JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Anatomy Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/22126.8428
Year : 2016 | Month : Sep | Volume : 10 | Issue : 09 Full Version Page : AC01 - AC04

Variations in the Origin and Course of Right Hepatic Artery and its Surgical Significance

Narayanaperumal Mugunthan1, Rajendran Kannan2, Christilda Felicia Jebakani3, Jayaram Anbalagan4

1 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
3 Professor & Research Supervisor, Department of Anatomy, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, Chennai, India.
4 Professor, Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Narayanaperumal Mugunthan, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Pillaiyarkuppam, Puducherry, Pincode -607402, India.
E-mail: dr.mugunth111@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Variations in the Right Hepatic Artery (RHA) are exceedingly common and these variations are of great importance to surgeons and interventional radiologists. A thorough knowledge of the right hepatic arterial anatomy is mandatory while performing hepatic surgery and hepatic arteriography.

Aim

To find out the variations in the origin and course of the RHA and its surgical significance.

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted in 60 embalmed adult cadavers of both sexes of age group between 50 to 80 years. Abdomen was opened by a linear midline incision extending from the xiphoid process to the pubic symphysis. The origin of RHA from the proper hepatic artery was traced. The presence of aberrant right hepatic arteries -replaced and accessory were noted. The source of origin of accessory or replaced RHA arising from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), right renal artery and inferior mesenteric artery was traced. The course of normal and aberrant RHA from its origin to the entrance into the right lobe of the liver was followed and structures related to it were noted.

Results

The RHA mostly originated from the main trunk of the proper hepatic artery in 52 specimens (86.6%). Presence of aberrant RHA was found in 8 specimens (13.3%). Among 8 specimens of aberrant RHA, replaced RHA arising from SMA was found in 5 specimens (8.3%) and accessory RHA arising from SMA was observed in 3 specimens (5%). In 86.6% of specimens, the RHA coursed dorsal to the duct system to enter the Calot’s triangle. In 8.3% of specimens, the RHA coursed ventral to duct system to reach the Calot’s triangle. The caterpillar like loop of the RHA was found in two specimens (3%). The replaced and accessory RHA (13.3%) arising from the SMA had a course dorsal to duct system to reach the Calot’s triangle.

Conclusion

Right hepatic artery is subject to anatomical variation in its origin and course. Our study identified the variations in the origin and course of right hepatic artery. Adequate knowledge of these variations would be of incredible help to the hepatobiliary surgeon and interventional radiologist.

Keywords

Introduction

Liver possesses dual blood supply; it receives blood from both the hepatic artery and the portal vein. Variations of the hepatic artery and its branches are exceedingly common. Variations in the origin and number of the hepatic arteries may be facilitated by defining the terms commonly used in describing such variations. These terms are “aberrant”, “accessory”, and “replacing”. A typical “normal” right hepatic artery (RHA) arises from the proper hepatic artery and supplies the right lobe of liver [1].

An aberrant RHA is one that arises from some other source than the proper hepatic artery. If an aberrant artery supplies the right lobe of the liver, the right lobe also receives supply from the proper hepatic artery of normal origin it is known as an aberrant accessory RHA. If an aberrant RHA constitutes the sole blood supply to the right lobe of the liver it is known as an aberrant replacing right hepatic artery, since it replaces the normal RHA [2].

RHA is known for its surgical and radiological importance. A thorough knowledge of the RHA anatomy is mandatory while performing hepatic surgery and hepatic arteriography. Because of anatomic variations in the RHA, surgical injuries in the liver can occur inadvertently by even the most experienced surgeon [2].

Hepatic arterial perfusion scintigraphy, Transhepatic Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Hepatic Arterial Infusion (HAI) chemotherapy are the newer therapeutic techniques used in the treatment of primary and metastatic hepatic tumors that derive most of its blood supply from the hepatic artery [3]. These procedures need expert knowledge on the origin, course and variations of the RHA. So, the present study was aimed to find out the frequency of variations in the origin and course of the RHA.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in 60 embalmed adult cadavers of the age group between 50-80 years, allotted for dissection to the first year MBBS students during the year 2012-2015 at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India. Abdomen was opened by a linear midline incision extending from the xiphoid process to the pubic symphysis. Anterior layer of peritoneum was removed from the lesser omentum close to the lesser curvature of the stomach. Coeliac trunk arising as a ventral branch from the abdominal aorta was traced. Origin of the common hepatic artery from the coeliac trunk, aorta and superior mesenteric artery (SAM) was traced. The common hepatic artery and its branch gastroduodenal artery were identified. Proper hepatic artery in the hepatoduodenal ligament was traced and the relation of the common hepatic artery and the proper hepatic artery were noted. Origin of the RHA was traced and the presence of aberrant right hepatic arteries: (i) Replaced; (ii) Accessory, were noted. To identify the presence of aberrant right hepatic arteries, abdominal aorta was exposed from the level of origin of the coeliac trunk to the level of origin of the inferior mesenteric artery. Presence of an accessory or replaced right hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery, RHA and inferior mesenteric artery were noted. The course of normal and aberrant RHA from its origin to entrance into the right lobe of the liver was traced and structures related to it were noted. Aberrant right hepatic arteries were painted and photographed for documentation.

Statistical Analysis

We used simple proportion (frequency analysis) with the help of Open Epi Version 3.0 software.

Results

The RHA originating from the main trunk of the proper hepatic artery was found in 52 specimens (86.6%). Presence of aberrant RHA was found in 8 specimens (13.3%). Among the 8 specimens of aberrant RHA: (a) Replaced RHA arising from SMA was found in 5 specimens (8.3%); (b) Accessory RHA arising from SMA was observed in 3 specimens (5%) [Table/Fig-1,2 and 3].

Variation of RHA in 60 cadavers.

Variation of RHANo. of variationsFrequency (%)95% Confidence Interval
Aberrant RHA813.35.9 to 24.6
Replaced RHA58.32.8 to 18.4
Accessory RHA351.0 to 13.9

N= 60


Replaced RHA arising from superior mesenteric artery.

ReRHA-replaced right hepatic artery, SMA-superior mesenteric artery, CT-coeliac trunk, LHA-left hepatic artery, LGA-left gastric artery, SA-splenic artery, GDA-gastroduodenal artery, RGA-right gastric artery, CyA-cystic artery.

Accessory RHA arising from superior mesenteric artery.

AcRHA-accessory right hepatic artery, SMA-superior mesenteric artery, CT-coeliac trunk, LHA-left hepatic artery, MHA –middle hepatic artery, LGA-left gastric artery, SA-splenic artery, GDA-gastroduodenal artery, RGA-right gastric artery, CyA-cystic artery.

In 52 specimens, the RHA after its origin from the proper hepatic artery crossed anterior to the portal vein from left to right and passed behind the common hepatic duct to enter the Calot’s triangle where it coursed to the left of the cystic duct as it approached the cystic duct. Within the Calot’s triangle, the RHA gives origin to cystic artery and then it turned upwards behind the right hepatic duct to enter the right lobe of liver [Table/Fig-4]. In 5 specimens, the RHA after its origin from the proper hepatic artery crossed the common hepatic duct anteriorly from left to right to enter the Calot’s triangle was observed [Table/Fig-5]. The caterpillar like loop of the RHA was found in 2 specimens (3%). In 1 specimen the RHA crossed the common hepatic duct anteriorly to enter the Calot’s triangle, where it made a characteristic caterpillar like loop (hump) convexity of which pointed upwards and to the right and in another specimen the RHA crossed the common hepatic duct posteriorly to enter the Calot’s triangle where it made a characteristic caterpillar like loop convexity of which point towards the right and the convexity was less marked in this specimen [Table/Fig-6].

RHA passing dorsal to the common hepatic duct.

CHA-common hepatic artery, LHA-left hepatic artery, CT-coeliac trunk, PHA-proper hepatic artery, LGA-left gastric artery, GDA-gastroduodenal artery, CyA-cystic artery, PV-portal vein, GB-gall bladder, CHD-common hepatic duct, LHD-left hepatic duct, RHD-right hepatic duct, CyD-cystic duct, CBD-common bile duct.

RHA passing ventral to the common hepatic duct.

LHA-left hepatic artery, CT-coeliac trunk, RHA –right hepatic artery, LHA-left hepatic artery, MHA-middle hepatic artery, LGA-left gastric artery, RGA –right gastric artery, GDA-gastroduodenal artery, CyA-cystic artery, PV-portal vein, GB-gall bladder, CHD-common hepatic duct, LHD-left hepatic duct, RHD-right hepatic duct, CyD-cystic duct, CBD-common bile duct.

Caterpillar hump of RHA.

CT-coeliac trunk, CHA-common hepatic artery, SA-splenic artery, PHA-proper hepatic artery, RHA-right hepatic artery, LHA-left hepatic artery, LGA-left gastric artery, GDA-gastroduodenal artery, CyA-cystic artery, Arrow head- caterpillar hump of RHA.

Aberrant (replaced and accessory) RHA arising from the SMA was found in 8 specimens (13.3%). The aberrant RHA passed upward from left to right dorsal to the portal vein and common hepatic duct to reach the Calot’s triangle where cystic artery was given and then ascended upwards behind the right hepatic duct to reach the right lobe of liver.

Discussion

During development, the coeliac axis is derived from the 10th ventral segmental artery and SMA from the 13th segmental artery. The 11th and 12th segmental arteries normally regress [4,5]. Variations occur during this development and regression of the ventral segmental arteries lead to the multiple anomalies. Following normal development, the common hepatic artery usually arises as one of the three major branches of the coeliac axis. The common hepatic artery continued as the proper hepatic artery which gives the origin of the RHA. There are numerous anatomic variations of the hepatic arterial tree in the adult which results from variable persistence of elements of the embryologic blood supply [6].

RM Jones and KJ Hardy reported the origin of RHA from the proper hepatic artery 75%, Sureka et al., 79.6%, Bhardwaj 65% and Molmenti et al., 80%. In the present study it is 86.6%. So in the present study, the normal origin of RHA is higher than previous studies [710]. Baburao Kardile et al., reported RHA arising from the proper hepatic artery of hepatomesenteric trunk, and its source of origin from abdominal aorta [11]. Such findings were not found in the present study.

The presence of aberrant RHA in the present study was compared with earlier research findings. Our study was in par with Thompson study [12]. However, in our study the percentage of aberrant RHA was lower than others study [Table/Fig-7] [2,7,10,1214]. The lower percentage of occurrence of aberrant RHA in the present study could be due to the less number of specimens studied compared to the earlier reports.

A comparative data on the occurrence of aberrant right hepatic artery.

Authors StudyAberrant RHA (%)
Thompson [12]13
Daseler et al., [13]24
Nicholas A Michels [2]26
Van Damme JP [14]24
R.M.Jones and K.J. Hardy [7]25.6
Molmenti et al., [10]20
Present Study13.3

In the present study, the presence of replaced and accessory RHA and its source of origin were compared with previous studies [Table/Fig-8,9] [2,810,13,15,16]. In our study, all the replaced and accessory RHA arose from the superior mesenteric artery alone. Nicholas A. Michels reported that in addition to the SMA, replaced RHA also found arising from coeliac trunk in 3%, from aorta in 2% and from the left gastric artery in 0.5% [2]. In the present study such origins of replaced RHA were not observed.

A comparative data on the presence of replaced and accessory right hepatic artery.

Authors StudyReplaced right hepatic artery(%)Accessory right hepatic artery(%)
Adachi [15]-12.3
Daseler et al., [13]16.87.2
BinitSureka et al., [8]15.165.16
NikhaBhardwaj [9]-5
Nicholas A.Michels [2]188
Molmenti et al., [10]15-205
Arunthathy Thangarajah and Ramesh Parthasarathy [16]93.5
Present study8.35

A comparative data on the source of origin of aberrant right hepatic artery.

Authors StudyReplaced RHAAccessory RHA
Source of originSource of origin
SMACTAORTALGASMACTRDADPARGA
Adachi [15]----10.3%2%---
Nicholas A Michels [2]12.5%3%2%0.5%4.5%0.5%2%0.5%0.5%
Molmenti et al., [10]15-20%---5%----
Arunthathy Thangarajah and Ramesh Parthasarathy [16]9%---3.5%----
Present Study8.3%---5%----

SMA - superior mesenteric artery, CT - coeliac trunk, LGA - left gastric artery, RDA -retroduodenal artery, DPA - dorsal pancreatic artery, RGA - right gastric artery.


Nicholas A Michel’s found accessory RHA in 8%, Binit Sureka et al., in 5.16%, Nikha Bhardwajin 5% and Molmenti et al., in 5%, Daseler et al., in 7.2%, Adachi in 12.3% [2,8,9,10,13,15]. In the present study accessory RHA was found in 5%, so the present study is in accord with Binit Sureka et al., Nikha Bhardwaj and Molmenti et al., study and lower than Adachi, Nicholas A. Michels and Daseler et al., study. Adachi also reported that the accessory RHA arising from the coeliac trunk in 2% in addition to SMA [15]. Nicholas A. Michels found it in addition to the SMA, 0.5% from the coeliac trunk, from retroduodenal artery in 2%, dorsal pancreatic artery in 0.5% and from the right gastric artery in 0.5% [2]. In the present study, all accessory RHA took origin from the SMA only. Braun MA et al., reported an unusual aberrant RHA arising from the right renal artery [17]. In the present study no such finding was observed.

According to Nicholas A Michels, Thompson, and Henry Hollinshead the coeliacal RHA may have a retrobiliary course in 85% (dorsal to duct system) and prebiliary course in 15% (ventral to duct system) [2,12,18]. Daseler et al., found in 80% the RHA coursing dorsal to duct and in 20% ventral to duct [13]. RHA was dorsal to duct in 75% and ventral to duct in 25% as per Russell T Wood Burne [19]. In the present study, in 86.6% RHA passes behind the duct system and in 8.3% the RHA passes anterior to the duct system.

The aberrant RHA from the SMA as per observation of Nicholas A Michels, in most instances proceeded upward dorsal to the portal vein [2] and Russell T Wood Burne stated that if the RHA appeared as the highest branch of the SMA, then it has to ascend through the lesser omentum posterior to the portal vein [19]. In the present study all the aberrant RHA (both replaced and accessory -13.3%) arising from the SMA passed upward from left to right and dorsal to the pancreas and portal vein and the common hepatic duct to reach the Calot’s triangle. The present study is in accordance with Nicholas A Michels and Russel T Wood Burne [2,19].

Limitation

The present study was done only at cadavers from South Indian locality. Prevalence of aberrant, replaced and accessory RHA based on genetic determination might limit generalization of findings to universal population. However the confidence intervals of three types of RHA (aberrant, replaced and accessory) in our study accommodate the percentages given by most of the author’s study in our comparison, justifying the generalization of study findings.

Conclusion

Right hepatic artery is subject to anatomical variations in its origin and course. Our study identified the variations in the origin and course of right hepatic artery. Thus a thorough knowledge of the right hepatic arterial anatomy and its variations in origin and course is mandatory for surgeons and radiologists in performing hepatic surgery and hepatic arteriography to avoid surgical injuries in the liver during operation procedures.

N= 60SMA - superior mesenteric artery, CT - coeliac trunk, LGA - left gastric artery, RDA -retroduodenal artery, DPA - dorsal pancreatic artery, RGA - right gastric artery.

References

[1]Poynter CWM, Congenital anomalies of the arteries and veins of the human body with bibliography 1922 22LincolnThe University studies of the University of Nebraska:1-106.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Michels NA, Blood supply and anatomy of the upper abdominal organs with a descriptive atlas 1955 Philadelphia and MontrealB. Lippincott Company:134-83.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Padhy AK, Radionuclide scintigraphy in hepatobiliary and splenic diseases GI Surgery Annual 1996 3:115-20.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Nebesar RA, Kornblith PL, Pollard JJ, Michels NA, Celiac and Superior Mesenteric Arteries 1969 BostonLittle & Brown:667-673.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Sadler TW, Langman’s Medical Embryology 1985 :196-205.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Kadir Saadoon Atlas of normal and variant angiographic anatomy 1991 WB Saunders Company:503-24.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Jones RM, Hardy KJ, The hepatic artery: a reminder of surgical anatomy JR Coll Surg Edinb 2001 46(3):168-70.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Sureka B, Mittal MK, Mittal A, Sinha M, Bhambri NK, Thukral BB, Variations of celiac axis, common hepatic artery and its branches in 600 patients The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging 2013 23(3):223-33.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Bhardwaj N, Anomalous origin of hepatic artery and its significance for hepatobiliary surgery Journal of Anatomical Society of India 2010 59(2):173-76.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Molmenti EP, Pinto PA, Klein J, Klein AS, Normal and variant arterial supply of the Liver and Gall Bladder Pediatr Transpl 2003 7:80-82.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Kardile PB, Ughade JM, Ughade MN, Dhende A, Ali SS, Anomalous Origin of the HepaticArtery from the Hepatomesenteric Trunk Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research :JCDR 2013 7(2):386-88.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Thompson IM, On the arteries and ducts in the hepatic pedicle; A study in statistical human anatomy Univ. California Publ Anat 1933 (1):55  [Google Scholar]

[13]Daseler EH, Anson BJ, Hambley WC, Reiman AF, Cystic artery and constituents of the hepatic pedicle Surg Gyn & Obst 1947 85:47  [Google Scholar]

[14]Van Damme JP, Bonte J, The branches of the celiac trunk Acta Anatomica 1985 122:110  [Google Scholar]

[15]Adachi B, Das arterien system der japaner, tokyo, kenkyusha press 1928 :28-54.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Thangarajah A, Parthasarathy R, Celiac Axis, Common. Hepatic and hepatic artery variants as evidenced on MDCT angiography in south indian population Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR 2016 10(1):TC01-5.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Braun MA, Collins MB, Wright P, An aberrant right hepatic arteryfrom the right renal artery Journal of Cardiovascular and interventional Radiology 1991 14(6):349-51.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Hollinshead H, Anatomy for Surgeons 1955 Volume 21st EditionCassell & co ltd:19-355.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Woodburne Russell T, Essentials of Human Anatomy 1957 1st editionNew YorkOxford University Press:417-22.  [Google Scholar]