JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pharmacology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17940.7912
Year : 2016 | Month : Jun | Volume : 10 | Issue : 06 Full Version Page : FF01 - FF04

Preventive and Protective Effect of Nishamalaki in STZ Induced Diabetic Complications in Wistar Rats

Jayshree Shriram Dawane1, Vijaya Anil Pandit2, Swapnil Suryakant Deshpande3, Amruta Sumedh Mandpe4

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, BVDU Medical College, Pune, India.
2 Professor, Department of Pharmacology, BVDU Medical College, Pune, India.
3 Resident, Department of Pharmacology, BVDU Medical College, Pune, India.
4 Resident, Department of Pharmacology, BVDU Medical College, Pune, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Jayshree Shriram Dawane, Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, BVDU Medical College, Dhankawadi, Pune-411046, India.
E-mail: jayshreedawane@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Diabetes is a metabolic disease of vital health importance because of the complications associated with it. Clinical trials and animal studies have demonstrated the anti-hyperglycaemic effect of Nishamalaki. Present study was planned to evaluate the protective potential of Nishamalaki on diabetic complication in rats.

Aim

To study the Nephro-protective effect and to assess the protective potential on retinal changes of Nishamalaki in diabetic wistar rats.

Materials and Methods

Diabetes induced with 60 mg/kg of Streptozotocin and 110 mg/kg Nicotinamide IP. Nishamalaki, a combination of Curcuma longa and Emblica officinalis administered orally with honey. Rats divided into six groups, control and diabetic rats with blood glucose above 250 mg/dl were divided into 5 groups. After 8 weeks test animals were treated with Nishamalaki, Enalapril and control with saline for 30 days. Biochemical parameters measured like Serum BSL, BUN and Creatinine and rats were observed for development of cataract. Rats sacrificed and kidney samples were taken to examine histopathological changes.

Results

Blood Urea Nitrogen and Creatinine values were significantly (p<0.01) reduced in Nishamalaki group than control group. Nishamalaki showed the protective effect on kidney pathology as seen on histopathology by near normal glomerular and tubular structures. Control group showed shrunken glomerulus and tubular vacuolations. In Nishamalaki group immature sub capsular cataract with mild lenticular opacity were seen compared to the mature cataract with significant lenticular opacity and corneal vascularisation in control group.

Conclusion

Nishamalaki showed protective effect on development of Nephrotoxicity and it has also delayed the progression of cataract in rats.

Keywords

Introduction

Alarming increase in incidence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) has been observed worldwide and is considered as one of the main threats to human health in the 21st century in both developed and developing nations [1]. Amongst the two types, Type 2 diabetes seems to be more prevalent illness. In adults, Type 2 diabetes accounts for about 90 to 95 percent of all diagnosed cases of diabetes [2]. Diabetic complications are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in persons with diabetes. The risk of developing diabetic complications depends on both the duration and the severity of hyperglycaemia [3]. Chronic hyperglycaemia is a major initiator of diabetic microvascular complications e.g., retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy [4]. Premature death in patients of diabetes has been reported, approximately in 50% due to cardiac complication and 10% by renal failure from the total of type 2 diabetics [5].

A dramatic increase in the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy has been noted in India as well, which has become the single most common cause of end-stage kidney disease [6]. The estimated overall incidence rate of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in India is currently 800 per million populations [7].

Cataract, characterized by cloudiness or opacification of the eye lens, is the leading cause of blindness all over the world especially in developing countries [8]. One of the most important causes of visual impairment in subjects with Type 2 DM is diabetic maculopathy & cataract which causes blindness and visual morbidity [9].

In Modern medical a vast variety of measures are used like lifestyle modification and pharmacological interventions for preventing and controlling hyperglycaemia [10]. No remedies are available to prevent or treat these complications at early stage so patients tend to try agents from alternative systems of medicine. Herbal medicines promoted as effective and having no adverse effects. Nishamalaki (NA) is a combination of Curcuma longa and Emblica officinalis. Studies have demonstrated the antidiabetic effect of Nishamalaki [11,12]. Individual agents are found to be effective in preventing various complications of diabetes. Curcuma has been studied for renoprotective [13], cataract preventing [14] antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anti-carcinogenic activities [15] and Embilica officinalis is rennoprotective, causes insulin release [16] hepatoprotective, gastroprotective, immunomodulator [17,18]. No studies are available on the Nishamalaki preparation for its protective effect on the prevention of diabetic complications.

Aim

Present study was aimed to study the protective potential of Nishamalaki in diabetic wistar rats on renal changes & delaying the progression of cataract.

Materials and Methods

IAEC approval (IAEC/BVDUMC/0139/2012-2013) was obtained and study was started. Wistar rats of either sex, weighing 150-200 gms were and 6-8 weeks used for the study. They were housed as per the CPCSEA guidelines in standard polypropylene cage 3 to 4 animals per cage. Animal coding was done according to standard protocol 12 hours day and night cycle was maintained food and water was provided ad libitum.

Diabetes induced with Streptozotocin (STZ) 60 mg/kg and 110 mg/kg Nicotinamide intra-peritoneally. STZ was dissolved in 0.1 M of sodium citrate buffer, with a pH of 4.5. It was kept in ice box during the use. Blood sugar levels (BSL) were measured 12 hourly. Rats showing BSL > 250 mg/dl after 48 hours were included in the study and animals were randomly allocated to different experimental groups.

Groups

Gr I: Control –Saline Treated

Gr II: DM Control- Saline Treated

Gr III: Nishamalaki Prophylactic (0.9 gm/kg)

(Nishamalaki started from day 0 after administration of STZ)

Gr IV: Nishamalaki Therapeutic (0.9 gm/kg)

(Nishamalaki given after development of Renal dysfunction)

Gr V: Enalapril (25 mg/kg)

Drug treatment of the prophylactic group started immediately after administration of STZ while remaining rats received no treatment till the development of renal dysfunction. After 8 weeks, renal dysfunction was confirmed with serum creatinine and BUN (Blood Urea Nitrogen).

Ayurvedic Formulation-consisting of Emblica officinalis (amla), Curcuma longa and honey was used for the study. Identification & Authentication of the rhizomes of curcuma longa and amla was done in Ayurvedic college of Bharati Vidyapeeth. Preparation was done as per the ayurvedic literature and standards compared with Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia of India [19]. All the animals were treated with the test drug and standard drug according to groups.

Drug treatment was given as per group for 30 days.

Eyes were examined for the developmental changes of Cataract. Grading was done for initiation, progression and maturation of lenticular opacity as follows [20].

Stage 0 – Clear lenses and no vacuoles present.

Stage 1 – Vacuoles cover approximately one-half of the surfaces of the anterior pole forming a sub capsular cataract.

Stage 2 – Some vacuoles have disappeared and the cortex exhibits a hazy opacity.

Stage 3 – A hazy cortex remains and dense nuclear opacity is present.

Stage 4 – A mature cataract is observed as a dense opacity in both cortex and nucleus [21].

Blood sample were collected-from retro-orbital plexus for biochemical analysis. Blood glucose was monitored initially for seven days after STZ injection and then once fortnightly to check for maintenance of hyperglycaemia. Parameters measured were - BSL, Creatinine & BUN. The duration required to development of diabetic complications was detected.

Rats were sacrificed on day 90 and kidney samples were collected. Histopathological analysis of kidney was done.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Analysis was done with Graph pad Prism 6. ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test was used for analysis. The p<0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Blood glucose levels were elevated in all the groups after the injection of STZ except control. Rise in the BSL maintained throughout the study in diabetic control group. Prophylactic treatment significantly reduced (p<0.01) blood glucose in Group III compared to DM-Control. However, there was no significant change in BSL was seen in Enalapril treated group.

Serum Creatinine was also found to be increased significantly (p<0.01) in diabetic control group compared to control rats. Nishamalaki treatment significantly (p<0.01) reduced the elevated level of serum creatinine in diabetic rats from both therapeutic and prophylactic group. Though not significant, prophylactic treatment was more effective and showed the more promising results. [Table/Fig-1] shows the Creatinine & BUN levels in different groups of rats. Serum BUN levels were found to be increased significantly (p<0.001) in diabetic rats as compared to normal control rats. Treatment with Nishamalaki significantly (p<0.001) reduced the increased level of BUN in diabetic rats of Nishamalaki group when compared with diabetic control.

Biochemical analysis in blood

GroupsCreatinineBUN
I-Control0.66 ± 0.0324.46 ± 1.40
II-DM1.36 ± 0.08$$69.11 ±4.3$$$
III-Niasamalaki (Prophylactic)0.80 ± 0.02**26.57 ±1.01***
IV-Nizhamalaki0.83 ± 0.02**29.35 ±1.01***
V-Enalapril0.91 ± 0.03**31.26 ±1.02***

Comparison with control $$ p<0.01, $$$ p<0.001, Comparison with DM**p<0.001 & **p<0.001


Onset and Progression of Cataract: In control rats no cataract was developed, whereas in Diabetic control group cataract development started early and at the end of the study cataract was seen in all the rats [Table/Fig-2]. Two lenses were in stage 1&2, 7 lenses were in stage 3 and 3 lenses were in stage 4 from DM control group. In Prophylactic group 9 lenses were normal, 2 lenses were in stage 1and one lens was in stage 2. In Nishamalaki therapeutic group 5 lenses were normal, 4 lenses were in stage 1 and 3 lenses were with stage 2. In Enalpril group 2 lenses were normal, 5 lenses were in stage1,4 lenses were in stage 2, 1 lens was in stage3 [Table/Fig-3].

Rats from different groups showing development of Cataract.

Effect on progression of diabetic cataract.

Group wise development of Cataract-

Weeks12345678
Initiation-Gr II---Gr VGr IVGr III
Mature---Gr II----

Diabetic control -Gr. II: Cataract development started- 2th week, matured- end of 4th week.

Cataract development- Delayed in all treated groups, maximum in NA prophylactic (Gr III)- 8th week.

These results clearly indicate that treatment with Nishamalaki delayed progression of hyperglycaemia-induced cataract. Numbers of mature cataract lenses were significantly decreased in test groups in comparison with DM control group.

Histopathological Findings: The diabetic rats pathological changes were evident in the glomerulus with tubular injury as compared to normal rats. Pharmacological treatment with Nishamalaki prevented the diabetes-induced pathological changes in kidney. Rats on Nishamalaki showed near normal structures of renal tubules and no vacuolations.

Discussion

Prolonged hyperglycaemia leads to long term changes in stable macromolecules ending up in diabetic complications [22]. Cellular changes responsible for complications discovered so far are increased flux through polyol pathway, Production of advanced glycation end products, protein kinase activation and increased hexosamine pathway activity [Table/Fig-4] [23].

Consequences of hyperglycaemia.

STZ is a pancreatic cell toxin that induces rapid and irreversible necrosis of cells [24]. STZ in the dose 60-250mg/kg, body weight has been demonstrated to induce complete destruction of cells in most species within 24 hour [25], Rapid development of diabetes which many times resembles to Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Addition of Nicotinamide helps to preserve some pancreatic cells and gives the appearance of type 2 diabetes which is a well known model of Type 2 diabetes.

Creatinine & BUN were reduced significantly in NA treated group, more marked effect was seen in prophylactic group showing protective action. These results are consistent with the study of Sharma et al., showing antioxidant action of curcumin responsible for the protective effect in-nephropathy [26] and the raised level of serum creatinine and urea nitrogen in the aged rats were decreased following the administration of E. officinalis extract and reduced age related renal dysfunction by oxidative stress in rats [27] Kasabari et al., showed E. officinalis insulin mimetic effect and also demonstrated inhibitory effects on α-amylase and α-glucosidase [28]. Curcuma has got protective role when used prophylactically and protects islets against streptozotocin-induced oxidative stress by scavenging free radicals effectively rescue islets from damage with no effect on normal cell function [29].

Nishamalaki delayed maturation of diabetic cataract due to slow progression. Although onset of cataract due to STZ-induced hyperglycaemia was not affected, progression and maturation were delayed significantly in a prophylactic and therapeutic Nishamalaki group. The protective effect was even more pronounced with prophylactic group. Our findings about the cataract development in Nishamalaki are consistent with the Suryanarayana et al., that turmeric delays STZ-induced cataract [30,31].

Histopathology of kidney showed tubular cell necrosis, tubular lumen dilation, foci of denuded basement membrane, vacuolization, pyknotic nuclei in diabetic group. With NA & Enalapril, near normal glomerular and tubular structures compared with the shrunken glomerulus, tubular vacuolations in DM control group [Table/Fig-5a-e].

(a) Control group-Control group kidney showing normal structure of glomerulus (H & E 10X). (b) Diabetic control group-Glomerulo-sclerosis, tubular lesions and cellular infiltration. (c) Nishamalaki Prophylactic-showing reduced renal pathology. (d) Nishamalaki Therapeutic-showing reduced renal pathology. (e) Enalapril-showing reduced renal pathology.

Protective effect may be seen because of the synergistic combination of Curcuma Longa and Emblica officinalis contributing through [Table/Fig-6] possible different mechanisms like- increasing Insulin sensitivity, increasing Glucose Uptake, decreasing α glucosidase activity, decreasing Amylase activity, increasing Insulin release, decreasing Oxidative stress. Nishamalaki through multiple actions has showed protective effect against diabetic nephropathy and also prevented and delayed development of cataract. Thus, Nishamalaki appeared to be more useful in the prevention and treatment of diabetic complications.

Nishamalaki – Synergistic effect of combination.

Conclusion

Once the morphological alterations in diabetic nephropathy sets in, they are not reversible leading to end stage renal disease and same is true for the cataract leading to blindness. But better control of hyperglycaemia and reduction in oxidative stress delays the progression of complications. Nishamalaki showed protective effect on diabetic nephropathy & also delayed the progression of cataract in rats. Nishamalaki administration observed to be more effective in prophylactic groups. Dietary use of curcuma longa and Emblica officinalis show beneficial effects but the scientifically prepared formulations is definitely effective as alternative treatment strategies for prevention of diabetic nephropathy and development of cataract. In present study biochemical findings were supplemented by the histopathology observations. In the dose of 60 mg/kg streptozotocin, very rapid development of diabetes with high mortality was the limitation of study. For the assessment of exact duration of prophylactic use of drug administration, further studies are required with the animal model mimicking the diabetes development in the human i.e. low dose STZ and high fat high fructose.

Comparison with control $$ p<0.01, $$$ p<0.001, Comparison with DM**p<0.001 & **p<0.001

References

[1]Faried MA, Mansour FK, Zolfakar AS, El-Kholy WB, Experimentally induced diabetic keratopathy in albino rats and the possible protective role of ginger Journal of American Science 2013 9(12):206-12.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). “National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011.” Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 201 (2011)  [Google Scholar]

[3]Fowler MJ, Microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes Clin Diabetes 2011 29:116-22.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Sheetz Matthew J, King GL, Molecular understanding of hyperglycaemia’s adverse effects for diabetic complications JAMA 2002 288(20):2579-88.  [Google Scholar]

[5]van Dieren S, Beulens JW, van der Schouw YT, Grobbee DE, Neal B, The global burden of diabetes and its complications: an emerging pandemic European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation 2010 17(suppl1):s3-8.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Ritz E, Rychlík I, Locatelli F, Halimi S, End-stage renal failure in type 2 diabetes: a medical catastrophe of worldwide dimensions American Journal of Kidney Diseases 1999 34(5):795-808.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Peppa M, Vlassara H, Advanced glycation end products and diabetic complications: A General overview Hormones 2005 4:28-37.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Anitha TS, Annadurai T, Thomas PA, Geraldine P, Prevention of selenite-induced cataractogenesis by an ethanolic extract of Cineraria maritima: an experimental evaluation of the traditional eye medication Biological Trace Element Research 2011 143(1):425-36.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Raman R, Pal SS, Adams JS, Rani PK, Vaitheeswaran K, Sharma T, Prevalence and risk factors for cataract in diabetes. sankara nethralaya diabetic retinopathy epidemiology and molecular genetics study report no 17 Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010 51(12):6253-61.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Özkaya YG, The Role of Physical Exercise on Lipid Peroxidation in Diabetic Complications 2012 :595-600.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Dawane J, Pandit VA, Deshpande SS, Kuvalekar AA, Mandpe A, Wele A, Evaluation of anti-diabetic activity of Nishamlaki on streptozotocin induced type II diabetic rats International Journal of Phytomedicine 2014 6(4):595-600.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Rao G, Bhat S, Rao G, P. Bhat G, Effect of treatment with nishamalaki powder on glycaemic control and markers of erythrocyte oxidative stress in diabetic rats compared to troglitazone Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 2013 19(2):127-34.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Trujillo J, Chirino YI, Molina-Jijón E, Andérica-Romero AC, Tapia E, Pedraza-Chaverrí J, Renoprotective effect of the antioxidant curcumin: Recent findings Redox biology 2013 1(1):448-56.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Suryanarayana P, Krishnaswamy K, Reddy GB, Effect of curcumin on galactose-induced cataractogenesis in rats Mol Vis 2003 (9):223-30.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Maheshwari RK, Singh AK, Gaddipati J, Srimal RC, Multiple biological activities of curcumin: A short review Life sciences 2006 78(18):2081-87.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Akhtar MS, Ramzan A, Ali A, Ahmad M, Effect of Amla fruit (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) on blood glucose and lipid profile of normal subjects and type 2 diabetic patients International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 2011 62(6):609-16.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Bhandari PR, Kamdod MA, Emblica officinalis (Amla): A review of potential therapeutic applications International Journal of Green Pharmacy 2012 6(4):257  [Google Scholar]

[18]Suryanarayana P, Saraswat M, Petrash M, Reddy GB, Emblica officinalis and its enriched tannoids delay streptozotocin-induced diabetic cataract in rats Mol Vis 2007 13:1291-97.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Charak Samhita/ chikitsa sthan /Prameha Chikitsa Adhyaya, 6/289  [Google Scholar]

[20]Suryanarayana P, Saraswat M, Mrudula T, Prasanna Krishna T, Krishnaswamy K, Bhanuprakash Reddy G, Curcumin and turmeric delay streptozotocin-induced diabetic cataract in rats Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2005 46:2092-99.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Rathi SS, Prevention of experimental diabetic cataract by Indian Ayurvedic plant extracts Phytotherapy Research 2002 16(8):774-77.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Brownlee M, Glycation products and the pathogenesis of diabetic complications Diabetes Care 1992 15(12):1835-43.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Brownlee M, Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications Nature 2001 414(6865):813-20.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Arora S, Ojha SK, Vohora D, Characterisation of streptozotocin induced diabetes mellitus in Swiss albino mice Global J Pharmacol 2009 3(2):81-84.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Deeds MC, Anderson JM, Armstrong AS, Gastineau DA, Hiddinga HJ, Jahangir A, Single dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes: considerations for study design in islet transplantation models Laboratory Animals 2011 45(3):131-40.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Sharma S, Kulkarni SK, Chopra K, Curcumin, the active principle of turmeric (Curcuma longa), ameliorates diabetic nephropathy in rats Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 2006 33(10):940-45.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Yokozawa T, Kim HY, Kim HJ, Amla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) attenuates age-related renal dysfunction by oxidative stress J of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2007 55(19):7744-52.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Kasabri V, Flatt PR, Abdel-Wahab YH, Emblica officinalis stimulates the secretion and action of insulin and inhibits starch digestion and protein glycation in vitro European Journal of Medicinal Plants 2014 4(6):753  [Google Scholar]

[29]Meghana K, Sanjeev G, Ramesh B, Curcumin prevents streptozotocin-induced islet damage by scavenging free radicals: a prophylactic and protective role European Journal of Pharmacology 2007 577(1):183-91.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Suryanarayana P, Saraswat M, Mrudula T, Krishna TP, Krishnaswamy K, Reddy GB, Curcumin and turmeric delay streptozotocin-induced diabetic cataract in rats Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2005 46(6):2092-99.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Suryanarayana P, Satyanarayana A, Balakrishna N, Kumar PU, Reddy GB, Effect of turmeric and curcumin on oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat Medical Science Monitor 2007 13(12):BR286-92.  [Google Scholar]