Seroprevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Among Antenatal Women in One of the Institute of Northern India
Preetkanwal Sibia1, Manjit Kaur Mohi2, Amith Kumar3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Govt. Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
2 Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Govt. Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
3 Junior Resident, Department of Medicine, Govt. Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Preetkanwal Sibia, 23-B, Hira Nagar, Patiala, 147001, Punjab, India.
E-mail: drsibia1@yahoo.com
Introduction
As per NACO publication there are an estimated 2.08 Million HIV/AIDS cases in India as of February 2014. The estimated adult HIV prevalence in India is 0.27%, with a gender spit of 0.32% males and 0.22% females. Estimating the seroprevalence of HIV in a low risk population such as pregnant women provides essential information for an effective implementation of AIDS control programmes. In spite of an estimated adult HIV prevalence rate of 0.18% in Punjab, there are no previous studies among antenatal women to assess seroprevalence.
Aim
To assess the prevalence of HIV infection, among otherwise healthy pregnant females.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study reviewed treatment records of 3686 antenatal women who underwent HIV testing. Demographic, obstetric and laboratory data was recorded into a preset proforma. Available data was analysed using SPSS version 13.
Results
Total of 38 subjects tested positive for HIV infection. Seroprevalence rate was 1.03%. A 25 -30 years age group had most number of infected individuals with 22 (57.89%) subjects. Seropositivity was common among rural domicile. Only 9 (23.68%) was aware of their seropositive status. A total of 20 (52.63%) subjects were illiterate, 14 (36.84%) had received primary school education.
Conclusion
Seroprevalence rate of 1.03% reported in this study has been the highest among the contemporary articles published in last decade. Efficient surveillance along with proper implementation of Prevention of Parent to Child Transmission (PPTCT) is the need of the day. A prompt action at the hands of the authority will enable us to safeguard our present and future alike.
Introduction
Though India is categorized as low HIV prevalence nation, it has the third largest number of people living with HIV/AIDS [1]. NACO reports an estimated 2.08 million HIV/AIDS cases in India as of February 2014, of which 39% are females and 3.5% are children. The estimated adult HIV prevalence in India is 0.27%, with a gender spit of 0.32% males and 0.22% females. In Punjab, estimated adult HIV prevalence is reported to be 0.18%, with 39625 HIV positive cases reported (1993 to Feb 2014) from Integrated Counseling and Testing Centers (ICTC) [2].
HIV data from antenatal women has been used to monitor trends in the general population and to predict the seroprevalence in young children [3,4]. UNAID (The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS) reports reveal that mother-to-child transmission is the largest source of HIV infection among children below the age of 15 years. The parent-to-child transmission occurs in approximately 25 to 35% of HIV positive women, which accounts for 4% of the total HIV infection load in India [5]. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study of its kind attempting to assess the seroprevalence of HIV in antenatal females from Punjab.
HIV can be transmitted vertically through the placenta, exposure to vaginal fluids at the time of labor and through breast milk. Pooled data from various cohort studies conducted prior to preventive interventions, estimated the risk of in utero transmission to be approximately 10%, intrapartum transmission to be 15% and postpartum transmission to be between 10 and 15%. With effective PPTCT program, the risk of vertical transmission of HIV in children can be decreased to less than 2% [6].
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study reviewed treatment records of 3686 antenatal women who underwent HIV testing in our institution between 1st March 2013 and 28th February 2014. Demographic, obstetric and laboratory data was recorded into a preset proforma. Available data was analysed using SPSS version 13.
Results
A total of 38 subjects tested positive for HIV infection. Seroprevalence rate was 1.03%. A 25-30 years age group had most number of infected individuals with 22(57.89%) subjects [Table/Fig-1]. Seropositivity was common among rural domicile with 0.93% prevalence rate [Table/Fig-2]. Only 9 (23.68%) were aware of their seropositive status. A total of 20 (52.63%) subjects were illiterate, with a prevalence rate of 0.87% [Table/Fig-3]. A total of 24 (63.25%) were housewives with a prevalence rate of 0.89% [Table/Fig-4].
Frequency and seroprevalence based on age distribution among hiv positive subjects.
| Age Group | Total | Frequency (n) | Prevalence % |
|---|
| 18 – 25 years | 1322 | 12 | 0.90% |
| 25 – 30 years | 1817 | 22 | 1.21% |
| 30 – 35 years | 547 | 4 | 0.73% |
Frequency and seroprevalence based on domicile among hiv positive subjects.
| Domicile | Total | Frequency (n) | Prevalence % |
|---|
| Rural | 2876 | 27 | 0.93% |
| Urban | 810 | 11 | 1.35% |
Frequency and seroprevalence based on literacy among hiv positive subjects.
| Literacy | Total | Frequency (n) | Prevalence % |
|---|
| Illiterate | 2287 | 20 | 0.87% |
| Primary school education | 1026 | 14 | 1.36% |
| Secondary school education | 311 | 3 | 0.96% |
| Graduation and above | 62 | 1 | 1.61% |
Frequency and seroprevalence based on occupation among hiv positive subjects.
| Occupation | Total | Frequency (n) | Prevalence % |
|---|
| Housewife | 2678 | 24 | 0.89% |
| Labourer | 878 | 12 | 1.36% |
| Service | 130 | 2 | 1.53% |
Discussion
The average HIV prevalence among women attending antenatal clinic in India is 0.48% as per NACO annual report 2010-2011 [1]. The present study revealed a prevalence rate of 1.03%. Different authors have reported different seropositivity rates, ranging from 0.16% to 0.88%. Parmeshwari et al., from Namakkal District reported a seroprevalence of 0.7% among antenatal women [7]. The Rajasthan State AIDS Control Society (RSACS) reported 0.1–0.2% seropositivity over a period of five years (2006–2010) [8]. A Tamil Nadu sentinel surveillance showed that a median positivity rate of HIV infection among antenatal women was 0.65% in 2004 and 0.5% in 2005. HIV sentinel surveillance conducted by Maharashtra State AIDS Control Society (MSACS) revealed a decline in seropositivity among antenatal women from 1.25% (2005) to 0.75% (2006–2007) in urban areas [1]. [Table/Fig-5] describes recent studies about seroprevalence of HIV among antenatal women. While studies conducted at Miraj and Bombay in Maharashtra and Manipur have reported a much higher seropositivity of 4.5, 2.5 and 0.8%, respectively [9].
Review of literature – seropositivity of HIV in India.
| Study | Location | Seroprevalence |
|---|
| Parameshwari et al., (2009) [7] | Namakkal, TN | 0.70% |
| Gupta et al., (2007) [10] | AIIMS, New Delhi | 0.88% |
| Devi et al., (2012) [11] | Renga Reddy Dist, AP | 0.45% |
| Chaudhuri et al., (2007) [12] | Kolkata, WB | 0.16% |
| Ashtagi et al., (2011) [13] | Belgaum, Karnataka | 0.70% |
| Dash et al., (2012) [14] | Berhampur, Orissa | 0.66% |
| Kulkarni et al (2013) [15] | Nanded, Maharashtra | 0.76% |
| Mehta et al., (2013) [16] | Jamnagar, Gujarat | 0.38% |
| Kwatra et al., (2011) [17] | Ahmednagar, Maharashtra | 1.38% |
| Ukey et al., (2005) [18] | Nagpur, Maharashtra | 1.38% |
| Present Study (2016) | Patiala, Punjab | 1.03% |
Limitation
In general, processes such as increased urbanisation, migration and education are likely to influence patterns of spread of HIV. HIV prevalence differs greatly according to location (eg. urban and rural) and further coverage and utilisation of health services. Studies have observed large differences in HIV prevalence in various provinces and districts within the same country. Overall representativeness of sentinel sites is always an issue. There may be differences in sexual behaviour or in traditional practices. There are variations in the specificity of HIV kits.
Conclusion
During pregnancy the risk of transmission of HIV from mother to baby is 5 to 10% and during labor delivery it was reported to be 10-15%. Early identification and management as per PPTCT guidelines can decrease the transmission of HIV from mother to child.
[1]. National AIDS Control Organisation. Annual Report 2010-11 [Internet]. New Delhi: Department of AIDS Control, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; 2011 Mar p. 106. Available from: http://naco.gov.in/upload/REPORTS/NACO%20Annual%20Report%202010-11.pdf [Google Scholar]
[2]. Overview of HIV/AIDS in Punjab [Internet]. Chandigarh, India: Punjab State AIDS Control Society, Government of Punjab; 2014 Feb p. 4. Available from: http://www.punjabsacs.org/docs/Overview%20of%20HIV-AIDS%20in%20Punjab%20(Till%20February%202014).doc [Google Scholar]
[3]. Zaba B, Boerma T, White R, Monitoring the AIDS epidemic using HIV prevalence data among young women attending antenatal clinics: prospects and problems AIDS Lond Engl 2000 14(11):1633-45. [Google Scholar]
[4]. Boerma JT, Ghys PD, Walker N, Estimates of HIV-1 prevalence from national population-based surveys as a new gold standard Lancet Lond Engl 2003 362(9399):1929-31. [Google Scholar]
[5]. National Institute of Medical Statistics, Indian Council of Medical Research. India - HIV Estimates - 2006 [Internet]. New Delhi: National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2007 pp. 30. Available from: http://naco.gov.in/upload/Surveillance/Reports%20&%20Publication/Technical%20Report%20on%20HIV%20Estimation%202006.pdf [Google Scholar]
[6]. Shah I, HIV/AIDS in children. In: Parthasarathy A, editor Indian Academy of Pediatrics - Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases 2013 New DelhiJaypee Brothers:336-45. [Google Scholar]
[7]. Parameshwari S, Jacob MS, Vijayakumari JJ, Shalini D, Sushi MK, Sivakumar MR, A program on prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV at government hospital, Tiruchengode taluk, Namakkal district Indian J Community Med 2009 34(3):261 [Google Scholar]
[8]. Rajasthan State AIDS Control Society. HIV Sentinel Surveillance 2005-2010 [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2016 Apr 6]. Available from: http://www.rsacs.in/SentinelSurveillance.html [Google Scholar]
[9]. Lal S, Thakur B, The problem of HIV and AIDS in India Curr Sci 1995 69(10):833-34. [Google Scholar]
[10]. Gupta S, Gupta R, Singh S, Seroprevalence of HIV in pregnant women in North India: a tertiary care hospital based study BMC Infect Dis 2007 7:133 [Google Scholar]
[11]. Devi A, Shyamala R, The study of seroprevalence of HIV in pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital Pharm Lett 2012 4(6):1835-36. [Google Scholar]
[12]. Chaudhuri S, Bose S, Talukdar A, Ghosh US, Seroprevalence and utilization of therapeutic intervention in PPTCT services in a teaching hospital in Kolkata J Obstet Gynecol India 2007 57(3):251-56. [Google Scholar]
[13]. Ashtagi G, Metgud C, Walvekar P, Naik V, Prevalence of HIV among rural pregnant women attending PPTCT services at KLE hospital, Belgaum Al Ameen J Med Sci 2011 4(1):45-48. [Google Scholar]
[14]. Dash M, Mohanty I, Sahu S, Narasimham M, Padhi S, Panda P, Declining HIV seroprevalence among pregnant women in south Odisha, India: a six and half year tertiary care hospital based study Int J Biomed Adv Res 2012 3(7):546-51. [Google Scholar]
[15]. Kulkarni S, Doibale M, Trend of seroprevalence of HIV among antenatal clinic attendees at a tertiary care hospital Int J Basic Appl Med Sci 2013 3(1):257-62. [Google Scholar]
[16]. Mehta KD, Antala S, Mistry M, Goswami Y, Seropositivity of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, syphilis, and HIV in antenatal women in India J Infect Dev Ctries 2013 7(11):832-37. [Google Scholar]
[17]. Kwatra A, Bangal VB, Shinde K, Padaliya K, HIV seroprevalence among the pregnant population and utilisation of integrated counselling and training centre facilities at a teaching hospital in Rural Maharashtra Australas Med J 2011 4(10):566-70. [Google Scholar]
[18]. Ukey PM, Akulwar SL, Powar RM, Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in pregnancy in a tertiary care hospital Indian J Med Sci 2005 59(9):382-87. [Google Scholar]