JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Internal Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24405.9617
Year : 2017 | Month : Apr | Volume : 11 | Issue : 04 Full Version Page : OC14 - OC16

Effect of Ranolazine in Patients with Chest Pain and Normal Coronaries- A Hospital Based Study

Swapan Saha1, Tony Ete2, Manish Kapoor3, Pravin Kumar Jha4, Rinchin Dorjee Megeji5, Gaurav Kavi6, Synrang Batngen Warjri7, Animesh Mishra8

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, India.
2 Senior Resident, Department of Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, India.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, India.
4 Senior Resident, Department of Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, India.
5 Senior Resident, Department of Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, India.
6 Senior Resident, Department of Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, India.
7 Senior Resident, Department of Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, India.
8 Professor and Head, Department of Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Tony Ete, Senior Resident, Department of Cardiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong-793018, Meghalaya, India.
E-mail: tonyete14@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

There is an important role of coronary microcirculation in the clinical presentation and prognosis of patients who have typical chest pain despite normal epicardial coronary arteries (microvascular angina). Treatment of these patients is empirical because of the incomplete knowledge of its cause. Limited data has shown that ranolazine reduces angina and improves exercise performance in such patients with frequent angina.

Aim

To evaluate the effect of ranolazine in patients with chest pain and normal epicardial coronaries (micro-vascular angina).

Materials and Methods

Sixty-five patients with anginal symptoms with abnormal exercise stress test and normal epicardial coronaries were enrolled for the study. All participants had baseline demographic and health history questionnaires, including Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). After enrolment, patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group (group 1) was assigned to ranolazine for six weeks along with other indicated anti-anginal drugs. The other group (group 2) was assigned to anti-anginal drugs other than ranolazine. Patients were reassessed for symptomatic and functional improvement (SAQ, DASI) at six weeks.

Results

Mean age of patients examined were 49.03 years in group 1 and 49.77 years in group 2. Approximately 42.9% of patients in group 1 and 40% in group 2 were male. Despite current anti-anginal therapy, patients in both the groups were symptomatic. At six weeks, 60% of patients in group 1 had angina as compared to 88.6% at baseline (p<0.05). Similarly, scores of domains of SAQ were higher at six weeks as compared to baseline (p<0.05) except for treatment satisfaction. No improvement of DASI score and functional capacity were seen in either group at six weeks as compared to baseline (p>0.05). At six weeks, angina was significantly lower in group 1 as compared to group 2 (60 % vs 86.7%; p<0.05). Four out of five SAQ subscale score were higher in ranolazine group as compared to the other group (p<0.05). Treatment satisfaction trended lower on ranolazine group (p<0.05). There was no significant differences in DASI in the two groups (DASI score 30.59 vs 29.85, p>0.05).

Conclusion

Ranolazine is safe and improves symptoms significantly in patients with micro-vascular angina.

Keywords

Introduction

Although the association between myocardial ischaemia and atherosclerotic coronary artery disease is well-known, several previous studies have demonstrated the importance of coronary microcirculation in the clinical presentation and prognosis of patients presenting with typical chest pain despite normal epicardial coronaries in angiogram (Micro-Vascular Angina {MVA}) [1]. As the knowledge regarding the aetiology of MVA is limited, treatment of such patients is largely empirical [2].

Patients with persisting symptoms despite optimal anti-ischaemic drug therapy, several alternative forms of treatment have been proposed. Ranolazine is an anti-anginal drug shown to reduce angina and improve exercise performance in selected patients with positive exercise testing and normal epicardial coronaries with frequent angina. It is proposed that ranolazine causes maintenance of sodium-calcium homeostasis by reducing sodium entry into myocardial cells through sodium channels [3]. The current study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of ranolazine in patients with micro-vascular angina.

Materials and Methods

This prospective observational study was carried out from August 2015 to July 2016.

Sixty-five patients with anginal symptoms (or angina equivalent) with abnormal exercise stress test and normal epicardial coronaries were enrolled for the study.

Inclusion criteria:

Anginal chest pain or dyspnoea on exertion;

Abnormal routine exercise stress testing;

No obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (<50% epicardial coronary stenosis in all epicardial coronary arteries).

Exclusion criteria:

Patients younger than 18 years of age;

Hepatic insufficiency, prolonged QT interval, renal failure;

Use of drugs that inhibit CYP3A such as diltiazem, verapamil, ketoconazole, macrolides and protease inhibitors;

Patients taking drugs that prolong QT interval;

Pregnancy or breastfeeding;

Parkinson’s disease;

Life expectancy <6 months.

Written informed consent was taken from all subjects before study participation. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institute. Baseline screening 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG), 2D echocardiogram for left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion abnormality and routine blood investigation was done in each patient. All participants had baseline demographic and health history questionnaires, including Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). After enrollment in the study, patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group of participants (Group 1, n=35) was assigned to ranolazine 500 mg orally twice daily for two weeks and then 1,000 mg twice daily (as per US FDA, Feb 2003) for an additional 4weeks along with other indicated anti-anginal drugs. The other group of participants (Group 2, n=30) were on the usual prescribed anti-anginal drugs other than ranolazine. It was ensured that the participants’ usual anti-anginal medication regimen remained unchanged in both the groups throughout study duration. Patients were reassessed for symptomatic and functional improvement (SAQ, DASI) at six weeks in both groups and results were compared. The SAQ is a self-administered, 19-item questionnaire. It measures five dimensions of anginal symptoms like physical functioning, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction and quality of life. Scores range from 0-100 in each domain, with higher scores indicating better levels of functioning. Similarly, DASI is a 12-item self-administered questionnaire having specific points for each activity with total 58.2 points (DASI score). Functional capacity in Metabolic Equivalents (METS) is calculated by the formula

Functional Capacity in METS = (DASI score) x 0.43+9.6 then divide by 3.5

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were calculated by two sample t-test. The significance (p-value) of the variables during follow-up was calculated by Z-test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results

Sixty-five patients after enrollment were divided in to two groups. Group 1 (n=35) were assigned to ranolazine in addition to usual anti-ischaemic therapy and group 2 (n=30) were assigned to only usual anti-ischaemic therapy.

Baseline characteristics of patients in group 1 & 2 are shown in [Table/Fig-1].

Baseline characteristics of two groups.

VariablesGroup 1(n=35)Group 2 (n=30)p-value
Mean age (years)49.0349.770.573
Male15 (42.9%)12 (40%)0.8157
Risk Factors Hypertension Diabetes Dyslipidemia Smoking13 (37.1%)4 (11.4%)10 (28.6%)8 (22.9%)11 (36.7%)7 (23.3%)9 (30%)6 (20%)0.9680.2010.8990.779
Symptoms (%) Angina Dyspnoea31 (88.6%)9 (25.7%)26 (86.7%)7 (23.3%)0.8150.824
DASI ScoreFunctional capacity (METS)28.986.28296.280.9821
Seattle AnginaQuestionnaire (SAQ) Physical functioning Angina stability Angina frequency Treatment satisfaction Quality of life84.451.370.891.366.784.451.370.289.765.40.9480.9780.4370.0300.064

Despite current anti-anginal therapy, majority of patients in both groups were symptomatic [Table/Fig-1]. Mean DASI score with functional capacity and mean scores in the five domains of SAQ in group 1 and 2 at baseline is shown in [Table/Fig-1].

At six week, patients in group 1 had significant reduction in angina symptoms as compared to baseline [Table/Fig-2]. Similarly, domains of SAQ were significantly better in group 1 at six weeks except treatment satisfaction which was significantly less. [Table/Fig-2].

Comparison in each group before and after starting treatment (baseline and six weeks).

VariablesGroup 1 (n=35)Group 2 (n=30)
BaselineAt six weeksp-valueBaselineAt six weeksp-value
Angina31 (88.6%)21 (60%)<0.0526 (86.7%)26 (86.7%)1
Dyspnoea9 (25.7%)5 (14.3%)0.277 (23.3%)5 (16.7%)0.52
DASI28.9830.590.072929.850.37
Functional capacity (METS)6.286.470.086.286.380.39
SAQ:Physical functioningAngina stabilityAngina frequencyTreatment satisfactionQuality of life84.451.370.891.3166.790.9174.0385.5185.2675.73<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.0584.4351.3370.2789.7365.4385.4355.2376.0389.0770.80.053<0.05<0.050.22<0.05

Symptomatic and functional status along with the domains of SAQ in group 2 at six weeks as compared to baseline is also shown in [Table/Fig-2].

Comparison between two groups at six weeks

After six weeks, patients in group 1 had significant reduction in anginal symptom as compared to group 2 (p<0.05) [Table/Fig-3].

Comparison between two groups at 6 weeks.

VariablesGroup 1(n=35)Group 2 (n=30)p-value
Angina21 (60%)26 (86.7%)0.016
Dyspnoea5 (14.3%)5 (16.7%)0.790
DASI Score30.5929.850.385
Functional capacity (METS)6.476.380.397
SAQPhysical functioningAngina stabilityAngina frequencyTreatment satisfactionQuality of life90.9174.0385.5185.2675.7185.4355.2376.0389.0770.8<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05

Moreover, four out of five SAQ subscale score were higher in ranolazine group as compared to the other group (p<0.05). However, mean DASI score and functional capacity in group 1 and 2 after six weeks did not show significant difference. [Table/Fig-3].

Discussion

Although MVA is not discernible from angina of obstructive CAD, it persists longer after exertion and shows poor response to nitroglycerin [4,5]. Exercise ECG and scintigraphic stress tests also are not remarkable for its diagnosis. However, appearance of angina or ST-T changes occurring during echocardiography stress test may suggests MVA [6,7]. Similarly, earlier appearance of ECG changes or angina during exercise test with sublingual nitrate administration may also give clue towards MVA [8].

Prevalence of microvascular dysfunction is more common in female as compared to male. Moreover, pain may be disabling in women and there are unpredictable responses with use of conventional anti-ischemic therapy [2]. Women with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischaemia often have no obstructive CAD by invasive coronary angiography when compared to men. NHLBI WISE study demonstrated that approximately 50% of women with symptoms of persistent chest pain, evidence of ischaemia and presence of no obstructive CAD, have microvascular dysfunction [9]. In the present study also, almost two third of the patients (60%) were female with persistent symptoms.

In our study, hypertension and dyslipidaemia were present in about one third of patients in both the groups. However, diabetes and history of smoking were less common and there was no statistical difference between the two groups. As per characterization of MVA, no cardiac or systemic diseases should be apparent in these patients. However, patients with uncomplicated hypertension or diabetes mellitus are included as they are considered as risk-factors for coronary microvascular dysfunction like in coronary atherosclerosis [1,10].

Despite current medications, all the patients in both groups were symptomatic at baseline, angina on exertion being the most prominent symptom. As per literature, patients with microvascular dysfunction present with angina episodes that are primarily related to effort. At baseline, symptom and functional status (DASI and SAQ) in the two groups were comparable. In this study, we compared angina symptoms and functional status after six weeks of treatment, in the group taking ranolazine with the group not taking the same, using SAQ and DASI. The SAQ questionnaire is well validated in stable coronary heart disease patients [11]. It provides important information for patients with angina. Higher scores indicate better levels of functioning and quality of life. Similarly, DASI has also been validated as a measure of functional capacity [12]. Angina and thereby ischaemia predict adverse cardiovascular events in patients with and without obstructive CAD [9,13,14]. Ranolazine has been established as an effective anti-anginal drug in patients with obstructive CAD and there is evidence that it improves ischaemia [15]. In our study, patients with angina, evidence of ischaemia and no obstructive CAD had significant benefit from ranolazine compared to patients without ranolazine. At six weeks, angina symptoms were significantly lower in the group of patients taking ranolazine. Similarly, scores of domains of SAQ were higher at six weeks as compared to baseline. While comparing the two groups at six weeks, angina was significantly lower in ranolazine group as compared to no ranolazine group. SAQ sub-scale score were also higher in ranolazine group as compared to the other group. However, treatment satisfaction trended in a negative direction on ranolazine. This may be because of patients’ expectation that ranolazine would provide a complete relief of angina or could be related to side-effects of ranolazine, although all subjects completed the study period with no drop-outs. Previous studies like Chaitman et al., (CARISA study) showed that ranolazine improved symptoms of myocardial ischaemia and quality of life in patients with MVA. The CARISA study also demonstrated that addition of ranolazine in women had similar reductions in angina frequency and nitroglycerin use as in men [16]. Similarly, analysis from the MERLIN–TIMI 36 study showed that women had less obstructive CAD compared with men and had 29% reduction in recurrent ischaemia on ranolazine compared with placebo [17].

Limitation

Our study was conducted enrolling a small number of patients in either group over a short period of time. Therefore this is limited, with regard to definitive statement, regarding the role of ranolazine as anti-ischaemic therapy in patients with MVA. Moreover, the potential for influence on certain aspects of our study design remain plausible including patient familiarity with the treatment protocol, which remains unaccounted for in our data analysis. Thirdly, although SAQ measures chest pain and shortness of breathe to evaluate angina, many patients with ischaemia experience anginal equivalents such as fatigue, indigestion, and weakness which cannot be measured by SAQ.

Conclusion

In MVA patients with persistent symptoms, despite optimal anti-ischaemic drug therapy, several alternative forms of treatment have been proposed. As novel anti-anginal, anti-ischemic medication, ranolazine is safe, well tolerated and improves symptoms in patients with MVA.

References

[1]Camici PG, Crea F, Coronary microvascular dysfunction N Engl J Med 2007 356:830-40.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Cannon RO, Epstein SE, Microvascular angina as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries Am J Cardiol 1988 61:1338-43.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Belardinelli L, Shryock JC, Fraser H, The mechanism of ranolazine action to reduce ischemia-induced diastolic dysfunction Eur Heart J Suppl 2006 8(suppl A):A10-13.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Kaski JC, Rosano GMC, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA, Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function: long-term follow-up study J Am Coll Cardiol 1995 25:807-14.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Lamendola P, Lanza GA, Spinelli A, Sgueglia GA, Di Monaco A, Barone L, Long-term prognosis of patients with cardiac syndrome X Int J Cardiol 2010 140:197-99.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Van’t Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F, Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group Circulation 1998 97:2302-06.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Barouch LA, Schulman SP, Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction Circulation 1998 97:765-72.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Lanza GA, Manzoli A, Bia E, Crea F, Maseri A, Acute effects of nitrates on exercise testing in patients with syndrome X Circulation 1994 90:2695-700.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Buchthal SD, Prognosis in women with myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary disease: results from the National Institutes of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Circulation 2004 109:2993-99.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Lanza GA, Cardiac syndrome X: a critical overview and future perspectives Heart 2007 93:159-66.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 1995 25:333-41.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index) Am J Cardiol 1989 64:651-54.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Pepine CJ, Ischemic heart disease in women J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 47(3 Suppl):S1-3.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Gulati M, Cooper-DeHoff RM, McClure C, Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project Arch Intern Med 2009 169:843-50.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Chaitman BR, Ranolazine for the treatment of chronic angina and potential use in other cardiovascular conditions Circulation 2006 113:2462-72.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Chaitman BR, Pepine CJ, Parker JO, Combination Assessment Of Ranolazine In Stable Angina (CARISA) Investigators. Effects of ranolazine with atenolol, amlodipine, or diltiazem on exercise tolerance and angina frequency in patients with severe chronic angina: A randomized controlled trial JAMA 2004 291(3):309-16.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Mega JL, Hochman JS, Scirica BM, Clinical features and outcomes of women with unstable ischemic heart disease: observations from metabolic efficiency with ranolazine for less ischemia in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 36 (MERLINTIMI 36) Circulation 2010 121:1809-17.  [Google Scholar]