JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Dermatology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16142.7138
Year : 2016 | Month : Jan | Volume : 10 | Issue : 01 Full Version Page : WC01 - WC03

A Retrospective Study of the Pattern of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Males: Viral Infections in Emerging Trend

Murugan Swamiappan1, Vijayabhaskar Chandran2, Prathyusha Prabhakar3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Skin and STD, Chengalpattu Medical College & Hospital, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Skin and STD, Chengalpattu Medical College & Hospital, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Junior Resident, Department of Skin and STD, Chengalpattu Medical College & Hospital, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Murugan Swamiappan, Assistant Professor, Department of Skin and Std, GST Road, Chengalpattu Medical College & Hospital, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu – 603001, India. E-mail : murugandvl@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) continue to be a major public health problem with significant burden on the society even after so many health care programmes being organized by the governmental and non-governmental organizations and awareness created among general public about STIs. Male patients are common visitors to STI clinic than females who are generally traced as a contact in our society.

Aim

The aim of this study was to give an overview of the pattern of STIs among males at a tertiary care teaching hospital over a period of 5 years.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective chart review of the data collected from the clinical records of all male patients, who had attended the STI clinic of Chengalpattu Medical College Hospital, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, for various complaints during the 5 year period from 2010 to 2014 was carried out. All male patients with confirmed STIs were included in the study and those patients without any evidence of STIs either clinically or serologically were excluded from the study.

Results

Out of the 4454 male cases who had attended the STI clinic, 175 (3.93%) patients had STIs. Genital wart accounted for the maximum number among the STIs with 61 cases (34.86%), followed by genital herpes 56 (32%), urethral discharge 19(10.86%), non-herpetic genital ulcerative diseases 17(9.71%) and serological test for syphilis (RPR) was reactive in 22 (12.57%) patients. HIV was positive in 68 (1.53%) among the total 4454 male patients attended the clinic.

Conclusion

Viral STIs occur significantly more than the bacterial STIs because of its incurable and recurrent nature. Health programmes should be still more focused on creating awareness about the minor STIs and to remove the stigma so that the patients attend the proper health care facilities in the early stage itself for treatment thereby, complications and further transmission of the STIs can be avoided.

Keywords

Introduction

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are loosely defined constellation of infections and syndromes that are epidemiologically heterogeneous but all of which are almost always or at least often transmitted through sexual route [1]. In the present scenario there is a considerable decline in the major STIs like syphilis and gonorrhoea, chancroid is almost on the verge of disappearance [2] and STIs like lymphogranuloma venereum and donovanosis are rarely seen. The common problems among male STI clinic attendees include balanoposthitis, non-venereal genital dermatoses, sexual dysfunction and venereophobia. Vaginal cervical discharge was the common problem in females and in that endogenous infections like vulvovaginal candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis were frequently seen. In females, STIs occur particularly in the core group people like female sex workers and among the general population, it mainly occurs through their spouses particularly in the rural and semi-urban areas. Various epidemiological studies had reported a diminishing prevalence of bacterial STIs and a rising trend in viral STIs [3-11].

Aim

The aim of the study was to give an overview of the pattern of STIs among the male patients who had attended the STI clinic at a tertiary care teaching hospital for various complaints over a period of 5 years.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective chart review of the data collected from the clinical records of all male patients who had attended the STI clinic of Chengalpattu Medical College Hospital, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, for various complaints during the 5 year period from 2010 to 2014 was carried out. In this study all the patients who had either clinical evidence of STIs as per the NACO’s syndromic management guidelines [12] or serological evidence of STIs were included. Patients who had visited the STI clinic with problems like sexual dysfunction, prostatorrhea, spermatorrhea, phimosis, paraphimosis, non-venereal genital dermatoses like pearly penile papule and who did not have any evidence of STIs were excluded from the study. All patients were clinically evaluated by qualified venereologists, details of the epidemiological features i.e., age, marital status, sexual behaviour etc. were recorded and diagnosis were made based on the clinical history, examination and available lab tests. Serological tests for syphilis (Rapid plasma reagin –RPR) and rapid tests for HIV were done for all patients after counseling. Gram stain was done for urethral discharge and for genital ulcer Tzanck smear and Gram stain were done. Darkfield examination was not done due to non-availability. STIs were categorized in different syndromes as depicted by National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) in the syndromic management of STIs. Syndromic management was given as per NACO guidelines [12].

Results

The total number of male patients attended the STI clinic were 4454 during the study period of 5 years from 2010 to 2014. Among that STIs were seen 175 (3.93%) cases and 68 (1.53%) were found to be HIV positive [Table/Fig-1,2].

Year wise distribution of male cases attended the STI clinic.

YearTotal number of casesGenital herpesGenital wartGenital ulcerative diseases- Non-HerpeticUrethral dischargeRPR- reactiveHIV - positive
201089991235420
2011812161125415
201275511123398
201371291353313
20141276111343212
Total4454566117192268

Total number of STI and HIV cases among males.

YearTotal number of STI clinic attendees - malesSTI casesHIV
201089933 (3.67%)20 (2.2%)
201181238 (4.68%)15 (1.85%)
201275538(5.03%)8 (1.05%)
201371233 (4.63%)13 (1.83%)
2014127633 (2.59%)12(0.94%)
Total4454175 (3.93%)68 (1.53%)

The remaining patients had visited the STI clinic for candidial balanoposthitis, normal skin variants like pearly penile papules and other non-venereal genital dermatoses, sexual dysfunction, venereophobia and for screening.

The occurence of STIs was found to be common in the age group 25 to 44. Promiscuous behaviour was present among the patients with STIs but few patients denied it.

Among the 175 patients who had STIs, genital warts was common followed by genital herpes. Genital wart was seen in 61 (34.86%), genital herpes in 56 (32%), VDRL reactive syphilis (latent and secondary syphilis) in 22 (12.57%), urethral discharge in 19 (10.86%) and non-herpetic genital ulcerative diseases in 17 (9.71%) patients [Table/Fig-3]. Lymphogranuloma venereum and donovanosis was not seen during the study period.

Number of STI cases in males during the 5 year period.

GUD- HerpeticGUD-Non herpeticUrethral DischargeGenital wartRPR reactiveTotal
56 (32%)17 (9.71%)19(10.86%)61(34.86%)22(12.57%)175 (100%)

Among the 68 HIV positive patients, seven patients had genital herpes, six patients had genital wart, one patient had primary chancre and in seven patients RPR was found to be reactive.

During the five year study period the total number of STI cases was found to occur at a constant rate (33 to 38 cases) every year. This consistency was also observed among various STIs [Table/Fig-1,2].

Discussion

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) remain a major public health challenge. There is substantial progress in preventing, diagnosing and treating STIs because of the various programmes by NACO and other non-governmental organizations but new infections keep occurring at a constant rate. In addition to the physical and psychological consequences of STIs, these diseases also lead to a tremendous financial burden in the country.

World health organization had estimated that more than one million acquire a sexually transmitted infection (STI) every day. Every year an estimated 500 million people become ill with one of the four STIs: Chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis and trichomoniasis. More than 530 million people have herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV2) and more than 290 million women have human papilloma virus (HPV) infection [13].

In India around 6% of adult population has one or more STI/RTI (Reproductive tract infection) which amounts to occurrence of about 30-35 million episodes of STI/RTI every year [2].

Even though, the estimated burden of STIs are so high, stigmatization at the individual and community levels results in reluctance of the patient to seek early treatment. Patients prefer to seek treatment in the private sector provided either by qualified or traditional practitioners who are perceived to offer greater accessibility and confidentiality and to be less stigmatizing than public sector facilities. Stigma also leads to difficulty in partner notification and treatment [14].

A number of epidemiological studies have been done on the pattern and changing trends of STIs in India. Studies which were carried out in the past by Narayanan B, Jaiswal AK et al., and Nair TG et al., have shown an increased prevalence of bacterial STIs [15-17].

Viral STIs, genital wart and genital herpes was the commonest STIs seen in this study which is comparable to the other studies done in the recent years by Vora et al., Devi et al., Jain et al., Chandragupta et al., and Choudhry et al [10,18-21]. Marked decline in bacterial STIs, resulting in an apparent increase in the viral STIs has been reported from various other Indian studies [3,5,7,8].

The low prevalence of bacterial STIs seen could be attributed to the better diagnostic and management facilities at the primary care itself, broad spectrum antibiotics, empirical treatment provided by general practitioners and the syndromic management advocated by the National AIDS control organization (NACO). The high prevalence seen in viral STIs is due to the recurrent and persistent nature of the disease which drives the patient to the tertiary care centre after the initial consultations at the primary care level.

Conclusion

Viral STIs occur significantly more than the bacterial STIs because of its incurable and recurrent nature. Health programmes should be still more focused on creating awareness about the minor STIs and to remove the stigma so that the patients attend the proper health care facilities in the early stage itself for treatment thereby, complications and further transmission of the STIs can be avoided.

References

[1]Marfatia YS, Sharma A, Joshipura SP, Overview of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. In: Valia RG, Valia AR, editors IADVL Textbook of Dermatology 2008 Vol.593rd edMumbaiBhalani Publishing House:1766-78.  [Google Scholar]

[2]National Guidelines on Prevention, Management and Control of Reproductive Tract Infections and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Department of AIDS Control, Maternal Health Division, NACO, Ministry of Health and Family welfare. New Delhi: Government of India; 2014. pp.2  [Google Scholar]

[3]Mohanty J, Das KB, Mishra C, Clinical profile of sexual transmitted diseases in Cuttack Indian J DermatolVenereol Leprol 1995 61:143-44.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Arakal GK, Damarla SV, Kasetty HK, Chintagunta SR, Changing trends in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic attendees –Current scenario Int J Med Sci Public Health 2014 3(10):1215-18.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Hassan I, Anwar P, Rather S, Sameem F, Majid I, Jabeen Y, Pattern of sexually transmitted infections in a Muslim majority region of North India Indian J Sex Transm Dis 2015 36:30-34.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Karn D, Amatya A, Aryal ER, KCS Timalsina M, Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections in a Tertiary Care Centre Kathmandu Univ Med J 2011 34(2):44-48.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Sarkar S, Shrimal A, Das J, Choudhury SR, Pattern of Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Profile from a Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic of a Tertiary Care Hospital of Eastern India Ann Med Health Sci Res 2013 3(2):206-09.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Thappa DM, Singh S, Singh A, HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases in a referral centre in south India Sex Trans Infect 1999 75:191  [Google Scholar]

[9]Thappa DM, Kaimal S, Sexually transmitted infections in India: Current status (except human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) Indian J Dermatol 2007 52:78-82.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Vora R, Anjaneyan G, Doctor C, Gupta R, Clinico-epidemiological study of sexually transmitted infections in males at a rural-based tertiary care center Indian J Sex Transm Dis 2011 32:86-89.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Gyawalee M, Pokhrel DB, Pattern of sexually transmitted infections and sexual behaviour in patients with genital symptoms NJDVL 2014 12(1):20-27.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Operational guidelines forProgramme Managers and Service Providers for Strengthening STI/RTI services, National AIDS Control Organization, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. New Delhi: Government of India; 2007. p.18  [Google Scholar]

[13]World Health Organization. Sexually Transmitted Infections. Fact sheets no. 110. Updated on Nov 2013. Cited on July 22 2015. www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en  [Google Scholar]

[14]World health organization. Global strategy for the prevention and control of sexually transmitted infections:2006-2015. 2007; pp.13. Available from: www.who.int/hiv/pub/toolkits/stis_strategy[1]en.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[15]Narayanan B, A retrospective study of the pattern of sexually transmitted diseases during a ten-year period Indian J Dermatol Venereol 2005 71:333-37.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Jaiswal AK, Banerjee S, Matety AR, Grover S, Changing trends in sexually transmitted diseases in North Eastern India Indian J DermatolVenereol 2002 68:65-66.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Nair TG, Asha LK, Leelakumari PV, An epidemiological study of sexually transmitted diseases Indian J DermatolVenereolo Leprol 2000 66:69-72.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Devi SA, Vetrichevvel TP, Pise GA, Thappa DM, Pattern of sexually transmitted infections in a tertiary care centre at Puducherry Indian J Dermatol 2009 54:347-49.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Jain VK, Dayal S, Aggarwal K, Jain S, Changing trends of sexually transmitted diseases at Rohtak Indian J Sex Trans Dis 2008 29:23-25.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Chandragupta TS, Badri SR, Murty SV, Swarnakumari G, Prakash BVS, Changing trends of sexually transmitted diseases at Kakinada Indian J Sex Transm Dis 2007 28:6-9.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Choudhry S, Ramachandran VG, Das S, Bhattacharya SN, Mogha NS, Pattern of sexually transmitted infections and performance of syndromic management against etiological diagnosis in patients attending the sexually transmitted infections clinic of a tertiary care hospital Indian J Sex Transm Dis 2010 31:104-08.  [Google Scholar]