Dentistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20965.8365
Year : 2016 | Month : Aug | Volume : 10 | Issue : 08 Page : ZC113 - ZC117

Effect of Alendronate with β – TCP Bone Substitute in Surgical Therapy of Periodontal Intra-Osseous Defects: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Rohini Naineni1, Vishali Ravi2, Dwijendra Kocherlakota Subbaraya3, Jammula Surya Prasanna4, Veerendranath Reddy Panthula5, Rekha Rani Koduganti6

1 Reader, Department of Periodontics, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
2 Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontics, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
3 Professor and Head, Department of Pedodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Sangareddy, Telangana, India.
4 Professor, Department of Periodontics, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
5 Professor, Department of Periodontics, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
6 Professor and Head, Department of Periodontics, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Rohini Naineni, Reader, Department of Periodontics, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana-500045, India.
E-mail: rohininaineni@yahoo.com
Abstract

Introduction

Alendronate (ALN), an aminobisphosphonate, inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption and also stimulates osteogenesis. Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP) is an osteoconductive graft material which provides a scaffold for bone formation and also a widely used drug delivery vehicle for growth factors and antibiotics. Drug delivery vehicles, like β-TCP, improve the potency of the drugs by specific local site delivery of the drug, optimal release characteristics and easy handling.

Aim

The aim of the this study was to evaluate the bone formation potential of 400μg ALN delivered in β-TCP in the treatment of periodontal intra-osseous defects.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients with periodontal defects were randomly assigned to 400μg ALN + β-TCP + Saline (test) group and β-TCP + Saline (active-control) group. Clinical parameters like Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) gain, Probing Depth (PD) reduction, post-operative Gingival Recession (GR) were assessed from the baseline, 3 months and 6 months recordings. Radiographic parameters like Linear Bone Growth (LBG), Percentage Bone Fill (%BF), and change in alveolar crest height (ACH) were assessed from baseline and 6 months radiographs.

Results

Mean measurements in the ALN test group for CAL gain (3.4 ± 0.74 mm), PD reduction (4.33 ± 0.82 mm), LBG (2.88 ± 0.88 mm), and %BF (51.98 ± 15.84%) were significantly greater with a p-value <0.05 compared to the mean measurements of CAL gain (2.20 ± 0.86 mm), PD reduction (3.20 ± 1.15 mm), LBG (1.70 ± 0.39 mm), and %BF (30.35 ± 6.88%) of the control group. There was mild alveolar crestal apposition (0.32 ± 0.68 mm) in the ALN test group and mild alveolar crestal resorption (-0.24 ± 0.40 mm) in the control group.

Conclusion

400μg ALN combined with β-TCP bone graft material was effective in improving soft tissue parameters, inhibiting alveolar crestal resorption and enhancing bone formation, compared to β-TCP alone.

Introduction

Intra-ossseous periodontal vertical defects are at a higher risk of disease progression when left untreated [1]. These intra-bony lesions are not always readily accessible to periodontal debridement and hence may require access flap surgery alone or in association with bone-resective techniques or regenerative procedures [2]. Though periodontitis is initiated by bacterial colonization, host response plays an essential role in the breakdown of tissue and bone [3]. Hence, pharmacological agents, like bisphosphonates, which modulate host responses are being tested as treatment modalities for periodontal lesions [47].

Alendronate (ALN), an aminobisphosphonate is a potent inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption with no adverse effect on the mineralization of bone [8,9]. The effectiveness of ALN in reducing alveolar bone resorption after mucoperiosteal flap surgery has been demonstrated in various studies [1012]. A single local dose of ALN can give an adequate distribution of the bisphosphonate to the bone, because of the high affinity of bisphosphonates to calcium ions in the bone mineral [13,14]. The inhibition of resorptive activity is thought to produce a shift in bone turnover equilibrium to more osteoblastic activity [15]. Giuliani et al., demonstrated the potential of bisphosphonates in stimulating formation of osteoblast precursors in human bone marrow cultures and demonstrated early osteoblastogenesis in vivo in mice [16]. Bisphosphonates are potent in ameliorating the oxidative stress induced by periodontal infection [17]. Tenenbaum HC et al., in a state of the art review stated that, due to their potential in accelerating bone formation, bisphosphonates provide an interesting management strategy to stimulate osteogenesis in conjunction with regenerative materials around osseous defects [18].

Calcium Phosphates (CAPs) are efficient bone substitutes owing to their excellent biocompatibility and compositional similarity to bone mineral [19]. The intrinsic porosity of calcium phosphates allows for the incorporation of growth factors and drugs and their slow and sustained release over time [19,20]. Sustained release of ALN was observed over 21 days in an in vitro model of ALN loaded calcium phosphate cement [21]. β-TCP, is a calcium phosphate ceramic with a Ca/PO4 ratio similar to natural bone mineral. It has been used as a drug delivery vehicle in several studies [2224].

ALN loaded bone substitutes have been developed in orthopedics for the treatment of osteoporosis [21,25]. This study was aimed to incorporate this concept of delivering ALN in a bone substitute for treating periodontal lesions. The rationale for using ALN was primarily for its potential as an inhibitor of bone resorption. However, its effect on bone formation in the treatment of human intra-osseous periodontal lesions has very limited documented research [2631]. This study was designed as a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-arm study to evaluate the efficacy of 400μg ALN delivered in β-TCP, in inhibiting alveolar crestal resorption and enhancing bone formation in the treatment of periodontal intra-osseous defects.

Materials and Methods

Study participants: The present 6-month, randomized, prospective, parallel, interventional, active-controlled study included a total of 32 patients (15 males and 17 females) aged between 30 to 50 years, with chronic periodontitis and each having at least one inter-proximal periodontal defect. The patients were selected from the outpatient section of the Department of Periodontics, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, India. Ethical clearance was obtained from the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Selection criteria: Systemically healthy patients having an intra-osseous defect with probing depth ≥ 7mm at baseline, presence of a ≥ 4mm vertical inter-proximal bone defect with at least one bony wall after surgical debridement and with no history of previous periodontal therapy were included in the study. Patients with known systemic diseases, aggressive periodontitis, smoking habit, known or suspected allergy to bisphosphonates, pregnant and lactating women, study tooth exhibiting tooth mobility greater than grade II and class III furcation defect were excluded from the study.

Study design and procedure: The patients were screened and eligible patients were randomly assigned by lottery method into the 400μg ALN + β-TCP + Saline (test) group and β-TCP + Saline (active-control) group in a ratio of 1:1. Only one periodontal defect per patient was included in the study. Investigator RK screened the patients and randomly assigned them to the test and control groups. Investigator RN performed the surgical procedure for all the study participants. Investigator JSP was blinded to the randomization and recorded the clinical soft tissue parameters at various time periods of the study. Investigator VR was also blinded and carried out the radiographic analysis. Prior to the initiation of the study, intra-examiner calibration was achieved for the blinded examiners.

Preparation of 400μg ALN solution: 1% ALN solution was prepared by dissolving 10mg ALN (Osteofos, Cipla Ltd., Roorke, India) in normal saline. A 40μl of this solution contains 400μg of ALN.

Clinical parameters: The soft tissue parameters were recorded to the nearest millimeter with the help of a UNC 15 probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, and IL.) and a fabricated customized acrylic occlusal stent with a guiding groove for the probe. The soft tissue parameters of CAL, PD and GR were recorded at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.

Radiographic parameters: Radiographs at baseline and 6 months were obtained as reproducible as possible using long cone paralleling technique with Rinn XCP device [Table/Fig-1,2,3 and 4].

Baseline radiograph of a test group patient.

Sixth month radiograph of a test group patient.

Baseline radiograph of control group patient.

Sixth month radiograph of control group patient.

The radiographs were digitized and then analyzed using AutoCAD 2006 software (Autodesk, Inc., California,U.S.). The anatomical landmarks of Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ), Alveolar Crest (AC), and Base of Defect (BD) were marked on the digitized radiographs based on the criteria set by Schei et al., [32]. The distances from CEJ to BD, CEJ to AC and CEJ to root apex were recorded for the baseline and 6 months radiographs and the radiographic parameters of LBG, %BF and change in Alveolar Crest Height (ACH) were evaluated. LBG was calculated as the difference between the CEJ to BD distance at baseline and CEJ to BD distance at 6 months. The %BF was obtained by dividing LBG by the radiographic defect depth at baseline. The change in the ACH was calculated as the difference between the CEJ to AC at baseline and CEJ to AC at 6 months. For any paired baseline and 6 month radiographs demonstrating any difference in the measurement from CEJ to the root apex of the defect tooth, measurements were corrected accordingly for elongation and foreshortening.

Surgical procedure: Full-mouth scaling and root planing and oral hygiene instructions were given to all the participants prior to the baseline surgical visit. Before the initiation of surgical procedure, the baseline clinical parameters were recorded and the baseline radiograph was taken. Local anesthesia (2% Xylocaine hydrochloride with 1:80000 adrenaline) was administered, a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was raised, and thorough root planing and debridement were performed [Table/Fig-5].

Intra-osseous defect after debridement.

Direct measurements of the intra-bony defect were recorded and final eligibility was confirmed. Based on the size of the defect, an approximate quantity of the β-TCP (Sorbone, Meta Biomed Co., Ltd., Korea) graft material was taken. For the test group patients, 40μl of 1% ALN solution containing 400μg of ALN, was added to the graft material using a micro pipette (Accumax, Fine Care Corporation, Ahmedabad). The ALN soaked β-TCP was allowed to sit for 10 minutes to permit binding of the drug into the β-TCP particles [21]. If wetting of graft was not complete, required quantity of saline was added with care, for complete wetting of the graft so as to get a moldable implantable material [Table/Fig-6].

Implantation of bone graft.

For the control group patients, β-TCP was soaked only in saline and used for implantation. The flaps were sutured using 3-0 braided silk sutures. Appropriate post-operative care and instructions were given and sutures were removed one week later. Throughout the study period patients were monitored for any adverse effects like pain, swelling, inflammation, infection and allergic reactions.

Outcomes: Radiographic hard tissue measurements of LBG, %BF and change in ACH were the primary outcomes. Clinical soft tissue parameters of CAL gain, PD reduction and degree of post-operative gingival recession were the secondary outcomes.

Statistical Analysis

Substituting the values of the primary outcome, linear bone growth, from a similar previous study [27], with a power of 95% and confidence interval of 95%, the sample size was estimated to be five for each group. Considering 10%-20% for attrition, and to detect mean differences of clinical and radiographic parameters between the two groups, a total of 16 in each group were included. All the analysis was done using SPSS version 18. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Comparison of intra-group values was done using paired t test and repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test. Inter-group analysis was done using independent sample t-test.

Results

Thirty patients of thirty two enrolled completed the study [Table/Fig-7]. One patient from the control group was lost to follow-up and one patient from the test group was excluded from analysis due to poor radiographic quality. There were no statistically significant differences observed in any of the baseline characteristics such as age, CAL, PD, GR, vertical osseous defect morphology (no. of walls of defect), defect depth, defect width and defect location of the study teeth in both the test and control groups indicating appropriate randomization [Table/Fig-8].

CONSORT patient flow chart.

Baseline characteristics between groups which show no significant difference:

Baseline CharacteristicsTest Group(n=15)Control Group(n=15)p-value*
MeanSDMeanSD
Age (years)38.003.3438.933.390.454 (NS)
CAL (mm)9.531.889.201.080.557(NS)
PD (mm)9.001.818.871.190.813 (NS)
GR (mm)0.531.550.330.490.640(NS)
Osseous defect depth (mm)7.541.808.002.280.610(NS)
Osseous defect width (mm)3.630.503.270.780.211 (NS)
Defect tooth: Multi-rooted77Same values (NS)
Single-rooted88
Defect tooth: Multi-rooted1112Same values (NS)
Single-rooted43
Osseous defect morphology
1 walled320.626(NS)
1.5 walled34
2 walled87
3 walled12
Mean ± SD (no.)1.77 ± 0.531.87 ± 0.58

*Independent sample t-test

CAL= Clinical Attachment Level; PD = Probing Depth; GR = Gingival Recession; NS = Not Significant.


Intra-group analysis of both the test and control treatment modalities showed significant improvements in the clinical soft tissue parameters and radiographic LBG and %BF [Table/Fig-9,10].

Intra-group analysis for clinical parameters:

GroupParameterVisitMeanSDp-value*Post-hoc test
Test GroupCAL(mm)Baseline9.531.88<0.001B>3>6
3 months6.801.86
6 months6.131.88
PD (mm)Baseline9.001.81<0.001B>3>6
3 months5.401.59
6 months4.671.68
GR (mm)Baseline0.531.55<0.0013,6>B
3 months1.531.41
6 months1.401.55
Control GroupCAL(mm)Baseline9.201.08<0.001B>3,6
3 months7.271.16
6 months7.001.07
PD (mm)Baseline8.871.19<0.001B>3>6
3 months6.401.12
6 months5.671.11
GR (mm)Baseline0.330.49<0.0013,6>B
3 months0.870.74
6 months1.200.77

*Repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test

Statistically significant at p < 0.05

CAL= clinical attachment level; PD = probing depth; GR = gingival recession.


Intra-group analysis for radiographic parameters:

GroupParameterBaseline6 monthsp-value*
MeanSDMeanSD
Test GroupCEJ-BD (mm)8.811.305.931.09<0.001
CEJ-AC (mm)3.271.132.951.290.088
Control GroupCEJ-BD (mm)8.591.096.890.97<0.001
CEJ-AC (mm)2.991.003.230.920.036

*Paired t test

Statistically significant at p < 0.05

CEJ = Cementoenamel Junction; BD = Base Of Defect; AC = Alveolar Crest.


The ALN test group, compared to the control group, showed significantly improved results for mean gain in CAL (p<0.001) and mean reduction in probing depth (p=0.004). The test group showed a mean LBG of 2.88 ± 0.88 mm which was statistically greater than 1.70 ± 0.39 mm obtained by the control group. The ALN test group showed crestal apposition in contrast to the crestal resorption shown by the control group. The %BF was significantly greater for the test group compared to the control group, indicating the effectiveness of ALN in enhancing bone formation [Table/Fig-11].

Inter-group analysis for clinical and radiographic parameters:

ParameterTest GroupControl Groupp-value*
MeanSDMeanSD
Change in CAL (mm) baseline to 3 months2.731.101.931.100.056
Change in CAL (mm) baseline to 6 months3.400.742.200.86<0.001
Change in PD (mm) baseline to 3 months3.601.122.471.130.01
Change in PD (mm) baseline to 6 months4.330.823.201.150.004
Change in GR (mm) baseline to 3 months1.000.850.530.520.079
Change in GR (mm) baseline to 6 months0.730.700.870.740.618
LBG: Change in CEJ-BD (mm) baseline to 6 months2.880.881.700.39<0.001
Change in CEJ-AC (mm) baseline to 6 months0.320.68-0.240.400.011
%BF (%) baseline to 6 months51.9815.8430.356.88<0.001

*Independent sample t test

† Statistically significant at p < 0.05

CAL= clinical attachment level; PD = probing depth; GR = gingival recession; CEJ = cementoenamel junction; BD = base of defect; AC = alveolar crest.


Discussion

The hypothesis tested in this study was that the combining of a host modulating agent, ALN, with a widely used osteoconductive grafting carrier material, β-TCP, would lead to favorable clinical and radiological outcomes. Osteofos used in the present study is easily available by prescription and very economical (Rs.5.48 per 10mg tablet). The addition of 400μg of it to β-TCP bone substitute has enhanced the bone formation potential. The ALN test group was more effective for all the parameters evaluated except for post-operative gingival recession, which was same in both the test and control groups [Table/Fig-11]. A parallel-arm design with each patient contributing one defect was selected, instead of a split mouth design, as Yaffe et al., in a rat model demonstrated that 10% of the topically applied 200μg radiolabelled ALN was absorbed by the alveolar bone at the experimental site and 20% to 30% of this absorbed ALN reached the alveolar bone on the contralateral side by systemic disposition [33]. Since ALN was delivered with β-TCP, an active-control, i.e., β-TCP, was employed in the study to prove the efficacy of ALN, instead of open flap debridement.

Binderman et al., showed that both 200μg and 400μg were effective in reducing bone loss following flap surgery in rats, but 400μg ALN was less effective than 200μg. They stated that 400μg possibly increased local acidity and thus interfered with anti-resorptive activity. However, the surface area of bone exposed to the drug in the rat model would be very minute compared to the human periodontal defects. Hence, in the present study 400μg dosage was utilized. Moreover, the drug was entrapped in β-TCP and was released over a period of time.

The present study showed a significant gain in CAL, reduction in PD as seen in previous studies which used ALN gel as Local Drug Delivery (LDD) [2830]. There was a significant increase in bone formation in the test group of the present study, which is in accordance with Srisubut et al., who demonstrated histologically the bone formation potential of ALN in rats using bioactive glass soaked in 2% ALN [15]. It was shown in their study that ALN did not cause cell death of osteoclasts, but only inhibited their function. Gupta et al., on using synthetic hydroxyapatite alloplast in conjunction with ALN obtained a higher mean LBG of 3.6 ± 0.29 compared to the 2.88 ± 0.88 of the present study [27]. The LBG and %BF obtained by the ALN test group in the present study was higher than that obtained by Sharma et al., in the treatment of chronic periodontitis using 1% ALN gel as LDD [28]. This increase in the radiographic hard tissue parameters in the present study could be due to the additional access flap surgery and the use of an osteoconductive bone graft material as a delivery vehicle for ALN.

There was no alveolar crestal resorption in the ALN test group which is in accordance to the findings of Binderman et al., Kaynak et al., and Fleish et al., that ALN has selectively high affinity to adsorb to bone mineral at the sites of active bone remodeling, especially the surgical wounds [12,34,35].

The binding of bisphosphonates to the calcium phosphates is due to the chemical interaction between them by the phosphate groups and also due to surface adsorbtion by electrostatic interactions [19]. The strong bonding of the first layer of bisphosphonates and β-TCP results from a chemical exchange of the phosphate group [36]. Subsequent layers of the drug bind to the β-TCP particles surface by weak electrostatic forces [24]. An initial burst release is due to diffusion of the drug adsorbed by weak electrostatic forces and a later slow release of the chemically bound drug occurs by the matrix degradation of the β-TCP.

Verzola et al., showed that ALN therapy resulted in enhanced osseointegration of implants in a rat model [37]. However, contrary to their finding, Guimarães et al., in a rabbit model showed that ALN therapy did not favour osseointegration of implants [38]. Avascular osteonecrosis of the jaw has been reported in cancer and osteoporosis patients who were on long-term, systemic administration of bisphosphonates [39]. The present study used a single, local, low concentration of ALN and no adverse effects were found in any of the patients throughout the study period. Both the anti-resorptive and bone regenerative potential of ALN can be tapped and used as a treatment modality for periodontal defects.

Limitation

The present, short, six-month study had a small sample size, hence, further long term studies with larger sample size have to be performed focusing on the dosage of ALN and the long term prognosis of ALN on bone remodeling.

Conclusion

The present study showed that the predictability of bone formation increased by adding a host modulating agent like ALN to bone graft materials. Histologic studies are required to confirm the bone formation potential and effective dosage of ALN in human intra-osseous defects. Further research to produce an efficient drug delivery vehicle for controlled sustained release of the drug is required.

*Independent sample t-testCAL= Clinical Attachment Level; PD = Probing Depth; GR = Gingival Recession; NS = Not Significant.*Repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test Statistically significant at p < 0.05CAL= clinical attachment level; PD = probing depth; GR = gingival recession.*Paired t test Statistically significant at p < 0.05CEJ = Cementoenamel Junction; BD = Base Of Defect; AC = Alveolar Crest.*Independent sample t test† Statistically significant at p < 0.05CAL= clinical attachment level; PD = probing depth; GR = gingival recession; CEJ = cementoenamel junction; BD = base of defect; AC = alveolar crest.

References

[1]Papapanou PN, Wennstrõm JL, The angular bony defects as indicator of further alveolar bone loss J Clin Periodontol 1991 18:317-22.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Trombelli L, Heitz-Mayfeild L, Needleman I, Moles D, Scabbia A, A systematic review of graft materials and biological agents for periodontal intraosseous defects J Clin Periodontol 2002 29:117-35.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Graves D, Cytokines that promote periodontal tissue destruction J Periodontol 2008 79:1585-91.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Weinreb M, Quartuccio H, Seedor JG, Aufdemorte TB, Brunsvold M, Chaves E, Histomorphometrical analysis of the effects of bisphosphonate alendronate on bone loss caused by experimental periodontitis in monkeys J Periodontal Res 1994 29:35-40.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Reddy MS, Weatherford TW 3rd, Smith CA, West BD, Jeffcoat MK, Jacks TM, Alendronate treatment of naturally-occurring periodontitis in beagle dogs J Periodontol 1995 66:211-17.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Jeffcoat MK, Cizza G, Shih WJ, Genco R, Lombardi A, Efficacy of bisphosphonates for the control of alveolar bone loss in periodontitis J Int Acad Periodontol 2007 9:70-76.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Rocha M, Nava LE, Vázquez de la Torre C, Sánchez-Márin F, Garay-Sevilla ME, Malacara JM, Clinical and radiological improvement of periodontal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with alendronate: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial J Periodontol 2001 72:204-09.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Altundal H, Gursoy B, The influence of alendronate on bone formation after autogenous free bone grafting in rats Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005 99:285-91.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Hwang JS, Liou MJ, Ho C, Lin JD, Huang YY, Wang CJ, The effects of weekly alendronate therapy in Taiwanese males with osteoporosis J Bone Miner Metab 2010 28:328-33.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Yaffe A, Fine N, Alt I, Binderman I, The effect of bisphosphonate on alveolar bone resorption following mucoperiosteal flap surgery in the mandible of rats J Periodontol 1995 66:999-1003.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Reddy GT, Kumar TM, Veena KM, Formulation and evaluation of alendronate sodium gel for the treatment of bone resorptive lesions in periodontitis Drug Deliv 2005 12:217-22.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Binderman I, Adut M, Yaffe A, Effectiveness of local delivery of alendronate in reducing alveolar bone loss following periodontal surgery in rats J Periodontol 2000 71:1236-40.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Yaffe A, Iztkovich M, Earon Y, Alt I, Lilov R, Binderman I, Local delivery of an amino bisphosphonate prevents the resorptive phase of alveolar bone following muco-periosteal flap surgery in rats J Periodontol 1997 68:884-89.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Sato M, Grasser W, Endo N, Akins R, Simmons H, Thompson DD, Bisphosphonate action. Alendronate localization in rat bone and effects on osteoclast ultrastucture J Clin Invest 1991 88:2095-2105.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Srisubut S, Teerakapong A, Vattraphodes T, Taweechaisupapong S, Effect of local delivery of alendronate on bone formation in bioactive glass grafting in rats Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007 104:e11-16.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Giuliani N, Pedrazzoni M, Negri G, Passeri G, Impicciatore M, Girasole G, Bisphosphonates stimulate formation of osteoblast precursors and mineralized nodules in murine and human bone marrow cultures in vitro and promote early osteoblastogenesis in young and aged mice in vivo Bone 1998 22:455-61.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Oktay S, Chukkapalli SS, Rivera-Kweh MF, Velsko IM, Holliday LS, Kesavalu L, Periodontitis in rats induces systemic oxidative stress that is controlled by bone-targeted antiresorptives J Periodontol 2015 86(1):137-45.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Tenenbaum HC, Shelemay A, Girard B, Zohar R, Fritz PC, Bisphosphonates and periodontics: potential applications for regulation of bone mass in the periodontium and other therapeutic/diagnostic uses J Periodontol 2002 73:813-22.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Bose S, Tarafder S, Calcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: a review Acta Biomater 2012 8:1401-21.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Ginebra MP, Canal C, Espanol M, Pastorino D, Montufar EB, Calcium phosphate cements as drug delivery materials Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2010 64:1090-1110.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Jindong Z, Hai T, Junchao G, Bo W, Li B, Qiang WB, Evaluation of a novel osteoporotic drug delivery system in vitro: alendronate-loaded calcium phosphate cement Orthopedics 2010 :33  [Google Scholar]

[22]Urist MR, Lietze A, Dawson E, Beta-tricalcium phosphate delivery system for bone morphogenetic protein Clin Orthop 1984 187:277-80.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Nevins M, Giannobile WV, McGuire MK, Kao RT, Mellonig JT, Hinrichs JE, Platelet-derived growth factor stimulates bone fill and rate of attachment level gain: Results of a large multicentre randomized controlled trial J Periodontol 2005 76:2205-15.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Tarafder S, Bose S, Polycaprolactone-coated 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: in vitro alendronate release behaviour and local delivery effect on in vivo osteogenesis ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2014 6:9955-65.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Zhao J, Tang H, Wang J, Li G, Local treatment of osteoporosis with alendronate loaded calcium phosphate cement Chin Med J (Engl) 2014 127(22):3906-14.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Veena HR, Prasad D, Evaluation of an aminobisphosphonate (alendronate) in the management of periodontal osseous defects J Indian Soc 2010 14:40-45.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Gupta J, Gill AS, Sikri P, Evaluation of the relative efficacy of an alloplast used alone and in conjunction with an osteoclast inhibitor in the treatment of human periodontal infrabony defects: a clinical and radiological study Indian J Dent Res 2011 22:225-31.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Sharma A, Pradeep AR, Clinical efficacy of 1% alendronate gel as a local drug delivery system in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial J Periodontol 2012 83:11-18.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Sharma A, Pradeep AR, Clinical efficacy of 1% alendronate gel in adjunct to mechanotherapy in the treatment of aggressive periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial J Periodontol 2012 83:19-26.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Pradeep AR, Sharma A, Rao NS, Bajaj P, Naik SB, Kumari M, Local drug delivery of alendronate gel for the treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis with diabetes mellitus: a double-masked controlled clinical trial J Periodontol 2012 83:1322-28.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Pradeep AR, Kanoriya D, Singhal S, Garg V, Manohar B, Chatterjee A, Comparitive evaluation of subgingivally delivered 1% alendronate versus 1.2% atorvastatin gel in treatment of chronic periodontitis a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial J Investig Clin Dent 2016; Apr 19 [Epub ahead of print]  [Google Scholar]

[32]Schei O, Wearhaug J, Lovdal A, Arno A, Alveolar bone loss as related to oral hygiene and age J Periodontol 1959 30:7-16.  [Google Scholar]

[33]Yaffe A, Binderman I, Breuer E, Pinto T, Golomb G, Disposition of alendronate following local delivery in a rat jaw J Periodontol 1999 70:893-95.  [Google Scholar]

[34]Kaynak D, Meffert R, Gunhan M, Gunhan O, Ozakaya O, A histopathological investigation on the effects of the bisphosphonate alendronate on resorptive phase following mucoperiosteal flap surgery in the mandible of rats J Periodontol 2000 71:790-96.  [Google Scholar]

[35]Fleisch H, Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action Endocr Rev 1998 19:80-100.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Roussière H, Fayon F, Alonso B, Rouillon T, Schnitzler V, Verron E, Reaction of zolendronate with β-tricalcium phosphate for the design of potential drug device combined systems Chem Mater 2008 20:182-91.  [Google Scholar]

[37]Verzola MH, Frizzera F, de Oliveira GJ, Pereira RM, Rodrigues-Filho UP, Nonaka KO, Effects of long-term administration of alendronate on the mechanical properties of the basal bone and on osseointegration Clin Oral Implants Res 2015 26(12):1466-75.  [Google Scholar]

[38]Guimarães MB, Bueno RS, Blaya MB, Shinkai RS, Marques LM, Influence of the local application of sodium alendronate gel on osseointegration of titanium implants Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015 44(11):1423-29.  [Google Scholar]

[39]Woo SB, Hellstein JW, Kalmar JR, Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaws Ann Intern Med 2006 144:753-56.  [Google Scholar]