The study is a cross-sectional, observational study carried out at Seth GS medical college and KEM hospital, Mumbai a tertiary hospital in India. A total of 224 male patients between ages 20-60 years with ED were enrolled, 207 of whom were finally included in the study, which conformed to the institutional ethical guidelines. Out of which 68 patients were in age group 20-40 years (Young patient group) and 139 in age group of 40-60 years (Old patient group). They were evaluated for history of hypertension (HTN), Diabetes mellitus (DM), Ischemic heart disease (IHD) and smoking (S). BGL (fasting and post meal), Lipid Profile and 12 Lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was done in all of them. ED was evaluated and diagnosed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 self-administered questionnaire, wherein ED is addressed by a five-question scoring method and each question scored 0–5. Patients with comorbidities such as thyroid disorders, renal failure, liver cirrhosis, stroke, chronic obstructive respiratory disease, hypogonadism, or traumatic causes and those who had undergone pelvic, penile, urethral, or prostate surgery or were being already treated for ED were excluded.

All the data were analysed using SPSS 16 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data are expressed as mean standard deviation. The Student’s t-test was used to compare means between groups, and the chi-square test was used to compare proportions between the groups. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All confidence intervals (CIs) are two tailed and calculated at the 0.05 level.

The demographics of the overall patient population are summarized in [Table/Fig-1].

Out of 207 patient severity of ED was mild, moderate and severe in 26 (12.5%), 72 (34.7%) and 109 (52.6%) patients respectively. One hundred forty nine patients had at least one abnormal screening parameter. Abnormal lipid profile was most common screening abnormality (n=93, 44.9%) followed by abnormal ECG (n=65, 31.4%), HTN (n=43, 20.7%), deranged BGL (n=9, 4.3%). All patients with abnormal screening underwent cardiology consultation. 2D ECHO and Stress test was done when necessary. Thirty six patients underwent coronary angiography. CAD was found in 22 patients (10.62%). Nine patients were between 20-40 years of age (13.23%) and 13 patients were between 40-60 years of age (9.35%). All 9 young patients had deranged LP; severe ED. Six patients were smokers while nobody was hypertensive. While severe ED affected 10 out of 13 patients (76.9%) above 40 years of age with CAD, 6(46.1%) were smokers, 11(84.6%) had both deranged LP and HTN. Ten (76.9%) patients were diabetics [Table/Fig-2].

A total of 224 male patients, 207 patients between ages 20-60 years with ED were enrolled, which conformed to the institutional ethical guidelines. Out of which 68 patients were in age group 20-40 years (Young patient group) and 139 in age group of 40-60years (Old patient group) [Table/Fig-3].

[Table/Fig-3]:

Age distribution of patients (X axis- age in years, Y axis- no. of pt.)

There are number of studies in literature mostly western that have assessed relationship between ED and risk of CVD. These studies have described the penis as a barometer of endothelial health. Endothelial diseases were largely ascribed to western lifestyle and dietary habits. Not with standing these facts, some studies have mentioned more severe ED in Indian population to our surprise. Vlachopaulos et al., carried out a similar study on 436 men and found out 13.3% rate of occult CAD in patients presenting with ED [16]. Montorasi et al., studied that in patients with established CAD, ED preceded CAD by an average of 2 to 3 years [10]. These findings support the assertion that ED is a harbinger of cardiovascular events and is related to the severity of CAD.

Three recent studies have evaluated the effect of age on the relationship between ED and cardiovascular risk. A random sample of more than 1400 community-dwelling men who had regular sexual partners and no known CAD were studied by Inman et al., [17]. These men were biennially screened for the presence of ED over a 10-year follow-up period. In their study, prevalence’s of ED were 2%, 6%, 17%, and 39% for men 40 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and ≥70 years of age, respectively. The incidence densities for CAD per1000 person-years for men without ED were 0.94 (40–49-year-old), 5.09 (50–59-year-old), 10.72 (60–69-year-old), and 23.30 (≥70-year-old). CAD incidence densities increased to 48.52 (40–49-year-old), 27.15 (50–59-year-old), 23.97 (60–69-year-old), and 29.63 (≥70-year-old) for men with ED. These data suggest that while in older men, the prognostic importance of ED is diminished, ED in younger men is associated with a marked increase in the risk of future cardiac events,. Chew et al., analysed hospital morbidity data and death registrations in a retrospective cohort study of 1660 men with ED [18]. A standardized incidence rate ratio was used to compare the incidence of cardiovascular events subsequent to the manifestation of ED in this cohort to that in the general male population. They observed a significantly higher incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in men with ED than was observed in the general population (standardized incidence rate ratio, 2.2). In men 20 to 40 years of age with ED the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events was more than 7 times the incidence in the same age groups in the general population. However a poor relationship between ED and cardiovascular events was observed with increasing age. The incidence rate ratios were also not statistically significant in men 70 years and older.

Recently, a case control study involving 242 men (mean age, 58 years) referred for elective coronary angiography was performed by Riedner et al., [19]. One hundred fourteen men had significant CAD. CAD was not associated with increased likelihood of ED in men ≥60 years (p = 0.5). However, men below 60 years with CAD were significantly more likely to have ED than those without CAD (p = .009). The probability of CAD was 2.3 times higher in men below 60 years of age with ED versus those without ED (p = 0.04) in a statistical model that controlled for the effects of cardiovascular risk factors, testosterone and C-reactive protein. No association between ED and probability of CAD was found in men ≥60 years (p = 0.3). Above mentioned studies support ED as a surrogate marker of CAD in men in their third, fourth, fifth and sixth decades and suggest that ED screening is a valuable means of identifying young and middle-aged men who are candidates for cardiovascular risk assessment and medical intervention.

Another study by Jackson et al., suggested that ED is a useful predictor of subclinical, non–flow-limiting CAD that is not detectable using stress ECG. Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission CT is a technique commonly used to diagnose and stratify CVD [20]. Min et al., studied 221 men referred for the same and found that men with ED exhibited more severe coronary heart disease than men without ED (43% vs. 17%, respectively) [21]. Left ventricular dysfunction was also significantly more common among men with ED (24% vs. 11%). The prevalence of ED in Asian Indian patients undergoing coronary angiography was studied by Jatinder Kumar et al., [22]. Whether the severity of ED correlates with angiographic severity of CAD was also studied. Kumar J et al., found out that, among 175 patients evaluated, ED was present in 70%. There was higher incidence of multi vessel CAD (80% versus 36%, p 0.001), diffuse CAD (81% versus 34%, p 0.001), and higher number of mean coronary vessels involved in patients with ED compared with those without ED (especially those with severe ED). Symptoms of CAD were preceded by onset of symptoms of ED by a mean of 24.6 months [22]. Number of patient approaching tertiary care hospital for evaluation of ED is increasing. On routine evaluation of ED along with few specialised tests, we could detect CAD in 10.62% of otherwise asymptomatic young patients. Incidence of CAD in this age group without ED is within the range of 1-3.3 %. These statistics belong to Indian population. In present study, P-value of ED for detection of CAD in younger patients was significant (p= 0.001) than in older patients. Similarly deranged LP (p=0.04) and DM (p=0.003) were powerful predictors of CAD in young and older patients respectively.

We did not perform physiological ED vascular studies including anatomical or functional evaluation of penile circulation and testing for inflammatory markers in our patient population and primarily categorized ED based on the IIEF-5 score. Further studies are needed to assess the role of physiological ED vascular studies and inflammatory markers in these patients. In patients with normal coronaries on invasive coronary angiography (which is the gold standard for this), we did not perform any further imaging such as computed tomography coronary angiography. Coronary intravascular ultrasound or assessment of coronary flow reserve may provide more definitive information in patients with early coronary atherosclerotic changes and a normal coronary angiogram because coronary angiography is at best a lumenogram, which may not detect true plaque volume extension. We excluded patients already being treated for ED and this may have artificially reduced the actual number of ED patients in the study group. Although lack of a control group is also a limitation of the study, the main aims of the study were to prospectively assess the prevalence of CAD in Asian Indian patients undergoing evaluation of ED.

Presence of an ED in a patient below 40 years of age serves as a surrogate marker for CAD. Presence of risk factors and lab abnormalities in patients with ED warrants a cardiology referral to detect CAD.