JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Original Article DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7782.4017
Year : 2014 | Month : Feb | Volume : 8 | Issue : 2 Full Version Page : 92 - 94

Pain Management after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-A Randomized Prospective Trial of Low Pressure and Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum

Sanjeev Singla1, Geeta Mittal2, Raghav3, Rajinder K Mittal4

1 Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India.
3 Senior Resident, Department of Neurosurgery, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India.
4 Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Geeta Mittal, H.No. 1841, Street No. 6, Maharaj Nagar, Ludhiana-141001, India.
Phone: 09815528855,
E-mail: geetatmittal@yahoo.co.in
Abstract

Background: Abdominal pain and shoulder tip pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are distressing for the patient. Various causes of this pain are peritoneal stretching and diaphragmatic irritation by high intra-abdominal pressure caused by pneumoperitoneum . We designed a study to compare the post operative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy at low pressure (7-8 mm of Hg) and standard pressure technique (12-14 mm of Hg).

Aim : To compare the effect of low pressure and standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in post laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain . Further to study the safety of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Settings and Design: A prospective randomised double blind study.

Materials and Methods: A prospective randomised double blind study was done in 100 ASA grade I & II patients. They were divided into two groups -50 each. Group A patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low pressure pneumoperitoneum (7-8 mm Hg) while group B underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (12-13 mm Hg). Both the groups were compared for pain intensity, analgesic requirement and complications.

Statistical Analysis: Demographic data and intraoperative complications were analysed using chi-square test. Frequency of pain, intensity of pain and analgesics consumption was compared by applying ANOVA test.

Results: Post-operative pain score was significantly less in low pressure group as compared to standard pressure group. Number of patients requiring rescue analgesic doses was more in standard pressure group . This was statistically significant. Also total analgesic consumption was more in standard pressure group. There was no difference in intraoperative complications.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the use of simple expedient of reducing the pressure of pneumoperitoneum to 8 mm results in reduction in both intensity and frequency of post-operative pain and hence early recovery and better outcome.This study also shows that low pressure technique is safe with comparable rate of intraoperative complications.

Keywords

Introduction

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard procedure for cholelithiasis. As compared to open cholecystectomy, it is less painful, needs shorter recovery time and shorter hospital stay [1]. Recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends upon several factors such as abdominal pain, shoulder tip pain, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. These side-effects are due to peritoneal stretching and diaphragmatic irritation caused by high intra-abdominal pressure and by CO2.[2]. Keeping this in mind, it was assumed that lower intra-abdominal pressure will decrease these complications. Traditionally, the pressure used to create pneumoperitoneum is around 15mm of Hg [3]. There are a few studies done using low pressure pneumoperitoneum (less than 12 mm of Hg) and showed decrease in pain post-operatively [2,4,5]. But, all the studies are not equivocal in this respect [6]. Further, the safety of low pressure pneumoperitoneum is not established. We designed a study to compare the post-operative pain after laparoscopic cholecyste-ctomy at low pressure (7-8 mm of Hg) and standard pressure technique (12-14 mm of Hg) and also to compare the duration of surgery and intraoperative complications between these two techniques.

Materials and Methods

A prospective randomised double blind study was done in 100 ASA grade I and II patients of age Group 20-75 years who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated symptomatic gall stone disease. The study was conducted in a tertiary care centre, after taking approval from hospital ethical committee. Patients were divided into two Groups of 50 each. Group A patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low pressure pneumoperitoneum (7-8 mm Hg) while Group B underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (12-14 mm Hg). Patients having other co-morbid conditions, pregnant patients, patients on NSAIDS or other analgesics, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and CBD exploration or converted to open surgery were excluded from the study. A written informed consent was taken from all the patients. All the patients were educated about the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the time of pre-anaesthetic check-up. Patients were prepared by overnight fasting and premedicated with Tab. Alprazolam 0.25mg orally, on previous night and 0.25 mg orally, on the morning of surgery with sips of water. In the operation theatre, an intravenous line was established. Patients were premedicated with inj. Glycopyrrolate 0.005 mg/kg intravenous before surgery. Monitors were attached to measure pulse rate (PR), blood pressure (BP), oxygen saturation (SpO2) and ECG. All the patients were given Inj. Fentanyl 2 μg/kg intravenous for analgesia. Induction of anaesthesia was done with Inj. Thiopentone 4-5 mg/kg intravenous and endotracheal intubation was facilitated using Inj. Atracurium 0.5-0.7 mg/kg intravenous. Anaesthesia was maintained by using O2 and N2O (33% + 66%) along with Isoflurane 0.4% and incremental doses of Inj. Atracurium when required. End tidal CO2 was monitored throughout the procedure and was maintained between 30-35 mm of Hg.

In all patients surgery was performed using standard four working ports technique. As per the computer generated randomisation chart, patients were operated on low pressure or standard pressure technique of pneumoperitoneum. Intraoperative complications like bile leak and bleeding were noted in both the Groups. Total duration of surgery was also noted. At the end of surgery, residual muscle relaxation was reversed by Inj. Neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg i.v and Inj. Glycopyrrolate 0.01mg/kg i.v. After completion of surgery all patients were prescribed Inj. Diclofenac sodium intravenous 75mg 8 hourly for the post-operative analgesia and Inj. Ondensetron- 4mg intravenous to prevent post-operative vomiting. Post-operative pain and associated problems like nausea and vomiting were noted at 0min, 1hr, 2hrs, 4hrs, 8hrs, 12hrs & 24hrs. Post-operative pain was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain. Patients marked the intensity of pain with a vertical line on a 10cm scale with the left end described ‘no pain’ and right end described as worst pain [7].

Patients complaining of pain were treated by rescue analgesic in the form of intravenous doses of inj. Fentanyl 20 μg. Rescue analgesic was repeated on request by patient with minimum interval of 20 minutes. The dosage of Inj. Fentanyl and time of administration were noted by staff nurse.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean (± SD).The Demographic data was analysed using chi-square test except male/female ratio which was analysed using ANOVA test. Frequency of pain, intensity of pain and analgesics consumption between two Groups was compared by applying ANOVA test. Intraoperative complications and post-operative nausea vomiting was analysed using chi-square test. Significance was defined as p <0.05.

Results

Both the Groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, weight and duration of surgery. There was female preponderance for gall stone disease [Table/Fig-1]. In both the Groups, there was no pain immediately after surgery.

Demographic profile of patients and duration of surgery

Group A.(LP) n=50Group B.(SP) n=50p-value
Age (yrs.)50.60 ± 13.9553.76 ± 13.800.258
Male/Female ratio12/3820/300.086
Weight (Kgs)60.16 ± 9.7159.32 ± 9.960.670
Duration of Surg. (mins.)39.16 ± 5.1439.36 ± 5.430.851

Age, weight, duration of surgery, presented as mean±standard deviation. Test done was ANOVA for age, weight and duration of surgery and chi-square test for male/female ratio. (n is no. of patients,yrs is years,kgs is kilograms,mins is minutes)


At 1 hr, 2 hrs, 4hrs, 8hrs and 12 hrs. interval, pain frequency was higher in Group B as compared to Group A with p-value < 0.05. At 24 hrs, no patient from Group A complained of pain. But in Group B, 16 patients complained of pain [Table/Fig-2].

Comparison of number of patients who required rescue analgesics at various time intervals

Time intervalGroup A (LP) n=50Group B (SP) n=50p-value
No.PercentageNo.Percentage
0 min.00.00%00.00%0
1 hr48.00%1632.00%0.0462
2 hrs48.00%1632.00%0.0462
4 hrs48.00%1632.00%0.0462
8 hrs48.00%1632.00%0.0462
12 hrs48.00%1632.00%0.0462
24 hrs00.00%1632.00%0.00836

Data is presented as number and percentage. Test done was ANOVA. n is no. of patients, (hr is hours.) p< 0.05 is statistically significant


Intensity of pain was assessed by VAS score at specified interval. At all the intervals Mean VAS score was higher in Group B as compared to Group A with statistically significant difference. Mean of total VAS score of Group A was 1.42 and of Group B was 7.88 with p-value of 0.001. So intensity of pain measured by VAS was significantly higher in Group B [Table/Fig-3].

Comparison of Intensity of Pain (VAS) in two groups

Time intervalGroup A (LP) n=50Group B (SP) n=50p-value
Mean VASStandard deviationMean VASStandard deviation
0 min0000
1 hr0.140.4850.460.7270.011
2 hrs0.280.9701.261.9010.002
4 hrs0.361.2411.442.1960.003
8 hrs0.321.0961.562.3230.001
12 hrs0.240.8222.163.2280.000
24 hrs0.080.2741.001.5650.000
Total1.424.887.8811.760.001

VAS is visual analogue scale, hr is hours, n is no. of patients, (SP is standard pressure, LP is low pressure.) Test applied is ANOVA . p< 0.05 is statistically significant


Only four patients in Group A and sixteen patients in Group B were given rescue analgesic. Maximum demand of rescue analgesic was during 3rd and 4th hour with mean demand of 30 μg in Group A and 45 μg in Group B. It was statistically significant difference with p-value of 0.045. During rest of the intervals rescue analgesic demand was higher in Group B but it was not statistically significant. Overall analgesic consumption was higher in Group B [Table/Fig-4].

Comparison of analgesic consumption in two groups (Inj. Fentanyl μg/day)

Time IntervalGroup A (n=4)Group B (n=16)p-value
Total Dose (μg)Mean (μg)Std DeviationTotal Dose (μg)Mean (μg)Std Deviation
Ist hour80200.000320200.000_
Ist - 2nd hrs80200.0004803010.3280.074
3rd - 4th hrs120300.0007204513.6630.045
5th - 8th hrs1203011.5475603513.6630.511
9th - 12th hrs401011.547400258.9440.011
13th - 24th hrs000.000320200.000_

(n is number of patients, hr is hour, μg is microgram). Test applied is ANOVA. p< 0.05 is statistically significant


Rate of complications was comparable between two Groups. So, low pressure pneumoperitoneum did not interfere with the surgical procedure [Table/Fig-5].

Comparison of complications

ComplicationGroup A (LP) n=50Group B (SP) n=50p-value
NumberPercentageNumberPercentage
I/O Bleeding48.00612.000.505
I/O Bile Leak612.0048.000.505
Nausea/Vomiting48.00816.000.218

I/O is intraoperative.Test applied is chi-square . p< 0.05 is statistically significant


Discussion

Major benefit of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the avoidance of upper abdominal incision resulting in less post-operative pain and early recovery. But even laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not free from discomfort and pain. Patients usually have abdominal pain and shoulder tip pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Various causes of this pain are peritoneal stretching and diaphragmatic irritation by high intra-abdominal pressure caused by pneumoperitoneum or by CO2 absorption from the peritoneal cavity [2]. Several research studies are done to find out the ways to reduce frequency and intensity of post-operative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Intra-peritoneal local anaesthetic instillation, removal of residual CO2 before closure, peritoneal washout with saline, ultrasound guided transverse abdominis plane block with local anaesthetic are the various techniques that have been studied [811]. Many post-operative analgesics, e.g., diclofenac sodium, Fentanyl, Morphine, Ketoprofen, Ibuprofen have been studied but none of them showed sufficiently positive results for complete analgesia. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy needs multimodal analgesia for complete pain relief.

Studies have been done to compare the effect of different intra-abdominal pressures on post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain [12,13]. It has been shown that low insufflation pressure reduces pain frequency, as well as, pain intensity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy [5]. Analgesic requirement is also less in low pressure technique. There are other advantages of low pressure technique, such as less hemodynamic variation, which is specially beneficial in patients having cardiac disease [12,14]. The increased intra-abdominal pressure due to the pneumoperitoneum causes several cardiopulmonary changes. The increased intra-abdom inal pressure increases the absorption of CO2, causing hypercapnia and acidosis, which has to be avoided by hyperventilation. It pushes the diaphragm upwards decreasing the pulmonary compliance and increases the peak airway pressure. Pneumoperitoneum increases the systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance. Carbon-dioxide pneumoperitoneum also predisposes to cardiac arrhythmias. During the early phase of pneumoperitoneum, there is a reduction in the cardiac output by decreasing the venous return. While these cardio-respiratory changes may be tolerated by healthy adults with adequate cardiopulmonary reserve, people with cardiopulmonary diseases may not tolerate these cardiopulmonary changes. About 17% of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status of III or IV. Low insufflation pressure may be beneficial for these patients.

Results of our study have shown that post-operative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less both in frequency and intensity in low pressure group. Mean VAS score came down to 0.08 at 24 hrs in low pressure group, whereas it was 1.00 in standard pressure Group. These data are in agreement with those of other authors [5]. In majority of the patients post-operative pain could be managed by injection Diclofenac sodium 75 mg IV given 8 hourly. But, 4 patients in Group A and 16 patients in Group B required additional analgesia in the form of injection Fentanyl 20mcg IV bolus at various intervals. Total consumption of injection Fentanyl was significantly less in Group A. Consumption of Fentanyl per patient, out of four, who required additional analgesia in Group A was 110 μg, whereas it was 175 μg per patient out of 16 in Group B. Incidence of complications like bile leak and bleeding post-operative nausea and vomiting were similar in both the Groups.The same was observed by Wallace et al., Sandhu et al., Sarli et al., [2,4,5].

Duration of surgery was also comparable between two Groups. This indicates that the exposure is adequate with low pressure technique and the surgery could be performed in the same duration and without compromising the safety and efficacy of surgical procedure. But this may depend upon experience of surgeon. Many patient factors may also interfere, e.g., obese patients, previous surgery and presence of adhesions, etc. So, further studies are needed to compare with different surgical teams and in obese patients.

Guruswamy KS, Samraj K searched cochrane central register of trials and collected data from fifteen randomised trials. They found that intensity of pain was lower in low pressure Group. The analgesic consumption was also lower. But due to high risk of bias due to incomplete outcome data in seven trials, it was not possible to conclude about the safety of low pressure pneumoperitoneum [12]. All studies were done in ASA grade 1 & 2. To study the cardiovascular stability by low pressure pneumoperitoneum, further studies are needed in patients having cardiac disease or ASA grade 3 & 4 patients with other problems. Ingelmo et al., showed that Ropivacaine (1%) intraperitoneal nebulisation before and after (3ml) surgery reduced post-operative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It also reduced Morphine consumption and allowed early mobility [15].

Analysing the results of our study, we opine that low pressure pneumoperitoneum results in decrease in intensity and frequency of post-operative pain and fewer requirement of analgesics as compared to standard pressure. Further studies can be planned by combining low pressure techniques with other techniques like local anaesthetic infiltration of wounds and intraperitoneal instillation of Ropivacaine or Bupivacaine to decrease analgesic requirement. There is, thus, a need for further research into ways to improve the quality of the post-operative care of these patients.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the use of simple expedient of reducing the pressure of pneumoperitoneum to 8 mm of Hg results in reduction in both intensity and frequency of post-operative pain and hence, early recovery and better outcome. This will promote day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hence, leads to cost saving. Further studies can be planned for assessing possibility of day case surgery and early return to work.

Age, weight, duration of surgery, presented as mean±standard deviation. Test done was ANOVA for age, weight and duration of surgery and chi-square test for male/female ratio. (n is no. of patients,yrs is years,kgs is kilograms,mins is minutes)Data is presented as number and percentage. Test done was ANOVA. n is no. of patients, (hr is hours.) p< 0.05 is statistically significantVAS is visual analogue scale, hr is hours, n is no. of patients, (SP is standard pressure, LP is low pressure.) Test applied is ANOVA . p< 0.05 is statistically significant(n is number of patients, hr is hour, μg is microgram). Test applied is ANOVA. p< 0.05 is statistically significantI/O is intraoperative.Test applied is chi-square . p< 0.05 is statistically significant

References

[1]Edward ND, Barclay K, Catling SJ, Martin DG, Morgan RH, Day care laparoscopy: A survey of post-operative pain and assessment of the value of diclofenac Anaesthesia 1991 46:1077-80.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Wallace DH, Serpell MG, Basxter JN, O’Dwyer PJ, Randomized trial of different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Surg 1997 84:455-8.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Russell RC, General surgery: Biliary surgery BMJ (Clinical Research Ed) 1993 307(6914):1266-9.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Sandhu T, Yamada S, Ariyakachon V, Chakrabandhu T, Chongruksut W, Ko-iam W, Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum versus standard pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized clinical trial Surg Endosc 2009 23:1044-7.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Sarli L, Costi R, Sansebastiano CG, Trivelli M, Roncoroni L, Prospective randomized trial of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum for reduction of shoulder tip pain following laparoscopy Br J Surg 2000 87:1161-5.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Koc M, Ertan T, Tez M, Kocpinar MA, Kilic M, Gocmen E, Randomized prospective comparison of post-operative pain in low versus high-pressure pneumoperitoneum ANZ J Surg 2005 75:693-6.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y, The visual analogue scale for pain-clinical significance in post-operative patients Anaesthesiology 2001 95:1356-61.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, Weerts J, Lamy M, Pain after laparoscopy cholecystectomy. Characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine Anaesth Analg 1995 81:379-84.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Phelps P, Cakmakkaya OS, Apfel CC, Radke OC, A simple clinical maneuver to reduce laparoscopy induced shoulder pain. A randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 2008 111:1155-60.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Barczynski M, Herman RM, Low pressure pneumoperitoneum combined with intraperitoneal saline washout for reduction of pain after laparoscopy cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 2004 18:1368-73.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Ra YS, Kim CH, Lee YG, Han JI, The analgesic effect of the ultrasound guided transverse abdominis plane block after laparoscopy cholecystectomy Korean J Anesthesiol 2010 58(4):362-68.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR, Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Review) The Cochrane Database of systemic Reviews 2009 2:CD006930  [Google Scholar]

[13]Yasir M, Mehta KS, Banday VH, Aiman A, Masood I, Iqbal B, Evaluation of post-operative shoulder tip pain in low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surgeon 2012 2:71-4.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, McMahon MJ, Hemodynamic consequences of high & low pressure capnoperitoneum duing laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 1999 13:376-81.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Ingelmo PM, Bucciero M, Somaini M, Sahillioglu E, Garbagnati A, Charton A, Intraperitoneal nebulisation of ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial Br J Anaesth 2013 110:800-6.  [Google Scholar]