JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Dentistry DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6987.4161
Year : 2014 | Month : Mar | Volume : 8 | Issue : 3 Full Version Page : 199 - 201

A Changing Trend In Eruption Age and Pattern of First Deciduous Tooth: Correlation to Feeding Pattern

Monika V Kohli1, Gururaj B. Patil2, Narayan B. Kulkarni3, Kishore Bagalkot4, Zarana Purohit5, Nilixa Dave6, Shitalkumar G Sagari7, Manjunath Malaghan8

1 Private Practitioner, The Cure Orthodontic Clinic, Sama, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
2 Reader, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Pariyaram Dental College, Pariyaram, Kannur, Kerala, India.
3 Reader, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. K.M.Shah Dental College And Hospital Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
4 Reader, Department of Orthodontics, Al-Ameen Dental College, Athani Road, Bijapur, Karnataka.
5 IIIrd Year Post Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, K.M.Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidhyapeeth, Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
6 IInd Year Post Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, K.M.Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidhyapeeth, Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
7 Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Jodhpur Dental College General Hospital, Jodhpur National University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
8 Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedIcs, Kle Vk Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr Gururaj B. Patil, Pariyaram Dental College, Pariyaram, Kannur, Kerala-670503, India.
Phone: +91-9844170766,
E-mail: drgururajpatil@gmail.com
Abstract

Background: Feeding mode during infancy and its effect on deciduous tooth appearance in oral cavity in two generations and among genders.

Aim and Objective: Study aimed to compare and correlate times and patterns of deciduous tooth eruption in breastfeeding (OBF), partial breastfeeding (PBF) and spoon feeding (SF) infants and initiation of semisolid food feeding (SSF) in infants. It also aimed to address the variations in the time of eruption of first deciduous tooth and its pattern in two generations who had more than a decade of difference in ages.

Materials and methods: An open-ended questionnaire study was conducted on mothers of 265 patients from two groups, generation 1 (G1)- adults who were aged 20-35 years and divond group, generation 2 (G2) - children who were below 5 years of age .

Results: A statistical significance was observed with respect to age, gender, generations, and frequency of breastfeeding, partial breastfeeding and time of initiation of semisolid food.

Conclusion: There is a delayed eruption of teeth in present generation. For girls, it occurs at age of 7.88 months and for boys, it occurs at the age of 8.08 months.

Keywords

Introduction

Eruption of first deciduous tooth in oral cavity teeth at the age of six to ten months is an important event in a child’s development [1]. Literatures suggest that there is a correlation of the dental age with the chronological age of a child [2,3]. Failure of eruption or delayed eruption suggests many underlying pathologies [4]. This will lead to futile investigations like intra-oral radiographic examinations which are done for determining the cause of the delay in eruption of the first teeth [5]. Several evolutionary changes are observed in human dentition [2,5] eruption may also be show some changes over a period of time [5,6]. A change in the timing of eruption of first deciduous tooth has been observed in the present generation [79].

Infants and babies will gradually shift from exclusive breastfeeding or only breast feeding to partial breastfeeding. Later on, they will shift to spoon feeding, followed by semisolid food in the first few years of their lives. Exclusive breastfeeding and partial breastfeeding habits have many impacts on orofacial development and eruption of deciduous and permanent dentitions [4,1012].

Current study was carried out to find out whether there were changes in eruption times and patterns of first deciduous teeth, in two generations who had over a decade's age difference between them. We also aimed to check for any correlation of infant feeding patterns on appearance of deciduous teeth in oral cavity. We could not find any study which was done on changing trends in eruption times and patterns of first deciduous teeth in present generation among Indian population.

Methodology

A cross-sectional, open ended questionnaire study was conducted from 2010 to 2012 in a private hospital in Vadodara, Gujarat, India. Two hundred and sixty-five mothers belonging to Gujarat state participated in the study. Questionnaires included vital statistics and mothers’ medical histories during their pregnancies, childbirth and their nutritional statuses.

The following questions were asked on infants feeding habits:

Mode of feeding of the child:

1. Only breastfeeding: Duration (in weeks) and Frequency (times/day)

(Only breast milk feeding, no other liquids including water, by oral or intravenous routes, except medicated oral drops or medications)

2. Partial breast feeding: Duration (in weeks) and Frequency (times/day)

(Also known as bottle feeding, which was supplemental to breast milk, other milk and related products, given orally in liquid form)

3. Spoon feeding: Duration (in weeks)

(Feeding of milk and other milk related products orally with the help of spoon)

4. Semisolid food feeding: Duration (in weeks)

(Feeding with the help of spoon and other instruments and food being in semi solid form)

5. First tooth eruption: Upper teeth (months) and Lower teeth (months):

(Any tooth with any part of its crown penetrating the gingiva and/or which was visible in the oral cavity)

After 15 days, a structured interview was conducted for mothers, to validate the reliability of data provided to them, by a group of orthodontists and pedodontists. Questionnaires with conflicting findings were excluded from the study. A systemic random sampling was done and data of a total of 200 patients were selected after obtaining their verbal consents, with equal generations and equal gender distributions. Ethical clearance was not mandatory, as the study was a questionnaire study.

SPSS, version 16.0 software was used for statistical analysis. A confidence interval of 95% and a level of 5% were set for carrying out statistical analysis. Mean and SD, Two-way ANOVA, comparison of interactions between generations and genders by doing Newman-Keuls multiple post-hoc procedures analysis, were used to derive results.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in relation to age, generation and gender for feeding habits [Table/Fig-1], Similarly, by Newman-Keuls multiple post hoc method, statistically significant differences were observed within and among generations and genders [Table/Fig-2].

Table showing mean and SD of various parameters according to generation and gender and comparison done by ANOVA Two way interaction (generation and gender)

FIAge (Years)Duration of Only Breast Feeding (Weeks)Frequency of Only Breast Feeding (Time/Day)Duration of Partial Breast Feeding (Weeks)Frequency of Feeding During Partial Breast Feeding (Time/Day)Spoon Feeding (Weeks)Semi Solid Food (Weeks)
MeanSDp-valueMeanSDp-valueMeanSDp-valueMeanSDp-valueMeanSDp-valueMeanSDp-valueMeanSDp-value
G1B34.29.4712.38.582.860.8815.436.225.332.548.165.148.964.99
G1G30.395.749.185.583.440.9616.1410.763.881.558.745.489.824.15
G2B3.681.4715.888.992.840.8414.7514.226.582.977.682.048.422.31
G2G2.681.3912.885.553.041.5914.1215.564.821.598.966.1211.184.19
Generation$0.0000*0.0010*0.20210.60720.0185*0.85290.4729
Gender$0.0029*0.0055*0.0181*0.9880.0007*0.18560.0017*
Generation vs Gender#0.07950.9560.24860.7980.73850.61770.0972

$ ANOVA; # Two way interaction; *statistically significant; FI, Factors and interaction; G1B, Generation 1 Boys; G1G, Generation 1 Girls; G2B, Generation 2 Boys; G2G, Generation 2 Girls


Comparison of interactions between generation and gender with respect to many parameters by Newman-Keuls multiple post hoc procedures

FIAge (Years)Duration of Breast Feeding (Weeks)Frequency of Breast Feeding (Times/Day)Duration of Bottle Feeding (Weeks)Duration of Bottle Feeding (Weeks)Spoon Feeding (Weeks)
G1BG1GG2BG2GG1BG1GG2BG2GG1BG1GG2BG2GG1BG1GG2BG2GG1BG1GG2BG2GG1BG1G
G1B-----
G1G0.0007*-0.0429*-0.0329*-0.84810.0688-0.558-
G2B0.0000*0.0000*-0.05280.0001*-0.93090.0472*-0.85510.92540.05650.0005*-0.62780.5324
G2G0.0000*0.0000*0.3737-0.70670.0432*0.0516-0.43510.08480.661-0.93340.94740.86480.43290.14820.0211*-0.6980.8242

statistically significant; FI, Factors and interaction; G1M, Generation 1 Boys; G1F, Generation 1 Girls; G2M, Generation 2 Boys; G2F, Generation 2 Girls


Statistically significant differences were observed for eruption times with respect to ages and genders [Table/Fig-3], as well as among genders of both generations [Table/Fig-4].

Table showing mean and SD of various parameters according to generation and gender and comparison done by ANOVA and Two way interaction (generation and gender)

FIFirst Erupted Tooth in LowerFirst Erupted Tooth in Upper
MeanSDp-ValueMeanSDp-Value
G1B6.821.336.360.84
G1G7.862.037.061.29
G2B9.842.538.081.93
G2G9.732.527.881.83
Generation$00.0001*
Gender$0.40130.4146
Generation vs Gender#0.29750.1439

$ ANOVA; # Two way interaction; *statistically significant; FI, Factors and interaction; G1B, Generation 1 Boys; G1G, Generation 1 Girls; G2B, Generation 2 Boys; G2G, Generation 2 Girls.


Comparison of interactions between generation and gender with respect to many parameters by Newman-Keuls multiple post hoc procedures

FIFirst Erupted Tooth in LowerFirst Erupted Tooth in Upper
G1BG1GG2BG2GG1BG1GG2BG2G
G1B--
G1G0.1845-0.1083-
G2B0.0011*0.0326*-0.0008*0.0487*-
G2G0.0010*0.0180*0.8854-0.0018*0.0500*0.6449-

*statistically significant; FI, Factors and interaction; G1B, Generation 1 Boys; G1G, Generation 1 Girls; G2B, Generation 2 Boys; G2G, Generation 2 Girls


Discussion

Every milestone of development in child is valuable clinical information for a clinician [13]. including eruption of first deciduous teeth [6]. These chronological milestones are influenced by many factors [4,6,14,15]. Any alteration in this physiological trend causes suspicion of an underlying disease [4]. This causes anxiety for parents and it leads to futile investigations such as radiographs, as most parents came for such self advised investigations. Local factors tend to be influenced by changing trends which are observed in environmental factors [10,11,16,17] which also vary between geographical areas, races and ethnicities [2, 68, 11,12].

Exclusive breastfeeding has an overall effect on growth and development of children [18]. Various studies have noted the effect of breastfeeding habits on orofacial development, including eruption of primary and permanent dentitions [16]. Larsson et al., [19] found that there was an increased dribble and biting or gnawing activity, especially around the eruption area during teething time. There were correlations between modes of feeding from breast to bottle to semisolid food in the development of cross bite.

Validity and reliability of data on feeding habits depend on mothers recall, short term memory is less reliable and optimal time is 36 months after birth of child [10,12,20]. Accurate information can also be obtained by doing a careful examination, even after 20 years [21, 22]. In the present study, among structured interviews and other check points which were used, a total of 200 (75%) from among 265 were found to be reliable.

We observed that current generation had increased breastfeeding durations, which were more in boys than in girls. This may be due to increased awareness and promotion of breast feeding by government and non government organizations. However, Folayan et al., [12] and Oziegbe et al., [10] did not find any link between teeth eruption timings and the durations of breastfeeding. We found that only breastfeeding frequencies had significant impact on timings and patterns than durations of breastfeeding. A similar observation was made by Folayan et al., [11] in Nigerian population. There was a significant difference in the patterns of eruptions of maxillary and mandibular teeth in EBF and PBF. However, an increase in age of eruption was seen in PBF than in EBF [11,12]. We found that frequency of breastfeeding was less in boys in comparison to that in girls. There were changes in trends of feeding (OBF) among generations and over a decade’s time, duration was increased but frequency had not changed much.

Partial breastfeeding duration was longer over a decade ago and it was more in girls than in boys. But a statistically significant difference could not be observed. However, mothers showed a positive response with respect to knowledge on breastfeeding. Frequency of PBF was found to be less a decade ago and it was also less in females than in males. Significant differences in generations and genders seen were comparable to those seen in Folayan et al’s [12] study done on effect of breast feeding and in Larsson E [19] study done on development of cross bite, which were related to various habits. At the same time, we would like to add the other factors which were employed during or before deciduous teeth eruptions, all of which had some or other roles. However, the present study did not show any correlation with duration of PBF as well as SF.

Interestingly, spoon feeding coincided with teething time. In G1, eruption of upper tooth was observed during 6.69±1.13 months and in G2, it was 7.98 ±1.84 months. G2 revealed delayed eruptions of teeth in both upper and lower arches among both genders, as was observed. This observation correlated with findings seen in earlier literatures [6,11]. Overall, females showed earlier eruptions of both upper and lower teeth, which was comparable with Gupta et al[8] finding. Despite the fact that more recent literature suggested secular trends and increased variances which were related to ethnic groups and socioeconomic statuses [23], Woodroffe et al., [6], in their study, found delayed eruptions of teeth in present generation as compared to those seen in a previous study. They observed changes in 10, 20 and 30 years of difference also.

There were definite alterations in patterns, sequences and times of eruptions of deciduous teeth, and they were dependent on racial, genetic and environmental factors, including breast feeding habits [6,8,1012,19] and even genetic influences [15]. This trend in delayed eruption was observed in Indian population also and it could be genetically influenced or could be caused by the effect of change in socio-economic status. However, eruption sequence was also altered and this was an interesting finding. This indicated a need for collection and preparation of dentition status, which evaluated the trends and patterns of teeth eruptions decade-wise, locally and globally.

Conclusion

Frequencies of various modes of feeding, breastfeeding, partial breastfeeding, including bottle feeding and the timings of initiation of soft food, have significant impacts on the timings and patterns of eruptions of first deciduous teeth. A delay in eruption age was seen; it was 8.08 months for boys and 7.88 for girls in Indian population. Upper deciduous teeth erupt first in the oral cavity. Dentists and other medical and paramedical professionals, along with general public, should be made aware of the present trends and patterns of eruptions of deciduous teeth.

$ ANOVA; # Two way interaction; *statistically significant; FI, Factors and interaction; G1B, Generation 1 Boys; G1G, Generation 1 Girls; G2B, Generation 2 Boys; G2G, Generation 2 Girlsstatistically significant; FI, Factors and interaction; G1M, Generation 1 Boys; G1F, Generation 1 Girls; G2M, Generation 2 Boys; G2F, Generation 2 Girls$ ANOVA; # Two way interaction; *statistically significant; FI, Factors and interaction; G1B, Generation 1 Boys; G1G, Generation 1 Girls; G2B, Generation 2 Boys; G2G, Generation 2 Girls.*statistically significant; FI, Factors and interaction; G1B, Generation 1 Boys; G1G, Generation 1 Girls; G2B, Generation 2 Boys; G2G, Generation 2 Girls

References

[1]ADA Division of Communications ADA Council on Scientific AffairsFor the dental patient. Tooth eruption: The primary teeth J Am Dent Assoc 2005 136:1619  [Google Scholar]

[2]Peterkova R, Lesot H, Peterka M, Phylogenetic memory of developing mammalian dentition J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 2006 306:234-50.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Saxena S, Age estimation of indian adults from orthopantomographs Braz Oral Res 2011 25(3):225-9.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Kobayashi TY, Gomide MR, Carrara CF, Timing and sequence of primary tooth eruption in children with cleft lip and palate J Appl Oral Sci 2010 18:220-4.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Crespi B, The evolutionary biology of child health Proc Biol Sci 2011 278:1441-9.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Woodroffe S, Mihailidis S, Hughes T, Bockmann M, Seow WK, Gotjamanos T, Primary tooth emergence in Australian children: timing, sequence and patterns of asymmetry Aust Dent J 2010 55:245-51.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Mihailidis S, Woodroffe SN, Hughes TE, Bockmann MR, Townsend GC, Patterns of asymmetry in primary tooth emergence of Australian twins Front Oral Biol 2009 13:110-5.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Gupta A, Hiremath SS, Singh SK, Poudyal S, Niraula SR, Baral DD, Emergence of primary teeth in children of Sunsari district of Eastern Nepal Mcgill J Med 2007 10:11-5.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Daugaard S, Christensen IJ, Kjaer I, Delayed dental maturity in dentitions with agenesis of mandibular second premolars Orthod Craniofac Res 2010 13:191-6.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Oziegbe EO, Adekoya-Sofowora Esan TA, Owotade FJ, Folayan MO, Breast feeding pattern and eruption of primary teeth in Nigerain children Ped Dent J 2010 20:1-6.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Folayan MO, Oziegbe EO, Esan AO, Breastfeeding, timing and number of erupted teeth in first twelve months of life in Nigerian children Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010 11:279-82.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Folayan M, Owotade F, Adejuyigbe E, Sen S, Lawal B, Ndukwe K, The timing of eruption of the primary dentition in Nigerian children Am J Phys Anthropol 2007 134:443-8.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Leighton BC, The early sighs of malocclusion Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc 1969 :353-68.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Sano N, Hasegawa Y, Iijima S, Terada K, Study of delayed development of the upper first molars Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 2010 87:25-31.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Hughes TE, Bockmann MR, Seow K, Gotjamanos T, Gully N, Richards LC, Strong genetic control of emergence of human primary incisors J Dent Res 2007 86:1160-5.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Sahin F, Camurdan AD, Camurdan MO, Olmez A, Oznurhan F, Beyazova U, Factors affecting the timing of teething in healthy Turkish infants: a prospective cohort study Int J Paediatr Dent 2008 18:262-6.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Soliman NL, El-Zainy MA, Hassan RM, Aly RM, Timing of deciduous teeth emergence in Egyptian children East Mediterr Health J 2011 17:875-81.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Ahn CH, MacLean WC Jr, Growth of the exclusively breast-fed infant Am J Clin Nutr 1980 33:183-92.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Larsson E, Sucking, chewing, and feeding habits and the development of crossbite: a longitudinal study of girls from birth to 3 years of age Angle Orthod 2001 71:116-9.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Bland RM, Rollins NC, Solarsh G, van den Broeck J, Coovadia HM, Child Health Group. Maternal recall of exclusive breast feeding duration Arch Dis Child 2003 88:778-83.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Kark JD, Troya G, Friedlander Y, Slater PE, Stein Y, Validity of maternal reporting of breast feeding history and the association with blood lipids in 17 year olds in Jerusalem J Epidemiol Community Health 1984 38:218-25.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Natland ST, Andersen LF, Nilsen TI, Forsmo S, Jacobsen GW, Maternal recall of breastfeeding duration twenty years after delivery BMC Med Res Methodol 2012 12:179  [Google Scholar]

[23]Monique-Marie Rousset, Rousset MM, Boualam N, Delfosse C, Roberts WE, Emergence of permanent teeth: secular trends and variance in a modern sample J Dent Child (Chic) 2003 70:208-14.  [Google Scholar]