Paediatrics Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14876.6845
Year : 2015 | Month : Nov | Volume : 9 | Issue : 11 Page : SC25 - SC30

Clinical Profile and Chemotherapy Response in Children with Hodgkin Lymphoma at a Tertiary Care Centre

Rachna Seth1, Rashmi Ranjan Das2, Kirti Puri3, Prashant Singh4

1 Additional Professor, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India.
3 Intern, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
4 Intern, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.

NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Rachna Seth, Additional Professor, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi – 110029, India.


Optimal treatment strategy in children with advance stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) still remains controversial.


To evaluate the clinical profile and the efficacy of chemotherapy (CT) as a treatment modality in paediatric HL.

Material and Methods

Retrospective case record evaluation of paediatric HL cases over 5 years (October 2005 to October 2010) period.


Thirty five cases (31 boys) with a median age of eight years were studied. 24 cases were <10-year-old, and 23 had late stage disease (stage III to IV). B-symptoms were present in 60%, bulky mediastinal disease in 25.7%, and spleen involvement in 60% cases. None had bone marrow involvement. Most common histological type was nodular sclerosis (28.6%). Most cases received ABVD/COPP or ABVD regimen. Two cases needed BEACOPP due to progressive disease, and 4 needed low-dose involved field radiotherapy (RT). At a mean (SD) extended event-free follow-up of 42.7(±17.1) months, four cases relapsed (one was lost to follow-up, and three were treated with chemotherapy and low-dose involved field RT). None died due to the disease.


Present study found systemic CT alone to be an effective therapy in childhood Hodgkin lymphoma. However, a small sample in present study limits the generalisability of these findings. The findings needs to be replicated in larger population, preferably randomized clinical trials, before any firm conclusion can be made.


Optimal treatment strategy in children with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) remains controversial, especially in cases of advanced disease. Treatment modalities have varied from total nodal radiation therapy (RT) to Combined Chemo–Radiotherapy (CMT) and to Chemotherapy (CT) alone [14]. For the last two decades, CMT regimens using less toxic CT and low dose local RT has been the treatment modality preferred by most paediatric study groups. The aim is to minimize late complications of treatment while maintaining high cure rates [59], with 5-year Overall Survival (OS) rates >95%, and 5-year EFS (event free survival) > 90%. More recently, there is a tendency to use CT alone, particularly in younger children, so as to avoid long-term sequelae due to RT, especially premature epiphyseal fusion and secondary malignancies [10,11]. We analysed the OS as well as EFS of all stages of childhood HL treated with chemotherapy as per our unit protocol, using cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or alternating cycles of COPP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) and ABVD.

Materials and Methods

All children <13 years age diagnosed with HL on biopsy presenting to our centre during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Those with concurrent HIV infection, any pre-existing severe organ (kidney, liver, cardiac, cerebral) dysfunction were excluded.

Disease Staging

The pretreatment evaluation included a detailed patient history and physical examination. Routine laboratory studies including Complete Blood Cell Count (CBC) with differentials (DLC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), renal and liver function tests (RFTs and LFTs), serum uric acid, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level were obtained for all children before treatment. All patients had undergone chest x-ray (CXR), bone marrow aspiration/biopsy (except in stage IA - IIA), contrast enhanced Computerized Tomography Scan (CECT) of chest, abdomen and pelvis. PET scan was done whenever there was a discordance between CT findings and clinical and laboratory presentation, or a concern of CT overestimating disease extent due to inflammation and fibrosis. Lymphangiogram, gallium scan and staging laparotomy were not done in any of our subjects. Splenic involvement was defined as clinically detectable splenomegaly or presence of single or multiple hypodense lesions on abdominal CECT or presence of single or multiple hypoechoic splenic lesions on ultrasound examination of the abdomen. Clinical staging was determined according to the Ann-Arbor Classification [12]. Bulky disease was defined as presence of lymph nodal mass of at least 6 cm diameter or a mediastinal mass with a diameter exceeding one third of the maximum intrathoracic cavity width on an upright postero-anterior chest radiograph. Patients were histologically classified according to the Ryes modification of Lukes and Butler scheme [13].

Treatment Protocol

After staging workup, all patients with early stage disease (I-II) were stratified into favourable and unfavourable groups, based on B-symptoms and bulky disease. Early stage favourable patients (IA, IIA) received 2-4 cycles of ABVD (with or without involved field RT of 20-30Gy), and early stage unfavourable patients (IB, IIB) were treated as advanced disease and received 4 cycles of ABVD (with or without involved field RT). All patients with late stage disease (stage III and higher) received 6 cycles of ABVD (with or without involved field RT). Severity of disease was defined to include those of early stage unfavourable disease (stage IB, IIB) and late stage disease (stage (III to IV).

Clinical Re-Staging

Patients were reassessed for response after 2-4 cycles of ABVD, by a detailed physical examination, blood investigations, tissue examination from any new lymph nodes and repeat CT scan of the original site of involvement. PET scan was done if there was discordance between CT findings and clinical presentation, or a concern of CT overestimating disease extent due to inflammation and fibrosis.

Complete Remission (CR) was defined as the complete regression of clinical and radiological lesions. Persistence of some radiological abnormalities at the site of previous disease, such as minimal mediastinal widening, was considered as unconfirmed CR until close surveillance showed absence of increase of the radiological abnormalities. Partial Remission (PR) was defined as the reduction in all disease sites by at least 50% compared with the initial involvement. Disease progression was defined as increase by ≥25% of at least one measurable lesion, or by the appearance of a new lesion. In case of complete remission, two more cycles of chemotherapy were given. PR was treated with two cycles of chemotherapy, followed by re-evaluation. Localized residual disease was treated with involved field RT, and widespread residual disease was treated with high dose CT (BEACOPP). In case of non responsive or progressive disease, histopathology was reviewed, and high dose CT followed by stem cell transplant was considered.

Assessment of Outcome and Toxicity

When a patient was lost to follow-up, the time of most recent follow-up examination was used. Variables assessed were – complete response (CR) after four cycles, Partial Response (PR) or relapse (REL), development of secondary malignancy, and death. Measurements of growth and development, assessment of cardiac, pulmonary, and thyroid functions were performed as per the unit protocol. Baseline evaluation of cardiac function was performed by Electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography (ECHO), and Multi-Gated-Acquisition (MUGA) Scan. Ejection Fraction (EF) <50% was considered abnormal. Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs) like total lung capacity, vital capacity, residual volume, and measurement of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were measured. Thyroid function test was performed only if RT was administered, and included measurement of thyroid stimulating Hormone (TSH) and free thyroxin (FT4). Thyroid dysfunction was defined by an elevated TSH level (above the upper limit of normal).


After completion of therapy, all patients were closely followed-up for disease relapse, or side-effects of CT/RT. Thorough clinical history and examination (including measurement of weight and height) was performed at each visit (2-4 monthly during the first 1-2 years, and then 3-6 monthly for 3-5 years). CXR or CECT was performed every 6-12 months for 2-5 years after completion of treatment. CT scan of abdomen and pelvis was done, when indicated. TSH levels were checked annually in those receiving RT. Children who had received blood transfusions during chemotherapy were evaluated for HIV and HBsAg status once they were in CR. Echocardiography and pulmonary function tests were done for all the patients.

Statistical Analysis

Event free survival (EFS) was calculated from the initiation of treatment to relapse, progression of the disease, or the most recent follow-up examination. Overall survival (OS) was determined as the time from initiation of therapy to death or the last follow-up examination. Patients who died as a result of causes other than HL without evidence of recurrence at the time of death were censored. Besides descriptive statistics, the univariate analysis for qualitative data was carried out by applying Chi-square (χ2) or Fisher exact test, wherever applicable, for comparing two groups. Besides this relative risk (RR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) was also calculated. Multivariate logistic regression model and the Cox regression model were performed to determine independent prognostic variables. When follow-up was also considered, the survival analysis was carried out. Survival curves were generated with the Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival method [14]. The comparison between two survival curves was carried out by using log rank test. The signification was observed at P-value <0.05. All calculations were performed with SPSS version 15.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).


Patients’ Characteristics

A total of 35 patients were included in the analysis and their characteristics are depicted in [Table/Fig-1]. There were 31 boys and four girls (M:F ratio 7.6: 1). The median age was 8.3 years (range, 3.5 to 13). The main symptom at presentation was painless progressive enlargement of cervical lymph nodes (96%). The median duration of symptom was nine months (range, 1 to 20). The laboratory parameters are given in [Table/Fig-2]. CECT of the abdomen was performed in all cases. PET CT scan was done in 10 patients. 24 children (68.6%) were <10-year-old, and 23 (65.7%) presented with late stage disease (stage III, and IV). A total of 18 children (51.4%) had bulky disease at presentation, of whom 9 (25.7%) had bulky mediastinal disease. Viral markers (HBsAg, HCV and HIV) were negative in all the patients. Bilateral cryptorchidism and incidental ileo-ileal intussusceptions was detected in one child each. One child underwent splenectomy in view of non-confirmatory lymph node biopsy results, and evidence of splenic involvement with HL.

Characteristics of study population

CharacteristicsNumber (N)Percentage (%)
Sex Male Female310488.611.4
Age ≤ 5 years > 5 – 10 years >10 – 13 years0222115.762.931.4
Clinical findings Peripheral lymphadenopathy Bulky disease  Mediastinaum (M)  Peripheral (P)  Both of the above (P+M) B symptoms Spleen involvement Extranodal disease (other than spleen involvement)3509192121210610025.754.360606017.1
Histologic subtypes Mixed cellularity (MC) Nodular sclerosis (NS) Lymphocyte predominant (LP) Unclassified (UC)0910090725.728.625.720
Clinical stageIIIIIIIV030918058.525.851.414.2

Laboratory features

CharacteristicsNumber (N)Percentage (%)
Hemglobin (gm/dl) <11 ≥11251071.428.6
WBC count (per cu mm) <5000 5000-12,000 >12,00005260414.374.311.4
ESR (mm/hour) <40mm ≥40mm191654.345.7
LDH level (IU/L) <350 ≥350102528.671.4
A: G ratio reversal0822.8

WBC - white blood cell count; ESR - erythrocyte sedimentation rate; LDH - lactate dehydrogenase; A: G ratio - albumin: globulin ratio

Treatment Response

ABVD regimen was started initially in every patient irrespective of the staging status. Additional cycles of COPP were given depending upon whether there was partial remission, relapse, non-response or progression of the disease. Two children (one each in stage III and stage IV) received BEACOPP regimen due to progression of the disease on initial regimens. Four patients (11.4%) were given additional RT for residual disease. All patients were evaluated for treatment response as shown in [Table/Fig-3]. After 4-cycles of CT, 30 patients (85.3%) showed CR, while 5 patients (14.7%) showed partial remission. Four patients (11.4%) showing CR at the stage of reassessment relapsed later at follow-up durations of 11, 20, 31 and 52 months, respectively. One child died during therapy unrelated to the disease process or treatment (due to massive pulmonary haemorrhage secondary to pulmonary tuberculosis). The characteristics of the 5 children who attained partial remission are shown in [Table/Fig-4a]. The details of two patients who relapsed are shown in [Table/Fig-4b].

Response to chemotherapy in relation to sex, age, histology and stage of disease

VariablesInitial therapyCR after subsequent therapy
Sex Male Female240405-02-02-05-
Age ≤ 5 years >5-10 years >10-13 years011809010301-0101-02-010301
Stage (Ann Arbor) I II III IV011809010301-0101-02-010301
Histology (Rye) MC NS LP UC080709040101003-02---01-010102-02

The clinical and therapeutic characteristics of 5 children in partial remission

Age (yrs)SexHistologyStage“B” symptomTherapyStatus

The clinical and therapeutic characteristics of 2 children who relapsed

Age (yrs)SexHistologyStage“B” symptomDuration 1st CR (months)RelapseDuration 2nd CR (months)Relapse
13MNS3present26CT (high dose)45Alive


OS and EFS were estimated for all the patients. One patient in CR died due to an unrelated disease (pulmonary tuberculosis). The mean (SD) duration of follow-up was 46.3 (16.3) months. Thirty-two patients that are alive are in CR (includes 2 patients who are in second remission after treatment for relapse). Five patients (14.7%) who demonstrated partial remission on CT (on initial assessment) were followed up with additional doses of CT and low-dose involved field RT (20–30 Gy) [Table/Fig-4a&4b]. These five patients had following features: spleen involvement (n=2), bulky mediastinal disease (n=3), bulky peripheral disease (n=2), and bulky peripheral plus mediastinal disease (n=3). None of these patients have died due to disease and there were no patients that were lost to follow up (the projected OS at 5 years being 100%). The mean (SE) EFS was 73.1 (3.7) months. The median could not be calculated, because of less number of events as well as early occurrence of events. With a median follow-up duration of 26.5 months, the projected EFS at 5 years is 76.7% (SE 3.6%) [Table/Fig-5]. The EFS according to clinical stage of the disease is given in [Table/Fig-6]. Various prognostic parameters were studied for survival [Table/Fig-7]. Univariate analysis showed significantly lower EFS in those having advanced stage disease (p = 0.037), bulky mediastinal disease (p = 0.015), spleen involvement (p = 0.049), and high LDH level (p = 0.048). On multivariate analysis, none of these factors showed any prognostic significance (p-value of each of the variables ≥ 0.995), which may be due to small sample size or significant interaction between the variables [spleen involvement and LDH level (p = 0.009), spleen involvement and bulky mediastinal disease (p = 0.001), advanced stage and LDH level (p = 0.009), advanced stage and bulky mediastinal disease (p = 0.009), LDH level and bulky mediastinal disease (p = 0.009)].

Overall Event-free survival (EFS) in all children

Event-free survival according to severity of disease

Univariate Analysis of Various Prognostic Factors for Event-Free Survival (EFS) by Cox Regression

VariablesNumber of patientsNumber of eventsRR95% CIp-value
Sex Male Female310470--0.548
Age < 10 years ≥10 years2411430.47110.081 – 2.7430.64
Clinical stage I II III IV061018012140N/AN/A0.741
Early or late stage Early (I-II) Late (III-IV)1223436.3311.001 – 40.0710.037*
B symptoms Present Absent2114431.06710.149 – 7.1450.947
Lymph node involved ≤2 >21124160.18210.019 – 1.7590.193
Bulky mediastinal disease Yes No09265215.02511.677 – 134.5720.015*
Bulky disease Yes No2114528.21311.008 – 66.9140.049*
Histologic subtypes MC NS LP UC091009071312N/AN/A0.165
Haemoglobin (g/dl) <11 ≥112510430.3710.062 – 2.230.269
WBC count (per cu mm) <12,000 ≥12,0002609610.57110.044 – 7.4380.666
ESR (mm/hour) <40mm ≥40mm1916160.38110.038 – 3.7840.398
LDH level (IU/L) <350 ≥3501220438.69511.015 – 74.5030.048*
Hypoalbuminemia Present Absent0827340.38110.122 – 1.1930.596
Spleen involvement Present Absent2114528.21311.008 – 66.9140.049*
Extranodal disease (other than spleen involvement) Present Absent0629160.38110.038 – 3.7840.638
Chemotherapy ABVD ABVD-COPP1619250.62210.099 -.3.9230.612

*p-value <0.05. N/A, not applicable

Toxicity and Complications

These have been compared in [Table/Fig-8]. Nearly all patients developed complete but temporary alopecia. Myelosuppression was mostly mild to moderate. Only 14% patient received haematopoietic growth factors, but 40% required one or more blood transfusions. The commonest complications were infections, febrile neutropenia, (14%), herpes zoster (2.8%), and tuberculosis (2.8%). Amongst the side-effects of CT regimen used, neither symptomatic cardio-toxicity (all had normal EF at the end of chemotherapy, minor tricuspid and mitral regurgitation was noted in 2 patients) nor symptomatic pulmonary disease (2 patients developing reversible mild asymptomatic restrictive pattern in the PFT attributable to bleomycin) was noted in any of the patients. Of the 5 patients who received RT, only 1 patient developed hypothyroidism. Majority of the patients received therapy in an outpatient setting, so that they were able to attend the schools. No sex dependent toxicities were noted.

Comparison of toxicity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy

ToxicityChemotherapy group (n=35)Radiotherapy group (n=05)
Myelosuppression Anaemia (requiring transfusion) Requirement of haematopoietic growth factors Febrile neutropenia40%14%14%NoneNoneNone
Herpes zoster2.8%None
Cardiotoxicity (mild)2.8%None
Pulmonary toxicity (reversible)2.8%None
HypothyroidismNone20% (1 out of 5)


Over the last three decades significant changes have occurred in the management of paediatric HL. Success of combination CT in late stages of HL and delayed side effects of RT in children directed us to initiate chemotherapy in all the stages of the disease. Moreover, staging laparotomy with its complications and morbidity could be avoided. The results of our study showed a strikingly high male to female (M:F) ratio (7.6:1) which is in accordance with previous Indian studies [10,1517]. The mean age at diagnosis was 8.3 years, which is similar to that found in previous study in children with HL [3]. Nearly 70% of our patients were ≤10-year-old.

There are few reports on histological subtypes of HL in Indian children. In a previous Indian study, 83% had mixed-cellularity subtype, which did not have any significant adverse impact on the survival. In contrast, children in our study have nodular-sclerosis as the most common histological subtype, though no adverse impact on survival was noted. The absence of prognostic significance of histology in childhood HL was shown in a recent study conducted by the UK Children’s Cancer Study Group [18]. Advanced stages were seen in nearly 66% of our cases, which is similar to previous reports from India [3,10,15,19]. This could be partly explained by the misled presumptive diagnosis and treatment of lymph node tuberculosis, and delayed referrals in case no response to anti-tubercular drugs.

The identification of prognostic factors facilitates the definition of risk groups for risk-adapted therapy. However, few studies have analysed prognostic factors for paediatric HL [3,10,2024]. In the study by Smith et al; male gender, advanced stage, bulky mediastinal disease, haemoglobin (Hb) <11.0 g/dl and WBC count > 11.5 × 103/cumm were the factors that independently predicted inferior EFS and OS rates [20]. In the study by Koga et al., High-risk disease and age (>10 years) were considered to be poor prognostic factors [21]. In another study, Vecchi et al., reported nodular-sclerosis histology, B symptoms, and large mediastinal mass as unfavourable prognostic factors [22]. Two paediatric studies have analysed various prognostic factors in advanced HL. The Paediatric Oncology Group (POG) found stage IV disease and male sex to be associated with inferior EFS [23], whereas the Children’s Cancer Group found high ESR, hepatomegaly, and mediastinal bulky disease among stage III patients, as negative prognostic factors [24]. In our study, advanced stage, bulky mediastinal disease, bulky disease, involvement of spleen and high LDH level (≥ 350 IU/L) were all prognostic factors for inferior EFS on univariate analysis. LDH level > 320 Iu/ml as an adverse prognostic factor for both EFS as well as OS has been found in one study [25]. Small patient population and no deaths precluded the evaluation of some of the prognostic factors the present study. The lack of significance of some of the prognostic factors may be due to various study factors such as small sample size, very good response to chemotherapy [2,19,26,27] and/or use of FDG-PET/CT scan for better disease delineation [28]. The haemoglobin (Hb) level for prognostic relevance may need revision in view of the high prevalence of anaemia in the Indian subcontinent.

Our results are comparable to previous studies using chemotherapy alone [2,3,10,19,29,30]. Only two prospective trials [25,26] have compared CMT versus CT in paediatric HL, but have not shown any statistical superiority of CMT over CT (though survival was higher in CMT) [25]. A meta-analysis comparing CT versus CMT suggested a limited role for RT [31], while a recent study emphasized CMT to be the standard of care in paediatric HL [32]. This latter conclusion is based on the improved EFS of those treated with RT compared with those who get CT only. However at a follow-up of 3 years, there was no difference in OS between both the groups. Second malignancies (of the breast and thyroid) due to RT also occurred > 3 years after therapy in many patients [33]. A recently completed long term follow up study (including patients > 16 years age) found that, at a median follow-up time of 11.3 years, the rate of OS was lower with subtotal nodal radiation therapy, with or without two cycles of ABVD, than with ABVD alone (hazard ratio for death with ABVD alone, 0.50; p = 0.04) [34]. This difference was due to the number of deaths from causes other than HL, including second malignancies. The total number of second malignancies (breast, thyroid, gastrointestinal, leukemia, soft-tissue sarcoma, bone, CNS, Lymphoma, melanoma, head & neck, lung, and skin) and cardiovascular events was higher in the RT group than in the ABVD-alone group. Our data in combination with those of the others mentioned above do not support CMT as the gold standard for initial therapy in childhood HL.

The CT regimens have both acute (myelosuppression) and long-term (cardiac, pulmonary, gonadal, and secondary leukemia) organ toxicities. Regimens alternating ABVD with COPP regimens improve disease control and reduce the cumulative dose of alkylating agents, but increase the risk of long-term cardiopulmonary toxicity [3537]. In our study (mean follow-up of 46.3months) as well as in previous studies [25,26], the follow-up period is still too short to fully appreciate the late adverse-effects. Because most recurrences after CMT for paediatric HL tend to occur during initial 3 years of treatment [59,23,38,39], long-term outcomes would not change considerably by increasing the length of follow-up. Worth mentioning is the difference in the EFS and the OS recorded by our unit, which suggests that, we were able to salvage many patients despite the presentation at more advanced stages.

Only four children required additional RT for remission with the OS being 100%. The results show that RT could be used as a second line effective salvage therapy if CT is not sufficient. Thus additional RT could be reserved for those cases that present with residual disease or relapse after completing chemotherapy, which also has been shown by other studies [19].

At the moment we have been able to evaluate cardiac, thyroid, and pulmonary function in all children. No clinical signs of cardiac dysfunction have been found in these patients. This may be due to considerably lower dose of doxorubicin used in our regime. It is worthy to note that this lower dose has not adversely affected clinical outcomes, while avoiding serious side-effects.

There is a role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) in children with relapsed/refractory lymphoma HL. In a recent study, approximately half of all paediatric patients with lymphoma who failed first-line therapy and demonstrated chemosensitivity to second-line therapy could be salvaged with ASCT. Though, it was planned in present study, none of our patients underwent ASCT due to multiple reasons [40].


There are some limitations of our study. Small sample size precluded derivation of prognostic factors. A short follow up period was also a disadvantage, though none of our patients were lost to follow-up. Despite these limitations, our study has shown that CT alone (with ABVD or alternating COPP-ABVD) is as effective as CMT. A longer follow-up is required to see late effects of CMT, including survival, and the quality of life of survivors.


Present study found systemic CT alone to be an effective therapy in childhood Hodgkin lymphoma. However, a small sample in present study limits the generalisability of these findings. The findings needs to be replicated in larger population, preferably randomized clinical trials, before any firm conclusion can be made.


[1]Nachman JB, Sposto R, Herzog P, Randomized comparison of low-dose involved field radiotherapy and no radiotherapy for children with Hodgkin’s disease who achieve a complete response to chemotherapy J Clin Oncol 2002 20:3765-71.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Castellanos EM, Barrantes JC, Báez LF, A chemotherapy only therapeutic approach to paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: AHOPCA LH 1999 Paediatr Blood Cancer 2014 61:997-1002.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Arya LS, Dinand V, Thavaraj V, Hodgkin’s disease in indian children: outcome with chemotherapy alone Paediatr Blood Cancer 2006 46:26-34.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Johnson PW, Sydes MR, Hancock BW, Consolidation radiotherapy in patients with advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma: survival data from the UKLG LY09 randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN97144519) J Clin Oncol 2010 28:3352-59.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Chow LML, Nathan PC, Hodgson DC, Survival and late effects in children with Hodgkin’s lymphoma treated with MOPP/ABV and low-dose extended-field irradiation J Clin Oncol 2006 24:5735-41.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Hall E, Phil D, Intensity modulated radiation therapy, protons and the risk of second cancers Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006 65:1-7.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Mertens AC, Liu Q, Neglia JP, Cause specific mortality among 5- year survivors of childhood cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100:1368-79.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Bhatia S, Yasui Y, Robison LL, High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin’s disease. Report from the Late Effects Study Group J Clin Oncol 2003 21:4386-94.  [Google Scholar]

[9]De Bruin M, Sparidans J, Veer MB, Breast cancer risk in female survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: lower risk after smaller radiation volumes J Clin Oncol 2009 27:4239-46.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Trehan A, Singla S, Marwaha RK, Hodgkin lymphoma in children: experience in a tertiary care centre in India J Paediatr Haematol Oncol 2013 35:174-79.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Arya LS, Dinand V, Current strategies in the treatment of childhood Hodgkins disease Indian Paediatr 2005 42:1115-28.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Piccaluga PP, Agostinelli C, Gazzola A, Pathobiology of hodgkin lymphoma Adv Haematol 2011 2011:920898  [Google Scholar]

[13]Lukes RJ, Butler JJ, The pathology and nomenclature of Hodgkin’s disease Cancer Res 1966 26:1063-81.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Kaplan EL, Meier P, Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations J Am Stat Assoc 1958 53:457-81.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Chandi L, Kumar L, Kochupillai V, Hodgkin’s disease: a retrospective analysis of 15 years experience at a large referral centre Natl Med J India 1998 11:212-17.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Kapoor G, Advani SH, Dinshaw KA, Treatment results of Hodgkin’s disease in Indian children Paediatr Haematol Oncol 1995 12:559-69.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Arya LS, Thavaraj V, Dawar R, Hodgkin’s disease in Indian children: Report from a major referral centre Med Paediatr Oncol 2000 35:203  [Google Scholar]

[18]Shankar AG, Ashley S, Radford M, Does histology influence outcome in childhood Hodgkin’s disease? Results from the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group J Clin Oncol 1997 15:2622-30.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Sripada PV, Tenali SG, Vasudevan M, Hybrid (COPP/ABV) therapy in childhood Hodgkin’s disease: A study of 53 cases during 1988–1993 at the Cancer Institute, Madras Paediatr Haemat Oncol 1995 12:333-41.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Smith RS, Chen Q, Hudson MM, Prognostic factors for children with Hodgkin’s disease treated with combined-modality therapy J Clin Oncol 2003 21:2026-33.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Koga Y, Kumagai M, Takimoto T, Retrospective analysis of 157 patients with paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma in Japan: investigation by four paediatric cancer study groups Rinsho Ketsueki 2012 53:443-49.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Vecchi V, Pileri S, Burnelli R, Treatment of paediatric Hodgkin’s disease tailored to stage, mediastinal mass, and age: An Italian (AIEOP) multicenter study on 215 patients Cancer 1993 72:2049-56.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Weiner M, Leventhal B, Brecher ML, Randomized study of intensive MOPP-ABVD with or without low-dose total-nodal radiation therapy in the treatment of stages IIB, IIIA2, IIIB, and IV Hodgkin’s disease in paediatric patients: A Paediatric Oncology Group study J Clin Oncol 1997 15:2769-79.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Hutchinson RJ, Fryer CJH, Davis PC, MOPP or radiation in addition to ABVD in the treatment of pathologically staged advanced Hodgkin’s disease in children: Results of the Children’s Cancer Group phase III trial J Clin Oncol 1998 16:897-906.  [Google Scholar]

[25]García R, Hernández JM, Caballero MD, Serum lactate dehydrogenase level as a prognostic factor in Hodgkin’s disease Br J Cancer 1993 68:1227-31.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Baez F, Ovampo E, Conter V, Treatment of childhood Hodgkin’s disease with COPP or COPP/ABV (hybrid) without radiotherapy in Nicaragua Ann Oncol 1997 8:247-50.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Landman-Parker J, Pacquement H, Leblanc T, Localized childhood Hodgkin’s disease: Response-adapted chemotherapy with etoposide, bleomycin, vinblastine, and prednisolone before low-dose radiation therapy—results of the French Society of Paediatric Oncology study MDH90 J Clin Oncol 2000 18:1500-07.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Gupta AK, Kandasamy D, Seth R, Role of FDG-PET/CT in management of Hodgkin’s lymphoma Indian J Paediatr 2009 76:1273-74.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Van den Berg H, Stuve W, Behrendt H, Treatment of hodgkin’s disease in children with alternating mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisolone (mopp) and adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) courses without radiotherapy Med Paediatr Oncol 1997 29:23-27.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Yaniv I, Saab A, Cohen IJ, Hodgkin’s disease in children: Reduced tailored chemotherapy for stage I–II disease J Paediatr Haematol Oncol 1996 18:76-90.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Loeffler M, Brosteanu O, Hasenclever D, Meta-analysis of chemotherapy versus combined modality treatment trials in Hodgkin Lymphoma J Clin Oncol 1998 16:818-29.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Laskar S, Gupta T, Vimal S, Consolidation radiation after complete remission in Hodgkin’s disease following six cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapy: is there a need? J Clin Oncol 2004 22:62-68.  [Google Scholar]

[33]Leeuwen van EF, Klokman WJ, Veer MB, Long-term risk of second malignancy in survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma treated during adolescence or young adulthood J Clin Oncol 2000 18:487-97.  [Google Scholar]

[34]Meyer RM, Gospodarowicz MK, Connors JM, ABVD alone versus radiation-based therapy in limited-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma N Engl J Med 2012 366:399-408.  [Google Scholar]

[35]Aleman BM, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, De Bruin ML, Late cardiotoxicity after treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma Blood 2007 109:1878-86.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Khafaga YM, Belgaumi AF, Paediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma: changing concepts and moving points in radiation therapy Transfus Apher Sci 2013 49:56-62.  [Google Scholar]

[37]Bossi G, Cerveri I, Volpini E, Long-term pulmonary sequelae after treatment of childhood Hodgkin’s disease Ann Oncol 1997 8:19-24.  [Google Scholar]

[38]Fryer CJ, Hutchinson RJ, Krailo M, Efficacy and toxicity of 12 courses of ABVD followed by low-dose regional radiation in advanced Hodgkin’s disease in children: A report of the Children’s Cancer Study Group J Clin Oncol 1990 8:1971-80.  [Google Scholar]

[39]Marri PR, Ansell SM, Progress in the initial management of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Transfus Apher Sci 2013 49:12-18.  [Google Scholar]

[40]Sumaili H, Al-Kofide A, Al-Seraihi A, Outcome of paediatric patients with lymphoma following stem cell transplant: a single institution report Leuk. Lymphoma 2015 56:1327-34.  [Google Scholar]