JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Dentistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15727.7584
Year : 2016 | Month : Apr | Volume : 10 | Issue : 04 Full Version Page : ZC35 - ZC38

Evaluation of the Quality of Obturation with Obtura at Different Sizes of Apical Preparation Through Microleakage Testing

Rambabu Tanikonda1, Prasanthi N.V.D. Nalam2, Girija S. Sajjan3, B.H. Vijaya Lakshmi4, K. Madhu Varma5, R. Kalyan Satish6

1 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, GSL Dental College and Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India.
3 Professor and Head of Department, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
4 Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
5 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
6 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Prasanthi N.V.D. Nalam, Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, GSL Dental College and Hospital, Lakshmipuram, Rajahmundry-533296, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: prasanthi.nalam@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Obturation of the root canal system is required to prevent recontamination of the root canal after cleaning and shaping procedures and to seal the root canal completely, both the apical and coronal avenues of potential leakage and to maintain the disinfected status.

Aim

The aim of this study was to determine the microleakage by dye leakage method at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm short of the apex with different sizes of apical preparation, obturated by Obtura.

Materials and Methods

Sixty freshly extracted human single rooted teeth were randomly distributed into six equal groups. Group I (control group) was obturated by lateral compaction technique. Group II to VI were experimental groups (apical preparations done upto ISO sizes 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 respectively), obturated by Obtura technique. After storing the samples at 100% humidity for seven days and one day in 2% methylene blue, the roots of the teeth were divtioned at 3mm short of the apex. They were observed under stereomicroscope at 20X magnification and the images were analysed for microleakage using the scoring criteria. The data obtained were analysed by One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey pair-wise multiple comparison test and p ≤ 0.05 was considered as the level of significance.

Results

The lowest mean microleakage score was seen in Group VI (0) and the highest mean leakage score was seen in Group II (1.5). There was statistically significant difference between Group II and Group V (p = 0.044), Group II and Group VI (p = 0.013). There was no significant difference between all the other groups (p> 0.05).

Conclusion

Comparison of microleakage between different groups from ISO sizes 20-60 recommends a minimum apical preparation of ISO size 30.

Keywords

Introduction

Successful endodontic treatment depends upon the quality of root canal preparation, three dimensional obturation and the coronal restoration. Ingle found that among the endodontic failures, 60% were due to incomplete obturation of the root canal system [13]. So it is indispensable that the root canal filling should be three dimensional and result in fluid tight seal, particularly in the last few millimeters of the apical area [4].

Cold lateral compaction is the most widely used and considered to be the gold standard technique after being successfully tested [510]. Incomplete fusion of the gutta-percha cones, voids and lack of surface adaptation are the main drawbacks with this technique. Warm lateral compaction produces superior quality of obturation when compared to cold lateral compaction but does not simulate the canal anatomy in all situations [11,12]. Warm vertical compaction technique introduced by Herbert Schilder in 1967 could fill the accessory canals and canal ramifications. But the main drawbacks are that it takes longer time and the procedure is difficult to follow [13,14].

Yee et al., in 1977 has introduced a new technique that utilizes the thermoplasticized gutta-percha to flow and fill the root canal. This device has now evolved into Obtura III [15,16]. This technique proved to be better in replicating the canal anatomy. Apical extrusion, voids and lack of material control are found to be the main drawbacks [5]. There is lack of literature regarding the quality of obturation with Obtura at different sizes of apical preparation.

There are various methods of microleakage evaluation of which dye penetration method is simple and effective [17].

Aim

This study was designed to determine the apical microleakage after obturation with Obtura, at different sizes of apical preparation. The null hypothesis tested was that microleakage may not vary with different sizes of apical preparation after obturation with Obtura.

Materials and Methods

This invitro study was performed in 60 human single rooted teeth in patients of age group greater than 40 years that were extracted for periodontal reasons. The inclusion criteria were: teeth having single straight canals assessed radiographically, teeth with fully formed apices, absence of root caries, cracks, and structural defects. Teeth with wider canals radiographically (ISO size greater than 20) were excluded from the study. All the teeth were debrided and stored in deionized water containing thymol until use.

The teeth were decoronated upto cementoenamel junction. The working length was determined to be 1mm short of the radiographic apex. Teeth were distributed into six groups (n=10) randomly. Cleaning and shaping was done in all the groups by crowndown technique. Irrigation was done with 2ml of 3% sodium hypochlorite (Prime Dental Products Pvt. Ltd, Thane, India) after each instrumentation. Smear layer removal was done with 5ml of 17% EDTA and was used as the final irrigant (Prime Dental Products Pvt. Ltd, Thane, India).

Group I (Lateral compaction group): Apical preparation was done upto three sizes larger than the initial apical file (IAF). A standardized master gutta-percha cone (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) was selected, placed into the canal and checked for tugback. Obturation was done by lateral compaction technique using AH plus sealer.

Groups II to VI (Obtura groups): In groups II, III, IV and V apical preparations were done upto ISO sizes 20, 30, 40 and 50 with ProTaper rotary files F1, F3, F4 and F5 respectively (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). In group VI apical preparation was done upto protaper F5 followed by 60size K-file. Obtura system (Obtura Sparton, Fenton, Missouri, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Twenty three gauge needles were used for all the obturations and the tip was placed at 3-5mm short of the working length. AH plus sealer was applied to the canal walls. After heating the Obtura unit to 185oc the needle was placed at the desired length and injected passively. This procedure was done until gutta-percha was observed at the coronal portion of the root.

Radiographic assessment of obturations in all the groups was done to visualize the extension of gutta-percha. The coronal parts of the roots were restored with Type II Glass ionomer cement of 3mm thickness. Teeth were placed in 100% humidity for seven days to allow the sealer to set completely.

Leaving 3mm from the apical portion of the root, the remaining surface of the roots were painted with two coats of nail varnish and allowed to dry for one day. After drying, the specimens were placed in 2% methylene blue dye solution for one day. Then the specimens were removed and washed under running tap water to remove excess dye [4]. Transverse sectioning was done at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm short of the apex with diamond disc at slow speed and water coolant. Each section was sub divided into four regions by overlapping a cross frame. The presence of dye leakage was considered when assessing every section under stereomicroscope at 20X magnification.

The degree of dye leakage was scored as: Score 0: No dye leakage [Table/Fig-1a], Score 1: Dye leakage in any one region [Table/Fig-1b], Score 2: Dye leakage in any two regions [Table/Fig-1c], Score 3: Dye leakage in any three regions [Table/Fig-1d], Score 4: Dye leakage in all the four regions [Table/Fig-1e].

(a) Specimen showing score 0, (b) Specimen showing score 1, (c) Specimen showing score 2, (D) Specimen showing score 3, (e) Specimen showing score 4.

Statistical Analysis

The mean scores of microleakage were calculated and statistical analysis was done by Mann-Whitney U test to compare the microleakage between the groups. In the present study p ≤ 0.05 was considered as the level of significance.

Results

The lowest mean microleakage score was seen in Group VI (0) and the highest mean leakage score was seen in Group II (1.5) [Table/Fig-2]. There was statistically significant difference between Group II and Group V (p = 0.044), Group II and Group VI (p = 0.013). There was no significant difference between other groups (p > 0.05) [Table/Fig-3].

Leakage scores in different groups and One-way ANOVA.

GroupNo of SpecimensLeakage Scores
Score 0Score 1Score 2Score 3Score 4X*Mean ScoreOne-WayAnovap-value
GROUP I(Lateral compaction)108110030.30<0.05
GROUP II (ISO size 20)1050212151.50
GROUP III(ISO size 30)108110030.30
GROUP IV (ISO size 40)107110030.30
GROUP V(ISO size 50)109010020.20
GROUP VI (ISO size 60)1010000000.00

*The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. Statistically significant values are in bold


Tukey pair wise multiple comparison test to determine the significant difference in microleakage between groups.

Dependent variableMean Difference (I-J)Std. Errorp-value95% Confidence Interval
Lower BoundUpper Bound
Group III.00000.396281.000-2.3708-.0292
III.00000.396281.000-1.17081.1708
IV.00000.396281.000-1.17081.1708
V.10000.396281.000-1.07081.2708
VI.30000.396280.973-.87081.4708
GroupIII.00000.396281.000.02922.3708
III1.20000*.396280.042.02922.3708
IV1.20000*.396280.042.02922.3708
V1.30000*.396280.021.12922.4708
VI1.50000*.396280.005.32922.6708
GroupIIII.00000.396281.000-1.17081.1708
II.10000.396281.000-2.3708-.0292
IV.00000.396281.000-1.17081.1708
V.10000.396281.000-1.07081.2708
VI.30000.396280.973-.87081.4708
GroupIVI.00000.396281.000-1.17081.1708
II.00000.396281.000-2.3708-.0292
III.00000.396281.000-1.17081.1708
V.10000.396281.000-1.07081.2708
VI.30000.396280.973-.87081.4708
GroupVI-.10000.396281.000-1.27081.0708
II-1.30000*.396280.021-2.4708-.1292
III-.10000.396281.000-1.27081.0708
IV-.10000.396281.000-1.27081.0708
VI.20000.396280.996-.97081.3708
GroupVII-.30000.396280.973-1.4708.8708
II-1.50000*.396280.005-2.6708-.3292
III-.30000.396280.973-1.4708.8708
IV-.30000.396280.973-1.4708.8708
V-.20000.396280.996-1.3708.9708

*The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. Statistically significant values are in bold


Discussion

All the procedures in this study were performed by a single operator to reduce the variability in results. Microleakage evaluation is routinely done by dye leakage method, fluid filtration method or bacterial leakage method. The other methods include scanning electron microscope, radioisotopes, neutron activation analysis, markers and chemical agents [17]. The dye penetration method permits comparison of the apical leakage in two or more groups under identical experimental conditions [4]. Among the various organic dyes available; methylene blue was used because it had a particle size of 120A°, which was less than the average size of bacteria (2,000A°) [17]. So it is possible to determine the leakage where even bacteria cannot penetrate. Because of the high penetrating ability of methylene blue it is the most commonly used dye in Endodontics [4]. Hence it was used in the present study.

Cold lateral condensation is the most widely practised obturation technique because of its advantages like controlled placement of gutta-percha in the root canal and ease of use [18]. It also serves as a standard with which other obturation techniques could be compared. Hence it was used in the present study [19,20].

Obtura III is an injectable thermoplasticized obturation technique that is found to be superior to lateral condensation technique as it has better adaptation to the root canal system, reduces the procedure time, reduces the patient discomfort and has accurate temperature control for precise consistent viscosity [15]. The main drawback of this technique is its inability to control apical extrusion of the softened gutta-percha [5].

The results of the present study showed that there was no statistically significant difference in leakage between cold lateral compaction group and Obtura group (p > 0.05). Similar results were reported by Kandaswamy et al., Kavitha et al., and Emmanuel. Kandaswamy et al., evaluated the invitro apical micro leakage between Thermafil, Obtura II and Cold lateral condensation. They concluded that the microleakage was similar in lateral compaction and Obtura groups (p> 0.05) [5].

Kavitha et al., compared the sealing ability of lateral compaction, Obtura and Gutta Flow group. They concluded that Obtura II technique and lateral compaction techniques showed similar microleakage (p> 0.05) [1].

Emmanuel et al., compared the apical sealing ability of three different obturation techniques-Lateral Condensation, Obtura II and Thermafil by microleakage evaluation and concluded that lateral condensation showed maximum mean apical dye penetration in all the three groups with no significant difference (p > 0.05) when compared to Obtura [21].

In all the above studies Obtura groups showed dye leakage similar to lateral condensation groups with no significant difference. The beta phase gutta-percha which has high melting temperature (165-200°c) and greater shrinkage upon cooling might be the reason for microleakage in Obtura group. In all these studies microleakage evaluations were done between different obturation techniques by standardizing the apical preparations to a given ISO size of either 40, 50 or 60 and were not done at different apical sizes, whereas in the present study microleakage evaluation was done at different apical preparations using a single obturation technique.

According to Guttman et al., the recommended apical canal enlargement was ISO sizes 20-60 for Obtura [22]. This statement was given based on the clinical experience of authors rather than sound scientific research. Further studies were not done to substantiate their results. Hence in the present study microleakage evaluation was done at different sizes of apical preparation after obturation with Obtura.

Results of the present study showed that the microleakage was maximum in Group II (ISO size 20). This may be because the gutta-percha might not flow into such a narrow sized apical preparation.

Results also showed that microleakage though present was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) in Groups I, III, IV and V. This may be because of the beta phase gutta-percha which has high melting temperature and greater shrinkage upon cooling that led to microleakage in the groups III, IV and V whereas group I (lateral compaction group) showed microleakage due to the lack of close adaptability of gutta-percha cones to the canal walls.

Based on the Hagen-Poiseuille equation the flow rate of a semi-solid can be measured by:

Ø= ¶R4/8n (ΔP/ΔX)

Ø is the volumetric flow rate

‘n’ is the dynamic fluid viscosity

‘P’ is the pressure difference between two ends

‘X’ is the distance in the direction of flow

Pressure difference and dynamic fluid viscosity affect the flow rate, however they could not be measured.

From this equation it can be understood that flow rate is directly proportional to the radius of the root canal. So this would be one reason why more microleakage was seen in group II where apical preparation was done up to ISO size 20 when compared to other experimental groups.

Limitation

Limitations of this study were: that study was conducted only in single rooted teeth with single straight canals and only 23 gauge Obtura needles which had an inner diameter of 0.33mm were included in the study.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this invitro study it can be concluded that comparison of microleakage between different groups from ISO sizes 20-60 recommends a minimum apical preparation of ISO size 30. Further studies in larger samples including teeth with different canal configurations are required to simulate a clinical scenario.

*The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. Statistically significant values are in bold*The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. Statistically significant values are in bold

References

[1]Kavitha A, Anil Kumar G, Evaluation and comparison of sealing ability of three different obturation techniques - Lateral condensation, Obtura II, and GuttaFlow: An in vitro study J Conserv Dent 2011 14(1):57-63.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC, Endodontics 2008 5th edConnecticutPeople’s Medical Publishing House:571-75.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Dow RP, Ingle JI, Isotope determination of root canal failure Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Endod 1955 8:1100-04.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Robberecht L, Thomas C, Anne CC, Qualitative evaluation of two endodontic obturation techniques: tapered single-cone method versus warm vertical condensation and injection system-An in vitro study J Oral Sci 2012 54(1):99-104.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Rajeswari P, Gopi Krishna V, Kandaswamy D, Invitro evaluation of apical micro leakage of Thermafil and Obtura heated gutta-percha in comparison with cold lateral condensation using fluid filtration system Endodontol 2006 8:24-32.  [Google Scholar]

[6]De Moor RJG, Martens LC, Apical microleakage after lateral condensation, hybrid gutta-percha condensation and soft core obturation: an invitro evaluation Endod Dent Traumatol 1999 15:239-43.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Hall EM, The mechanics of root canal treatment J Am Dent Assoc 1930 17:88-108.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Tom GG, Richard MS, Riehm J, Effect of spreader and accessory cone size on density of obturation using conventional or mechanical lateral condensation J Endod 2001 27(5):358-62.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Ahmed GS, Raghad AM, A comparative study of the sealing ability of two different obturation techniques with and without the use of sealers J Bagh Coll Dentistry 2008 20(1):5-7.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Peak JD, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM, The outcome of root canal treatment: A retrospective study within the armed forces. (Royal Air Forces) Br Dent J 2001 190:140-44.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Liewehr FR, Kulild JC, Primack PD, Improved density of gutta-percha after warm lateral condensation J Endod 1993 19:489-91.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Jake C, Mary PW, James K, Charles L, A comparison of three gutta-percha obturation techniques to replicate canal irregularities J Endod 2006 32:762-65.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Goldberg F, Artaza LP, De Silvio A, Effectiveness of different obturation techniques in the filling of simulated lateral canals J Endod 2001 27:362-64.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Reader CM, Himel VT, Germain LP, Hoen MM, Effect of three obturation techniques on the filling of lateral canals and the main canal J Endod 1993 19:404-08.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Jose LI, Russell KR, Michael SH, James HH, Kenneth IK, Evaluation of three methods of obturation using the obtura II system Braz J Oral Sci 2002 1(3):126-29.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Samer A, Hussain F, The adaptability of three different gutta-percha obturation techniques: Thermafil, System-B/Obtura, lateral condensation J Bagh Coll Dentistry 2010 22(3):39-45.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Yavuz I, Aydin AH, New method for measurement of surface areas of microleakage at the primary teeth by biomolecule characteristics of methylene blue Biotechnol. & Biotechnol. Eq 2005 19:181-88.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Clarissa TR, Renata PH, Celso K, Filling of simulated lateral canals using different obturation techniques: analysis through IDA digital radiograph system RSBO 2012 9(3):254-59.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Gound TG, Riehm RJ, Makkawy HA, Oldgaard EC, A description of an alternative method of lateral condensation and a comparison of the ability to obturate canals using mechanical or traditional lateral condensation J Endod 2000 26(12):756-59.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Kersten HW, Evaluation of three thermoplasticized gutta-percha filling techniques using a leakage model in vitro Int Endod J 1988 21:353-60.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Emmanuel S, Shantaram K, Sushil KC, An invitro evaluation and comparison of apical sealing ability of three different obturation techniques J Int Oral Health 2013 5(2):35-43.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Gutmann JL, Rakusin H, Perspectives on root canal obturation with thermoplasticized gutta-percha Int Endod J 1987 20:261-70.  [Google Scholar]