JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Community Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21325.8939
Year : 2016 | Month : Nov | Volume : 10 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : LC24 - LC27

Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans among Brazilian Women of Reproductive Age

Mateus De Paula Glehn1, Lana Cristina Evangelista Sá Ferreira2, Hian Delfino Ferreira Da Silva3, Eleuza Rodrigues Machado4

1 Family Health team coordination – Federal District Health Department; Tropical Medicine Department – University of Brasília.
2 Trainee, Laboratory of Parasitology and Vector Biology of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia.
3 Trainee, Laboratory of Parasitology and Vector Biology of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia.
4 Professor and Postgraduation advisor, Laboratory of Parasitology and Vector Biology of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Mateus De Paula Glehn, Quadra 102, lote 04, Edifício Sol Nascente, apto 903, Águas Claras – Brasília/DF, Brazil, CEP 71907-000.
E-mail: mateusmatteus@yahoo.com.br
Abstract

Introduction

There are no studies assessing the simultaneous occurrence of Candida albicans (C. albicans) and Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis) in the primary health care in Brazil. Despite different conditions to establishment of each one, the co-detection of both has been reported by some authors in previous studies from other regions.

Aim

To compare the prevalence of T. vaginalis and C. albicans in correlation with associated variables.

Materials and Methods

A cross-divtional study conducted in a family health clinic in the Federal District of Brazil, between November 2014 and March 2015. Vaginal swabs were collected from 201 women of the reproductive age selected from women registered at the family health clinic. Minors and pregnant women were excluded. The rates of T. vaginalis and Candida albicans prevalence were evaluated with vaginal pH, the whiff test, sexual practices and other social and demographic variables. Difference between proportions was assessed by Z-Test.

Results

C. albicans was present in 20% of the women, while 16% of them had T. vaginalis. The simultaneous occurrence of the agents was found in 1.5%. Significant differences were found between prevalence rates for the variables race/skin colour, practice of anilingus and lifetime number of sexual partners.

Conclusion

The prevalence of T. vaginalis exceeds C.albicans among women with higher numbers of sexual partners. The prevalence of C. albicans was higher than T. vaginalis among white women and those who practice active and receptive anilingus. The simultaneous occurrence of the two microorganisms was uncommon.

Keywords

Introduction

Vaginal infections are common among women of reproductive age [1]. They can be caused by sexually transmitted microorganisms or by some disorder resulting in the proliferation of endogenous microbiota [1]. Among the more frequent microorganisms are the protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis) [2] and Candida albicans (C. albicans) [3].

T.vaginalis is a flagellate protozoan, facultative anaerobic, extracellular human parasite transmitted by sexual intercourse [4,5]. Classic symptoms of trichomoniasis include greenish yellow malodorous vaginal discharge, accompanied (or not) by local irritation [2]. The vaginal pH of women with trichomoniasis is often above 4.5 [1,6]. However, more than half of those infected are asymptomatic [7]. Risk factors for infection by T.vaginalis are, in general, the same as for other sexually transmitted infections (STI): higher numbers of lifetime sexual partners [7] and irregular use of condoms [8,9]. In a study conducted in a primary care setting, the authors report a T.vaginalis prevalence of 2.6% [10], quite different of that estimated by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (14%), in a study carried out in six Brazilian capitals [11].

Fungi of the genus Candida are commensals, usually found colonizing on human skin and in the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts [12]. Among the causes of vulvovaginitis, Candida spp. infection is the second most prevalent, after bacterial vaginosis [1,13]. It is estimated that one in five women harbour Candida species and other varieties of fungi in the vagina [2] and three out of four women will present at least one episode of vulvovaginal candidiasis during their lifetimes [14,15].

Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (VVC) is defined as the presence of signs of genital irritation/inflammation combined with the presence of Candida spp. in the absence of other aetiologies [12]. Thus, the simple presence of this fungus is not a defined infection. The symptoms of VVC usually include pruritus, burning and curd like vaginal discharge [16]. Candida thrives better at pH values between 3.9 and 5.0 [17]. In general, in the case of VVC, vaginal pH is less than 4.5 [1].

The ability to alternate between different forms of yeast and pseudohyphae is determinant for Candida spp. pathogenesis [18,19]. This occurs in many situations including diabetes mellitus [20], pregnancy [21], vaginal douching [22] and the use of antibiotics [23]. Gunther et al., reported a prevalence of 18.8% of Candida spp. among diabetic women [20].

It is also possible that C.albicans infection, as well as other reproductive tract infections, can be influenced by sexual practices [24,25]. Considering that C.albicans is a part of the intestinal microbiota, its permissible to hypothesize that women colonized by C.albicans in the anal region have more likelihood of having VVC and oral sex has been considered by some authors as a risk factor for developing vulvovaginitis by Candida [23].

Although conditions for the establishment of T.vaginalis in the genital tract differ from those required by Candida spp., the simultaneous presence of these two microorganisms has been found in some women [26,27]. As per our knowledge, in Brazil there is no report of this occurrence in the Primary Health Care (PHC).

To verify the co-existence of these two agents, this study compares the prevalence of T.vaginalis and C.albicans in correlation with vaginal pH, whiff test results, sexual practices and other social and demographic variables.

Materials and Methods

Between November 2014, and March 2015, a cross-sectional study was conducted in the Estrutural City Primary Health Care Unit, located in one of the administrative regions of the Federal District, Midwest region of Brazil. Vaginal swabs were collected for the investigation of C.albicans and T.vaginalis.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Health Department of the Federal District (CAAE 28186514.5.0000.5553).

A total of 201 women agreed to participate in the study. The sample was composed of women of reproductive age, except pregnant women and minors (less than 18 years), who were outpatients of the clinic. Women between 18 and 49 years of age were consecutively invited to participate, regardless of the reason for coming to the clinic.

The sample size was calculated considering the number of registered women in the clinic as a finite population, and assuming a 10% prevalence of T. vaginalis infection with a 5% confidence interval. An adequate sample was calculated to be composed of 116 participants. Predicting a loss of 20%, the sample was increased to 139 women. In carrying out the collection of data, a total of 201 women participated and 193 of them were examined. Eight of them were not examined for diverse reasons, like presence of menstrual flow or even desistence.

Data Collection

A structured questionnaire was applied by a trained female interviewer in which the participants were asked about complaints that had occurred during the past four weeks. The participants also were asked about sociodemographic information (age, education, smoking) and sexual practices. Following interrogation, all the participants were referred to the examination room, regardless of whether or not they have complaints.

During the physical examination, after introduction of the vaginal speculum, an indicator strip was used to assess the pH of the secretion. Graduated strips were used at intervals of 0.3 units, with pH ranging between 3.6 and 6.1 (pH-Fix®, Macherey-Nagel, Ref 92130). The strips were placed in the middle third of the right side wall of the vagina. After the change in colour they were compared with the standardized colour chart provided by the manufacturer.

The whiff test was performed by adding a drop of 10% KOH to the vaginal secretion, previously collected with an Ayre spatula and disposed on a glass slide. The test was considered positive with the release of a characteristic fishy odour. In sequence, a sterile swab was applied against the posterior side wall of the vagina and placed in TYM (Trypticase - Yeast extract - maltose) culture medium, as proposed by Diamond [28]. On the contra lateral wall of the vagina, another sterile swab was rubbed and subsequently immersed in Stuart transport medium.

Samples were transported to the Laboratory of Parasitology and Vector Biology of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Brasilia. The plates with TYM culture medium were placed in an incubator at 37°C. The swabs in the Stuart culture medium were plated in Sabouraud agar for isolation of fungi of the genus Candida spp.

The plates with TYM culture medium were examined after 24, 48 and 72 hours. After 96 hours, the culture was washed with 5 mL of 0.9% saline solution, transferred to test tubes and centrifuged at 2,500 g for five minutes. The supernatants were discarded and the remaining pellets were examined. For each sample, 100 μL of the pellets were placed on glass slides and examined under an optical microscope at 40X. A second slide was made and allowed to dry at room temperature. This second slide was fixed with methanol, stained with Giemsa and examined under the microscope at 100X. The results were considered positive when the presence of the parasite on either of the slides was verified [10,29].

The swabs immersed in Stuart medium were rubbed on plates with Sabouraud agar for the isolation of fungi of the genus Candida, as suggested by the manufacturer (Neogen, Michigan, USA). These plates were placed in an incubator (B.O.B, MA 415) at 28°C for 72 hours. After this time, the plates were examined under a loupe (Olympus SZ 40) and the Colony Forming Units (CFU) were counted. The samples were positive if they formed colonies of Candida spp as described in the literature [30].

Germ Tube Test

For determination of the Candida spp. species in the positive cultures, samples of the colonies were subjected to the germ tube test. This structure is a filament that sprouts from yeast, and whose presence allows the presumptive identification of C.albicans [30].

For this test, part of the colony was taken from the plate and placed in an Eppendorf microtube containing 5mL bovine fetal serum. After 30 minutes and within two hours, a drop of serum-yeast suspension was placed on the slides and they were observed under an optical microscope.

Statistical Analysis

Information was collected regarding age, years of education, race/skin colour, hormonal contraception, smoking, sexual practices, pH and whiff test results.

The race/skin colour variable was measured according to the self-declaration of each participant. After observing that more than half of the women declared that they were of mixed race or black, the variable was grouped into two categories (white and non-white).

The differences between the proportions were verified with a one tailed test, which was considered significant when Z-calculated > Z-critical. In the case of a one tailed curve, with an error of 5%, Z-critical equals 1.64.

Results

The average age of the participants was 34 years (95% CI: 30.7 – 37.3), most of whom were of mixed races (58%). More than half of the women (54%) had eight years or less of formal education. Thirty-four women (17%) reported having had some Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) at some point in life.

Gynaecological complaints were common among participants, predominantly lower abdominal pain (50%), and followed by reports of vaginal discharge (46%). Thirty women (30/193) were positive for Trichomonas vaginalis (16%; 95% CI: 11-21%) and among the women with positive samples, the most frequent complaint was vaginal discharge (57%). Of women with positive cultures, 27 (90%) had at least one complaint, although three (10%) of them had no complaints [Table/Fig-1]. The average number of lifetime sexual partners of the women with T. vaginalis was 9.4.

Distribution of women, according to the rates of prevalence of T. vaginalis, C. albicans and gynaecological complaints.

Complaintsn*Tv Prevalence (%)Candida Prevalence (%)VariationZcalc
Vaginal discharge920.180.200.010.11
Itching560.180.320.141.40
Burning540,200.260.060.55
Malodorours discharge660.180.210.030.32
Dyspareunia680.220.21-0.01-0.15
Lower abdominal pain1010.150.180.030.33
Previous STD330.240.18-0.06-0.61

*n: number of participants


Thirty-nine women (39/193) were positive for Candida albicans and vaginal discharge. Itching and lower abdominal pain occurred in the same proportions (46%). Among women with positive cultures, six (15%) were completely asymptomatic [Table/Fig-1]. The average number of sexual partners of the women positive for C. albicans was 5.6.

The co-existence of T.vaginalis and C.albicans was observed in three women, representing 1.55% of the women examined. The rates of prevalence were similar in correlations between many of the variables, except three of them: 1) More than 10 partners throughout life – the prevalence of T. vaginalis (50%) exceeded the prevalence of Candida (19%) significantly; 2) The prevalence of Candida among women who practiced active (14%) and receptive (21%) anilingus was higher than the prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis (0%); and 3) The prevalence of C. albicans exceeded the prevalence of T. vaginalis among white women – 26% versus 11%.

For the other variables, there were no significant differences between the prevalence of C.albicans and T.vaginalis [Table/Fig-2].

Distribution of women, according to the rates of prevalence of T. vaginalis and C.albicans and sociodemographic variables, sexual practices, pH and the whiff test.

Characteriscticsn*Tv Prevalence (%)Candida Prevalence (%)VariationZcalc
Sociodemographic
Education up 8 years1020.190.17-0.02-0.21
Age > 30 years1200.170.300.131.33
White470.110.260.151.66
Non-white1460.170.180.010.15
Smoking270.190.11-0.07-0.85
Oral contraceptive390.130.130.000.00
Sexual intercourse < 15 years630.240.11-0.13-1.37
Three or less partners1050.100.170.070.81
More than 10 partners160.500.19-0.31-2.82
Practices
Anal intercourse340.180.240.060.60
Oral active860.150.200.050.51
Oral receptive960.160.220.060.67
Anilingus (active)70.000.140.142.55
Anilingus (receptive)140.000.210.213.26
Duche830.140.200.060.66
Condom use350.200.17-0.03-0.30
Tests
pH > 4,5830.180.16-0.02-0.26
Whiff test590.200.14-0.07-0.74

*n: number of participants; significative differences.


Discussion

In the present research, the rates of prevalence of C.albicans and T.vaginalis were not significantly different among women who practiced active or receptive oral sex. Oral sex has been appointed by some authors as a risk factor to develop VVC, but in this study there was no significant association among those who practiced oral sex and positivity for Candida.

In terms of the practice of oroanal sex, the prevalence of Candida was greater than the prevalence of T. vaginalis among women who practiced active and receptive anilingus. In fact, among women positive for T. vaginalis, there was no anilingus practice reported. However, the fact that such practice was uncommon, limited the statistical power to identify significant differences. The prevalence of C.albicans was greater than the prevalence of T. vaginalis among white women.

T. vaginalis is transmitted by sexual contact and its habitat is the human genital and urinary tract [1]. Due to being a classic Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD), one would assume that women with risk factors for STDs would have a higher prevalence of T. vaginalis. Higher numbers of lifetime sexual partners, for example, is a known risk factor for STDs [7]. In this study it was thus not a surprise that among women who reported more than 10 lifetime sexual partners, the prevalence of T. vaginalis significantly exceeded the prevalence of C. albicans.

Among the women of the sample, three were simultaneously positive for C. albicans and T. vaginalis. This represented 1.55% of the women examined.

The simultaneous encounter of both microorganisms have been reported by other authors [Table/Fig-3] [26,27,3137], and varies from 0% [35] to 21.73% [31]. However, most of the studies were conducted in the secondary care and one included only symptomatic women [32]. One study conducted in the Primary Health Care (PHC) report 0,23% of mixed infection by T. vaginalis and C. albicans [26] while another one, also conducted in the PHC, reported a co-infection of 14% [27]. Both of these studies used molecular biology and the disparities can be in part explained by different populations studied. Even so, there is a lack of knowledge about the required conditions to the co-existence of these two microorganisms, given that they require different environmental needs.

Studies reporting the co-detection of C. albicans and T. vaginalis in women [26,27,3137].

AuthorsReferencesYearNumber ofwomenAge group(years)Mean age(years)T. vaginalis and C. albicans co-detection
n%
Levi AW, Harigopal M, Hui P, Schofield K, Chhieng DC.[26]201143117-793310,23
Alo M, Anyim C, Onyebuchi A, Okonkwo E[31]2012150020-40not mentioned32621,73
López-Monteon A, Gómez-Figueroa FS, Ramos-Poceros G, Guzmán-Gómez D, Ramos-Ligonio A[27]201325214-90not mentioned3614,29
Arora BB, Maheshwari M, Devgan N, Arora DR (rural population)[32]2014467215-76not mentioned2946,3
Arora BB, Maheshwari M, Devgan N, Arora DR (urban population)[32]2014795018-70not mentioned00
Ghaffari S, Bayani M, Kalantari N[33]20143360017-7334,7460,14
Kadir MA, Sulyman MA, Dawood IS, Shams-Eldin S[34]201425015-60not mentioned41,60
Olowe OA, Makanjuola OB, Olowe R, Adekanle DA[35]201410021-3928,100
Olorode OA, Mark OO, Ezenobi NO[36]201422018-55not mentioned73,18
Nsagha DS, Zofou D, Assob JCN, Njunda AL, Nchang CD, MvoNgum N, et al[37]201524915-5628,731,20

Study replication with larger samples in different settings may help to better understand the distribution of these two microorganisms and their association with infrequent variables.

Limitation

A limitation of the study was the fact that sexual practices are part of the private life of the individual. Not all of the women in the study felt comfortable answering in a sincere manner, even when guaranteed confidentiality.

Conclusion

We can conclude that the rates of prevalence of T.vaginalis and C.albicans in the women examined were high; however, the occurrence of co-infection with the two etiologic agents was not common. Among women with higher numbers of sexual partners during the lifetime, the prevalence of T.vaginalis exceeded the prevalence of C.albicans. The prevalence of C.albicans was higher than the prevalence of T. vaginalis among white women and among those who practiced active and receptive oral anal sex.

The possibility of using self-administered questionnaires may be an interesting alternative to increase the possibility of more accurate answers, if we take into account that some participants could feel uncomfortable to respond questions about their sexual practices.

*n: number of participants*n: number of participants; significative differences.

References

[1]Frobenius W, Bogdan C, Diagnostic value of vaginal discharge, wet mount and vaginal pH - an update on the basics of gynecologic infectiology Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015 75(4):355-66.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015 :1-137.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Angebault C, Djossou F, Abélanet S, Permal E, Ben Soltana M, Diancourt L, Candida albicans is not always the preferential yeast colonizing humans: a study in Wayampi Amerindians J Infect Dis 2013 208(10):1705-16.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Poole DN, McClelland RS, Global epidemiology of Trichomonas vaginalis Sex Transm Infect 2013 89:418-22.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Kissinger P, Trichomonas vaginalis: a review of epidemiologic, clinical and treatment issues BMC Infect Dis 2015 15(1):307  [Google Scholar]

[6]Manshoori A, Mirzaei S, Valadkhani Z, Kazemi Arababadi M, Rezaeian M, Zainodini N, A diagnostic and symptomatological study on trichomoniasis in symptomatic pregnant women in Rafsanjan, South Central Iran in 2012-13 Iran J Parasitol 2015 10(3):490-97.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Sutton M, Sternberg M, Koumans EH, McQuillan G, Berman S, Markowitz L, The prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among reproductive-age women in the United States, 2001-2004 Clin Infect Dis 2007 45(10):1319-26.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Bachmann LH, Hobbs MM, Sena AC, Sobel JD, Schwebke JR, Krieger JN, Trichomonas vaginalis genital infections: progress and challenges Clin Infect Dis 2011 53(suppl 3):S160-72.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Crosby R a, Charnigo R a, Weathers C, Caliendo AM, Shrier L a, Condom effectiveness against non-viral sexually transmitted infections: a prospective study using electronic daily diaries Sex Transm Infect 2012 88(7):484-89.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Grama DF, Casarotti L d. S, Morato MGV d. A, Silva LS, Mendonca DF, Limongi JE, Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis and risk factors in women treated at public health units in Brazil: a transversal study Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2013 107(9):584-91.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Brasil. [Prevalências e freqüências relativas de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis (DST) em populações selecionadas de seis capitais brasileiras, 2005]. Brasília, Brasil; 2008. Pp. 224  [Google Scholar]

[12]Achkar JM, Fries BC, Candida infections of the genitourinary tract Clin Microbiol Rev 2010 23(2):253-73.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Sobel JD, Genital Candidiasis Sexually Transmitted Infections and Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2011 Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer Berlin Heidelberg:613-24.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Sobel JD, Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 214(1):15-21.  [Google Scholar]

[15]De Bernardis F, Arancia S, Sandini S, Graziani S, Norelli S, Studies of immune responses in Candida vaginitis Pathog (Basel, Switzerland) 2015 4(4):697-707.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Rodrigues MT, Gonçalves AC, Alvim MCT, Castellano Filho DS, Zimmermmann JB, da Silva VL, Association between vaginal secretion culture, socio-demographic characteristics and clinical manifestations of patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis Rev Bras Ginecol e Obstet Rev da Fed Bras das Soc Ginecol e Obstet 2013 35(12):554-61.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Du H, Huang G, Environmental pH adaption and morphological transitions in Candida albicans Curr Genet 2016 62(2):283-86.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Shareck J, Belhumeur P, Modulation of morphogenesis in Candida albicans by various small molecules Eukaryot Cell 2011 10(8):1004-12.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Lu Y, Su C, Liu H, Candida albicans hyphal initiation and elongation Trends Microbiol 2014 22(12):707-14.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Gunther LSA, Martins HPR, Gimenes F, Abreu ALP de, Consolaro MEL, Svidzinski TIE, Prevalence of Candida albicans and non-albicans isolates from vaginal secretions: comparative evaluation of colonization, vaginal candidiasis and recurrent vaginal candidiasis in diabetic and non-diabetic women São Paulo Med J = Rev Paul Med 2014 132(2):116-20.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Hay P, Czeizel AE, Asymptomatic trichomonas and Candida colonization and pregnancy outcome Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007 21(3):403-09.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Dou N, Li W, Zhao E, Wang C, Xiao Z, Zhou H, Risk factors for Candida infection of the genital tract in the tropics Afr Health Sci 2014 14(4):835-39.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Xu J, Schwartz K, Bartoces M, Monsur J, Severson RK, Sobel JD, Effect of antibiotics on vulvovaginal candidiasis: a MetroNet study J Am Board Fam Med 2008 21(4):261-68.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Gill AR, Ravanfar P, Mendoza N, Tyring SK, Sexual Behavior and Psychological Aspects Associated with Sexually Transmitted Infections Sexually Transmitted Infections and Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2011 Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer Berlin Heidelberg:35-42.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Ballini A, Cantore S, Fatone L, Montenegro V, De Vito D, Pettini F, Transmission of nonviral sexually transmitted infections and oral sex J Sex Med 2012 9(2):372-84.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Levi AW, Harigopal M, Hui P, Schofield K, Chhieng DC, Comparison of Affirm VPIII and Papanicolaou Tests in the Detection of Infectious Vaginitis Am J Clin Pathol 2011 135(3):442-47.  [Google Scholar]

[27]López-Monteon A, Gómez-Figueroa FS, Ramos-Poceros G, Guzmán-Gómez D, Ramos-Ligonio A, Codetection of Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans by PCR in urine samples in a low-risk population attended in a clinic first level in Central Veracruz, Mexico Biomed Res Int 2013 2013:1-7.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Hobbs MM, Seña AC, Modern diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection Sex Transm Infect 2013 89(6):434-38.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Arbabi M, Fakhrieh Z, Delavari M, Abdoli A, Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in Kashan city, Iran (2012-2013) Iran J Reprod Med 2014 12(7):507-12.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Souza MN, Ortiz SO, Mello MM, Oliveira F de M, Severo LC, Goebel CS, Comparison between four usual methods of identification of Candida species Rev do Inst Med Trop São Paulo 2015 57(4):281-87.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Alo M, Anyim C, Onyebuchi A, Okonkwo E, Prevalence of asymptomatic co-infection of candidiasis and vaginal trichomoniasis among pregnant women in Abakaliki, South-Eastern Nigeria J Nat Sci Res 2012 2(7):87-91.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Arora BB, Maheshwari M, Devgan N, Arora DR, Prevalence of Trichomoniasis, Vaginal Candidiasis, Genital Herpes, Chlamydiasis, and Actinomycosis among Urban and Rural Women of Haryana, India J Sex Transm Dis 2014 2014:1-5.  [Google Scholar]

[33]Ghaffari S, Bayani M, Kalantari N, Trichomonas, Candida, and Gardnerella in cervical smears of Iranian women for cancer screening N Am J Med Sci 2014 6(1):25  [Google Scholar]

[34]Kadir MA, Sulyman MA, Dawood IS, Shams-Eldin S, Trichomonas vaginalis and associated microorganisms in women with vaginal discharge in Kerkuk-Iraq Ankara Med J 2014 14(3)  [Google Scholar]

[35]Olowe OA, Makanjuola OB, Olowe R, Adekanle DA, Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women receiving antenatal care in Southwestern Nigeria Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2014 4(4):193-97.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Olorode OA, Mark OO, Ezenobi NO, Urinogenital trichomoniasis in women in relation to candidiasis and gonorrhoea in University of Port-Harcourt Teaching Hospital African J Microbiol Res 2014 8(26):2482-85.  [Google Scholar]

[37]Nsagha DS, Zofou D, Assob JCN, Njunda AL, Nchang CD, MvoNgum N, The epidemiology of Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis and Candida albicans co-infections in women attending the Yaounde University Teaching Hospital Am J Epidemiol Infect Dis 2015 3(2)Science and Education Publishing:28-31.  [Google Scholar]