JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Internal Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/22720.8940
Year : 2016 | Month : Nov | Volume : 10 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : OC22 - OC28

Yoga Practice for Reducing the Male Obesity and Weight Related Psychological Difficulties-A Randomized Controlled Trial

P.B. Rshikesan1, Pailoor Subramanya2, Ram Nidhi3

1 Research Scholar, Division of Yoga and Life Sciences, Swami Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
2 Associate Professor, Division of Yoga and Life Sciences, Swami Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Division of Yoga and Life Sciences, Swami Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Mr. P.B. Rshikesan, PhD (Yoga) Scholar, SVYASA Yoga University, 19, Eknath Bhavan, Gavipuram Circle, K.G. Nagar, Bengaluru-560 019, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: hrishipb@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Obesity is a health disorder and increasing all over the world. It is also a cause for many non-communicable diseases. Yoga practice reduces the stress level which may improve the eating habits and help in weight reduction.

Aim

To assess the final outcome of the effects after 3 months of the 14 weeks yoga training on obesity of adult male in an urban setting.

Materials and Methods

This was a randomized controlled trial with parallel groups (Yoga and Control groups) on male obese. Total 80 subjects with Body Mass Index (BMI) between 25 to 35 kg/cm2 were enrolled and randomized into two equal groups in which 72 subjects (yoga n = 37 and control n=35) completed the trial. Yoga group mean age ± SD was 40.03±8.74 and Control group mean age±SD was 42.20±12.06. A 14 weeks special IAYT (Integrated Approach of Yoga Therapy) yoga training was given to the Yoga group and no specific activity was given to Control group. The interim results of this study at 14 weeks were covered in another article which is under process. After the 14 weeks of yoga training the Yoga group was asked to continue the yoga practice for the next 3 months and the Control group was not given any physical activity. The final outcome is covered in this paper.

The assessments were anthropometric parameters of body weight (Wt), BMI (Body Mass Index), MAC (Mid-upper Arm Circumferences of left and right arm), WC (Waist Circumference), HC (Hip Circumference), WHR (Waist Hip Ratio), SKF (Skin Fold Thickness) of biceps, triceps, sub scapular, suprailiac and cumulative skin fold thickness value), Percentage body fat based on SKF and Psychological questionnaires of PSS (Perceived Stress Scale) and AAQW (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight related difficulty). Assessments were taken after 3 months of yoga training, for both Yoga and Control groups. Within group, between group and correlation analyses were carried out using SPSS 21.

Results

Improvement in anthropometric and psychological parameters such as Wt, Percentage body fat, PSS were observed in the final outcome. Also, some of the improvements such as AAQW score were lost in the final outcome, compared to interim results.

Conclusion

The yoga practice is effective for obesity control for adult male in an urban setting.

Keywords

Introduction

Obesity is a condition of excessive fat accumulation and is a major risk factor for a number of chronic diseases. It is a health disorder and is growing in high income countries, as well as in low and middle income countries [13]. This health problem is increasing in cities like Mumbai in India and the causes are urbanization and life style changes, among other factors [46]. The previous studies showed that among the Asian Indians, the prevalence of obesity is high in male populations [7,8].

BMI (Body Mass Index) is considered as a measure of obesity. It was observed that for Asian Indians, BMI cut-off points are to be considered much lesser than the WHO standards for categorizing the obesity [912]. In our study, subjects with BMI of 25kg/m2 or above were considered as obese.

In general, obesity is caused by an unbalance in the energy intake and energy expenditure [13]. The causes of obesity are not fully understood but it is a multi factorial disorder. The present options for controlling obesity are inadequate and have adverse effects [1417]. Yoga is an ancient therapeutic practice based on Patanjali yoga sutras [1820]. The Integrated Approach of Yoga Therapy (IAYT) consists of yogic practices based on ancient yoga texts and addresses the mind and body in a holistic way. The earlier studies showed that Yoga practice is useful for stress reduction, awareness on satiety, awareness on over eating and weight reduction [21]. The long term effect of yoga after imparting the training is required to be assessed. The aim of this study was to assess the final outcome after 3 months, of obesity parameters, after giving 14 weeks of IAYT training, for adult male, in an urban setting.

Materials and Methods

Participants

The study was a parallel group study with Yoga and Control groups. After training 14 weeks the Yoga group continued practice of yoga, for the next 3 months. The Control group was not given any specific physical activity.

The participants were from north east part of Mumbai. Advertisement was done and total 80 subjects were enrolled based on inclusion criteria. After randomization with minimization of co-factors, 40 subjects were assigned in each group. The IAYT training was given to Yoga group for 14 weeks and assessments outcome were reported in an earlier paper [22]. Further the study was continued and the final results were taken and the outcome is presented in this paper.

The trial profile is shown in [Table/Fig-1]. Open source software, titled MinmPy, was used for randomization with minimization of co factors [23]. In the inclusion criteria, BMI was from 23 to 35 kg/m2, and age was from 18 to 60 years. All the participants were male. The subjects who had any surgery during previous six months were excluded. Each participant was given an alpha numeric code to remove all personal identities.

Trial profile.

Sample Size

The minimum sample size was determined based on a previous study [24]. In the previous study, out of the 4 primary outcome variables, HC (Hip Circumference) had the lowest effect size and it was considered for calculating the minimum sample size [24]. An open source software, G*Power 3.1 was used and the minimum sample size was determined as 29 [25].

Intervention

The IAYT yoga training consisted of Lecture, Loosening Exercises, Suryanamaskara, Asana, Pranayama and Meditation. All practices were introduced in a slow and progressive manner. Yoga training was for 90 minutes, for five days in a week. After the 14 weeks training Yoga group continued their practice at their home. Regular e-mail, once in a week, was sent to them as a reminder to do yoga practice and requested them to maintain the food log as done during the yoga training. During the final assessment of anthropometric and psychological parameters, after 3 months, all subjects self reported that they were performing yoga practice. The control group was not given any specific physical exercise but they were asked to continue their regular physical activities. The details of the yoga intervention are shown in [Table/Fig-2]. The intervention was during March to September 2015.

Five part yoga training details.

Sr. No.Yoga practiceDuration in Minutes
1Lecture & Counselling10
2aLoosening Exercises10
2bSuryanamaskara10
3Asana30
4Pranayama15
5Meditation15
Total duration90

Components Across both the Groups

All participants were given their respective measurement records (Pre and Interim at 14 weeks) and the sample meal plan applicable for sedentary male adults, based on guidelines of National Institute of Nutrition Hyderabad [26].

Assessments

The Wt (Body Weight), BMI, WC (Waist Circumference), HC (Hip Circumference), WHR (Waist hip Ratio), A Body Shape Index (ABSI), Skinfold thickness (SKF) at 4 body points applicable for men and Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MAC) of left and right arms were taken. ABSI was calculated based on WC height and BMI [2729].

The scores of Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight Related Difficulty (AAQW) were taken [3032]. PSS is a validated scale for perceived stress. The AAQW is a validated scale which assesses the experience based avoidance and psychological inflexibility associated with food habits and obesity [32].

For assessing the SKF, skinfold thickness caliper was used [33,34]. The assessments were done at four locations applicable for male [35,36]. The table applicable for men was used for calculating Percentage Body Fat (PFC), based on the cumulative value of skin fold thicknesses [35]. The four measures of SKF were at biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac sites. Each SKF was calculated from the average of three readings. The cumulative SKF was found from sum of the four SKFs. The Wt was measured in electronic weighing scale and circumferences were measured using non elastic tape.

Ethical Clearance

The Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) clearance was taken.

Informed consent

The informed consent from participants was obtained before recruitment.

Trial Registration

Registered at Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2015/01/005433.

Statistical Analysis

Analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 21.0 The normality test was done by Shapiro wilk test. The Paired sample t-test was done for all the parameters, for the first and final values, of both groups, which were found normally distributed. For not normally distributed parameters, the Wilcoxon signed ranks test was done. The Between group analysis was done by independent sample t-test. To find the relative improvement, from Pre to Final values, among the variables, the differences of Pre to Final values were correlated, among each other. A two sided, value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The base line demographic data of age, height and BMI of the groups are given in [Table/Fig-3]. The outcome of within group analysis of anthropometric parameters, for the Yoga and Control groups are given in [Table/Fig-4,5] respectively. The between group analysis at 6 months, is given in [Table/Fig-6]. The relative improvements (from Pre to Final) among the variables are given in [Table/Fig-7]. The comparative data of Pre, Interim and Final are given in [Table/Fig-8].

Shapiro wilk test was applied for normality.

VariableYoga GroupControl Group
Pre95% CPre95% C
Age40.03±8.74(37.12-42.94)42.20±12.06(38.76-46.89)
Height169.45±7.35(167.00-171.90)169.29±6.37(167.17-171.65)
MinMaxMinMax
BMI25.3334.8425.0133.64

BMI- Body Mass Index

Pre: Before intervention


Within group analysis of normally distributed variables.

VariablePre Mean ± Std Dev.Final Mean ± Std Dev.t valueSigMeans 95% CLowerUpper
Yoga group
WT82.63±10.0580.47±9.592.860.0072.160.633.68
MACL29.98±2.0228.21±1.598.340.0011.771.342.20
MACR30.18±2.0428.24±2.075.140.0011.941.172.71
HC103.50±5.7199.46±4.766.150.0014.042.715.37
RAB19.05±7.0115.26.±2.903.540.0013.801.625.97
STOF32.45±7.8226.47±6.693.520.0015.982.539.42
SHOB27.87±6.9723.10±5.613.270.0024.771.817.73
BMI28.7±2.3527.97±2.212.770.0090.730.201.26
SKFT93.93±22.5676.45±11.744.370.00117.489.3625.60
PSS16.51±6.1212.16±6.903.930.0014.352.116.60
AAQW81.24±17.3574.76±16.162.460.0196.491.1511.82
Control group
WT79.45±8.8578.82±9.161.520.1390.63-0.221.48
MACL32.53±16.5328.30±1.861.520.1374.23-1.429.89
MACR32.47±16.7328.39±2.041.460.1544.09-1.609.77
HC104.28±6.60100.50±5.795.780.0013.782.455.10
RAB13.70±6.5714.77±3.66-0.940.354-1.07-3.371.24
STOF27.46±9.3724.81±6.101.800.0812.65-0.355.65
SHOB21.76±7.1122.2±6.42-0.300.765-0.43-3.362.49
BMI27.70±2.0527.28±2.551.660.1060.42-0.090.93
SKFT73.65±20.6172.12±13.880.460.6511.53-5.278.33
PSS14.29±6.5113.06±6.311.420.1651.23-0.532.99
AAQW73.11±14.8066.63±14.202.830.0085.491.559.42

Paired sample t test was done for all the above Table/Fig 4

WT: weight

MACL: Mid upper arm circumference of left hand

MACR: Mid arm circumference of right hand

HC: Hip circumference

RAB: Triceps skin fold thickness

STOF: Suprailiac skin fold thickness

SHOB: Sub scapular skin fold thickness

BMI: Body mass index

SKFT: Cumulative skin fold thickness

PSS: Perceived stress scale score

AAQW: Action and weight relayed difficulty score


Within group analysis of not normally distributed variables.

VariableYoga groupZ scoreSig asymp.sig (2- tailed)
Pre Mean ± Std Dev.Final Mean ± Std Dev.t valueSig
WC99.58±7.3797.12-102.0495.09±6.7692.84-97.34-4.79b0.001
RAF14.55±7.1912.16-16.9511.62±3.1410.58-12.67-2.29b0.020
WHR0.96±0.040.95-0.980.96±0.040.94-0.97-1.41b0.158
PFC30.78±4.3729.32-32.2428.16±3.4527.01-29.31-3.75b0.001
VariableControl groupZ scoreSig asymp.sig (2- tailed)
Pre Mean ± Std Dev.Final Mean ± Std Dev.t valueSig
WC99.28±6.8296.94-101.6396.29±7.2093.81-98.76-3.12b0.002
RAF10.72±5.009.01-12.4310.34±3.069.29-11.39-0.57b0.572
WHR0.95±0.060.93-0.970.96±0.050.94-0.97-0.02b0.987
PFC27.55±5.1725.77-29.3327.64±4.6526.05-29.24-0.19c0.852

Wilcoxon signed ranks test was done for Not Normally distributed variables

b- based on positive ranks

c- based on negative ranks

WC: Waist circumference

RAF: Biceps skin fold thickness

WHR: Waist hip ratio

PFC Percentage fat(based on skin fold thickness)


Between group analysis.

VariableYoga - Final- Mean Std dev n=37Control -Final- Mean Std dev n=35tSig (2- tailed)Diff. in Mean 95% CI lower/Upper
WT80.47± 9.5978.82± 9.160.750.461.65 (-2.76 - 6.07)
MACL28.21±1.5928.30±1.86-0.220.83-0.09 (-0.90 – 0.72)
MACR28.24±2.0728.39±2.04-0.310.76-0.15 (-1.11 – 0.82)
HC99.46±4.76100.50±5.79-0.830.41-1.04 (-3.53 – 1.45)
RAB15.26±2.9014.77±3.66—0.630.530.49 (-1.06 – 2.04)
STOF26.47±6.6924.81±6.101.100.281.66 (-1.35 – 4.67)
SHOB23.10±5.6122.20±6.420.640.530.90 (-1.93 – 3.73)
BMI27.97±2.2127.28±2.551.220.230.68 (-0.43 – 1.80)
SKFT76.45±11.7472.12±13.881.430.164.33 (-1.70 – 10.36)
PSS12.16±6.9013.06±6.31-0.570.57-0.89 (-4.01 – 2.22)
AAQW74.76±16.1667.63±14.201.980.067.13 (-0.04 – 14.30)

An independent sample t test was applied between yoga & control groups

WT: weight

MACL: Mid upper arm circumference of left hand

MACR: Mid upper arm circumference of right hand

HC: Hip circumference

RAB: Triceps skin fold thickness

SHOB: Subscapular skin fold thickness

STOF: Suprailiac skin fold thickness

BMI: body mass index

SKFT Cumulative skin fold thickness

PSS: Perceived stress scale score

AAQW: Action and weight relayed difficulty score


Correlation analysis on improvement from pre to final readings, among variables.

Difference of final –pre valuesWTMACLMACRWCHCRAFRABSTOFSHOBBMIWHRSKFTPFCPSSAAQW
WT1.00
MACL-0.011.00
MACR0.010.991**1.00
WC0.700**0.070.071.00
HC0.594**0.000.030.656**1.00
RAF0.202*-0.09-0.070.229*0.131.00
RAB0.361**-0.08-0.050.271*0.110.624**1.00
STOF0.458**0.010.000.503**0.234*0.350**0.326**1.00
SHOB0.297**-0.09-0.060.282**0.241*0.328**0.335**0.420**1.00
BMI0.854**-0.020.010.509**0.470**0.205*0.358**0.435**0.272*1.00
WHR0.318**0.100.060.670**-0.120.160.234*0.427**0.140.191.00
SKFT0.462**-0.08-0.050.455**0.257*0.716**0.723**0.761**0.742**0.443**0.339**1.00
PFC0.449**-0.06-0.040.457**0.249*0.659**0.693**0.728**0.745**0.445**0.354**0.963**1.00
PSS0.14-0.291**-0.300**0.07-0.04-0.02-0.030.070.040.100.140.030.021.00
AAQW0.290**0.01-0.010.295**0.02-0.020.070.190.010.348**0.358**0.100.120.260*1.00

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).

Bivariate -Pearson correlation test applied

WT: weight

MACL: Mid arm circumference left

MACR: Mid arm circumference right

HC: Hip circumference

WC: Waist circumference

RAF:Biceps skin fold thickness

RAB: Triceps skin fold thickness

SHOB: Sub scapular skin fold thickness

STOF: Suprailiac skin fold thickness

BMI: body mass index

WHR: Waist hip ratio

PFC: Percentage fat

SKFT: Cumulative skin fold thickness

PSS: Perceived stress scale score

AAQW: Action and weight relayed difficulty score


Pre- Interim- Final Results

Sr. NoGroupParameterPreInterimFinalSig Pre InterimSig Pre Final
1YogaWT82.63±10.0581.51±10.0080.47±9.590.0040.007
Control79.45±8.8579.22±8.9378.82±9.160.3530.139
2YogaMACL29.98±2.0229.42±1.9228.21±1.590.016<0.001
Control32.53±16.5328.10±1.7028.30±1.860.1180.137
3YogaMacr30.18±2.0429.64±2.0428.24±2.070.018<0.001
Control32.47±16.7328.10±1.8528.39±2.040.1250.154
4YogaHC103.50±5.71101.29±4.9599.46±4.76<0.001<0.001
Control104.28±6.60101.38±6.13100.50±5.79<0.001<0.001
5YogaWC99.58±7.3798.25±7.1295.09±6.760.039 (z score -2.06b)<0.001 (z score -4.79b)
Control99.28±6.8295.79±8.3396.29±7.20<0.001 (z score -3.71b)0.002 (z score -3.12b)
6YogaWHR0.96±0.040.97±0.050.96±0.040.069 (z score -1.82c)0.158 (z score -1.41b)
Control0.95±0.060.94±0.060.96±0.050.413 (z score -0.82b)0.987 (z score -0.02b)
7YogaPFC30.78±4.3729.66±3.3028.16±3.450.051 (z score -1.96b)<0.001 (z score -3.75b)
Control27.55±5.1727.58±5.2927.64±4.650.98 (z score -0.03c)0.852 (z score -0.19c)
8YogaBMI28.7±2.3528.33±2.4227.97±2.210.0080.009
Control27.70±2.0527.61±2.0127.28±2.550.3060.106
9YogaSKFT93.93±22.5685.52±13.3876.45±11.740.032<0.001
Control73.65±20.6172.17±14.5572.12±13.880.6930.651
10YogaBiceps-skfraf14.55±7.1912.70±5.0211.62±3.140.156 (z score -1.42b)0.02 (z score -2.29b)
Control10.72±5.0011.10±3.6910.34±3.060.502 (z score -0.672c)0.572 (z score -0.57b)
11YogaTriceps-skfrab19.05±7.0117.87±5.0515.26.±2.900.3790.001
Control13.70±6.5713.22±4.2414.77±3.660.6520.354
12Yogasuprailiac-skfstof32.45±7.8228.04±5.4526.47±6.690.0020.001
Control27.46±9.3725.57±7.0624.81±6.100.2590.081
13YogaSubscapular-skfshob27.87±6.9726.91±5.2323.10±5.610.3960.002
Control21.76±7.1122.28±4.9822.20±6.420.7070.765
14YogaPSS16.51±6.1212.59±6.6512.16±6.90<0.001<0.001
Control14.29±6.5113.51±5.9513.06±6.310.4930.165
15YogaAAQW81.24±17.3571.54±14.6274.76±16.16<0.0010.019
Control73.11±14.8069.71±16.2866.63±14.200.2240.008

Paired sample t test was applied for all Normally distributed variables and Wilcoxon signed ranks test was applied for Not Normally distributed variables

b- based on positive ranks, c- based on negative ranks

WT: weight

MACL: Mid arm circumference left

MACR: Mid arm circumference right

HC: Hip circumference

WC: Waist circumference

WHR: Waist hip ratio

PFC: Percentage body fat

BMI: body mass index

SKFT: Cumulative skin fold thickness

SKFRAF: Biceps skin fold thickness

SKFRAB: Triceps skin fold thickness

SKFSHOB: Sub scapular skin fold thickness

SKFSTOF: Suprailiac skin fold thickness

PSS: Perceived stress scale score

AAQW: Action and weight relayed difficulty score


In each group, 50% of the total subjects was having educational qualification between 10th standard to graduates and 50% was post graduates or above. Also in each group 50% was in age group of 18 to 40 and 50% was in age group of 41 to 60 years. In each of the groups, all the subjects were working and all were having BMI above 25 Kg/m2. The minimum age in Yoga group was 26 and maximum was 60 whereas in Control group, minimum was 21 and maximum 58. Thus minimization of co factors was done [23,37,38]. None of the subjects reported any adverse events due to the intervention.

The combined Pre, Interim and Final results given in [Table/Fig-8], shows that some of the gain in the interim values was lost during the final results.

Anthropometric Parameters

All parameters except WC, WHR, PFC and SKF of biceps were normally distributed.

There was consistent improvement from Pre to Interim to Final result, in the parameters of Wt, HC, BMI, Cumulative skin fold thickness (SKFT), SKF of biceps (SKFraf) and SKF of suprailiac (SKFstof) for both the groups. The Skfstof was improved from Pre to Interim (p<0.002) & Interim to Final (p<0.001) in the Yoga group. In the Yoga group the improvement in SKFT, in Pre to Final was more significant (p<0.001) than in Pre to Interim (p<0.05). In Yoga group alone, MACL and MACR were improved consistently from Pre Interim to Final (p<0.001 for both MACL and MACR for pre-final). Control group did not improve in these parameters in the final result. The WC (p<0.001), WHR, and PFC (p<0.001) were improved from Pre to Interim and to Final in Yoga group but in Control group the gain was lost in the final result. The PFC of Control group was increased in the Final (increase was not significant).

The SKF of triceps (SKFrab), in Control group reduced in Interim but increased in Final. In the Control group, the SKF of sub scapular (SKFshob) increased in Interim and remained almost same in the Final.

The Final results, with respect to the Pre values were as below:

The Wt in the Yoga and Control groups were decreased during the 6 months. The Wt reduction in Yoga group alone was significant (p<0.007). The upper mid arm circumference of right arm (MACR) and upper mid arm circumference of left arm (MACL) were reduced in both the groups but change in Yoga group alone was significant (p<0.001). The WC was reduced in both the groups (yoga p< 0.001 and control p<0.002). WHR remained same in yoga, increased in control but not significant. In Yoga, the PFC, based on chart, was decreased and was significant (p<0.001) [35]. In the Control group it was increased but was not significant. HC was reduced and was significant in both the groups (p<0.001). The cumulative skin fold thickness was reduced in both the groups but was significant (p<0.001) in Yoga group alone. The SKFrab (p<0.001) SKFshob (p<0.002) and SKFstof (p<0.001) and SKFraf (p <0.02) were reduced in Yoga group. In control group SKFstof and SKFraf reduced but were not significant. SKFrab and SKFshob were increased but changes were not significant. The BMI was reduced in both the groups with significance (p< 0.009) in Yoga group alone. The cumulative Skin Fold Thickness (SKFT) reduction was significant (p<0.001) in the Yoga group alone.

Psychological Parameters

The PSS was improved consistently from Pre Interim to Final in the Yoga group alone (p< 0.001). The AAQW was improved in Control group in the Pre-Interim (but not significant) and improved during Pre to Final (p<0.05).

In Yoga group, AAQW was improved during the Pre-Interim but was increased (worsened) in Final (p<0.001 for Pre-Interim, p< 0.05 for Pre-Final).

Compared to Pre values, the improvement in PSS was significant in the Yoga group (p<0.001) alone. In both the groups (compared to Pre values) the AAQW improvement was significant (Yoga p<0.02 and Control p<0.01).

Correlations

The correlations results with respect to, Pre to Final were as below:

BMI was positively correlated to WC (r=0.509, p<0.01), SKFT (r=0.443, p<0.01), HC (r=0.47, p<0.01) and AAQW (r=0.348, p<0.01). The PSS was not much correlated to BMI. The PSS was negatively correlated to MACL (r=-0.291, p<0.01) and MACR (r=-0.300, p<0.01).

Discussion

There was improvement in anthropometric parameters and this was supportive of the earlier studies [39]. In the Yoga group, PFC decrease (improvement) was significant (p<0.001) considering the Pre Final values, though decrease of PFC was not significant during Pre to Interim. This shows that the 14 weeks IAYT training had effect in the Final values. The weight reduction was more significant in Pre to Final than in Pre to Interim, and the weight reduction was consistent. This indicates that the reduction of weight was due to fat reduction. The earlier study of 8 week yoga on boys, showed a significant decrease in percentage body fat [39].

Earlier short term study on 2 weeks yoga and walking with diet control (residential study), showed significant improvements in anthropometric parameters, with no change in WHR [40]. Another study showed similar results on WHR [41]. In our non residential study, and without diet control (though sample food plan information were given to both the groups), the WHR was increased in Interim (compared to pre) and decreased in Final (with respect to interim value-but compared to Pre value the Final value remained same) in the Yoga group. The WHR was decreased in Interim and increased in Final, in the Control group. But WC and HC were consistently reduced in Yoga group, in Pre to Interim and Pre to Final. WC was increased from Interim to Final in the Control group. This shows that in the Yoga group, the fat stored centrally and at peripherally was reduced in a similar way. Similar trend was noted in a short duration trial on obese adults [40]. In the Control group the WHR improvement (decrease) may be due to less fat reduction in peripheral area than in abdominal area in the Interim value. The decrease of WHR of Yoga group, in the Final may be due to more decrease of WC than HC. This could be due to yoga practices of the abdomen area.

The MAC was measured as part of anthropometric measurement in the earlier studies also [41]. But we assessed both the right and left MAC. In our study MAC reduction was significant for Yoga group alone (p<0.001) both during Pre Interim and Pre Final, which shows some reduction of fat or skin muscle in the upper limb similar to the earlier short duration studies [40].

The SKFT was significant in the Yoga alone (p<0.05 in Pre Interim and p<0.001 in Pre Final). This supports that there is reduction in MAC skin fold muscle or fat in the upper arms due to yoga practice which included the Suryanamaskara and Asana requiring active movement of upper arms, for one third of the yoga duration. The consistent reduction of fat/muscle in upper arms in Final value also shows the effectiveness of IAYT for obesity control.

This also shows that in long term yoga practice can give more balanced reduction at different parts of the body like upper arm and waist, compared to the Control group. In the Control group, reduction in waist area was lesser and also there was lesser reduction in upper arms. This may be due to their varied regular physical activities. In our study, Yoga group SKFT and PFC reduced consistently from Pre Interim to Final unlike in the Control group and the anthropometry and skin fold thickness give the best predictors for obesity assessment [42].

In Yoga group SKFraf, SKFrab, SKFshob and SKFstof were also consistently reduced from Pre Interim to Final value. In the Control group SKFraf, SKFshob and SKFstof reduced but SKFrab got increased from Interim to the Final. This may be due to lesser physical activities using hand and shoulder. The reduction in weight in the Yoga group was in all parts. The Control group, doing their regular physical activities like walking etc. did not get weight reduction in all parts.

In AAQW and PSS scores, there was difference in Pre values in the groups [30,32]. Earlier studies showed Psycho Immunological effects of yoga and reduction of various stress levels [4345].

Previous study showed that the decrease in weight related experiential avoidance is linked to more weight loss in a male female combined batch [46]. But in the Yoga group the AAQW score increased from Interim to final and in the Control group it was decreased in the Final. The significance of reduction in AAWQ was lost in Yoga group. This may be due to lesser yoga practices of meditation such as MSRT (Mind sound resonance technique) which are having a group effect and was part of the yoga training of 14 weeks. During Interim to Final, the subjects were doing yoga alone at their home in unsupervised situations. In control group AAQW score reduction was almost same as Pre to Interim and Interim to Final. There was no group activity for the Control group and each was continuing their own regular physical activities similar to pre interim period.

The PSS was validated using college students or workers [30]. Our all subjects were working. The PSS is used for measuring the perceived stress [47]. In our study PSS reduced with significance (p<0.001) consistently in Pre Interim and Pre Final in yoga group alone. The yoga practice reduced anxiety and depression scores in mixed male female obese group of grade 2 obesity, BMI 31.37 ± 6.64 with psychological problems [48]. Improvement in depression and anxiety was mostly correlated with improvements in WC and HC [48]. Our study showed that yoga practice during Interim and Final also reduced the perceived stress in obese male of BMI 28.7±2.3. In IAYT module there are many components such as Suryanamaskara Pranayama Body awareness etc which reduces the stress levels [24]. This shows that in the Final, the stress level was reduced and that also might have improved their food habits and promoted weight reduction.

The Pre Final correlation results show that BMI was positively correlated to WC, SKFT, HC and AAQW. These correlations were supportive to earlier short terms studies [48]. The PSS was negatively correlated to MACL (r=-0.291, p<0.01) and MACR (r=-0.300, p<0.01). Higher MAC indicate chronic energy deficiency [49]. Thus, anthropometric and psychological parameters are found to be correlated in obese and the long term yoga practice improves these parameters.

Previous studies showed that short and long term yoga interventions reduce anxiety and mood changes [44,50]. The psychological stress increases cortisol secretion and abdominal fat in an RCT on female [51]. The mindfulness practices modify eating disorders. Our study support that the reduction of abdominal fat in male is consistent with reduction in perceived stress reduction.

Strengths Limitations and Future Scope

Our study is one of the earliest RCTs on male obesity and long term yoga (six months) in urban setting along with assessments of PSS and AAQW. It was reported that people with some belief in yoga join to such programme [21]. Though, all our subjects were new to yoga this point is relevant. Future studies can be taken in different cross sections and in different cities where the eating habits and consumption of junk food could be different. The accurate food log plays a vital role in control of the eating and the smart phone or web based methods will be easier than hand written food log [52,53]. The age group in our study was large to get more sample size and for longer period study. However, the age distribution was similar in both groups by minimization of co factors. Also, the urban human habits of junk food eating, sedentary life etc., are common for all age groups. Further studies can be done with smaller range of age groups and at various cities (probably having varying food habits).

Conclusion

The anthropometric parameters and percentage body fat showed improvement in the Final result. Some of the improvements including AAQW score obtained during the 14 weeks training was lost in the Final value. The PSS score was improved consistently. The fat reduction was effective at central and peripheral parts in the Interim to Final result. Reduction of abdominal fat on male is correlated to reduction in perceived stress. The yoga practice is effective for obesity control for adult male in urban setting.

BMI- Body Mass IndexPre: Before interventionPaired sample t test was done for all the above Table/Fig 4WT: weightMACL: Mid upper arm circumference of left handMACR: Mid arm circumference of right handHC: Hip circumferenceRAB: Triceps skin fold thicknessSTOF: Suprailiac skin fold thicknessSHOB: Sub scapular skin fold thicknessBMI: Body mass indexSKFT: Cumulative skin fold thicknessPSS: Perceived stress scale scoreAAQW: Action and weight relayed difficulty scoreWilcoxon signed ranks test was done for Not Normally distributed variablesb- based on positive ranksc- based on negative ranksWC: Waist circumferenceRAF: Biceps skin fold thicknessWHR: Waist hip ratioPFC Percentage fat(based on skin fold thickness)An independent sample t test was applied between yoga & control groupsWT: weightMACL: Mid upper arm circumference of left handMACR: Mid upper arm circumference of right handHC: Hip circumferenceRAB: Triceps skin fold thicknessSHOB: Subscapular skin fold thicknessSTOF: Suprailiac skin fold thicknessBMI: body mass indexSKFT Cumulative skin fold thicknessPSS: Perceived stress scale scoreAAQW: Action and weight relayed difficulty score**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).Bivariate -Pearson correlation test appliedWT: weightMACL: Mid arm circumference leftMACR: Mid arm circumference rightHC: Hip circumferenceWC: Waist circumferenceRAF:Biceps skin fold thicknessRAB: Triceps skin fold thicknessSHOB: Sub scapular skin fold thicknessSTOF: Suprailiac skin fold thicknessBMI: body mass indexWHR: Waist hip ratioPFC: Percentage fatSKFT: Cumulative skin fold thicknessPSS: Perceived stress scale scoreAAQW: Action and weight relayed difficulty scorePaired sample t test was applied for all Normally distributed variables and Wilcoxon signed ranks test was applied for Not Normally distributed variablesb- based on positive ranks, c- based on negative ranksWT: weightMACL: Mid arm circumference leftMACR: Mid arm circumference rightHC: Hip circumferenceWC: Waist circumferenceWHR: Waist hip ratioPFC: Percentage body fatBMI: body mass indexSKFT: Cumulative skin fold thicknessSKFRAF: Biceps skin fold thicknessSKFRAB: Triceps skin fold thicknessSKFSHOB: Sub scapular skin fold thicknessSKFSTOF: Suprailiac skin fold thicknessPSS: Perceived stress scale scoreAAQW: Action and weight relayed difficulty score

References

[1]WHO Obesity. World Health Organization; cited 2016 Mar 31; Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/obesity/en/  [Google Scholar]

[2]Prasad D, Dash A, Kabir Z, Das B, Prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians: A community study from urban Eastern India J Cardiovasc Dis Res 2012 3(3):204  [Google Scholar]

[3]Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Rising burden of obesity in Asia J Obesity 2010 2010:868573  [Google Scholar]

[4]Singh RB, Pella D, Mechirova V, Kartikey K, Demeester F, Tomar RS, Prevalence of obesity, physical inactivity and undernutrition, a triple burden of diseases during transition in a developing economy. The Five City Study Group Acta Cardiol 2007 62(2):119-27.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Dhurandhar NV, Kulkarni PR, Prevalence of obesity in Bombay Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992 16(5):367-75.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Yadav K, Krishnan A, Changing patterns of diet, physical activity and obesity among urban, rural and slum populations in north India Obes Rev 2008 9(5):400-08.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Deepa M, Farooq S, Deepa R, Manjula D, Mohan V, Prevalence and significance of generalized and central body obesity in an urban Asian Indian population in Chennai, India Eur J Clin Nutr 2009 63(2):259-67.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM, Vikram NK, Wasir JS, Chadha D, Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management J Assoc Physicians India 2009 57:163-70.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Kalra S, Unnikrishnan A, Obesity in India: The weight of the nation J Med Nutr Nutraceuticals 2012 1(1):37  [Google Scholar]

[10]Snehalatha C, Viswanathan V, Ramachandran A, Cutoff values for normal anthropometric variables in asian Indian adults Diabetes Care 2003 26(5):1380-84.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Mini Sheth NS, The Scientific Way to Managing Obesity 2011 2011th edNew Delhi:162  [Google Scholar]

[12]Singh SP, Sikri G, Garg MK, Body Mass Index and Obesity: Tailoring “cut-off” for an Asian Indian male population MJAFI 2008 64(4):350-53.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Dehghan M, Akhtar-Danesh N, Merchant AT, Childhood obesity, prevalence and prevention Nutr J 2005 4:24  [Google Scholar]

[14]Karnik S, Kanekar A, Childhood obesity: a global public health crisis Int J Prev Med 2012 3:1-7.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Thayer KA, Heindel JJ, Bucher JR, Gallo MA, Role of Environmental Chemicals in Diabetes and Obesity: A National Toxicology Program Workshop Review. Vol. 120 Environmental Health Perspectives 2012 :779-89.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Christakis NA, Fowler JH, The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years N Engl J Med 2007 357:370-79.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Dhurandhar NV, Obesity in India: Opportunities for clinical research J Obes Metab R 2014 1(1):25-29.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Taimni IK, The Science of Yoga 2010 First 12thChennaiThe theosophical society Adayar:448  [Google Scholar]

[19]Iyenkar BKS, The core of the yoga-sutras, haper Thorosons London, 2012  [Google Scholar]

[20]Udupa KN, Stress and its management 2000 DelhiMotilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt Ltd:395  [Google Scholar]

[21]Bernstein AM, Bar J, Ehrman JP, Golubic M, Roizen MF, Yoga in the management of overweight and obesity American J of Lifestyle Medicine 2013 8(1):33-41.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Rshikesan PB, Pailoor S, Effect of IAYT (Integrated Approach of Yoga Therapy) on male obesity/overweight and related psychological parameters- a Randomized Controlled Trail JCDR 2016 10(10):KC01-06.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Altman DG, Bland JM, Treatment allocation by minimisation BMJ 2005 330:843  [Google Scholar]

[24]Dhananjai S, Sadashiv Tiwari S, Dutt K, Kumar R, Reducing psychological distress and obesity through Yoga practice Int J Yoga 2013 6:66-70.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A, G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences Behav Res Methods 2007 39:175-91.  [Google Scholar]

[26]National Institute of Nutritiion DIETARY GUIDELINES - A Manual. 2011;139  [Google Scholar]

[27]Dabhadkar KC, Deshmukh A, Bellam N, Tuliani T, Body shape index predicts cardiovascular mortality independent of BMI J Am Coll Cardiol 2013 61:E1364  [Google Scholar]

[28]Krakauer NY, Krakauer JC, A new body shape index predicts mortality hazard independently of body mass index PLoS One 2012 :7  [Google Scholar]

[29]Romero-Corral A, Somers VK, Sierra-Johnson J, Thomas RJ, Collazo-Clavell ML, Korinek J, Accuracy of body mass index in diagnosing obesity in the adult general population Int J Obes (Lond) 2008 32:959-66.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Lee EH, Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Vol. 6 Asian Nursing Research 2012 :121-27.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Niemeier HM, Leahey T, Palm Reed K, Brown RA, Wing RR, An acceptance based behavioural intervention for weight loss-a pilot study Reed Behavioural Therapy 2012 42(2):427-35.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Lillis J, Hayes SC, Measuring avoidance and inflexibility in weight related problems Int J Behav Consult Ther 2008 4:348-54.  [Google Scholar]

[33]West J, Manchester B, Wright J, Lawlor DA, Waiblinger D, Reliability of routine clinical measurements of neonatal circumferences and research measurements of neonatal skinfold thicknesses: Findings from the Born in Bradford study Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011 25:164-71.  [Google Scholar]

[34]Kannieappan LM, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, Yelland L, Dodd JM, Developing a tool for obtaining maternal skinfold thickness measurements and assessing inter-observer variability among pregnant women who are overweight and obese BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013 13:42  [Google Scholar]

[35]Durnin JV, Womersley J, Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years Br J Nutr 1974 32(1):77-97.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Donoghue WC. How to measure your % bodyfat. 1999;22. Available from: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00072CPFY  [Google Scholar]

[37]Saghaei M, Implementation of an open-i customizable minimization program for allocation of patients to parallel groups in clinical trials J Biomed Sci Eng 2011 04(11):734-39.  [Google Scholar]

[38]Scott NW, McPherson GC, Ramsay CR, Campbell MK, The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: A review Control Clin Trials 2002 23:662-74.  [Google Scholar]

[39]Seo DY, Lee S, Figueroa A, Kim HK, Baek YH, Kwak YS, Yoga training improves metabolic parameters in obese boys Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 2012 16(3):175-80.  [Google Scholar]

[40]Telles S, Sharma SK, Yadav A, Singh N, Balkrishna A, A comparative controlled trial comparing the effects of yoga and walking for overweight and obese adults Med Sci Monit 2014 20:894-904.  [Google Scholar]

[41]Telles S, Naveen VK, Balkrishna A, Kumar S, Short term health impact of a yoga and diet change program on obesity Med Sci Monit 2010 16(1):35-40.  [Google Scholar]

[42]Sarría A, García-Llop LA, Moreno LA, Fleta J, Morellón MP, Bueno M, Skinfold thickness measurements are better predictors of body fat percentage than body mass index in male Spanish children and adolescents Eur J Clin Nutr 1998 52(8):573-76.  [Google Scholar]

[43]Sarvottam K, Yadav RK, Obesity-related inflammation & cardiovascular disease: efficacy of a yoga-based lifestyle intervention Indian J Med Res 2014 139(6):822-34.  [Google Scholar]

[44]Gupta N, Khera S, Vempati RP, Sharma R, Bijlani RL, Effect of yoga based lifestyle intervention on state and trait anxiety Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2006 50(1):41-47.  [Google Scholar]

[45]McCaffrey R, Ruknui P, Hatthakit U, Kasetsomboon P, The effects of yoga on hypertensive persons in Thailand Holistic Nursing Practice 2005 19:173-80.  [Google Scholar]

[46]Niemeier HM, Leahey T, Palm Reed K, Brown RA, Wing RR, An acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss: a pilot study Behav Ther 2012 43(2):427-35.  [Google Scholar]

[47]Cohen S, Perceived stress Scale Psychology [Internet] 1994 :1-3.Available from: http://www.mindgarden.com/products/pss.html  [Google Scholar]

[48]Dhananjai S, Sadashiv Tiwari S, Dutt K, Kumar R, Reducing psychological distress and obesity through Yoga practice Int J Yoga 2013 6(1):66-70.  [Google Scholar]

[49]Chakraborty R, Bose K, Bisai S, Mid-upper arm circumference as a measure of nutritional status among adult Bengalee male slum dwellers of Kolkata, India: relationship with self reported morbidity Anthropol Anzeiger; Bericht über die Biol Lit 2009[cited 2016 May 9] 67(2):129-37.  [Google Scholar]

[50]Yoshihara K, Hiramoto T, Sudo N, Kubo C, Profile of mood states and stress-related biochemical indices in long-term yoga practitioners Biopsychosoc Med 2011 5:6  [Google Scholar]

[51]Daubenmier J, Kristeller J, Hecht FM, Maninger N, Kuwata M, Jhaveri K, Mindfulness intervention for stress eating to reduce cortisol and abdominal fat among overweight and obese women: An exploratory randomized controlled study J Obes 2011 2011:651936  [Google Scholar]

[52]González C, Herrero P, Cubero JM, Iniesta JM, Hernando ME, García-Sáez G, PREDIRCAM eHealth platform for individualized telemedical assistance for lifestyle modification in the treatment of obesity, diabetes, and cardiometabolic risk prevention: a pilot study (PREDIRCAM 1) J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013 7(4):888-97.  [Google Scholar]

[53]Aizawa K, Maeda K, Ogawa M, Sato Y, Kasamatsu M, Waki K, Comparative Study of the Routine Daily Usability of FoodLog: A Smartphone-based Food Recording Tool Assisted by Image Retrieval J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014 8(2):203-08.  [Google Scholar]