR could be considered as a clinical marker for clinically evident IHD. A careful search for CAD, including the application of an angiogram, need to be considered in all DM patients presenting with RT, even in those without symptoms which are suggestive of IHD. This strategy may be of great value in preventing attacks of MI or sudden cardiac deaths in DM patients. The results of the current analysis also prompt us to propose that HR reduction may be considered as a primary prevention measure for IHD in all diabetic patients with RT. With the available evidence, one can speculate that the pharmacological modulation of sympathetic activity aiming at reducing RHR in diabetics may decrease the incidence of IHD, not only by decreasing the oxygen demand, but also indirectly by preventing the progression of CAN and IR.

Although recording HR is a simple procedure, several practical problems can arise while aiming at an optimal HR on an individual basis with drugs, especially in a patient without established CVD (2),(3),(4),(5). Moreover, in the absence of any evidence on the beneficial effects of HR reduction in preventing the subsequent IHD in an apparently non cardiac patient, our suggestion to consider HR lowering therapy for the primary prevention of IHD in this population may sound too premature. In addition, the present study had potential limitations. The subjects with current ECG reading were retrospectively evaluated for the presence or absence of IHD and hence, the association of current RHR was demonstrated with the prevalent IHD. This association was not adjusted for gender, BMI, co-morbid conditions, peripheral neuropathy and drug treatments, although, the independent association of HR was ruled out with these confounders.
Well designed prospective studies in a cohort of diabetic population need to be carried out to ascertain the predictive value of RHR for a new onset of clinically evident IHD in diabetic patients and to investigate the beneficial effects of currently existing HR lowering drugs like sympatholytics and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and a new class of pure HR lowering agents like selective If inhibitors (ivabradine). The outcome of such studies would help to draw primary preventive HR lowering treatment strategy guidelines for the diabetic population.

Key Message

1. The prevalence of clinically evident ischaemic heart disease is two fold higher in diabetics with resting tachycardia than in those without resting tachycardia.
2. All diabetic patients presenting with resting tachycardia, even those without a clinical evidence of ischaemic heart disease, need to undergo a careful search for the presence of coronary artery disease.
3. Such a diagnostic approach may help to prevent the attacks of myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac deaths in diabetic patients.
4. Heart rate lowering therapy using sympatholytics, calcium channel blockers and selective If inhibitors may be of value in all diabetic patients with resting tachycardia.

References

1.
Stettler C, Bearth A, Allemann S, Zwahlen M, Zanchin L, Deplazes M et al. QTc interval and resting heart rate as long-term predictors of mortality in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 23-year follow-up. Diabetologia 2007;50:186-94.
2.
Fox K, Borer JS, Camm AJ, Danchin N, Ferrari R, Sendon JL et al. Resting Heart Rate in Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:823-30.
3.
Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tendera M, Robertson M, Ferrari R, on behalf of the BEAUTIFUL investigators. Heart rate as a prognostic risk factor in patients with coronary artery disease and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008;372: 817-21.
4.
Daly CA, Clemens F, Sendon JL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, Danchin N, et al. Inadequate control of heart rate in patients with stable angina: results from the European heart survey. Postgrad Med J. 2010 ;86:212-7.
5.
Arnold JM, Fitchett DH, Howlett JG, Lonn EM, Tardif JC. Resting heart rate: A modifiable prognostic indicator of cardiovascular risk and outcomes? Can J Cardiol 2008; 24 (Suppl A): 3A–8A.
6.
Hsia J, Larson JC, Ockene JK, Sarto GE, Allison MA, Hendrix SL et al. Resting heart rate as a low tech predictor of coronary events in women: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2009;338: b219.
7.
Shaper AG, Wannamethee G, Macfarlane PW, Walker M. javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'Br Heart J.'); Heart rate, ischemic heart disease, and sudden cardiac death in middle-aged British men. Br Heart J 1993;70:49-55.
8.
Palatini P, Julius S. Elevated Heart Rate: A Major Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease. Clin Exp Hypertens 2004;26:637-44.
9.
Bangalore S, Sawhney S, Messerli FH. Relation of beta-blocker-induced heart rate lowering and cardioprotection in hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1482-9.
10.
Maser RE, Lenhard MJ. Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy Due to Diabetes Mellitus: Clinical Manifestations, Consequences, and Treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:5896-903..
11.
Scott LA, Kench PL. Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in the Diabetic Patient: Does 123I-MIBG Imaging Have a Role to Play in Early Diagnosis? J Nucl Med Technol 2004; 32:66–71.
12.
Vinik AI, Freeman R, Erbas T. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Semin Neurol 2003;23:365-72.
13.
Heller SR. Abnormalities of the electrocardiogram during hypoglycaemia: the cause of the dead in bed syndrome? Int J Clin Pract 2002 ;129:27-32.
14.
Vlek AL, van der Graaf Y, Spiering W, Visseren FL; SMART study group. Effect of metabolic syndrome or type II diabetes mellitus on the occurrence of recurrent vascular events in hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2008;225:358-65.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com