Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 64071

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2007 | Month : December | Volume : 1 | Issue : 6 | Page : 476 - 482

Tinea Capitis among Iraqi Children: Public Health Implication

Al SAMARAI A G M

Prof. Dr. Abdul Ghani Mohamed Al Samarai. Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Tikrit University, P O Box 45, Al Yarmouk ST., Tikrit, Iraq

Correspondence Address :
Prof. Dr. Abdul Ghani Mohamed Al Samarai. Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Tikrit University, P O Box 45, Al Yarmouk ST., Tikrit, Iraq. Mobile: 07901755258, 07705871455; e-mail: galsamarrai@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background: Recent observations on tinea capitis cases in Iraq suggest that there has been a change in the pattern of infection, with a recent and significant rise in the incidence of infection due to anthropophilic dermatophytes.
Objectives:The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence rate and identify factors that might affect the spread of infection of tinea capitis in Iraq.
Patients and Methods: There were 40,384 children from 6 to 16 years of age included in the study. The children were from two different geographical areas.
Results: The prevalence rate of clinically diagnosed tinea capitis was 1.25%, while the mycological prevalence rate was 0.86%. The above difference between clinical and mycological prevalence rates was statistically significant (P < 0.001). In addition, the prevalence rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in males (1.08%) as compared to females (0.96%) and in rural areas (2.06%; P < 0.0001) as compared to urban (0.62%) areas. Animal contact and family history of tinea capitis were important risk factors in disease transmission. The prevalence of tinea capitis was 86.3% in age group of 6–10 years (P < 0.0001). The non-inflammatory type of infection was found in 87.5% of cases (P < 0.0001). The frequency of isolation of anthropophilic dermatophytes was reported in 73.3% of cases (P < 0.001). The predominant causative agent was Trichophyton tonsurans (26%), followed by T. verrucosum (25.1%). The isolated species was distributed in urban and rural areas.
Conclusion: This study indicated a shift in the epidemiologic patterns of tinea capitis in Iraq. T. tonsurans was the most prevalent cause of tinea capitis in Iraq. There was a significant role for influence of infection for sex, residence, animal contact, and hair type.

Keywords

Tinea capitis, Iraq, children

Introduction
Tinea capitis has a worldwide distribution (1) and tends to be epidemic and endemic in areas where crowding and imperfect conditions for personal hygiene seem to favour its spread and persistence within the community (2). The prevalence of infection varies considerably with geographical location and climatic condition (3). Many studies that have been conducted throughout the world revealed the increased prevalence and shift in the epidemiology of tinea capitis (4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9)and(10). Geographic locations are important factors in the type of infection seen (3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14)and(15).

Material and Methods

Objectives
The objectives of this study are to
1.determine the demographic and clinical characteristics of tinea capitis in Iraq;
2.identify the etiological dermatophytes for tinea capitis in Iraq.

Study Population
A cross-sectional community study was performed, and two groups of schools were chosen. The first group was distributed in urban areas, and the second group was selected from different rural areas in Tikrit and Kirkuk governorates. For Tikrit survey two groups of schools were chosen: the first group from urban areas and the second from differing rural areas in the vicinity of Tikrit. Three boys’ schools, three girls’ schools, and two large mixed schools were randomly selected from five urban areas of Tikrit. Six schools from four rural villages were chosen: two boys’, two girls’, and two mixed schools. Tikrit survey was conducted between September 1994 and April 1995, and a total of 4461 children were included in the survey. The second survey was carried out in Kirkuk from September 1996 to May 1997. In urban areas 131 schools were selected, of them 24 were girl’s schools, 20 boys’ schools, and 87 mixed schools. In rural areas 20 schools were selected: eight boys’ schools, three girl’s schools, and nine mixed schools. A total number of 35,923 children were included in the survey. The criteria for their selection were the same as described previously (14),(15). The children were all preadolescent school-age children. Their ages range from 6 to 16 years. Since both surveys were with the same design, the data of both were combined together and reanalyzed to get an idea about the pattern of tinea capitis in Iraq. All the students in the school were examined, so a total of 40,384 students were included in the study. The scalp of each child was thoroughly examined in all areas for evidence of scaling, crusting, follicular inflammation, hair loss, and erythema. Clinical diagnosis of tinea capitis was done according to criteria of Arnold et al. (11).

Sample Collection
In all suspected cases, hairs and scales were collected for mycological examination by a conventional technique. Scale scrapings were collected from at least two areas with a number 15 sterile surgical blade, and approximately 12 hair stumps (roots) were pulled out with sterile epilator forceps. Both hairs and scales were placed in a clean, labelled envelope and sent to the laboratory for investigation.


Laboratory Procedures and Identification
Media used for primary isolation of dermatophytes, maintenance, and identification were according to conventional reported procedures (16). Species were identified using conventional method, which emphasised colony morphology, microscopy, and other miscellaneous tests. Cultures were examined macroscopically for morphology, texture, and colour from the top and reverse sides of the plate. Then using a sterile straight loop the colony was examined by placing a sample on a drop of lactophenol solution on a clean glass slide. The matted mycelial mass was teased or separated with dissecting needles to facilitate microscopical observation. The preparation was then covered by a cover slip and examined under the microscope for the presence of microconidia, macroconidia, and other structures. Every positive growth obtained was subcultured on two Sabouraud plates, one with added yeast and the other with added sodium chloride. The inoculated plates were incubated for 2 weeks at 28°C to further stimulate the chlamydospores. After identification was completed, the plates were kept refrigerated at 4°C for a maximum period of 1 month.

In vitro hair perforation by certain dermatophytes was used for further species identification. This test was used to differentiate certain species of T. mentagrophytes, which can penetrate hair in vitro, from T. rubrum, which cannot.<

Results

The prevalence rate of clinically diagnosed tinea capitis was 1.25%, whereas the mycological prevalence rate was 0.86%. The above difference between clinical and mycological prevalence rate was statistically significant (P < 0.001). In addition, the prevalence rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in males (1.08%) as compared to females (0.96%) and in rural areas (2.06%; P < 0.0001) as compared to urban (0.62%) areas (Table/Fig 1).

Tinea capitis cases were more common in urban (59%) than in rural (41%) areas (P < 0.0001) and in males (70%) than in females (P < 0.05) (Table/Fig 2). The case frequency was 93.5% in children with history of animal contact, whereas the corresponding value was 31.3% in children without history of animal contact (P < 0.0001).

Normally, the frequency of infection was reported in all cases with a family history of tinea capitis; however, the infection was reported in 63% of children without any family history of disease (P < 0.0001) (Table/Fig 2).

The prevalence of tinea capitis was 86.3% in age group of 6–10 years (P < 0.0001). The prevalence of tinea capitis was lower in straight hair (33%), as compared to curly hair (67%, P < 0.001) (Table/Fig 3). Frontal site was the predominant (46%) site involved. The non-inflammatory type of infection was found in 87.5% of cases (P < 0.0001). The scaling was found to be the predominant clinical characteristic (59.1%). Seborrhoid was the most common clinical form (80.8%). Favus presented in 1.7% of cases (six cases); five of them were caused by T. violaceum and in one case the causative dermatophytes were unidentified.

The frequency of isolation of anthropophilic dermatophytes was reported in 68.1% of cases (P < 0.001). The predominant causative agent was T. tonsurans (27.6%), followed by T. verrucosum (26.7%). The isolated species was distributed in urban and rural areas.

In rural areas, the predominant isolate was T. verrucosum (33.3%), followed by T. tonsurans (21%) (Table/Fig 4). In urban areas, T. tonsuransforms the predominant (32.5%) isolate, followed by T. mentagrophytes var interdigitale (26.8%) ((Table/Fig 4)).

The isolated species were distributed in both sexes. In male, the predominantly isolated species was T. tonsurans (27%) followed by T. verrucosum (25.2%), whereas in female the predominantly isolated species was T. verrucosum (30.5%), followed by T. tonsurans (29.5%) (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

This study has shown that the clinical prevalence rate of tinea capitis, in a large sample of primary school children in two different Iraqi governorates, was 1.25%. However, the mycological prevalence rate was significantly lower than clinical prevalence rate. Sex seems to play a role in infection, as the prevalence rate was more in male as compared to female. This male predominance of infection was also reported for other geographical areas (9),(17),(18),(19),(20) and (21).

The high rate of tinea capitis in male may be attributed to the easy implantation of spores because of short hair (22) and frequency of sharing comb, brushes, and cups (23). This study shows that the prevalence of tinea capitis was more in rural than in urban areas. This finding is in agreement with that reported before for different geographical areas in Iraq (24),(25)and(26). The high prevalence rate of the disease in rural areas may be due to low standard of living, low standard of health education, overcrowding, poor hygiene, close personal contact, animal contact, and no separation between animal house and their houses (26). Contact with animals seems to be an important risk factor that increases prevalence rate, as this study indicated higher significant rate in children with animal contacts than in children without animal contacts. This was also reported for other geographical areas outside Iraq (18),(19),(22).

Presence of tinea capitis in other family members also acts as an important source of infection. This is due to intra-familial transmission, and the home might be more likely a source of infection than the school (26),(27). These results are reported by others (17),(27),(28),(29)and (30). Hair type influences the infection rate, and thus the cases were more in children with curly hair. This could be due to difficulty in hair washing and cleaning, which provides stable and less hazardous environment for dermatophytes (1),(26),(31),(32). The predominant clinical form was seborrhoid, and the mostly affected site was frontal area of the scalp.

Concerning aetiology, the zoophilic dermatophytes were found as the cause of infection in 31.9% of cases. These zoophilic organisms are acquired through contact with infected animals, since a large number of families in the study areas were in contact with animals. Although human infections with zoophiles are of the supportive type, animal infection may be clinically silent and thus the animals serve as asymptomatic carriers (33). Anthropophilic dermatophytes were more predominant cause of tinea capitis. This may be due to the fact that anthropophilic infections are often epidemic in nature (33), and children are population at risk of anthropohilic tinea capitis (33),(34). Thus, prevention control programs for tinea capitis in children may need to take this in consideration when designing and performing their program. Primary school health programs for tinea capitis control must concentrate on primary school students who demonstrate higher prevalence rate (ages 6–10 years).

The predominantly isolated dermatophyte was ere T. tonsurans, and this finding indicated a shif

Conclusion

In conclusion, there were significant differences in prevalence rate in regards to gender, residence, animal contact, hair type, clinical characteristics, and clinical forms. The significant differences were detected in frequency distribution of dermatophytes as a cause of tinea capitis and their distribution in rural and urban areas and indicate a shift in epidemiologic patterns. However, the conclusion emerged from this study demonstrate the demographic and clinical characteristics of the disease in Iraq as a whole country.

References

1.
Rippon JW. The changing epidemiology and emerging patterns of dermatophytes species. Curr Top Med Mycol 1985;1:208–34.
2.
Al-Sogair S, Hay RJ. Fungal infection in children: tinea capitis. Clin Dermatol 2000;18:679–85.
3.
Shah HG, Amin AG, Kavinde MS, Patel GD. An analysis of 2000 cases of dermatophytoses. Indian J Pathol Bacteriol 1975;18:32–7.
4.
Kradjen S. Dermatophytes: epidemiological and clinical features. In: Kane J, Summerbell R, Kradjken S, Sigler L, Land G, editors. Laboratory handbook of dermatophytes: a clinical guide and laboratory handbook in dermatophytes. Belmont: Star Publishing Company; 1997. p. 5–32.
5.
Ghannoum M, Isham N, Hajjeh F, et al. Tinea capitis in Cleveland: survey of elementary school students. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:189–93.
6.
Chinelli P, Sofiatti A, Nunes R. Dermatophyte agents in the city of Sao Paulo from 1992–2002. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2003;Sep/Oct:1–8.
7.
Labato MN, Vugia DJ, Frieden IJ, Tinea capitis in California children: a population based study of growing epidemics. Pediatrics 1997;99:551–4.
8.
Gargoom AM, Elyazachi MB, Maki S, Duweb GA. Tinea capitis in Benghazi, Libya. Int J Dermatol 2000;39:263–5.
9.
Popoola TOS, Ojo DA, Alabi RO. Prevalence of dermatophytosis in junior secondary school children in Ogum State, Nigeria. Mycoses 2006;49:499–503.
10.
Gumusay T, Ilkit M. Epidemiology of tinea capitis in Ceyhan district, Adana in Cukurova region, Turkey. Mycoses 2006;49:346–9.
11.
Arnold HL, Odom RB, James WD. Andrews diseases of the skin. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1990. p. 319–24.
12.
Champion RH, Burton JL, Burns DA, Breathnach SM, eds. Rook/ Wilkinson/Ebling textbook of dermatology. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Blackwell Science; 1998. p. 1277–376.
13.
Al-Samarai AGM, Fathi HI. Tinea capitis in Iraq: clinical types. J Islamic Med Assoc [North Am] 1999;5:236–8.
Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1] [Table / Fig - 2] [Table / Fig - 3] [Table / Fig - 4]

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .