JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Community Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23919.9428
Year : 2017 | Month : Feb | Volume : 11 | Issue : 02 Full Version Page : LC01 - LC04

A Study to Find Out the Full Immunization Coverage of 12 to 23-month old Children and Areas of Under-Performance using LQAS Technique in a Rural Area of Tripura

Anjan Datta1, Subrata Baidya2, Srabani Datta3, Chanda Mog4, Shampa Das5

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Tripura Medical College and Dr. BRAM Teaching Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Agartala Government Medical College and G B Pant Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India.
3 Assistant Director, Monitoring and Evaluation, Tripura State AIDS Control Society, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of Tripura, India.
4 Senior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Agartala Government Medical College and G B Pant Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India.
5 Senior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Agartala Government Medical College and G B Pant Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Anjan Datta, Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Tripura Medical College and Dr. BRAM Teaching Hospital, Hapania- 799014, Agartala, Tripura, India.
E-mail: dranjandatta86@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

It is very important to analyze the factors which acts as obstacle in achieving 100% immunization among children. Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) is one of the effective method to assess such barriers.

Aim

To assess the full immunization coverage among 12 to 23-month old children of rural field practice area under Department of Community Medicine, Agartala Government Medical College and identify the factors for failure of full immunization.

Materials and Methods

A community based cross-divtional study was conducted from November 2013 to October 2014 on children aged 12 to 23 months old of area under Mohanpur Community health centre. Using LQAS technique 330 samples were selected with multi-stage sampling, each sub-centre being one lot and two calculated to be the decision value. Data was collected using pre-designed pre-tested questionnaire during home visit and verifying immunization card and analysed by computer software SPSS version 21.0.

Results

The full immunization coverage among 12 to 23 months old children of Mohanpur area was found as 91.67%. Out of all the 22 sub-centres, 36.36% was found under performing as per pre-fixed criteria and the main reasons for failure of full immunization in those areas are unawareness of need of subsequent doses of vaccines and illness of the children.

Conclusion

LQAS is an effective method to identify areas of under-performance even though overall full immunization coverage is high.

Keywords

Introduction

Immunization is the process of development of protective response of an individual’s body to a specific disease by introducing an immunizing agent. Immunizing agents may be classified as vaccines, anti-sera and immunoglobulins (Igs).

Vaccine is an immuno-biological substance designed to produce specific protection against a given disease. It stimulates the production of protective antibody [1].

Immunization coverage is the most important strategy adopted by child survival programs throughout the world. Roughly 3 million children die each year of vaccine preventable diseases, with a dis-proportionate number of these children residing in developing countries [2].

Various studies have also shown that, Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) technique has few advantages over WHO EPI 30-cluster sampling technique. For example, in 30-cluster sampling the low performing clusters cannot be identified but performance at the level of individual lot can be identified by LQAS technique. Again LQAS technique allows interpreting data as soon as data are collected whereas, in EPI 30-cluster sampling technique data from all units have to be collected. Moreover, in LQAS technique level of accuracy and confidence can be set as per requirement unlike EPI 30-cluster sampling technique [3].

Universal Immunization Programme in India reveals a coverage below 50 percent in most populous states of the country (Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal) and most of the health indicators to be low in states where immunization coverage is low [4]. Whereas, National Family Health Survey-3 (NFHS-3) [5] and presentation to National Programme Coordination Committee on state PIP of Tripura [6] reveals that percentage of children fully immunized in Tripura is 49.7% and 75% respectively. Again DLHS-4 (2012-13) shows, full immunization coverage of West Tripura district (where the present study has been conducted) is 38.5% overall and in rural areas, 28.6% [7] showing heterogeneity of state and national figures demanding a study like present one. So this study was conducted to assess immunization coverage among 12 to 23-month old children of rural field practice area in Agartala.

Materials and Methods

The present study was a community based cross-sectional study conducted in area under Mohanpur Community Health Centre (CHC), the rural field practice area of Department of Community Medicine, Agartala Government Medical College. All 22 sub-centres were selected for the purpose of the study and the study population comprised of children between 12 to 23 months, residing in area under Mohanpur Community Health Centre (CHC). The study was conducted for a period of one year (November 2013 to October 2014).

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated by following methods-

At ±5% level of accuracy and 95% Confidence Interval (CI), the first estimate of total sample size was made as 384, using Lemeshow and Taber LQAS table [3].

Estimation of target population= total population× birth rate of state in rural×(1 – infant mortality rate of the state, rural) ÷1000

Total population under Mohanpur CHC area is 1, 04,830.

(Birth rate of Tripura, rural areas= 15.6 per 1000 population

Infant mortality rate of Tripura, rural areas=29 per 1000 live births) [8]

Therefore, target population = 104830×15.6×(1-29÷1000) ÷1000 = 1588.

Sampling fraction (%) = 384÷1588 ×100= 24.181%.

Revised total sample size = 384÷ 1.241 = 309.4 (approximately 310).

Minimum lot sample size = revised total sample size÷ number of lot = 310÷ 22 = 14.09.

Therefore, 15 children have been selected from each lot.

Final sample size = 15× 22 = 330.

A low threshold level set as 65%, which means the lots showing full immunization coverage less than 65% are under-performing.

A high threshold level set as 95% which is near to desirable level of coverage.

A decision value of 2 was calculated from pre-designed standard statistical table from WHO guideline [3].

Informed consent: A duly explained, written consent, translated by trained personnel into local language (Bengali) was taken from all the parents before including them in the study.

Ethical consideration was taken from the Institutional Ethics committee, Agartala Government Medical College before commencement of the study.

Sampling technique: Out of all the eight districts in Tripura, West Tripura district was selected for the purpose of the present study. Out of total three sub-divisions under West Tripura, Mohanpur sub-division was selected using lottery method. Again by lottery method 15 children of 12 to 23 months age from each sub-centre were selected from the immunization register available at each sub-centre. And information regarding their immunization status was verified by visiting their homes.

Operational definitions

Full immunization: Defined as immunization of a child with one dose of Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG), 3 doses of Diphtheria Pertussis and Tetanus (DPT), Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV), Hepatitis B Vaccine and one dose of Measles vaccine within the age of one year.

Lot: Each Sub-centre within Mohanpur CHC area was considered as one Lot in the present study.

Data collection

Data was collected by using a pre-designed and pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaire and immunization cards have been verified physically to confirm appropriate date of vaccination. In those patients where immunization card was not available verification was done based on examining BCG scar and interviewing the respondent during the home visit for every child.

Stastical Analysis

Analysis was done using software SPSS version 21.0. Chi square test, Fisher’s-Exact test have been used to see the significant association between different variables as and when required.

Results

The present study showed that, out of the total 330 children between 12-23 months age group, 197 (59.7%) were male and 133 (40.3%) were female. Mother was the respondent in 319 (96.7%) cases (father was interviewed where mother was not available at the time of home visit). Among them, 230 (69.7%) were Hindu by religion and 188 (57%) belonged to Scheduled Tribe (ST) caste. Majority of the fathers (163, 49.40%) had primary education and mothers, secondary education (156, 47.30%). Father’s occupation for majority of them (133, 40.30%) was farmer/fisherman/agriculture, followed by unskilled labourer (85, 25.80%) whereas, 258 (78.20%) of their mothers were housewives. According to modified B G Prasad’s scale, maximum (189, 57.30%) children belonged to Socio-Economic Status (SES) class IV. The birth order of majority (190, 57.60%) of the children were first and 251 (76.1%) of them were delivered at institution.

[Table/Fig-1] shows that out of the total 22 lots under Mohanpur CHC, eight (36.36%) were rejected. It also reveals that the total estimated coverage of full immunization for children under Mohanpur CHC was, 0.9167 x 100% = 91.67%.

Lot Quality Coverage Survey 3 of Full Immunization of Mohanpur area.

Lot nameLot population(a)Weightage factor (b)*Lot sample size (c)No. of fully immunized children (d)Proportion immunized (e)#Estimated coverage (f)
Rangachara94010.0871151510.0871
Taranagar East77400.0717151510.0717
Taranagar West97250.0901151510.0901
Kamalghat51200.0474151510.0474
Laxmipara60140.0557151510.0557
Damdamia24510.0227151510.0227
Nepalibasti21410.01981512 (R)0.80.0158
Rajghat24100.02231512 (R)0.80.0178
Lefunga34660.032115140.93330.03
U.D. Nagar18800.017415130.86660.0151
Tulabagan28820.026715140.93330.0249
Tamakari86520.08021512 (R)0.80.0642
Gopal Nagar41070.038151510.038
Budhjung Nagar24470.0226151510.0226
Abhicharan50290.04661512 (R)0.80.0373
Barkathal37300.03451512 (R)0.80.0276
Balurband46410.0431512 (R)0.80.0344
Hezamara55090.05115140.93330.0476
Gamchakobra62980.0584151510.0584
Kambukchara13150.01221512 (R)0.80.0098
Chachubazar103320.09581512 (R)0.80.0766
Tairajbari25400.023515140.93330.0219
Total Estimated Coverage0.9167

* Weightage factor (b) = Lot population (a) ÷ Total population

# Proportion immunized (e) = Number of fully immunized (d) ÷ Lot sample size (c)

Estimated coverage (f) = Weightage factor (b) x Proportion immunized (e)

(R) = Lot rejected (number of chil dren not fully immunized > 2).


Main reasons for failure of full immunization as shown in [Table/Fig-2] were, unawareness of need to return for second and third dose of vaccines (26.7%), illness of the child- not brought for immunization (26.7%), followed by fear of side reactions (20%) etc. The variables, found to have significant association with full immunization status of children in univariate analysis were religion of the child, social caste, Father’s literacy status, Father’s occupation and place of delivery of child [Table/Fig-3]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis [Table/Fig-4] with the variables found significant in univariate analysis showed that, children who belonged to General caste, had poor educational status of father (primary education) and were delivered at home have significantly lesser odds of being fully immunized then those belonging to Scheduled Caste (SC) and Other Backward Caste (OBC) caste, whose father’s education were secondary level and above and those who are institutionally delivered respectively.

Reason for failure of full immunization of the child.

VariablesFrequencyPercent
Unawareness of need of immunization13.3%
Unawareness of need to return for second and third dose826.7%
Fear of side reactions620%
Wrong ideas about immunization13.3%
Postponing until another time26.7%
Child was ill- not brought826.7%
Child was ill- brought but vaccine was not given413.3%
Total30100.0%

Distribution of socio-demographic variables and variables of full immunization coverage assessment according to full immunization status of the children under study.

VariablesCategory of variablesFull immunizationTotalSignificance
YesNo
Sex of the ChildMale182151970.256
Female11815133
RespondentMother291283190.286
Father9211
Religion of the ChildHindu215152300.003
Christian771188
Buddhist8412
Social CasteGeneral413440.004
ST16226188
SC50151
OBC47047
Literacy Status of FatherIlliterate140140.002
Literate15520
Primary Education14221163
Secondary Education1134117
Higher Secondary Education16016
Literacy Status of MotherIlliterate132150.889
Literate606
Primary Education13714151
Secondary Education14214156
Higher Secondary Education202
Occupation of the FatherUnskilled Labourer805850.011
Skilled Labourer808
Farmer/Fisherman/Agricultural Enterprise11221133
Business79483
Service21021
Occupation of the MotherHousehold Work232262580.212
Unskilled Labour28028
Farmer/Fishing/Agricultural Enterprise40444
Socio-economic statusClass III9281000.125
Class IV16722189
Class II39039
Class V202
Birth Order of the Child1170201900.488
212510135
3505
Place of DeliveryHome582179<0.001
Institutional2429251

SES- Socio-Economic Status


Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors found to be significant in univariate analysis.

Variablesp valueOdds Ratio(95% Confidence Interval)
Religion of the child
Hindu0.092.377(0.85 – 6.644)
Christian and Buddhist*---
Social Caste
General0.0430.078(0.007 – 0.92)
ST0.2490.275(0.031 – 2.47)
SC and OBC*---
Literacy Status of Father
Illiterate and Literate0.0610.149(0.02 – 1.088)
Primary Education0.040.187(0.038 – 0.926)
Secondary Education and above*---
Occupation of Father
Unskilled and Skilled Labourer*0.1194.553(0.676 – 30.660)
Farmer/fisherman/agriculture0.8591.155(0.234 – 5.712)
Business and Service*---
Place of Delivery of child
Home<0.0010.093(0.034 – 0.252)
Institution---

* Variables which are merged together to avoid ‘nil’ entries in various cells of the table.

“–” Reference variable


Discussion

This present study revealed that out of the total 330 study children, majority (59.7%) were males unlike a previous similar study conducted in Iran [9]. Mother was the respondent in 96.7% of cases in the present study, similar to the study by Karinagannanavar A et al., in Bellary district [10]. In their study, majority of the children were hindu (85.30%), similar to the present study, but 14.3% were muslims which is none in case of the present study, probably because of very less muslim population in the study area and difference in ethnicity of the study population. Educational status of the respondents in the present study was found to be better than similar other studies.

In this study, most of the children belonged to SES class IV (57.30%) as per modified BG Prasad’s scale, still institutional delivery was found to be much higher (76.1%) than that in the study by Karinagannanavar A et al., in Bellary District [10].

The present study showed that under Mohanpur CHC, 36.36% lots were under-performing even though full immunization coverage was 91.67% whereas, similar other studies [1115] revealed, full immunization coverage to be 62.7%, 63.3%, 44.1%, 75% and 84.21% respectively which clearly shows that the full immunization coverage of area under Mohanpur CHC assessed by using LQAS technique is much higher than the overall state, national figures and similar various other studies done throughout the country. To assess the application of LQAS technique to measure immunization coverage identify the areas of high and low coverage, the study conducted by Pradeep BS et al., in Bangalore concluded that LQAS can be used as an effective tool to monitor routine immunization activity and it would decrease the time taken for evaluation of immunization coverage [15]. Punith K et al., in their study at Mathikere Urban Health Centre of Bangalore, have showed that, considering the time and resources required, LQAS was better in evaluating primary immunization coverage than cluster sampling [16].

The principal reasons for failure of full immunization found in the present study were, unawareness of need to return for second and third dose of vaccines (26.7%) and illness of the child (26.7%), similar to what Vohra et al., and Bholanath et al., revealed in their studies [11,13]. Again similar results were cited by Prabhakaran Nair et al., Punith et al., and Saxena et al., in their respective studies [14,16,17]. General caste, poor educational status of father and home delivery are the risk factors found significantly associated with failure of full immunization of the child in the present study. This shows even though study settings are different, the primary reasons for failure of full immunization status remains similar all over the country.

Limitation

The target population was not adequate as per the precision set for this study using LQAS technique as the revised sampling fraction was more than 10% (usually in LQAS technique <10% sampling fraction is taken). To overcome this, a larger target population has to be considered in future for similar studies. Another limitation was the sampling frame of different lots were designed based on the immunization register available at each sub-centre and not by home visit, which might have led to bias if children without full immunization were not registered properly and could have overestimated the coverage of full immunization. Recall bias from the respondents who could not produce immunization card and no BCG scars found was another limitation that could be identified.

Conclusion

This present study shows that although the overall full immunization coverage among the children of Mohanpur CHC area is high, there are many (36.36%) pockets of under immunization, the primary reasons being unawareness of need to return for second and third dose of vaccines and illness of the child. This reveals that LQAS method is an effective one to identify specific areas of under-performance even if the overall performance is satisfactory to evaluate health programmes at community level.

* Weightage factor (b) = Lot population (a) ÷ Total population# Proportion immunized (e) = Number of fully immunized (d) ÷ Lot sample size (c) Estimated coverage (f) = Weightage factor (b) x Proportion immunized (e)(R) = Lot rejected (number of chil dren not fully immunized > 2).SES- Socio-Economic Status* Variables which are merged together to avoid ‘nil’ entries in various cells of the table.“–” Reference variable

References

[1]Park K, Park’s Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine 2009 20th EditionJabalpurBanarasidas Bhanot:98-113.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Kane M, Lasher H, The case for childhood immunization Children’s vaccine program at PATH: Occasional paper. Seattle, Washington. [Online] 2002 Mar [Last accessed 2016 June 11] 5:2-15.Available from www.path.org/vaccinereis/files/CVP_Occ_Paper5.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[3]WHO: Monitoring immunisation services using the lot quality technique. WHO global programme for vaccines and immunisation, vaccine research and development, Geneva. 1996;1-57  [Google Scholar]

[4]UNICEF. Coverage evaluation survey: All India report [Online]. 2009 [Last accessed 2016 May 25]. Available from: http://files.givewell.org/files/DWDA%202009/GAIN/UNICEF%20India%20Coverage%20Evaluation%20Survey%20(2009).pdf  [Google Scholar]

[5]Key indicators for India from NFHS-3 [Online]. 2005-6 [Last accessed 2016 June 11]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/pdf/India.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[6]National Rural Health Mission. Presentation to national program coordination committee: on state PIP of Tripura for 2011-12, 2nd May 2011[Online]. 2011 May 25 [Last accessed 2016 May 31]. Available from: http://www.ebookbrowse.com/npcc-tripura-2011-2012-pdf-d153161549  [Google Scholar]

[7]State fact sheet, Tripura. District level household and facility survey-4. Ministry of health and family welfare. International institute of population sciences (Deemed university), Mumbai. [Online] 2013-14 [Last accessed 2016 Jun 10]. Available from http://rchiips.org/pdf/dlhs4/report/TR.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[8]SRS bulletin. Sample registration system. Registrar general, India. 2011;46(1)1-6  [Google Scholar]

[9]Almasi H, Gilasi H, Moradi A, Immunization coverage in the measles-rubella control mass campaign in Kashan, Iran Pak J of Biological Sciences 2006 9(3):558-62.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Karinagannanavar A, Khan W, Raghavendra B, Sameena ARB, Goud TG, A study of measles vaccination coverage by lot quality assurance sampling technique and factors related to non-vaccination in bellary district Indian J of Community Health 2013 25(3):244-50.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Vohra R, Vohra A, Bhardwaj P, Srivastava JP, Gupta P, Reasons for failure of immunization: A cross-sectional study among 12-23-month old children of lucknow, India Adv Biomed Res 2013 2(3):1-5.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Singh P, Yadav RJ, Immunization status of children of India Indian Pediatr 2000 37(11):1194-99.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Nath B, Singh JV, Awasthi S, Bhushan V, Kumar V, Singh SK, A study on determinants of immunization coverage among 12-23 months old children in urban slums of Lucknow district, India Indian j Med Sci 2007 61:598-606.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Prabhakaran Nair TN, Varughese E, Immunization coverage of infants-rural-urban difference in kerala Indian Pediatrics 1994 31:139-43.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Pradeep BS, Gangaboraiah Usha S, Evaluation of immunization coverage by lot quality assurance sampling in a primary health center area The Internet J of Public Health 2009 1(1):1-6.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Punith K, Lalitha K, Suman G, Pradeep BS, Jayanth Kumar K, Evaluation of primary immunization coverage of infants under universal immunization programme in an urban area of Bangalore city using cluster sampling and lot quality assurance sampling techniques Indian J of Community Medicine 2008 33(3):151-55.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Saxena P, Prakash D, Saxena V, Kansal S, Assessment of routine immunization in urban slums of agra district Indian J PrevSoc Med 2008 39:60-62.  [Google Scholar]