JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pathology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25146.9795
Year : 2017 | Month : May | Volume : 11 | Issue : 5 Full Version Page : EC01 - EC04

Role of Immunofluorescence in Adult Onset Nephrotic Syndrome-A Study in a Tertiary Care Centre of Western India

Sharada Rane1, Prerana Mutyal2, Nicholas Dcunha3, Mayur Parkhi4, Meenal Jadhav5

1 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, BJ Government Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
2 Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, BJ Government Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
3 Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, BJ Government Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
4 Assistant Profesor, Department of Pathology, BJ Government Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
5 Profesor and Head of Department, Department of Pathology, RCSM Government Medical College, Kolhapur, Pune, Maharashtra, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Nicholas Dcunha, Room No 25, Chatrapati Shivaji New Residents Hostel, Church Road, Pune-411001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drnicholasdcunha@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Study of renal Immunofluorescence (IF) is an ancillary but essential technique in evaluation of renal biopsies in glomerulopathies and also it enlightens on the pathogenesis of nephrotic syndrome.

Aim

To determine the role of IF in evaluating definite subtyping and diagnosis of adult onset nephrotic syndrome and attempting clinicopathological correlation.

Materials and Methods

A total of 52 patients of adult onset nephrotic syndrome were evaluated clinically and with pertinent investigations; and subjected to USG guided percutaneous renal biopsy which was processed and stained for light microscopy and for immunofluorescence by direct method (DIF) using antibodies against IgG, IgM, IgA and C3.

Results

The predominant age group affected was 18-47 years (78.85%). Male:female ratio was 1:0.63. The most frequent glomerular lesion encountered was Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS, 36.54%) followed by lupus nephritis (26.92%) and IgA nephropathy (9.62%). The most common glomerular lesion in males was FSGS and that in females was lupus nephritis. DIF was mainly coarsely granular whenever present. One case of lupus nephritis and diabetic nephropathy, showed non specific IF. It was negative in all cases of FSGS, Minimal Change Disease (MCD) and renal amyloidosis. The IF helped in differentiating eight cases that were normal on light microscopy as IgA nephropathy (n=5) and authentic MCD (n=3). It helped in endorsing 19 cases of FSGS to be a progression of MCD. It was also of help in sub-typing all cases of Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis (MPGN) (n=3) as MPGN-Type I.

Conclusion

IF was of great help in diagnosing exact type of glomerulopathy in adult onset nephrotic syndrome and provided insight in its pathogenesis.

Keywords

Introduction

Adult onset nephrotic syndrome differs from paediatric nephrotic syndrome. The recurrence rates and response to steroids are more variable in adult onset nephrotic syndrome compared to paediatric nephrotic syndrome [1]. With the advent of renal biopsy, it is possible to have a good understanding of nephrotic syndrome in terms of specific diagnosis, prognosis and therapy [2]. Adult onset nephrotic syndrome is broadly divided into primary and secondary types with further subdivisions. However, the nephron reacts to variety of injurious agents with limited number of histopathological patterns of injury. Because of this a clinical syndrome can be associated with several histopathological patterns or single histopathological pattern may be linked to more than one syndrome. It is difficult to differentiate minimal lesions of glomerulonephritis from early membranous glomerulonephritis, IgA nephropathy and Focal Segmental Glomerosclerosis (FSGS) under light microscopy. In such cases, IF helps to straighten the diagnosis. Besides this, it can also enlighten on the pathogenesis of nephrotic syndrome. Some classifications of nephrotic syndrome are based on light microscopy but supplemented by electron microscopy and IF. In the present study, our aim was to determine a role of IF in evaluating definite subtyping and diagnosis of adult onset nephrotic syndrome and attempting clinicopathological correlation.

Materials and Methods

Clinical study and laboratory data:

This study was observational and hospital based. It was done in the Department of Pathology in collaboration with Department of Medicine of BJ Govt Medical College and Sasoon General Hospital, Pune. After clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee and obtaining informed consent, 52 prospectively registered patients of adult onset nephrotic syndrome, during a period of June 2012 to June 2014 were enrolled in the study. Patients with abnormal bleeding time and clotting time were excluded from the study.

Definition of adult onset nephrotic syndrome:

For the purpose of the study, adult onset nephrotic syndrome was defined as proteinuria greater than 3.5g/24 hours, serum albumin <25g/l, clinical evidence of peripheral oedema and patients presenting with these parameters for the first time after 18 years of age.

The patients were thoroughly evaluated clinically with special reference to urinary output, oedema, hypertension, history of diabetes, malaria, tuberculosis, collagen vascular diseases and nephrotoxic drug therapy. Routine urine analysis with microscopic examination of the sediment and urinary total proteins, haemoglobin, platelet count, bleeding time, clotting time, serum urea, serum creatinine were carried out. All patients were investigated with postprandial blood sugar levels. HBsAg, anti hepatitis C and HIV serology was also done. Selected patients with suspicion of systemic lupus erythematosus were investigated for antinuclear antibodies.

All patients were subjected to USG guided percutaneous renal biopsy under local anaesthesia with a 16 gauge biopsy gun, to obtain two cores of renal tissue. Patients were observed for 24 hours for biopsy related complications.

One core of biopsy was preserved in 10% formalin and processed for light microscopy and sectioned at 2 microns thickness and stained with haematoxylin and eosin stain and special stains like gomori methenamine silver, congo red, masson’s trichrome, Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) etc. Another core was preserved in phosphate buffer saline for IF and transported in cold box. It was then frozen sectioned at 4 microns on cryostat. IF was done by direct method using antibodies against IgG, IgM, IgA and C3. It was interpreted in terms of intensity, pattern and type of fluorescence. Clinicopathologic correlation was attempted.

Statistical Analysis

Data was expressed using descriptive statistics.

Results

The predominant age group affected was 18-47 years with 41 cases (78.85%) falling in this group. There was male preponderance with 32 males and 20 females with male:female ratio of 1:0.63.

On final light microscopy and IF evaluation the cases of adult onset nephrotic syndrome could be classified into primary and secondary categories. The results of IF examination have been given in [Table/Fig-1,2,3,4,5 and 6].

MPGN showing granular deposits - Immunofluorescence - Immunoglobulin G positive (40X).

IgA nephropathy: Mesangial positive Immunofluorescence - Immunoglobulin A positive (40X).

Lupus nephritis: Immunofluorescence Complement 3 positive (10X).

Lupus nephritis: Immunofluorescence - Immunoglobulin G positive (40X).

Pie diagram depicting classification of cases of adult onset nephrotic syndrome.

FSGS- Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, MCD- Minimal Change Disease, MPGN- Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis, MGN - Membranous Glomerulonephritis.

Bar diagram showing gender wise distribution of various glomerular lesions in adult onset nephrotic syndrome.

FSGS- Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, MCD- Minimal Change Disease, MPGN- Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis, MGN - Membranous Glomerulonephritis.

There were 32 cases (61.5%) of primary adult onset nephrotic syndrome and 20 cases (38.5%) of secondary adult onset nephrotic syndrome. Among the primary causes, FSGS (n=19) followed by IgA nephropathy (n=5) were the most common types. Among the secondary causes, lupus nephritis (n=14) followed by renal amyloidosis (n=4) were the most common types. Overall comparing the distribution of various subtypes of adult onset nephrotic syndrome FSGS (n=19) and lupus nephritis (n=14) were the most common [Table/Fig-5].

While comparing, gender wise distribution of various glomerular lesions in adult onset nephrotic syndrome, it was found that the most common lesion in males was FSGS while in females was lupus nephritis [Table/Fig-6].

Clinical presentation of various cases of adult onset nephrotic syndrome showed that the most common symptom was oedema (n=52) followed by hypertension (n=9) and oliguria (n=8) [Table/Fig-7].

Bar diagram showing clinical presentation of adult onset nephrotic syndrome.

In the present study progession towards renal failure was considered if serum creatinine was >1.4 mg/dl. It was found that all the patients of diabetic nephropathy, 80% cases of IgA nephropathy and 47.36% of patients with FSGS progressed to renal failure [Table/Fig-8].

Serum creatinine in various classes of adult onset nephrotic syndrome.

The DIF was negative in all cases of FSGS, MCD and renal amyloidosis and one case of lupus nephritis and diabetic nephropathy. All cases of MPGN showed IgG positivity which helped in subtyping these cases as Type I MPGN. Out of two cases of MGN, one case was positive for IgG and other for IgM. Also four cases of lupus nephritis showed positivity for all four antibodies used i.e., full house IF. In one case of lupus nephritis and diabetic nephropathy, non specific IF was noted [Table/Fig-9].

Clinicopathological correlation of various classes of glomerulopathies in adult onset nephrotic syndrome.

IgGIgMIgAC3All negativeAll positive (full house)
FSGS (n=19)----19 (100%)-
MCD (n=3)----3 (100%)-
MPGN (n=3)3 (100%)1 (33.3%)-2 (66.6%)--
MGN (n=2)1 (50%)1 (50%)----
IgA nephropathy (n=5)--5 (100%)---
Renal amylodosis (n=4)----4 (100%)-
Lupus nephritis (n=14)13 (92.8%)-1 (7.14%)1 (7.14%)1 (7.14%)4 (28.1%)
Diabetic nephropathy (n=2)1 (50%)---1 (50%)-

FSGS- Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, MCD- Minimal Change Disease, MPGN- Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis, MGN- Membranous Glomerulonephritis.


Discussion

The role of IF in evaluation of glomerular diseases most of which present as nephrotic syndrome need not be re-emphasized [3]. Immunologically mediated injury is an invariable mechanism of most of the glomerulopathies and detection of antibody mediated damage of renal tissue can be done by using IF microscopy. There can be two important mechanisms of this reaction. When antibody combines with intrinsic antigen of glomerulus, it imparts linear IF. On the other hand, when there is deposition of either in situ or circulating immune complexes formed with endogenous or extrinsic antigens, it shows a granular appearance [4].

FSGS is a heterogeneous disorder and may be present in primary form, secondary lesion and a complicating lesion. Its aetiology and pathogenesis is controversial. According to one school of thought, it’s a non specific change in broad range of primary and secondary glomerulopathies, while others believe it to be a separate entity or progression of MCD. In the present study, none of the cases of FSGS showed positive IF, thus helping us to differentiate them from IgA nephropathy, which have light microscopic features similar to FSGS. Careful clinicopathologic correlation has shown that none were associated with positive viral serology thereby ruling out possibility of secondary FSGS. A total of eight cases with microscopic haematuria can be attributed to complication of other type of glomerulopathy, particularly part of MCD spectrum and this possibility is most tenable in view of negative IF. Interestingly, 11 out of 19 cases (57.89%) of FSGS showed evidence of progression to renal failure, indicated by either raised serum creatinine (n=7) and/or raised blood urea nitrogen (n=4). Such clinical presentation in view of negative IF, endorses the view that FSGS can be a progression of minimal change glomerulopathy. Alternatively these and other cases can be considered FSGS as a separate entity as clinical features did not allow us to think of other non glomerular tubulointerstitial pathology [2].

There were three cases of MPGN on clinicopathologic correlation and light microscopic features, all belonged to MPGN Type I. IF particularly that for IgG helped in confirming the diagnosis.

There were two cases of MGN. On clinicopathological correlation, both were primary MGN. One of it showed IF for IgG and the other showed for IgM [5].

Multiple or full house IF was seen in four cases, all of which belonged to WHO class IV lupus nephritis. The other significant IF findings noted in lupus cases were presence of coarse granular IF for IgG in 13 cases. Negative IF was noted in one case graded as Grade I lupus nephritis. Diagnosis of lupus nephritis was based on clinicpathologic correlation and light microscopy findings. IF did not help additionally in diagnosis. Interestingly one case was negative for IF; such an occurrence has been mentioned in literature [6]. There were four cases of full house IF positivity which is well known to be associated with Class IV lesion of WHO classification of lupus nephritis. Positive granular IF explains the immune complex deposition which in case of SLE is due to circulating immune complexes.

Cases of renal amyloidosis as expected showed negative IF. Since IF for kappa and lambda chains was not used, these cases were bound to show negative IF.

Only one case out of two cases of diabetic nephropathy showed negative IF. The other case demonstrated ’non specific’ diffuse localisation of IgG which is considered to represent trapping of plasma proteins following mesangial or basement membrane dysfunction.

The frequency of various glomerulopathies in adult onset nephrotic syndrome in various studies is summarized in the [Table/Fig-10] [7-10].

The frequency of various glomerulopathies in adult onset nephrotic syndrome in various studies [7-10].

AR Reshi et al., [7]Narasimhan B et al., [8]Kazi Ji et al., [9]Rathi M et al., [10]Present Study
FSGS16.89%17%39.87%27.20%36.54%
MCD43.79%11.6%14.82%13.19%5.77%
MPGN2.06%3.7%4.71%15.93%5.77%
MGN13.4%9.8%26.58%21.70%3.85%
IgA Nephropathy1.37%8.6%2.53%1.65%9.62%
Renal Amylodosis0.68%--3.30%7.69%
Lupus Nephritis3.1%6.5%-6.87%26.92%
Diabetic Nephropathy4.48%2.5%-0.28%3.85%
Others14.13%29.6%7.14%--

Limitation

The study was conducted on 52 patients and this investigation should be carried out on more patients for better correlation. The other limitations are that it is a single centre based study, retrospective in nature and absence of electron microscopy to correlate our findings in a better way.

Conclusion

To summarize, IF helped in differentiating MCD from IgA nephropathy which had almost normal light microscopic appearance except for mild increase in mesangial cellularity. It also helped in endorsing 19 cases of FSGS to be a progression of minimal change glomerulopathy. We could also conclude that cases of MPGN were of Type 1 MPGN. Thus, IF was of great help in diagnosing exact type of glomerulopathy in adult onset nephrotic syndrome and provided insight in its pathogenesis.

FSGS- Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, MCD- Minimal Change Disease, MPGN- Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis, MGN- Membranous Glomerulonephritis.

References

[1]Arthur H, Cohen Cynthia C, Cast Anderson's book of pathology 1996 10th edMosby:2071-80.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Goldman L, Ausiello D, Glomerular disorders CECIL Textbook of Medicine 2004 22nd edPhiladelphiaElsevier:726-33.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Mills SE, Carter D, Greeson JK, Reuter VE, Stoler MH, Adult Renal diseases Sternberg's Diagnostic surgical pathology 2010 5th edPhiladelphiaLippincott Williams and Wilkins:1681-1756.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Rosai J, Urinary tract Rosai and Ackerman's Surgical Pathology 2011 10th edMissouriElsevier:1101-1286.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Schwartz MM, Membranous glomerulonephritis Heptinstall's pathology of the kidney 2007 6th edPhiladelphiaLippincott Williams & Wilkins:205-51.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Song LJ, Ding F, Liu HX, Shu Q, Yu X, Li J, Analysis of 15 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus manifesting with negative immunofluorescence anti-nuclear antibodies after treatment Lupus 2012 21(8):919-24.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Reshi AR, Bhat MA, Najar MS, Banday KA, Naik MA, Singh DP, Etiological profile of nephrotic syndrome in Kashmir Indian Journal of Nephrology 2008 18(1):9  [Google Scholar]

[8]Narasimhan B, Chacko B, John GT, Korula A, Kirubakaran MG, Jacob CK, Characterization of kidney lesions in Indian adults: towards a renal biopsy registry Journal of Nephrology 2006 19(2):205  [Google Scholar]

[9]Kazi JI, Mubarak M, Ahmed E, Akhter F, Naqvi SA, Rizvi SA, Spectrum of glomerulonephritides in adults with nephrotic syndrome in Pakistan Clinical and Experimental Nephrology 2009 13(1):38-43.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Rathi M, Bhagat RL, Mukhopadhyay P, Kohli HS, Jha V, Gupta KL, Changing histologic spectrum of adult nephrotic syndrome over five decades in north India A single centre experience Indian Journal of Nephrology 2014 24(2):86  [Google Scholar]