JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Surgery Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20839.8448
Year : 2016 | Month : Sep | Volume : 10 | Issue : 09 Full Version Page : PD06 - PD07

Incidental Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) in the Donor of a Live Donor Liver Transplant: Tackle and Proceed

Dinesh Zirpe1, CS Muthukumaran2, Anil Vaidya3, Anand Ramamurthy4

1 Senior Registrar, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Centre for Liver, Pancreas and Small Bowel Transplantation, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
2 Senior Consultant, Department of Cardiology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
3 Senior Consultant, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Centre For Liver, Pancreas and Small Bowel Transplantation, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
4 Senior Consultant, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Centre For Liver, Pancreas and Small Bowel Transplantation, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Dinesh Zirpe, Centre For Liver, Pancreas And Small Bowel Transplantation, Apollo Hospitals (Main), Greams Lane, Off Greams Road, Chennai, Tamilnadu-600006, India.
E-mail: drdkzirpe@gmail.com
Abstract

Live Donor Liver Transplantation (LDLT) is an act of selflessness on the part of the donor who is subjected to a major hepatectomy. Ensuring safety and long-term well being of the donor is of utmost priority. We describe a 21-year-old otherwise healthy donor with perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) who successfully underwent donor hepatectomy after closure of the VSD. There is no literature available to guide regarding course of action in such a condition neither any study to substantiate the risk involved. Optimum anticoagulation, endocarditis prophylaxis and optimum interval between the two procedures are areas to be defined as our experience with similar cases increases. Our case emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary approach and management of such patient at high volume centers.

Keywords

Case Report

A 21-year-old male, non-alcoholic, non-smoker with no known co-morbidities or adverse medical or surgical history was evaluated for living donor liver transplant. Family history was not significant. His general and systemic examination was unremarkable except for a systolic murmur. Haematological and biochemical parameters including liver function tests were normal. Chest X-ray showed no significant abnormality but Electrocardiogram (ECG) was suggestive of sinus arrhythmia with left axis deviation. Echocardiogram showed subaortic aneurysm with a small perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) and left to right shunt with normal ventricular size. A cardiology opinion was sought and the issue was discussed in a multidisciplinary team consisting of transplant surgeons, cardiologist, pulmonologist, hepatologist and anaesthesiologist. It was decided that though the risk of a perioperative complication was small, it was safer to offer VSD closure before proceeding with donor hepatectomy.

Transcatheter VSD closure with amplatzer duct occlude II was performed under transoesophageal echocardiography guidance with appropriate antibiotic and anticoagulant prophylaxis. He withstood the procedure well. Post intervention, echocardiography showed device in position and no residual VSD. He was discharged in a haemodynamically stable condition on day 2 of procedure on oral antiplatelet drugs (clopidogrel + aspirin). It was continued for four weeks.

He underwent donor right hepatectomy after one week of withholding the antiplatelet drugs. Operative time was 600 minutes and blood loss was 300 ml. He did not require intraoperative blood transfusion. Postoperation ECG and echocardiography were normal with no evidence of VSD. He was started on low molecular weight heparin on Postoperative Day (POD) 2 and was continued till the discharge. Postoperatively, he recovered well and was discharged in a stable condition on POD 6. He was not given any antiplatelet medication post hepatectomy. There was no complication reported at a follow up period of 6 months.

Discussion

Perimembranous VSD in a donor undergoing evaluation for living donor liver transplant is very rare finding and never been reported before. Perimembranous VSD are located in the membranous septum, a relatively small portion of the septum located near the heart valves, may also be described as outlet VSD. Membranous VSD can close at any time if a ventricular septal aneurysm is present. VSD occurs when there is a fault in the formation of any portion of the ventricular septum or components forming the septum do not appropriately grow together [1]. Perimembranous VSD is caused by failure of the fusion of endocardial cushions, the conotruncal ridges, and the muscular septum.

Most patients with small perimembranous VSD are asymptomatic but come to medical attention when a systolic murmur is discovered. Echocardiography is the most reliable noninvasive modality to identify the presence, size, number and location of the VSD. Small VSD do not cause symptoms in infancy or childhood and rarely require surgical or medical treatment. Option for intervention in VSD is either by surgery or by cardiac catheterization [2]. Recent studies comparing outcomes of surgical and percutaneous closure of isolated VSD reported early and delayed atrioventricular block in less than 1% in surgical and 3-20% in percutaneous closure group [3,4]. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous VSD is emerging as an accepted, viable alternative with low post procedure morbidity and mortality and hence was chosen as method for closure in our case [5].

There is no literature available to guide regarding course of action in such a condition. Patient with VSD have higher pressure than normal in the pulmonary capillaries and may predispose to parenchymal lung disease. Risks for surgical patients in this scenario include serious and frequent arrhythmia which may require regular medical follow-up. The risk of arrhythmia is greater if surgery is done in adulthood. There is also pertinent risk for Infective Endocarditis (IE) and even small VSDs may occasionally be a source of IE. Most adults with small VSDs are usually asymptomatic with normal physical examination except a loud murmur but few may develop heart failure and may need diuretics to control fluid accumulation along with inotropic agents.

Conclusion

The risk involved in major hepatectomy with small perimembranous VSD may be low and there are no previous studies to substantiate the risk. However, it should not be considered as an absolute contraindication for donor hepatectomy. Our case emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary approach and management of such patient at high volume centers. Optimum anticoagulation, endocarditis prophylaxis and optimum interval between the two procedures are areas to be defined as our experience with similar cases increases.

References

[1]Zhang J, Ko JM, Guileyardo JM, Roberts WC, A review of spontaneous closure of ventricular septal defect Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2015 28(4):516-20.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Chessa M, Butera G, Negura D, Transcatheter closure of congenital ventricular septal defects in adult: mid-term results and complications Int J Cardiol 2009 133(1):70-73.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Predescu D, Chaturvedi RR, Friedberg MK, Benson LN, Ozawa A, Lee KJ, Complete heart block associated with device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2008 136(5):1223-28.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Lin A, Mahle WT, Frias PA, Fischbach PS, Kogon BE, Kanter KR, Early and delayed atrioventricular conduction block after routine surgery for congenital heart disease The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2010 140(1):158-60.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Narin N, Baykan A, Pamukcu O, Argun M, Ozyurt A, Mese T, ADO II in Percutaneous VSD Closure in Pediatric Patients J Interv Cardiol 2015 28(5):479-84.  [Google Scholar]