JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Microbiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9594.5048
Year : 2014 | Month : Oct | Volume : 8 | Issue : 10 Full Version Page : DC08 - DC11

Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of ESβL Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Urine Samples of Pregnant Women in Karnataka

Manjula N G1, Girish C Math2, Kavita Nagshetty3, Shripad A Patil4, Subhashchandra M Gaddad5, Channappa T Shivannavar6

1 Research Scholar, Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Microbiology, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, India.
2 Research Scholar, Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Microbiology, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, India.
3 Guest Faculty, Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Microbiology, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, India.
4 Additional Professor, Department of Neuromicrobiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
5 Professor, Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Microbiology, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, India.
6 Professor, Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Microbiology, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Channappa T. Shivannavar, Professor, Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Microbiology, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga, India. Phone : 9481640497, E-mail : ctshiv@gmail.com
Abstract

Background:Klebsiella pneumoniae possess a new problem to health care professionals worldwide, which complicates and limits therapeutic options. It is one of the leading nosocomial bacterial pathogens, and the present study aims to determine the prevalence of ESβL producing K. pneumoniae isolates with their antibiotic susceptibility pattern in urine samples of the pregnant women with UTI.

Materials and Methods: Using standard isolation and identification procedures a total of 41 isolates were obtained from 417 midstream urine samples of pregnant women with suspected UTI in Karnataka. The antibiotic resistance profile of each isolate was performed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and ESβL production by standard phenotypic method.

Results: Isolation rate of K. pneumoniae in pregnant women was 19.9% and overall incidence rate was 9.8%. Among the 41 K. pneumoniae isolates, 26 (63.4%) were ESβL producers and all were found to be Multi Drug Resistance (MDR). The antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) for the isolates revealed that the highest number of K. pneumoniae were resistant to ampicillin (75.6%) followed by, nitrofurontoin and cefuroxime (73.1%) and least to chloramphenicol (12.1%). ESβL producers were highly resistance to nitrofurontoin (69.2%) and cotrimonazole (65.2%) and lower resistance was (7.6%) to amaikacin, observed. A higher resistance pattern to these two antibiotics was observed against ESβL non producing K. pneumonia but lowest to polymyxin B (13.3%) instead of amikacin (26.6%). All the isolates were found to be susceptible to imipenem.

Conclusion: Present investigation revealed high prevalence of MDR- ESβL producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, which indicates dire need for effective ESβL surveillance in the community by using cost effective antimicrobials agents.

Keywords

Introduction

Despite the widespread availability of antibiotics, UTI remains the most common bacterial infections in the human population. Incidences of UTIs are more in women than men and it was reported that upto 15% of women will have one episode of UTI at some time during their life [1]. The incidence of UTI reported among pregnant women is 8-10% [1]. If not treated asymptomatic bacteriuria increases the frequency of premature delivery and neonates with low birth weight [2] and also is likely to cause acute pyelonephritis at a rate of 20 to 30% [3].

During pregnancy UTI are more frequently caused by the indigenous microfllora especially from gastrointestinal tracts. Members belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae are the most frequent pathogens (84.3%) detected in UTI cases and E. coli alone accounts for 80-90% [4]. Klebsiellapneumoniae is a successful opportunistic pathogen that has been associated with various ailments such as urinary tract infection, pneumonia, septicaemia, respiratory tract infection, wound infections and diarrhoea [5]. K. pneumoniae have become important pathogens in nosocomial infections [6], leading to more morbidity and mortality, which has been well documented in US and India [7]. In the United States, it accounts for 3-7% of all nosocomial bacterial infections, placing them among the eight most important infectious pathogens in hospitals [8]. Prevalence of K. pneumoniae has been reported to be 20.96% in Southern India [9].

Even though, K. pneumoniae accounts for only 10-15% of the total UTIs throughout the world, it occupies second place after E. coli among uropathogens. Infections caused by Klebsiella are treated with broad spectrum of antibiotics such as, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and carbapenems [10] and it has been found that resistance has developed to these antibiotics [11]. Resistance to beta-lactams has been reported to be associated with ESβL [12], which hydrolyze oxyimino beta-lactams like cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and monobactams, but have no effect on cephamycins, carbapenems and related compounds [13]. ESβL producing Klebsiella sps in this part of the world has been observed by several workers; its prevalence reported to be more than 55% [11]. Studies have reported high prevalence of ESβL-producing members of family Enterobacteriaceae in India, where use of antimicrobials is relatively unrestricted. Indian studies have reported 26 to 48% of uropathogens belonging to Enterobacteriaceae were ESβL producers [14]. A recent report, from a hospital in rural Southern India, described a high prevalence of ESβL producers [15], while other report showed 96.1%[9].

Antimicrobial therapy is initiated in UTI even before the reports of urine culture are available. It is necessary to treat UTI in pregnancy as it is essential to maintain sterile urine without causing toxicity to the foetus, and there is no consensus on the choice of antimicrobials, duration of therapy or on prophylactic use of antimicrobials in pregnancy [16]. The aim of the study is to determine the incidence of K. pneumoniae in pregnant women with suspected UTI antibiotic profile of ESβL producers.

Materials and Methods

Study was conducted on pregnant women suspected with signs and symptoms of UTI or symptomatic urinary tract infection characterized by frequency, urgency, dysuria, or supra pubic pain in a woman with a normal genitourinary tract as in uncomplicated UTI and complicated UTI with functional or structural abnormalities of the genitourinary tract which involve either the bladder or kidneys [17,18].

Urine samples were collected from the pregnant women attending Government and Private hospitals/clinics and pathological laboratories in Gulbarga, Belgaum and Bangalore regions of Karnataka, Southern India during the period from December 2009 to August 2011.

Isolation and Identification of Uropathogens

Diagnosis of UTI was based on the microscopic findings of more than 10 pus cells/ high power field (40X) in centrifuged urine. Further, uropathogens were isolated from freshly voided midstream urine samples by inoculating with calibrated loop on nutrient agar plate, which were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24h and extended to 48h in culture (growth) negative cases. Colonies were further identified and characterized based on morphological and biochemical tests [19]. As recommended by Kass [20] in distinguishing genuine infection from contamination, culture of a single bacterial species from urine sample at a concentration of >105 CFU/ml was included in the study. Isolated and characterized uropathogens were preserved on agar slants at 4°C and nutrient broth containing 25% glycerol at -20°C.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

The 17 antibiotics of different classes (groups) with concentration in mcg/disc used in this study were taken as shown in [Table/Fig-1]. Antimicrobial susceptibility of each isolate was tested by following the CLSI guidelines on Mueller Hinton agar [21]. Antibiotic strength in discs used as recommended by CLSI. All chemicals required for culture media, reagents and antibiotic discs were procured from HiMedia laboratories Pvt Ltd., Mumbai.

Percent resistance of K. pneumoniae isolates against each antibiotic

AntibioticsConcentration (mcg/disc)No: of isolates resistant to antibioticsPercent resistance
Amikacin30614.6%
Ampicillin103175.6%
Aztreonam302765.8%
Azithromycin151536.5%
Cefepime302253.6%
Cefotaxime302663.4%
Cefoxitin301741.4%
Cefuroxime303073.1%
Chloramphenicol30512.1%
Ciprofloxacin301536.5%
Cotrimoxazole252868.2%
Gentamicin101536.5%
Imipenem1000%
Nitrofurontoin303073.1%
Piperacillin/tazobactam100/101639.0%
Polymyxin B300 units921.9%
Tetracycline301946.3%

Detection of ES βL producing K pneumoniae

ESβL producing K. pneumoniae isolates were determined using double disc synergy test recommended by CLSI guidelines [21]. The test organisms were grown in Luria Bertani broth and log phase was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland’s standard, and inoculated on the Mueller Hinton agar plate with sterile cotton swab. Then discs of cefotaxime (30 mg) and ceftazidime (30 mg) separately and each of these in combination with clavulanic acid (10 mg) were placed 20mm apart on the surface of the agar plates preincoculated with test cultures and incubated at 37°C for 18h. Increase of inhibition zone diameter by ≥ 5mm around the antibiotic disc in combination with clavulanic acid compared to antibiotic alone was considered as ESβL producers. E. coli ATCC 25922 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 were used as standards.

Results

Overall 206 uropathogens were isolated from 417 samples collected from the UTI suspected pregnant women. Majority of isolates belonged to Enterobacteriaceae family, among them E. coli isolation rate was highest (56.79%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.9%), Further the frequency of K. pneumoniae isolation rate increased with age of pregnancy. It was observed that the prevalence was highest at 8th month of pregnancy (31.7%), followed by 22% in the 6th month. Least prevalence was observed at 4.8% at 4th month of pregnancy [Table/Fig-2]. No clinical correlation has been done.

Frequency of K. pneumoniae isolated in relation to different month of pregnancy

Month of pregnancyNo: of K. pneumoniae isolatesPercent of K. pneumoniae isolated
300
424.8
537.31
6922
7819.5
81331.7
9614.6
Total4199.9

The susceptibility pattern of all the Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in the study revealed that highest number of 75.6% isolates showed resistance to ampicillin, followed by cefuroxime and nitrofurontoin (73.1%) and lowest to chloramphenicol (12.1%). Low to moderate level of resistance was exhibited to the other antibiotics and all the isolates were (100%) susceptible to imipenem [Table/Fig-1].

Out of 41 K. pneumoniae isolates 90.2% were found to be multidrugresistant (MDR), defined as resistant to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes. Majority of them were resistant to 8 or more antibiotics (78%). The maximum of 8 (19.5%) K. pneumoniae isolates were found to be resistant to 10 and 11 antibiotics [Table/Fig-3].

Multidrug resistance pattern of K. pneumoniae isolates

No: of antibioticsNo: of K. pneumoniae isolates (%)
40 (0)
53 (7.3)
60 (0)
72 (4.8)
83 (7.3)
93 (7.3)
108 (19.5)
118 (19.5)
125 (12.1)
133 (7.3)
141 (2.4)
151 (2.4)
Total MDR isolates37 (90.2%)

ESβL phenotypic detection test showed 9.8% of K. pneumoniae isolates were ESβL producers and maximum of them showed high resistance to nitrofurantoin (69.2%) followed by, cotrimoxazole (65.3%), tetracycline (53.8%), gentamicin and chloramphenicol (46.1%) as compared to amikacin (7.6 %) [Table/Fig-4].

Comparison of susceptibility to antibiotics between ESβL producers and ESβL non producer K. pneumoniae isolates

ANTIBIOTICSESβL producers (n =26) (63.4 %)Non ESβL producers (n= 15) (36.5%)
SensitiveResistantSensitiveResistant
Gentamicin14 (53.8%)12 (46.1%)12 (80%)3 (20%)
Amaikacin24 (92.3%)2 (7.6%)11 (73.3%)4 (26.6%)
Ciprofloxacin14 (53.8%)12 (46.1%)12 (80%)3 (20%)
Polymyxin B19 (73%)7 (26.9%)13 (86.6%)2 (13.3%)
Tetracycline12 (46.1%)14 (53.8%)10 (66.6%)5 (33.3%)
Nitrofurontoin8 (30.7%)18 (69.2%)3 (20%)12 (80%)
Cotrimonazole9 (34.6%)17 (65.3%)4 (26.6%)11 (73%)
Azithromycin16 (61.5%)10 (38.4%)10 (66.6%)5 (33.3%)
Chloramphenicol22 (84.6%)4 (15.3%)14 (93.3%)1 (6.6%)

Discussion

In the present study, of the 417 urine samples from pregnant women suspected with UTI, 49.4% samples were culture positive while, incidence of K. pneumoniae accounted for 19.9% and the overall prevalence rate of K. pneumoniae in pregnant women with UTI was found to be 9.8%.

In our study K. pneumoniae has shown high antibiotic resistance which is in similarity with the study reported by Tonkic et al., [22]. Carbapenems are the drugs of choice for many infections caused by Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria and were found to be the most effective antibiotics, and our study revealed 100% susceptible whereas, consistent rise was observed with other studies [23]. Maximum isolates of K.pneumoniae (75.6%) were resistance to ampicillin as comparable with other studies [24]. Cephalosporins, particularly second and third generation have been used to treat Klebsiella pneumoniae infections [25]. Low resistance to second and third generation cephalosporins (63.4%) is seen in our studies compared to (84%) other reports [26]. Aminoglycosides have shown good activity against clinically important Gram negative bacilli [27]. In our study 14.6% and 36.5% of K pneumoniae isolates wrer resistant to amikacin and gentamicin resistance in contrast to other studies were 39.10% to amikacin and 16.70% to gentamicin in Klebsiella [28].

The resistance rate in K. pneumoniae isolates was 36.5% to ciprofloxacin which is lower than other studies conducted in India [27] and higher than reported in USA [28].

Multi-drug resistance (MDR) is a major problem in the management of uropathogens [29]. This MDR may be due to plasmids harboring several resistance genes which are transferred from one bacterium to another [29] and have linked such resistance pattern to the presence of integrons [30]. Multidrug Resistance (MDR) in K. pneumoniae is increasing throughout the world [31]. In our studies 90.2% isolates were MDR as reported by others with 100% multidrug resistance [31].

Prevalence of ESβL has been reported 40%, 58% and 58.7% from Iran Pakistan and India respectively [11,15,32]. In our study, 26(63%) K. pneumoniae isolates were ESβL producers and have higher antibiotic resistance to ampicillin and cephalosporins, which are important drugs for the treatment of UTIs. Our results showed ESβL producing K. pneumoniae susceptibile to nitrofurontoin (30.7%), amaikacin (92.3%) and imipenem (100%), whereas, other studies in India showed 100%, 89% and 86% respectively [11]. Another study revealed 48.1% susceptibility to amakacin, 81.4% to imipenem and 25.9% to ciprofloxacin [32], whereas, our studies revealed 53.8% susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. Such isolates are also resistant to flouroquinolones, tetracyclines and cotrimoxazole. Ampicillin, gentamycin, cephalosporin group and nitrofurontion are the choice of drugs during pregnancy.

Untreated UTI may lead to pre-term premature rupture of membrane, maternal chorioamnionitis, intrauterine growth retardation, and low birth weight baby. Early treatment with antibiotics reduces the above complications. Strict antibiotic policy should be adopted in hospitals to estimate the impact of higher resistance in bacteria and to take steps for reducing this resistance.

References

[1]Delzell JE, Lefevre ML, Urinary tract infections during pregnancy Am Fam Physician 2000 61(3):713-21.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Kahlmeter G, THE ECO-SENS project. A prospective multinational multicenter epidemiological survey of the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary tract pathogens J Antimicrob Chemother 2000 46:15-22.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Raz R, Chazan B, Dan M, Cranberry juice and urinary tract infection Clin Infect Dis 2004 38:1413-19.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Gales CA, Jones RN, Gordon KA, Sader HS, Wilke WW, Beach ML, Activity and spectrum of 22 antimicrobial agents tested against urinary tract infection pathogens in hospitalised patients in Latin America; reports from the second year of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998) J Antimicrob. Chemothrep 2000 45(3):295-303.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Podschun R, Ullmann U, Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors Clin Microbiol Rev 1998 11(4):589-603.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Nordamann P, Cuzon G, Naas T, The real threat of Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase -producing bacteria Lancet Infec Dis 2009 9(4):228-36.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Mathur NB, Khalib A, Sarkar R, Puri RK, Mortality in neonatal septicaaemia with involvement of mother in management Ind J Pediatri 1991 28:1259-64.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Sarathbabu R, Ramani TV, Rao Bhaskara K, Panda Supriya, Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from sputum, urine and pus samples IOSR J Pharma Biol Sci 2012 1(2):4-9.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Gaddad SM, Muzaheed Shivannavar CT, Incidence of ESBL producing Klebsiella pneumoniae among inpatients and outpatients from North eastern part of Karnataka Res Rev Bioscience 2008 2(2-6):160-63.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Roussel-Delvallez M, Wallet F, Bactericidal activity of three betalactams alone or in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor and two aminoglycosides against Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring extended-spectrum beta-lactamases Clin Microbiol Infect 1998 4(10):570-76.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Jain A, Mondal R, Prevalence & antimicrobial resistance pattern of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Klebsiella spp isolated from cases of neonatal septicaemia Indian J Med Res 2007 125(1):89-94.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Babini GS, Livermore DM, Antimicrobial resistance amongst Klebsiella sps collected from intensive care units in Southern and Western Europe in 1997-1998 J Antimicrob Chemother 2000 45(2):183-87.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Philippon A, Labia R, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989 33(8):1131-36.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Babypadmini S, Appalaraju B, Extended spectrum β lactamases in urinary isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae - Prevalence and susceptibility pattern in a tertiary care hospital Indian J Med Microbiol 2004 22(3):172-74.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Navaneeth BV, Extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamases in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from a rural South Indian tertiary care hospital Int J Antimicrob Agents 2007 29:602-03.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Beckford-Ball J, Related Articles, Management of suspected Bacterial urinary tract infection Nurs Times 2006 102(32):25-26.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Hooton TM, Stamm WE, Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997 11:551-82.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Nicolle LE, A practical approach to the management of complicated urinary tract infection Drugs Aging 2001 18:243  [Google Scholar]

[19]Cheesbrough M, Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries. Vol II. Microbiology 1989 Cambridge, Great Britain:248-63.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Giron E, Rioux C, Brun-Buisson C, Lobel B, Infection committee of the French Association of Urology. The Postoperative bacteriuria score; a new way to predict nosocomial infection after prostate surgery Infect Control Hosp Epidemol 2006 27(8):847-54.  [Google Scholar]

[21]CLSI 2006. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Performance Standard for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 16th Informational supplement. CLSI document. M100-S16  [Google Scholar]

[22]Tonkic M, Goic-Barisic I, Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated in a university hospital in Split, Croatia Int Microbiol 2005 8(2):119-24.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Nicolau DP, Carbapenems: a potent class of antibiotics Expert Opin Pharmacother 2008 9(1):23-37.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Aktas E, Yigit N, Detection of antimicrobial resistance and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Klebsiella pneumonia strains from infected neonates J Int Med Res 2002 30(4):445-48.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Jett BD, Ritchie DJ, In vitro activities of various beta-lactam antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. resistant to oxyimino cephalosporins Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995 39(5):1187-90.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Singh NP, Goyal R, Changing trends in bacteriology of burns in the burns unit, Delhi, India Burns 2003 29(2):129-32.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Revathi G, Puri J, Bacteriology of burns Burns 1998 24(4):347-49.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Fedler KA, Biedenbach DJ, Assessment of pathogen frequency and resistance patterns among pediatric patient isolates: report from the 2004 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program on 3 continents Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2006 56(4):427-36.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Akram M, Shahid M, Etiology and antibiotic resistance pattern of community-acquired urinary tract infections in JNMC Hospital Aligarh, India Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2007 6:4  [Google Scholar]

[30]Mathai E, Grape M, Integrons and multidrug resistance among Escherichia coli causing community-acquired urinary tract infection in southern India APMIS 2004 112(3):159-64.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Tokatlidou D, Tsivitanidou M, Outbreak caused by a multidrugresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clone carrying blaVIM-12 in a university hospital J Clin Microbiol 2008 46(3):1005-08.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Ullah Farhat, Mallik Salman Akbar, Ahmed Jawas, Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in Klebsiella pneumoniae from urinary tract infections in North-West of Pakistan African Journal of Microbiology 2009 3(11):676-80.  [Google Scholar]