JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pharmacology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21011.8752
Year : 2016 | Month : Oct | Volume : 10 | Issue : 10 Full Version Page : FF01 - FF05

Evaluation of Effect of Nishamalaki on STZ and HFHF Diet Induced Diabetic Neuropathy in Wistar Rats

Jayshree Shriram Dawane1, Vijaya Anil Pandit2, Madhura Shirish Kumar Bhosale3, Pallawi Shashank Khatavkar4

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, BVDU Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
2 Professor, Department of Pharmacology, BVDU Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
3 Resident, Department of Pharmacology, BVDU Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
4 Resident, Department of Pharmacology, BVDU Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Jayshree Shriram Dawane, Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Katraj, Pune-411046, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: jayshreedawane@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications affecting 50% of diabetic patients. Neuropathic pain is the most difficult types of pain to treat. There is no specific treatment for neuropathy. Nishamalaki (NA), combination of Curcuma longa and Emblica officinalis used to treat Diabetes Mellitus (DM). So, efforts were made to test whether NA is useful in prevention of diabetic neuropathy.

Aim

To evaluate the effect of NA on diabetic neuropathy in type 2 diabetic wistar rats.

Materials and Methods

Group I (Control) vehicle treated consists of 6 rats. Diabetes induced in 36 wistar rats with Streptozotocin (STZ) (35mg/kg) intra-peritoneally followed by High Fat High Fructose diet. After confirmation of development of diabetes; rats divided into six groups (n=6). Group II – VII Diabetic Control, NA low dose, NA High dose, Glibenclamide, Pioglitazone and Epalrestat. Animals received drug treatment for next 12 weeks. Monitoring of Blood Sugar Level (BSL) done every 15 days and lipid profile at the end. Eddy’s hot plate and tail immersion test performed to assess thermal hyperalgesia and cold allodynia. Walking function test performed to assess motor function.

Results

Diabetic rats exhibited significant (p<0.001) hyperalgesia and increased BSL compared to control rats. Dose-dependent improvement was observed in thermal hyperalgesia & cold allodynia in NA groups. Activity of NA was more than Glibenclamide, Epalrestat and Pioglitazone in high dose and comparable in low dose. Nishamalaki improved lipid profile.

Conclusion

Apart from controlling hyperglycaemia and reducing lipid levels, NA effectively prevented the development of diabetic neuropathy.

Keywords

Introduction

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder; alarmingly increase in the incidence observed globally. DM considered as a major threat to human health in developing and developed countries due to its complications. In spite of control of DM, complications may develop over due course of disease. Neuropathy is the most common chronic complication of DM affecting more than 50% of the patients [1]. The duration of disease and level of hyperglycaemia are important determinants of microvascular complications of diabetes [2]. Pain due to diabetic neuropathy affects most often lower extremities above the knees and upper extremities [3]. Abnormal excitement of immaturely regenerated nerve fibers causes spontaneous pain, numbness and paresthesia [4]. Pain occurs even after the exposure to mild pain stimuli i.e., hyperalgesia and allodynia. Diabetic neuropathy shows significant impact on Quality Of Life (QOL) and costs of management [5]. Apart from tight glycaemic control, no other evidence-based treatments are known to prevent neuropathy [6].

The exact pathology of diabetic neuropathy is not known, but it involves oxidative stress, advanced glycation end products, polyol pathway flux activation contribute to microvascular disease and nerve dysfunction [7]. Current treatment based on the use of desipramine, amitriptyline, capsaicin, tramadol, gabapentin, bupropion, and venlafaxine etc., [8]. But these drugs provides only symptomatic relief and has no effect on Blood Sugar Level (BSL) and progression of disease.

Nishamalaki (Na) is an Ayurvedic formulation prepared from Amla (Emblica officinalis) and Turmeric (Curcuma longa) with the traditional method as per the ancient literature [9]. Traditional use mentioned its utility to control DM in initial phase and continued with addition of other agents for maintenance [10,11]. Individual agents in NA show hypoglycaemic, anti-oxidant and neuro-protective effect [12,13]. No studies are available for effect of combined formulation using modern medicinal parameters for neuropathy. Present study was planned to assess the efficacy of NA in diabetic neuropathy.

Materials and Methods

Wistar rats of either sex having average weight of 150-200g were used for the study. Housing was done in accordance with Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) guidelines in standard cages. The animals were given food and water ad libitum and were exposed to12 hours light and dark cycle. Study started after obtaining the approval (IAEC:BVDUMC/88/2014-15) from Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of the Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune (CPCSEA - 258) Maharashtra, India.

Plant material

Dried Curcuma longa rhizomes and fresh fruits of Emblica officinalis were collected from the local market, Pune (Maharashtra). The plant material was authenticated by Ayurvedic College of Bharati Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.

Preparation of Nishamalaki formulation

Amla extract was added to the Curcuma powder in proportion of 6:1. This mixture was triturated till it become fine paste. The mixture was shed dried. Completely dried product was again powdered and stored in clean dry glass container. The final product NA was given to rats in the dose of 0.9g/kg with honey. Doses of NA (0.9gm/kg, p.o.) were selected on the basis of previous literature [14].

Drugs and Chemicals

Streptozotocin (STZ) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich, obtained from Anand agencies, Pune. Chemicals of analytical grade were purchased from local suppliers of Pune.

Induction of Diabetes

STZ was dissolved in ice cold citrate buffer (pH 4.4). Drug solution was prepared fresh. Group I (Control) vehicle consists of 6 rats. Type 2 Diabetes induced in 36 wistar rats with STZ (35mg/kg) intra-peritoneally single injection followed by High Fat High Fructose Diet (HFHF). HFHF consists of Vanaspati Ghee and Coconut oil inproportion of 2:3 and 10% fructose for drinking [15]. After confirmation of development of diabetes; rats were divided into six groups of (n=6).

Groups:

» Gr I: Control –Saline Treated

» Gr II: DM control- Saline Treated

» Gr III: Nishamalaki- Low dose- 0.9gm/kg

» Gr IV: Nishamalaki- High dose- 1.8gm/kg

» Gr V: Glibenclamide- 5mg/kg

» Gr VI: Pioglitazone- 2.7mg/kg

» Gr VII: Epalrestat- 4mg/kg

Animals received drug treatment for next 12 weeks as per the groups. Monitoring of BSL was done on 15 days and lipid profile at the end of the study.

Neuropathy Assessed With

Sensory component: Reaction to thermal stimulation- hyperalgesia is an early symptom of neuropathic pain and diabetic neuropathy pain in experimental animals. Hot-plate method [16].

Animals were individually placed on Eddy’s hot-plate apparatus (LE 7406) that contained a plate with the diameter of 25cm and a plexiglas wall with height of 20cm. The temperature adjusted to 52 ± 1°C. To calculate latency time from putting the animal on the hot-plate to the first sign of paw licking or jump response to avoid the heat was taken as an index of the pain threshold. The cut-off time of 10 seconds was given in order to avoid damage to the paw to all the animals [17].

Tail-immersion (hot water) test [18]

The lower 5cm portion of the tail is marked. Tail of rat was immersed in a hot water bath with temperature 52.5 ± 0.5 °C. Within a few seconds the rat reacts by withdrawing the tail (flicking response) or signs of struggle were observed (cut-off 12 seconds). Shortening of the tail withdrawal time indicates hyperalgesia. After each determination the tail is carefully dried. Rat was gently placed in the cage.

Assessment of Cold allodynia [19]

Cold allodynia was assessed by measuring tail withdrawal latency. Ice cold water (4±10°C) was taken in beaker. The tail of rat was submerged gently in water and the withdrawal time was measured for diabetic neuropathy. A cut-off 20 seconds was maintained throughout the experiment.

Motor Component

Assessed with Walking function test [20]

Walking test was performed on a rod of 6cm diameter and 1 m long for assessment of motor component. Rod was placed horizontally 40cm above a ground. The rod was graduated in order to allow the measurement of the distance covered by the animals. Three trials per session were given. Each trial was of 60 seconds maximum, each rat was placed at one end of the rod and the time taken cover the distance of 1m was recorded. If the animal falls down or is unable to walk the 1m distance, 60 s were credited. For each animal, the mean duration of the three trials was calculated and retained as the characteristic value.

End of the experiment- All the rats were sacrificed and sciatic nerves were carefully removed for antioxidant activity and histopathological study.

Estimation antioxidant parameters

Nerves tissues were incubated separately in culture medium Tc 199 for 48 hours. Tissue homogenized in 0.1M sodium phosphate Buffer in homogenizer. Homogenate was centrifuged for 30 min at 4°c. Supernatant collected and stored at 20°c. Supernatant of homogenates was used to estimate lipid peroxidation (MDA content), Sodium Dismutase (SOD) and catalase levels.

Histopathology of sciatic nerve

The nerve tissues were washed with saline and fixed in 10% formalin. Slides were prepared by embedding the nerve in paraffin and cut into 4μm thickness sections. Slide staining was done with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Nerve sections were analysed under light microscope for axonal degeneration and vascular defects

Statistical Analysis

Results were expressed as mean±SEM. The data were analysed by one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Reaction to thermal stimulation-

Diabetic rats exhibited significant (p<0.001) hyperalgesia compared with control rats in both the tail-immersion and hot-plate method. Drug treatment showed improvement in all drug treated groups. NA administration to diabetic rats produced a dose dependent increase in pain threshold as compared to untreated diabetic rats in both tail-immersion and hot-plate assays [Table/Fig-1]. Epalrestat (p<0.001) was more effective in tail immersion than hot plate method.

Reaction to thermal stimulation.

GroupsHot plate(Reactiontime in sec)Hot waterimmersion test(Reactiontime in sec)Cold waterimmersion(allodynia)test (Reactiontime in sec)
Normal Control8.5±0.7611.16±0.4712.66±0.91
Diabetic Control2.3±0.33$$$3.6±0.33$$$5.00±0.51$$$
NA low dose6.1±0.90*8.1±0.94**$10.66±1.30**
NA High dose7.1±0.60**9.5±0.99***12.33±0.80***
Glibenclamide6.5±0.76*8.0±0.68*$10.33±0.42**
Pioglitazone6.0±0.73*8.1±0 .47**$10.83±0.60**
Epalrestat6.6±0.42*8.8±0.54***10.66±0.66**

Data expressed as Mean± SEM, $$$p<0.001 compared with control and * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 in comparison with diabetic control


Walking function

Significant increase in time taken to travel 1m distance on rod in DM control (p<0.001) was observed. There was decrease time seen in all treated rats compared to DM group rats [Table/Fig-2]. Highest efficacy was seen in NA high dose (p<0.001). Epalerstat (p<0.05), low dose NA (p<0.01) and Glibenclamide (p<0.01) was similar in walking efficacy. Non significant decrease was seen in Pioglitazone group [Table/Fig-3].

Walking function test.

Effect of nishamalaki on walking function test.

Data expressed as Mean± SEM, $$$p<0.001 compared with control and * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 in comparison with diabetic control.

Lipid Profile

Effect of NA on serum cholesterol and serum triglycerides was evaluated. Serum cholesterol levels in diabetic control group shows significant increase (p< 0.001) than normal control [Table/Fig-4]. NA in 0.9gm/kg dose showed significant decrease (p< 0.01) in cholesterol levels. Glibenclamide and Pilglitazone showed less effect then NA (p< 0.05). Epalrestat was very less effective in reducing cholesterol. In case of Serum triglycerides similar pattern was observed in diabetic control group. There was significant reduction in the levels with both the doses of NA (p<0.001) was seen [Table/Fig-5]. Favourable changes in lipid profile were observed with Nishamalaki.

Effect of nishamalaki on levels of total cholesterol.

Data expressed as Mean± SEM, $$$p<0.001 compared with control and * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, in comparison with diabetic control.

Effect on triglyceride levels.

Data expressed as Mean± SEM, $$$p<0.001 compared with control and *** p<0.001 in comparison with Diabetic control.

Sciatic nerve antioxidant activity

Levels of Malondialdehyde (MDA) were increased significantly (p<0.001) in diabetic control group compared to control indicative of oxidative stress [Table/Fig-6]. Decrease in the levels of MDA was seen with NA- HD. There was increase in levels SOD (p<0.001) [Table/Fig-7] and catalase (p<0.001) [Table/Fig-8] in NA group.

Effect of nishamalaki on MDA levels.

Effect of nishamalaki on SOD levels.

Effect of nishamalaki on Catalase levels.

Sciatic nerve histology

The diameter of nerve fibres in cross-section was markedly reduced suggesting the shrinkage of nerve fibres and marked axon atrophy and myelin vacuolization was evident in the cross-sectional view of the sciatic nerve in diabetic control group [Table/Fig-9a-g]. Normal arrangement of fibres and density of myelinated fibres was well maintained in NA group. Few areas of partial loss of fibres were evident in Glibenclamide and Epalrestat treated groups.

Histopathological Findings.

(a)–Control Normal -Fibers are normal and completely arranged. Density of myelinated fiber is well maintained.

(b)– DM Control - Loss of both large and small myelinated fibers.

(c)–Nishamalaki low dose-Partial loss of myelination large and smallfibers.

(d)–Nishamalaki high dose- Myelinated fibre density well preserved and are compactly arranged. Some regenerating clusters are seen.

(e)–Glibenclamide - The fibers are compactly arranged and partial loss of myelinated fibers in some areas.

(f)–Pioglitazone-The fibers are compactly arranged and myelinated fibers is well preserved.

(g)–Epalrestat-Partial loss of myelinated fibers in some areas.

Discussion

Diabetic polyneuropathy represents a diffuse symmetric and length-dependent injury to peripheral nerves [21]. It affects Quality of life, increases morbidity and cost treatment [22]. In DN- structural and functional aberration of peripheral neurons, spinal glial cells and nerve [23]. The hyperalgesic response on the hot-plate is considered to result from a combination of central and peripheral mechanisms [24]. Allodynia is hallmark of neuropathic pain and diabetic neuropathy pain in experimental animals [25].

Various mechanisms for toxicity on peripheral nerve fibres have been proposed like high blood glucose, advanced glycation end products, sorbitol and abnormal blood fat levels and oxidative stress are considered to be important. According to unifying mechanism proposed by Brownlee – oxidative stress is the first important step leading to cellular changes discovered so far are- Increased flux through polyol pathway, production of advanced glycation end products Protein kinase activation and Increased hexosamine pathway activity which are leading to nerve damage [26].

Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments are used to reduce pain and improve physical function and improve QOL in patients with neuropathy. Many of them are associated with serious side effects.

In present study, NA appeared as a most effective drug. It has improved sensory and motor component. Glibenclamide is a commonly used sufonylurea, longer acting therefore, once daily administered for control of blood sugar level. Glibenclamide used as standard drug in the present study, which act by reducing blood sugar through increasing insulin release and also by improving peripheral utilization of glucose [27]. Pioglitazoneact by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARγ) activation, increases glucose transport into tissue, reduces hepatic gluconeogenesis and improve utilization of glucose [28]. Epalrestat reduces aldose reductase inhibitor, helps to reduce the sorbitol levels used in diabetic neuropathy [29]. It was found to be most effective in subjects with good glycaemic control and well tolerated [30]. Hypoglycaemia with glybenclamide and weight gain, oedema, precipitation of CCF, hepatotoxicity with Pioglitazone are the common adverse effects encountered.

More effectiveness of NA indicates that it works by combined/additional mechanisms. Curcuma and Amla both individually reduce lipid perioxidation and have anti-oxidant activity [31]. NA has reduced MDA activity which has prevented lipid peroxidation and development of oxidative stress. Also, increase in the SOD and catalase levels, which have reduced superoxide radical production because of synergistic effect of combination. Therefore, reduction in oxidative stress and anti-oxidant action of NA was significantly more than any other agent. More importantly, anti-oxidant effect was seen inside the neuronal tissue indicating good penetration of NA inside the nerves. NA may have acted through multiple mechanism and showed protective effect. Additionally, it has also reduced the cholesterol and triglyceride levels. It was observed that NA in Low Dose and High Dose (LD and HD) has equivalent anti-oxidant action-indicating that increasing the dose of NA has limited advantage.

Limitation

Only anti-oxidant mechanism was studied. Further studies are required to strengthen the utlity of NA for prevention of neuropathy.

Conclusion

NA is effective in improving sensory and motor component of diabetic neuropathy. Apart from other actions, anti-oxidant action appears to be most important mechanism of action of NA. NA appears to be a potential drug formulation for preventing diabetic neuropathy.

References

[1]Jain D, Bansal MK, Dalvi R, Upganlawar A, Somani R, Protective effect of diosmin against diabetic neuropathy in experimental rats Journal of Integrative Medicine 2014 12(1):35-41.  [Google Scholar]

[2]The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research GroupThe effect of intensive diabetes therapy on the development and progression of neuropathy Ann Intern Med 1995 122:561-68.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Backonja M, Beydoun A, Edwards KR, Schwartz SL, Fonseca V, Hes M, Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial Jama 1998 280(21):1831-36.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Hotta N, Toyota T, Matsuoka K, Shigeta Y, Kikkawa R, Kaneko T, The SNK-860 diabetic neuropathy study group. Clinical efficacy of fidarestat, a novel aldose reductase inhibitor, for diabetic peripheral neuropathy Diabetes Care 2001 24(10):1776-82.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Veves A, Backonja M, Malik RA, Painful diabetic neuropathy: epidemiology, natural history, early diagnosis, and treatment options Pain Medicine 2008 9(6):660-74.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Tesfaye S, Chaturvedi N, Eaton SE, Ward JD, Manes C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Vascular risk factors and diabetic neuropathy New England Journal of Medicine 2005 352(4):341-50.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Max MB, Lynch SA, Muir J, Shoaf SE, Smoller B, Dubner R, Effects of desipramine, amitriptyline, and fluoxetine on pain in diabetic neuropathy New England Journal of Medicine 1992 326(19):1250-56.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Hovaguimian A, Gibbons CH, Clinical approach to the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism 2011 2(1):27-38.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Charak Samhita/ chikitsa sthan / Prameha Chikitsa Adhyaya, 6/289  [Google Scholar]

[10]Astanga hridhya/ chikitsa sthan /Dwadosh Adhyaya/ Prameha ChikitsaVakhayam /5  [Google Scholar]

[11]Yadav RK, Mishra R, Chhipa RP, Audichya KC, Clinical trial of an indgenous compound drug nishaamalki in the management of madhumeha vis-à-vis diabetes mellitus Ancient Science of Life 2001 21(1):18  [Google Scholar]

[12]Rao G, Bhat S, Rao GS, Bhat GP, Antidiabetic and antioxidant efficacy of a powdered mixture of curcuma longa and Emblica officinalis In Diabetic Rats In Comparison with glyburide http://www.webmedcentral.com on 25-Feb-2013  [Google Scholar]

[13]Bala K, Tripathy BC, Sharma D, Neuroprotective and anti-ageing effects of curcumin in aged rat brain regions Biogerontology 2006 7:81-89.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Dawane J, Pandit VA, Deshpande SS, Kuvalekar AA, Mandpe A, Wele A, Evaluation of anti-diabetic activity of Nishamlaki on streptozotocin induced type II diabetic rats International Journal of Phytomedicine 2015 6(4):595-600.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Shyamala MP, Venukumar MR, Latha MS, Antioxidant potential of the Syzygium aromaticum (Gaertn.) Linn.(Cloves) in rats fed with high fat diet Indian Journal of pharmacology 2003 35(2):99-103.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Vogel HG, Drug discovery and evaluation pharmacological assays 2002 2nd edNew YorkSpringer-Verlager Berlin Heidelberg:696-97.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Niture NT, Patil DG, Somani RS, Sahane RS, Effect of rutin on early diabetic neuropathy in experimental animals Journal of Nat Prod Plant Resour 2014 4(4):1-9.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Ramabadran K, Bansinath M, Turndorf H, Puig MM, Tail immersion test for the evaluation of a nociceptive reaction in mice: Methodological considerations Journal of Pharmacological Methods 1989 21(1):21-31.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Aswar MK, Patil VR, A systematic review on neuropathy Int J Drug Dev & Res 2016 8:029-034.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Jain D, Bansal MK, Dalvi R, Upganlawar A, Somani R, Protective effect of diosmin against diabetic neuropathy in experimental rats Journal of Integrative Medicine 2014 12(1):35-41.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Ahmed A, Bril V, Orszag A, Paulson J, Yeung E, Ngo M, Detection of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy by corneal confocal microscopy in type 1 diabetes a concurrent validity study Diabetes Care 2012 35(4):821-28.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Jensen MP, Chodroff MJ, Dworkin RH, The impact of neuropathic pain on health-related quality of life Review and implications Neurology 2007 68(15):1178-82.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Javed S, Petropoulos IN, Alam U, Malik RA, Treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2015 6(1):15-28.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Anjaneyulu M, Chopra K, Quercetin attenuates thermal hyperalgesia and cold allodynia in STZ-induced diabetic rats Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 42(8):766-69.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Shaikh AS, Somani RS, Animal models and biomarkers of neuropathy in diabetic rodents Indian J Pharmacol 2010 42(3):129-34.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Brownlee M, Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications Nature 2001 414(6865):813-20.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Müller G, Hartz D, Pünter J, Ökonomopulos R, Kramer W, Differential interaction of glimepiride and glibenclamide with the β-cell sulfonylurea receptor I. Binding characteristics Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 1994 1191(2):267-77.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Kota BP, Huang TH, Roufogalis BD, An overview on biological mechanisms of PPARs Pharmacological Research 2005 51(2):85-94.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Ramirez MA, Borja NL, Epalrestat: an aldose reductase inhibitor for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy Pharmacotherapy 2008 28(5):646-55.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Sharma SR, Sharma N, Epalrestat, an aldose reductase inhibitor, in diabetic neuropathy: An Indian perspective Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2008 11(4):231-35.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Suryanarayana P, Satyanarayana A, Balakrishna N, Kumar PU, Reddy GB, Effect of turmeric and curcumin on oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat Medical Science Monitor 2007 13(12):BR286-92.  [Google Scholar]