Paediatrics Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13771.6377
Year : 2015 | Month : Aug | Volume : 9 | Issue : 8 Page : SC04 - SC07

Clinical and Laboratory Potential Predictors of Blood Culture Positivity in Under Five Children with Clinically Severe Pneumonia - Khartoum -Sudan

Karimeldin Mohamed Ali Salih1, El-Fatih El-Samani2, Jalal Ali Bilal3, Widad Eldouch4, Salah Ahmed Ibrahim5

1 Associate Professor, Deparment of Pediatrics, Bahri University, College of Medicine, Sudan and King Khalid University, College of Medicine, Abha, KSA.
2 Professor, Deparment of Community Medicine & Epidemiology Department, Ahfad University for Women, Khartoum, Sudan.
3 Assistant Professor, Deparment of Pediatrics, Qassim University, College of Medicine, Buraydah, KSA.
4 Consultant Pediatrician, Deparment of Pediatrics, Ministry of Health, Sudan.
5 Professor, Deparment of Pediatrics, University of Khartoum, Faculty of Medicine, Sudan.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Karimeldin M. A. Salih, College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, King Khalid University, Abha, K.S.A. E-mail : karimeldin_salih@hotmail.com, chdcomkku@gmail.com
Abstract

Background

Blood culture is necessary for appropriate management of clinically severe pneumonia in children under five years of age. However, in limited resource countries it might be unduly costly and waste of valuable time because of the high negative culture rate.

Objectives

This study aims to identify clinical and laboratory parameters that potentially predict a positive blood culture in cases of severe pneumonia.

Materials and Methods

A hospital based study, enrolled 189 cases satisfying the WHO definition of severe pneumonia. Age, gender, clinical history, physical examination, temperature, complete blood count, C-reactive protein, blood culture and Chest X Ray for all the patients were recorded.

Results

Forty one patients had positive blood culture giving a prevalence of 21.7%. All variables were used in a dichotomous manner. White Blood Count (WBC) more than 20 000, very high C-reactive protein (C-RP ≥8mg/L) and Temperature more than 40oC, had a positive predictive value of 46.1%, 44.3% and 40.0% respectively for a positive culture as well as a Negative Predictive Value of 91.1%, 91.6% and 91.7% respectively. The WBC more than 20 000 and temperature above 40oC had a significant association with a positive blood culture. Their adjusted Odds Ratios were 3.9 (95% CI: 1.4-10.90) and 3.1 (95% CI: 1.2-8.4) respectively. This was not the case for C-RP (Odds Ratio=2.2, 95% CI: 0.7-2.2) or positive Chest X Ray (Odds Ratio=1.5, 95% CI: 0.6-3.6).

Conclusion and Recommendation

Temperature of more than 40oC, Very high C-RP and WBC of more than 20 000 are good indicators of a potential positive blood culture. It is therefore recommended that further research be undertaken to refine these predictors as screening tools before resorting to blood culture. It is also recommended that antibiotic treatment may be initiated on the basis of the high temperature and WBC, while waiting for the culture results.

Introduction

Pneumonia is the main cause of death among children under five years of age particularly in developing countries. According to the WHO, there are more than 15 million cases representing 7-13% of annual pneumonia cases which necessitate hospital admission due to their severity [1]. In order to minimize the burden of severe pneumonia, efforts aiming to identify the causative agents are mandatory. Blood, sputum, fluids or tissue samples from the lungs for culture are usually useful, however not promising in young children due to difficulty or inadequacy in collection of samples, as well as transportation difficulties or lack of technical facilities in developing countries [2,3]. Beside chest radiography [4], other means including acute phase reactants, total and differential white blood count and ESR provide support for the diagnosis and management of bacterial infection thus minimizing the burden of the disease by decreasing the hospital stay and decreasing mortality [510]. In the absence of definitive aetiology, rapid tools for detecting an inflammatory marker such as C-reactive protein are considered useful to anticipate the possible bacterial aetiology before culture is available, to save time and to lessen hospital stay [11]. The aim of this study was to determine if fever as a clinical variable, total white blood cells count (WBC), C-reactive protein (C-RP) and chest radiography as laboratory variables can anticipate a positive blood culture for cases of clinically severe pneumonia.

Materials and Methods

This hospital-based study was conducted from January 2011 to June 2012, in the Children Emergency Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan, which is a tertiary teaching hospital with a capacity of 150 beds.

All children under five years of age who satisfied the WHO criteria of clinical severe pneumonia were included in the study [1217]. Consent was obtained from the parents or the child guardian. Children with proven HIV/AIDS, severe malnutrition, tuberculosis, bronchial asthma or with refusal of the guardians were excluded from the study. We recorded demographic data, medical history, vital signs and physical examination results. Blood samples were collected for complete blood count (CBC), C-reactive protein (C-RP) and blood culture using (chocolate blood agar, blood agar, nutrient agar, H and F factors, very special media and tissue media). Colony morphology, alpha hemolytic on blood agar, catalase negative, optochin susceptibility and bile solubility and V factors are used. A chest X-ray was also done for all cases, which was interpreted by a senior radiologist.

A total of 189 children under five years of age satisfied the inclusion criteria. Six variables were used in the analysis after categorizing them into dichotomous variables, namely: culture positive or negative; Age => 36 months or < 36 months; Temperature => 40 0C or < 400C; WBC => 20 000 or < 20 000; C-RP very high (≥ 8mg/l) or normal to moderately high (≤7.9mg/l), and chest radiograph positive or negative for pneumonia.

Statistical Analysis

The IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 21) [18] was used for data entry and analysis. Two by Two tables were constructed and Odds Ratios, Mantel and Haenszel Chi [19] and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed using a hand held calculator to estimate the magnitude and statistical significance of the association between each of the variables and culture positivity. All variables were then included in a multi-variable logistic regression model to assess the best predictors of a positive blood culture. The 95% confidence interval was used to test for significance.

Results

The total number of children who satisfied the inclusion criteria was 189. Out of them, 102 (54%) were females and 87(46%) were males. A temperature of > 40°C was recorded in 80 (42%) of the studied group. Forty-one of the 189 blood samples yielded positive results for bacterial growth, thus, the prevalence of culture positivity was 21.7%. A total white cell count (WBC) ≥ 20000 cell/L was recorded in 65 (34%) and very high C-RP was found in 70 (37%) of the blood samples. Chest X-Ray findings of pneumonia were recognized in 99 (52%) of the study group [Table/Fig-1]. The culture yeilded 17 (41.5%) streptococci, 9 (22%) Pseudomonas, and 6 (14.6%) staphylococci. The remaining 9 (22%) included Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma, Chlamydia and Legionella in small numbers [Table/Fig-2].

Descriptive Statistics, 189 children with Clinically Severe Pneumonia (CSP)

VariableN (%)
GenderGirls102 (54)
Boys87 (46)
Age< 36 months141 (75)
=>36months48 (25)
WBC<20 X109/l124 (66)
=>20 X109/l65 (34)
C-RPvery high119 (63)
Normal to Moderate70 (37)
Temperature< 40°C109 (58)
=> 40°C80 (42)
C X-rayNegative90 (48)
Positive99 (52)
CultureNegative148 (78.3)
Positive41 (21.7)

Pattern of organisms in the blood culture

The unadjusted association of the six variables with culture positivity is shown in [Table/Fig-3]. Gender and chest X-ray were not significantly associated with positive blood culture (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.6-2.6 and OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8-3.2 respectively). Age (OR 2.7, CI 1.3-5.6), WBC (OR 8.8, CI 4.0-19.4), C-RP (OR 8.7, CI 3.9-19.3) and Temperature (OR 7.4, CI 3.3-16.7) were all significantly associated with a positive culture. However, when all variables were included in a multivariate logistic regression model [Table/Fig-4], the adjusted odds ratios were only significant for WBC ≥20000 cell/L (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-10.9) and temperature ≥40°C (OR 3.1 95% CI 1.2-8.4). The adjusted OR was marginally significant for age (OR 2.4, 95% CI 0.9-5.9, p=0.063).

Unadjusted association of variables with culture positivity

Culture
+ve-veOR95% CIp-value
Age≥36 m17312.71.3-5.6<0.01
<36 m24117
SexFemale24781.30.6-2.6NS
Male1770
WBC>20 X109/l30358.84.0-19.4<0.001
≤20 X109/l11113
C-RPVery high31398.73.9-19.3<0.001
Mod-high10109
Temperature>40 °C32487.43.3-16.7<0.001
≤40 °C9100
C X-ray+ve25741.60.8-3.2NS
-ve1674

Multiple logistic regression showing adjusted or (95% ci) showing association with culture positivity outcome

Variable(Ref. group)OR (95% CI)p-value
Age≥36 m (<36 =1)2.4 (0.9-5.9)0.063
SexFemale (Male =1)1.7 (0.7-4.1)0.238 NS
WBC>20,000 (≤20,000 =1)3.9 (1.4-10.9)0.009
C-RPVery high (Mod-High =1)2.2 (0.7-2.2)0.168 NS
Temp.>40 °C (≤40 °C =1)3.1 (1.2-8.4)0.021
C X-ray+ve (-ve =1)1.5 (0.6-3.6)0.342 NS

Additional analysis was attempted to assess the validity of certain clinical findings to predict culture positivity, which is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of pneumonia in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each of the six variables [Table/Fig-5]. The best performing variables were WBC, C-RP and temperature with a sensitivity of 73.2%, 75.6% and 78.1 and a specificity of 76.4%, 73.3% and 67.7% respectively. The same variables were the best predictors of a positive culture. The positive predictive values were 46.1% (95% CI 37.8-54.7) for WBC, 44.3% (95% CI 36.6-52.3) for C-RP and 40.0% (95%CI 33.4-47.0) for temperature. The negative predictive value was between 91.1% and 91.7% for all of the three variables with negligible difference between the three.

Variables for prediction of culture positivity

VariableSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity % (95% CI)Positive Predictive Value % (95% CI)Negative Predictive Value %
Age41.5%79.1%35.4%83.0%
(27.2-56.9)(71.9-85.0)(25.4-47.0)
Sex58.5%47.3%23.5%80.5%
(43.1-72.8)(39.3-55.4)(18.6-29.3)
WBC73.2%76.4%46.1%91.1%
(58.2-85.0)(69.0-82.7)(37.8-54.7)
C-RP75.6%73.3%44.3%91.6%
(60.8-86.9)(66.1-80.9)(36.6-52.3)
Temperature78.1%67.7%40.0%91.7%
(63.5-88.7)(59.7-74.7)(33.4-47.0)
C X-ray61.0%50.0%25.3%82.2%
(45.5-74.9)(42.0-58.0)(20.1-31.2)

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge this is the first and the only one study addressing predictive factors (clinical or laboratory) of pneumonia in Sudan. In the present study, a high temperature >40°C and an elevated white cell count ≥20000 cell/L were significantly associated with positive blood culture whereas age, gender, elevated C-RP level and chest radiography were not. Sensitivity, specificity, the positive and negative predictive values for prediction of culture positivity was best with high WBC, high C-RP and elevated temperature among children with clinically severe pneumonia.

Few studies had tried to find association with culture positivity with such number of variables. Moreover, the relatively large sample allowed for better statistical results and more stable estimates of significance. However, this study was limited by the low positivity rate of the blood culture in African settings (Schwartz et al.,) [20].

Chest radiograph, in this study, was not a good predictor of culture positivity and hence severe pneumonia. This is in agreement with Hopstaken et al., who observed that chest radiography was an imperfect gold standard for recognition of pneumonia [21]. C-RP association with culture positivity and its predictive value for pneumonia was fairly high in this study. More or less similar results were reported by Koster et al., where not only C-RP but also WBC was found to have a high positive predictive value [22]. However, a lower positive prediction was reported in Mozabique [23]. Koster et al., estimated a positive predictive value for C-RP higher than ours but they reported lower values for the negative predictive value [22]. The predictive values for C-RP, WBC and temperature in our study deserve special attention. They indicate that if these variables are not very high, then the probability that the culture will turn negative, is more than 90% and resorting to culture may well be a wasting of the scarce resources

Temperature of ≥40° C was a significant predictor of a positive culture in this study (Adjusted OR= 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-8.4). A lower similar value {OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.4-3.5) was reported by Michelow et al., [24], however, their sample included all lower respiratory tract infection and their complications as well (i.e. pleural effusion). The age and gender were not significantly associated with a positive blood culture in this study which is consistent with Samir et al., [25].

Our finding suggests that the C-RP is usually high in cases of severe bacterial infection in agreement with a study done previously in Malawi by Diez-Padrisa et al., and by Carrol et al., [26,27]. Markers to predict bacterial infection are highly needed to be employed in many purposes such as the WHO screening program for bacterial vaccine studies, suggested by Madhil et al., and Cheung et al., [28,29]. The data and results in this paper support this hypothesis. Fever and leukocytosis were recommended by Gary in adult patients with severe bacterial infection as a real indication for blood culture which is consistent with this study [30].

Limitations

Such a study usually needs large numbers, utilizing multi-centers and appropriate processing of blood culture in developing countries in general and in Africa in particular. Misuse and non-rational use of antibiotics at reach of patient at any time still hamper the culture results. Inclusion of the children who received prior antibiotics is expected to result in some random misclassification which would only reduce the magnitude of the association. This study would have had an added value if the predictors were used as continuous variables, rather than dichotomous categories to identify a more ideal cut-off point for the temperature, the WBC and the C-RP. Perhaps a lower cut-off point should be used for these variables for screening and prediction of a negative culture. The broad variations in findings from different studies necessitate further research.

Conclusion

This study showed that a temperature of ≥40° C, a WBC of ≥20000 and a high C-reactive protein (C-RP) are significant predictors of a positive blood culture of clinically severe pneumonia. This finding will necessitate admission and empirical treatment without undue waiting for radiology and blood culture reports. The results indicate the independent association of these variables with a positive blood culture result. However, the predictive value of their co-existence was not assessed. On the other hand, chest radiography showed a lower diagnostic value. Nevertheless, urgent empirical treatment for cases of severe pneumonia regardless of eligibility for doing blood culture cannot be over emphasized. More over a search for other tools for accurate investigations should be considered such as PCR.

References

[1]Rudan I, Tomaskovic L, Boschi-Pinto C, Campbell H, Global estimate of the incidence of clinical pneumonia among children under five years of age Bull WHO 2004 82(12):895-903.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Karim Eldin MA, Spectrum of some serious infections caused by Haemophlus Inflenzae type b in children between 2 -59 months in Omdurman Children’s Emergency Hospital, Omdurman, Sudan, Thesis submitted for Clinical MD in Paediatric and Child Health 2004 University of Khartoum:75  [Google Scholar]

[3]Levine OS, Liu G, Garman RL, Dewell SF, Yu S, Yang Y, Haemophilus influenzae type b and Streptococcus pneumonia as a causes of pneumonia among children in Beijing, China Emerg Infect Dis 2000 6(2):2  [Google Scholar]

[4]Vuori-Holopainen E, Peltola H, Reappraisal of lung tap: review of an old method for better aetiologic diagnoses of childhood pneumonia Clin infect Dis 2001 32(5):715-26.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Korppi M, Kröger L, C-Reactive protein in viral and bacterial respiratory infection in children Scand. J Infect Dis 1992 25:207-13.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Bachur R, Perry H, Harper MB, Occult pneumonias: empiric chest radiographs in febrile children with leukocytosis Ann Emerg Med 1999 33(2):166-73.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Murphy CG, van de Pol AC, Harper MB, Bachur RG, Clinical predictors of occult pneumonia in the febrile child Acad Emerg Med 2007 14(3):243-49.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Rutman MS, Bachur R, Harper MB, Radiographic pneumonia in young, highly febrile children with leukocytosis before and after universal conjugate pneumococcal vaccination Pediatr Emerg Care 2009 25(1):1-7.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Coote N, McKenzie S, Diagnosis and investigation of bacterial pneumonias Paediatr Respir Rev 2000 1:8-13.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Churgay CA, The diagnosis and management of bacterial pneumonias in infants and children Prim Care 1996 23:821-35.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Couto RC, Barbosa JA, Pedrosa TM, Biscione FM, C-reactive protein-guided approach may shorten length of antimicrobial treatment of culture-proven late-onset sepsis: an intervention study Braz J Infect Dis 2007 11:240-45.  [Google Scholar]

[12]The forgotten killer of children. WHO, UNICEF. September 2006  [Google Scholar]

[13]Scott JAG, Wonodi C, Moïsi JC, Deloria-Knoll M, DeLuca AN, Karron RA, The Definition of Pneumonia, the Assessment of Severity, and Clinical Standardization in the Pneumonia Aetiology Research for Child Health Study Clin Infect Dis 2012 54(Suppl 2):S109-16.doi: 10.1093/cid/cir1065  [Google Scholar]

[14]World Health Organization Pocket Book of Hospital Care for Children: guidelines for the management of common illnesses with limited reis 2005 Geneva, SwitzerlandWHO  [Google Scholar]

[15]Bradly JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, The management of community- acquired pneumonia in infant and children older than 3 month of age: Clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric infectious Disease Society and the Infectious Disease Society of America Clin infect Dis 2011 53:e25  [Google Scholar]

[16]Harris M, Clark J, Coote N, British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in Children: update 2011 Thorax 2011 66(ii1)  [Google Scholar]

[17]Cherian T, Mulholland EK, Carlin JB, Standardized interpretation of paediatric chest radiographs for the diagnosis of pneumonia in epidemiological studies Bull WHO 2005 83:353-59.  [Google Scholar]

[18]IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Release 2012  [Google Scholar]

[19]Mantel N, Haenszel W, Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease JNCI 1969 22:719-48.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Schwarz NG, Sarpong N, Hunger F, Systemic bacteraemia in children presenting with clinical pneumonia and the impact of non-typhoid salmonella (NTS) BMC Infect Dis 2010 10:319  [Google Scholar]

[21]Hopstaken RM, Witbraad T, van Engelshoven JMA, Dinant GJ, Inter-observer variation in the interpretation of chest radiographs for pneumonia in community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections Clin Radiol 2004 59(8):743-52.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Koster MJ, Broekhuizen BDL, Minnaard MC, Balemans WAF, Hopstaken RM, de Jong PA, Verheij TJM, Diagnostic properties of C-reactive protein for detecting pneumonia in children Resp Med 2013 107(7):1087-93.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Díez-Padrisa N, Bassat Q, Morais L, O’Callaghan-Gordo C, Machevo S, Nhampossa T, Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as predictors of blood culture positivity among hospitalised children with severe pneumonia in Mozambique Trop Med Int Hlth 2012 17(9):1100-07.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Michelow IC, Olsen K, Lozano J, Rollins NK, Duffy LB, Ziegler T, Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children Pediatrics 2004 113(4):701-7.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Shah SS, Dugan MH, Bell LM, Grundmeier RW, Florin TA, Hines EM, Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department Evaluation of Childhood Pneumonia Pediatr Infect Dis J 2011 30(6):475-79.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Diez-Padrisa N, Bassat Q, Machevo S, Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for invasive bacterial pneumonia diagnosis among children in Mozambique, a malaria-endemic area PLoS ONE 2010 5:e13226  [Google Scholar]

[27]Carrol ED, Mankhambo LA, Jeffers G, The diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of five markers of serious bacterial infection in Malawian children with signs of severe infection PLoS ONE 2009 4:e6621  [Google Scholar]

[28]Madhi SA, Heera JR, Kuwanda L, Klugman KP, Use of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein to evaluate vaccine efficacy against pneumonia PLoS Medicine 2005 2:e38  [Google Scholar]

[29]Cheung YB, Zaman SM, Ruopuro ML, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in the evaluation of the efficacy of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Gambian children Tropical Medicine and International Health 2008 13:603-11.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Coburn B, Morris AM, Tomlinson G, Detsky AS, Does this adult patient with suspected bacteremia require blood cultures? JAMA 2012 308:502  [Google Scholar]