JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pathology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13474.6474
Year : 2015 | Month : Sep | Volume : 9 | Issue : 9 Full Version Page : EC01 - EC03

Spectrum of Typical and Atypical Clinico-Histopathological and Radiological Presentation of Soft Tissue and Muscular Cysticercosis in Mid-Western and Far-Western Region of Nepal

Pragya Gautam Ghimire1, Prasanna Ghimire2, Reena Rana3

1 Lecturer, Department of Pathology, Nepalgunj Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Banke, Nepal.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Nepalgunj Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Banke, Nepal.
3 Lecturer, Department of Pathology, Nepalgunj Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Banke, Nepal.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Prasanna Ghimire, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Nepalgunj Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur-21904 Banke, Nepal.
E-mail: drprasannaghimire@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Soft tissue and muscular involvement in cysticercosis is a relatively rarer presentation.

Materials and Methods

Twenty seven histopathologically confirmed cases of soft tissue and muscular cysticercosis were collected and the clinical, radiological data was reviewed.

Results

There was female predominance for the lesions (19 cases among 27 cases). The most common location for the lesion was in the arm (9 cases), thigh (4 cases), forearm (7 cases), abdominal wall (4 cases) followed by nape of the neck (2 cases). Lesion ranged from 8 mm to 5 cm in size. Ultrasound was diagnostic in 24 cases and inconclusive in three cases. Histopathologically, intact cyst wall was noted in 12 cases, scolex in 5 cases. Seven cases showed degenerating cyst wall surrounded by inflammatory cells, granulation tissue and fibrosis.

Conclusion

Fine needle aspiration cytology and histopathological assessment is prudent in the diagnosis of soft tissue and muscular cysticercosis in cases posing clinical diagnostic dilemma.

Keywords

Introduction

Cysticercosis is the most common parasitic infection worldwide with a prevalence estimated at greater than 50 millions. The disease is endemic in Mexico, Central and South America and parts of Africa, Asia and India. Although considered endemic in various regions of the developing world, there has been an increase in the number of cases in the United States and Europe due to various factors including migration [1]. Cysticercosis is caused by ingestion of food, water, or faeces contaminated with eggs of T. Solium with humans as dead-end hosts. Autoinfection can occur from contaminated hands as well as regurgitation of proglottids of an adult tapeworm from the gut into the stomach. Larvae (oncospheres) released from their shells penetrate the gut mucosa and spread throughout the body developing into cysticerci. The clinical effects depend on the involved site, larval burden as well as the host response. Various organs can be affected due to cysticercosis including the brain, spinal cord, orbit, heart, subcutaneous tissues and muscles [2]. In this article, we discuss the various spectrum of typical and atypical clinico-histopathological and radiological presentation of soft tissue and muscular cysticercosis.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective search was made in the records of the Department of Pathology for histopathologically confirmed cases of soft tissue and muscular cysticercosis between August 2011 and January 2015. Medical records of the cases were reviewed for their clinical, radiological data. A total of 27 cases of soft tissue and muscular cysticercosis were included in the study. Two cases with inadequate clinical/radiological information were excluded from the study. Fine needle aspiration was performed using a 22-g needle and 10 ml syringe. Smears were separately wet fixed and air dried and stained with conventional Papanicolaou and Giemsa stain respectively according to the amount of aspirate. Excisional biopsy specimens were collected in 10% Formalin for fixation, processed for 18 hours in tissue processor, paraffin embedded and blocks were prepared. Sections were stained by Hematoxylin and Eosin method and mounted using DPX.

Results

Among the total of 27 cases, 19 cases were noted in females with eight cases in males. The age of presentation of patients ranged from 8 years to 65 years. The most common site of lesion was in the arm (9 cases), forearm (8 cases), the abdominal wall (4 cases) thigh (3 cases) followed by neck (3 cases). The size of the lesion ranged from 8 mm to 5 cm in diameter. The clinical presentation of the lesions varied depending on the site of the lesion. No any correlation was noted between the symptom and size of the lesion. Clinically, cysticercosis was misdiagnosed as lipoma in most cases (11 cases) [Table/Fig-1,2]. Ultrasonographically, 24 cases were suggestive of cysticercosis. Three cases were inconclusive for the diagnosis of cysticercosis.

Clinical presentation of patient

SNAge (in years)SexSite of the lesionClinical diagnosisUltrasound findings
112FNeckLymphadenopathyCyst with scolex and surrounding abscess
224FForearm (Right)CysticercosisCyst with scolex
327FAbdominal wallLipomaCyst with scolex with perilesional edema
417FForearm (Right)CysticercosisCyst without scolex but with perilesional edema
522MArm (Left)LipomaCyst with scolex and surrounding abscess
619FArm (Left)CysticercosisCyst with scolex with perilesional edema
723MForearm (Left)LipomaCyst without scolex but with perilesional edema
827FArm (Left)CysticercosisCyst with scolex with perilesional edema
98FNeckSebaceous cystCyst with scolex with perilesional edema
1037FAbdominal wallCysticercosisCyst without scolex with perilesional edema
1141MArm (Right)LipomaCyst with scolex with perilesional edema
1265FForearm (Right)LipomaCyst without scolex with perilesional edema
1331MNeck (Right)CysticercosisCyst without scolex with perilesional edema
1426MArm (Right)CysticercosisCyst without scolex with perilesional edema
1522FThigh (Left)LipomaCyst with scolex and surrounding abscess
1624MArm (Right)CysticercosisCyst with scolex with perilesional edema
1721FAbdominal wallLipomaInconclusive
1820MThigh (Left)LipomaCyst with scolex and surrounding abscess
1918FArm (Left)Sebaceous cystCyst with scolex with perilesional edema
2021FForearm (Right)NeurofibromaInconclusive
2120FThigh (Left)LipomaCyst with scolex with perilesional edema
2216FArm (Right)CysticercosisCyst with scolex with perilesional edema
2317FForearm (Left)CysticercosisCyst without scolex with perilesional edema
2457FForearm (Right)LipomaCyst without scolex with perilesional edema
2549MAbdominal wallLipomaCyst with scolex and surrounding abscess
2642FArm (Right)CysticercosisCyst without scolex with perilesional edema
2737FForearm (Right)NeurofibromaInconclusive

FNAC and Histopathological findings

FNAC findings:Histopathological findings:
Nature of Aspirate:Clear (7 cases)Blood mixed (8 cases)Purulent (12 cases)Cytological findings:Bladder wall of cysticercus + mixed inflammatory cells (11 cases)Hooklets + minimal mixed inflammatory cells (6 cases)Foreign body giant cells + minimal mixed inflammatory cells (5 cases)Acellular cyst wall (5 cases)Intact bladder wall (12 cases)Scolex (5 cases)Degenerating cyst wall with surrounding fibrosis, calcification, granulomas (10 cases)

Histopathologically, intact cyst wall was noted in 12 cases, scolex in 5 cases. Ten cases showed degenerating cyst wall surrounded by inflammatory cells, granulation tissue and fibrosis [Table/Fig-3,4,5 and 6].

A 12-year-old girl with neck swelling who was clinically suspected as having lymphadenopathy

Muscular cysticercosis showing a small cystic nodule at the periphery of the tissue.

Photomicrograph showing well defined host capsule surrounding a cyst containing a parasitic larva characterized by thick tegument with knobby projections (H&E X40)

Photomicrograph showing scolex with suckers (H&E ×100)

On cytology, bladder wall of cysticercus were noted in majority cases (11 cases) followed by presence of hooklets in 6 cases in a background of mixed inflammatory cells [Table/Fig-2, 7].

Photomicrograph demonstrating Scimitar shaped hooklet and a neutrophil in the center on cytology (Giemsa X40)

Discussion

Cysticercosis cellulosae, the larval stage of tapeworm Taenia solium is the causative agent of cysticercosis. Cysticercosis is endemic in many countries of the developing world posing a major public health problem [1]. Cysticercosis involves various organs of the body however involvement of the soft tissues and muscle is a relatively uncommon presentation [2]. The clinical presentation depends on the site of the lesion, larval burden as well as the host reaction. Subcutaneous cysticercosis presents as painless or painful subcutaneous nodules. Muscular cysticercosis has varied clinical presentation with frequently being asymptomatic to either of the described clinical manifestion: the myalgic, myopathic type; the nodular or masslike type; and the rare pseudohypertrophy type. In our series of cases, no any pseudohypertrophy type of presentation was noted which is relatively common in disseminated cases. In our study, the majority of the lesions were in the upper extremity which is similar to studies by Kala et al., and Handa et al., [3,4]. The prevalence of cysticercosis in Nepal has been shown to vary with gender, ethnicity, behavioral, environmental factor as well as geographical region [5]. There has been wide variation in the prevalence of Taenia in various studied population in Nepal with the highest 50% noted in the Magar community in Nepal [6].

Imaging has been crucial in the diagnosis of soft tissue cysticercosis as well as muscular cysticercosis [7]. Among various imaging modalities, ultrasound is found to be widely performed due to its feasibility and characteristic features. The sonological spectrum of soft tissue cysticercosis includes intramuscular abscess with an eccentrically situated typical cyst with a scolex within, typical cysticercosis cyst with a scolex within and surrounding mild edema but no abscess as well as irregular cyst with no scolex within [7,8]. Imaging has been indispensable in the diagnosis of cysticercosis in atypical presentation where there is clinical diagnostic dilemma as in one of our patient who was diagnosed with suppurative lymphadenitis [Table/Fig-2].

Fine needle aspiration cytology is the preferred initial pathological examination in the evaluation of subcutaneous nodules which is usually performed image guided in atypical cases [9,10]. Various studies have demonstrated the implication of FNAC in diagnosis of cysticercosis in subcutaneous nodules. Although, the presence of eosinophils, neutrophils, palisading histiocytes and giant cells in the aspirate suggest a possibility of parasitic entity; the diagnosis of cysticercus requires demonstration of fragment of larval cuticle and parenchyma. In keeping with various studies, scolex was not present in the cytological smears [11]. In equivocal cases, histopathological examination of biopsy specimen is fruitful in the diagnosis of cysticercosis. Definite diagnosis of cysticercosis can be made by demonstration of parts of parasite teguments, hooklets, parenchymatous portion and calcareous corpuscles.

Conclusion

It is important to have high degree of suspicion in patients hailing from or having history of travel to endemic regions for cysticercosis who present with any soft tissue or muscular cysticercosis. A clinico-pathological and radiological correlation is integral in such cases thus avoiding unnecessary intervention and patient morbidity.

References

[1]Kraft R, Cysticercosis: an emerging parasitic disease American family physician 2007 76(1):91-96.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Rai Santosh P, Kumar A, Sekhar M, Chakraborti S, Cysticercosis cysts everywhere! Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 2014 7(2):142  [Google Scholar]

[3]Kala P, Khare P, Fine-needle aspiration cytology as a diagnostic modality for cysticercosis: A clinicocytological study of 137 cases Journal of Cytology / Indian Academy of Cytologists 2014 31(2):68-72.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Handa U, Garg S, Mohan H, Fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of subcutaneous cysticercosis Diagnostic cytopathology 2008 36(3):183-87.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Devleesschauwer B, Aryal A, Joshi DD, Rijal S, Sherchand JB, Praet N, Epidemiology of Taenia solium in Nepal: is it influenced by the social characteristics of the population and the presence of Taenia asiatica? Tropical Medicine & International Health 2012 17(8):1019-22.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Sah RB, Bhattarai S, Yadav S, Baral R, Jha N, Pokharel PK, A study of prevalence of intestinal parasites and associated risk factors among the school children of Itahari, Eastern Region of Nepal Tropical Parasitology 2013 3(2):140-44.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Rastogi S, Arora P, Devi P, Wazir SS, Kapoor S, Importance of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of cysticercosis of temporalis muscle mimicking temporal space infection Contemporary clinical dentistry 2013 4(4):504  [Google Scholar]

[8]Naik D, Srinath M, Kumar A, Soft tissue cysticercosis - Ultrasonographic spectrum of the disease The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging 2011 21(1):60-62.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Suchitha S, Vani K, Sunila R, Manjunath GV, Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Cysticercosis—A Case Report Case Reports in Infectious Diseases 2012 2012:854-704.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Shah PN, Mahajan G, Ghate G, Thomas J, Cysticercosis of Temporalis Muscle: A Histological Surprise WebmedCentral OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY 2013 4(6):WMC0043132013;4(WMC004313)  [Google Scholar]

[11]Gill M, Dua S, Gill PS, Gupta V, Gupta S, Sen R, Cytomorphological spectrum of subcutaneous and intramuscular cysticercosis: A study of 22 cases Journal of Cytology / Indian Academy of Cytologists 2010 27(4):123-26.  [Google Scholar]