JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Psychiatry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/22636.8772
Year : 2016 | Month : Nov | Volume : 10 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : VC01 - VC04

Headache Disability, Suicidality and Pain Catastrophization - Are They Related

Harshal Rathod1, Dushad Ram2, Harsha Sundarmurthy3, Snehal Rathod4, Deepa John5

1 Resident, Department of Neurology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
3 Professor, Department of Neurology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
4 Pathologist, Apollo Hospital, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
5 Resident, Department of Neurology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Dushad Ram, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital, MG Road, Mysore, Karnataka-570004, India.
E-mail: dushadram@hotmail.com.
Abstract

Introduction

Studies have found that headache is associated with suicidality. Some demographic and clinical features have been reported to be associated with suicidality. Pain catastrophizing and disability may also have bearing on suicidality in patients with headache.

Aim

To evaluate the relationship between pain disability and catastrophizing in headache and suicidal behaviour.

Materials and Methods

Patients diagnosed with headache were recruited from neurology Out-Patient Department (OPD). With ethical approval and informed consent, patients were subjected to a structured interview. Headache disability and pain catastrophizing was assessed with the Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) and Pain Catastrophy Scale (PCS) respectively. For evaluation of suicidal ideation and behaviour, MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI Plus) scale and The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) were applied. Data was analysed with Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test using appropriate statistical programs.

Results

In 200 patients of headache, male: female ratio was 0.48: 1. Headache disability was significantly higher in females (p=0.060) and unemployed (p=0.019) patients whereas, pain catastrophizing was significant in patients belonging to low socioeconomic class (p=0.045). Headache disability and pain catastrophizing had significant association with suicidal ideation. Disability score was significantly associated with the score of deterrents (p=0.067) and controllability (p=0.039) subscale of intensity of suicidal ideation. There were four patients who actually attempted suicide. Pain catastrophizing was significantly associated with non-suicidal self injurious behaviour (p=0.041).

Conclusion

Disability due to headache and pain catastrophizing is associated with increased suicidal tendencies, behaviour and suicidal attempts. Headache in females and patients in rural habitat, unemployed individuals belonging to low socioeconomic class need special attention to reduce high risk suicidal behaviour.

Keywords

Introduction

Headache is the commonest neurological disorder with life-time prevalence of 78% [1]. Tension-type is the commonest headache followed by migraine headaches [1]. Recurrent headaches impair the Quality of Life (QoL) of an individual [2]. Migraine is the sixth highest cause of disability worldwide [2]. Medication-Overuse Headache (MOH) that often accompany with migraine or tension headache also leads to disability in large number of patients [2]. Combined together, headache disorders rank as third among the worldwide causes of disability, as measured in Years of Life Lost to Disability (YLDs) [3].

A total of 68-94% of patients may experience moderate to severe disability on the functioning of activities of daily living [4,5]. These estimates has implications in Indian context because over 16% of the world’s population lives in India [6]. In India prevalence of headache is more than the avarage report from other countries [7]. Rao et al., observed a prevalence of headache disorders to be 23% in general population, a significant disease burden in Indian poplation [8]. Bera et al., reported that in north India subjects with migraine, 5% had suicidality and 60% had very severe to substantial impact on functioning. Similarly, in subject with tension headache suicidality incresased to 7.5% and 47.7% had very severe to substantial impact on functioning [9]. Efforts to reduce the burden, to minimize the disability and to improve the QoL with headaches lead to the initiation of a global campaign against headache in 2003 [10].

Catastrophizing is a tendency to magnify or exaggerate the threat value or seriousness of pain sensations [11]. Pain catastrophizing is identified as an independent risk factor for predicting chronicity of pain and is associated with poor prognosis and disability in recurrent pain disorder [12]. Increased intensity of pain and disability associated with headaches increases the risk of suicidal tendencies [1]. Further; presence of psychiatric co-morbidity may increase the risk of suicide in such individuals [13].

As mentioned earlier headache prevalence from India is 63% of which 22% being severe headache [14]. Figures on suicide rate in India suggest that about 11 per million populations have suicidal tendencies and this rate is increasing over-time [15].

Thus, suicidality can have a positive correlation to pain catastrophizing and disability in patients with headaches. Given the lack of literature evidence from India related to this subject, we aimed to examine the relationship of suicidality with pain catastrophizing and disability in patient with headache.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a single centre, cross-sectional study at JSS Hospital, Mysuru. For this study, a sample size of 200 was recomended by institutional reviewers, which was based on num-ber of patients reporting with complaint of headache in neurology out patient Department every day and patient selection criteria. The study was carried out over a period of 6 month (May-October, 2015) after approval from the institutional ethics committee. A total 200 consecutive patients were recruited for this study. Adults aged 18 to 65 years of either gender who were diagnosed with primary headache of minimum 3 months duration were included [16]. Any individual with psychiatric disorder (as indentified by ICD 10 diagnosis criteria), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, pregnancy, drug abuse and known cancer were excluded.

After obtaining an informed consent, clinical and neuropsychiatric assessment was done in recruited patients. Sociodemographic and baseline clinical parameters were recorded. Patients were subjected to structured interviews and were further evaluated with assessment tools. The M.I.N.I. Plus (MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview) English Version 5.0.0 was applied to the patients [17]. The M.I.N.I. Plus is a brief structured tool to diagnose axis in psychiatric disorders and symptoms accounted for by an organic cause or by the use of alcohol or drugs in DSM-IV and ICD-10.

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was introduced for identifying suicidal ideation [18]. It has been reported to have high sensitivity and specificity for suicidal behaviour classifications. The domains of suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour which were assessed by C-SSRS are: I) Severity of ideation; II) Intensity of ideation; III) Behaviour; and IV) Lethality.

The Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) was introduced for assessing disability caused by headache. It consists of 25 items, and each items has an option to respond yes (score= 4), sometime (score=2), and no (score =0). It can be grouped in two subscales; emotional and functional. It has scores of minimum of 0 and maximum of 100. Emotional subscale score ranges from 0 to 52 while functional subscale score ranges from 0 to 48. The higher the score the greater the disability caused by the headache [19].

Next, we assessed patients with Pain Catastrophy Scale (PCS) [20]. The PCS provides reflection on past painful experiences and it indicates the degree to which they experienced each of 13 thoughts or feelings when experiencing pain on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time). The PCS total score is computed by summing responses to all 13 items. PCS total scores range from 0 to 52. The PCS subscale includes rumination and magnification. Coefficient alpha for the total PCS is 0.87 [20].

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was done with SPSS version 16. Demographic and clinical characteristics were expressed with descriptive statistics. Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to describe the group difference between three or more variables, while Mann-Whitney Test was used for comparison between two groups. The level of statistical significance was kept at p<0.05 for all tests.

Results

Among 200 participants, most of them were females (n=135, 67.5%), Hindu by religion (n=177, 88.5%) married (n=153, 76.5%), and were educated (n=173, 86.5%). Majority of them belonged to rural background (n=120, 60%) and were from middle socioeconomic class (n=123, 61.5%), and had nuclear families (n=175, 87.5%). Participants belonging to lower socioeconomic status class had significantly (p=0.045) higher pain catasptrophizing than other socioeconomic class population. No significant differences were observed for any other demographic parameters for pain catastrophizing; though it was higher in females, rural population, Muslim and other religion, nuclear family, married individuals who were uneducated and were employed. More disability (but statistically not significant) was associated with female gender (p=0.060) than males, and unemployed status (p=0.019) of the participants [Table/Fig-1].

Demographic characteristics and its relationship with pain catastrophizing and disability.

VariablesNHDI ScorePCI Score
Mean Rankp-valueMean Rankp-value
GenderMale6589.400.06098.740.765
Female135105.84101.35
DomicileRural120105.630.125102.420.566
Urban8092.8197.62
ReligionHindu177101.620.44799.750.613
Muslim & other2391.87106.24
Socio-economic StatusLower77107.760.160110.860.045*
Middle12395.9694.01
Family TypeNuclear175100.610.941102.990.108
Joint2599.7083.10
Marital StatusSingle4798.460.78291.120.204
Married153101.13103.38
EducationUneducated27111.390.293110.810.319
Educated17398.8098.89
EmploymentUnemployed85111.660.019*96.010.345
Employed11592.25103.82

Mann-Whitney U test, *p<0.05 significant


Significant pain catastrophizing was associated with presence of almost every category of active suicidal ideation including wish to be dead except for active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan [Table/Fig-2]. Similarly, disability had significant association with presence of active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan (p=0.035), active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act (p=0.008), non-specific active suicidal thoughts (p=0.005) [Table/Fig-2]. Disability score had significant group difference on deterrents and controllability subscale on the score of intensity of suicidal ideation [Table/Fig-3]. Fewer number of patients had suicidal behavioural tendencies. Pain catastrophization also had significant association with presence of Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious Behaviour [Table/Fig-4].

Suicidal ideation and its association with pain catastrophizing and disability.

VariablesNHDI ScorePCI Score
Mean Rankp-valueMean Rankp-value
Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intentYes2165.000.113187.500.033*
No19899.8599.62
Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific planYes3170.500.035*162.330.062
No19799.4399.56
Active Suicidal Ideation with Any Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to ActYes4176.620.008*169.750.016*
No19698.9599.09
Non-specific active suicidal thoughtsYes7161.360.005*158.290.007*
No19398.2998.40
Wish to be deadYes22108.110.513126.480.026*
No17899.5697.29

Mann-Whitney U test, *p<0.05 significant


Association of intensity of suicidal ideation with pain catastrophizing and disability.

VariablesN=200HDI ScorePCI Score
Mean Squarep-valueMean Squarep-value
Reasons for Ideation408.2400.458329.3150.089
Deterrents753.4460.383269.4700.067
Controllability455.5980.433481.9410.039*
Duration1060.5300.238252.0730.109
Frequency1060.5300.238252.0730.109
Most Severe Ideation901.9850.295251.0510.110

ANOVA using Kruskal-Wallis, *p<0.05


Association of suicidal behaviour with pain catastrophizing and disability.

VariablesNHDI ScorePCI Score
Mean Rankp-valueMean Rankp-value
Suicidal BehaviourYes1148.500.406175.500.194
No199100.26100.12
Aborted AttemptYes1148.500.406175.500.194
No199100.26100.12
Interrupted AttemptYes2103.000.951103.000.951
No198100.47100.47
Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious BehaviourYes2171.750.080183.750.041*
No19899.7899.66
Actual AttemptYes4145.620.115149.380.088
No19699.5899.50

Mann-Whitney U test, *p<0.05 significant


Discussion

Our study suggests the possible association between pain catastrophizing and disability due to headache with increased suicidal behaviour. This highlights the importance of assessing pain catastrophizing behaviours and disability due to headache, which being very common illness with prevalence as high as 35% [8]. Female gender, rural population, Hindu religion, nuclear family, being married, uneducated and unemployed are likely to have more severe headache disability and pain catastrophizing as identified in our study. Severe headache is usually disabling to the individuals, resulting in interference in day-to-day activities. Such substantial impairments in both physical and psychological functions can seriously impact academic, occupational, social and family lives. Also, female headache sufferers usually tend to outnumber with a ratio of nearly 3 to 1 as compared to males [7]. This was evident in our study as significant number of females had association with disability due to headache. Unemployment was observed to be associated with headache disability. This probably is not surprising since disability due to headache may lead to work absenteeism resulting in higher chances of unemployment [21]. Pain catastrophizing had also been reported to be associated with employment difficulty [22]. Though non-significant, patient who were unemployed had higher association with pain catastrophizing in our study. However, catastrophizing of pain is significantly experienced by those participants who belonged to lower socio-economic status. Higher socioeconomic status is believed to have greater access to discretionary procedures and thus show healthier behaviours and better mental health [23]. Thus such individuals usually have lower pain catastrophizing than low socioeconomic status.

Severity of pain caused by headache might have influence on risk of suicide attempt associated with migraine. Increased pain severity is found to increase the risk of such suicidal attempts [1]. Notably; pain catastrophizing is linked to exaggerated negative mood and depression. This critical observation purports association of chronic pain with increased tendencies of suicidal ideation and high rates of suicide. We observed that higher pain catastrophizing was associated with presence of active suicidal thought, suicidal ideation and intension with or without any specific plan. Besides pain catastrophizing, common psychological factors identified are helplessness and hopelessness about pain, the desire for escape from pain, problem-solving deficits, magnitude of depressive symptoms, the degree of pain-related catastrophizing and maladaptive cognitive/emotional pain-coping strategies [24,25].

Disability increases twice the likelihood of suicidal thoughts, suicidal ideation and its intensity; particularly in those who experience higher levels of social stress and emotional reliance and lower levels of social support, mastery, and self-esteem [26]. We also observed that higher disability was associated with presence of active suicidal thoughts or ideation with intent and with or without specific plan. Studies reported that endorsing a preference for death over disability was associated with wanting to die because of pain, recent suicidal ideation and having a suicide plan, among other suicide variables [27]. Similarly, pain catastrophizing was significantly associated with such suicidal ideations in our study. Also, disability score was significantly associated with the score of deterrents and controllability subscale of intensity of suicidal ideation. Disability is a risk factor for suicidal ideation for several reasons. First, physical disability represents a source of chronic stress that involves lasting difficulties in managing every-day instrumental and social activities [28]. Secondly, recent research has documented strong relationships between disability and emotional distress, social inadequacy and alienation [29,30]. To the extent that the person with disability view themselves as a constant burden to others, especially close kin, they may see suicide as a solution to this perceived problem [31].

We observed a significant association between pain catastrophization and Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious Behaviour (NSSI). Headache induces distress and intense negative emotion, which may lead to experiential avoidance (to avoid or escape from unwanted internal experiences) that may initiate and maintain NSSI behaviour [32,33]. NSSI allows individuals to express, alleviate, or control intense emotional experiences [34,35]. Other research also indicates that: (a) acute negative affect precedes self-injury; (b) decreased negative affect and relief are present after self-injury; (c) self-injury is most often performed with intent to alleviate negative affect; and (d) negative affect and arousal are reduced by the performance of self-injury proxies in laboratory settings [36]. Research also indicates that self-injury serves as anti-dissociation, interpersonal-influence, sensation-seeking, communal coping and interpersonal boundaries functions [36]. Some theorists have argued that early experience of trauma damages certain neuroanatomical pathways in the brain related to the release of endorphins, which are implicated in the regulation of emotional states. In individuals whose neural pathways are affected in this way, it is suggested that deliberate self-harm may offer a means of releasing endorphins. Others have noted changes in the brain systems utilizing the neurotransmitter serotonin in both suicide and deliberate self-harm.

Limitation

In this study the number of subjects with NSSI were few, hence the implication of this finding is limited.

Conclusion

Our study provides insights into the common problem of headache, where disabling headache and pain catastrophizing may be associated with increased suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour. Recurrent intense headache with pain catastrophizing may lead to intuitive suicidal thoughts that may result in suicidal behaviours and non-suicidal self injurious behaviour. Headaches in female gender, unemployment and low socioeconomic status; all of these factors cautions for association with pain disability and catastrophizing in order to reduce suicidal ideation and behaviour. This finding is supported by WHO recommendation; that Health-care services need to incorporate suicide prevention as a core component. Since, there is a high prevalence of headache in the general population, there is a strong need to look into these issues. However, the finding of this study is applicable to subject availing service from a tertiary care centre, and further study in general population is needed with bigger sample size.

Mann-Whitney U test, *p<0.05 significantMann-Whitney U test, *p<0.05 significantANOVA using Kruskal-Wallis, *p<0.05Mann-Whitney U test, *p<0.05 significant

References

[1]Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P, Migraine, psychiatric disorders, and suicide attempts: an epidemiologic study of young adults Psychiatry Res 1991 37(1):11-23.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S, Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Lancet 2015 386(9995):743-800.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Steiner TJ, Birbeck GL, Jensen RH, Katsarava Z, Stovner LJ, Martelletti P, Headache disorders are third cause of disability worldwide J Headache Pain 2015 16(1):1-3.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Nachit-Ouinekh F, Dartigues JF, Henry P, Becg JP, Chastan G, Lemaire N, Use of the headache impact test (HIT-6) in general practice: Relationship with quality of life and severity Eur J Neurol 2005 12:189-93.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Shin HE, Park JW, Kim YI, Lee KS, Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores for migraine patients: Their relation to disability as measured from a headache diary J Clin Neurol 2008 4:158-63.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Government of India. 2011 census data. Of fice of the General & Census Commission, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, 2013. http://censusindia.gov.in. [Accessed 20 March 2015]  [Google Scholar]

[7]Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton RB, Scher AI, The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide Cephalalgia 2007 27(3):193-210.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Rao GN, Kulkarni GB, Gururaj G, Rajesh K, Subbakrishna DK, Steiner TJ, The burden of headache disorders in India: methodology and questionnaire validation for a community-based survey in Karnataka State J Headache Pain 2012 13(7):543-50.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Bera SC, Khandelwal SK, Sood M, Goyal V, A comparative study of psychiatric comorbidity, quality of life and disability in patients with migraine and tension type headache Neurol India 2014 62:516-20.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Steiner TJ, Lifting the burden: the global campaign against headache Lancet Neurol 2004 3(4):204-05.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Chaves JF, Brown JM, Spontaneous cognitive strategies for the control of clinical pain and stress J Behav Med 1987 10:263-76.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Gauthier N, Thibault P, Adams H, Sullivan MJ, Validation of a French-Canadian Version of the pain disability index Pain Res Manag 2008 13(4):327-33.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Hassett AL, Aquino JK, Ilgen MA, The risk of suicide mortality in chronic pain patients Curr Pain Headache Rep 2014 18(8):1-7.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Gururaj G, Kulkarni GB, Rao GN, Subbakrishna DK, Stovner LJ, Steiner TJ, Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of primary headache disorders: results of a population-based survey from Bangalore, India Indian J Public Health 2014 58:241-48.  [Google Scholar]

[15]National Crime Records Bureau Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India 2004-2013 New DelhiGovernment of India  [Google Scholar]

[16]Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS)The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia 2013 33(9):629-808.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10 J Clin Psychiatry 1998 59(Suppl 20):22-33.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults Am J Psychiatry 2011 168(12):1266-77.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Jacobson GP, Ramadan NM, Aggarwal SK, Newman CW, The Henry Ford hospital headache disability inventory (HDI) Neurology 1994 44(5):837-42.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J, The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation Psychol Assess 1995 7(4):524-32.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Baigi K, Stewart WF, Headache and migraine: a leading cause of absenteeism Clin Neurol 2015 131:447-63.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Sansone RA, Watts DA, Wiederman MW, Pain catastrophizing and employment histories Occup Med (Lond) 2014 64(4):294-96.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Feldman CH, Dong Y, Katz JN, Donnell-Fink LA, Losina E, Association between socioeconomic status and pain, function and pain catastrophizing at presentation for total knee arthroplasty BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015 16(1):1  [Google Scholar]

[24]Tang NK, Crane C, Suicidality in chronic pain: a review of the prevalence, risk factors and psychological links Psychol Med 2006 36(5):575-86.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Edwards RR, Smith MT, Kudel I, Haythornthwaite J, Pain-related catastrophizing as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in chronic pain Pain 2006 126(1–3):272-79.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Russell D, Turner RJ, Joiner TE, Physical disability and suicidal ideation: a community-based study of risk/protective factors for suicidal thoughts Suicide Life Threat Behav 2009 39(4):440-51.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Fishbain DA, Bruns D, Meyer LJ, Lewis JE, Gao J, Disorbio JM, Exploration of the relationship between disability perception, preference for death over disability, and suicidality in patients with acute and chronic pain Pain Med 2012 13:552-61.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Turner RJ, Noh S, Physical disability and depression: a longitudinal analysis J Health Soc Behav 1988 29(1):23-37.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Rokach A, Lechcier-Kimel R, Safarov A, Loneliness of people with physical disabilities Soc Beh Pers : An International Journal 2006 34(6):681-700.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Turner RJ, Lloyd DA, Taylor J, Physical disability and mental health: An epidemiology of psychiatric and substance disorders Rehabil Psycho 2006 51(3):214-23.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Joiner T, Why people die by suicide 2007 Sep 30 Harvard University Press  [Google Scholar]

[32]Chapman AL, Gratz KL, Brown MZ, Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: the experiential avoidance model Behav Res Ther 2006 44(3):371-94.  [Google Scholar]

[33]Haines J, Williams CL, Brain KL, The psychopathology of incarcerated self-mutilators Can J Psychiatry 1995 40(9):514-22.  [Google Scholar]

[34]Favazza AR, Conterio K, Female habitual self-mutilators Acta Psychiatr Scand 1989 79(3):283-89.  [Google Scholar]

[35]Gratz KL, Risk factors for and functions of deliberate self-harm: an empirical and conceptual review Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2003 10(2):192-205.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Klonsky ED, The functions of deliberate self-injury: a review of the evidence Clin Psychol Rev 2007 27(2):226-39.  [Google Scholar]