JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Anaesthesia Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24002.9235
Year : 2017 | Month : Jan | Volume : 11 | Issue : 01 Full Version Page : UC01 - UC08

Use of Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Craniotomies

Nalini Jadhav1, Nilesh Wasekar2, Vinayak Wagaskar3, Bharati Kondwilkar4, Rajesh Patil5

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, JJ Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Haematology, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharshtra, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharshtra, India.
4 Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesia, JJ Hospital, Mumbai, Maharshtra, India.
5 Super-Specialty Medical Officer, Department of Haematology, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharshtra, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Nilesh Wasekar, Department of Anaesthesia, JJ Campus Byculla-400012, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: nileshwasekar@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

The neuroanaesthesia ensures stable perioperative cerebral haemodynamics, avoids sudden rise in intracranial pressure and prevents acute brain swelling. The clinical characteristics of dexmeditomidine make this intravenous agent a potentially attractive adjunct for neuroanaesthesia and in the neurological intensive care unit.

Aim

This study aimed to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative haemodynamic stability and to assess the intraoperative requirements of analgesic and other anaesthetic agents, and also to assess postoperative sedation, respiratory depression and any other side effects of dexmedetomidine as compared to placebo.

Materials and Methods

This prospective randomized study was done in 60 patients of either sex, age between 18 to 60 years and American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) Grade I and II undergoing elective craniotomies under General Anaesthesia (GA) for intracranial Space Occupying Lesion (SOL). These 60 patients underwent thorough history, clinical examination and laboratory investigations. They were randomly divided into two groups, Group D (received Inj. Dexmedetomidine) and Group P (received Inj. Placebo). During bolus and infusion Heart Rate (HR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2) was recorded at every five minutes interval for first 20 minute.

Results

The mean age in Group D was 39.5 years and in Group P was 40 years. The sex distribution in two groups was in Group D, 12 patients (40%) were females and 18 (60%) patients were males. While in Group P 10 (33.3%) were females and 20 (66.7%) patients were males. The two groups were comparable with respect to diagnosis and type of surgery of patients and difference was not statistically significant. The mean HR, the mean DBP and the mean MAP was lower in Group D as compared to Group P and the difference was statistically significant.

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine provided intraoperative haemodynamic stability. It attenuates the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy, intubation, at pin fixation and the emergence from anaesthesia.

Keywords

Introduction

The goals of neuroanaesthesia are to ensure stable perioperative cerebral haemodynamics and avoid sudden rise in intracranial pressure to prevent acute brain swelling [1]. The intense surgical stimuli associated with craniotomy frequently cause sympathetic activation which results in marked changes in systemic arterial pressure and Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF). These cerebrovascular responses may result in elevated Intracranial Pressure (ICP) and reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure which can lead to cerebral ischemia, especially in patients with impaired auto regulation and compromised cerebral compliance. Thus, the prevention and control of the haemodynamic response to nociceptive stimuli are of utmost importance to preserve stable cerebral homeostasis which is also important for neurosurgical patients for rapid and smooth recovery from anaesthesia which is often preferred to allow immediate neurological evaluation [1]. The haemodynamic stability may become more challenging in hypertensive patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures.

There are several drugs which have been used to maintain cerebral haemodynamics such as opioids, propofol, α-2 agonists and beta blockers. Opioid analgesic prevents haemodynamic responses intraoperatively but if given in excess may result in respiratory depression with carbon dioxide retention, with subsequent increase in the intracranial pressure during recovery. The α-2 agonists like clonidine blunt hypertensive response to intubation or during pin head-holder application, but may cause hypotension especially in elderly.

There are several concerns which must be addressed when a new drug is introduced into neuroanaesthesia practice. Principal considerations include the ability of a drug to allow a haemodynamically stable perioperative course and preservation of intracranial homeostasis, to be compatible with neurophysiological monitoring and to ensure rapid emergence to a level of consciousness permitting neurological assessment in the operating room. Furthermore, cerebral blood volume reduction, an optimization of the cerebral oxygen supply and demand relationship and neuroprotection add to these considerations [2].

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist recently introduced to anaesthesia practice [3,4]. It produces dose-dependent sedation, anxiolysis and analgesia (involving spinal and supraspinal sites) without respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine has shown analgesic effects without significant respiratory depression. It provides good intraoperative haemodynamic stability with decreased intraoperative opioid requirements and other beneficial effects in terms of neural protection as suggested by animal studies.

This study aimed to assess effect of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative haemodynamic stability and to assess the intraoperative requirements of analgesic and other anaesthetic agents and also to assess postoperative sedation, respiratory depression and any other side effects of dexmedetomidine as compared to placebo.

Materials and Methods

After institutional ethical committee approval, this prospective randomized study was done in 60 patients of either sex, age between 18 to 60 years and ASA Grade I and II undergoing elective craniotomies under GA for intracranial SOL from March 2010 to March 2013.

Inclusion Criteria: All patients with age between 18 to 60 years, Glasgow coma scale 15, patients given consent for study drug administration and surgery and patients with no history of any drug or substance allergy were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria: Patients on anti-hypertensive medication with alpha methyldopa, clonidine or other α-2 adrenergic agonists, patients with preoperative heart rate less than 45 or any heart block, pregnant women, patients with morbid obesity and patients with history of any drug or substance allergy were excluded from the study.

All the 60 patients were evaluated with detail history, general and systemic examination, airway examination and laboratory investigations such as complete blood count, liver function tests, renal function tests, random blood sugar, serum electrolytes, chest radiograph, ECG, HIV, HBsAg, HCV. Then after written informed consent they were randomly divided into two groups by simple random sampling method.

1) Group D received: Inj. Dexmedetomidine (Bolus + infusion).

2) Group P received: Inj. Placebo (Bolus + infusion).

On arrival in the operation theatre patient’s identity and Nil by Mouth (NBM) status, consent was confirmed. Standard intraoperative monitoring of HR, SBP, DBP, MAP and SPO2 was initiated. Baseline preoperative values of these parameters were recorded.

An 18 G intravenous (IV) catheter was inserted for drug and continuous fluid administration. IV infusion of normal saline was started at the rate of 5 to 10 ml/kg/hr. A left radial artery was cannulated for invasive arterial BP under LA taking all aseptic precautions.

In Group D, patients received IV bolus dose of Dexmedetomidine 1 μgm/kg which was diluted to make it of 20 cc volume given over 10 minutes followed by IV infusion of 0.5 μgm/kg/hr through infusion pump till skin closure.

In Group P, patients received bolus dose of IV placebo i.e., normal saline of 20 cc volume over 10 minute followed by IV infusion of normal saline 0.5 ml/kg/hr, through infusion pump till skin closure.

During bolus and infusion HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, SPO2 was recorded at every five minutes interval for first 20 minutes.

After completion of bolus drugs and 10 minutes after initiation of infusion in both the groups, patients were preoxygenated for 5 minutes and simultaneously premedicated through a separate IV line with

1) Inj. Glycopyrrolate 0.004 mg/kg IV

2) Inj. Ondansetron 0.08 mg/kg IV

3) Inj. Fentanyl 2 μgm/kg IV

Induction was done after three minutes of premedication with propofol in incremental doses till the loss of eye lash reflex then neuromuscular block was achieved with Inj. Rocuronium 1mg/kg. Induction dose of propofol recorded. Patients were ventilated for three minute. Laryngoscopy and intubation was performed with adequate size of armored tube and proper size Ryle’s tube was inserted. Throat was packed with wet roller gauge, bite block was inserted, air entry on both sides checked and endotracheal tube was secured properly with adhesive tape.

Anaesthesia was maintained with Nitrous oxide (N2O) and Oxygen (O2) (60%+40%), Isoflurane was initiated to achieve end tidal concentration of 0.5% and end tidal isoflurane concentration was monitored throughout the intraoperative period. For muscle relaxation Inj. Rocuronium was started at the rate of 0.5 mg/kg/hr. The intraoperative depth of anaesthesia and analgesia was adjusted as per haemodynamic status.

Monitoring of HR, SBP, DBP, MAP and SPO2 was done at the following intervals: Preoperative; 5 min after bolus (5 min AB); 10 min after bolus (10 min AB); 5 min after infusion (5 min AI); 10 min after infusion (10 min AI); After premedication (A premed); After induction (AInd); After laryngoscopy (AL); At intubation (AInt); 5 min after intubation; At pin insertion (At PI); Then 15 min interval intraoperative; At extubation; 30 min. interval postoperatively for 4 hours; The incidents of haemodynamic changes which are outside the predetermined window were recorded.

Results

The demographic data with respect to age, weight, duration of surgery and sex and ASA grade were comparable in both groups as shown in [Table/Fig-1,2] respectively.

Comparison of age, weight and duration of surgery in Group D and Group P.

VariablesGroup DGroup PMann-Whitney Test
MeanSD (±)MedianIQRMeanSD (±)MedianIQRz-valuep-valueDifference is-
Age (yrs) ^38.8716.5339.5036.2541.5713.340.0024.25-0.6020.547Not significant
Weight (Kg) ^53.877.5852.011.2556.706.5857.5010.75-1.6060.108Not significant
Duration of surgery (min) ^290.023.0830015.00293.521.46300.015.00-0.0910.927Not significant

^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test.


Comparison of sex and ASA Grade in Group D and Group P.

ParameterGroupTotalChi-square test (p-value)
Group DGroup P
No.%No.%No.%
Sex
Female1240.01033.32236.70.592 (Not significant)
Male1860.02066.73863.3
ASA Grade
I2066.72170.04168.30.781(Not significant)
II1033.3930.01931.7

The median (range) age in Group D was 39.5 (18-60) years and in Group P was 40 (18-60) years. By applying, Mann-Whitney test, (p =0.547): difference in the age was not significant.

The sex distribution in two groups was: in Group D out of 30 patients, 12 (40%) were females and 18 (60%) were males and in Group P out of 30 patients, 10 (33.3%) were females and 20 (66.7%) were males.

As shown in [Table/Fig-1], the median (range) duration of surgery in Group D was 300 minutes (240–315 min) and in Group P was 300 minutes (195-315 min). By applying, Mann-Whitney test, (p= 0.927): difference between duration of surgery was not significant. Thus, the two groups were comparable with respect to duration of surgery. [Table/Fig-2] shows the comparison of sex and ASA Grade between the groups, which was not significant.

The two groups were comparable with respect to diagnosis of patients as shown in [Table/Fig-3] and the difference was not significant by applying Pearson chi-square test (p=0.288).

Comparison of diagnosis in Group D and Group P.

DiagnosisGroupTotalChi-square tests (p-value)
Group DGroup P
No.%No.%No.%
Frontal Sol310.0%310.0%610.0%0.288NotSignificant
Sphenoidal Meningioma516.7%13.3%610.0%
Craniopharyngioma516.7%13.3%610.0%
Parietal Sol13.3%413.3%58.3%
Corpus Callosal Glioma ^00.0%413.3%46.7%
Frontal Glioma ^310.0%00.0%35.0%
Frontoparietal Sol ^26.7%13.3%35.0%
Frontotemporal Sol ^00.0%13.3%11.7%
Insular Glioma ^13.3%00.0%11.7%
Parasagital Meningioma ^13.3%00.0%11.7%
Parietal Meningioma ^13.3%00.0%11.7%
Pituitary Adenoma ^00.0%13.3%11.7%
Suprasellar Cystic Tumour ^00.0%26.7%23.3%
Suprasellar Epidermoid ^00.0%13.3%11.7%
Temporal Glioma ^00.0%413.3%46.7%
Temporal Meningioma ^00.0%13.3%11.7%
Temporal Sol ^310.0%00.0%35.0%
Temporoparietal Glioma ^413.3%00.0%46.7%
Temporoparietal Sol ^00.0%413.3%46.7%
Thalamic Glioma ^00.0%26.7%23.3%
Thalamic Sol ^13.3%00.0%11.7%
Total30100.0%30100.0%60100.0%

^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test


Similarly, [Table/Fig-4] shows that the two groups were comparable with respect to type of surgery of patients and difference was not significant by applying Fishers-Exact test (p=0.137). The various haemodynamic parameters recorded were HR, SBP, DBP and MAP. These parameters were recorded preoperatively and then at five minutes interval during bolus (10 minute period) and first 10 minutes of infusion, after premedication, after induction, after laryngoscopy, at intubation, five minutes after intubation and at pin insertion. After that the parameters were recorded at 15 minutes interval during intraoperative period, at extubation and then at 30 minutes interval postoperatively for four hours.

Comparison of types of surgery in Group D and Group P.

SurgeryGroupTotalChi-square testp-value
Group DGroup P
No.%No.%No.%
Frontoparietal Craniotomy1033.3%1136.7%2135.0%0.137Notsignificant
Temporoparietal Craniotomy620.0%620.0%1220.0%
Frontal Craniotomy ^516.7%26.7%711.7%
Pterional Craniotomy ^13.3%516.7%610.0%
Temporal Craniotomy ^310.0%13.3%46.7%
Bifrontal Craniotomy ^26.7%13.3%35.0%
Subfrontal Craniotomy ^310.0%00.0%35.0%
Parietal Craniotomy ^00.0%26.7%23.3%
Parieto-occipital Craniotomy ^00.0%26.7%23.3%
Total30100.0%30100.0%60100.0%

As shown in [Table/Fig-5], at the time of pin insertion mean HR in Group D and in Group P was 80.00±5.10 bpm and 108.98±3.89 bpm, respectively. The mean HR was lower in Group D as compared to Group P and the difference was statistically significant (p-value=3.07E-31). Thus, the sympathetic response at the time of pin insertion was obtunded by dexmedetomidine as compared to placebo. Thus, the difference between the mean HR in Group D and Group P at various events viz., premedication, induction, laryngoscopy, intubation and pin insertion was statistically significant.

Comparison of HR at various time intervals between Group D and Group P.

Heart Rate (beats/ min)Group DGroup PUnpaired t-test applied
MeanSD (±)MedianIQRMeanSD (±)MedianIQRt-valuep-value
Preop82.478.7480.5010.2583.478.4580.0014.502.1280.078
5 min AB78.237.6278.0010.5082.339.3282.0015.25-1.8660.067
10 min AB73.707.7674.5010.0080.678.6681.0014.25-3.2820.00175*
5 min AI ^69.006.3770.006.2577.309.1177.0014.50-3.3180.00091*
10 min AI^65.306.2766.503.5076.608.4075.5013.50-4.9188.72E-07*
A Premed61.835.9961.005.5071.638.2870.0014.00-5.2542.23E-06*
A Indu ^59.636.8359.006.7570.407.9470.0012.50-5.0324.85E-07*
A Scopy ^79.805.5180.006.00108.973.81109.005.25-6.6692.57E-11*
A Intub80.505.1380.506.25109.103.84110.005.25-24.453.08E-32*
5 minAInt ^67.675.1668.006.0076.036.9675.0010.50-4.5565.22E-06*
At P I80.005.1080.006.25108.983.89111.005.25-5.0333.07E-31*
Then every 15 min
15 min ^81.7015.2377.0028.0092.4723.4980.0047.75-1.7390.08203
30 min ^88.7010.6889.0020.00101.7019.29105.0038.25-2.4150.01574*
45 min ^77.0711.1477.5013.5081.205.8080.0010.25-1.8030.077
60 min68.135.4468.507.0078.274.5378.006.00-7.8401.14E-10*
75 min66.674.8266.508.2577.975.3077.506.25-8.6425.20E-12*
90 min65.335.5466.507.5078.236.2877.507.25-8.4371.14E-11*
105 min65.135.8265.008.2577.605.2376.007.00-8.7243.80E-12*
120 min65.035.9966.006.2577.735.4478.007.75-8.6016.07E-12*
135 min ^64.476.2164.508.7579.705.7680.003.25-6.3452.23E-10*
150 min64.575.4564.006.7580.433.9980.003.00-12.861.22E-18*
165 min ^64.135.7664.005.5080.104.3579.503.00-6.5934.30E-11*
180 min ^64.175.6964.007.2580.134.9380.005.25-6.4101.46E-10*
195 min ^63.874.9164.005.7591.1015.2287.5032.00-6.6143.73E-11*
210 min ^63.905.1464.007.0093.4814.5190.0028.00-6.5914.36E-11*
225 min ^63.806.0564.006.2582.4812.1778.008.00-6.2623.81E-10*
240 min ^63.705.7263.507.2579.903.5080.002.00-6.5804.72E-11*
255 min ^65.384.9665.006.0082.246.8680.008.00-6.3272.50E-10*
270 min ^65.284.5665.007.0080.313.3280.003.50-6.2993.00E-10*
285 min66.334.1867.005.0079.183.0178.503.75-12.851.82E-17*
300 min ^66.274.5065.504.5078.002.2078.002.75-5.5063.66E-08*
315 min ^69.007.5570.0015.0079.752.3679.004.25-2.1410.03231*
At ext^94.934.7598.009.00108.005.56109.009.25-6.5047.84E-11*
Then every 30 min for 4 hrs
30 min ^71.235.2072.006.2577.939.6978.0016.50-2.5490.0108*
60 min ^74.675.4776.008.0085.8312.0085.5024.25-3.4800.0005*
90 min82.278.1280.5012.0084.9010.3185.0018.25-1.0990.276
120 min ^87.376.7690.0011.0089.738.4277.5011.50-3.6650.25
150 min ^80.636.4682.008.7578.806.8376.0011.25-1.1040.27
180 min81.075.7482.008.5079.576.2578.5010.500.9680.337
210 min81.205.4382.006.0080.005.5979.0010.000.8440.402
240 min81.535.1882.506.2580.735.3480.007.250.5890.558

^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test, t-value replaced by Z-value

*- p-value significant (<0.05)


[Table/Fig-6] shows that the mean SBP at the time of pin insertion in Group D and in Group P was 123.10±5.44 mmHg and 140.80±3.53 mmHg respectively. The mean SBP was lower in Group D as compared to Group P and the difference was statistically significant (p-value = 2.79E-08). Thus, the sympathetic response at the time of pin insertion was obtunded by dexmedetomidine as compared to placebo. Thus, difference between the mean SBP in Group D and Group P at various events viz., premedication, induction, laryngoscopy, intubation and pin insertion was statistically significant. After extubation the mean SBP was noted at 30 minute intervals for four hours and it was significantly lower in Group D as compare to Group P throughout the postoperative period.

Comparison of SBP between Group D and Group P.

Systolic BP (mmHg)Group DGroup PUnpaired t-test applied
MeanSD (±)MedianIQRMeanSD (±)MedianIQRt-valuep-value
Preop122.24.61120.57.5122.6310.51206.5-1.1160.264
5 min AB122.2718.421186.25123.639.261207.75-2.2360.025*
10 min AB11516.62110.59122.89.141208.75-4.4061.05E-05*
5 min AI ^104.476.210310121.97.69119.56.25-6.575.02E-11*
10 min AI^100.25.431008.5121.176.05119.56.25-6.6622.71E-11*
A Premed97.635.96977.25118.335.581175-6.5954.26E-11*
A Indu ^93.776.36926.5104.45.441049.25-5.6062.07E-08*
ALaryng ^130.84.11130.56140.233.651404-9.4112.80E-13*
A Intub131.375.071329.5139.53.581403.5-5.4445.22E-08*
5 minAInt ^101.16.1310011110.44.551106.5-6.6771.02E-08*
At P I123.105.44129.0010.50140.803.53138.504.25-5.4342.79E-08*
Then every 15 min
15 min ^116.4720.1212539.25124.221.63109.539.25-2.130.033*
30 min ^123.7713.4512422.5131.822.53138.544.25-1.2210.222
45 min ^108.6313.4810422.25109.274.98108.56-1.1850.236
60 min99.36.2498.55.25107.272.461073.25-5.0674.04E-07*
75 min98.235.5197.55.5107.172.451074-5.1762.27E-07*
90 min96.74.6995.54.25107.473.2107.53.25-5.9692.38E-09*
105 min974.64964.25107.032.661072.5-6.0051.91E-09*
120 min95.54.11945.25107.732.241083.25-6.5177.17E-11*
135 min ^96.334.8594.55108.52.51093.25-6.1776.55E-10*
150 min96.034.68944.25108.72.67108.53-6.3661.94E-10*
165 min ^95.24.33944.25109.032.71092.25-6.3412.29E-10*
180 min ^95.574.07944109.84.071092-6.3352.37E-10*
195 min ^95.674.51944.25121.1715.5611633-6.3522.13E-10*
210 min ^95.94.25945125.0718.1311635-6.4411.19E-10*
225 min ^95.973.69955111.4812.461074-6.5665.17E-11*
240 min ^95.634.21955.25107.721.791083-6.3092.82E-10*
255 min ^96.773.98964.25108.977.181082.5-6.1169.59E-10*
270 min ^96.524.67964.5107.862.151093-5.7668.11E-09*
285 min96.584.04965.5106.211.751072-5.6561.55E-08*
300 min ^98.094.2984.25106.152.111064-7.741.79E-09*
315 min ^984988107.252.061073.75-4.0480.01*
At ext ^1193.481303.5129.673.881293.25-0.8870.03751*
Then every 30 min for 4 hrs
30 min ^109.273.191092121.636.941195-6.4111.45E-10*
60 min ^112.274.191125.25126.46.51128.510.25-6.1955.85E-10*
90 min ^117.477.4411711.25124.676.52123.510.75-3.6430.0003*
120 min125.074.93127.59.251224.9312142.4110.01911*
150 min^118.834.961205.25121.232.371212-2.4040.0162*
180 min^117.774.91196.25122.032.141222.25-4.0036.25E-05*
210 min^117.774.751207.5121.371.75121.52-3.4770.0005*
240 min^119.24.791204.5121.631.961213-2.2730.023*

^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test, t-value replaced by Z-value

*- p-value significant (<0.05)


[Table/Fig-7] shows that after laryngoscopy the mean DBP in Group D and in Group P was 78.23±6.31 mmHg and 87.17±1.97 mmHg respectively. The mean DBP was lower in Group D as compared to Group P and the difference was statistically significant (p=6.21E-10). After extubation the mean DBP was noted at 30 minute intervals for four hours and it was significantly lower in Group D as compare to Group P throughout the postoperative period.

Comparison of DBP at various time intervals between Group D and Group P.

Diastolic BP (mmHg)Group DGroup PUnpaired t-test applied
MeanSD (±)MedianIQRMeanSD (±)MedianIQRt-valuep-value
Preop81.902.1283.004.0083.004.4983.507.25-1.2140.230
5 min AB79.837.4878.502.2583.374.1784.006.25-3.8220.000*
10 min AB75.838.0174.008.0083.203.6583.506.00-5.1003.40E-07*
5 min AI ^69.434.8368.504.2583.073.4583.003.25-6.4401.19E-10*
10 min AI^65.975.3065.507.0082.073.4483.004.00-6.5615.35E-11*
A Premed63.304.4462.004.5079.173.6479.504.50-6.5216.97E-11*
A Indu ^61.533.8861.004.2568.034.2668.004.25-6.1806.87E-08*
ALaryng ^78.236.3180.009.5087.171.9787.002.25-7.4016.21E-10*
A Intub79.235.6180.007.2587.601.9687.002.25-6.1041.04E-09*
5 minAInt ^66.136.3167.008.0072.404.4673.006.75-4.4414.09E-05*
At P I80.205.5980.507.5086.901.9886.502.25-6.1031.03E-09*
Then every 15 min
15 min ^75.2311.5880.0022.2580.1312.8976.0023.75-1.6430.10043
30 min ^80.208.2783.509.0084.5310.1587.5018.00-1.9200.0548
45 min ^69.279.9768.0020.0077.475.6979.0010.00-3.1470.00165*
60 min63.137.0662.009.2577.205.6278.007.25-8.5447.56E-12*
75 min60.305.8060.507.2576.905.3076.507.00-11.5701.06E-16*
90 min59.775.6160.507.0077.575.1178.004.75-12.8451.32E-18*
105 min59.735.0859.006.0077.735.3877.007.25-13.3332.60E-19*
120 min59.174.3159.008.0079.003.6879.505.25-19.1818.67E-27*
135 min ^58.674.5758.008.0080.034.2980.003.25-18.6853.22E-26*
150 min59.435.0359.507.5079.772.3280.002.25-6.6742.49E-11*
165 min ^59.504.9059.507.5080.432.5880.003.00-6.6702.56E-11*
180 min ^59.335.8960.007.5080.703.2180.005.00-6.6522.89E-11*
195 min ^57.334.3758.005.0082.835.8782.5011.00-6.6642.67E-11*
210 min ^58.075.1758.506.5084.105.0287.0010.00-6.6043.99E-11*
225 min ^56.734.9357.007.0080.454.2180.004.50-6.6103.85E-11*
240 min ^57.375.5758.507.0079.902.4080.003.00-6.6133.77E-11*
255 min ^57.504.2358.007.0080.073.1380.002.50-6.3751.83E-10*
270 min ^56.763.9157.006.5079.972.6880.003.00-6.3072.84E-10*
285 min57.634.1858.507.2579.142.4679.003.50-6.1836.31E-10*
300 min ^57.234.0957.506.5078.852.3779.003.00-5.5502.86E-08*
315 min ^59.331.1660.002.0079.750.5080.000.75-2.2230.02622*
At ext ^84.134.0284.005.2588.202.7588.503.25-4.5792.52E-05*
Then every 30 min for 4 hrs
30 min ^71.773.8271.003.2582.803.1283.505.00-12.2471.01E-17*
60 min ^75.035.7376.004.5083.672.4184.002.25-5.9532.64E-09*
90 min ^77.507.7180.003.2584.272.2985.003.00-5.1772.25E-07*
120 min81.872.8982.003.2583.602.5484.004.50-2.4690.017*
150 min^79.205.0880.004.5083.902.6684.505.00-4.5016.76E-06*
180 min^77.206.7580.004.2583.973.0184.506.00-5.0115.42E-07*
210 min^77.107.4880.002.2583.632.7984.005.25-4.8929.98E-07*
240 min^78.508.0380.002.2584.102.4485.004.00-4.7551.99E-06*

^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test, t-value replaced by Z-value

*- p-value significant (<0.05)


[Table/Fig-8] shows that, after five minute of intubation the mean MAP in Group D and in Group P was 77.79±5.61 mmHg and 85.07±3.50 mmHg. The mean MAP was lower in Group D as compared to Group P and the difference was statistically significant (p-value = 7.26E- 07). At extubation although there was rise in mean HR, SBP, DBP and MAP in both groups, the difference between the changes in these parameters at extubation was statistically significant. Thus the pressor response at extubation was also attenuated in Group D. On comparing the changes in mean HR, SBP, DBP and MAP between the two groups at various intervals the haemodynamic stability was observed in Group D.

Comparison of MAP between Group D and Group P.

MAPGroup DGroup PUnpaired t-test applied
MeanSD (±)MedianIQRMeanSD (±)MedianIQRt-valuep-value
Preop ^95.332.6395.834.4296.215.6594.335.42-0.0450.964
5 min AB ^93.9810.0391.833.5096.795.1295.177.33-3.5530.000382*
10 min AB ^88.8910.5786.336.1796.404.7394.677.17-5.0514.41E-07*
5 min AI ^81.114.6080.677.0096.014.0995.674.00-6.6103.84E-11*
10 min AI ^77.384.8876.336.1795.103.4994.834.50-6.6183.64E-11*
A Premed ^74.744.1674.005.3392.223.6991.833.58-6.6542.85E-11*
AInd ^72.284.2371.673.2580.163.8480.175.50-5.7538.76E-09*
AL ^95.764.7396.837.42104.861.74104.672.08-6.4651.02E-10*
AInt ^96.614.5397.506.17104.901.75104.832.08-6.4131.42E-10*
5 min AInt ^77.795.6178.008.2585.073.5084.675.50-4.9547.26E-07*
At P I96.594.5097.506.18105.001.73105.702.07-6.4031.43E-09*
Then every 15 min
15 min ^88.9814.1595.8326.5894.8215.5986.0030.00-1.8850.059414
30 min ^94.729.6396.8314.0100.2913.88104.026.17-1.7600.07834
45 min ^82.3910.6979.1718.088.074.7588.509.83-2.4480.01435*
60 min75.196.0273.837.4287.224.1387.335.50-9.0281.19E-12*
75 min72.944.3872.334.5086.993.8086.835.59-13.283.09E-19*
90 min72.084.4272.336.9287.533.9687.674.92-14.271.22E-20*
105 min ^72.164.2571.176.0887.845.2787.004.17-6.6133.77E-11*
120 min ^71.283.5071.005.4288.582.6988.833.92-6.6552.83E-11*
135 min ^71.223.5871.006.0989.814.3889.672.50-6.6562.81E-11*
150 min ^71.634.3971.676.4289.412.1189.002.08-6.6572.80E-11*
165 min ^71.404.0271.675.6689.972.0789.672.50-6.6582.77E-11*
180 min ^71.414.4571.335.8490.402.4689.834.00-6.6552.82E-11*
195 min ^70.113.6169.675.7595.618.6793.0017.83-6.6552.83E-11*
210 min ^70.684.1870.506.0897.769.1194.6718.33-6.5984.17E-11*
225 min ^69.813.7470.004.6790.796.6988.672.66-6.5984.18E-11*
240 min ^70.124.5470.676.4289.171.8489.002.50-6.5994.14E-11*
255 min ^70.593.5271.004.5889.704.0488.672.17-6.3592.03E-10*
270 min ^70.013.2669.335.3389.262.1589.002.17-6.2923.14E-10*
285 min ^70.613.6171.005.5888.172.0688.003.00-6.1726.75E-10*
300 min ^70.853.5070.334.4287.952.1988.673.58-5.5422.99E-08*
315 min72.221.5471.332.6788.920.9689.001.75-17.8581.01E-05*
A ext ^99.423.33995.33102.022.59101.674.08-2.9520.00316*
Then every 30 min for 4 hrs
30 min ^84.272.9183.673.4195.743.7195.333.84-6.5894.43E-11*
60 min ^87.444.1887.832.9197.913.2999.174.91-6.4181.38E-10*
90 min ^90.826.4891.337.597.733.0297.174.08-4.8211.43E-06*
120 min ^96.273.1596.675.4296.42.6795.832.84-0.4510.651659
150 min ^92.414.5993.334.1796.341.9996.332.5-4.2841.84E-05*
180 min ^90.725.46934.1796.662.297.333.17-5.3429.21E-08*
210 min ^90.665.8393.173.3396.211.8796.332.83-5.3359.57E-08*
240 min ^92.076.5293.331.8396.611.88972.67-4.5674.96E-06*

^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test, t-value replaced by Z-value

*- p-value significant (<0.05)


Discussion

Perioperative haemodynamic stability is one of the most important concepts of neuroanaesthesia [1]. During surgery, low arterial pressure predisposes patient to cerebral ischaemia, as auto regulation of the cerebral blood flow is often impaired near tumours and traumatized areas. On the other hand, abrupt rise in arterial pressure may cause cerebral oedema or bleeding in the operating field [3,4]. Haemodynamic stability is also, important for rapid and smooth recovery which is preferred for immediate neurological evaluation [2]. Talke P et al., studied, the haemodynamic and adrenergic effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine infusion after vascular surgery [5]. They found that during emergence from anaesthesia, heart rate was slower with dexmedetomidine (73±11 bpm) than placebo (83±20 bpm) (p=0.006) and the percentage of time the heart rate was within the predetermined haemodynamic limits was more frequent with dexmedetomidine (p<0.05). So, they conclude that dexmedetomidine attenuates increases in heart rate during emergence from anaesthesia. In the present study at the time of extubation the mean HR in Group D and in Group P was 94.93±4.75 bpm and 108±5.56 bpm, respectively. The HR in Group D was significantly lower as compared to Group P (p-value = 7.8E-11). Thus, observation in present study was in concurrence with above study. Tanskanen PE et al., studied 54 patients undergoing intracranial tumour surgery randomized to receive in a double-blind manner a continuous dexmedetomidine infusion (plasma target concentration 0.2 or 0.4 ng/ml) or placebo, beginning 20 minutes before anaesthesia and continuing until the start of skin closure [1]. They found that, the median percentage of time points when systolic blood pressure was within more or less than 20% of the intraoperative mean was 72, 77 and 85 in placebo, DEX-0.2 and DEX-0.4 groups, respectively (p<0.01), DEX-0.4 groups differed significantly from the other groups. Tachycardiac response to intubation is blunted with DEX (p< 0.01) as well as the hypertensive response to extubation (p< 0.01). The heart rate variability in DEX-0.4 group from placebo (93 vs. 82%, p<0.01) was statistically significant. So, they concluded, dexmedetomidine increased perioperative haemodynamic stability in patients undergoing brain tumour surgery. In the present study unlike above study dexmedetomidine blunted both tachycardia and hypertensive response to intubation and extubation as compared to placebo.

Bakhamees HS et al., studied 80 morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass who were randomly assigned to one of two study groups [6]; Group D (40 patients) received dexmedetomidine (0.8 μg/kg bolus, then as infusion 0.4 μg/kg/hr) and Group P (40 patients) received normal saline (placebo) in the same volume and rate. dexmedetomidine showed significant decrease of intraoperative and postoperative mean blood pressure, heart rate. They concluded that, dexmedetomidine offers better control of intraoperative and postoperative haemodynamics. As in above study, in the present study there was significant decrease in MAP and HR in Dexmedetomidine group as compared to placebo. dexmedetomidine also offered better control of intraoperative and postoperative haemodynamics. Thus, results of present study are in concurrence with this study.

Bekker A et al., studied the effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative haemodynamics in patients undergoing craniotomy [3]. In this study, 72 patients scheduled for elective craniotomy were randomly assigned to receive either sevoflurane-opioid or sevoflurane-opioid-dexmedetomidine anaesthesia. They concluded that intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion was effective for blunting the increases in SBP perioperatively. In the present study dexmedetomidine obtunded the rise in SBP at the time of intubation, laryngoscopy, pin insertion and extubation as compared to placebo. Thus the observations in present study were in concurrence with above study.

Keniya VM et al., studied 60 patients scheduled for elective surgery of more than three hours into two groups [7]; one is the control group which received isoflurane-opioid and the other is study group which received isoflurane-opioid-dexmedetomidine anaesthesia. After tracheal intubation, maximal average increase was 8% in systolic and 11% in diastolic blood pressure in dexmedetomidine group, as compared to 40% and 25%, respectively, in the control group. Also, the average increase in heart rate was 7% and 21% in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively. Hence they concluded that dexmedetomidine is effective in attenuating sympathoadrenal response to tracheal intubation. In the present study at the time of intubation the HR, SBP, DBP was significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group as compared to placebo. Thus, dexmedetomidine obtunded the haemodynamic response to intubation. Thus, observations in present study were in concurrence with above study.

Our study is limited by small sample size and lack of comparative data in humans.

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine provided intraoperative haemodynamic stability. It attenuated the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy, intubation, at pin fixation and the emergence from anaesthesia. It has significant opioid and anaesthetic sparing effect. There was significantly faster recovery after extubation with dexmedetomidine. There were fewer incidences of hypotension and bradycardia observed with dexmedetomidine.

^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test.^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test, t-value replaced by Z-value*- p-value significant (<0.05)^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test, t-value replaced by Z-value*- p-value significant (<0.05)^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test, t-value replaced by Z-value*- p-value significant (<0.05)^ Mann-Whitney test applied as data failed ‘Normality’ test, t-value replaced by Z-value*- p-value significant (<0.05)

References

[1]Tanskanen PE, Kyttä JV, Randell TT, Aantaa RE, Dexmedetomidine as an anaesthetic adjuvant in patients undergoing intracranial tumour surgery: A double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study British Journal of Anaesthesiology 2006 97(5):658-65.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Bekker A, Sturaitis MK, Dexmedetomidine for neurological surgery Operative Neurosurgery 2005 57(1):1-10.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Bekker A, Sturaitis M, Bloom M, Moric M, Parker E, Babu R, The effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative haemodynamics in patients undergoing craniotomy Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2008 107(4):1340-47.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL, Miller’s Anaesthesia 2009 volume 17th editionChurchill LivingstoneElsevier:751-56.Chapter 26 Intravenous Anaesthetics  [Google Scholar]

[5]Talke P, Chen R, Thomas B, Aggarwall A, Gottlieb A, Thorborg P, The haemodynamic and adrenergic effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine infusion after vascular surgery Anaesth Analg 2000 90(4):834-39.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Bakhamees HS, El-Halafawy YM, El-Kerdawy HM, Gouda NM, Altemyatt S, Effects of dexmedetomidine in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass Middle East Journal of Anaesthesiology 2007 19(3):537-51.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Keniya VM, Ladi S, Naphade R, Dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathoadrenal response to tracheal intubation and reduces perioperative anaesthetic requirement Indian Journal of Anaesthesiology 2011 55(4):352-57.  [Google Scholar]