Microbiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10284.5220
Year : 2014 | Month : Nov | Volume : 8 | Issue : 11 Page : DD03 - DD04

Neonatal Septicaemia Caused by Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus Faecium-A Case Report

Shantala GB1, Nagarathnamma T2, Pooja DR3, Harsha TR4, Karthik R5

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
2 Professor and Head of Department, Department of Microbiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
3 Post Graduate, Department of Microbiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
5 Post Graduate, Department of Microbiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Shantala GB, No.186, 3rd Main, M S Ramaiah City, J.P.Nagar, 8th phase, Bangalore-560076, India. Phone : 919448078081, E-mail : drshantalagb@gmail.com
Abstract

Neonatal bacterial sepsis is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in neonates. 10% cases of neonatal bacteraemia and septicaemia are caused by Enterococci. The increasing incidence of Vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) is of particular concern because of limited treatment options and increased mortality. We report here a case of neonatal sepsis in a premature baby caused by vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium Van A phenotype from a tertiary care Hospital in South India. A preterm baby boy with low birth weight was admitted to the NICU with Respiratory distress and meconium aspiration. On 5th day the baby succumbed to death and a final diagnosis of respiratory distress and meconium aspiration with sepsis was made. Blood cultures sent yielded vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium (minimum inhibitory concentration ≥ 256 μg/ml). It was confirmed as Enterococcus feacium Van A phenotype by Automated Vitek system.

How to cite this article

Shantala GB, Nagarathnamma T, Pooja DR, Harsha TR, Karthik R, .NEONATAL SEPTICAEMIA CAUSED BY VANCOMYCIN RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM-A CASE REPORT.Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [serial online]2014 Nov[cited:2019 Sep 17] 11 DD03 - DD04
 Available from
http://www.jcdr.net//back_issues.asp

Case Report

A preterm baby boy with birth weight of 1.75 kg was born to a Primigravida by normal delivery at 34 wks of gestation at Vani Vilas Hospital attached to Bangalore Medical college and Research Institute, Bangalore, in January 2014. The mother was diagnosed with Pregnancy induced Hypertension on admission. It was a High risk pregnancy with premature rupture of membranes. The baby cried immediately after birth, however developed respiratory distress with meconium aspiration and was shifted to NICU. The temperature was 36.50C, heart rate 80/min, Respiratory rate 70/min, perfusion <3 sec. Systemic examination of CVS,CNS & reflexes were normal.

The baby was started on empirical antibiotics inj. ampicillin (60mg, 8th hourly) & inj. gentamicin(15 mg,24th hourly) initially, however in view of poor response the same were switched over to parenteral ceftriaxone (175mg,IV,12th hourly), Vancomycin (25mg,12th hourly) & amikacin (25 mg, 24th hourly). Despite therapy, there was no clinical improvement, respiratory distress worsened, baby developed cyanosis with decrease in SpO2 to 70% and perfusion >3secs. The baby was intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure. The investigations revealed normocytic normochromic blood picture with thrombocytopenia and reactive CRP. The respiratory course continued to deteriorate with worsening saturation and inspite of intensive neonatal care baby succumbed to death on 5th day. A final diagnosis of Respiratoy distress syndrome with Meconium aspiration syndrome with septic shock was made.

Blood cultures sent on 3rd day yielded Enterococcus faecium. The identification of the isolate was done by standard methods [1,2]. Antibiotic sensitivity by standard Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, showed the isolate to be resistant to penicillin(10 units), erythromycin (15μg), high level gentamicin (120μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), vancomycin (30μg) and teicoplanin (30μg) but susceptible to linezolid (30μg). The isolate possessed high-level resistance to vancomycin; the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the strain to vancomycin was ≥256 μg/ml by E test (BioMërieux).The identification and sensitivity of the isolate were confirmed by Automated system (BioMërieux-Vitek, USA). Based on its high-level resistance to vancomycin and resistance to teicoplanin, the strain was designated as belonging to Van A phenotype.

Discussion

Enterococci have evolved over the past few decades from being harmless intestinal commensals of little clinical significance to becoming the second or third most common pathogens associated with nosocomial infection. Among various species of Enterococcus, E.feacalis and E. faecium are the most common human pathogens. Serious enterococcal infections are often difficult to treat since the organisms exhibit intrinsic resistance to penicillinase susceptible penicillin (low level), penicillinase resistant penicillins, cephalosporins, lincosamides, nalidixic acid, low level of aminoglycoside and low level of clindamycin. They have a tremendous capacity to acquire resistance to penicillin by β-lactamases, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, high level of clindamycin, high level aminoglycosides (HLAR), tetracycline and fluroquinolone, thus drastically limiting therapeutic options [3,4]. Vancomycin resistant Enterococci (VRE) sepsis is emerging as a significant problem in the intensive care setting. The infection can be acquired from the carrier mother or as cross infection from the hospital (nosocomial)[5]. The treatment at any age is challenging, but there is a dearth of information on the cause of infection and its treatment in premature infant. Moreover the transfer of plasmids carrying resistance genes to Staphylococcus aureus is a matter of grave concern.

The case described here has several risk factors for acquisition of VRE like those reported earlier. The neonate had Immunosuppression or debilitation because of prematurity, respiratory tract instrumentation, ICU stay and use of broad spectrum antibiotics especially third generation cephalosporins [6,7]. The VRE strain in the present case was isolated from blood culture which may have contributed to the fatal outcome with underlying predisposing conditions.

Enterococci are among the first bacteria to colonize the neonatal gastrointestinal tract either through oral ingestion of breast milk or from the vaginal and gastrointestinal flora of the mother during the birth passage [7]. The present case is early onset sepsis and the baby would have acquired enterococci from the vaginal flora of the mother. Use of Broad spectrum antibiotics in the present case may have resulted in antibiotic selection pressure on the bowel inhabitants resulting in increased survival and overgrowth of the resistant population. VRE may thus have colonized the GIT or skin and subsequently resulted in infection. VRE may spread through direct contact with contaminated environmental surface and hands of health care workers [3]. We can only speculate about the source of this strain, as neither the skin/ rectal swabs of the neonate nor could maternal blood culture, vaginal swab culture or screening of stool for Enterococci be done. The skin or rectal swabs could not be taken as the baby succumbed to death even before the culture report of the isolation of VRE could be communicated to the attending paediatrician.

It is important to speciate enterococcal isolates from clinical samples because, while most isolates of E. faecalis are inhibited by concentrations of penicillin or ampicillin (1 to 8 μg/ml) easily achievable in humans, isolates of E. faecium are more resistant to penicillins, requiring an average of 16 to 64 μg/ml to inhibit growth, although some isolates are even more resistant. Enterococcus faecium strains as compared to E. faecalis display a higher degree of drug resistance to multiple other antibiotics as well, including ampicillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin and teicoplanin [8,9]. Failure to recognize the resistant strains may result in inadequate antibiotic therapy with its attendant morbidity and mortality.

Seven types of glycopeptides resistance have been described among enterococci: Van A and Van B are considered the most clinically relevant phenotypes and are usually associated with E.faecalis and E.faecium isolates. Van A phenotype confers high level resistance to vancomycin(MIC>64mcg/ml) and teicoplannin(MIC>32 mcg/ml)and is usually seen in E.faecium [7]. In India, VanA VRE has been reported mainly in E. faecalis [1012]. Mohanty et al., first documented isolation of vancomycin- resistant E. faecium of VanA phenotype from a 3-year-old child with PDA in India [3].

The primary therapeutic options for patients with VRE infection include quinupristin/dalfopristin and Linezolid, but the use of quinupristin/dalfopristin is limited because of its adverse effects profile, need for a central line and because of its lack of coverage against Enterococcus faecalis. Linezolid is active against E. faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. Hapnes et al., reported a case of Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium in a 10 d old infant who was successfully treated with Linezolid [13]. Vidya mave et al., have studied the effectiveness of Daptomycin in treatment of vancomycin resistant enterococcal bacteraemia and concluded that in the case of patients intolerant to linezolid, daptomycin may be considered as an alternative for the treatment of VRE bacteraemia [14]. Beneri et al., reported a case of persistent bacteraemia with Vancomycin resistant E.faecium in a neonate successfully treated with daptomycin containing regimen [15]. The choice of antibiotics should also be based susceptibility reports, type of infection being treated (endocarditis versus urinary tract infection), the severity of the infection and clinical response to the regimen chosen.

Conclusion

In India, Van A VRE has been reported mainly in E.faecalis. There are very few case reports of Neonatal sepsis caused by Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium which made us report this case stressing the need for strict enforcement of infection control practices. The Microbiology Laboratory plays a pivotal role in early detection and reporting of VRE. In addition, close liaison between the clinicians and the microbiologists will facilitate a significant reduction in mortality and morbidity caused by VRE. The emergence & spread of these pathogens can be significantly curtailed if appropriate infection control procedures, strict enforcement of antibiotic policies and screening programs are implemented immediately.

References

[1]Washington W, Stephen A, William J, Elmer K, Gary P, Paul S, Koneman’s Colour Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology 2006 6th edPhildelphiaLippincott Williams and Wilkins:859-940.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Colle JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, Mackie and McCortney Practical Medical Microbiology 2006 14th edAmsterdamElsevier:263-73.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Mohanty S, Dhawan B, Gadepalli RS, Lodha R, Kapil A, Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Faecium Van A phenotype: First documented isolation in India Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2006 37(2):335-37.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Marothi YA, Agnihotri H, Dubey D, Enterococcal resistance:an overview Indian J Med Microbiol 2005 23(4):214-19.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Choudhry O, Gathwala G, Singh J, Vancomycin resistant Enterococci in neonatal ICU-A Rising menace Indian Journal of Pediatrics 2010 77:1446-47.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Cetinkaya Y, Falk P, Mayhall CG, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci Clin Microbiol Rev 2000 13:686-707.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Sharma M, Yadav A, Yadav S, Enterococcal neonatal Septicaemia International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences 2012 3(3:(B)):781-86.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Murray BE, Vancomycin-resistant enterococci Am J Med 1997 102:284-93.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Udo EE, Al-Sweih N, Philips OA, Chugh TD, Species prevalence and antibacterial resistance of enterococci isolated in Kuwait hospitals J Med Microbiol 2003 52:163-68.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Karmarkar MG, Gershom ES, Mehta PR, Enterococcal infections with special reference to phenotypic characterization and drug resistance Indian J Med Res 2004 119:22-25.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Mathur P, Kapil A, Chandra R, Sharma P, Das B, Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus faecalis at a tertiary care centre of northern India Indian J Med Res 2003 118:25-28.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Taneja N, Rani P, Emmanuel R, Sharma M, Significance of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from urinary specimens at a tertiary care centre in northern India Indian J Med Res 2004 119:727-24.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Hapnes N, Twomey A, Knowles S, Persistent Vancomycin and High-Level Gentamicin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteraemia and Intra-Aortic Thrombus in an Extremely Low Birth-Weight Infant Journal of Perinatology: Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association 2009 :01-01.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Mave V, Diaz JG, Islam T, Hasbun R, Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia: is daptomycin as effective as linezolid? J Antimicrob Chemotherapy 2009 64(1):175-80.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Beneri CA, Nicolau DP, Seiden HS, Rubin LG, Successful treatment of a neonate with persistent vancomycin resistant enterococcal bacteremia with a daptomycin-containing regimen Infection and Drug Resistance 2008 1:9-11.  [Google Scholar]