JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Microbiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17530.8044
Year : 2016 | Month : Jun | Volume : 10 | Issue : 06 Full Version Page : DC10 - DC12

Detection of Respiratory Syncytial Virus using Direct Fluorescent Antibody Assay in Paediatric Patients with Acute Respiratory Tract Infection

Roopa Bhandary1, Rekha Boloor2

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, Kuntikana, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
2 Professor and Head of Department, Department of Microbiology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Roopa Bhandary, Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, Kuntikana, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drroopasmailbox@rediffmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) pulmonary disease manifesting as bronchiolitis and pneumonia continues to play a major role in the childhood mortality and morbidity. Hence the present study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of RSV among hospitalized children presenting with Acute Respiratory Tract Infection (ARTI) and its correlation with risk factors.

Aim

To determine the occurrence of RSV related respiratory tract infection in paediatric patients and to access the risk factors and clinical features associated.

Materials and Methods

RSV antigen detection was performed by Direct Fluorescent Antibody (DFA) staining on 100 nasopharyngeal aspirate collected from hospitalized children below 5 years of age with a diagnosis of ARTI.

Results

Out of the 100 samples tested for RSV with DFA, 22 (22%) were found RSV positive with a mean age of 12 months and a male to female ratio of (1.75:1). Clinical features significantly associated with RSV were wheezing and breathlessness. Congenital heart disease (CHD) and prematurity were the risk factors significantly associated with RSV infection.

Conclusion

RSV infection is a significant cause of morbidity among children presenting with ARTI. In resource limited countries DFA can be used as an important tool for rapid detection of RSV and can potentially eliminate prolonged hospitalization and unnecessary use of antibiotics.

Keywords

Introduction

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is one of the most common causes of viral ARTI. It predominantly manifests as bronchiolitis followed by pneumonia [1,2]. According to WHO reports the estimated prevalence of RSV globally is 64 million cases and 1,60,000 deaths every year. RSV related pulmonary disease plays a major role in childhood mortality and morbidity [3]. The mortality rate amongst children hospitalized with RSV infection ranges from 0 -33%. Morbidity and mortality from RSV is more in patients with underlying illness [4]. Detection of RSV using rapid, sensitive and specific diagnostic test has further confounded the role of RSV in childhood respiratory tract infections [5].

The prevalence rates in northern and western parts of India have been studied, however, there are very few studies that determine the occurrence in Southern parts of India [68].

Aim

Hence, the present study was undertaken to estimate the occurrence of RSV related respiratory tract infection in pediatric age group in our set up and to assess the risk factors and clinical features associated with RSV infection.

Materials and Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on pediatric inpatient groups (0-5 years) in Father Muller Medical College over a period of 2 years from July 2011 to July 2013. A total of 100 patients were screened for RSV infection. Children presenting with fever, cough, rhinorrhea, sore throat and with evidence of fast breathing, wheezing or apnea or stridor were included in the study. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected from the selected patients after informed consent. The demographic profile of children, clinical symptoms and risk factors were documented. Nasopharyngeal aspirate was processed for RSV DFA smear preparation. Procedure supplied with the kit was followed. (Light Diagnostics, Millipore, USA).

Slides were examined by fluorescence microscopy with appropriate filter combination for FITC (excitation peak 490nm, emission peak 520nm) and were examined for cells with apple green fluorescence first under 100 to 200x, then detailed examination under 400x. These slides were then compared with positive and negative control slides supplied with the kit. Specimens showing one or more cells with characteristic cytoplasmic globular speckled fluorescence were considered positive for RSV [Table/Fig-1]. Specimens in which at least 20 epithelial cells with no fluorescence was observed was considered negative for RSV [Table/Fig-2]. Specimens with fewer than 20 cells with no fluorescence were rejected for DFA analysis. If the positive and negative control slides could not be clearly distinguished the test was considered invalid. Perinuclear and or diffuse cytoplasmic staining was considered nonspecific [Table/Fig-3]. (Ref: Based on the criteria mentioned in the kit Light Diagnostics, Millipore, USA).

Positive for RSV.

Negative for RSV.

Nonspecific fluorescence.

Results

Out of the 100 samples tested 22 patients were positive for RSV and 78 patients were negative for RSV. [Table/Fig-4] shows that RSV infection was more common in the age group of 1-5 months (31.8%).

Age distribution of RSV positive patients.

Age groupNo of patients
Below 1 months2
1-5 months7
6-12 months5
13-24 months4
24-36 months1
above 36 months3

The mean age group of RSV positive patients was 12 months and the male to female ratio of RSV positive patients was 1.75:1.

Approximately 81.8% of RSV positive children had a cough at admission but no statistically significant difference was observed when compared to the RSV negative group (83.1% vs. 81.8%, p >0.05). Two clinical parameters showed significantly different rates (p-value < 0.05) when comparing both the groups: wheezing and breathlessness was observed predominantly in the RSV positive group (50% vs. 10.3% and 68.2% vs. 35.7%, respectively yielding a p-value <0.05). Patients infected with RSV did not differ significantly in terms of other signs and symptoms as compared to RSV negative group. [Table/Fig-5] describes the signs and symptoms of RSV positive and RSV negative group.

Comparison of clinical features of RSV positive and RSV negative patient. *p<0.01, **p<0.001

Clinical featuresRSV positiven=22(22%)RSV negativen=78(78%)p-value
Fever8 (36.4%)41(52.6%)0.179
Cough18(81.8%)64(83.1%)0.887
Breathlessness15 (68.2%)28(35.7%)0.007*
Wheezing11(50%)8(10.3%)0.000**
Coryza3 (13.6%)23(29.5%)0.134
Sore throat0 (0%)10 (12.8%)0.171
Ear pain0 (0%)2 (2.6%)0.607

[Table/Fig-6] shows that preterm birth and congenital heart disease were significantly associated with RSV positive patients (p-value <0.005). However, no statistically significant correlation was associated with asthma, neuromuscular defect, immunosuppression and bottle fed infants (p-value > 0.05).

Comparison of risk factors between RSV positive and RSV negative patients. *p<0.01, **p<0.001

Risk factorsRSV Positiven=22(22%)RSV NegATIVEn =78(78%)p-value
Congenital heart disease3(13.6%)1 (25%)0.009*
Asthma3(13.6%)4 (5.1%)0.304
Neuromuscular defect1(4.5%)0 (0%)0.220
Immunosuppression0(0%)1(1.3%)0.780
Preterm birth9(40.9%)2 (2.6%)0.000**
Bottle fed2(9.1%)3 (3.8%)0.658

Out of the 22 RSV positive patients, majority of the patients 68.18% (15/22) had no abnormality detected and 38.18% (7/22) had findings on X-ray.

[Table/Fig-7] shows that the predominant X- ray findings among the RSV positive patients was interstitial infiltrates 18.18% (4/6) followed by hyperinflation and patchy infiltrates.

X- ray features associated with RSV positive patients.

X – ray featuresRSV positive patient’s n (%)
Interstitial infiltrates4 (18.18%)
Hyperinflation2 (9.09%)
Patchy infiltrates1 (4.54%)

Discussion

Previous hospital based studies from India reported RSV prevalence rates that were similar to the findings in present study of 22% among children with ARTI. Bharaj et al., reported RSV prevalence of 20.3% from Northern India [6] and Yeolekar et al., reported 26% prevalence in Western India [7]. Broor et al., reported 30% prevalence of RSV in the community among children in rural North India [8].

Studies show that RSV affects mainly children during the 1st year of life [9]. According to our study, 54.5% of children were younger than 1 year old suggesting that illness caused by RSV can be severe in this age group.

Males are known to be prone to severe RSV ARTI as boys have shorter and narrower airways and are at a greater risk for bronchial obstruction in case of RSV infection [10]. In this study, the ratio of boys to girls in RSV positive group was found to be 1.75:1.

In the present study, wheezing and breathlessness were predominantly observed in RSV positive group (p-value <0.005). This is in accordance to the study done by Diniz et al., who noted that wheezing was significantly more frequent in the RSV positive group [11].

In this study, prematurity and congenital heart diseases were the two factors that independently correlated with the disease severity. Studies done by Mac Donald et al., & Navas et al., shows that infants with CHD are prone for RSV infection and have a higher mortality rates [12,13].

Studies show that premature infants are at an increased risk for RSV infection, the reason being inadequate cellular immunity and small, immature alveoli [14].

In this study, we could not demonstrate a significant association between lack of breast feeding and RSV positivity. This was in accordance with the FLIP-2 study and the Canadian PICNIC study where the protective effect of breast feeding on RSV infection could not be demonstrated [15,16].

The radiological findings in our study have shown that 18.18% of RSV-positive patients developed interstitial infiltrate. Diniz et al., found a significant correlation between viral lower respiratory tract infection and interstitial infiltrate [11].

RSV DFA has a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 96.8% respectively and can detect RSV antigens even in conditions where the virus cannot be isolated [17].

Limitation

The possible limitation of this study was the lack of use of confirmatory test like RT- PCR or virus culture.

Conclusion

RSV infection plays a major role in childhood morbidity as is indicated by the prevalence rate in children hospitalized for ARTI. Our results also emphasize that routine testing of RSV using rapid tests can reduce the unnecessary use of antibiotics and also infection control precautions can be applied to prevent the transmission of infection to other patients and staff.

References

[1]Al-Ayed MS, Asaad AM, Qureshi MA, Ameen MS, Viral etiology of respiratory infections in children in south western Saudi Arabia using multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction Saudi Medical Journal 2014 35(11):1348-53.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Shay DK, Holman RC, Newman RD, Bronchiolitis associated hospitalizations among US children, 1980-1996 JAMA 1999 282(15):1440-46.  [Google Scholar]

[3]World Health Organization. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Available at:http://www.who.int/vaccine_research/diseases/ari/en/index3.html  [Google Scholar]

[4]Welliver RC, Checchia PA, Bauman JH, Fatality rates in published reports. RSV hospitalization among high risk and otherwise healthy children Curr Med Res Opin 2010 26(9):2175-81.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Gardner PS, Rapid diagnostic techniques in clinical virology Mod Trends Med Virol 1970 2:15-50.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Bharaj P, Sullender WM, Kabra SK, Respiratory viral infections detected by multiplex PCR among pediatric patients with lower respiratory tract infection seen at a urban hospital in Delhi from 2005 – 2007 Virol J 2009 6:89  [Google Scholar]

[7]Yeolekar LR, Respiratory viruses in acute respiratory tract infections in Western India Indian J Pediatr 2008 75(4):341-45.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Broor S, Parveen S, Bharaj P, A prospective three-year cohort study of the epidemiology and virology of acute respiratory infections of children in rural India PLoS ONE 2007 2:e491  [Google Scholar]

[9]Lee JT, Chang LY, Wang LC, Epidemiology of respiratory syncytial virus infection in northern Taiwan, 2001–2005–seasonality, clinical characteristics, and disease burden J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2007 40:293-01.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Simoes EA, Environmental and demographic risk factors for respiratory syncytial virus lower tract disease J Pediatr 2003 143:118-26.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Diniz EMA, Vieira RA, Ceccon MEJ, Ishida MA, Vaz FAC, Incidence of respiratory viruses in preterm infants submitted to mechanical ventilation Rev Inst Med trop S Paulo [online] 2005 47(1):37-44.[cited 2015-12-29]  [Google Scholar]

[12]MacDonald NE, Hall CB, Suffin SC, Respiratory syncytial viral infection in infants with congenital heart disease N Engl J Med 1982 307:397-400.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Navas L, Wang E, de Carvalho V, Robinson J, Improved outcome of respiratory syncytial virus infection in a high-risk hospitalize population of Canadian children. Pediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada J Pediatr 1992 121:348-54.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Resch B, Resch E, Müller W, Should respiratory care in preterm infants include prophylaxis against Respiratory Syncytial virus infection. The case in favor Paediatr Respir Rev 2013 14:130-36.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Thomas NJ, Hollenbeak CS, Ceneviva GD, Palivizumab prophylaxis to prevent respiratory syncytial virus mortality after pediatric bone marrow transplantation: a decision analysis model J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2007 29:227-32.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Cole PD, Suh JS, Onel K, Stiles J, Benign outcome of RSV infection in children with cancer Med Pediatr Oncol 2001 37:24-29.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Tang YW, JW Crowe, Respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus, p. 1361-1377. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. L. Landry, and M. A. Pfaller (ed.) Manual of clinical microbiology 2007 vol. 29th edWashington, DCAmerican Society for Microbiology Press  [Google Scholar]