Microbiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21621.8546
Year : 2016 | Month : Sep | Volume : 10 | Issue : 09 Page : DC23 - DC27

Diversity of Vaginal Lactic Acid Bacterial Microbiota in 15 Algerian Pregnant Women with and without Bacterial Vaginosis by using Culture Independent Method

Souad Alioua1, Akila Abdi2, Imène Fhoula3, Françoise Bringel4, Abdelatif Boudabous5, Imene Hadda Ouzari6

1 PhD Candidate, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Applied Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria.
2 Assistant Professor, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Applied Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria.
3 PhD, Laboratory of Micro-organisms and Active Biomolecules LR03ES03, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of TunisEl Manar, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia.
4 Professor, Department of Microbiology, Genomics and the Environment, Université de StrasbourgUMR 7156 UNISTRA CNRS, France.
5 Professor, Laboratory of Micro-organisms and Active Biomolecules LR03ES03, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of TunisEl Manar, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia.
6 Professor, Laboratory of Micro-organisms and Active Biomolecules LR03ES03, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of TunisEl Manar, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia.

NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Souad Alioua, PhD Candidate, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Applied Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University Badji Mokhtar, Sidi Ammar street, Annaba, 23000, Algeria.
E-mail: souadalioua@yahoo.fr


Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) is the most common lower genital tract disorder among women of reproductive age (pregnant and non-pregnant) and a better knowledge of Lactobacillus species richness in healthy and infected vaginal microbiota is needed to efficiently design better probiotic products to promote the maintenance of normal flora which will help prevent bacterial vaginosis.


To evaluate and compare the diversity of lactic acid bacterial species in pregnant women with and without BV.

Materials and Methods

A pilot study was carried out during November-2014 to March-2015 in University Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria. Vaginal swabs were collected from 15 pregnant women aged between 19 and 35 years (mean 27.6 years; n=15) living in the East of Algeria visiting Gynecology service, hospital Abdallah Nouaouria- El bouni, Annaba. Vaginal samples were gram-stained, and scored by the Nugent method. The cohort included cases of women with healthy “normal” vaginal flora, infected flora with bacterial vaginosis and women with “intermediate” flora. The vaginal LAB community from pregnant women was identified by culture independent method based on Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE), with the 16S rRNA gene sequencing.


A majority of LAB affiliated to the genus Lactobacillus was found in “normal” and “intermediate” flora (87.5% and 43.75% respectively), while a majority of LAB affiliated to the genus Enterococcus was identified in women with bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora (60% and 46.75% respectively).

Our results showed that the presence of Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus delbruekii promotes stability of the vaginal microbiota.


This result confirms the findings of previous studies suggesting that the occurrence of predominant Lactobacillus negatively correlates with bacterial vaginosis incidence and their current use as probiotics. Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus delbruekii can be defined as critical for defense of the vagina. In addition, Enterococcus feacalis can be considered as an indicator of imbalance of the vaginal ecosystem.


The female vagina is a complex habitat for micro-organisms. Lactobacilli are the most dominant bacteria inhabiting this environment, as they play a major role in the maintenance of a healthy urogenital tract [1].

The microbial ecosystem in healthy “normal” vagina can be disrupted by drugs or by local devices with the concomitant decrease of the Lactobacilli community and overgrowth of anaerobic and facultative aerobic bacteria and yeasts [2].

Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) is one of the most common vaginal syndromes affecting women (pregnant or non- pregnant) in their reproductive age. It has been associated with a significant number of obstetric and gynaecologic complications.

Pregnant women with BV are more likely to have a preterm labour and delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, post- caesarean delivery wound infections, spontaneous abortion, chorioamnionitis, postpartum endometritis and subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease [3,4]. The mainstay treatment of BV consisted of metronidazole, clindamycin or tinidazole [5].

Many studies have considered probiotics as an adjunct to antimicrobial treatment [68]. Others proposed the use of probiotics in preventing the recurrence of BV after an initial treatment [8,9]. In addition, the prophylactic use of probiotics in healthy women with a history of recurrent BV has been confirmed [10].

Culture independent methods based on 16S rRNA-encoding gene sequence community profiling have been used previously to overcome culture-dependent limitations [11] and offer the potential to be rapid and reliable for characterizing the vaginal flora in clinical studies [12].

Our purpose was to assess a potential correlation between the taxonomy of the Lactic Acid Bacterial (LAB) species colonizing the vagina and a balanced healthy vaginal flora by comparing the vaginal LAB taxa found in healthy women and women with bacterial vaginosis by using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) targeting universal and LAB specific 16S rRNA primer sets in conjunction with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE).

To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the vaginal lactic acid bacteria in Algerian pregnant women using this approach.

Materials and Methods

Swab Sampling, Nugent Score and pH Measurement

Vaginal samples from fifteen women were collected. Three swabs were collected from each subject after insertion of an un-lubricated speculum into the posterior fornix of the vaginal tract. Women were pregnant at various months of pregnancy and under no antimicrobial or prescribed therapy, aged between 19 and 35 years (mean 27.6 years; n=15). Swabs were vigorously agitated in 1mL sterile distilled water. One drop was deposited on microscope slide smears, Gram-stained, and scored by the Nugent method [13]. Nugent results were graded as 0–3 (Normal vaginal state; N), 4–6 (Intermediate-grade bacterial colonization; I), and 7–10 (Bacterial vaginosis; BV). The pH was determined using a pH indicator paper (Merck).

DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Microbial cell suspensions from vaginal swabs were pelleted by centrifugation (10,000 g, 5 min) previous to DNA extraction using ABIO pure Genomic DNA blood/cell culture (Alliance Bio Laborato-ries) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was quantified using the NanoDrop microvolume sample retention system (Thermo Scientific NanoDrop Products). PCR reactions were carried out in a thermocycler (Thermal Cycler; Biometra) using the universal primers of bacteria 357F (5’-119 TACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3’) and 907R (5’-CCGTCAATTCMTTTGAGTTT-3’) as described by Muyzer [14] and the specific lactic acid bacteria primers Lac1 (5’-AGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCA-3’), Lac2 (5’-ATTYCACCGCTACACATG-3’) and Lac3 (5’-AGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCGG-3’). A 44-bp GC-rich clamp sequence was added to the 5’ ends of primers 357FGC and Lac 2GC [15,16].

The PCR reaction was obtained by mixing 0.6 μL of each primer (25 mM), 10 μL buffer 5X with 20 mM MgCl2, 0.5 μL dNTPs (25 mM), 1 U/ μL of Taq polymerase (Thermo Scientific), 1μL of the genomic DNA, and ultrapure water (Millipore) to a final volume of 50μL. Amplified DNA was analysed after electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel followed by staining with ethidium bromide (5μg/ml) using Gel Compare (Version 4.1, Applied Maths, Kortrijk Belgium).

Taxa Identification using DGGE and 16S RNA Sequencing

PCR products generated with primers set N°1, 2 and 3 [Table/Fig-1] were separated by DGGE according to the specifications of Muyzer [15] with the following modifications: The concentrations of polyacrylamide, denaturant (7M urea, 40% formamide) and Tris-acetate buffer were 8%, 35–45% and, 50X respectively. A 20 μL of amplified PCR products mixed with 2X loading buffer were deposited into each well. Gel was run for 16 hour at 100V in TAE 1X buffer at 60°C in INGENYphorU system.

PCR conditions prior to DGGE community profiling.

Cycle stagePrimer set N°1907R-357F GCPrimer set N°2Lac1-Lac2 GCPrimer set N°3Lac3-Lac2 GC
Initial denaturation94°C; 3 min94°C; 2 min94°C; 2 min
Cycles of denaturation10 cycles; 61°C; 1min25 cycles; 56°C; 1min35 cycles; 51°C; 1min35 cycles; 61°C; 1min
Elongation72°C; 1min72°C;1 min72°C; 1min
Final extension72°C; 7 min72°C; 7 min72°C; 7 min

After electrophoresis, the gel was stained for 20 minutes in 5 μg/mL of ethidium bromide, washed with deionized water. Under UV light, DNA bands were cut from the gel, and placed in sterile 50 μL distillated sterile water overnight at 4°C.

A 5 μL of the solution containing fragments from the previously excised bands was used as template for PCR re-amplification as described above for DGGE except that primer sets lacking the GC clamps were used. The resulting PCR products were subsequently sequenced using the BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit V3.1 (Applied Biosystems) and an Applied Biosystems 3130 Capillary DNA Sequencer. Analysis of the partial 16S rRNA sequences was conducted using the GenBank DNA database NCBI and the BLAST algorithm [17].

Results of PCR and DGGE fragments in samples from women with Nugent ratings of N, I, or BV were presented as mean±SD.


Nugent Score and pH Measurement of Vaginal Swabs

Among 15 pregnant women tested Nugent ratings for intermediate flora (8 cases), bacterial vaginosis (4 cases) and healthy flora (3 cases). Among the vaginal swabs of women with intermediate Nugent ratings, the pH was comprised between 4 and 5, while the pH of swabs of women with normal flora and bacterial vaginosis were of pH 4 and pH 5, respectively [Table/Fig-2].

Phenotypic characteristics of the vaginal flora of 15 pregnant women.

SubjectAge (years)Nugent scoreNugent ratingVaginal pH
W01246Intermediate flora4
W02263Normal flora4
W04215Intermediate flora5
W05357Bacterial vaginosis5
W06253Normal flora4
W09264Intermediate flora4
W11336Intermediate flora5
W12258Bacterial vaginosis5
W13273Normal flora4
W14224Intermediate flora5
W15195Intermediate flora4
W16326Intermediate flora5
W17275Intermediate flora4
W18247Bacterial vaginosis5
W19347Bacterial vaginosis5

The phenotypical characterization was carried out by determining the pH and the Nugent score for each swab.

Taxonomical Identification of Vaginal Swabs

DGGE analysis of PCR products using Lactobacillus-specific primers and universal primers showed that samples typically yielded 2.4 ± 0.95 dominant fragments per sample. It was possible to identify 12 bacterial species.

In women with Nugent scores rated normal flora, 2.66 ± 0.94 dominant DNA fragments were observed, and those fragments, when sequenced, were homologous to Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus delbrukii and Streptococcus agalatiae.

In women with Nugent scores rated intermediate flora, 2.12 ± 0.92 dominant DNA fragments were observed, and those fragments, when sequenced, were homologous to Aerococcus urinae, Enterococcus feacalis, Enterococcus hirae, Enterococcus spp., Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillusjensenii, Lactobacillus johnsonii, Lactobacillus crispatus, and Streptococcus anginosus with predominance of Enterococcusfeacalis (33.25%).

In women with Nugent scores rated bacterial vaginosis, 2.75 ± 0.82 dominant DNA fragments were observed, and those fragments, when sequenced, were homologous to Enterococcusfeacalis,Enterococcus feacium, Enterococcus hirae, Lactobacillusacidophilus, uncultured Lactobacillus spp. and Streptococcus anginosus, with predominance of Enterococcus feacalis (40%).

The homology between the sequence obtained from the DGGE bands and the closest species from the database are given in [Table/Fig-3].

(Suite): 16S rRNA sequence BLAST analysis corresponding to DGGE gel excised fragments.

SubjectsNugent ratingDGGE fragments†Primer setBand numberMost closely related bacterial sequenceGenBank accession no.Identity, %
W01I3Lac3-Lac212Enterococcus faecalisJUNL0100032398%
Lac3-Lac213Enterococcus hiraeASVZ0100000397%
Lac1-Lac239Lactobacillus crispatusAY33550099%
W02N2Lac1-Lac238Lactobacillus inersKU72666799%
357F-907R48Lactobacillus inersADHG0100000399%
W04I2Lac3-Lac211Aerococcus urinaeNC_01527898%
Lac1-Lac235Lactobacillus inersADHG0100000398%
W05BV4Lac3-Lac222Streptococcus anginosusAZMF0100001097%
Lac3-Lac223Enterococcus faecalisKX07379699%
Lac3-Lac225Enterococcus faecalisJUNL0100032399%
357F-907R44Uncultured Lactobacillus spp.KM25038899%
W06N2357F-907R45Lactobacillus inersADHG0100000399%
Lac3-Lac210Streptococcus anginosusAZMF0100001097%
W09I1Lac3-Lac220Enterococcus faecalisJUNL0100032399%
W11I2Lac1-Lac232Lactobacillus acidophilusAYUA0100012198%
Lac3-Lac219Enterococcus faecalisKR13754199%
W12BV2357F-907R53Lactobacillus crispatusKU99181999%
Lac3-Lac29Streptococcus spp.JMBI0100004696%
W13N4Lac1-Lac229Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckiiBALP0100012597%
Lac1-Lac230Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.delbrueckiiBALP0100012599%
Lac1-Lac231Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricusNC_01472799%
Lac3-Lac218Streptococcus agalactiaeJMBI0100004698%
W14I2Lac1-Lac228Lactobacillus jenseniiGG70469097%
Lac3-Lac27Enterococcus spp.KB02938180%
W15I4Lac3-Lac28Enterococcus faecalisKX07378999%
Lac1-Lac226Lactobacillus inersADHG01000003100%
Lac1-Lac227Lactobacillus inersKU726667100%
Lac3-Lac25Streptococcus anginosusKU72668399%
W16I1Lac3-Lac217Enterococcus faecalisJUNL0100032399%
W17I2357F-907R55Lactobacillus johnsoniiKU99181899%
Lac3-Lac214Enterococcus spp.KX07981799%
W18BV3Lac3-Lac215Enterococcus faeciumKB94673798%
Lac3-Lac216Enterococcus faecalisJUNL0100032399%
Lac3-Lac21Enterococcus faecalisKK64048499%
W19BV2Lac3-Lac22Enterococcus hiraeASVZ0100000397%
Lac3-Lac23Uncultured Lactobacillus spp.KM25038899%

BV, bacterial vaginosis; I, Intermediate grade bacterial colonization; N, normal flora; DGGE, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

† Approximate number of dominant fragments observed.

Several species of Lactobacillus were detected: Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus delbrueckii in the case of normal flora, Lactobacillus jensenii, Lactobacillus johnsonii, Lactobacilluscrispatus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus iners in the case of intermediate flora and Lactobacillusacidophilus, uncultured Lactobacillus spp. in the case of bacterial vaginosis [Table/Fig-4].

Occurrence of Gram positive bacteria in the vagina of Algerian pregnant women.

The vaginal bacterial flora was classified according to the Nugent scores. Two levels of taxonomical classification are shown: at the level of the genus and of the species.

It was observed that the loss in detection of a Lactobacillus species by DGGE and sequencing analysis correlated with a higher Nugent score [Table/Fig-4]. In addition, all the women samples were colonized by a single species (or group of closely related strains) of Lactobacillus.

Our data suggest the absence of Enterococcus species in women belonging to normal flora, in contrast with others women belonging to intermediate flora or to bacterial vaginosis which are predominated by Enterococcus feacalis. So, this species can be considered as an indicator of imbalance of the vaginal ecosystem.


The maintenance of a low pH in the vagina through the microbial production of lactic acid is known to be an important defense against infectious disease in reproductive age women [18]. In our study, all communities (women with normal flora, intermediate flora or bacterial vaginosis) contained members that have been assigned to genera known to produce lactic acid (including Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Aerococcus and Enterococcus), but the correlation between this bacteria and the maintenance of a low pH has not been well defined.

Communities belonging to normal flora have the lowest median pH (4.0), whereas communities belonging to bacterial vaginosis have the highest median pH (5.0). Clearly, the acidification of vaginal ecosystem is negatively correlated with the incidence of bacterial vaginosis among women. These results are in agreement with those of Zhou et al., [19].

The findings of our study indicate that the structure of vaginal lactic acid bacteria varied between the three categories. The vaginal flora of each women were colonized by a single species of Lactobacillus, which is consistent with the findings of other studies [11,20,21].

In particular, L. delbrueckii detection in vaginal swabs of healthy women has been previously recorded but as a minor vaginal bacterial species [22] and not as a major flora as observed here (W13). We observed that vaginal swabs of healthy pregnant women were mostly colonized by L. iners (W02 and W06). The occurrence of L. iners as a member of vaginal communities in healthy women has also been demonstrated by others [19,2326]. First described in 1999 [27], L. iners does not grow on Man Rogosa and Sharpe media (MRS agar). [14,19] which highlights the usefulness of culture-independent approaches for vaginal flora inventory.

Lactobacillus jensenii, Lactobacillus johnsonii, Lactobacilluscrispatus and Lactobacillus acidophilus were recovered from Algerian pregnant women with intermediate flora, in contrast with other studies that have frequently identified these species in vagina of women with normal flora [3,18,25,2831].

Women belonging to intermediate flora were also characterized by a predominance of Enterococcus feacalis. In addition, Enterococcus hirae, Aerococcus urinae and Streptococcus anginosus have been identified in this category of women. These results are in correlation with other studies which confirmed the vaginal colonization of these women (intermediate flora) by aerobic enteric commensals [32,33].

In contrast with a general opinion that species of Lactobacillusacidophilus constitute most of the healthy vaginal Lactobacillus flora [25,28], our results recovered the absence of this species in a healthy women and its presence in 6.25 % of women with intermediate flora. These results suggests that this species is not indicative of a normal microflora, but may point to some intermediate condition.

According to research in PubMed, our study is the first to describe the diversity of lactic acid bacteria associated to bacterial vaginosis in contrast with the entire previous studies which describe only the pathogenic bacteria [3436], or describe only Lactobacillus species associated to this category (women with Bacterial vaginosis) [37,38]. In addition, as per our knowledge our study is the first to describe the vaginal flora of Algerian women using culture independent method.

Our results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort preferably using a study design combined with data on subjects’ behaviors to avoid the limitations of the present study and properly reflect the diversity of vaginal flora in female population of Algeria.


Our data suggest that a predominance of Lactobacillus in the vaginal bacterial flora is negatively correlated with the incidence of bacterial vaginosis in 15 pregnant women of Algeria. In addition, Enterococcus genus is negatively correlated with the incidence of normal Nugent rating among the tested women. According to our results, L. iners and L. delbruekii can be considered as critical for defense of the vagina. In addition, Enterococcus feacalis can be defined as an indicator of the imbalance of vaginal ecosystem.

Compared to culture-dependent methods, PCR- DGGE technique able a better estimation of species composition of the vaginal community, which is a prerequisite for clinical studies of the vaginal tract. Future development of effective probiotics must take into account the results of this study which gives an idea on the specificity of the vaginal lactic acid bacterial flora of Algerian woman where local perineal hygiene is different from the western world.


[1]Ehrstrom S, Daroczy K, Rylander E, Samuelsson C, Johannesson U, Anzen B, Lactic acid bacteria colonization and clinical outcome after probiotic supplementation in conventionally treated bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis Microb and Infect 2010 12:691-99.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Schwebke JR, Abnormal vaginal flora as a biological risk factor for acquisition of HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases J Infect Dis 2005 192:1315-17.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Lamont RF, Sobel JD, Akins RA, Hassan SS, Chaiworapongsa T, Kusanovic JP, The vaginal microbiome: New information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques BJOG 2011 118(5):533-49.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Amortegui AA, Heine RP, Landers DV, Lower genital tract infection and endometritis: Insight in to subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease Obstet Gynecol 2002 100:456-63.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Menard JP, Antibacterial treatment of bacterial vaginosis: current and emerging therapies International Journal of Women’s Health 2011 3:295-305.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Martinez RC, Franceschini SA, Patta MC, Improved cure of bacterial vaginosis with single dose of tinidazole (2 g), Lactobacillusrhamnosus GR-1, and Lactobacillusreuteri RC-14: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Can J Microbiol 2009 55:133-38.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Marcone V, Calzolari E, Bertini M, Effectiveness of vaginal administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus following conventional metronidazole therapy: how to lower the rate of bacterial vaginosis recurrences New Microbiol 2008 31:429-33.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Larsson PG, Stray-Pedersen B, Ryttig KR, Larsen S, Human lactobacilli as supplementation of clindamycin to patients with bacterial vaginosis reduce the recurrence rate; a 6-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study BMC Womens Health 2008 8:3  [Google Scholar]

[9]Marcone V, Rocca G, Lichtner M, Calzolari E, Long-term vaginal administration of Lactobacillusrhamnosus as a complementary approach to management of bacterial vaginosis Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010 110:223-26.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Ya W, Reifer C, Miller LE, Efficacy of vaginal probiotic capsules for recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 203(120):e1-e6.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Vaz-Moreira I, Egas C, Nunes OC, Manaia CM, Culture-dependent and culture-independent diversity surveys target different bacteria: a case study in a freshwater sample Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2011 100(2):245-57.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Ling Z, Kong J, Liu F, Zhu H, Chen X, Wang Y, Molecular analysis of the diversity of vaginal microbiota associated with bacterial vaginosis BMC Genomics 2010 11:448  [Google Scholar]

[13]Chaijareenont K, Sirimai K, Boriboonhirunsarn B, Kiriwat O, Accuracy of Nugent’s score and each Amsel’s criteria in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis J Med Assoc Thai 2004 87:1270-74.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Muyzer G, DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems Curr Opin Microbiol 1999 2:317-22.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Muyzer G, Teske A, Wirsen CO, Jannasch HW, Phylogenetic relationships of Thiomicrospira species and their identification in deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments Arch Microbiol 1995 164:165-72.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Walter J, Hertel C, Tannock GW, Lis CM, Munro K, Hammes WP, Detection of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, and Weissella species in human feces by using group-specific PCR primers and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis Appl Environ Microbiol 2001 67:2578-85.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Endo A, Okada S, Monitoring the lactic acid bacterial diversity during shochu fermentation by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis J Biosci Bioeng 2005 99:216-21.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Clarridge JE, Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases Clin Microbiol Rev 2004 17:840-62.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Zhou X, Brown CJ, Abdo Z, Davis CC, Hansmann MA, Joyce P, Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy Caucasian and black women International Society for Microbial Ecology 2007 1:121-33.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Zhou X, Bent SJ, Schneider MG, Davis CC, Islam MR, Forney LJ, Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods Microbiology 2004 150:2565-73.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Vitali B, Pugliese C, Biagi E, Candela M, Turroni S, Bellen G, Dynamics of vaginal bacterial communities in women developing bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis, or no infection, analysed by PCR-Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and real-time PCR Appl Environ Microbiol 2007 73:5731-41.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Vasquez A, Jakobsson T, Ahrne S, Forsum U, Molin G, Vaginal Lactobacillus flora of healthy Swedish women J Clin Microbiol 2002 40:2746-49.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Ocaña VS, Bru E, Holgado AAPR, Nader-Macias ME, Surface characteristics of lactobacilli isolated from human vagina The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 1999 45:203-12.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Burton JP, Reid G, Evaluation of the bacterial vaginal flora of 20 postmenopausal women by direct (nugent score) and molecular (polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) techniques J Infect Dis 2002 186:1770-80.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Burton JP, Cadieux PA, Reid G, Improved understanding of the bacterial vaginal microbiota of women before and after probiotic instillation Appl Environ Microbiol 2003 69:97-101.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Anukam KC, Osazuwa EO, Ahonkhai I, Reid G, Lactobacillus vaginal microbiota of women attending a reproductive health care service in Benin city, Nigeria Sex Transm Dis 2006 33:59-62.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Falsen E, Pascual C, Sjoden B, Ohlen M, Collins MD, Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of a novel Lactobacillus species from human is: description of Lactobacillus iners sp nov Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999 49:217-21.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Yi Xu H, Tian WH, Wan CX, Jia LJ, Wang LY, Yuan J, Antagonistic potential against pathogenic microorganisms and hydrogen peroxide production of indigenous lactobacilli isolated from vagina of Chinese pregnant women Biomed Environ Sci 2008 21:365-71.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Pavlova SI, Kilic AO, Kilic SS, So JS, Nader-Macias ME, Simoes JA, Genetic diversity of vaginal lactobacilli from women in different countries based on 16S rRNA gene sequences J Appl Microbiol 2002 92(3)  [Google Scholar]

[30]Yamamoto T, Zhou X, Williams CJ, Hochwalt A, Forney LJ, Bacterial populations in the vaginas of healthy adolescent women J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2009 22(1):11-18.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Shi Y, Chen L, Tong J, Xu C, Preliminary characterization of vaginal microbiota in healthy Chinese women using cultivation-independent methods J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009 35(3):525-32.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Donders GGG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B, Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: aerobic vaginitis An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002 109:34-43.  [Google Scholar]

[33]Donders GGG, Bellen G, Rezeberga D, Aerobic vaginitis in pregnancy Inter J Obstet Gynecol 2011 118:1163-70.  [Google Scholar]

[34]Klebanoff MA, Schwebke JR, Zhang J, Nansel TR, Yu KF, Andrews WW, Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis Obstet Gynecol 2004 104:267-72.  [Google Scholar]

[35]Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM, Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis Nw Engl J Med 2005 353:1899-911.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Thomas KK, Oakley BB, Marrazzo JM, Targeted PCR for detection of vaginal bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis J Clin Microbiol 2007 45:3270-76.  [Google Scholar]

[37]Abdelmaksoud AA, Koparde VN, Sheth NU, Serrano MG, Glascock AL, Fettweis JM, Comparison of Lactobacilluscrispatus isolates from Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiomes with isolates from microbiomes containing bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria Microbiology 2016 162(3):466-75.  [Google Scholar]

[38]Pendharkar S, Magopane T, Larsson PG, Bruyn GD, Gray GE, Hammarström L, Identification and characterisation of vaginal lactobacilli from South African women BMC Infectious Diseases 2013 13:43  [Google Scholar]